And thx for that ICV2 article, sic
― Nhex, Tuesday, 30 March 2021 15:39 (three years ago) link
James Romberger on the R13sman Stan Lee bio, from a Kirbyist perspective.
― armoured van, Holden (sic), Tuesday, 30 March 2021 18:52 (three years ago) link
More from ICV2: Griepp on PRPH's long-term plans.
― armoured van, Holden (sic), Friday, 2 April 2021 21:23 (three years ago) link
I do think Marvel is probably leaving some cash on the table by not having some stuff that sells in continual print. Local shop stated that he about quit ordering back list trades from Diamond as they were shite for showing stuff in stock and never getting the stuff until like 13 weeks later.
Deal they SHOULD do is setup way that the guy can buy at the store and drop ship to their house and throw a few shillings to the local dude for making the order happen.
I think the smart idea that talking to my local shop owner is that he thinks the dudes in Image should put together their own indie distribution partnership, possibly tied to selling McFarlene's and others toy business and then become an indie distributor. Partner up with some people that know how to warehouse and ship stuff.
― earlnash, Friday, 2 April 2021 21:53 (three years ago) link
on point 2: that's kind of the bookshop.org model right now, i think. kinda wish my LCS got in on that
― Nhex, Friday, 2 April 2021 22:07 (three years ago) link
No one really wants to order comics from a bunch of different places - it's workable with trades but comics are a weekly order where subscriptions and special orders keep you alive. Too easy to miss ordering issue 3 because you got busy.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Saturday, 3 April 2021 00:21 (three years ago) link
I just started reading the 2012 Matt Fraction / David Aja Hawkeye series, and hot damn it is good. (Bought Vol 1 waaaaaay back in 2013, never read it until now.) Surprisingly the trades seem to be out of print. Any chance or news that it'll be reprinted ahead of the Disney+ series coming out? Otherwise I'll just buy the omnibus for $25 digitally, but I'd rather own physical copies.
― Nhex, Monday, 5 April 2021 03:42 (three years ago) link
I recently bought a nice copy of Vol. 3 (L.A. Woman) for $4.95 on eBay. You could try picking up the individual volumes that way, if you don’t mind remainders etc.
― come along you starbucks lovers (taylor’s version) (morrisp), Monday, 5 April 2021 04:10 (three years ago) link
good point... i'll look on eBay as well. weirdly, vol. 2 seems to be the most rare/expensive volume out of the four.
― Nhex, Monday, 5 April 2021 04:26 (three years ago) link
Surprisingly the trades seem to be out of print.
🤔
― armoured van, Holden (sic), Monday, 5 April 2021 05:42 (three years ago) link
I'd guess that there's a good chance we get another reprint around when the show drops. Marvel is at least getting better at taking advantage of the release of big film and TV projects to push out related print material. We got two Black Widow Epic Collections last year, two Morbius Epics, they reprinted at least one of the old Vision and Scarlet Witch minis (it looks like the other collection might've been solicited and then either cancelled or delayed) plus a couple of related WCA Epics, and they have an omnibus of Rick Remender's Cap run (featuring Sam's first appearances as Cap) coming soon. You can generally expect a collection or two of something related, but given how closely related the Hawkeye show appears to be to Fraction's run, I'd be surprised if we didn't see a reprint of that specific material.
― You Can't Have the Woogie Without a Little Boogie (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 April 2021 11:19 (three years ago) link
I wonder how much of an uptick in sales they see (in related print material) when these movies and shows come out.
― come along you starbucks lovers (taylor’s version) (morrisp), Monday, 5 April 2021 14:48 (three years ago) link
#10 was the first Ta-Naheisi Coates Black Panther book from 2016; this sold 36,000 the year before when the movie was out, dropping to 7500 this year.
not the same female Captain Marvel so maybe unrelated
#4 was the first volume of Ms Marvel, from 2014. 11k sold.
― armoured van, Holden (sic), Monday, 5 April 2021 19:15 (three years ago) link
Definitely unrelated. Kamala Khan seems to be one of the few legit breakout Marvel superstars of the 21st Century (see also: Miles Morales).
