Watchmen: Classic Or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
You could have another good thread 'watchmen's influence: classic or dud?'

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

>:0

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

influence: maybe not so good. That whole "imagine if there really were costumed superheroes" thing is great when done first by Alan Moore, but thereafter rapidly diminishing returns.

Watchmen itself: total genius. This is the way to tell stories and portray characters.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the realism aspect isn't even the largest portion of Watchmen's influence (although if it were, I'd still put it in the Classic box). The bigger ones for me are:

1) The marketability of new superhero settings that, while making no attempt to distance themselves from the DC and Marvel standards, are not tied to them (nor necessarily published by them). Everyone and their colorist tried this before Watchmen, with no real big successes; everyone and their colorist continues to do so, but books like Supreme, Powers, Top Ten, Astro City, etc., did just as well as their cousins in the Big Two.

2) The breakdown of the hero/villain dichotomy. After the influence of the pulps faded, nearly every superhero comic gave its protagonist the benefit of the doubt: people were superheroes because they were Good and Right and Just, and the only time they made the wrong decision, it was because their judgment was clouded by drugs or a lack of information ("when titans clash"). Given an accurate account of a situation, every superhero would always pick the correct thing to do, simply by virtue of putting aside the greed or megalomania that defined supervillains. Spider-Man might be an exception in some ways, but for the most part his angst came from doubt, not from actually making the wrong choices.

Watchmen unquestionably changed that, and it's a simple enough change that a dozen mainstream comics come out every month demonstrating it, without ever reminding you of Watchmen while you read it (and most of the writers probably don't have Watchmen in mind while they're writing it, any more than the artists have the Yellow Kid in mind when they're drawing it; the influence may be profound, but it isn't noisy).

In general I credit or blame influence according to the stories it results in vs the stories it prevents. The problem with Miller's Dark Knight Returns, for instance, is that it cast such a shadow over the Batman comics for such a long time that the principal effect of its influence was to prevent the publication of non-Elseworlds Batman stories that weren't consistent with it; Watchmen hasn't really prevented anything. It's added but it hasn't subtracted. If it adds bad along with good, it still isn't taking away any comics we could read if it didn't exist. It's like a guest who went shopping, and while he might have bought some crappy Pop-Tarts in addition to the orange juice you asked for, he didn't eat any of your food, so you still come out on top.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

(Namor is an exception to #2 that I thought of as soon as I pressed submit.)

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I like your analysis a lot but isn't #2 another aspect of the 'realism' thing?

Also - is Watchmen an attempt to prevent 'superhero comics'? ;)

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a moral realism, I guess, but it's not the same as the ... what, cultural realism? ... of "what if there were superheroes." You can still have Superman making mistakes, or just plain being a dick, while still being a near-omnipotent alien born outside the lineage of Adam and the loop of original sin without apparently affecting Catholicism at all -- or Iron Man being an alcoholic (hmm, exception #2?) without Stark technology putting personal computers in homes twenty years ahead of schedule.

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 28 November 2004 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I still stand by my comment on the best-of thread.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 29 November 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Mindbogglingy classic. I can't actually think of a flaw in it, except the colouring's a bit sloppy.

Wooden (Wooden), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

the colouring was designed for newsprint, so it's always looked shit on clean white paper.

kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 09:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Tep's point 2 is interesting, and reminds me of why I hate "The Authority" - there is no sense of these fuckers as being in any way flawed, and they have no self doubt whatsoever and thus are quite happy to boss the world around whatever way they like.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)

That's Millar authority rather than Ellis Authority, isn't it? You can't go far wrong by just hating everything Millar writes.

Ray (Ray), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

! You'd miss the second best run on Swamp Thing ever.

