NYRB article on Lethem and comix

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Welcome to New Dork

By John Leonard

Men and Cartoons

by Jonathan Lethem

Doubleday, 160 pp., $19.95

The Disappointment Artist

by Jonathan Lethem

Doubleday, 149 pp., $22.95

The Fortress of Solitude

by Jonathan Lethem

Vintage, 528 pp., $14.95 (paper)

1.

In The Fortress of Solitude, his great white whale of a novel, Jonathan Lethem chases after childhood, neighborhood, and the American leviathan of race
relations. In Men and Cartoons, a grab bag of his stories, he paddles a kayak downstream over waters not exactly rapid. Old friends from elementary school
reappear in order to deplore the compromises and corruptions of their former classmates. Bygone parents are revealed to have been capable of secret, sexual
exultations. Young lovers in a burgled house go to bed with the ghosts of past relationships made visible by a magic spray. Artists, agents, editors, opticians,
and a talking sheep named Sylvia Plath negotiate dystopias of gridlock. In "Access Fantasy," one character lives in his car in a city-wide traffic jam on the
wrong side of a One-Way Permeable Barrier.

But the joke's on Hemingway. According to Lethem, men without women employ comic books to compensate for their absence. When his characters aren't
listening to Frank Zappa and the Talking Heads, or dreaming up scenarios for interactive video games, or hiring out as "advertising robots" at the local
Undermall, or destroying the world with air bags made of cabbages, they are thinking about Stan Lee and R. Crumb, Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four,
Daredevil, Dr. Doom, and Captain America. If Norman Mailer, Thomas Pynchon, Walt Whitman, and Carl Jung show up in "Super Goat Man," the most
ambitious of these stories, they are really only red herrings or highbrow beards in an epic tale of an Electric Comics superhero from the Sixties who is reduced
in the Eighties to teaching a college seminar on "Dissidence and Desire: Marginal Heroics in American Life 1955–1975."

Mostly, though, the comics mentioned in Men and Cartoons aren't published by Electric. Or DC, Raw, or Fantagraphic. They bear the brand of Marvel
Comics, "which anyone who read them understood weren't comic at all but deadly, breathtakingly serious. Marvel constructed worlds of splendid complexity,
full of chilling, ancient villains and tormented heroes, in richly unfinished story lines." Lethem's nerds entered into those complex worlds back in grammar
school and junior high, between the ritual humiliations of pubescence. In years to come of pink slips, eviction notices, and deleted icons, of fax machines and
vibrators, these Marvel worlds are the vistas in their mediated heads. They see in panels, talk in balloons, and feel in lurid colors. But how can a Columbia
professor who plays party games (in "The Vision"), a museum director for acquisitions of drawings and prints (in "Vivian Relf"), or a cartoonist for a free
music magazine published by a record store chain (in "Planet Big Zero") ever be expected to compete with the likes of Vision, the android in the Avengers
series who could vary the density of his body from bullet-stopping diamond-hard to blue-smoke phantom fuzzy? Or Black Bolt, the noblest member of a band
of outcast mutants known as the Inhumans, whose superpower was speech itself:

The sound of his voice was cataclysmic, an unusable weapon, like an atomic bomb. If Black Bolt ever uttered a syllable the world would crack
in two.

In other words: once there were giants, with magical powers, secret identities, Technicolored underwear, and swishy capes. Male adulthood proved to be much
less fun than the masked dreams of pop culture had led little boys to believe. Growing up stunted us. The primary emotions and psychic wounds of the Marvel
superhero are as drums and trumpets to the disappointed marimba tinkle and sneezy regrets of the fortysomething salaryman. "Perhaps," says Lethem,
"superheroism was a sort of toxin, like a steroid, one with a punitive cost to the body" —but we can't help feeling that, for him, we traded in the experience of
living large (James Dean, Godzilla) for the poignant (a wild pitch, a broken shoe lace) and the ignoble (cowardice, envy: "Bite my crank, Super Goat
Man!"—the taunt of two college boys trying to provoke the aging comic book hero to use his superpowers as he climbs a clock tower toward them and the
giant paper clip they wave down at him as if it were an "enormous phallus").

