The Fantastic Four!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Expensive!

I saw an (equally?) expensive dvd set at the store that contains EVERY FF COMIC EVAH (?!) in digital form.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 27 June 2001 03:08 (twenty-four years ago)

three years pass...
I've been reading John Brynes FF Visionaries (issues 232-40), and it's one of the best comics I've read. Though, I wish Reed would stop saying "My Darling" all the time. What else is good in terms of the FF?

Oh, just talk about the Fantastic Four if you like.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 25 February 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

Reed always says "my darling" to Sue, he is old school like that.

If I wasn't doing Popular I would really like to do a page where I read every FF comic and write stuff about them.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

I say this not because it's my favourite comic or anything but I think it refects the changes in mainstream comics since 1961 pretty reliably (with the exception of late-80s grim n gritty I guess) and also its good and bad patches tend to be interestingly good or bad (from a critical perspective).

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

Actually, Tom, w/ all the crap that Byrne put the Invisible Girl through so that she could become the Invisible Woman, I dare say that qualifies as the "grim & gritty" reflection.

Jel, if you like the start of Byrne's run (which you just read), you should be totally enamored w/ everything up to #260 (w/ a mini-renaissance from #286-292). And, of course, it'd behoove you to grab a copy of Essential FF #3 for the peak of the Lee / Kirby FF.

I swear we had an FF thread in the past, but I can't find it (unless I'm just remembering the FF bits of the Byrne & Claremont C/D threads).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

What has been done with the FF in the 90s/00s? All I can think of is that Grant Morrison mini and Ultimate.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 25 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

The 286-292 span was pretty sweet, yeah -- but I second the Byrne recommendation and the Lee/Kirby first and foremost. It's definitely Byrne's strongest work if you don't count X-Men, and shows why he became enough of a fixture that he's gotten away with such dreary crap since.

In the 90s (maybe early 00s) -- Claremont's FF, which was brief but had very good, classic-compatible moments -- his only good work I can think of post-X-Men, and a bright spot in the post-Byrne FF (which dragged through DeFalco and Heroes Reborn, and for a hundred issues or more was one of the most prominent examples of Comics Which Are Published Because We're Used To Publishing Them). Simonson's What The FF -- Ghost Rider, Hulk, Spidey, and Wolverine as "the FF but not really" for two issues -- was funny; I don't remember if Simonson had a longer run (I assume he must have) or if it was any good (I assume it was better than DeFalco's).

I reviewed Englehart's FF: Big Town on doctorpop and was disappointed despite being a huge fan of Englehart at his peak.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 February 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

Simonson was on FF for about 10 issues prior to the WS / Art Adams arc (AKA "What The FF?" - oh, if only that were the official name). I never actually read that arc (which I think was 3 issues), as I dropped out of the hobby just before that was published, but the issues before that weren't all too hot, from what I recall. Please note that I was probably still going through Byrne withdrawal (after 10ish issues of Roger Stern picking up where Byrne up & left, & then 30+ issues of the middling-to-meh Engelhart / Buscema "Oh, For FF's Sake" run).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

Man, did any Marvel franchise make it through the DeFalco lean / glut years w/out losing its shirt, hat, credibility, and pride? (Aside from the Hulkster, which still had PAD at the helm, I think.)

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah, I always forget that Englehart did mainstream FF too. On the surface of it, you'd think their rogues gallery -- Dr Doom, the Puppet Master, the Skrulls (a Skrulls + Puppet Master arc in particular!), the Inhumans -- would make for the greatest Englehart comics ever, but no. He might be the most inconsistent Marvel writer, of the ones to write at least two great runs. (Even his Captain America run had lots of issues that seemed phoned in.)

Has no one mentioned the current Waid run yet? I'm not really looking forward to the JMS run in the future -- the unevenness of his Spidey and my general dislike of his public persona have tainted my appreciation of his better work -- but the Galactus arc of the Waid run is fantastic (ha). And it's probably the arc closest to Byrne's in style and substance.

