― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 23 June 2006 03:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Richard Baez (Johnny Logic), Friday, 23 June 2006 04:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Deric W. Haircare (Deric W. Haircare), Friday, 23 June 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
― ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ (chaki), Saturday, 24 June 2006 02:35 (nineteen years ago)
There are times when I think that Veitch might be my favorite comics artist ever. Despite the chaff.
― Deric W. Haircare (Deric W. Haircare), Saturday, 24 June 2006 02:39 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Saturday, 24 June 2006 03:01 (nineteen years ago)
Did the guy who got his nose cut off remind anyone else of Ord from the Breakworld? or was that just me
― Laurah (laurah), Saturday, 24 June 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Saturday, 24 June 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)
I'm not entirely sure I'd have liked it better by the omission of the words, either. Ambitious, yes, and we need more of that sort of creative ambition in comics, but I'm not quite sure CAN'T GET NO hit the mark it was looking for.
Back in the day, I was a huge fan of Veitch's florid prose, and Moore's for that matter. If you cornered me with torches and pitchforks, I'd probably admit that they overdid it and the kind of restraint that Moore showed in captioning WATCHMEN (as opposed to SWAMP THING) served the work better. I'd have admired CAN'T GET NO for having balls of steel had the captioning been left off altogether and maybe putting the text in an appendix at the end if he felt it absolutely necessary. As it is, I'd call it a remarkable work, but I'm not so sure it's going to be quoted in five or ten years.
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Saturday, 24 June 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Saturday, 24 June 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)