Aeon Flux wish list

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Does anybody have any particular 'wishes' for when Aeon comes back?

I really hope Drew Neumann does the music, I miss that fabulous theme of Aeon's.

Barb e (Barb e), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

My hope is that Peter is able to command more control over the final product. I rather expect this new batch of episodes to have a different look and feel, yet still retain the Aeon vibe we all love. A decade plus has gone by so surely new episodes will reflect where Peter is *at* presently in his life.

A fresh new chapter lies ahead, will Aeon be older? Overall technology has improved as evidenced by the DVD boxset enhancements, so I imagine Peter and co. will take advantage of new avenues enabling them to continue to tell interesting stories in novel ways. Matriculated is a good example of whats to come, and that's 3 years old now.

Peter's mentioned several times his concern about the varying consistancy in the way Aeon and other characters are drawn, so perhaps partnerships have formed meanwhile that will ensure a more accurate visual representation.

I've been watching the DVD, absorbing each episode like I could never do before (I'm still embarrassed that I forgot that Una is definitely NOT Aeon's sister in the series), and somehow I feel the new episodes will not be like the old ones.

So much has changed since Aeon first came out. Beavis and Butthead first gained noteriety around the same time, and what is acceptable and/or shocking has shifted quite a bit since then.

I'm quite psyched to see new Aeon enter the world mind, and place total trust in the artist who brought her to us!

Roy N (eta carinae), Tuesday, 14 March 2006 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

I hope Mark Mars writes at least a couple of the episodes.

And Barb, I'm totally with you on hearing Drew Newman's music again.

Anthony Hudson (fabhappyfruit), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 00:35 (nineteen years ago)

personally.... I'm just glad he's able to do it. I've heard some horror stories about animation and rights and legal stuff (Invader Zim anyone...).

Maybe redue the demiurge so it fits his vision. Keep it off tv and let it go straight to video he doesnt have to worry as much about the content restrictions. Stay far far away from MTV...

ChristopherMichael (The Rictus), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)

That all the voices come back.

Denise and John together again!

skye, Wednesday, 15 March 2006 01:41 (nineteen years ago)

I think it would be cool if Peter did a voice. Mark Mars did a voice as one of those three guys employed ala Trevor in End Sinister.

Barb e (Barb e), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 04:16 (nineteen years ago)


It will not be a series of 22 minute episodes like the previous 10.

Peter Chung, Wednesday, 15 March 2006 05:12 (nineteen years ago)

That sounds great, Peter... I'd love to see Aeon in a longer format, finally. (Or are you implying they may be shorter? I suppose I'd like that, too. I think you do wonders with thirty seconds.)

Of course, I hope all the originals are there... Denise and John and Mark and Drew. I also hope the overall visual quality increases (the CG touches would be great), but above all I hope the stories stay strong. I suppose my worst fear is that MTV would require the setting to jive with what they put on the big screen, which could really fuck things up.

And secretly, I hope you get to make an episode that takes what they did with the movie and makes a big farce of it. I finally saw that shit here in Tokyo, and even though I expected the worst, I got worse. The least I was hoping for was some good direction to take my mind off of bad writing but I didn't even get that. Peter, write an episode that has Trevor trying make Aeon his first lady... asking for her hand in marriage and a shot at her uterus. I'd love to see what the real Aeon would do.

Matt Rebholz (Matt Rebholz), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 05:24 (nineteen years ago)

I hope it doesn't air on mtv.

Let's face it, mtv animation over the past 6 or 7 years has had a life time of three or four episodes. Even their long running series couldn't last. I can't imagine how a new aeon could survive on mtv myself. Where are they going to stick it, between one marathon of the gauntlet and another marathon of the real world?
13 year olds watch mtv for their favorite stars and adults watch it as soft core porn, what place does aeon have in that? No, one show can't change a network audience. It does make me wonder what kind of plans they could have for it. Maybe rent it out to cartoon network like the WB and FOX have been doing. Or comedy central like where MTV sent those two animated shows about college kids. One was actually pretty good.
My second guess, is that their going to copy the success of adult swim and try to produce their own late night animation block. That idea intrigues me. MTV does have the potential of good things, I've seen it, maybe they can bring an Aeon/the maxx/the head amout of intrigue to the large masses of preteen whores.
Swwwweeeeeeeeet.

Joshua Aldridge, Wednesday, 15 March 2006 06:47 (nineteen years ago)

what would another mtv animation block do? limit it more? Maybe adult swim itself could pick it up (like they did with family guy), maybe it would be a good way to have adult swim live up to it's name (between Inuyasha and Aqua Teen Hunger Force I think it's safe to say it should be called young teen swim). But still it might be a better choice.

ChristopherMichael (The Rictus), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 09:13 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, I could definitely see Aeon on Adult Swim. I can't believe it isn't already on there, replaying old episodes. That would be great!