Sad-making. Pop nostalgia clings like a kudzu weed to everyone who ever grew up feeling alien-freaky—i.e., all of us who somehow knew we were born to die
uncool. Having posted my sugarbomb boxtop to Battle Creek, Michigan, in 1947, I was the first little boy on my block to own a Lone Ranger atomic bomb
ring. I examined the color photo of a mushroom cloud while listening, on the radio, to "Mr. Keen, Tracer of Lost Persons." Such a perfect dorky pathos and
this was long before marijuana made everything seem more interesting than it really is.

Even so, from a young writer as clever as they come and as crafty as they get, who skinwalked and shape-changed from Kurt Vonnegut into Saul Bellow before
our starry eyes, whose Huckleberry Brooklyn novel brought municipal fiction back from the dead, the whimsies in Men and Cartoons look like arrested
development. And The Disappointment Artist, a collection of Lethem's journalism and reminiscences, seems at first to be more of the same. Whole chapters
are devoted to John Ford's westerns, Philip K. Dick's science fiction, Star Wars, John Cassavetes, and Stanley Kubrick. Page after page celebrates recording
artists such as Chuck Berry, David Bowie, the Beatles, Elvis Costello, Brian Eno, Pink Floyd, and Cheap Trick, and such science fiction writers as Frank
Herbert and Jules Verne. And when the loftier likes of Kafka, Borges, and Lem, or Faulkner, Beckett, and Joyce, or Cynthia Ozick, Grace Paley, and William
Gass are mentioned at all, they will be fingered in brusque passing as "professional Bartlebys." It's not as if he's never met them; they show up in his novels,
wearing turtlenecks and trench coats; they hang in his closet. Yet not one is worthy here even of a paragraph.

Do we care that Lethem saw John Ford's The Searchers twelve times and Star Wars twenty-one, or that his "fever for authenticity" led him to Anthony
Newley, or that he still believes the Fantastic Four superheroes were the Rubber Soul and the White Album of comics? (Do you care how many times I have
seen The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, or what's going on in my head while I watch Sara Evans sing "Suds in the Bucket" on the country music cable channel?)
Is it so unreasonable to want to know more of what he thinks about Julio Cortázar and less of how he feels about Obi-Wan Kenobi? To wish for a few words
explaining why he stopped reading Don DeLillo, rather than thousands more on Red Sonja, Howard the Duck, and Marvel's "existential loners"? And then this,
as if Jean Genet instead of Jonathan Lethem were Marveling in the Seventies:

I'm breaking down here. The royal we and the presumptive you aren't going to cut it. This is a closed circuit, me and the comics which I read
and which read me, and the reading of which by one another, me and the comics, I am now attempting to read, or reread. The fact is I'm dealing
with a realm of masturbation, of personal arcana. Stan Lee's rhetoric of community [i.e., of comic book readers] was a weird vibrant lie: every
single true believer, every single member of the Make Mine Marvel society or whatever the fuck we were meant to be called, received the
comics as a private communion with our own obscure and shameful yearnings, and it was miraculous and pornographic to so much as breathe
of it to another boy, let alone be initiated by one more knowing. We and you don't know a thing about what I felt back then, anymore than
I know a thing about what you felt.

The fact is that we do know what he felt back then, and he knows what we felt, and so do you. It's obvious, blatant, standardized, like the generic reality
experienced by the futuristic Oakland detective in his first novel, Gun, With Occasional Music—which is what pop culture does to our obscure and shameful
yearnings, which is why it's helpful to feather your nest and prime your pump by branching out into Bible stories, Greek myths, Grimm fairy tales, Romantic
poetry, grand opera, anthropology, psychoanalysis, and maybe even what Lethem calls "the violently solitary and elitist necessities of High Art." But because he
has been at it for a while, because The Disappointment Artist is already his tenth book, he has a surprise sleight-of-mind in store. In an essay on Edward
Dahlberg, prince of churls, he tips his hand. Dahlberg's memoir of his Kansas City childhood, Because I Was Flesh, is "a great book" in "the saddest and
simplest way, for Dahlberg has arrayed an armor of rhetoric to fend off his pain, and everywhere the armor proves inadequate."