― You Can't Have the Woogie Without a Little Boogie (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 April 2021 20:01 (three years ago) link
Got me curious so I glimpsed the Diamond Top 100 from 2019. Infinity Gauntlet is the the obvious standout, but nothing else I saw from Marvel was a classic reprint, mostly brand new collections of 2018 material (Spider-Geddon, Life of Captain Marvel, Cosmic Ghost Rider) or disconnected from the MCU (House/Powers of X, Immortal Hulk).
Non-Marvel media tie-ins of note that showed up: The Boys omnibus reprints (Amazon show), Umbrella Academy trades (Netflix show), Joker (Azzarello/Bermejo) reprint (film), Deadly Class (SyFy show). So I believe the strategy likely does work, maybe Marvel's doing a crappy job at embracing it?
(this doesn't include bookstore sales, since it's Diamond, i assume)
― Nhex, Monday, 5 April 2021 20:06 (three years ago) link
Marvel's reprint strategy seems haphazard at best, I will grant you. If you're anal like me and make sure that you preorder pretty much everything you want (and, perhaps more importantly, have a clear idea of what you want and how what you want is being collected), they do a pretty great job and seem serious about slowly reprinting as much of their material as possible. If you come at it from a more casual angle, I'm sure it's incredibly frustrating both to keep track of how things are being reprinted and to deal with the inevitable and ongoing OOP issue.
― You Can't Have the Woogie Without a Little Boogie (Old Lunch), Monday, 5 April 2021 20:12 (three years ago) link
good to know they’re still living in opposite world where casual readers who’d want to pick up a TPB are out of luck
I’d hazard a guess that they sell a fair number of TPBs to libraries? those few that still have a budget
― mh, Monday, 5 April 2021 20:22 (three years ago) link
the Kamala Khan Ms. Marvel is definitely librarian bait! in a good way
― mh, Monday, 5 April 2021 20:23 (three years ago) link
Definitely unrelated.
Right, though looks like Black Panther barely was too: 28k in 2018 without a movie, 36k with a movie. the Kamala Khan book sold 13k in 2018 (and, because Marvel, no other volumes charted in either year).
― armoured van, Holden (sic), Monday, 5 April 2021 20:35 (three years ago) link
xp Kamala K. was the first book I picked up when I got into nu-Marvel in the mid-2000s... it was getting significant mainstream / "general reader, check this out" press.
― come along you starbucks lovers (taylor’s version) (morrisp), Monday, 5 April 2021 20:38 (three years ago) link
It was a pretty decent series but got derailed a lot by crossover events like Secret Wars and Civil War II
― Nhex, Monday, 5 April 2021 20:41 (three years ago) link
Yeah, I read few books and then hit the Secret Wars wall. (I also couldn't really get into the teenage-focused content, but that's just me.)
― come along you starbucks lovers (taylor’s version) (morrisp), Monday, 5 April 2021 20:44 (three years ago) link
Lolz
Do I really live in a universe where Ta-Nehisi Coates has written a Captain America comic featuring a parody of my ideas as part of the philosophy of the arch villain Red Skull? https://t.co/waFsAvWlfd— Dr Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) April 6, 2021
― groovypanda, Tuesday, 6 April 2021 12:43 (three years ago) link
oh no, he found out
― mh, Tuesday, 6 April 2021 12:46 (three years ago) link
A guy published this blog post(I don’t get how he isolated the logos; did he redraw them?); Tom Orz popped into his Twitter, suggesting he credit the original designers.
― Yawnsomely Literal Cover Band (morrisp), Saturday, 17 April 2021 04:20 (three years ago) link
it's not that hard to isolate text with solid borders using photoshop or any other software with a magnet selection tool
― mh, Saturday, 17 April 2021 17:09 (three years ago) link
https://reaganray.com/img/blog/marvel-lettering/doctor-strange-3.jpg
From that post, this Doctor Strange logo from 1988 feels like it's homaging some TV show or movie logo from the same era, but I can't quite recall which one... Can anyone think of a logo similar to it?
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 27 April 2021 08:37 (three years ago) link
no, but I'd bet $7 that logo is by Todd Klein
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 09:48 (three years ago) link
Hmm. Klein pegs the then-recently-revealed movie Strange logo as based on his 1988 logo in this 2014 blog, buuut the original logo he shows looks more '90s to me.
