To get a flavour of this look at a Conan The Barbarian cover gallery at some point.
Or at Commando Picture Library for that matter.
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)
I guess the 'question' is - do you as a reader like this? (not you especially Huck, anybody)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)
And that's fine, because it's a great frame to tell stories about lots of different kinds of people, and any massive changes in the setup would fuck that up (although it's bound to happen at some point).
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic Fluro, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 9 September 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic Fluro, Thursday, 9 September 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 9 September 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)
My suspicion is that trades full of single issue stories don't/won't sell as well as trades with a single plot, for the same reason (whatever it is!) that short story anthologies don't sell as well as novels.
They'd sell to me. But otherwise, you're OTM.
― Huk-L, Thursday, 9 September 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)
I won't, though.
― Vic Fluro, Thursday, 9 September 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)