Do it. The only bad point is annoyance that it's only a third complete and will more than likely remain so.
― chap, Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link
Absolutely, it's one of Moore's best works. It's more of a "episode comic" than a perfectly crafted whole, like Moore's later work, but many of the episodes are brilliant in themselves, and in the end it does also provide a pretty moving story about the protagonist's growth from a naive teen girl to self-respecting adult. (The ending is left a bit open though, as there was supposed to be sequels, but they never happened.)
― Tuomas, Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link
(x-post)
Halo Jones is brilliant, I recommend it highly. The unfinished thing people talk about is not a problem - it is like the life of someone from before they were famous. In this case, probably the more interesting bits.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:18 (fifteen years ago) link
The unfinished thing people talk about is not a problem
It does work perfectly well as it stands. I just want more!
― chap, Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:05 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah, me too. If Moore is actually finishing this Bojeffries thing he started 25 years ago, then maybe there's hope for those Halo Jones sequels too. Though of course it also depends on whether Ian Gibson is up to do it.
― Tuomas, Friday, 5 June 2009 06:11 (fifteen years ago) link
a) Bojeffries isn't one long story, it's short pieces, and he did them as and when for ten years, so doing another new piece for another new compilation is basically standard practice
b) he's had 25 years of saying he will never ever go back to Halo Jones, and this is Alan Moore speaking: how does that translate to "hope"?
― other instrument (sic), Friday, 5 June 2009 06:19 (fifteen years ago) link
Gibson's always said he's up for it, on the other hand.
― chap, Friday, 5 June 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago) link
Gibson actually did do more without Moore, didn't he?
― other instrument (sic), Friday, 5 June 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link
All I know of is this concept pic for book four:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/38/Halo_slave2.jpg
― chap, Friday, 5 June 2009 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah, brainfart, I was thinking of Skizz.
― other instrument (sic), Saturday, 6 June 2009 01:39 (fifteen years ago) link
Picked up LoEG 3:1910 yesterday, and really enjoyed it. Always good to see new vintage characters turning up, and Carnacki is one of my favorites.
Years ago, I saw an article by Moore in which he was enthusing about a strip by Cliff Harper in Last Gasp Comix' ANARCHY: 'The Black Freighter', based on a Brecht lyric. This was later referenced in the pirate strip in Watchmen, and the song turns up again here, interwoven with another Brecht lyric 'What Keeps Mankind Alive'. Obviously, the original strip had a big impact on Moore. Harper is still working as an illustrator, and his woodcut-styled images turn up pretty regularly in the Guardian.
― Soukesian, Sunday, 7 June 2009 11:21 (fifteen years ago) link
. . oh, and Mac the Knife is in there too, of course!
― Soukesian, Sunday, 7 June 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link
LoEG 3:1910
just got this myself - its awesome! Loved the Threepenny Opera stuff running through it
― the butt is like a wailin' guitar solo (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 23 November 2009 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link
Dodgem Logic is a bit of a throwback to the 80s fanzine scene, I must say.
― I thought I could make it work because you look a bit like a man (aldo), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 07:51 (fourteen years ago) link
The problem with Halo was a creators rights issue, wasn't it? Moore refused to carry on the series until IPC gave him back the rights to all the characters he created for them, which at that time was never going to happen. And I think he has some undisclosed beef with 2000AD's current publishers which means he probably wouldn't be doing anything for them.
I'm sure I remember hearing that Gibson has expressed an interest in carrying on the series on his own? Apparently it was very much a collaboration between the two of them in terms of plotting and story ideas, there's a few interesting tidbits in "Thrill Power Overload" about it.
― Pheeel, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link
This Dodgem thing any good Aldo?
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:40 (fourteen years ago) link
And I think he has some undisclosed beef with 2000AD's current publishers which means he probably wouldn't be doing anything for them.
Alan Moore in crazy feud with publisher! Astonishing.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 13:33 (fourteen years ago) link
I don't think his feuds w/publishers have been particularly crazy... the America's Best fiasco was amazingly underhanded
― Gimme That Christian Side-hug, that Christian Side-hug (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 17:07 (fourteen years ago) link
We need a "favorite uncompromising bridge-burning comics creator" poll.
― Bob Saget's "Night Moves": C or D (WmC), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 17:26 (fourteen years ago) link
The more I think about that, the more I like it. Who has recommendations? Adams, Toth, Sim, Ditko, Moore, Kenneth Smith, Byrne, Macfarlane on my shortlist so far.
