Starting point in the X-Men universe?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I only know a few story lines that were in the old cartoon series, I'd like to jump into this, but I'd like to read only the better complete story lines. I don't want to jump into the middle of something.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0785108114/qid=1100708176/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i3_xgl14/102-9811660-3341732?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

Or better yet, the hardcover that contains the first two New X-Men trades.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd go more or less like this:

1) Astonishing X-Men (the current ongoing series). The rest of the recs are in chronological order:

2) Essential X-Men 1-3 (1 and 2 are Claremont/Byrne and introduce the "All-New All Different" X-Men that set the tone for everything to come -- Wolverine, Nightcrawler, Colossus, etc -- and cover the bulk of the Phoenix saga; 3 is Cockrum instead of Byrne, and isn't as good, but includes "the return of Dark Phoenix" and Dracula.) I know I'm skipping over the Essential Uncanny X-Men, the original comics by Stan Lee, but it isn't because they aren't good -- they just don't have as direct an impact on the post-Claremont X-saga. By all means read them if you become an X-fan, but they won't catch you up on much you don't already know from the cartoon and movies.

3) Days of Future Past, if it's not included in the Essential collections (I don't remember) -- this introduced the "horrible genocidal future in which mutants are interred in camps and/or hunted down by hunter-killer robots" meme which has periodically dominated the X-titles, and the original storyline dealing with that future is still probably the best.

4) The Mutant Massacre, which was the first big crossover storyline among the X-titles but also the best (and maybe the only good one).

5) Ask Dan for post-Mutant Massacre recommendations

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Possible starting points (in order of ease of entry):

A) The Dark Phoenix Saga TPB (Uncanny X-Men #129-137; starts in medias res, in a way, but hits the ground running with the good stuff, and I think there's enough of a preamble in the story to let you get your feet sufficiently wet before diving in) (there's also a trade paperback that collects the issues directly following this arc - #138-#143 - which features the wowie-zowie "Days of Future Past" 2-parter) (both Days of Future Past & Dark Phoenix have been rejiggered for the cartoon, yes?)

B) Astonishing X-Men: Gifted TPB (1st 6 issues of this recently launched series; Joss Whedon & John Cassaday give their respects to the Dark-Phoenix era X-group - their camraderie, their chemistry, their conflicts - while pushing things forward from where Grant Morrison jumped ship; plenty of stuff to enjoy for fanboys, as well as folks whose curiosities were piqued by the TV show & especially the movies) (this isn't out yet, but will be in a few months) (January 2005, according to Amazon)

C) New X-Men - Volume 1: E is for Extinction & Volume 2: Imperial (Grant Morrison's reimagineering of the X-Men, showing a healthy DISrespect for precendents; features Sentinels, interplanetary shenanigans, psychic warfare, and all sorts of other cool bits that tap into the strengths of the X-franchise while simultaneously blowing the doors off the joint; slightly more "mature", in terms of character interaction & plot goings-on & respecting the reader's brainpan, than what's happened before, which might be your speed if you're turned off by the awkward seriousness of super-hero books) (also intermittently features the gorgeous art of Frank Quitely) (note: there are SEVEN New X-Men volumes collecting Grant Morrison's run; if you like these two, you should get the other 5 AND READ THEM IN ORDER)

D) Essential X-Men: Volumes #1 and #2 (B/W mondo-sized cheaply-priced collections of the beginning of the X-Men team everyone knows & loves - starts w/ Giant Sized X-Men #1, goes into X-Men #94, and zooms off from there; kind of dicey going at first, but enjoyable in a quaint way, and then John Byrne hops on board w/ issue #108 to take the X-folk up into the lofty climes where they currently reside; Volume #1 covers Giant-Sized X-Men #1, and X-Men #94-119; Volume #2 goes from #120-144, including the Dark Phoenix / Days of Future Past stuff I mentioned at the start)

Or what everyone else said while I was typing this. FWIW, I think you can get what you need from the X-Men through my little walk-through and be content knowing you're not missing much otherwise.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Also I have a soft spot for the X-tinction Agenda trade (Claremont X-Men get captured in Genosha by anti-mutant fascist Cameron Hodge and his giant robotic spider body).

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with Daver, Dark Phoenix Saga is a good place to start.

The other night I found the collected issues of the Magneto War from 1999, I don't think I ever read those issues.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Or you could track down a reprint of Giant Size X-Men number 1, as it contains the first appearence of the new team (storm etc), and the Masterworks Volume 1, containing the first few issues from 1963 - for the retro fun.

Is thers a TPB of "Inferno?" I have a sadistic urge to read it, as I don't have the complete run of issues.