PAD definitely saved the Hulk from the DeFalco era. Nothing else is jumping to mind, except maybe the tail end (did Deadpool and Black Panther begin in the DeFalco era or is my chronology muddled?). No wonder I was reading so much Vertigo stuff.

Also -- candidate for grim-n-gritty FF: Extra-mutated-super-rocky Thing and SHE-THING.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

Randomly selected favorite FF tropes:

The Poker Game, with participants including Ben Grimm, Dr Strange, Willie Lumpkin, Luke Cage, etc.

Thing/Hulk fights

The Replacement Member, but only pre-300 (with She-Hulk as probably the best of them). It got out of control later, with the Thing-SheThing-Torch-Crystal Double Dating FF crap.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I was thinking of mentioning Waid's run @ first, but I think it's an acquired taste. If you're down w/ Byrne's run & Lee / Kirby, you might want to give it a spin, though it's VERY whimsical - more so than any other FF run I've encountered - and sometimes that whimsy turns cloying (cf. the post-Doom issues dealing w/ Franklin's stay in Hell). FWIW, I love the whimsy, but I can see folks getting turned off by it.

I'm tempted to say the W/W run is like a DC Silver Age version of the FF, from the types of adventures they've had to the way stuff seems to be reset after any harrowing cataclysm occurs (assuming, of course, that the final W/W issue reverts things to a superficial status quo). If anything, Waid's FF is like the "old school fantastical sci-fi" answer to Ellis' Ultimate FF "modern hi-tech sci-fi" take. This is a gross simplification, of course.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:22 (twenty years ago)

I think it's time I recanted my anti-Waid views and admit that I've by and large really really enjoyed Waid's run. I think the Doom/Hell/Heaven epic wasn't all that, but the bits before that and since have been very solid, fun stuff.

Simonson's run was good, I think. Englehart's had good ideas which didn't realise their potential. DeFalco's had awful ideas which didn't realise their potential (even their bad comedy potential). What I'm interested in is that weird hinterland of 70s FF between Kirby leaving and Byrne arriving - Roy The Boy did a long run, did he not? I've only read one issue which was the Surfer and Doom trotting through the motions and was called, oddly, "Zugzwang!". Who zugs wang? You may well ask.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)

Also the latest Ultimate FF is good, I'm tempted to say the first really good issue of that title.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)

NO WAIT I TELL A LIE! I have read other issues from the 70s, specifically the 5-part 'cosmic' story which starts with Gorr The Golden Gorilla and involves (I think) Gabriel the Air-Walker and then has the High Evolutionary FITE Galactus, this may be the one where Galactus is turned into a giant baby.

I'm not sure that was by Roy Thomas. Gerry Conway may be to blame.

My learnings from that story:

i) It wasn't very good.
ii) Is Gorr Marvel's only gorilla character? They certainly seem very rare.
iii) There are very very few Marvel writers who have ever known what to do with the 'cosmic' stuff, and very very many who think they do.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

Speaking of tropes, I don't think you can go wrong w/ a Doom or Galactus story (though I say that having successfully avoided any non-Lee / Byrne / Waid Doom / Galactus arcs). Skrull stories are kinda iffy, I think - I mean, they were subdued in their first appearance by being tricked into turning into cows or some stuff, right?

Hey jel - get the VERY NEXT Byrne Visionaries FF collection (if such a thing exists). It should cover #241-250, and it features a fantastic 3-part Galactus story (w/ oodles of guest stars), as well as probably my favorite FF story of all time (if not my favorite comic of all time), #250, a double-sized issue featuring Spidey and the FF fighting the X-Men!

I think the one thing the Lee / Kirby & Byrne runs shared in common (& why they're so loved by fans) is that they're so COLORFUL - not only in the types of adventures (covering every single sci-fi trope I can think of - interstellar travel, time travel, Fantastic Voyage shrinkidinks, etc etc etc.), but just the multitude of folks the FF ran with, always in bright colorful costumes w/ these remarkable powers from these exotic locales.

The Marvel Universe ran THROUGH the Fantastic Four, and rightfully so - they were the most flexible (har) in terms of the types of stories they could inhabit, and the team's mix of intellectual know-how and brute strength and fantastical gifts and humanity and financial success and public popularity and, of course, the Silver Age pathos (since their greatness was thrust upon them) made them the perfect nexus for any & every damn thing Marvel.

