Marvel's Narnia Fumetti

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=074ad588a08c54c27c7b41987fd8592b&threadid=52853

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 19 December 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

If they start just using digipulated photographs, what will happen to Alex Ross¿

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

"This is like a multi-million dollar version of Jackie."

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

A comic that costs "millions of dollars" to produce? This can't be a good thing.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

Additionally, when asked about the project costing "millions," the writer told Newsarama: "No, this isn't costing millions. It's costing a lot of money and, as far as I'm aware, this six issue series will probably be the most expensive and ambitious thing Marvel has ever tried. But we've tried to be clever about this and the art team have managed to do the most amazing things within a sensible budget. It's obviously a gamble in publishing terms because we haven't seen a superhero comic like this before, but everyone is confident we're doing something good and will make the money back in the comics, the trade and the hardcover. It's very exciting."

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)

Mark Millar & hyperbole in the same article? You're shitting me!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

Coincidentally, I just wandered over to our picture desk and they have several large Al3x R0xx print-outs on the desk, to go with a review of "Mythology."

*shudders, etc*

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

So wait, it costs millions, but doesn't "cost millions"? Which is it, man? MAKE UP YOUR MIND!

But will Marshall Mathers make an appearance?

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

Sounds fun, although the Gilliam-tribute/rippoff-plot doesn't sound devastatingly exciting, does it? It's going to need to hit on both fronts (i.e. good story as well as non-idiotic art) not to escape complete ridicule. Otherwise, it'll presumably be the usual pattern: brief feature in the arts section of the NYT, forgotten by the rest of the outside world by a month later. But I hope it will be good.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 19 December 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

I am hoping for a guest appearance by Sergeant Streetwise in this 'fumetti'.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.