As a general rule avoid the mid to late 1990's, and Mr Sinister & Stryfe.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Avoid anything after they decided to ruin everything by starting over.

Fuck that gay shit.

Does John Coltrane Dream of a Merry-go-round? (ex machina), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Essential Uncanny X-Men.

Vic Fluro, Wednesday, 17 November 2004 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Did PAD's X-factor get collected anywhere? That was rather good, I (may wrongly) remember.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Vic, you know that the Essential Uncanny collects the Lee / Kirby stuff, right? Not to say that any X-fan wouldn't enjoy seeing the gang hanging out with Street Poet Ray's older brother, Bongo Bangin' Beauregard.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh he knows.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 18 November 2004 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Cheeky!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 18 November 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't you dis Bernard The Poet and his bongos. There's a character who needs an ongoing Marvel Knights title.

Vic Fluro, Thursday, 18 November 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

COMING SOON FROM MARVEL KNIGHTS:

SLAM #1 (of 42)
Brian Michael Bendis / Mark Millar (W)
(from a plot by Saul Williams & El-P)
Roger Cruz (Layouts)
Michael Lark (Finishes)

Down on the street, in the HEARTS and MINDS of teenagers, where BULLETS and BOMBS do no harm, a WAR is waged ... a war of WORDS!

BEAT versus RAP! BERNARD versus STREET POET RAY! ALLEN GINSBERG versus EMINEM! Turn on! Lean back! Step up! Lose yourself! MOSH!You'll see the best minds of your generation ... SPITTING HOT FIRE!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 18 November 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
I've decided to just read everything.

Read all the Astonishing X-men, and the first trade by Morrison, enjoyed them both so far.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)

It's actually probably a much better idea for people to read Astonishing X-Men as being the next season of X-Men after year three of New X-Men. It picks up right where that left off with the same cast of characters.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
has the mutant massacre ever been collected as a trade or a marvel essential?

foxy boxer (stevie), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

oh sorry, i just found it.

foxy boxer (stevie), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

Where did you find it? It's available as a trade, but it's also reprinted in its entirety in Essential X-Men vol. 6.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

Woah, including the ancilliary titles like Thor and Power Pack???

Dan (And So On) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

Yes indeed!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

they have this in my public library, and since i've read pretty much every other comic they have, i gave it a try, but man... it's well nigh unreadable!

dave k, Wednesday, 7 December 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

Hmm. Just found this thread and I'll bet that if you like what goes on in ASTONISHING and Morrison's NEW X-MEN, that if you start winding the clock back, you're going to be sorely disappointed. Sorely.

That said, if you want recommendations, read the Cockrum/Byrne/Smith/JRJR illustrated, Claremont written UNCANNY X-MEN. Stop at #200. Just stop there. It's the only way to be sure. Okay, maybe stick it through the Lee/Silvestri era, but stop after that. If you don't, you've only got yourself to blame.

You can read X-FACTOR, but stop after the Simonson team stops. And for the love of all that's holy, don't read any X-MEN (aka NEW X-MEN) until Morrison steps on. Just don't.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

You're crazy, Matt. If NXM/AXM fans are going to enjoy anything from the original Claremont run on the same terms as those books, it's most likely going to be the period of X-Men that goes from about 193 up through Fall of the Mutants! That's some really wonderful stuff, and generally more exciting/boundary-pushing/eventful than anything Whedon has done on the series to date.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha Matt M, I am so with you on PAD-Factor! (Not so much on UXM where I agree with Matt C about the importance up through Fall of the Mutants; when they get to Australia the entire series can kind of go fuck a hat.)

Dan (Massively-Overrated-Factor) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Also, there's some really good issues by Scott Lobdell randomly thrown about throughout his run, and the handful of issues that Joe Kelly did before editorial started dictating the plots were excellent, at least as good as Astonishing X-Men, if not better.

Peter Milligan has written some really great issues in his current run too. His X-Force/X-Statix is superlative as well, and probably a better starting point for some people than many comics that actually bear the title X-Men.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

the handful of issues that Joe Kelly did before editorial started dictating the plots were excellent, at least as good as Astonishing X-Men, if not better.

SO SO SO SO TRUE

Dan (Maggott!) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

I thought the whole Fall of the Mutants thing was utterly blah compared to what came before it. Besides, if you're a new reader and you enjoy AXM/NXM, going back to the time that Claremont ruled the Earth is going to be a pretty severe shock to your system. Maybe if you skip all of the thought balloons, it'll be better. Yes, Morrison's NXM is a direct reply to a lot of what Claremont did, but that doesn't mean if you like one, you'll like the other. I'll go out on a limb here and say that Morrison was actually writing NXM for folks who read UXM the first time around and got sick of it but couldn't figure out exactly why. Morrison took those reasons and built his run around them, as well as adding a bunch of new stuff that Claremont wouldn't have even dared dream of.

