Wolf In The Fold (SPOILERS)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So who's the traitor in the Ultimates?

Currently I reckon a toss up between Cap and Natasha.

Vic Fluro, Saturday, 23 July 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

What a top series this is. Poor old Hawkeye.

I hope it's Cap but it's probably not.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 23 July 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

Natasha is Iron Man's girlf, right? I can only think it'd be her, as they can't possibly explain away anyone else.

And yes, it's really top, innit?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Saturday, 23 July 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

Whoever it is is obviously a total bastard - we were getting the sanitised version earlier in the Hank Pym scene. I don't know how Hank will react to this latest turn of events but probably will be too deep in to do much about it.

I doubt it's Tony. Cap would work as he is acting more and more bastardly, but it'd have to be the serum warping his brane or something. Natasha we know almost nothing about, plus she's a trained killer etc. Although since she's Russian, does the Pym speech still work?

Vic Fluro, Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

Gah, the next issue isn't out fer two freakin' months!

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

I thought we'd get hot traitor revelation action this month. Now I have to wait until September... I'll have forgotten about it by then what with all the other HUMUNGOUS REVELATIONS every week in comics, even in 2000AD! (see Rico getting the lower half of his face blown off while Guthrie is reduced to random body bits.)

Vic Fluro, Saturday, 23 July 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

Whoa! What is a Dredd without a chin?????

Maybe we need an OMNISPOILER thread to deal with the summer of revelations.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 24 July 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

Nobody would look at such a thread. Apologies for the chin spoiler - I'll keep it to Ultimates revelations only...

Vic Fluro, Sunday, 24 July 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)

It's almost certainly not Tony. I think Millar has intentionally set him and Thor up to be the actual good guys.

My feeling is that it's Black Widow - partially because she's the only logical option, her codename is kind of a giveaway, she's already shown herself to be sneaky and manipulative, she's obviously fucking with Tony's mind, and she probably killed Hawkeye cos she has been partners with him for a while before joining and he maybe knew too much.

I wish that it was Captain America though, and I think Millar is playing on that because he's made the character such a hateful asshole that every reader wants him to finally just be full-on evil. But they won't do that.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 24 July 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
So, we find out whodunnit on Sep 21, according to the previews. I think we should all put our money down and make a guess, and whoever wins on Sep 21 get's a no-prize!

Or something.

My guess: It's Hawkeye. And everything at the end of ish 7 was a ruse.
(But maybe not.)

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

By the way, did anyone know there's an Ultimates cartoon on DVD coming out? I mean, it'll be rubbish, of course, but it's... interesting.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Thursday, 25 August 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

My feeling is that it's Black Widow - partially because she's the only logical option, her codename is kind of a giveaway, she's already shown herself to be sneaky and manipulative

Doesn't this all just scream Red Herring? Besides, Natasha would hardly qualify as a traitor. A mole at best, and a big wet plop in place of a dramatic reveal.

Cap's a problem for the same reason. He's a dick, but unless it turns out there's some sort of tiresome Very Good Reason Why I Had To Etc Etc, there's no dramatic satisfaction to be had, just a Big Surprise.

For those who have seen the cover of the Big Reveal issue: I'll be disappointed if it's NOT a dodge.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 25 August 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

Well, one argument for Cap is that he's been planning on taking down Shield since day one since they represent a lot of what he hates about the current version of America.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 26 August 2005 00:43 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
And now we finally know, and quite frankly it seems like the least of their problems. Thoughts?

Vic Fluro (Vic Fluro), Friday, 9 December 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

Well, I was sorta happy to see I was right. I think Millar likes to hit people with the obvious stick when they are expecting the rod of cleverness.

Great issue, though I get a little annoyed with this kind of grand scale destruction of real places in superhero comics. But it worked, and it all makes sense, and the wait until the next issue will be annoying.

Can't believe he offed Jarvis, though!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 9 December 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)

I will bet any amount of money that Henry Pym is pivotal in saving the day. (Maybe along with Bruce Banner.)

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 9 December 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

I tip my hat.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 9 December 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

Matthew, did you, like FinderWolf, find the takeover of the USA and the destruction of the Statue of Liberty in this comic to be unsettling?

Flyboy (Flyboy), Saturday, 10 December 2005 01:53 (twenty years ago)

For all its flaws, I love the Ultimates. This issue read just like part of Millar's last Authority arc (with art from one of Hitch's Aiuthority arcs) - the villains triumph prior to the heroes fightback. But he does it particularly well. I am just dying to see Thor cut loose, Hawkeye get all homicidal etc.