And what, exactly, was Flesh saying? It was saying, Lethem explains, "I want my mama." So does Lethem want his mama, the one who called him "kiddo,"
sent him to public school in Brooklyn, steered him toward Isaac Asimov and Ray Bradbury, took him to Star Wars screenings, and worried maybe he was
gay; the young woman who, before she gave birth to Lethem, was a Queens College dropout, a barefoot Jewish folksinger, an ear-piercing Greenwich Village
beatnik, a draft-counseling campus wife of an avant-garde artist/SDS professor, a pot-smoking hippie matron in favor of open marriage and day care centers,
opposed to war, grapes, nuclear power, and Robert Moses. She died at age thirty-six from a brain tumor in 1978, after giving her son a typewriter for his
fourteenth birthday, on which the next summer he wrote his first book. He was confined by her counterculture assumptions, which "I both bloomed within, like
the windows of a greenhouse, and rattled against, like the jaws of a trap." Canvassing his own pop culture enthusiasms and obsessions, his furious fandom, he
finds evasions, surrogates, anodynes, screens, beards, and a parental figure in the carpet bombing. On the one hand, as a motherless boy,

Growing up in an artist's family, I seized on comic books and science fiction as a solution to the need to disappoint my father's expectation
that I become an artist like himself. These tastes encompassed my real passions: for art that embraced the vernacular vibrancy of pop music
and film, and for fusions of imaginative material with the mundane. But they also served as a beard on my own ambition, a cloak on my
reverence for the esteemed artifacts of my parents' universe.

On the other, he asked too much:

Attempting to burrow and disappear into the admiration of certain works of art, I tried to make such deep and pure identification that my
integrity as a human self would become optional, a vestige of my relationship to the art.

Works of art can be better than the real world, and maybe even redeem it, but not even Marvel comics can be "both safer than life and fuller, a better family.
That they couldn't give." According to Lethem, the first song John Lennon recorded after the Beatles' breakup was called "My Mummy's Dead." Listening to
his own past, he hears something that sounds similar: "Each of my novels, antic as they may sometimes be, is fueled by loss. I find myself speaking about my
mother's death everywhere I go in this world."

"IF BLACK BOLT EVER UTTERED A SYLLABLE THE WORLD WOULD CRACK IN TWO."

2.

Hardboiled bittersweet, that's Conrad Metcalf, the private investigator in Gun, With Occasional Music (published in 1994 and reissued in 2003), a Philip
Marlowe, a Lew Archer, but also a Primal Scream in a Brave New Noir: "The thing I wanted wasn't lost in the past at all, and it never had been. It was lost in the
future. A self I should have been, but wasn't." Never mind the Sam Spade case he thinks he's working on, which involves the torture and murder of a sheep.
Keep your eye on the kangaroo. Or the sow, ape, and dachshund, all of whom are "evolved." We are living in a near future of animal hybrids and designer
drugs (Acceptol, Regrettol, Forgettol, Believol, Avoidol); of cash registers that play orchestral music when the drawer's open, trash cans that flourish trumpets,
water fountains that spout pop tunes, parking meters that strum Hawaiian bottleneck guitar, and tape-deck cranial implants of your own memories edited so you
can safely answer any question; where "spoken-word news" and the printed word are against the law, and psychology students go door to door ringing your
bell to read out loud from Sigmund Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents.

Already you are smiling. What amazed about Lethem from the start was this amiability, this ramshackle construction, this loose-limbed ambling through the
genres. To each pulpy occasion, instead of masks or capes, he wore sneakers, sweats, leather, shades. He licked the language as if it were a lollipop: "I'll have
my lips removed as soon as I learn a way to whistle out my asshole." But also from the beginning he was bereft. In Gun, With Occasional Music, see the
creatures called Babyheads. The near future has decided that it takes too long to grow a kid, during which they are too noisy and ask too many questions,
anyway. So, using the same "evolution therapy" that got kangaroos up and talking, scientists fiddled with the human growth process and managed to speed it
up so much that you now see toddlers at "babybars" with little yellow fish on their red jumpers and cigarettes tucked behind their ears.

