Block TOMBOT please

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
At least get him off my fucking "DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE ME" thread. Before I get on a plane, come over there and smash his fucking skull into pieces.

Thank you.

Donnie Smith The Quiz Kid, Tuesday, 21 September 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

*having calmed down a bit some hours later*

Actually can you just delete that whole thread please. It's become rotten and riddled with hate and I don't want it up on ILx any further.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 21 September 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Hi Marcello, I've locked the thread temporarily right now. If you want it deleted outright of course that's your call (since it's so personal) but I wanted to lock it first and give you the chance to change your mind, since there's so much on it. Drop another post here if you change your mind, otherwise I'll get rid of the thread in a bit.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

marcello- Do reconsider as to whether you'd like to delete the thread - there seems to be some ok dialogue on much of that thread and i think there could be some more of that in the future. Maybe lock it for a few days then maybe the thread could be unlocked. Give it a day or two.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

How long, exactly, is everyone going to cater to Marcello? I read what Tom wrote. It wasn't bad by anyone's standards, certainly not to the standards of Marcello's reaction, right here.

I really don't understand how this kind of behavior is somehow less damaging than, say, Jon Harmless Williams's behavior that got him in a firestorm and changed the entire coding of ilx, for christ's sake.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Ally is completely correct here as far as I can see. If anyone went overboard on that thread and deserves banning as a result, it's Marcello himself and Blount (ie, the two people who actually said spiteful, nasty, hateful things).

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

While Marcello definitely over-reacted, I don't think it was necessary for Tom to come in guns-a-blazing either when (I think) Marcello made it clear earlier in the thread that it was a thread for him to moan, and he wasn't particularly interested in that kind of commentary on the thread. It's a free forum, sure, and people can say what they want, but in this case it definitely took two to tango. The altercation was NOT necessary. (And yeah, the threat at the top of this thread was unnecessary as well, but I was also going to delete this thread after the decision was made pro/con anyhow.)

I'm not going to make excuses for anyone's behaviour on either side of this. I just wish people would learn when to back off. ON BOTH SIDES.

My decision to consider deleting the thread altogether has nothing to do with Tom vs Marcello or Marcello vs Tom etc, but because of the extremely personal nature of the the thread, precedents established, yadda yadda.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I really should have explicitly said something about threatening threads when I was proposing moderation guidelines, I'm starting to see. Oh well.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 21 September 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The thread will not be deleted, but will remain locked.

As far as I'm concerned, Marcello Carlin outstayed his welcome here long ago. He has show little courtesy for anybody else on these boards in recent times, and should know better than to expect from us the type of generosity and patience which he himself has failed to deliver time and time again.

By bringing his problems to ILE, Marcello effectively opened himself to criticism. If he wasn't prepared to witness a discussion of his person, he shouldn't have gotten personal on the boards.

Putting "DO NOT READ IF YOU HATE ME" in your thread title does not magically refuse entry to those that hate you and want to condemn or provoke you. There is a standard of freedom of speech which I at least try to uphold here, and Tom was well within his rights to make the comments he did.

The fact that I personally agree with the points he raised have nothing to do with this policy decision.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Your post is typical of the self-satisfied gentrified bourgeois gliberal hypocrisy - forgive the criminal, blame the victim - which has driven me away from ILx in the past.

Let me reiterate. That thread was designed specifically for me to have a moan. The subtitle "Do Not Read If You Hate" would, I would have thought, indicated that people who did not like me or my writing should avoid reading it or contributing to it. And on that thread I was very clear in my intention to muse over/discuss personal issues rationally and constructively.

Contrary to what you might think, I do have affection for ILx as a virtual community and enjoy good discussion, however argumentative or combative it may get. But when you get people who plainly don't want to engage with me at any level, who want to use my thread - despite its title - for attacks and pathetic oneupmanship - well, why should my threads serve as a platform for them?

Your third paragraph is crass and arrogant beyond belief. No doubt you would deploy the standard argument is that ILx is a public space and therefore if one comes on it one should expect criticism. Fair enough. But there's a difference between critical engagement and people simply indulging in name calling. The public space argument is flawed for similar reasons. Having a conversation in a pub is something that happens in a public space; nevertheless, it seems to me reasonanble to object to people at the next table who haven't listened and who are not interested in the conversation continually interrupting and distracting those who actually do want to participate. Or wasters who barge in from the street shouting abuse at the customers.

Nevertheless, I am going to withdraw from ILx, this time permanently, as I know when I'm not wanted and I know whom I don't want in my life.

I'm genuinely saddened that it's come to this, but I get enough stress and abuse at work, why should posting on message boards turn into something twice as unpleasant because of freeloading parasites like TOMBOT and his ilk, and their smug moderator protectors?

Bye then everyone. I'll only come back on ILx if or when everyone's different.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Bye then everyone. I'll only come back on ILx if or when everyone's different.

There's your problem in a nutshell, Marcello.

Change "when everyone is different" to "when *I* am different" and you might find success for a change.

Danger Whore (kate), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Who called you a name? Besides ne, you gigantic moron.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

But there's a difference between critical engagement and people simply indulging in name calling.

Yeah, there is. Tom brought forward critical engagement, and you were doing the namecalling.

Bye then everyone. I'll only come back on ILx if or when everyone's different.

Of course, it is everyone else who has to change to suit you. This is typical of your attitude, and perfectly illustrates why I won't miss you in the least. Good-by.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Bye Randy

Free the Bee (ex machina), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

IM RANDY YOU FUCKING YANK TWAT. YOULL NEVER DISCOVER WHO I REALLY AM. BECAUSE YOURE AS DUMB AS A STREAK OF PISS. ILL FUCKING KNOCK YOU OUT IF I SEE YOUR SPOTTY I-WANK-TOO-MUCH NEVER-BEEN-LAID RACIST UGLY FUCKING TWATTY FACE IN THE REAL WORLD. CUNT.

RANDOS SNR, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Not really doing much to disprove the "Randos is Marcello" theory there.

(NOTE: I do not subscribe to this theory.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

well, why should my threads serve as a platform for them?

they're not your threads.

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Having a conversation in a pub is something that happens in a public space; nevertheless, it seems to me reasonanble to object to people at the next table who haven't listened and who are not interested in the conversation continually interrupting and distracting those who actually do want to participate. Or wasters who barge in from the street shouting abuse at the customers.

This is why posting a thread on a message board is not analogous to having a conversation in a pub. (Yes, I know he's "gone" but really shoddy thinking irritates me.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm sure he'll turn up under some other name soon

amateur!!st, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I was going to point that out, Dan, but thought it would dilute my core message. (ie 'fuck off marcello')

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 23 September 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.