And I didn't recognise who all those bad guys were Ultimate versions of - is that the Abomination?


David N (David N.), Saturday, 10 December 2005 02:13 (twenty years ago)

Unsettling --- that's too strong of a word. But I do have some problems with casually protraying massive destruction of well-known real-life places in fiction. I think that they maybe went a little over the top with it, honestly. If Ultimates was entirely self-contained, it would bother me less. In a lot of ways, it's just Millar and Hitch being irresponsible with shared continuity - you know, they might be leaving in three issues, but Bendis still has to write Spider-Man taking place in NYC, and the Fantastic Four and X-Men have to deal with this backdrop.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 10 December 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't have called it casual, that's basically all that happens in the issue.

How much of an effect has the Ultimates ever had on other Ultimate titles?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 10 December 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

God, this is really good, isn't it? I wonder why it works so well, when so much of Millar's other stuff descends into the usual turgid brashness -- he's even pulled off the introduction of slightly campy supervillains into the Ultimates' previously un-costumed world.

Personally I enjoy seeing the cities I live in get fictionally destroyed (Toronto getting nuked in Resident Evil 2 is a highlight) -- but I'm not sure what allegorical point MM's trying to making here -- unless (a) the point he's trying to make is completely garbled, or (b) the point is "Look! Exposions! Cool!", and being Millar, either or both are likely.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 12 December 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

I doubt the editors would let this wholesale destruction pass w/out keeping the other creative folk in the loop. And if there's any place where continuity issues aren't an issue, it's in the Ultiverse! (Having to juggle a total of only 4 regular books & a small smattering of mini-series definitely helps in that regard.)

Also, the baddies knocking over the Statue of Liberty = the Iraqi liberators knocking over the statue of Saddam!!!!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 December 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

Also, I'm kinda disappointed that Millar didn't actually follow through on the "Thor's not a god, he's just bonkers" thread he unspooled. But that is such a small complaint.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 December 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, there's the obvious iconic reference there, but to what end/point? He seems to be mixing visual metaphors (or I'm guessing the "point" will become clearer next ish).

(x-post)

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 12 December 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Also, I was gonna pose the question Chuck asked: how is Millar SO DAMN GOOD on The Ultimates?

Re: the villains @ the end - I assumed a fair number of them are Ultimate versions of the Soviet Super Soldiers, or some non-US supervillain coalition. I know Crimson Dymano is there. I'm thinking one of the guys in the huge non-Dymano suit is Radioactive Man, maybe? (Unless I'm confusing Dynamo w/ non-Dynamo.)

[x-post]

Yeah, I didn't think he was drawing any parallels, unless he's trying to illustrate what a super-powered comeuppance might look like.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 12 December 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)

I really like that he definitively made Thor a God! The "is he crazy?" thing was fine for a little while, but it'd be cheesy if they did it forever.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 12 December 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

I have to admit that I was completely WRONG on the Ultimates. Having dowloaded the entire first and second volume and then read it I now realize that it's great and that it's almoust free of millarisims(or whatever you want to call them).

The ending of the first volume is kinda "meh" and it has the Hulk in that awful version Millar likes to write, but the second volume is REALLY REALLY GOOD. More character development, more plot twists, more backstabbery, great.

Now I wanna know how they get out of this.

And I love that Thor is a real god. It makes him right and It's probably the character (along with Tony) that I like the most. I hope that Hank Pym is, like Matthew said, important in saving the day. His redemption is long overdue (and Millar seems to like him).

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 19 December 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)

Well, it'd be sloppy writing for Millar to drop Pym into the first and second act without doing anything with him, especially after that bit with him talking to the mysterious "traitor" in the sixth issue.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 19 December 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

Well, yeah, but he could turn into a real traitor and sink even lower. And I really like Pym and want him back on his feet.

Amadeo (Amadeo G.), Monday, 19 December 2005 13:26 (twenty years ago)

I had assumed that the traitor Pym was talking to was Natasha. I believe something about him was mentioned by one of the bad guys who had just finished handing the Ultimates collective asses to them in such spectacular style (It may even have been Loki himself)

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Monday, 19 December 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

I think he was talking to either Tony or Captain America.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 19 December 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.