is this true? it is likely? one of the weird disorientating pleasures for small mark s reading rupert was the subtle disparities between book-type text vs depicted action... but of course rupert also told its story in VERSE COUPLETS. Whereas eg in "Tiger Tim and the Bruin Boys", the picture had lots of wordy asides - esp.from that cocky little parrot, who often broke the fourth wall - but the story could possibly mainly only be understood in its fullest from the main text. ie the pix told wehat happened, the main text said why, and the speech bubbles told you what the characters thought...
http://www.brandler-galleries.com/Images/Illustrations/RupertPg8.jpg
http://www.lambiek.net/artists/foxwell_herbert/foxwell_troublebruin1922.gif
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 21 October 2004 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)
(i assume d.c.thomson were actually looking primarily towards a slightly less confidently literate readershop, who were put off by that solid block of text - there's a scene in kes i think where the boy halting spells out some dialogue from (i think) the dandy... i remember being gobsmacked by it when i saw it aged maybe nine, bcz by that age reading comics wasn't difficult, and here was someone than me for whom it was: i had last had friends who couldn't read when i at rural village primary school, some three years before)
(by contrast, when the single panel cartoon moveds towards minimal captions in the early 1920s - awat from old-style punch playlets - the modernism wz effected by the tres chic and upscale jazz-age magazine the new yorker)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)
ALSO: i remember being gobsmacked that he was reading dandy not beano!! i am not now sure why this was BUT dandy in fact actually still had strips (in 1969) which used the panel-text system, biz BLACK BOB THE DANDY DOG and WINKER WATSON!! so maybe i considered it the "harder read" even then??!?
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 21 October 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)