The Fantastic Four was The World's Greatest Comic Magazine because, in essence, it WAS comics, effortlessly bridging the gaps between Golden Age war heroics, sci-fi and horror shenanigans, and the wiser but still bright & shiny Silver Age. Lee & Kirby (veterans of bold the Golden Age and the non-hero age) made it so, and Byrne just went back to the way it was & tapped that rich vein (which, of course, is easier said than done, as latter Byrne FF work will attest).

Of course, it says something that nothing of any lasting significance has come of any post-Lee/Kirby FF - what they created is pretty much what's played with today, and attempts to create something that's not already part of that body of work (like a new Galactus herald) seem to go horribly awry. I can't recall anything NEW Byrne added to the FF mythos that was really worth a damn - Terminus?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)

When I was a wee lad, I had all 14 issues of the Fantastic Four Index, a comic-sized series that offered synopses & important character info. re: the FF - other Marvel series had these things, too, I think. I seem to recall from the Index that right after Kirby left, John Romita took over as artist for a few issues while Lee was still writer, & then Rascally Roy & Jovial John Buscema hopped on board. And then I dunno what happened - they got a TV show, the logo turned crappy, they picked up a robot sidekick, and then woo boy.

I think #200 was drawn by Kirby, actually - dunno who wrote it, but the cover (A TRIPLE-SIZED ADVENTURE!) featured Doom & Mr. F involved in fisticuffs. (This must've been during that time where Kirby made an ever-so-brief return to Marvel - he did a few issues of Captain America around then, too.) I also recall that Byrne did a 10-issue run as artist a few years before he hopped on as writer / artist. Also an FF artist right before Byrne's real run began - BILL SIENKIEWICZ. Inked by Joe Sinnott! Guess who won that FITE?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 February 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)

Kirby's Captain America run would stand collection I think, I picked most of it up cheap a while ago and it's rip-roaring stuff, especially Cap vs THE SWINE.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 25 February 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

They've been there and done that. Go to Gosh and ask them for the Madbomb trade, if you feel like laying down your dime for some missing issues. Not sure if the excellent Bicentennial Battle is part of that...

Vic Fluro, Saturday, 26 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)

I really enjoyed the Byrne run, esp. that annual where we find out what happened with the Skrull cows from one of the earliest issues. But I haven't read it in about 15 years. The Lee/Kirby stuff is fabulous and grand-scale, of course.

Douglas (Douglas), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

Jel, go back and buy the Essentials volumes - everyone should get all five that will collect the whole of the Kirby run, I assume, but there are only three so far, so get them. 3 is magnificent, arguably the best superhero comics ever published, and some reasonable people would remove the words 'arguably' and 'superhero' from that.

I liked the recentish Grant Morrison mini-series too - it has some fantastically strong moments in it, where he manages to give the biggest charge to, for instance, the sentence "I've been thinking."

The original Byrne run I thought was a mess. There are some really good issues, and they all look nice, but he was a huge star then, and too powerful, so whoever the editor was couldn't say "What the fuck are you thinking about tossing away Maximus dying off-panel? And this tall alien woman is rubbish - don't even think of spreading her out across two issues!" There's a really good Dr Doom story, which may have been an annual or anniversary ish, I don't remember.

There's quite a good Wein/Perez, I think, run, in the late 100s. I haven't read it regularly in many years. How is Ultimate FF?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 26 February 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

Ultimate FF tends to be grindingly slow at times if you read it issue by issue - the first six issues are an origin story, the second six issues a fight with Ultimate Dr Doom, the latest three get them into the Negative Zone and on the verge of meeting Ultimate Annihilus. There are some reasonable character bits all through, the idea of making them all late-teens works pretty well, and #15 was a good, high sense-of-wonder sci-fi comic, the best issue yet. The only real low has been the Doom arc but on the other hand the comic hasn't really sparked yet either.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 February 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

Thanks dudes!

