The Distinguished Competition

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
(I'm starting to get a little embarrassed by all the mainstream threads but on the other hand, SO WHAT)

When you got into comics did you take the Marvel/DC rivalry seriously? Did you only buy one company's stuff? Did you have a preference? And why? And do you still have it...?

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)

It was a few years before I really noticed publishers, and when I did it was because of price differences (otherwise I think it would have been another few years): DC moved their comics up to 75 cents when Marvel ones (except for a few things) were still 60. That really was a much sharper difference to me than the content -- it could mean buying an extra comic if I only bought Marvel! (Which is usually what happened, until I got into Swamp Thing. Even though I'd always been a Batman fan, I was never a fan of the ongoing Batman series.)

I understood that there were separate continuities (or whatever word I would have used) -- Everyone in Superfriends was in one world, Spider-Man and His Amazing Friends was another -- but crossovers still weren't common, as such, so it didn't seem to make much difference.

Even when I got into all the meta stuff like talking about the differences between pre- and post-Crisis DC, stuff like that, I don't remember taking much note of the rivalry -- I mean, I wasn't oblivious to it, but it didn't seem very pressing. Although if asked, I would've told you DC comics were more like cartoons than Marvel ones. I'm not sure what I meant by it, I just remember saying it.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I was Marvel all the way as a kid. I presumed without any kind of evidence (save Stan Lee's hyperbole) that comics published by other people were all crap. I'm sure it was mainly because I was only familiar with the Marvel Universe.

Then, of course, I discovered 2000 AD and through it Alan Moore et al.

Wooden (Wooden), Sunday, 12 September 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I've always considered myself more of a Marvel person because I wasn't into the whole JLA DC crowd as a kid (in fact, my enjoyment of the JLA is wholly contingent on Grant Morrison's involvement). However, DC had Batman and later Vertigo, so I couldn't take sides against them.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 12 September 2004 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I got into comics during the heyday of Crisis on Infinite Earths and the awesome Who's Who project. Back issues going as far back as the early 70s (I was a fiend for the Aparo-drawn Brave & Bold Batman team-ups) were readily available for dirt cheap at a used bookstore near my house, so I voraciously absorbed all the great Earth-1/Earth-2 stuff as it was being dismantled. I pretty much ignored Marvel, even though I had been a Spider-Man and Incredible Hulk fan in my pre-school days thanks to TV.
I still buy probably 98% DC, because it's the universe I know and care about. I've been reading more and more Marvel (and others) though, thanks to the wonderful public library system here.

Huk-L, Monday, 13 September 2004 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I really liked The X-Men and the Teen Titans as a kid. When I started buying comcis again during college, I went for the X-Men because there wasn't a Teen Titans book on the market and I had zero interest in reading about Nightwing solo.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I prefer the Marvel Universe to the DC Universe, but I probably buy more DC comics (though non DCU) than Marvel ones. This is life.

For all that the DC Universe has Superman and Batman, it is essentially lame and lacking in the majesty of Lee and Kirby's creation, yeah?

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I have always seen the DCU as sort of an 8-yr-old's fantasy, whereas the Marvel Universe is more of 12-yr-old's fantasy.
For me, the appeal of superheroes was a wish-fulfillment sort of thing, and being able to relate to the problems wasn't such a priority, as, y'know, I had to relate to problems of my own every damn day.
The idea of dual identities, that you could be a nebbish Clark Kent, as I felt like was as an adolescent, and still achieve great things and BE somebody. That you didn't have to be the person other people thought you were held great appeal to me. Though I suppose that could have been a Peter Parker thing just as easily.
I dunno, DC heroes also had way cooler costumes than Marvel. Also, not being an American, Captain America seemed like an oppressive tool of capitalist lapdogs.

Huk-L, Monday, 13 September 2004 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, not being an American, Captain America seemed like an oppressive tool of capitalist lapdogs.

This is why WE DON'T READ CAPTAIN AMERICA.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 September 2004 13:52 (twenty-one years ago)

But isn't he the Superman of the Marvel Universe? The paragon to which all lesser heroes aspire?

Huk-L, Monday, 13 September 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, maybe DC wins after all.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 September 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I work next to Buckingham Palace, I am going to go check out the bat-action exclusively for ILC.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 13 September 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost Cap is the Superman of the Marvel Universe in precisely the same way that Spartan is the Superman of the Wildstorm Universe, ie no one gives a shit about the asshat in the red, white and blue tights.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 September 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

(The above reading of Cap should be run through the Dan Perry Doesn't Give A Shit About Captain America filter before being compared to reality.)

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 September 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

It's all happening round the other side sadly. No bat fun for me.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 13 September 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Captain America is the Superman of the MU in that his value system can be viewed as being anachronistic and slightly out-of-sync with his peers and society at large. However, where Supes has acclamated to his settings to some degree (cf. his post-death mullet), CA is often still portrayed as a temporally misplaced fish out of water (cf. his fondness for _Yankee Doodle Dandy_ & big band music & other corny bits referencing his being reared in the early 20th century).

