Marvel Comics blabbery

i dunno, so finding the loose, unfocused style enjoyable and not a hard marvel sell, but def not something i could see ppl not already invested in being fans off

I tried watching that other episode, but it’s just sooo slooowwww...

Like, why not capture the zing & zest of comics at least a little bit?

My kid’s watching the first episode, about the Japanese Spider-Man tv series from the ’70s... It’s actually pretty interesting.

Just a note that the FF:Road Trip one-off from last week is worth checking out. Well-written (by Halt & Catch Fire guy Christopher Cantwell) and gruey and fun at the same time, a very "makes it look easy" sort of comic.

Oh, that's how he's known? I've been digging his Doctor Doom ongoing, was wondering how he suddenly just started writing a bunch of mid-tier Marvel titles this year

from chip zdarsky, i lol'd

Marvel has decided to bring back Marvel Two-In-One with me as writer again, but this time the “Two” is talking heads and action and the “One” is the story. Will we be successful? Absolutely not, but I could really use the paycheck.

I bought the first TPB collection of the new Spider-Woman series – it’s not good, just some origin retcon BS.

Meanwhile, I’m fleshing out my Kate Bishops via eBay before the Steinfeld Chronicles drives the prices of those up.

i like zdarsky but wish his comics were as interesting and funny as his public personality

like, as a writer, he's basically just a more-interesting charles soule

I'm a steady fan from Sex Criminals and his Peter Parker, Spider-Man run. Will get around to reading Daredevil at some point

oh, i think his artwork is great. i wish he'd be less dignified and more himself as a writer

He wrote the Spider-Man run! Give it a shot, it's largely goofy fun Spidey-times. Mainly involving Pete's secret sister joining continuity and the big secret identity reveal to JJJ -> hijinx.

There’s an episode on women comics creators that looks interesting, tho I fear it may reverberate with the sound of Marvel patting itself on the back.

I think the episode is really worth watching for long-time Marvel fans. Obviously the whole series is mostly uncritical of Marvel as a company, so you'll have to accept that, but this particular episode has interviews of people like Nocenti, Louise Simonson, and June Brigman, none of whom I've ever seen interviewed in a proper documentary. It has, among other things, a lovely scene of Nocenti and Simonson getting together and reminiscing on what it was like working in the male-dominated bullpen in the 1980s. Of course they also interview newer creators like G. Willow Wilson and Kelly Sue DeConnick too, but for me it was particularly touching to hear the stories the older generation of women, whose comics I grew up with, from the era before Marvel really started to diversify their roster.

In fact, all of the episodes of "Marvel's 616" are pretty well-made, and have a fairly varied approach to their subjects, so IMO the whole series is worth watching out. Another standout was the cosplay episode, they did a great job of finding a diverse group on interviewees, and showing how for them cosplay can be a way of positively affirming, for example, their queerness or Black identity.

what the fuck

https://bleedingcool.com/comics/joe-bennett-apologises-over-immortal-hulk-43-anti-semitic-error/

they’ve failed to notice spelling errors in the lettered dialogue, so.... I’m not surprised editorial didn’t catch it

he said that was a Cronenberg nod - what's it referring to?

the name of the store was Cronenberg, which people read as an intentional dig as a "jewish name"
lots of diamond district stores have stars of david and i could see "Jewery" done backwards as an honest if catastrophic mistake. if anybody put up any resistance on a recall my spidey sense would go off but i think this was just a particularly dumb error. I hope!

oh lol. Cronenberg was misspelled too

xp I had a quick Google Street View drive-by (47th street, between 5th and 6th avenue) and couldn't see any - but then there's some artistic license in that the shops don't have anything much written on the windows, because it'd get in the way of the jewelry!

i'll amend that to "less prominent stars of david;" i imagine part of why the "our bad" response wasn't taken entirely at face value is pushing that imagery is stereotypical in any case.

you know, you watch Uncut Gems and try to do an unsubtle diamond merchant sketch and fuck it up three ways...

Long piece on Marvel's history (I haven't read it yet) - https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/02/15/who-really-created-the-marvel-universe

Kim O'Connor read it so I didn't have to risk my blood pressure reading praise for R13sman

It's a really cogent and balanced explainer! Until the very end, where it's just like..... I genuinely don't know where to start pic.twitter.com/5ezJpZsIcL

— Kim O'Connor (@shallowbrigade) February 9, 2021

I didn't expect to see a former ILXor namechecked in that

so should I read his book?

hasn't Old Lunch also been reading Every Marvel Ever?

so should I read his book?

Still curious about Douglas' book, not about Abrah4m's.

Wolk is always good value, imo. Wish he would return to these parts.

I've been making the effort, morrisp (made it as far as the early '70s, and then started plowing through the daunting volume of the past eight years or so), but I do not have his fortitude/focus.

The linked article is pretty decent though

Another article about the career of Lee, that takes AR's book as its only source, and repeatedly reads between the lines to tease out startling conclusions that Lee may have overstated his contributions, abilities, beliefs and creativity. Imagine the reviewer's potential shock if she'd consulted a second source!

https://newrepublic.com/article/161130/stan-lee-true-believer-marvel-comics-review

TwoMorrows put out a book recently called Stuf' Said! which chronologically plots Lee & Kirby interview snippets re: attribution.

https://twomorrows.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1513

I only noticed yesterday that ILX's very own Al Ewing has gotten a gig of writing Guardians of the Galaxy! Has anyone read it, is it good? Ewing + cosmic Marvel feels like the best possible combination to me, IMO his Ultimates run was the best thing he's done for the company.

Immortal Hulk!