I shall definetely check out the Essential FF collections, though maybe I'll invest in the Masterworks (as I kinda like things to be in colour, and plus I'd be tempted to colour it in myself)...and I there is a volume 2 to the JB Visionaries.

When does Galactus first appear??

Oh yeah, I think a Popular style run down of all the FF on Popular would be great, you should do it!

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 27 February 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)

Galactus first shows up in Essential Volume 3, probably the 6th Masterworks, I guess. That third Essential has a golden year featuring the first Black Panther and the first Inhumans as well as the first appearances of Galactus and the Silver Surfer. When my ex-wife read them her reaction was "Well, this is great, but he just keeps shoving big guest stars in just about every issue" and I had to explain that these were all their debuts, and Kirby was just in his most fertile patch ever, in a career that had already set new benchmarks for what 'fertile creativity' could mean.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 27 February 2005 11:51 (twenty years ago)

how many times did galactus appear in the lee-kirby run? i know the surfer pops up a few times but i've only seen a few issues post essential 3.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 27 February 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Jel you should colour it in yourself!! Purple chrome is so mid-60s.

Galactus rocks up again around #75 or so and then goes off to bother Thor so doesn't show up in the Lee/Kirby run after that I don't think.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 February 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

I haven't read much of Byrne's run, though I intend to get those paperback collections at some point in the nearish future. I fell in love with the FF sometime about a year and a half/two years ago. For the longest time, I just had a casual interest, but reading those old Lee/Kirby issues sparked something in me, and then the Morrison 1234 series pushed that further, and it went over the top with Waid/Weiringo's run, which I love very much. I was heartbroken to learn a week ago that there is only one more issue to go in Waid's run - I had no idea! As far as I'm concerned, his FF is pitch-perfect, everything I love about the characters and the FF made shiny and new again. I like the lighter touch. Grant Morrison's FF probably was a bit closer to the old Lee/Kirby in some ways, if just cos it was a bit creepy and tense and weird.

I read a couple issues of Ultimate FF, and I hated them with a real burning intensity. Everything I loved about Reed Richards was stripped away, and I just have no time for that.

I'll stick around for JMS' FF, but I doubt I'll like it. Dan Slott's new Thing series would probably be a lot more fun, even though he's my least favorite member of the team.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

How do you all feel about the Loeb/Pacheco run? I'd kinda like to read that, but mostly cos I have a soft spot for Carlos Pacheco's art from when he drew the X-Men.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

Oh, you know what else was very good? James Sturm's Fantastic Four: Unstable Molecules series. I'm kinda amazed that Marvel published that one.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

Tom, what do you like about having the FF as teenagers/college kids in the Ultimate FF? To me, the fact that Reed Richards is a bit older than the average superhero is part of his appeal. I like that he's this mid-30s professor type. I like that Sue Storm is significantly younger than him. I think that context works.

But then again, I think that even as good as the Waid run has been, the FF only REALLY makes sense in the context of the 60s.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

If the Ultimate line was an actual retcon and there wasn't the 'real' FF, I'd hate it*. I said 'it works' rather than 'I like it' - older Reed still works better and he's one of my favourite characters too. But as a contrast I like it - them being teens makes the constant childish bickering between Johnny and Ben make a bit more sense, and the teen Richards is the old Marvel 'geek with powers' trope updated for a world in which geeky teens with big ideas become paper millionaires.

*this goes for several of the 'Ultimate' characters, though several more are terrific.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 February 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

The Simonson run is not getting anywhere near enough love here. Prior to the Art Adams issues with the Hulk/Spidey/Ghost Rider/Wolverine he'd been on the title for about a year, as writer and artist. Easily his best post-Thor work, his stories were very Kirby in their epic scope but also very Simonson in their characterisation and humour.

When I was a kid, I loved the Byrne issues. That old 3-part Galactus storyline was released in a trade about a decade ago, maybe more - "The Trial Of Galactus". Great stuff.

