1963 has uninterrupted Veitch homages, the letters pages, Al's Stan parodies, etc, etc…
Supreme has Veitch 50s/60s/Neal Adams homages contrasted with '90s Liefieldiana, and what?
on your marks…
( I love the phrase sadface—did you guys come up with it?)
― veronica moser (veronica moser), Friday, 10 February 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
I've never actually read AM's Supreme, but my tastes skew more towards primo Silver Age angsty pants than mid-50s Superman shenanigans, so 1963 is the one for me, effendi!
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 February 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
(And David, Supreme is 10000% Silver Age!)
― kit brash (kit brash), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
― veronica moser (veronica moser), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Saturday, 11 February 2006 03:34 (nineteen years ago)
On the other hand, the one episode of Supreme I read was COMPLETE RUBBISH. So 1963 wins.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)
just asking…
― veronica moser (veronica moser), Sunday, 12 February 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Monday, 13 February 2006 00:38 (nineteen years ago)
Alan Moore, yes. I saw it, saw it was written by Alan Moore, saw it was about an ALTERNATE WORLD where the Confederates had won the Civil War, and then I read it.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 13 February 2006 11:35 (nineteen years ago)