The Ultimates

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Made on of my bi-weekly visit to my comic shop yesterday after work. I picked up Y: The Last Man #20, Fables #23, two Hellboy trades, Boneyard Vol. 2, Bear #4, Rex Mundi #8. So now, knowing my tastes, why would my comic seller lend me The Ultimates #1-5 to read and bring back to the shop? He knows I don't have "super-hero" tastes in comics and that I know next-to-nothing about the Marvel universe. (I only get 1602 because I'm addicted to Neil Gaiman's writing.)

So I read all five last night. I had to ask someone who Henry Pym and his wife were. Then I had to ask who The Avengers were. I get Captain America and The Hulk but I've never even heard of Iron Man before. Thor? What's up with that? He's a hippie?

Are there people who enjoy The Ultimates and stay current with it? It seemed pretty good and I was into it until Banner made himself hulk out and then it just seemed to get "goofy" from there. Like, The Hulk is only around for comic relief.

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 19 March 2004 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Does Mark Millar write that? I haven't read any...is it closer to the Grant Morrisonish end of the superhero spectrum or is it more earnest?

I know who the characters are (some only vaguely though, like the Avengers), but I don't have any attachment to any of them (unlike the X-Men, for ex.). If the writing is good (and is, um, self-aware enough for my jaded comics tastes I guess) I would check it out.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 19 March 2004 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Jordan, _The Ultimates_ is snnnnide and bitter (hello, Mr. Millar!) and "realistic" in that post-Watchmen hyperreal way. It's in line with the modern-day vibe the Marvel Ultimates line is toeing, but _The Ultimates_ is the ultimate Ultimate title. There's your supposed demigod / nutjob hippie, your dysfunctional Type A size-changing insect-talking couple, your out-of-touch uber-chivalrous good ol' soldier, your death-defying terminally-ill perpetually-drunk multimillionaire, and your repressed socially awkward scientist. You know, for kids.

I enjoy/ed the series immensely, but I think that's more because of my knowledge of the characters being revamped more than the quality of the story. And the art. Love that art. VG's comments are interesting, though, because I'm pretty sure (or was under the impression) that someone could get into the story as is, without the knowledge that these characters in drastically different states outside of _The Ultimates_, but since I came to the seires with all this a priori knowledge, I just took it all for granted.

I didn't mind the "HULK SMASH FREDDIE PRINZE" mood shift in the story that much, if only for a change of pace from the pervasive gloom & doom of the prior 4ish issues. Plus, my encounters with Mark Millar's work have braced me for some unevenness (cf. his _Ultimate X-Men_ run for a particularly egregious example), so I wasn't too surprised. Please note I haven't read these in quite a while - they're under a box underneath another box under some dust & more boxes - so my recollections are possibly spotty. Also, the godawful delays between issues (yay art) allowed the lesser plot points to slip away. Not that there's much nuance going on, excepting some characterization bits that I fear are going to fall aside for more full-screen spectacles (which is fine, to a point, but personally disappointing).

That all said, the sequence in issue #7 (I think) with Hawkeye and Black Widow and other SHIELD agents storming some office building, is COOOOOOL.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 19 March 2004 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
Hey, I just bought the Ultimates 2 graphic novel, which seemed less dense but somehow more intricate than Ultimates 1. (I have to say that reading the Ultimates is the only time not involving bad Kurt Busiek comics that I've been glad that I spent most of my early comic-reading life reading only John Byrne West Coast Avengers.) Does anyone know when the next trade for Ultimates 2 comes out?

kenchen, Sunday, 11 September 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

hulk smash freddie prinze?

