Mark Waid: C or D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
BECAUSE DAN ASKED FOR IT!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 13:58 (twenty years ago)

Stifled my joy in comics with his reverent competence. Dud.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:01 (twenty years ago)

C, generally.

Huck, Friday, 3 September 2004 14:02 (twenty years ago)

Dud. He probably would annoy me less if his friendship with Grant Morrison didn't lead him to situations where they are directly compared (JLA, Flash), which does him no favours.

Exhibit A has to be Kingdom Come.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago)

What's the story behind _The Reader_? That's based on Waid's first _Captain America_ run, right?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago)

Made me read and enjoy Fantastic Four. Not sure whether that's a good thing or nor.

Empire was brilliant though, so I say Classic.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:03 (twenty years ago)

No wait, he wrote Kingdom, didn't he? That has to be Exhibit A.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:04 (twenty years ago)

No it isn't at all, David, I don't think either of us have ever read that. It was based on a) Kyle Rayner; b) that emo Flash six-parter Waid was doing where Wally had to sacrifice something or other; c) dig at Starman thrown in for good measure.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago)

A common criticism is that he preferred to establish his villains as evil by having them kill someone, rather than actual characterisation.

The only Waid I have ever read: Kingdom Come, his fill-in issues of JLA.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:08 (twenty years ago)

OMG he actually did that when he revamped Dr. Doom - he killed his true love in order to gain True Power, therefore HE IS GOING FOR BROKE YOU ELASTIC BASTARD!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:11 (twenty years ago)

Classic. Every time Tom brings him up, I'm convinced that he's talking about someone else, because it sounds as off-base as complaining about the Beatles rapping.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:11 (twenty years ago)

This, specifically, I just can't get my head around:

I can hate on the Speed Formula because it led directly to the SPEED FORCE which was the worst, explaining what never needed explaining and sucking all the wonder out of the Flash in exchange for...what? A shit villain and a boring double sized fight issue.

-- Tom

(Sorry to single you out, Tom, you just bring him up a lot.)

Complaining about Waid doing the "here's the explanation for powers we've never explained and kind of don't make any sense, so here's something that isn't REALLY an explanation but at least makes more sense than mongoose blood and leads to plots instead of just being an expository band-aid" thing when that was such a huge facet of comics at the time is like bitching at Kane and Finger for giving Batman a cape.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:14 (twenty years ago)

I disapprove of logical origins I think.

I'm also not sure it was a huge facet of comics at the time. Or if it was I didn't like the other people doing it either.

But you're right, Waid has come to be a lazy shorthand of mine for a kind of 90s comics I disliked, an inevitable reaction to the Image 'thing' but an overreaction nonetheless. I should reread some of them - or read some more of his stuff - and get a better handle.

I don't think at all that he was a bad craftsman, his comics were always well-paced and readable - it's just they seemed so drab somehow.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:19 (twenty years ago)

I also liked most of his Flash & GL miniseries.

Huck, Friday, 3 September 2004 14:21 (twenty years ago)

That said:

C:
- his current run on _Fantastic Four_ (excepting a little hiccup w/ this Frightful Four nonsense) (& perhaps some of the Iraq / Latveria parallels); throwin' it back to the old-school (complete w/ the "science" & the Thing / Torch repartee), but not as an exercise in dustbunnying & also features the best plot-dead-end cop-out / homage possible (because if Jack Kirby IS God, then everything's OK)
- _Empire_ (story of an intergalactic dictator & his back-stabbing cronies; totally unlike his trad. reverential superhero stuff; someone w/ a better grip should possibly attempt to pimp this mini)
- the Professor Zoom / Barry Allen bit in _Flash_ (my fondness for TRIPLE-SIZED issues has a lot to do w/ it)

D:
- his mid-Morisson _JLA_ stories (which actually came off as exercises in biting Warren Ellis' "look what I read in the Science section!" MO that just wasn't executed all that well)

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:23 (twenty years ago)

And that's the thing -- Waid is one of the guys who got me back into superhero comics after avoiding them for I'm-not-sure-how-long. He's definitely not unmitigatedly classic -- he had his peak and I think it's behind him now -- but he shouldn't be the whipping boy for a whole trend just because he did it more memorably than most others. (The Flash at least had a gap to fill; didn't Byrne's Fourth World explanation of everything try to account for Superman, the Green Lanterns, etc., with a giant magical wall?)

(xposts)

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:24 (twenty years ago)

A GIANT MAGICAL WALL?????