In Amnesia Moon (1995), where Jack Kerouac and Philip K. Dick will meet Mel Gibson's Road Warrior and Vladimir Nabokov's Humbert Humbert after the
bombs have fallen on America, the sky is purple with radiation poisoning, the mountains are full of biochemical amnesiac fog, and mutants from the "rupture"
think they can talk to dolphins, almost everybody is bereft. Chaos, for instance, is a character personified here as if Lethem were Milton or Hobbes; he lives in
the projection booth of a multiplex in Hatfork, Wyoming, and is forever dreaming someone else's dreams. And then there is Melinda, the fur-covered
adolescent girlchild, some kind of selkie out of Celtic folklore, hitching a ride with Chaos to Emerald City and the Wizard of Oz. And Edie, who seeks to
improve her Finite Subjective Reality but always flunks her bad-luck test. Not to mention Case Hotchkiss, Everett Moon, Vance Escrow, and Dawn Crash in
the Submission District of San Francisco, where, after the fragmentation caused by bombs, they long for "a sort of viral coherence"; they wait for Godot and
gestalt.

If Amnesia Moon is Pynchon Lite, like Pynchon's Vineland, it is also the Philip K. Dickiest of Lethem's novels. Except that Dick was a paranoid
pillhead—genuinely convinced, according to his most recent biographer, that telepathic Soviet scientists tried to jam his neural frequencies by bombarding him
with abstract splatters of Kandinsky and Picasso from the Hermitage— whereas Lethem is known to hang out at McSweeney's, where the writers want to make
a community; and the coherence he longs for throughout his books, the gestalt, is family.

As She Climbed Across the Table (1997) sounds funnier in synopsis than it reads on the page. Alice, a particle physicist, disappears through the looking glass
at the university computer center into "a false vacuum bubble" which may or may not be a homegrown black hole. Philip, the anthropologist who loves her, is
jealous but helpless. Alice is smitten with "an absence or failure to happen" and "an explosion of metaphor into a literal world"—which takes a phenomenal
form she calls Lack. Only after light bulbs, slide rules, bowling shoes, ashtrays, pomegranates, and a boxed edition of Lewis Carroll's The Hunting of the
Snark have all vanished into Lack will Alice decide to follow. What nobody realizes is that Lack, hungry for meaning, has borrowed his personality from
Alice, who doesn't approve of herself. Nor is the resident deconstructionist, George De Tooth, much help: "Physics seeks to dismantle the surface, perceive
behind it, to a truth comprised of particles; I argue against depth wherever I find it."

So Don DeLillo's White Noise meets Richard Power's Galatea 2.2, except that DeLillo and Powers go deeper. Still, there is one of the best seduction lines in
or out of any academic novel: "What I would be interested in seeing is you exhibit your tropism." And surely DeLillo himself wrote these sentences: "That
morning forest fires to the north produced a carpet of ash that reddened the skies. The sun glowed orange in the east, an eerie morning sunset. The gray flecks
settled in a fine coat over windshields, automatic teller machines, and public art."

But back to family, about which Girl in Landscape (1998) is especially eloquent, a prose riff on John Ford's The Searchers but it is also Lethem's Passage
to India, as well as a wonderment in which a Catcher in the Rye reads the Martian Chronicles in a Little House on the Prairie. Pella is thirteen years old, living
beneath a poisoned earth with her younger brothers, when their father, Clement, loses an election and their mother, Caitlin, dies of a brain tumor. So it's off by
freezer ship to the Planet of the Archbuilders and a frontier settlement on a "landscape of remembrance," a dream terrain of eroded spires and ancient tombs,
with black sand and mourning sculptures, fish potatoes and lynch mobs, indigenes with evocative names like Hiding Kneel and Truth Renowned, and miniature
deer so quicksilver swift they might very well be ghosts.