Anthony Hudson (fabhappyfruit), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Flux on Adult Swim'd be pretty great, but since their taste in non-comedy shows is 90% crap I doubt they'd ever really show it. Almost the entire Action Block is totally one-dimensional -- the only exceptions I can think of right away are FLCL, Eva, and that one episode of Cowboy Bebop with that floating fat guy (well that was dumbed-down too but the subject matter just weird enough to be interesting, what with the mind-altering experiments and such). However, if another channel was going to pick up the re-runs, it'd most likely be Cartoon Network.

What I wish is that the new episodes be on a channel I get, and that they be just as good as the old ones, with new bizarre and wonderful characters, creatures, robots and gadgets, sex and psychology, Drew Neumann, and a brand-new opening title sequence. And that the higher-ups don't cut out any of the naughty bits (ouch!).

your hair is good to eat, Thursday, 16 March 2006 06:12 (nineteen years ago)

I want to see Aeon Flux eat Aqua Teen Hunger Force
http://image.idea-bot.com/i/H.jpg

david leench, Thursday, 16 March 2006 06:34 (nineteen years ago)

lol @ david

they DO use old cartoon characters on some of the other shows... could use Ms. Flux on the Brak show or Space Ghost?

ChristopherMichael (The Rictus), Thursday, 16 March 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

errr the last post was just a really stupid joke about the above one... I actually would not want to see that

ChristopherMichael (The Rictus), Thursday, 16 March 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

As long as we're wishing for improbable things anyone want to see David Bowie in there somewhere, a voiceover for some character? Something worthy of the Flux universe, the Chairman of Monica or something, although Monica being an anarchy I suppose has no Chairman.

But beyond the wishes I do wonder how they come up with the ideas for those scripts. What approach they will take, because whatever it is, I know it will surprise me, but not entirely. I'll recognize it as some subject I've considered on some other level, and that's what I'm really wishing to see. Something that will take me to another level as that series always did. I just feel positive about that.

I only hope the writers don't come here and feel frustrated because they're working on some other direction entirely. Wishes are just wishes and not necessarily good ideas, lol.

Barb e (Barb e), Friday, 17 March 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

Oh man, i'd take a David Bowie voiced character in a heartbeat.

And Drew Newman's music really is so much of the series to me, I'd want him back for sure. I think as long as you get that crowd of people into a room together, they're going to produce some solid gold entertainment. I know Peter probably had his share of headbutting with the other writers and directors, I really dug Japhet Asher's and Peter Gaffney's take on things.

Hell, just the idea of a new Aeon series feels like a granted wish for me!

skye, Saturday, 18 March 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

David Bowie LOOKS like he could have come from Monica. That'd be definitely interesting to see what voice talent they could get, assuming that the characters still talk (oh god, I hope so).

Anthony Hudson (fabhappyfruit), Saturday, 18 March 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

I wonder what's happening on the Luvula front.

Joshua Aldridge, Saturday, 18 March 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)

Alien Zombie Bowie vs Aeon:
http://image.idea-bot.com/i/J.jpg

david leench, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 08:15 (nineteen years ago)

The thing about people like Aeon and Trevor is, that they misunderstand each other (or think that they might). So, when they are forced to investigate their own prejudices (which, according to people like themselves, they either do not have, aren't actually prejudices, or do not matter anyway to them). Since it is their job/mission/need in life to know (for Goodchild) their subject/object or (for Flux) their enemy/friend.

And whom more-available, appropriate, or more-appealing to measure their respective (mutually-exclusive or otherwise) "dispositions" against than one-another: for people like them, like either of them, it's really where the rubber meets the road. And it is much out of a mutual recognition of what the alternative of avoiding the other (and therefore the very opportunity to prove anything meaningful to either of them) would have to amount to. The moot impunity of cowardice before either or both of their own insufferable lights!

Mark Mars, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

What if the race of consciences, the Custodians, were to have prevailed. At some point, of course, a certain saturation point would be reached. Given the viability of the Custodian species - at least, within the growth-medium of the Breen human population, that is, no matter what might be the determinant criteria of "saturation." For example, the minimum percentage of the host-population (Breen humanity) would be dramatically lower than 100% if we were just talking about, say, meaning to sustain a minimum, quarantined population of Custodians sufficient only to sustain and regenerate themselves indefinitely. Your more-likely, big-budget projects will demand a greater penetration.

And anyhow, a proper, pure eugenics should only consider the question of whose-demise-versus-whose, in the case of the Custodians vis-a-vis their human hosts, with a pure equanimity: though the Custodian's conscience is artificial, it's is still a conscience, nonetheless - and, as such, requires that we equivocate completely when we consider whether it matters or what it means to, in effect, supplant and to obliterate what were formerly only native human conscience via the introduction of the Custodian species in the first place. Perhaps Trevor Goodchild had something else in mind besides creating the Custodians as for the benefit of Man. Perhaps it were the other way around.