David N (David N.), Monday, 28 February 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

If I wasn't doing Popular I would really like to do a page where I read every FF comic and write stuff about them.

do you mind if i steal this idea, tom? i think i'd really like to do this!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 28 February 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)

The Byrne issue of FF when they transport the Inhumans' city to the moon and then Quicksilver's baby is born is one of the greatest comics ever.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Monday, 28 February 2005 05:35 (twenty years ago)

The Byrne issue of FF when they transport the Inhumans' city to the moon

the Moon.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Monday, 28 February 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

THE MOON

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 28 February 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)

JD I'm still really really tempted to do it. I might do it just as a thread on here though, anyway there's room for two FF Index style ridiculosities in the world.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 28 February 2005 10:30 (twenty years ago)

Please note the 1st index only went up to issue #112 or so!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 28 February 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

The best FF comic book ever isn't even an FF book; it's Planetary #6, which is far and away the best hatchet-job ever done on a superhero franchise.

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Monday, 28 February 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

Ooh those dangerous deconstructionists!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 28 February 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

Jel, if you like the start of Byrne's run (which you just read), you should be totally enamored w/ everything up to #260 (w/ a mini-renaissance from #286-292).

Ha ha - I read the Byrne run back then, but I started at #268 and stopped after #283 - I missed the good stuff!

The Yellow Kid, Wednesday, 2 March 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

IT'S THREAD BUMPIN' TIME!

On Boomerang (Cartoon Network's adjunct network, showing nothing but old school cartoons) broadcasts episodes of the Fantastic Four cartoon @ 11:30 PM EST on Sunday. Wooo boy. I caught snippets of episodes featuring the Red Ghost & Galactus (& the Watcher, of course, because he's always there). Notes:

1) Theme music - sub-Brubeck (ha - almost typed Brubaker) wordless jazz hoohah, showing off the FF in action (against Galactus, and giants with spears, and round opaque balls).

2) Galactus is PURPLE AND GREEN

3) Johnny Storm sounds like the Kirby idea of a kid - I was expecting him to show up wearing a bowtie and a plaid blazer (w/ elbow pads).

4) GALACTUS IS PURPLE AND GREEN and talks like THE HULK. What, they didn't have reverb back in 1967?

5) The Ultimate Nullifier looks like a perfume bottle.

6) They quote big chunks of dialogue (and plot) verbatim (cf. Reed's "face-off" against Galactus w/ the Ultimate Chanel in hand), which doesn't always work. (The POWER and GRANDEUR of STAN LEE and his OTHERWORLDLY WORDSMITHERY doesn't TRANSLATE too well when you actually have actors SAY THE WORDS!) Also, if you're going to show the Human Torch's journey to fetch the Ultimate Nullifier, SHOW THE DAMN JOURNEY! Don't just go "here's Johnny flying into Galactus' Mobius strip" / scene w/ Surfer & Galactus playing tiddlywinks while the FF waits / "here's Johnny leaving Galactus' ship".

7) Instead of punishing the Silver Surfer to an eternity of wandering the Earth ... ALONE ... Galactus just up & leaves, saying, "ha ha ha, until next time, SURFER" as if they're cosmic sparring partners.

8) Best voice work = The Thing (nice, gruff, groovy) & the Red Ghost (proper evil "accent").

9) Best animation = the Red Ghost's monkeys, because they're monkeys.

10) One glaring omission from the opening credits = WHERE'S DOCTOR DOOM?!?!?! No, no, no - kids want to see the FF go up against boring giants w/ spears and Superballs, not their #1 arch-nemesis. That would SUCK.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 14 March 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

As for Tom's OTM "oooh deconstruction is so hot right now" jab - I'd like to think that WE's takes / riffs on all of those tropes & icons in Planetary are just using the source material (the FF, the pulp characters) as launching pads to go off on semi-related tangents that are just interesting flights of fancy & not meaningful critiques or pisstakes of the creative catalyst. Compare the respectful & divergent analogues in Planetary to the WTF-ever "homages" in Wanted.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 14 March 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

ALSO, in regards to the FF cartoon: the Silver Surfer sounded like a poncey Woody Allen trying to act proper & riff on Olde Tyme Englishe. Awfulle.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 14 March 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, that's otm, I think -- there are elements of Planetary in common with what you'd find in a deconstruction or deliberate critique of the FF, but there are elements of FF in common with the Challengers of the Unknown and the whole scientific adventurers genre -- in neither case is one primarily a response to the other. (The FF:Planetary relationship is similar, really, to the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and Nero Wolfe; Stout's Wolfe/Goodwin stories could be taken as a critique of Holmes -- "well, if he's so good at deduction and everything, he wouldn't even have to live the house, and hey, what if his Watson was this tough Sam Spade type" -- but they weren't, and their appeal and longevity were not based in "that'll show Conan Doyle!")