― Bob Saget's "Night Moves": C or D (WmC), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link
Sim? Certainly uncompromising, and he's pissed off a lot of his peers. But he's never had beef with a publisher for obvious reasons.
― Communi-Bear Silo State (chap), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 18:37 (fourteen years ago) link
He's had tons of beef with publishers! He's just never put himself in a position where they could punish him financially for his views.
― Bob Saget's "Night Moves": C or D (WmC), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 19:26 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^OTM
Sim beefed with distributors as well
― Gimme That Christian Side-hug, that Christian Side-hug (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link
Who has recommendations
Kirby duh
― Gimme That Christian Side-hug, that Christian Side-hug (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link
kirby compromised, willingly or otherwise, plenty of times in his career
my nominations - r. crumb (no compromise), wally wood (all bridges incinerated)
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 22:15 (fourteen years ago) link
Dodgem Logic is endearingly crap btw - feels like it could've come hot off the presses of the Birmingham Arts Lab
― Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link
oh sorry I misread the poll request as being specifically about artist v. publisher feuds... nevermind!
― Gimme That Christian Side-hug, that Christian Side-hug (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 22:23 (fourteen years ago) link
frank miller, robert williams, john byrne?
― ilx mooncup (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 22:24 (fourteen years ago) link
Cosign on Dodgem Logic. Has next to nothing to praise it for other than feeling like you should/could have bought it 25 years ago, although the CD is OK and the feature on the Northampton music scene was all right.
― I thought I could make it work because you look a bit like a man (aldo), Thursday, 26 November 2009 13:44 (fourteen years ago) link
I finally read LOEG: 1910, and was a bit underwhelmed by it. Like Chap said upthread, it barely has a plot. The new characters in it seemed interesting enough, but it felt like they'd just been introduced when the story was already over. And if the next volume is gonna take place in 1969, it looks like we ain't gonna see most of them again, except for Mina, Allan, Orlando, and possibly Janni. Speaking of her, while I thought she was cool, the plot device used to make her turn against the world was kinda too obvious and unimaginative. I thought it was sad that the whole book worked better as an introduction of characters we aren't gonna see again than as a proper story with a beginning and an end. I would've wanted to know what happens to Janni after she became the pirate queen; I guess it's still possible we find out in the next book.
Speaking of the characters, I think the original two series benefitted from using characters that are universally recognizable. The characters used here, especially Carnacki and the burglar fellow, were much more obscure, so while Moore did put them to good use, their metafictional resonance was lost on me. Also, while the idea of Orlando is intriguing, I think Moore overdid it. I guess when you're writing an immortal character who's been around for millennia, it's tempting to have him/her been there for every important event in history, but when you think about it, it's a bit ridiculous. It's kinda like those people who "find out" about their previous lives in hypnosis or something, and turns out their previous lives were always princes and princesses and adventurers and so on, never some regular chap who did boring things. So Orlando was mostly just a cipher for superhistorical "been there, done that" attitude, not as interesting as a character as s/he could've been (or as she was in the novel and the movie). But since s/he is quite likely to be around for the following chapters, maybe Moore can build on what we've seen here.
Btw, It was weird to see Moore introduce a conspiracy called "the Invisible College" which will summon a "moonchild" to usher a new aeon. I know these ideas long predate The Invisibles, but it still felt like there was some metafictional commentary towards Morrison in it. Morrison has often referred to Moore's work, but as far as I know Moore has pretty much ignored Morrison, might this be the first time he's acknowledged him?
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link
Orlando's history is pretty explictly laid out in the Black Dossier, dunno what yr complaining about there
― mr. strawman spotter (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 00:34 (fourteen years ago) link
he's complaining about how Orlando has to make a LOUD WINKING REFERENCE to hir history on every second page of 1910, and how this constitutes 93% of hir dialogue in the issue
― an terror has occurred (sic), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 03:36 (fourteen years ago) link
Exactly. I haven't read the Black Dossier, so maybe s/he is better fleshed out there, but in 1910 hir character is pretty much "the guy/girl who has been there at every important historical event", and not much else. And I think that's kind of a lazy way to write an immortal character. Compare that to the immortal dude in The Sandman, and you see what I mean: he'd done a few important things too, but you know, mostly just regular, mundane stuff. Of course it's possible Orlando is merely bragging, and s/he hasn't actually done everything s/he claims to have done, but so far the story hasn't given much proof for such an interpretation.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 09:14 (fourteen years ago) link
yr otm abt 1910, sadly :(
― The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 10:41 (fourteen years ago) link
Kinda wishing Moore'd just show us the stories he's hinted at in the Dossier, etc; the fight against the German League'd be a fantastic comic, prob better than the orig vol 2, and we're not going to see more of it than a fairly plain textual description. And tbh Moore's prose isn't all that great, esp when run down the borders of a comic book.
