Shipping This Week! - 04.09.01

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
September comes in like a box full of Pogs. Flip flip flip flip.

Could someone please tell Marvel that they're overestimating the appeal of the Hulk? This week's offer of the first issue of a Thing / Hulk mini-series makes for the THIRD Hulk offering in the past month (including TWO DOUBLE-SIZED ISSUES). Never mind that Bruce Jones + Hulk + mini-series = zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzonk. Also, grabbing Jae Lee to draw 4 issues of rock-'em sock-'em orange-rock-on-gamma-green action makes as much sense as tapping Jim Balent for an extra special issue of _Optic Nerve_.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, maybe it makes a little more sense than that, but you see where I'm coming from, yes?

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Last week = We3 + X-Statix + Promethea + Astonishing + Sleeper + Hellblazer = best week ever (okay, Hellblazer was just very good).

This week = Y, and that's it. What's anyone else getting? Is Scratch, or Swamp Thing, or Captain America vs The Falcon good?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I'll post, and THEN I'll get to work.

MY LIST O' GOODNESS: Avengers, Thor (because I MUST KNOW how the Avengers are Disassembled!), Birds of Prey, Y, CA & Falcon, Ultimate Spidey. Also curious about Gambit & Jubliee, because of the folks writing them (John Layman on the former, Robert Kirkman on the latter), and, sure, maybe some of that residual Marvel Zombification from my mid-pubescent years still lingers.

I like _CA & The Falcon_, though I think a lot of my like comes from having Priest muck around in a high(er) profile sandbox. Also, Joe Bennett's art is fantastic. I'm mildly perturbed that Bart Sears decided to get all stupid w/ the first 4 issues of the series - if JB was around from the get-go, things (like the first TPB, duh) would definitely look a lot better.

I believe Tep is the go-to-guy regarding _Swamp Thing_. As for _Scratch_, I've been wary of anything Sam Kieth's done since the first issue of the 2nd _Zero Girl_ mini doggled my boon, and I'm especially wary of the way the mini's been presented - "it's a werewolf story! and look kids Batman's in it, too!"

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Show me a kid who'll consider Batman cooler than werewolves and I'll show you an AGE TRAITOR!

Is CA & The Falcon as good as Black Panther? I fear that I've picked up the "all Priest comics are doomed, better not bother" meme.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know if it's as good - if anything, it's more low-key. One of the things I liked about BP was how cavalier Priest was - you had Mephisto hanging out in a Brooklyn apartment, you had BP beating Mephisto in a fistfight, you had modern-day BP interacting with Kirby BP, all sorts of time travel paradoxical shenanigans, and lots of things I'm forgetting. And let's not forget the narrative tricks (or trick?). Since BP was a low-profile guy, Priest could try more stuff, and get away with it (and succeed on a grand scale!) - working on a keystone character like Cap, I get the feeling that he's either constrained by editorial mandates, or he could be reining himself in a bit.

Though there is a little love thang happening between Cap & the Scarlet Witch, which seems a heretical from a straight-laced status-quo-loving fanboy perspective, but not from an accepted-spandex-mores & tropes perspective. Though maybe they're the same perspective.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, you are right re: werewolves trumping Batman, except I only think that's true in films. Batman's got the upper edge (however slight it may be) in the funny books.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I do think it's kind of bad-ass for Sam Kieth to say, "Sure, I'll do a Batman story" and then write whatever he wants (three out of five issues are done and Batman hasn't even shown up yet). The art's fantastic, and the story (which is really nuclear-fallout-mutants vs. rednecks with a wandering werewolf kid tossed in) is still convincing me.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - Yeah, that's one of the things I really enjoyed about BP, and it mixes with the great surreal moments, like the narrator taking off five pair of pants, and Hulk going clubbing, and the fact that the narrator was basically Michael J. Fox. Along with the way however far the universe span out of control in these ways, it was never out of BP's control (unless it was).

Bah, now I've set my expectations too high. I think I'll wait until they're lower, and buy the first CA&F TPB.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm staying home this week. Nothing nerdy enough for me.

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Andrew, you're going to be disappointed in the TPB, I'm afraid. You should try to (at the very least) surreptitiously skim the new issue before you dive into that trade. Or (if you haven't already), read Paul O'Brien's review of the first issue, and multiply the Bart Sears caveats by a bazillion.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

That Elektra: The Hand mini seems like it might satisfy my ninja desires.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 30 August 2004 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, you namechecked Pogs.