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 11 September 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)

Kenchen, the first issue of the second storyline came out just recently, so I'd guess that the soonest the next volume will be out will be sometime in mid-2006. You're better off buying the individual issues, honestly.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 12 September 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)

I personally don't like The Ultimates that much, or anything Millar has written for the last few years (anyone read "Wanted"? that was some pretentious and ridiculous writing). I think Millar got too involved in the whole "Look at me, I'm uber cool and writing comics for cool kids who are tired of the same old goody two shoes heroes". He's become something of a show-off writer for whom everything is ironic (or post-ironic) and has lost some of the fanboy feeling he had in things like Superman Adventures or Swamp Thing.

I hate his "pop culture" references (which probably will be outdated in five years time) and his apparent dismissal for the whole genre and his readers (once again, the ending of "Wanted"). He should come back to DC. But that's just my opinion.

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 12 September 2005 04:35 (twenty years ago)

Season 2 is beating the pants off on Season 1 (which, some headslapping "A = France" moments aside, was damn good) - more consistent in tone, and chock full of stuff happening. As much as I poo on MM's "look at me" tendencies (oh god Wanted), The Ultimates is where he gets out of his own way and just does the damn thing.

Amadeo, if you're afeared of aging pop cult refs in your graphically sequential narratives, you should probably stay away from all Marvel and DC comics published between, um, 1939 and 2005.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 September 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)

which probably will be outdated in five years time

I know, if he's not careful he'll start producing pop culture himself.

The France line is FANTASTIC.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 September 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

Millar and Romita's current run on Wolverine = super-entertaining mainstream comic bk w/out excessive po-mo pop cult whatevahs

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Monday, 12 September 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

See, I'd file MM's Wolvie run under "meh" - for me, that hypermega arc was all about JR JR. All the things that MM's critics take him to town for - "creative" characterization, speechifying up the wazoo, "oh aren't I too clever for funny books?" pseudo-asides, beating the reader over the head w/ "coolness" (cf. trying to make Northstar a hard-ass, putting Wolvie in charge of a brigade of Sentinels, a bunch of undead villains taking down the Helicarrier) - are in full effect here. That the arc peaked around the 9th chapter and played out the string so Wolvie could replay his favorite scene from Clash Of The Titans didn't help things any.

Not that it wasn't enjoyable - I did read the damn thing, and didn't not like it - but there were plenty head-slapping moments that made me feel schmuckish in the process. It's light years better than his 12-part Spidey crap, tho.

As for FRANCE! - it wasn't the one-liner so much that grated my cheese, but the LOOK AT ME splash page of import that accompanied it. It's a throwaway hit-n-run line - it should be treated as such, not attached to some portentous "Cap pointing at A on crest" freeze-frame moment. (If it was a splash page of Cap going KAPOW! Kirby-style while saying it, tho, I'd be #1 fan.)

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 September 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

I saw the France line while flipping through a trade in a bookstore and I didn't know what to think, it was one of those moments like "should I laugh or cry?". Anyway, I only read the first five issues of the Ultimates, maybe I'll give it a try.

I recognize that the pop culture reference was a cheap shot, but I'm still reeling from Wanted (a.k.a. The Eminem And Hale Berry Show) and it's hard to believe that this is the same Millar that wrote Swamp Thing.

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 12 September 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

I'm a right little bleeding heart and face it, the France line was awesome.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 12 September 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

What was the France line, exactly?

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 12 September 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

It was exactly hilarious and in-character! (David R. OTM that it would have been much funnier without so much attention being brought to it though)

kit brash (kit brash), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, maybe, but as a defining moment (plus a did-they-just-say-that moment) it's still unbeatable.

NB a fuller description would make it sound rubbish, read the comic and let it bump into you.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

Another, later, reference point for Mark Millar comics where things don't go boom all the time: Flash 134, the Jay Garrick and the Thinker issue.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 12 September 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
so i read TPBS 1&2 of this last night after being talked into it by my friendly comic shop dude... and i did enjoy a lot of it, but the pop-culture stuff, the "hulk smash freddie prinze," the totally embarrassing references to bridget fonda and stuff... i couldn't swallow that shit, man. it made me ashamed to be reading it!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

Bridget Fonda?