.. xpost, I don't know if Silver Woody is otm

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 14 March 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I wish it was Silver Woody - "gee, Galactus ... I-I-I-I don't know about this ... they seem like such nice people ... and their women! Wow! Look at that one in the go-go boots. Gee, I'd like to ride her swells."

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 14 March 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

And then he uses the Power Cosmic to summon Bogie to advise him!

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 14 March 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
Update! This JB Visionaries series has been great, I'm half way through volume 4 now. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry at the trail of Reed Richards story - JB himself guest stars.

I bought the most FF tPB, the one where Johnny Storm is the herald of Galactus, looks promising.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

Good god does the movie look terrible.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

I did see the most recent Warren Ellis trades (is that what you're talking about, jel?) on display at Barnes & Noble in preparation for the movie, alongside every Batman trade they could dig up.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)

I saw a huge display of Sin City as well, with that horrible "Now a major movie/motion picture !" sticker emblazoned all over.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

but the guy who plays the Human Torch = hubba hubba

Mark C (Markco), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

He is cute. And I really like Julian McMahon in Nip/Tuck so I think he could be a decent Dr. Doom. However, the trailer makes it look pretty lame. I'll still probably see it though.

Leon hearts Crazy Frog (Ex Leon), Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

The trailer is a bit lame. Dr Doom looks too shiny and tinny

Mark C (Markco), Thursday, 2 June 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

Aw, the trailer looks cool! I don't know too much about the FF story (I read the first few issues of Ultimate FF when it first came out but never got to Dr. Doom), but seeing Michael Chiklis as the Thing... [sigh] I'm in love.

Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 3 June 2005 09:58 (twenty years ago)

The Thing looks like he's made of rubber, the spongey kind, the kind of rubber they used to make indoor footballs out of. I think they got a job lot for the movie.

Anyway, it'll just be another dose of Jessica Alba, that's good enough for me!

I doubt if I'll be able to stop myself from making loud tutting noises during the film.

It was the Mark Waid trade, Rising Storm, I think we are a bit behind!

jel -- (jel), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

OMG people need to stop harping on the Thing thing. Geeks should know that's what he looked like when he first appeared, and non-geeks should just be busy ogling over McMahon or Alba to not bother w/ this stuff.

I think Jordan & jel are confusing the Ultimate FF (by Ellis) w/ the 616 FF (by Waid).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

Oh man, I though my observation was unique to me :(

jel -- (jel), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

Geeky isolation.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

Excellent! Another fan's hopes and dreams dashed by ... THE JADED SCORPION!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 3 June 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
Just ordered the Fantatic Four Omnibus that came out recently - the first 30 issues and annual one, plus the original letters pages!!! I am very excited!

jel -- (jel), Monday, 18 July 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

Anyone read the Marvel Knights Four? I was looking at the second trade a while ago - not having been aware that the first had even come out - and it looked interesting enough.
Anyone?

David N (David N.), Monday, 18 July 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

Marvel Knights 4 is probably the weakest of the three main titles, but Sue is teh hawtest in it.

The plot arc with the kids on a camping trip has probably been my favourite.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 07:34 (twenty years ago)

I've just finished reading Essentials 4, in which Lee and Kirby seem to be cruising slightly after the heady delights of Vol 3, although all of Jack's splash pages are completely pulsepoundarific.


REED TO SUE: Wives should be kissed and not heard!

chap who would dare to thwart the revolution (chap), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

essential FF 4 is out??? it's off to the comic book store for me!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 21 July 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
Way way upthread I said "oh I'd like to do a column about every FF issue". Well, I scaled down my ambitions a bit but I have kind of started that column:

[Removed Illegal Link]

Groke, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)

REMOVED ILLEGAL LINK???