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 13 September 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

isn't CA an embodiment of all the good things that America aspires to be, with all the bad stuff airbrushed out? In his way, this makes him a more inspirational hero.

wasn't there some great storyline in the 1980s where he turned against the government because they had betrayed America?

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 13 September 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Comics in taking 10 years to catch up with real world shocker! (see also: Superman's mid-90s mullet)

Huk-L, Monday, 13 September 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

DC-wise, loved the Legion growing up, and read all the Batman, Metamorpho, Eclipso, etc. I could find. Especially fond memories of that Joker series. But eventually, seemed like Marvel dealt with real-life issues, and wrote stories with repercussions, whereas DC seemed static, overburdened with imaginary tales, and too many colors of kryptonite for Superman. "Wintergreen kryptonite - gives his super-cold breath a lovely odor", etc. Still own the Crisis series, and a handful of the Teen Titans (around the Hive / Deathstrike / Tara timeframe), but mainly, it's Marvel in my longboxes.

DV, you might be referring to the CA / "The Captain" split, where Cap took on the black costume that US Agent later wore. I'm not a Cap fan, but that'd be my guess.

Cap, to me, is the moral center of the Marvel Universe, in that (afaik) he never does the wrong thing, and embodies the best aspects of the American ideal. There's a lot to admire in him, but then he can be written as moralistic, preachy, and inflexible, too. Ditto with Daredevil.

Seems like I remember a good storyline around the Watergate-era where shadowy government figures framed Cap for murder - back then, at least, it was unexpected that such an iconic figure could fall so far, and paralleled Nixon's tainting of his office.

Chris Hill (Chris Hill), Monday, 13 September 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

He's also the Superman of the DCU in the sense that neither of them is ever written well, as a rule.

The Cap-turning-against-the-gov't storyline was actually the 70s, I think, unless it was the very early 80s -- it was Englehart's "Nomad" two-parter. (There've been other things where Cap's opposed the government on one thing or another, just not wholesale.) Gruenwald's "the gov't fires Cap, replaces him with John Walker" storyline was the 80s.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 13 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

("Frequently written badly" might be more fair -- especially since I just gave two examples of good Cap arcs, both by pretty good Cap writers -- and I think I mean mostly in their solo books. They aren't very good protagonists; I have a feeling I've said this before, but I don't think it's coincidence that Superman has the most stable supporting cast of the DC superheroes, one that is as solidly part of his mythos as Watson is part of Holmes's; or that the most memorable runs on Captain America have been marked by the quality of the supporting characters -- moreso than, say, on Spider-Man.)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 13 September 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Cap is the equivalent of Superman in that the Gruenwald Cap run was one of the few Marvel comics to successfully do what were basically silver age DC stories (i.e. totally stupid set-ups/things happening to protagonist) but play them in a straight 80s Marvel style. This is why stories such as Capwolf! and Cap becoming a woman and maybe even Cap on drukqs only get their due on forward-looking boards like ILC.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 13 September 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

This is why "Tom" is an anagram of "OTM."

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 13 September 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought Charlton comics as well as DC and Marvel, not to mention as many other comics as I could get my hands on, so no, I never cared much for the whole DC/Marvel rivalry.

I prefer the Marvel universe, I guess, probably because I got to follow it from the start through British reprints back in the seventies and because, well, Stan'n'Jack'n'Steve, y'know, geniuses all.

David Simpson (David Simpson), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Make Mine Marvel!!

I would always buy Marvel stuff, it just seemed superior. Like a Division 1 football team.

I only ever had a brief Batman flirtation when it came to DC.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/?column=17

Huk-L, Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

That's fantastic reading! The Superman story would be so great.

The thing is, Marvel did try a change as drastic: the spider clone saga. And then they backed out of it, and into it, and did the hokey-cokey until they'd fucked any semblance of rationality out of it (best bit = when they're just about to clean up everything, and then Bob Harras is made Editor-in-chief.)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)


for mine the DC Universe works better as a collective entity, because of the grounding by Weisinger and Schwartz making it a glorious patchwork where anyone can throw in any ludicrous shit and it just adds to the fun. whereas Marvel, thanks to the groundwork by uberfanboy Roy Thomas, is desperately obsessed with taking everything seriously and making it ALL FIT TOGETHER AND MAKE SENSE, and preferably refer to several Kirby bit-part characters along the way (or to Claremont in recent decades I guess).

note that the DC Universe in my head doesn't really bother with Crisis or know anything about what's happened since, as this Marvel-style attitude has infected the DCU (forcing hard reboots every nine months when they realise they OMG forgot to account for Ace The Bat-Hound in post-Zero-Hour continuity TEAR IT UP AND START AGAIN). the only ongoing books I've read in the '90s were Chase, Hitman and the Morrison JLA.

kit brash (kit brash), Wednesday, 20 October 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.