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

yes. also: the gw bush stuff

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

I am desperately trying to think of when Bridget Fonda was ever a useful pop culture reference. 1993, perhaps?
I knew a girl who sort of looked like BF did in SWF, and I held her hand once after a night of tobogganing.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

I just read the gw bush stuff as Millar being Millar, I'm used to it I guess.

xpost Huk you should write an indie comic.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

I knew a girl who sort of looked like BF did in SWF, and I held her hand once after a night of tobogganing.

That's 48 pages right there.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

96 if you include flashbacks to poignant childhood memories.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

WHO WILL DRAW?

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

Robt. Williams

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Start w/ a splash page of you lying in bed, staring at the ceiling. End w/ splash page of XTREME close-up of you holding hands w/ Ms. Toboggan. The rest writes itself. 3 Eisner noms AT LEAST.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

HUCKLE #3
(Slave Labor, 32pp, b/w, ships Oct 29 1997)

More quirky autobiographical tales of growing up in Canada. "Guess So" continues with a poignant trip to the toboggan night. And complete in this issue is "Pointed", about love, rejection, and Green Arrow's finger. Huckle #2 was described by Cat Yronwode as "the best comic I've read this month" - discover its unique vision for yourself! $2.50

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 3 November 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

Awww.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/2871422869.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

i'm thinking of returning this to the store... i really didn't like it.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

Don't do it!!!!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

should i give it another try? it really left a bad taste in my mouth. every time freddie prinze or whomever's name came up i cringed violently

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

Do it!!!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

For what it's worth, I THINK Ultimates 2 is less pop-cult-laden than the 1st. Though I still love the first 6 issues of the original series.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

If you didn't like the first lot, bail now. (I think it rules, mind.)
Possibly Freddie Prinze jokes were funnier (possibly not) when it first came out a few years back. Isn't the joke that FPJR is a lameor celeb for her to be hanging out with, anyway?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

...and of course, after "The Man", Sam Jackson is automatically a dealbreaker by association.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

Also also: if you want to read a decent team book, er, Legion of Super Heroes is quite charming, and much less self-concious.


Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

slocki i wld say in defense of the ultimates that mainstream marvel comics have always, in a slightly lame 'hip dad' way, sucked up to whatever pop cultural fads, celebs, novelties etc. that are 'current' - i mean, stan lee and jack kirby were middle aged men when marvel became 'marvel pop art productions' circa the mid-sixties, and it wasn't until roy - 'the boy' - thomas that marvel had someone on staff even vaguely in touch, agewise if nothing else, w/ da kids - i'm sure millar knows this, too

i liked the way that the ultimates took a long time to build, and i thought the art was utterly in keeping with the epicness of the script - pure comic strip cinerama

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 3 November 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

Vol 2 definitely jettisons that self-conscious pop-ref. The Freddie Prinze was lame at the time, and even more so for how obviously it was going to date itself inside of 11 months.

kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 3 November 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

i've only read vol 2 (or what of it there is so far) and have enjoyed it alot. i haven't read the first but i'm a big fan of 'assembling the samurai' scenes so if a meaty portion of the first is devoted to this i'll check it out.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 4 November 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

Actually I'm kind of suprised Freddie Prinze has so completely disappeared.

The fact that they've remade Nick Fury by blatantly nailgunning on "...is Samuel L Jackson!" is kind of awesome.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 4 November 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)

the "hip dad" thing is so spot on. it also felt so totally... pandering or something.

which is too bad cuz i like the art and i (semi) like the idea. and maybe i was just having a bad day yesterday where everything kinda sucked (and i was, and everything did).

anyway... i uh brought it back and exchanged it for some other stuff. i love my comic book store. deep-dish discounts and the guy totally let me exchange the book cuz i didn't like it!*


*mind this is also because he recommended it & it was fairly expensive

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)

I have to say I thought it was a reasonably harmless throwaway gag, but whatevs. Sluts, you should grab the Grant M JLA trades, still al little pop-cult, and dreadful art, but much better.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Friday, 4 November 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

i've read some of those! they were cool! except for the baffling superman styles!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

"you should grab the Grant M JLA trades, still al little pop-cult, and dreadful art, but much better."