On this "Planet of Withheld Explanations," the adolescent Pella experiences the terrors of adult sexuality ("The girl's body was pretentious with
womanhood"), Lethem finds his first fully fledged character, the reader emerges from a sci-fi western more complicated than he was going in, and we glimpse
the homesteading to come in the Brooklyn of Rachel, Abraham, and Dylan in The Fortress of Solitude. Once upon a time, the mother, Caitlin, told her strong,
smart daughter Pella: "Don't you think arms are brave? They just go on, they never get tired or give up or complain." So when Pella, the pioneer woman, raises
a new town on an old planet, she already has not only a name for it, Caitlin, of course, but also a motto worthy of a Vonnegut: "Be brave like an arm."

Motherless Brooklyn (1999) is the novel favored by readers of Lethem who'd rather he hadn't entered the mainstream, a peculiar resentment indeed on the part
of people who otherwise complain that the mainstream unfairly disdains their populist subversions, their pulp-proud underground, their monastic cells and
hermetic texts. About the mainstream: love it or leave it. To want to eat the flowers and sleep in the Hide-a-Bed of the very same rectal-thermometer
establishment whose walls you have pledged to "tag"—do your graffiti—seems to me to be uncool. But Motherless Brooklyn, in which Lionel Essrog is only
one of many orphans in the hired-muscle and private-eye service of a smalltime hood, is way cool, as if Tony Shalhoub's Monk, the obsessive-compulsive
TV detective, and Philip Roth's Mickey Sabbath had teamed up to solve an Oedipal crime. Lionel, moreover, speaks in tongues. Like Mozart and Malraux, he is
afflicted with Tourette's syndrome. He can't help turning everything he hears into a linguistic freak show, "spirit or animal possession, verbal epileptic seizure,
whatever," with "a flapping, inane mouth that covered the world in names and descriptions," and "no control in my personal experience of self."

What happens as Lionel, determined to avenge the murder of the mafioso who got him out of St. Vincent's Home for Boys, follows a deadly trail from a
Yorkville zendo with some very odd monks to a Sushi Oceanfood Emporium on the rocky coast of Maine, past recollected images of Marlon Brando, Ross
MacDonald, Daffy Duck, and the Green Hornet, is a brilliant game of verbal tags. ("Ducky fucking Bent!" should appeal to baseball fans who will never
forgive the Yankee shortstop Bucky Dent for his playoff home run against the Red Sox.) Not only is the narrator unreliable; he has run amok: "I'm a tightly
wound loose cannon." He could be compared to Benjy in The Sound and the Fury, or Oskar in The Tin Drum, or the Hunchback of Notre Dame; to a
Greek who can only talk in vehement dithyrambs, an Elizabethan stuck in iambic pentameter, a waterbug in Kafka, an elephant in Aida, or Gogol's nose. And,
as usual with Lethem, Lionel blames himself for what he's lost:

Is guilt a species of Tourette's? Maybe. It has a touchy quality, I think, a hint of sweaty fingers. Guilt wants to cover all the bases, be
everywhere at once, reach into the past to tweak, neaten, and repair. Guilt like Tourettic utterance flows uselessly, inelegantly from one helpless
human to another, contemptuous of perimeters, doomed to be mistaken or refused on delivery.

Nevertheless, remember what your mother told you. BE BRAVE LIKE AN ARM.

3.

So we arrive at last at The Fortress of Solitude (2003), and the 1970s Brooklyn boyhood of two friends, the white Dylan and the black Mingus—salt and
pepper, race and music, levitation and transparency. Just how resonant can a decade be? What if nothing else for the rest of your life will ever be as meaningful
as how you felt in the seventh grade, being beaten up on your way home from school? Play That Funky Music, White Boy. Is it possible to grow up at all,
much less up, up, and away, in a novel named for Superman's polar hideout, a hope chest and a memory bank with its own lab and its own zoo, where the Man
of Steel from Action Comics went whenever his nerves were frayed—a novel that is itself a nest of cellars and attics, of batcaves in which Dylan with his secret
identities may be downstairs practicing sarcasm as if it were karate, while his artist-father Abraham is upstairs painting jackets for sci-fi paperbacks and killing
time with blobs of light, even as Mingus's singer-father, Barrett Rude Junior, on the next block over has drawn the shade to darken the room where he burns
freebase cocaine in a glass pipe?

