― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 28 May 2006 08:58 (nineteen years ago)
SOmeone at the newspaper drew that Batwoman though, right?
― Pete (Pete), Sunday, 28 May 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 28 May 2006 10:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Sunday, 28 May 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)
That's pretty much what that newspaper headline is, though.
― Vic F (Vic Fluro), Sunday, 28 May 2006 10:49 (nineteen years ago)
― electro-acoustic lycanthrope (orion), Sunday, 28 May 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)
― c(''c) (Leee), Sunday, 28 May 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 28 May 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Christopher Goondight, Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:16 (nineteen years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 08:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Vic F (Vic Fluro), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 08:19 (nineteen years ago)
Of course batsuits have on the whole been designed by Batman, which might explain why the recent and no longer Batgirl's costume was so illfitting.
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 11:38 (nineteen years ago)
bbc frontpage summary: "Holy makeover! Batwoman returns as 'lipstick lesbian'"
― tom west (thomp), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Warlock Magazine (Warlock Magazine), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
Particularly poor use of 'like', there.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Warlock Magazine (Warlock Magazine), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 08:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)