Yes, that one is very good too, I just love the cosmic stuff more. I've never been that interested in occult themes, so the whole Satan thing he's doing there has left me cold, as good as the series is otherwise.

he also writes SWORD iirc

We Only Find Them When They’re Dead is a good read btw

Amazing piece of Houseroyism in the Hollywood Reporter: in which Roy argues the R13sm4n bio to be a hit piece because he finds it 95% fair and accurate but 5% mean to Stan.

Thomas argues that it's absolutely unfair to suggest that Kirby did nearly all the writing on the Lee/Kirby comics, because one uncontested primary source exists: Lee's written plot for Fantastic Four #8. By Roy's account, this consists of "three longish paragraphs," containing no dialogue, but "complete with Reed Richards trying to stretch his malleable arms far enough to save a man falling from a building but not quite reaching him, so that the Human Torch has to catch him on the fly," and a subplot about Richards wanting to restore the Thing's human form.

He acknowledges that Kirby wraps up the three-paragraph plot in seven pages, while the story goes on for 13. He brings up the fact that the "yarn's ending as printed" recalls one in a Kirby story from the 1950s, but argues that this makes it likely that Stan dictated a second synopsis over the phone to Kirby, rather than that Jack repeated himself.

Elsewhere, the rascally one argues that it was fair to not pay the artists for writing, because they could go and starve if they didn't like it, and anyway the writers were paid worse. Thomas also argues virtuously that the Marvel Method was fair, because as editor-in-chief, he wouldn't have hired a writer who didn't partly plot over the phone, "so an artist could make some money by starting work a day or so sooner on a story."

A true classic of the genre.

Interesting article on Lee’s dalliances with Hollywood as an actor by Riesman, which sidesteps the issue of comics authorship entirely but is telling in its own way: https://www.polygon.com/movies/22289175/stan-lee-cameos-non-marvel-movies

I think Roy Thomas always comes at this from the wrong angle, by concentrating on “what does the physical evidence say” as opposed to “was Stan Lee an inveterate bullshitter.” I’d ask whether whether a guy who called himself “one-take Lee” because he thought he nailed it in one, and didn’t bother listening to his friends when they told him about where to look when on camera, would have been that much more invested in managing the plots of comics when he’d already written up a short summary.

Lee’s legacy is locked in. Kirby and others had been trying to claw back a piece of the credit they’d likely deserved, for decades, without a lot of traction. Questioning that legacy now still doesn’t do much to change his stature.

I think Roy Thomas is just trying to get the details cataloged, the guy has spent quite a bit of time trying to get some of the details of that whole period of American comics history captured in general. That being, you have to take that his opinion is as someone who was actively involved with those issues and his own point of view. If viewed as a rap battle, he's definitely one side of the beef.

I haven't been reading a ton of issues, but I have read Roy Thomas Daredevil run and his Hulk run in the past months. There is some good late 60s wacky goodness in those comics. That issue of the Hulk where Tom Wolf shows up and Valkrie is in the story is one of the strangest comics of the time.

I think Roy Thomas always comes at this from the wrong angle, by concentrating on “what does the physical evidence say” as opposed to “was Stan Lee an inveterate bullshitter.”

also the physical evidence that he's citing shows the exact opposite of his claim!

He does make a case that implies he has never watched a legal show on television

haha, they've decided to screw comic shops harder than DC

looks like it's more they're thinking that Diamond will be bankrupt soon?

Signed non-exclusively with Penguin/Random House for direct market and bookstore distro from October 1st. Press release highlights

After a thorough analysis of the market environment, Marvel has chosen PRHPS as its distribution partner to create a sustainable, productive supply chain and enhanced infrastructure for Marvel publications that will benefit comics retailers and fans alike for years to come. Penguin Random House is known for its state-of-the-art multi-ranging services that enable independent booksellers to increase efficiency and profitability.

and

Penguin Random House is a free-freight company, allowing retailers to simplify their business models while alleviating the volatility and complexity of reducing freight costs and planning. Through many of PRH’s standard offerings, like its rapid replenishment program for graphic novels and advanced supply chain, Direct Market retailers will experience more flexibility to manage inventory and stock their stores to best serve their customers.

Direct Market retailers can choose to order Marvel products direct from PRH, or alternatively, through Diamond as a wholesaler under terms established by Diamond in the US and the UK. Hachette Book Group will continue to manage distribution of Marvel’s graphic novels and trade collections to the book market.

So Penguin is distributing to comic shops while Hachette distributes the same product to bookstores? Seems weird.

They're signed exclusively with PRH, anyone else (ie Diamond) will have to buy from PRH and then distribute from there.

The discount being cut down to 50% across the board is the screwing shops harder bit - DC didn't fuck with margins at least.

IIRC, Penguin won't charge for shipping so that's the incentive over Diamond?
And milo, you're saying the discount is overall worse than it was with Diamond?
Third - I assume this isn't another Heroes World-type debacle since it's unlikely PRH will go down in flames.

and god help us for the inevitable shipping fuck-ups that will occur in Oct

Yes - shops of any size were getting 55-56% (up to 58%ish at very high tiers) on Marvel comics and trades via Diamond. For big launches, Marvel would run promotions that would take that up another 15%. Now they're all at 50%. Diamond shipping wasn't eating up 5-8% unless you're located in Alaska.

It also means that the discounts and shipping are going to be worse for manga, Boom/IDW/Dark Horse/Image/etc. with less weight to spread around sans Marvel. Theoretically you could keep buying Marvel from Diamond but now you've gone from 56% and 2% shipping to 50% max and 2% shipping - no way to make that make sense.

This seems to pretty clearly be Marvel getting a better deal from Penguin because Penguin doesn't discount as much, not anything to do with Diamond's future prospects.