I read the one with the twist-ending benevolent alien invasion and it just seemed like regular old crappy superhero bullshit to me.

Austin Still (Austin, Still), Friday, 4 November 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Finally, an ally in my "What's the Big Deal with GM's JLA?" crusade!

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 4 November 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)

STEPHEN HAWKING will have his revenge!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 4 November 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)

yeah i never really worked out what was so spesh abt morrison's JLA - martin skidmore virtually blubs when he describes 'em to me, but they didn't seem v. much diff from say the 70s Wein or Englehart issues, and the art is indeed really sucky - i def. prefer the Ultimates (but then I'm a Marvel zuvembie sos...)

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Friday, 4 November 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

Howard Porter got a lot better by his run on the Flash (or possibly the uni-named Livesay is just a friggin' brilliant inker, which is highly likely, since I wasn't nearly as put off by the Val Semeiks art in the new issue of Flash as I was expecting to be).

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 4 November 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

This is the thread where we admit we didn't love GM's JLA.

Me too.

The Yellow Kid, Friday, 4 November 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

I think Chuck is spot on about the Prinze bit - that was certainly never meant to be cool, that was meant to be lame small-time C-list celeb stuff.

Ward is right about how moved I am by Grant's JLA, but I've gone on about that often enough here, and that's not what this thread is about.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 November 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

i didn't love ALL the stuff i read, but rock of ages (is that what it's called)? was terrific--what a great weird surprise that story was*

*which he kinda bit for x-men, eh?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 4 November 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

The "must prevent this future" bit? I think it has a lot of precedents in ye olde-timey comics. Also classic X-men story Days of Future Past would have fit nicely into this category, if it had never been revisited.

Also alternative futures are probably the best way to do different version of the current characters without having to get 1000 forms signed in triplicate. His DC 1000000 does a similar thing.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 5 November 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

it wasn't until roy - 'the boy' - thomas that marvel had someone on staff even vaguely in touch, agewise if nothing else, w/ da kids

And he turned out to be a big-time Golden Age fetishist!

M. V. (M.V.), Saturday, 5 November 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
I enjoyed the first two volumes of this immensely. Very clever and well-executed, with surprisingly nuanced characterisation. A faint sour whiff of cynicism sometimes threatens to overwhelm the fun, but never quite manages. I like how David Icke's lizards=Skrulls.

chap (chap), Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

I think the Ultimates may be my favorite comic since I started getting back into them. It's to Millar's credit that I can't really tell what side of the fascist dick- and flag-waving he comes down on. On one hand, just about every character seems to be lovingly characterized as an asshole, but then one of the most sympathetic characters (to me) is Thor, the biggest leftie.

do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)

I was with The Ultimates right up until the last issue (some double-page fight-straganza), which was just obnoxious as hell.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Sunday, 28 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

dont believe the hpye!

chaki (chaki), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

I reread the whole enchilada today and still love it. There are some serious dialogue malfunctions, though.

do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Monday, 29 January 2007 00:22 (nineteen years ago)

Are any other of the Ultimate books of a similar quality?

chap (chap), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

Ultimate Spiderman is worth a go - if you like one you'll like them all. Doesn't have the nihilist panache of Ultimates though.

Ultimate X-Men has had its occasional moments but now I come to actually try and think of them it's all "Aha in THIS reality [x] is a BAD GUY". So maybe not.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

I kinda love The Ultimates (In a manly way, naturally) Yes it's pointless, stupid and insanely macho (in a self conscious way, of course...) but sometimes that's exactly how I want my superhero comics to be.

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Monday, 29 January 2007 18:30 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.