Okay, for me this week ... well, nothing's a must-have except Y and Swamp Thing, and Ultimate Spidey will arrive by subscription. Swamp Thing has been good so far, but the first arc was purely a "wrapping up loose ends from previous books, clearing the deck and getting ready to go" arc -- a good one, mind you, although Constantine seemed a little off somehow (but I haven't read his book in years, so for all I know it's perfectly consistent) -- so it's hard to tell where the book's going from here and if it'll be great. My hopes are higher than they've been since the Nancy Collins run, though.

Things I may flip through: Gambit, Jubilee, depending on the creative teams. I liked Fabian Nicieza's Gambit, although my dream writer for the character would be Priest.

I haven't read Scratch, but anyone with a jones for Sam Keith should get the third Maxx tpb if they haven't got it -- it came out about a month ago, iirc.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 30 August 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I will check out the Gambit just to see how they handle New Orleans, I'm not expecting it to be any good though.

Does Swamp Thing switch teams with the new arc, or is Diggle staying on?

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 30 August 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Good question -- Newsarama says Josh Dysart takes over with #9 (so I assume Diggle has one more arc, unless there's a fill-in writer), and his comments on ST could be taken as either a good or bad sign, I think.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 30 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, Will Pfeiffer bridging the gap between Diggle & Dysart.

ALSO - if any of you phreaks are really curious about the newest issue of Uncanny, please allow me to indulge in a li'l ego-boostin' self-promotin' and post a link to my site, which features a little blah blah about the issue in question & a link to Mile High Comics' free online preview of the book.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

What I meant to say: "...Will Pfeiffer (writer of Aquaman / Hero / other low selling and/or near-cancellation DC titles; the Distinguished Competition's answer to Sean McKeever?) is briding the gap..."

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh dear, three writers in the first year? Even the whole "getting one writer just to clear the deck for the new writer" thing doesn't quite sit well with me.

Also, yay UXM blah blah/preview!

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 30 August 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I just read the first UXM trade, and, uh, not being very familiar with Marvel and stuff, do they just keep telling the same stories over and over again?

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Please define "first UXM trade".

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

And, in the future, please switch to reading the NXM trades, as the NXM trades better reflect what fans love about the X franchise. Thanks, The Mgmt.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Ultimate X-Men: The Tomorrow People?

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

OH! ULTIMATE X-MEN!

Yeah - given that the Ultimate Marvel universe is a modern retelling / reimagining of the "real" Marvel universe, then, yeah, repetition repetition repetition the rest are paste etc.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

All in alll, this is a servicable funny book, but almost anything’s going to pale in light of Grant Morisson’s previous run and Joss Whedon’s current work on Astonishing (which, interestingly, honors Claremont’s legacy more than anything Claremont’s put his name to as of late).

This encapsulates a lot of what I think about Astonishing -- I've been getting the urge to reread the relevant Essentials volumes lately, and that's clearly why. Barring a brief period in Alan Davis's run before the last Claremont comeback, it's the first X-team-book since the 80s that I've actively looked forward to every month, and one of the few Marvel titles I think about when not actually reading it, if you see what I mean.

(In that sense, it also hits the nostalgia chord so many of these toy/cartoon tie-in revivals -- Thundercats, Micronauts, et al -- aim for and mostly miss.)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

To be totally honest, I think I inadvertently ripped that line of thought (re: Whedon & Claremont) from Dirk Deppey's rundown of the X-titles from TCJ.com, which I actually can't seem to find on their site anymore - it was an ancillary column to partner with his column about Marvel's current state (linkage).

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Have we had a S&D: X-titles thread? I had meant to do one. Like not just X-Men, but solo titles, specific tpbs/graphic novels, past and present, and so on. I mean, the field is pretty damn wide.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha, me so stupid. Uncanny, of course.

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Even so, Huck, AVOID any Uncanny X-Men TPBs written by Chuck Austen. Avoid them like flaming bags of poo under ladders on Friday the 13th. If you can find the Dark Phoenix Saga, go gonzo. Otherwise, just snag any of the Essential Uncanny X volumes. Or, like I said, any New X-Men trades (but watch out for that Chuck Austen character).

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

You do realize that I'm cHUCK Austen?

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

No, no I'm not. That wasn't fun.

Huck, Monday, 30 August 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Huck, don't even kid.

BTW, Tep, the X thread has begun. You can have first dibs.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

More Austen asshattery
http://www.popcultureshock.com/reviews.php?id=3246

Huck, Tuesday, 31 August 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

'A sound beating'?

Vic Fluro, Tuesday, 31 August 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

DONG!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 31 August 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.