Mark Mars, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)


Hmmm, but what would be the benefit of maintaining a parasitic race like that? If this were true then you could only reason that Trevor was driving toward an eventual goal outside of his consistent motive of creating a final Utopia, because sustaining the Custodians just wouldn't be an end in itself. I suppose perhaps they could eventually have enough individual reason to treat the human body as an instrument, rather then the human using it as the substitute of a supposed "malfunctioning" component, but would a mere conscience actually be an entity? I mean, it's essentially a "checks and balance" tool to keep you adherent to your personal morals, in the show's case Trevor's particular morals, and wouldn't have the capacity for the functionality to sustain itself, or even effect it's surroundings in any way. I wouldn't think

You could, on the other hand, claim that it has the ability to learn without the ability to break it's inherent code. Like say a human was born with the genetics of socialization according to one mans standards, and was unable to break them, but instead developed a working personality around and in-between those bindings. Story wise, this could be done with the first child of two custodian possessed parents, provided the custodian were able to imprint on genetics. It makes you wonder how a mind would develop without the capability of breaking the slightest, or stupidest, of rules. Isn't that how were able to form an identity? I mean, look at Aeon, who appears to have a perfect grasp on who she is as a person, and she does so by not working within anyone else’s frame work, or at least being consciously aware of the frame works she‘s in.
Anyways. INTERESTING!!!

Joshua Aldridge, Wednesday, 22 March 2006 23:03 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
Barb! Thanks for spelling my name right! And thanks for the
kind words--I am watching developments as much as you
guys are. Fingers crossed, here's hoping....

Taa, da da dada, dada.... (Aeon's theme.)

Drew Neumann, Monday, 24 April 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

I would like to see something with minimal dialouge. I really liked the silent shorts. It was so mysterious and dream-like when they never spoke to explain anything, you had to really follow the action to figure out what was happening. I would like to see something inbetween the intensity of the silent shorts and the more intricate plotting and storylines of the half-hour episodes. I think matriculation was like this. There was dialouge in the begining, but just enough to set the scene. Then the rest of the story explained itself just through the visuals and sound effects. I expecially love the ending of that one :) If it were a long form video, there could be spoken passages were the plot would be advanced and scenes set, and action passages that would be concentrated and without words like the shorts. I am also especially fond of the more surreal aspects of the series like the Purge. I hope Peter would bring that to a future Aeon project.

Chas, Friday, 28 April 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

Drew, I got a kick out of 'reading' Aeon's theme, by her creator. I can 'hear' it. Lol!

Chas, dreamlike. yeah, that's the right word. I wonder if in dreams we linger long on visual aspects of a situation and not the verbal world we're all so immersed in everyday. I still think of a passage in one of Carlos Castaneda's books where he is explained by one of the wizards that the worlds reality is described to us by our constant inner dialog and to get past that to another level of reality we have to learn to shut off the inner dialog and think within the spaces devoid of words.

But then again look how many words I've used to convey thatthought, whereas one segment of animation going what, maybe 3 minutes without dialog will do the same.

The question is, I suppose it takes writers to come up with worldless scripts?

Barb e (Barb e), Friday, 28 April 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

Chas, thanks for posting those comments. I agree with your wishes 100%. It's exactly the approach I've decided to take.

It's nice to get some appreciation for Matriculated-- there was so much negative reaction from people who didn't get it. People seem to either hate it or love it; I'll be very frank - consciously or not, fairly or not, someone's reaction to the film always gives me some insight into their personality. It's been heartening that fellow artists whose own work I admire have been (very) enthusiastic. On the other hand, viewers who said they preferred Dark Fury... well I hate to tell them that I don't consider that a compliment (but they already knew that).

Barb, I guess you mean "wordless". A character can stand still and talk with minimal animation and convey complex ideas through dialogue which would be extremely difficult to try to communicate visually. But I find that ideas conveyed verbally reach our brains in a more overt, conscious manner. Using language is an acquired skill, honed by culture, history and institutions. I'm a visual artist first and foremost. By that I mean that I resist the notion that concepts need be inextricably tied to words which have been invented to signify them.

Viewers who think that films without dialogue can't have anything to say are like listeners who think a piece of music's meaning is contained in the lyrics.

Peter Chung, Friday, 28 April 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

Hello Peter, I am very excited that we might see you do Aeon again. Even though she is almost exclusivley refered to as a cult icon, the demand and appreciation for the series seems to be widespread (just try getting one of those porcelain statues these days, jeesh!).

Reading the above post, I'm struck by how intelligent and creative you are. Not just visually, but also with your words.
And specifically your ideas.
I had to read the above post about 3 times to take it all in :)

Of course I always knew that you would be a smart guy. Aeon was an unusually smart show, besides the immediate sexyness of it. But the former may have been what actually made it even sexier.
Right now I'm reminded how smart the show always was, even before they ever spoke a word.