It's both Authorities, in fairness - the concept is "high concept" ie comics versions of Independence Day etc.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

No, I think Ray is right. but so is Andrew - all of The Authority is based on the idea that for some mysterious reason absolute power will not corrupt the Authority.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

isn't the idea that it already has? (nb I have not read it and am going from Ellis' pronouncements on "it am just like Judge Dredd the protagonists is the bad guys really, o you foolish Americans")

kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, it's called The Authority, so there seems to be some level of fascist-awareness going on somewhere.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 30 November 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Nerrr, there is a po-faced seriousness to the way they stomp on bad governments and deal with things. You never actually see them smoking people because they disagree with them or whatever.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

In the three Ellis stories (really just the first two), the defining feature of the authority seems to be that they operate on a large scale and they're kind of blase about civilian casualties. They don't operate under any government or UN mandate, but they don't pay much attention to politics either. Its when Millar takes over that they start overthrowing dictators, installing new dictators, etc.

Ray (Ray), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
Which Watchman Are You?
http://www.angelfire.com/comics/mooreportal/wpi.html

Huk-L, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

SCORE!

YOU ARE RORSCHACH

Detached and possibly violent, your resolute adherence to your own sense of morality and your tendency toward multiple personalities is just plain frightening or, at least, weird to others. Law enforcement is entirely out of the question--you can't take orders, and you can't follow anybody else's rules but your own.

Quite simply, you are what you make of yourself. Occupational advice here is pointless. Have fun!

Huk-L, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

Me too.

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

I think the tipping point was that I said I was short.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

i am silk spectre or i am the comedian - how did i get two?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

You contain multitudes.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

OMG HUK ATE NED'S BRANE

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

YOU ARE DR. MANHATTAN

Detached, perhaps, "intellectual," and weirdly interested in the tiniest details, you should consider working with things, not people. Law enforcement could only use you as a parking meter. If you're academically inclined, seriously consider selling your college research papers online; you'll make a fortune. If you're not an "academic," open a TV/VCR repair service or be a webmaster.

If you're a philosophical sort, you'd make a great zen master.

Leeeee (Leee), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

YOU ARE NITE OWL I

You're a real "do-gooder," aren't you?

Law enforcement can use you!

Either that or be a "bagger" at the supermarket.

You're just swell.

er, swell

kit brash (kit brash), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)

>I think the tipping point was that I said I was short.

That's fucked up because I said I was tall. I think I got it because I'm a misanthrope.

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 09:57 (twenty years ago)

I am either Silk Spectre or the Comedian.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

i just finished this for the first time. amazing! goddamn.

latebloomer: Pain Don't Hurt (latebloomer), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)

the comic book, i mean.

i scored nite owl II on the quiz thing.

latebloomer: Pain Don't Hurt (latebloomer), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

nine months pass...
http://www.orlyowls.com/submit/images/orlyrorschach.jpg

strongo hulkington is a guy with a belly button piercing (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 18 March 2006 00:41 (nineteen years ago)

robble

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Saturday, 18 March 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

five months pass...
http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/2006/08/this-weeks-project.html

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

ok funny IDEA.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)

I liked it! Last one's rub tho.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah I think it's alright.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

Could've done with that panel of Doc M blowing up the tanks, with the fleeing VCs screaming "Aiiiieeee!! The capitalist monster will kill us all!!!!!" and the like.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 14:39 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

http://filmonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/comedian.jpg
http://www.komics411.com/files/marvel-x-force-7%5B1%5D_2.jpg

Cable's a total aesthetic rip off The Comedian, right? It's only just struck me.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 9 March 2009 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, it was pretty blatant

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Monday, 9 March 2009 16:25 (seventeen years ago)

Watchmen okay. Needs Herbie analog. Bop Vietcong with lollipop.

M.V., Monday, 9 March 2009 18:37 (seventeen years ago)

Cable's a total aesthetic rip off The Comedian, right? It's only just struck me.

I suppose Marshal Law is too.

Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Monday, 9 March 2009 18:40 (seventeen years ago)

whoah ok so i never actually made the comedian+cable connection (but then i tended to avoid liefield comics)

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Monday, 9 March 2009 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

Marshall Law was published almost concurrent with Watchmen, so more likely drawing on the same source material rather than an influence (though Mills/Moore/O'Neill/Gibbons all ran in the same circles).

a golden unicorn who poops diamonds (EZ Snappin), Monday, 9 March 2009 18:45 (seventeen years ago)

judge dredd a clear precursor to marshall law, perhaps also to watchmen

That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 05:18 (seventeen years ago)

2000AD a precursor to most everything I suppose.

Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Tuesday, 10 March 2009 06:54 (seventeen years ago)

Marshal Law could totally beat up The Comedian.

And Cable.

2000AD being a secondary sort of Ur-text for modern comics (alongside 80s Marvel) is an interesting subject for discussion. But let's be clear. Judge Dredd could whup everyone.

Well, maybe not Marshal Law...

Matt M., Tuesday, 10 March 2009 16:32 (seventeen years ago)

Dredd would beat Marshal Law, though it would be a tough fight and he'd get his uniform all torn up and stuff.

chap, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:47 (seventeen years ago)

ten months pass...

Oops.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 4 February 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

okay no

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Thursday, 4 February 2010 15:52 (sixteen years ago)

hahahahahahaaaa

The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 February 2010 16:40 (sixteen years ago)

yyyyyykes!

THE ILC WANTS TO KNOW(!):

WILL PIRATE BATMAN HANG OUT ON THE BLACK FREIGHTER???????????

R Baez, Thursday, 4 February 2010 21:24 (sixteen years ago)

Should only be allowed if they make a Lego Watchmen II video game.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 February 2010 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

And you have to play it whilst on a dance mat and using a Guitar Hero controller simultaneously.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 4 February 2010 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

hopefully sequel will just be Dr. Manhattan coming back to earth and wiping out humanity

The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 February 2010 00:36 (sixteen years ago)

very short one shot. i could see alan moore doing that one.

forksclovetofu, Friday, 5 February 2010 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

First-refusal rights = potentially awesome. I wonder if DC would sue Moore like Geffen sued Neil Young if he produced something they didn't like?

the end times are coming, but they're just the beginning (WmC), Friday, 5 February 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

anyone who actually scabs (not the right word but the best i could come up with) to write/draw these things deserves to have their hands fall off in the night.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 5 February 2010 22:18 (sixteen years ago)

I was thinking of making a poll but all I can suggest the moment are WATCHMANGA and a Tijuana Bible called CAPTAIN METROPOLIS/HOODED JUSTICE TEAM-UP!.

Any ideas for how to hack it up and hypothetically milk this long ripening cash cow via spin-offs, sequels, whatever? (yes, mixing metaphors, don't care)

R Baez, Monday, 8 February 2010 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

Tom Spurgeon has some: http://www.comicsreporter.com/index.php/ddd/

WARWICK. CAPPER. (sic), Monday, 8 February 2010 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://i.imgur.com/GA1Pu.jpg

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 5 June 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

loool

Nhex, Sunday, 5 June 2011 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

glad you did not post that on a weekday

Nhex, Sunday, 5 June 2011 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

Why is his frenulum censored?

free inappropriate education (Abbbottt), Sunday, 5 June 2011 18:51 (fourteen years ago)

to make it safe for work!

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 5 June 2011 19:01 (fourteen years ago)

Well don't I feel silly!

free inappropriate education (Abbbottt), Sunday, 5 June 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)

So apparently there was something about this that came out of Heroes Con yesterday. I don't know what.

Frankly, I hope they make a million sequels. WATCHMEN has made indelible marks on superhero books since then (most not worth reading, but there you have it.) It's only fair that the favor get returned.

Yeah, I still admire WATCHMEN as an artifact of a time, and in places it's still a good novel. But man, did superhero books screw themselves up trying to chase that frisson.

Matt M., Monday, 6 June 2011 00:24 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.