But hey, everyone's likely to have a different opinion on this stuff.

In truth, though, there's no good "starting point" for this stuff anymore. Which is one of the big problems with continuing the audiences for these books.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)

Well, yeah, you definitely have to acclimate yourself to the difference in style and tone, but that's more or less true of comics from every era. The stories and ideas are still really great, and that's what I'm judging them on. Astonishing X-Men reads very nicely, but it's almost entirely devoid of ideas and meaningful events. It's so obvious that aside from bringing back Colossus, Whedon is operating under instructions to not do anything of lasting importance to the series.

But that could be intentional too, since it's pretty obvious now that most any changes made to the characters since the end of the original Claremont run can be wiped from the canon within a few months of your departure, or killed off at the whim of some third-string writer. (Poor Maggott!)

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

In truth, though, there's no good "starting point" for this stuff anymore. Which is one of the big problems with continuing the audiences for these books.

Not really, it just means there's a lot of different places to jump on, with variations on the characters and themes to suit different tastes.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

Let me rephrase that slightly:

Astonishing X-Men reads very nicely, but it's almost entirely devoid of new ideas and meaningful events.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

Both those points are utterly true. Though I'm going to stick by my assertion that liking Morrison's NXM doesn't necessarily set you up for being a fan of Claremont's work.

The whole mutability of the canon thing is another thing that's both totally wonderful and utterly tragic, with regards to superhero comics in general. Thing is, these books live and die on the characters (or in the case of X-Men, a handful of core characters) and not the creators. I'm of the opposite case now, where I'm much more likely to stop reading a book once creators I dislike or am indifferent to step on (unless they wow me out of the gate.)

One of the other big problems, is you can't sell new comics on the basis of one strong single issue. You have to get folks a trade to get a feeling of anything resembling a complete story.

Oh, drat. I've derailed the thread. I'll stop now.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Though I'm going to stick by my assertion that liking Morrison's NXM doesn't necessarily set you up for being a fan of Claremont's work.

Oh, I agree with this, inasmuch as a lot of people loved it for the Morrison-ness of it rather it being a really amazing X-Men run.

I'm at the other end of you, Matt - I'm more fascinated by the longterm life of the X-Men canon/franchise than anything else. NXM is by far my favorite, but it's not the only X-Men that I really like a lot. Sometimes I buy X-Men comics on a whim just to get a fix. That's how I got into Brian K Vaughan's Ultimate X-Men run, and it's how I randomly purchased the most recent issue of Uncanny X-Men with Rachel Grey on the cover. (It's a solid, entertaining issue, one of the best Claremont comics I've read in ages.) Keep in mind that I've been following this stuff since I was six years old.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

You *are* the anti-me. Yet you share my name. MY BROTHER MY NEMESIS, indeed.

I've been following X-MEN of various stripes since I was 12, starting in 1980 or so, so my view may somehow be jaundiced by the passing of time.

Yet we can agree on the awesomeness of Morrison's X-run. Yes, let's do that.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

Well, I'm sure the difference between getting into the X-Men at twelve in 1980 and at six in 1985 probably could explain a lot of the differences.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

i'm really tempted to pick up some of those essentials (the early byrne stuff)... and perhaps i will... BUT I STILL WISH THEY WERE IN COLOUR.

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

this was a useful thread

Special Agent Dale Koopa (orion), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

His X-Force/X-Statix is superlative as well, and probably a better starting point for some people than many comics that actually bear the title X-Men.

I'm not so sure about this. He has a completely different cast, and it's set in the Mutants = Superstars started by Morrison (and ended.. last month?) which isn't really representative of "The X-Men". As it turns out :(

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

Well, in terms of being an interesting usage of the concept of "mutants," it's wonderful, more subtle, and more relevant to some people than the typical "feared and hated by a world blah blah blah" angle.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

Cry for me, the first few X-Men comics I read were probably the first few issues of the Claremont/Lee X-Men series followed by the X-ecutioners Song crossover shindig crapfest.

Of course, a couple years later my neighbor who had rental property had some renter leave several boxes of comics behind when skipping town. I think they had pretty much every UXM comic from the Dark Phoenix saga through issue #250 or so. And pretty much all of New Mutants and a bunch of other things from that period.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 8 December 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.