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Wasn't that what the Source was? (I think it was called the Source.) There was this big crossover thing. The Speed Force like emanated from the Source or something, a fact which was promptly ignored after the crossover ended. The Source was this like magical sine wave coming from a big magical wall, and when it rippled, everyone's powers turned off.

I'm probably badly mangling what I learned from stories in Comic Shop News.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:27 (twenty years ago)

Things like Jack Kirby is God just seem awfully twee to me, I dunno.

I think I'm too much of an old-school 2000AD man to ever enjoy Waid. I like my comics glib and nasty. (this does not mean I like ponderous and nasty or glib and sadistic, of course).

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:27 (twenty years ago)

Yes John Byrne is another story entirely.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:28 (twenty years ago)

(which actually came off as exercises in biting Warren Ellis' "look what I read in the Science section!" MO that just wasn't executed all that well)

Did Waid invent "Flash Facts", which were the Flash version of this?

Waid's respect for history vs Byrne's lack of respect but only bad ideas for what to use instead: FITE. (post Next Men Byrne, I think)

xpost

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:29 (twenty years ago)

(My Byrne knowledge is 100% unsullied by exposure to his writing)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:31 (twenty years ago)

Oh his editing of Grant M's Doom Patrol is classic obv.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:34 (twenty years ago)

"Flash Facts" were staples of the Silver Age.

Huck, Friday, 3 September 2004 14:39 (twenty years ago)

xpost!

Yeah, it was twee, though it wasn't as twee (for me) as it could've been because it was coming on the heels of A) the Thing, possessed by Doom, getting ZAPPED! by one of Reed's guns & getting killed, B) Mr. Fantastic vowing to use his technology to rescue the Thing from Heaven, C) STORMING THE GATES OF HEAVEN! In essence, the entire journey was some overarcing metaphor for Reed's inability to embrace non-scientific modes of thought (also explored when Dr. Strange popped by a few issues prior to try & teach Mr. F, a prisoner of DOOM!, some magic tricks), and using the Kirby-ex-machina device (to revive the Thing, repair Reed's scarred face) is a bit too quaint, but for the simple fact that Waid was willing, in this climate, to write a story that's so ridiculously NOT in line with Marvel's current "keep it real" MO (especially following all the death & destruction & endless brooding of the previous arc), endeared the story to me.

Let's not talk about JB. Really. He punted Wonder Woman, he's totally punting the Doom Patrol (even though I think the retcon was an editorial edict & not actually his doing), he undoubtedly punted the JLA arc that re-introduced the new Doom Patrol, I imagine his undying respect for Kirby lead to him punting all his Fourth World stuff as well as this new Demon series he's got in the pipeline, and I know for damn sure he punted the Hulk the 2nd time around, and what I've heard about his work w/ Spider-Man reminds me of what happens when foot is applied to football. Essentially, post Next Men (though it's probably post-Superman), he's been deadset on donkey punching the super-hero industry, and it's only due to his diminishing stature in the current industry that he hasn't been able to do more to eff stuff up.

But I could be wrong.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:41 (twenty years ago)

The good news is I'm only uncertain about what one of the words in that post meant... Is it "fucked up" or "gave up on"?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:46 (twenty years ago)

You mean "punt"? It's my own shorthand for when someone has control of a situation, and, instead of doing a good job w/ the situation, screws up & has to give up control. I guess it's a combo of "fucked up" and "gave up on". Might not be the best way to describe what I was talking about, but I was on a roll.

Dan can explain "donkey punch", if need be.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 September 2004 14:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure we've asked this before, but does anyone read Byrne (like, current/recent stuff) and like it, or know anyone who does? Honestly -- I usually dally at the comic store talking to the guys who work there, so I overhear a reasonable range of people shopping/talking about stuff, etc., and I haven't heard a kind word spoken about Byrne since the first volume of Generations came out.

(Except on rac.* -- Dan might remember the guy who inexplicably, at least to me, defended everything Byrne ever touched.)

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 3 September 2004 15:01 (twenty years ago)

There's a guy on another comics msg bd who seems to really like him, though I think it might be Byrne under a Dr. Doom anagram.

Huck, Friday, 3 September 2004 15:03 (twenty years ago)

I don't think he's been able to think of or think through or tell a good story for about a decade, it's ghastly - his art has hardly changed so when you look at a new Byrne book it seems very familiar and then you realise there's nothing there at all.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 September 2004 15:06 (twenty years ago)

Byrne sucks so much harder than Waid, it's amazing.