By now you have heard that nerdy Dylan's bohemian parents, avant-garde Abraham and radical hippie Rachel, move to Boerum Hill in Brooklyn just when the
neighborhood is deciding whether to decay some more or gentrify, because they believe in community. And they send Dylan to public school, rather than St.
Ann's or Packer, because their liberal principles say they should. And Dylan, naturally, is victimized, headlocked ("yoked") every day by black boys from the
projects, one of whom steals his bike, for which theft his sorry ass will then be kicked by earth-mother Rachel herself, earning Dylan an enemy for life. And he
will be naked before this enemy when his feckless parent, the Red Queen, "Rachel, the Symbionese soccer mom," suddenly deserts him, disappearing into the
sexual and social revolutions with a grown man as serious about comics as Dylan himself. She will never see her son again, although, signing herself "Running
Crab," she does send back the occasional, cryptic postcard. ("Brooklyn was simple compared to his mother.")

And then, miraculously, Dylan is befriended by supercool Mingus Rude, equally motherless but effortlessly gifted, the mulatto son of a celebrated soul singer:
"an exploding bomb of possibilities." As if they are characters in the comics they consume like oxygen, Mingus and Dylan transcend their streets. Games of
stickball and skully, movies starring the dead Bruce Lee, comics featuring a Human Torch, an Invisible Girl, and Mole Men, weed-smoking, break dancing,
Motown, hip-hop and funk, Yoo-hoo, Etch A Sketch, Spirograph, and Pixy Stix, all seem staged for these brave two, a private safari into the continent of being
boys. They will fly high over stoops and bodegas, the public school, the House of Detention, and the Brooklyn Bridge. At first the purpose of their upward
mobility is to tag walls that can't contain them, paint their names on every page in Brooklyn's book: "Under oblivious eyes, the invisible autographed the
world." Later, though, Dylan and Mingus turn into crime-stopping vigilantes. And we are asked to believe they actually fly. From a homeless superhero who
fell off a roof, they inherit a ring that lets them drape a cape and levitate.

A magic ring conferring the ability to fly would seem to belong more to one of Lethem's earlier novels than this masterly, lyrical scan of childhood, a ligature of
fellowship and blood ties. Before everything goes wrong about two thirds of the way through, Solitude has been perfectly poised between sense and stress,
aura and object, the man who remembers and the boy who was there. So saturated is its phrasing, so tactile with the first charged feeling of each sight, sound,
smell, and sinew, that it seems that popular culture might really be the solvent in which contradictions of class and race dissolve. Even after Dylan and Mingus
are discovered in a homoerotic scrum—as if they had been choreographed by the Freudian critic Leslie Fiedler in a Huck and Jim, or Ishmael and Queequeg,
or Natty Bumppo and Chingachgook pas de deux—when white Dylan goes off to Stuyvesant High School, Camden College in New England, Berkeley,
California, and a vile career in rock criticism, while black Mingus goes to crack cocaine and prison, both passages are, if perhaps perfunctory, nevertheless
plausible. But then that magic ring shows up again, behind bars, where instead of letting anybody fly away, it renders them invisible.

Only in a comic book, and not very often there, will a magic trick harmonize the races or bring back your missing mother. Solitude, copping out, didn't so
much cheat the reader as it threw up its hands and shrugged us off: I give up. Irony hasn't done the job, or nostalgia, either, so why not try wishful thinking? In
this, we seem not to have advanced an inch in at least four decades. Some may recall the essay Norman Podhoretz wrote for Commentary in 1963, "My
Negro Problem —And Ours." As Dylan was "yoked" in Brooklyn in the 1970s, so Podhoretz, in his very own version of "Play That Funky Music, White
Boy," reported "being repeatedly beaten up, robbed, and in general hated, terrorized, and humiliated" in Brooklyn in the 1930s. And as Podhoretz concluded
that America's race problem could only be solved by "miscegenation," by making color "disappear," so Lethem helpfully bequeaths Dylan an African-American
girlfriend in third-world Berkeley.

