So I read all five last night. I had to ask someone who Henry Pym and his wife were. Then I had to ask who The Avengers were. I get Captain America and The Hulk but I've never even heard of Iron Man before. Thor? What's up with that? He's a hippie?
Are there people who enjoy The Ultimates and stay current with it? It seemed pretty good and I was into it until Banner made himself hulk out and then it just seemed to get "goofy" from there. Like, The Hulk is only around for comic relief.
― Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 19 March 2004 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)
I know who the characters are (some only vaguely though, like the Avengers), but I don't have any attachment to any of them (unlike the X-Men, for ex.). If the writing is good (and is, um, self-aware enough for my jaded comics tastes I guess) I would check it out.
― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 19 March 2004 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)
I enjoy/ed the series immensely, but I think that's more because of my knowledge of the characters being revamped more than the quality of the story. And the art. Love that art. VG's comments are interesting, though, because I'm pretty sure (or was under the impression) that someone could get into the story as is, without the knowledge that these characters in drastically different states outside of _The Ultimates_, but since I came to the seires with all this a priori knowledge, I just took it all for granted.
I didn't mind the "HULK SMASH FREDDIE PRINZE" mood shift in the story that much, if only for a change of pace from the pervasive gloom & doom of the prior 4ish issues. Plus, my encounters with Mark Millar's work have braced me for some unevenness (cf. his _Ultimate X-Men_ run for a particularly egregious example), so I wasn't too surprised. Please note I haven't read these in quite a while - they're under a box underneath another box under some dust & more boxes - so my recollections are possibly spotty. Also, the godawful delays between issues (yay art) allowed the lesser plot points to slip away. Not that there's much nuance going on, excepting some characterization bits that I fear are going to fall aside for more full-screen spectacles (which is fine, to a point, but personally disappointing).
That all said, the sequence in issue #7 (I think) with Hawkeye and Black Widow and other SHIELD agents storming some office building, is COOOOOOL.
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 19 March 2004 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― kenchen, Sunday, 11 September 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 September 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 12 September 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)
I hate his "pop culture" references (which probably will be outdated in five years time) and his apparent dismissal for the whole genre and his readers (once again, the ending of "Wanted"). He should come back to DC. But that's just my opinion.
― Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 12 September 2005 04:35 (twenty years ago)
Amadeo, if you're afeared of aging pop cult refs in your graphically sequential narratives, you should probably stay away from all Marvel and DC comics published between, um, 1939 and 2005.
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 September 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)
I know, if he's not careful he'll start producing pop culture himself.
The France line is FANTASTIC.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 September 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Monday, 12 September 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)
Not that it wasn't enjoyable - I did read the damn thing, and didn't not like it - but there were plenty head-slapping moments that made me feel schmuckish in the process. It's light years better than his 12-part Spidey crap, tho.
As for FRANCE! - it wasn't the one-liner so much that grated my cheese, but the LOOK AT ME splash page of import that accompanied it. It's a throwaway hit-n-run line - it should be treated as such, not attached to some portentous "Cap pointing at A on crest" freeze-frame moment. (If it was a splash page of Cap going KAPOW! Kirby-style while saying it, tho, I'd be #1 fan.)
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 September 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)
I recognize that the pop culture reference was a cheap shot, but I'm still reeling from Wanted (a.k.a. The Eminem And Hale Berry Show) and it's hard to believe that this is the same Millar that wrote Swamp Thing.
― Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 12 September 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 12 September 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 12 September 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)
NB a fuller description would make it sound rubbish, read the comic and let it bump into you.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 September 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
xpost Huk you should write an indie comic.
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
That's 48 pages right there.
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
More quirky autobiographical tales of growing up in Canada. "Guess So" continues with a poignant trip to the toboggan night. And complete in this issue is "Pointed", about love, rejection, and Green Arrow's finger. Huckle #2 was described by Cat Yronwode as "the best comic I've read this month" - discover its unique vision for yourself! $2.50
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/2871422869.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)
i liked the way that the ultimates took a long time to build, and i thought the art was utterly in keeping with the epicness of the script - pure comic strip cinerama
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 3 November 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 3 November 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 4 November 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)
The fact that they've remade Nick Fury by blatantly nailgunning on "...is Samuel L Jackson!" is kind of awesome.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 4 November 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)
which is too bad cuz i like the art and i (semi) like the idea. and maybe i was just having a bad day yesterday where everything kinda sucked (and i was, and everything did).
anyway... i uh brought it back and exchanged it for some other stuff. i love my comic book store. deep-dish discounts and the guy totally let me exchange the book cuz i didn't like it!*
*mind this is also because he recommended it & it was fairly expensive
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Friday, 4 November 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)
I read the one with the twist-ending benevolent alien invasion and it just seemed like regular old crappy superhero bullshit to me.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 4 November 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 4 November 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Friday, 4 November 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 4 November 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)
Me too.
― The Yellow Kid, Friday, 4 November 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)
Ward is right about how moved I am by Grant's JLA, but I've gone on about that often enough here, and that's not what this thread is about.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 November 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)
*which he kinda bit for x-men, eh?
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)
Also alternative futures are probably the best way to do different version of the current characters without having to get 1000 forms signed in triplicate. His DC 1000000 does a similar thing.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 5 November 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)
And he turned out to be a big-time Golden Age fetishist!
― M. V. (M.V.), Saturday, 5 November 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)
― chap (chap), Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:02 (nineteen years ago)
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Sunday, 28 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:47 (nineteen years ago)
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Monday, 29 January 2007 00:22 (nineteen years ago)
― chap (chap), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
Ultimate X-Men has had its occasional moments but now I come to actually try and think of them it's all "Aha in THIS reality [x] is a BAD GUY". So maybe not.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Monday, 29 January 2007 18:30 (nineteen years ago)