Waid still sucks, though.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Friday, 3 September 2004 15:53 (twenty years ago)

Kingdom Come sucked.

Who was it that wrote those big prestige issues w/ Alex Ross? I want to pin those atrocities on Waid, but I'm coming up with Paul Dini.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:30 (twenty years ago)

Yup, it was Dini. I got the JLA one. What a waste. And it's so friggin' big I don't know what to do with it.

Huck, Friday, 3 September 2004 18:34 (twenty years ago)

Get it autographed and sell it on ebay.

speaking from experience (Leee), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:36 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
I still agree with myself on the Speed Force - it really didn't need explaining, and the stories it featured in were always a drag. It feels similar to the origin-surgery Straczinski's done on Spider-Man.

BUT I was too harsh on Waid - compared to some of the similar writers we have now he seems positively zippy, and his Legion is good. I haven't re-read Kingdom Come but I did actually read THE KINGDOM at the weekend, and it's not at all bad until everything goes completely out of the window for the final bookend and we suddenly get a different story entirely.

In fact The Kingdom is better than Infinite Crisis (though IC is more fun to larff about on messageboards).

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 March 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

In fact The Kingdom is better than Infinite Crisis

oh hey Tom come on now

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

THERE I SAID IT

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 March 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)

I say Waid is classic! He wasn't always classic, but ever since 2001 or so, he's been on fire with Fantastic Four and Legion. Definitely one of the best guys in the mainstream comics industry.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 6 March 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

Oh yeah FF was really good too, especially the last few storylines, the Ben in Heaven bits I could have done without.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)

I agree with Tom possibly -- The Kingdom is better-written than Infinite Crisis (and really isn't that similar to KC!), but IC is better spectacle. That's true for either IC, come to think of it.

That's not always complimentary -- The Pelican Brief is more competently written than Zardoz, but I'll probably never watch it again and will continue to watch Zardoz every time it's on cable.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, IC is better spectacle, definitely. The big problem with The Kingdom is the huge misdirection - for 1 bookend and 5 one-shots you're led to believe that the resolution will be all about a reconciliation between generations, past and future, etc. (which totally would fit with Gog's 'thing', too), and those are good comics which pretty much sidestep spectacle past bookend #1. Then the final issue basically is issue #7 of Infinite Crisis, or what I expect it will be, and the introduction of Hypertime is completely botched.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

Fuckin' ZARDOZ. Hell yeah.

Uh, sorry, what were we talking about?

Mr. Waid is an entertaining speaker and personality, but I have to say that I haven't really read anything by him that's made a huge positive impression on me. KINGDOM COME is interesting a sort of oldschool strikes back against the Image upstarts, but doesn't really move me past that. EARTH X (which is roughly the same thing done in the Marvel U, from close to the same time period) is much more engaging. John-Paul Leon vs Alex Ross FITE!

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

Matthew Maxwell read his LOSH revamp RIGHT NOW!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)

Also, IIRC, your TS is actually:

JOHN PAUL LEON (over Alex Ross breakdowns) vs. ALEX ROSS (over pictures of his family)

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

I looooove Waid's LOSH, but I've read maybe eight, nine issues total of all LOSH to come before it, so I never know if I'm liking Waid or if it's like calling someone a good cook because they gave you a chocolate and awesome sandwich. For all I know all he did was find the bread and the chocolate and awesome were already in the pantry.

But everyone else is giving him credit for it, so I don't mind doing the same. (Probably everything else I think about Waid, I already said upthread.)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

You are INCORRECT, sir!

Leon indeeded pencilled EARTH X. Ross did character designs and story contribution and covers and blessedly stayed the hell away from the pencilling.

Is there a LoSH trade that I might read? I know precisely nothing about the Legion, nor do I really care. Now, do you reiterate your recommendation?

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

At his panel at WonderCon, Waid seemed really embarrassed by the existence of THE KINGDOM.

I suspect, actually, that he has not yet fully hit his stride as a writer--unusual, considering how long he's been doing it. But I do like his more recent stuff much better than his older stuff.