This 1988 Marvel Doctor Strange #1 has the logo posted above, and the next movie logo was just released the other day, and looks like a very close adaptation of the (real) 1988 one.
That one only lasted four issues before being replaced with a riff on the 1970s logo; Klein's (other?) one is indeed from 1992, and came in on issue 62 of the '88 series.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 10:05 (three years ago) link
xxp Tuomas, I assume you're not thinking of the (current-day) Stranger Things logo(?)
― smoking grass, poor caddying. (morrisp), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 15:37 (three years ago) link
i love that logo and that era of doctor strange
― Draymond is "Mr Dumpy" (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 16:54 (three years ago) link
https://i.redd.it/ciex4a8ta1vz.png
I can see it.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 21:40 (three years ago) link
Stranger Things titles are more of an homage to the typography of '80s horror paperback covers (and Stephen King specifically).
― You Can't Have the Woogie Without a Little Boogie (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 22:21 (three years ago) link
Right, I just wondered if the vague similarities (stacked script + "Strange") may have tripped T's neurons.
― smoking grass, poor caddying. (morrisp), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 22:23 (three years ago) link
Heavily dipped serifs, the dramatic, swooping cross-bar on the A, the Stranger Things letterforms look closer in height to the actually-tall Doctor Strange bcz of the high crossbar on the H - a lot of casual similarities, intentionality completely aside.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 22:33 (three years ago) link
Dr. Stranger
― mh, Tuesday, 27 April 2021 22:36 (three years ago) link
Stranger Docts
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 27 April 2021 23:22 (three years ago) link
I think comics logos are underappreciated, but that blog post doesn’t really do them justice… I feel like you need to see them full-size, on the actual covers, to really get the impact; not abstracted and isolated in tiny squares.
― smoking grass, poor caddying. (morrisp), Wednesday, 28 April 2021 02:41 (three years ago) link
Like the classic ASM logo (especially when accented with webbing) is one of the GOAT, but this anemic image hardly captures why:https://reaganray.com/img/blog/marvel-lettering/spider-man-1.jpg
― smoking grass, poor caddying. (morrisp), Wednesday, 28 April 2021 02:43 (three years ago) link
agreed
― Nhex, Wednesday, 28 April 2021 02:44 (three years ago) link
Got a bunch of TPBs of ImmorTAL Hulk and the current Marvel TPB is a thin and anaemic looking thing.
― Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Wednesday, 28 April 2021 05:48 (three years ago) link
technically speaking this isn't that similar but in terms of era and general vibe the Doctor Strange logo made me think of this:
https://tvseriesfinale.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/murder-she-wrote-e1513781745389.jpg
― joygoat, Wednesday, 28 April 2021 12:52 (three years ago) link
The Doctor Strange logo looks like the sign for a fern bar in Dallas
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Thursday, 29 April 2021 04:03 (three years ago) link
From a couple of weeks ago, Hibbs going long on the PRH situation and repurcussions:
But this is the crux of my fear: Diamond, on the face of it, would not seem to be able to pivot to a more modern GN distribution business structure now that they’ve lost the majority of their volume, and the reasons that most DM retailers had to deal with them. They could have, once – but now it’s probably too late. While Steve and his team are smart, and conceptually Steve has resources that could be liquidated to keep things going for a while, it is very hard for me to see where the payout can possibly be. We know what happens to a distributor who loses both Marvel and DC’s business, and have Image comics as their largest exclusive vendor...
ultimately my biggest fear is that the vanguard of independence for making comics, the ability of a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or a Bone or even a Walking Dead to rise up “out of nowhere” and to build that periodical behemoth which then allows indy creators to leverage the book format, is about to be severely tested, and perhaps entirely lost. And while people will find a way to make comics –of course they will –the likeliest result is going to be that comics will start to pay a lot less for creators as a general class, and comics will get “safer” and less experimental as even more corporate control is consolidated. I’d rather that Eastman & Laird or Jeff Smith or Robert Kirkman & co are the ones who get to reap the rewards nstead of giant multi-national corporations – and this has always been the greatest promise as well as the greatest gift of the Direct Market.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Sunday, 2 May 2021 00:58 (three years ago) link
I kinda get what he's saying, but... thankfully, many young creators aren't waiting for a big publisher to print floppies for them anymore and see (or have been forced to find) the other outlets available.