But Podhoretz is busy these days attacking ex-friends and invading Mesopotamia. And how come Berkeley in these pages seems so much more educational
than Bennington College? Lethem, who went to Bennington for a bit, calls it Camden in The Fortress of Solitude. So did Bret Easton Ellis call it Camden in
The Rules of Attraction, and Jill Eisenstadt, too, in her novel, Far Rockaway, where Ellis had a walk-on. But Donna Tartt called it Hampden, even though
The Secret History was dedicated to Ellis and some of us wondered about Tartt's student dope dealer with the mob connections. A dope deal likewise figures
in Dylan's stay at Camden. But unlike either Ellis or Tartt, Lethem failed to notice any incest, gang rape, or murder. And Bennington probably wonders if any
of these stoned, horny, ungrateful, and uncomprehending pissants ever went to class or read a book or had a thought or mustered a fierce feeling about
anything other than Devo or Marvel.

Which brings us full-circle back around to comic books and popular culture. I'm glad to learn from The Disappointment Artist that Lethem's father is more
interesting than Dylan's was; that his mother, unlike Dylan's, didn't abandon her boy out of narcissism; that Jonathan, unlike Dylan, has siblings. And I am
sorry that none of us can fly, besides which we're opaque. But it is time this gifted writer closed his comic books for good. Superpowers are not what magic
realism was about in Bulgakov, Kobo Abe, Salman Rushdie, or the Latin American flying carpets. That Michael Chabon and Paul Auster have gone graphic,
that one Jonathan, Lethem, writes on and on about John Ford, while another Jonathan, Franzen, writes on and on about "Peanuts," even as Rick Moody
confides to the Times Book Review that "comics are currently better at the sociology of the intimate gesture than literary fiction is," may just mean that the
slick magazines with the scratch and sniff ads for vodka and opium are willing to pay a bundle for bombast about ephemera.

But all of it makes me itch. Welcome to New Dork! We have been airpopped and multimediated unto inanity and pastiche. Philip K. Dick and Stan Lee get
made into Hollywood movies. Alienation and sexual terror have their own sitcoms, fashion statements, and marketing niches. The middle finger and the Bronx
cheer are required courses in cultural studies. Boomers have made sure that their every febrile enthusiasm since Pampers will last longer than radioactive waste,
on digital cable or DVD. Gen-Xers are just as solipsistic; anything that ever mattered to them must have been profound, even, say, Debbie Harry of the pop
group Blondie talking to MTV while a sirocco blows in one of her ears and out the other and neurons die like flies. BITE MY CRANK, SUPER GOAT
MAN!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 20 March 2005 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

"It's obvious, blatant, standardized, ... which is what pop culture does to our obscure and shameful yearnings" -

oh puh-leeze

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"DeLillo himself"

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

"DeLillo himself"

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

"DeLillo himself"??

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah i'm kinda surprised at the cranky tone, john leonard's hardly someone who kneejerk hates/dismisses pop culture, he's actually one of the better critics of it. i like fortress of solitude alot but it echoes my tastes, childhood, experiences too closely for me to really get a critical grasp on it; he's definitely not the first person to think the book falls apart in the last third and to get really annoyed at how it falls apart. he makes me want to read those earlier lethem.

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 20 March 2005 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i must admit i'd not heard of leonard before (and going just by that i'd probably have avoided him in future, bcz he is awful bad and wrong, in that) (in that he seems to be deliberately misreading a three-dimensional trope of lethem's as one-dimensional in order to then say "but look here is a SECOND dimension")

the earlier lethem is very much worth reading.

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

so is men and cartoons, for that matter, i found it in the library the other day and it brightened my lunchtime to no small extent.

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 20 March 2005 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

STERL WHAT R UR THOUGHTS???

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 20 March 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked the article -- it made me want to read letham more, so I shared it. I've only read As She Climbed.. myself and liked it fine.