Douglas (Douglas), Monday, 6 March 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

Not wanting to second-guess Mr W but I'm betting it's the embarassment of something you believed in but which never quite came off rather than the embarassment of being wrong.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 6 March 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

Matt, FWIW, I echoed yr sentiment prior to Waid's revamp (tho I have enjoyed, in the past, both L.E.G.I.O.N. - which really didn't have much to do w/ LOSH, AFAIK - & the DnA / Coipel Legion series - which, um, ditto), and was also skeptical re: the revamp. & now I am totally smitten w/ the book.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

I think Douglas is right about Waid just yet hitting his peak as a writer. It seems like he's been gradually learning a lot and shedding a lot of his insecurites as he goes along. I think he's just as clever and thoughtful as Grant Morrison, but generally doesn't allow himself to go wild. He's kinda uptight, and he gets better as he sheds that fear of seeming pretentious.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 6 March 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

Absolutely classic. I love Waid's Flash, never mind the speed force (which I like) and he also gave us Max Mercury, best speedster ever.

His Legion is great too, also worth checking out: L.E.G.I.O.N. (with added Giffen goodness at the beggining!).

But...I tend to like those writers you usually seem to despise (Robinson, Johns, anyone who grew up reading comics and wants everything connected by a sense of legacy. I'm a sucker for those kind of things).

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 6 March 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

The biggest difference between Waid and Robinson or recent Johns is the sheer portentousness in the writing of the latter two (Starman is good for what it is, I just hate what it is). Waid's "angst of the legacy" approach to Wally West is still essentially light, no darker than the Lee/Ditko Spider-Man, and he didn't feel the need to reinvent Gorilla Grodd or the Rogues as dangerous takeseriouslyable villains.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

He was an editor at first, no? I seem to recall his name on the letters pages of the early Five Years Later Legion, and then maybe he was also writing the odd goofy Secret Origins issue.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 6 March 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

I think he had some editorial connection (ed? assistant ed?) to Grant's Doom Patrol, which was probably the reason for their later not-quite-collaborations -- Waid doing JLAYO to Morrison's JLA, Morrison's Flash fill-in and assist on Hypertime.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

He was the editor of Doom Patrol for much of Grant's run. He was the editor of Legion too. He's got a lot of great work to answer for, basically.

I agree that the lightness of Waid's work is what makes his ideas work. Even Kingdom Come, which is about as portentious as he gets, has this spark to it that keeps it from Johns-dom.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

THere's something to be said (in favour) of a UNIVERSE-SHATTERING multipart saga that can be pretty much ignored afterward (see, because maybe the point of it was TO TELL A GOOD STORY rather than FIX SHIT).

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'd like to see a remix of Kingdom Come where the script is exactly the same and the artist is like Rags Morales or somebody.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

Rags working over Liefeld layouts! What happens when SADFACE meets GRIT-TEETH?

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

No no, not the sadface! I forgot he did IC, he came to mind because of Hourman. The idea is, same script minus Ross art = much much less portentous.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

James Kolcholka's Kingdom Comef*ckers

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

The idea is, same script minus Ross art = much much less portentous.

I personally think that the narrator being shown everything that's happening by THEE SPECTRE because what's coming is THEE END OV THEE WORLD is more important than the fact that the narrator looks like Alex Ross's dad. Not to mention the retarded 'everything is a generational conflict' motif, or the worst treatment of Wonder Woman (=Eve and serpent in one, basically) I've seen, or or argh.

I'm happy that people are liking Waid's recent work, but let's not go nuts on revisionism here: Kingdom Come is an appalling comic, and the fact that IC is both worse and more hyped shouldn't obscure that.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

FWIW, when I wrote THere's something to be said (in favour) of a UNIVERSE-SHATTERING multipart saga that can be pretty much ignored afterward (see, because maybe the point of it was TO TELL A GOOD STORY rather than FIX SHIT). I was totally thinking of THE KINGDOM (no come).

Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

I personally think that the narrator being shown everything that's happening by THEE SPECTRE because what's coming is THEE END OV THEE WORLD is more important than the fact that the narrator looks like Alex Ross's dad. Not to mention the retarded 'everything is a generational conflict' motif, or the worst treatment of Wonder Woman (=Eve and serpent in one, basically) I've seen, or or argh.

Yes yes, and you're welcome to think that, but that's plot, and I'm talking about tone.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 6 March 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

The one thing of his I really like - and nobodys mentioned it yet - was his run on Captain America with Ron Garney. The one that Liefield's abomination replaced and which then returned after Liefield disappeared. The current run reminds me of it, a little. Taut, action-oriented stories, a confident grasp of Cap as a character, and Garney discovering himself as an artist for the first time.
Waid's love of Cap was evident.

