dudes...
webmail seriously needs a thing that tells you to include your email address in the body of the text so that the recipient can write you back!
i guess it should be obvious but it seems like most people would forget, or assume that info is somehow pasted into the email. i've received a bunch that i could not reply to.
it doesnt even need to be a code change, you could just put some sort of warning at the top of the page or somethin somethin!!
― s1ocki, Sunday, 22 March 2009 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
dude it says who sent you the webmail, couldnt you just go find a post by them and click on their name/send webmail to this user?
― abe being busy (k3vin k.), Sunday, 22 March 2009 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
I'm pretty sure this isn't an oversight. Some folks want to send mail without revealing their own address.
Perhaps a good way to deal with this issue would be to pre-populate the text field with the user's email address, like "reply-to: s1ut✧✧✧@gm✧✧✧.c✧✧".
― plenty chong (libcrypt), Sunday, 22 March 2009 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
ya im just saying a little nudge would be helpful
― s1ocki, Sunday, 22 March 2009 20:34 (seventeen years ago)
Well, a reference to the original message would be best.
Then, the recipient can go back to the message, click on the name, send reply, and security is preserved.
― Mark G, Monday, 23 March 2009 09:55 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah I've gotten emails before (and today) with no idea who they were from.
Its pretty annoying, sorry.
― one art, please (Trayce), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
actually, my suggestion is wrong.
Maybe a link in the message, like the one on a posted message,with the registered name, clickable, and etc...
― Mark G, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 07:54 (seventeen years ago)
― caek, Wednesday, 25 March 2009 03:25 (seventeen years ago)
^^ what he (i) said
― s1ocki, Thursday, 26 March 2009 15:09 (seventeen years ago)