Thank you for your response, and my fingers are crossed for a successful new Aeon.

Chas, Friday, 28 April 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

Rereading my post, I suppose it could be argued that the usage of words enables the formulation of concepts in the first place. Logic, at its most basic level, is indistinguishable from semantics. In this way, language is a necessary phase for the development of reason and organized thought. Language to me, is like the scaffolding or training wheels for establishing mental skills, but which the mind may eventually discard to pursue alternate forms of understanding the world.

Peter Chung, Saturday, 29 April 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

If anyone's interested in this subject, I recommend any of Steven Pinker's books, especially "The Language Instinct" and "The Blank Slate". He rejects the idea that words create thought, or as a result, that any human language is inherently different from any other. These ideas tend to go counter to the concepts we were brought up with in this generation -- that reality is a social construction, or that language is reality. (If I'm not mistaken, these are also concepts that "Aeon Flux" is deeply rooted in.) I was always a proponent of these ideas myself, and actually thought they were really cool, but I was strangely, quickly derailed and cornered into thinking otherwise by reading this guy's books. Either I'm a pushover, or this guy is really good (probably a combination of both).

So with that in mind, I'd argue that logic is completely separate from semantics, and that language has nothing to do with organized thought or reason. After all, people brought up without any language lose that function of their brain, but are no less intelligent per se. But I do think that language can loop back onto things like logic and reason, and make distinguishing them pretty difficult.

So I'd argue that it's the mental skills that we start out with, not language. Language is like a tower we ascend as we grow, but it can be hard to climb back down to those wordless levels of pure thought, especially if you're afraid of heights.

Matt Rebholz (Matt Rebholz), Saturday, 29 April 2006 05:10 (nineteen years ago)

By the way, I have to say this is the coolest forum thread yet. We've got Peter, Mark, Drew, revelations on the new Aeon, cool cartoon parodies, and philosophy. But I guess that's all pretty typical around here...

Matt Rebholz (Matt Rebholz), Saturday, 29 April 2006 05:13 (nineteen years ago)

"Word Play: what happens when people talk".

Has a lot to say about the fundamentals of language.

Impressions of the book later, after I've reread it.

Syra (Syra), Saturday, 29 April 2006 06:31 (nineteen years ago)

http://meaningoflife.tv/video.php?speaker=pinker&topic=complete

The first and last ten minutes of this interview touch on the inherent capacity of the mind to reason (in this talk, that is mostly framed in terms of moral calculation). I'd like to believe in Pinker's thesis, but it would seem impossible to prove, in that the only real life example we have of highly organized thought is our own, which is driven by and expressed in language. OK, I'll have to read his books now.

(I find that discussion very relevant to the thought experiment of Matriculated, where the robot runner is in fact, an intelligent, sentient mind built on a different model from our own. Its brain reasons on the basis of numbers-- which is an idea I'd originally wished to include, but which would have been even more inaccessible than the visual-symbolic dream "language" I devised for the VR sequence. Also, the Krellian accelerated-evolution brain-boost in Forbidden Planet is something I'd always wanted to see actually portrayed from the subject's point of view. The selfish vs. altruistic agenda of the humans in assisting the robot's mind-expansion also fits nicely into Pinker's discussion of evolutionary psychology. By the way, I'm revisiting these themes as I develop my Terminator episode.)

As my two opposing viewpoints stated in the above posts suggest, I'm ambivalent about language's role in shaping thought. I know that I'm able to observe events and understand them instinctively, yet I'll admit that my childhood acquisition of language has provided me with the tools to organize my understanding in complex ways that would be unimaginable without words. At the same time, those very words become a trap when they are regarded as possessing any truth in themselves, rather than as mere indicators of something real beyond abstract symbols. In the same way that the flag is sacred only to those who have chosen to invest it with value beyond its woven strands of colored thread.

Matt, you're right that AF is rooted in the view that society and morality are artificial structures invented and exploited by political forces. (This is contrary to the "eternal struggle between the cosmic forces of good and evil" paradigm that is the basis of so much popular mythology--and I'm sorry to the older regulars here who have to keep seeing me harp on this beaten-to-death point.)

Peter Chung, Saturday, 29 April 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

Has anyone here heard that its supposed to be a logical fallacy that a sentient being could ever become completely aware of itself? Kind of like (I think), a program that reads other programs not being able to read its own reading programme. How can you understand what you understand with? Is that like trying to use a tool on itself? Or like trying to use nothing but your eye's to see your eye's?

When considering the ideas that are being brought up here, this is the kind of thing I keep wondering about - limitations.

Sam Grayson, Sunday, 30 April 2006 08:51 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.