― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm liking the series so far, though it's a strange like - the story gains a lot of its strength and momentum off the 40+/50+ year backstory of all these characters (as much for the emotional resonance re: Sue Dinby's tragedies as the actual plot machinations), yet Meltzer's been vocal in his aim to "reclaim" this history & these characters and refashion it so as to divorce these things from their quaint, naive origins, and that rankles me a bit.
Not because these characters shouldn't be or can't be "updated" in this way, but because trying to recast these stories from a different generation to belong to the current generation (and, in essence, rewriting history) is a back-handed way of saying that what came before wasn't good enough to work today - instead of working w/ the lemons, they done gone out & bought Coke. That's 50 types of bullshit, of course, because these characters wouldn't even exist right now were it not for what came prior. But, then, this is the same argument that continuity-phreaks trot out when bitching about revamps & retconns & all sorts of things (for instance, all the hubbub re: Mark Waid's _Superman: Birthright_ mini-series now being THE ORIGIN for Superman), so I'll abstain from flogging this poor horse any more.
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Of course, it goes w/out saying that I hope this reconciliation of Silver Age poofery w/ "serious" modern-age storytelling involves Black Lois Lane.
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 30 July 2004 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Friday, 30 July 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Friday, 30 July 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)
Anyway, I'm still reserving judgment on IC... I'm not impressed so far, it's kinda sub-Boccho superhero stuff, tasteless enough to be uncomfortable, not tasteless enough to be fun.
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck, Friday, 30 July 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)
You guys have all read Lying In The Gutters, yes?
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 27 September 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Monday, 27 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Monday, 27 September 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm very curious as to the content of this Barry Allen letter though.
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 27 September 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Monday, 27 September 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)
what a way with words
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― Ma Meltzer-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)
BTW, I can't see that pic yet - I'm guessing it's the Kyle Baker Batman thing, tho?
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)
And I hereby introduce the motion to proclaim "Rags" a suck.
― Leeeeeeeee (Leee), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 26 September 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 6 October 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)
Finally read. It's okay? I guess?
― forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, that's about right. ;_; <--- LOOK IT IS SADFACE
― David R., Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
: : : : : : : : : : ;_; <-- ELONGATED SADFACE
― David R., Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
YOU FOOLS
― David R., Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)
i am rofling at Elongo Sadface.
― Dr. Superman, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
AYE - 's like Rags Morales drew on my screen.
― R Baez, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
I like how in the latest All New Atom, when they talk about Jean Loring, they show her as Eclipso, as if Eclipso killed Sue Dibny, as if Identiy Crisis has already been retconned ala Parallax.
― Dr. Superman, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)