― The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 10:44 (fourteen years ago) link
I think the point Moore is making with Orlando's dialogue is that he/she's an obnoxious self-absorbed braggart. which is a reasonable outgrowth of he/she having been around longer than anyone else - Orlando's got a carefully cultivated sense of superiority and boredome ("yawn, seen it all before"). Kinda like an annoying music hipster who's always talking about how things were so much cooler way back when and all these new bands are just ripping off old bands, etc. Orlando clearly annoys the other Team members, you can see this social dynamic in action.
anyway I don't disagree that this largely felt like a "set-up" story, but it didn't bother me at all.
― mr. strawman spotter (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 20:39 (fourteen years ago) link
"Invisible College" is Aleister Crowley and co, yo.
― Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm happy to give Moore the benefit of the doubt for the next issue, but this was pretty unmemorable and indulgent.
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 22:25 (fourteen years ago) link
Morrison didn't make up the term Invisible College ya know
― mr. strawman spotter (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_College
― mr. strawman spotter (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 22:31 (fourteen years ago) link
Orlando annoys them so much they fuck hir
― The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Thursday, 10 December 2009 08:15 (fourteen years ago) link
Guys, did you read what I actually wrote:
I know these ideas long predate The Invisibles, but it still felt like there was some metafictional commentary towards Morrison in it.
I'm aware that "Invisible College", "Moonchild", and "a New Aeon" are not concepts Morrison came up with, but since they all are very important in The Invisibles, I felt that Moore mentioning them all within a couple of panels on the first page of 1910 could be a metafictional wink towards Morrison. (Just like Morrison has made metafictional winks towards Moore, even if he's never actually used his name or the names of Moore's works/characters.) Of course it's kinda hard to tell for sure before we find out what kind of a Moonchild the Invisible College in LOEG is summoning, and what kind of a New Aeon they want to bring forth.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 10 December 2009 09:45 (fourteen years ago) link
I think the point Moore is making with Orlando's dialogue is that he/she's an obnoxious self-absorbed braggart. which is a reasonable outgrowth of he/she having been around longer than anyone else - Orlando's got a carefully cultivated sense of superiority and boredome ("yawn, seen it all before").
This is the impression I got too, but that still doesn't change the fact that,A) apparently Orlando still has done all those awesome things, i.e. he's not making this shit up, andB) bragging about his extraordinary adventures is pretty much all s/he does in 1910.
I simply felt this is a kinda too obvious and lazy way to write an immortal character. If you compare Orlando to Hob Gadling in The Sandman, I think Gaiman had a more interesting approach to what being an immortal might be like.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 10 December 2009 09:51 (fourteen years ago) link
think moore wld be giving morrison a hostile finger rather than a friendly wink (ie they don't really 'get on')
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 10 December 2009 09:53 (fourteen years ago) link
Yeah, that's why I thought it might be interesting to see what kind of a reference to Morrison Moore might make. Morrison has obviously referred Moore's work several times (and not all of those references have been that friendly, see Zatanna #1 for example), but as far as I know this might be the first time Moore acknowledges Morrison.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 10 December 2009 09:56 (fourteen years ago) link
I really don't think it is even a sideways glance at Morrison. More likely, it is really all about Crowley; the Fall of 1910 was the Rites of Eleusis performances in London.
― EZ Snappin, Thursday, 10 December 2009 14:27 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^yes
― a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 December 2009 19:14 (fourteen years ago) link
I simply felt this is a kinda too obvious and lazy way to write an immortal character. If you compare Orlando to Hob Gadling in The Sandman
have you even read Orlando? Moore didn't make up this character.
― a triumph in high-tech nipple obfuscation (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 10 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link
the biggest problem is that it's BORING, we get the character trait and how it affects the group dynamic from one or two instances, Orlando could have said something else witty or self-obsessed or plot-developing or annoying on the other 61 pages
(I mean, it didn't shit me as much as it does T-dogg, but I totally get where he's coming from)
― an terror has occurred (sic), Thursday, 10 December 2009 22:30 (fourteen years ago) link