― Nhex, Sunday, 2 May 2021 03:36 (three years ago) link
His three examples are 37, 30, and 18 years old. Utterly irrelevant to the current market.
― EZ Snappin, Sunday, 2 May 2021 04:05 (three years ago) link
As someone who thinks well-printed, well-designed comics are the ideal presentation for the medium, I wish that a retail infrastructure for them will continue to exist.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Sunday, 2 May 2021 04:15 (three years ago) link
https://www.gamesradar.com/wandavision-success-leads-to-continued-comic-sellouts-and-back-orders/
(apparently Newsarama is GamesRadar now)
Ahead of WandaVision's debut on January 15, Marvel Comics' collections department printed new editions for two books - The Vision Complete Collection, and House of M - as well as three new collections of older material - Scarlet Witch by James Robinson: The Complete Collection, Vision & Scarlet Witch: The Saga of Wanda and Vision, and Marvel-Verse: Wanda & Vision.The response was quick, as by the end of WandaVision's first season in March most of these comics had sold out at the distributor level - with new printings not becoming available again until a month after the show ends.Now that we're a few months out from WandaVision's finale and Marvel Comics is re-initiating new plans for Wanda (such as the Darkhold comic book event), Newsarama checked in again to see if collections of these stories of Wanda and Vision's past are any easier for customers to get.Unfortunately, these five collections are still hard to come by. The printings from earlier this year have all sold out at the distributor level for comic shops, and most are either unavailable on Amazon or only at a mark-up from second-party sellers.Marvel-Verse: Wanda & Vision(Image credit: Marvel Comics)The Eisner-winning The Vision Complete Collection has gone through multiple printings since its November 2019 debut. The last printing hit shelves in April and sold out in two months, with another new printing scheduled for July 21.Marvel-Verse: Wanda & Vision apparently sold out in March, then again in May. A third printing is scheduled to debut July 28.The three other collections - Vision & Scarlet Witch: The Saga of Wanda & Vision, House of M, and Scarlet Witch by James Robinson: The Complete Collection - have also sold out at the distributor level, however Marvel has not announced plans to reprint them despite the apparent demand.The other new collection of older material, Vision & Scarlet Witch: The Saga of Wanda & Vision, sold out quickly after its January 2021 debut. It's currently on back order, with no announced plans by Marvel to reprint it despite the apparent demand.
The response was quick, as by the end of WandaVision's first season in March most of these comics had sold out at the distributor level - with new printings not becoming available again until a month after the show ends.
Now that we're a few months out from WandaVision's finale and Marvel Comics is re-initiating new plans for Wanda (such as the Darkhold comic book event), Newsarama checked in again to see if collections of these stories of Wanda and Vision's past are any easier for customers to get.
Unfortunately, these five collections are still hard to come by. The printings from earlier this year have all sold out at the distributor level for comic shops, and most are either unavailable on Amazon or only at a mark-up from second-party sellers.
Marvel-Verse: Wanda & Vision(Image credit: Marvel Comics)
The Eisner-winning The Vision Complete Collection has gone through multiple printings since its November 2019 debut. The last printing hit shelves in April and sold out in two months, with another new printing scheduled for July 21.
Marvel-Verse: Wanda & Vision apparently sold out in March, then again in May. A third printing is scheduled to debut July 28.
The three other collections - Vision & Scarlet Witch: The Saga of Wanda & Vision, House of M, and Scarlet Witch by James Robinson: The Complete Collection - have also sold out at the distributor level, however Marvel has not announced plans to reprint them despite the apparent demand.
The other new collection of older material, Vision & Scarlet Witch: The Saga of Wanda & Vision, sold out quickly after its January 2021 debut. It's currently on back order, with no announced plans by Marvel to reprint it despite the apparent demand.
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Wednesday, 16 June 2021 20:44 (three years ago) link
They're very good at this.
― Jerome Percival Jesus (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 June 2021 22:58 (three years ago) link
you can't spell "permanently unavailable, leaving retailers and customers alike muttering bitterly" without Perlmutter
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Wednesday, 16 June 2021 23:14 (three years ago) link