I agree with Tep. Kingdom Come's flaws all seem to come more from Alex Ross than from Waid. The pomposity is in the art. Even so I quite enjoyed it at the time.

Mostly he seems like a decent writer. JLA says it all, really. Not a terrible run, but he had to follow Morrison, and hes a great writer. Which puts Waid's stature into perspective.

David N (David N.), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

xpost - You don't think the constant drumbeat of apocalypse from the Spectre sets a tone?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 01:13 (nineteen years ago)

Let us not forget that Kingdom Come was originally a Ross idea, that later got Waid attached as a writer.

xpost: I agree completely with Tep. Waid's stories are light and fun, he truly loves the characters and doesn't have to revamp the rogues or stupid things like that. Anyway, I still love "Starman". =)

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 01:46 (nineteen years ago)

originally a Moore idea that Ross and Waid nicked for nefarious ends amirite etc

kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 04:54 (nineteen years ago)

xpost: totally right, kit.

what would have happened to constantine if twilight of the superheroes had been published?.

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 06:36 (nineteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0374299412.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)

WAID TALKS BATMAN: BED & BREAKFAST:
http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/features/114235458730345.htm

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

Where does Waid's new job (as E-in-C of Boom!) leave all of his (lately) wonderful DC stuff (though is B&B the only thing he's currently doing?)?

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 28 July 2007 04:26 (seventeen years ago)

FLASH! I guess the rumors of his Flash run being abbreviated were kinda true (tho the interview @ CBR suggested he'll be sticking around DC books a bit longer).

David R., Saturday, 28 July 2007 04:33 (seventeen years ago)

Oh yeah, the Flash. I guess I had just gotten used to not giving one crap about le speestere squarlette. Still, I find myself surprisingly dismayed about a near-future with less Waid stories.

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 28 July 2007 05:00 (seventeen years ago)

Waid generally i know shit about - kit told me he sucked re the jla fillins when morrison had the run (and getting the trades i agree, but hey who could make it work with that art? certainly not morrison for mine - waids were just worse again) but then i got a waid writ supes trade from the library (ah fuck i can't remember - it was to do with africa?) and it was good.
so i invested ina coupla things thru ebay to see and ah um oh dear. i have a feeloing he writes way too much in hack form. but i have kingdom come in battered second hand condition unread on my shelf so maybe i'll read it tomorrow and let you know my take.

mully, Saturday, 28 July 2007 12:00 (seventeen years ago)

kingdom come: beatjacked an unpubbed enormo-Moore story.

energy flash gordon, Saturday, 28 July 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago)

five months pass...

Mark Waid stands up to, or steps away from, current spandex hegemony.

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 5 January 2008 05:22 (seventeen years ago)

(but stays on Brave & Bold, so who cares!)

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 5 January 2008 05:22 (seventeen years ago)

I kinda get the sense that Waid is taking certain positions out of defensiveness and necessity.

Mr. Perpetua, Saturday, 5 January 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)

I've been reading this urban-gritty-noirish title by him called "Potters Field". By the final issue I have decided that it is only average.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Saturday, 5 January 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

I tried reading Waid's LoSH and thought it was about as enjoyable as a bag of sick.

HI DERE, Monday, 10 March 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

You are broken in irreparable Alex-in-NYCian ways, Dan.

David R., Monday, 10 March 2008 22:02 (seventeen years ago)

HUGGLEZ ^_^

David R., Monday, 10 March 2008 22:30 (seventeen years ago)

It started off pretty great! Shame it lost the plot after the first year or so.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)

Haha I think I started reading well after that first year; I only got three issues before saying "oh fuck this".

HI DERE, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)

The first eight-or-so issues are terrific and fun, all done-in-one stories, then Waid gets bogged down in too much plot and the overarching storyline gets "darker" in a way that's not particularly satisfying and/or necessary. I got the impression Waid had to rush the plot to tie everything up before "One Year Later" and the pointless Supergirl stuff started.

The floppies (which are probably pretty cheap) are well worth picking up as they have extra stories and old-school-lettercols in them, which aren't in the trades.

In other news, I'm sad Waid's finishing B&B, it's probably my favourite title right now 'cept for Criminal.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)

nooooooooooooooooo

Is it being shitcanned once he bails, or are they going to Bedard proceedings?

David R., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

Has it been confirmed anywhere that Waid is leaving, or is that just more Lying In the Gutters trash-talk?

Douglas, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.