Groke, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)

That Illegal Link in full

Groke, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)

(5 years ago)

!!!

OK, that can't be right, ILC started in Jan. 2004, I think.

Leee, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)

Has Nu-ILX decided that all links to personal blogs/websites should be forbidden? Consequences of the state vs Pau! 3dward Wag3mann case!

Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 22 February 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)

I think I fell foul of the timed logout.

Groke, Thursday, 22 February 2007 11:46 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Kind of weird how the FF have been pushed to the margins of the Marvel U.

WmC, Friday, 20 November 2009 04:55 (fifteen years ago)

Hickman's doing a great job with them after the mediocre and plainly dumb Millar run. Feels like the Big Science Adventure it should be.

EZ Snappin, Friday, 20 November 2009 13:08 (fifteen years ago)

u mad doggie, millar's run was the best since john byrne!

ff is becoming marvel's superman or mickey mouse - ie foundational characters that don't really excite the kids any more.

im impressed by the way that bendis has made the avengers THE marvel superhero team these days

Ward Fowler, Friday, 20 November 2009 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

The FF were seen as a bit white bread amongst my contemporaries when I was a kid, certainly not as sexy and dangerous as The X-Men. I got dissed for liking them a few times.

Communi-Bear Silo State (chap), Friday, 20 November 2009 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

Millar didn't get the characters or what made FF so good in the hands of Kirby/Lee and Byrne - science adventure thrillpower. Lame-ass alt future FF's and dopey uber-Doom were bad ideas drawn out into big hot messes. I did kind of like the Lovecraftian town story, but I still don't think the characters were done well. I think Hickson had to reset Reed Richards after years of abuse and did a good job of it.

EZ Snappin, Friday, 20 November 2009 13:41 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think the FF were ever really central characters in the Marvel U.--it just happened to be the series that Lee & Kirby clicked (together) best on, and nearly everybody since then has just made it a mash note to Lee/Kirby. (Also, you can't put the FF in any story to make it more interesting the way you can with, say, Spider-Man.)

That said, I'm curious to read both the Millar/Hitch and Hickman/Eaglesham versions.

Douglas, Friday, 20 November 2009 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think the FF were ever really central characters in the Marvel U.-

Hmm, I disagree with this pretty strenuously, Douglas. I agree that Spider-Man was the x-over guest star of choice for decades (until Wolverine maybe?), but I'm thinking a little more meta. The Marvel U always struck me as an FF-centric concept -- they were the first superhumans (except for special dispensations given to the ur-supers Cap and Namor, and then gradually the rest of Timely), Reed Richards always had the rep of Smartest Man Alive (Stark's elevation seems like a relatively recent phenomenon), Reed was kind of pompous in his status as The Most Moral Man Alive. They (and Thor) opened up the Marvel U to more cosmic plots and characters. When Reed and Sue got married, the obvious move was to have every super on the planet go and either pay their respects or try to kill them.

And then the recent history...Reed and Stark disgraced for their attempts at godplaying/social engineering. The differences between how Stark's fall (criminal on the lam) and Reed's fall (semiseclusion, semi-exile) have played out in the last year or two have been pretty interesting. I would be amazed if Quesada and Bendis hadn't worked this all out in great detail at Marvel editorial retreats.

WmC, Friday, 20 November 2009 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

I read the first trade of Millar's FF run. It was kind of entertaining, but... there was something oddly hollow about it. Have to agree that the alternate future FF didn't really strike me as good. It felt like an Exiles or Ultimate FF story, the way the consequences felt more trivial than the story was trying to achieve, despite the epic scale of it. I don't think I'm explaining this correctly, but does someone else get what I'm saying? Maybe I'm just tired of the epic widescreen action of Millar and Hitch.

Nhex, Saturday, 21 November 2009 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

Has any of the Byrne run been Essentialised yet?

Communi-Bear Silo State (chap), Saturday, 21 November 2009 18:01 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.