I thought the conclusion of the article was fantastic tho! It captured something about the nu-comix-vogue of the past five years which feels like this very particularly zeitgeisty moment that not being a real comic person myself (tho I like reading ppl. talk about them lots) I don't quite grasp.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 21 March 2005 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah i'm not sure where the current wave of 'comix! not just for kids anymore!' comes from, in 86/87 it was clearly 'dark knight returns' (look batman reinvented - for adults even!), 'watchmen' (look superheroes as a whole reinvented - for adults even!), and 'maus' (this is clearly serious art!), new sections in the book store were created, neverminding the works themselves this was, or seemed to be, a new development. i guess you could point at recent graphic novels that might have prompted this current critical visibility - jimmy corrigan, blankets, persepolis being the biggest (in media exposure)(with persepolis working like a present day maus, only more 'topical' obv; i can remember looking at i think time's year end lists issue or the ny times notable books yearend list and wondering how the hell they left persepolis off their list of 'best graphic novels/comix' only to flip to just plain 'best books' and see it listed there) i can think of, maybe throw summer blonde, or even ghost world if you wanna go back far enough but none of these had anywhere near the impact - within the comix world or outside of it - that dkr, watchmen, or maus had back in 86/87. it's maybe movie driven - if movies can raise the visibility of spiderman or x-men to new heights you can imagine the impact it has on a ghost world or american splendor. maybe it's the chabon book (which leonard doesn't really mention), maybe it's from years of spiegelman repping at the new yorker, who knows. in any case i can't point to a single clear reason or trio of titles or new development that's led to this attention but at the same time i can verify it is definitely there - there was a few weeks in succession where the term 'graphic novel' figured in the punch line of a new yorker comic.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 21 March 2005 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)

filter-down effect of marvel and dc getting a lot better than they had been for a whole while?

(n.b. too young to know if this is actually true, here)

tom west (thomp), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

that one Jonathan, Lethem, writes on and on about John Ford, while another Jonathan, Franzen, writes on and on about "Peanuts"

does anyone else get these two guys mixed up?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 21 March 2005 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I was only vaguely aware there was two of them until now! I have to go reorder my thoughts over the last few years.

God, this'll be worse than Howard Hawkes/Howard Hughes...

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 21 March 2005 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

haha i thought i didn't until it mentioned franzen wrote about 'peanuts' and i realized i thought it was lethem.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 21 March 2005 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)

The New Yorker certainly likes to talk about both. I think the author of article seriously misread Dylan's relationship with his black girlfriend and his time at Berkeley in TFOS.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Monday, 21 March 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think there's much in the novel it doesn't misread |: and i don't even like the novel all that much

tom west (thomp), Monday, 21 March 2005 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

my friend ade wz told he should read the book bcz he'd "identify" with it, despite having not been born in the 70s: i can sort of see how this works, too - i think my point is that there's something about the specific cultural moment it takes, or rather the anthropological-archaeological aspect of the way it deals with that moment, which is v important and the uh nut of why i think the permanency-of-disposable culture bit in the article is wrong - i realise this paragraph doesn't actually explain anything, oh well.

actually one otm thing is the thing abt how that one bit coulda been choreographed by fiedler, or rather "Freudian critic Leslie Fiedler"

tom west (thomp), Monday, 21 March 2005 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

older comix zeitgeist was all "ooh.. look, comix have growed up" now its like "ooh.. look, today's male 20somethings HAVEN'T" and I know this is a terrible thing to drop on a board like this, but there's something about the degree of 20something comic readers/knowers in the world at large that feels v. of-the-moment. I think it's the spate of comic-based flix (starting with x-men one) that's set the stage and maybe there's some delayed timebomb reaction from a certain 80s cultural moment?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Boy, am I glad I'm thirty.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i've not read much of lethem, just a few articles here and there, so i can't comment on most of this essay. but this statement of leonard's -

That Michael Chabon and Paul Auster have gone graphic, that one Jonathan, Lethem, writes on and on about John Ford, while another Jonathan, Franzen, writes on and on about "Peanuts" ... may just mean that the slick magazines with the scratch and sniff ads for vodka and opium are willing to pay a bundle for bombast about ephemera.

is so bigoted, snobby and just plain STUPID that i can't imagine anyone but the most blinkered, reactionary dipshit taking it seriously. how the fuck is john ford, of all people, a maker of "ephemera"? because he made westerns?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

not to defend leonard but if "stands the test of time" is a v.flawed line of justification (which it is) then "ephemera" is no insult

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

boy, am i glad i'm nineteen -

tom west (thomp), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.