― Special Agent Dale Koopa (orion), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Special Agent Dale Koopa (orion), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:34 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 16:43 (nineteen years ago)
― terry lennox. (gareth), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
as n goes to infinity... what happens?
i'm not really sure... i'm still otming.
thrusting rockism into every conversation: just as silly.
carving out a seat in rock talk land only to find it not a very pleasant actually: uncool.
asking "what should i do with myself now?" until i'm dead: reality. m.
― msp (mspa), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
― msp (mspa), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
that wasn't what i was saying, scott.
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:02 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:07 (nineteen years ago)
― jeanne (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Igor Adkins (Grodd), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:52 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, Momus.
― Dan (Har Har) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:58 (nineteen years ago)
I don't know that I agree. Are you talking about Perpetua?
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:03 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:37 (nineteen years ago)
― rush, push, cash (FE7), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― amon (eman), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― msp (mspa), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 19:55 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 20:17 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 20:20 (nineteen years ago)
― bb (bbrz), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 20:46 (nineteen years ago)
yea, i can see ilms popists ignoring that aspect, but i cant really see any popular music as swill, i dunno, industry/economics or no, the music of the charts of a place does tell a lot about a place i think.
ha, we've had this discussion before, haven't we?
― terry lennox. (gareth), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
So, Joel, how often do you think this occurs, really? Because if the people making, say, a Kelly Clarkson album all just happen to be into that kind of music, then I don't see why the political/economic issues you bring up SHOULD enter the debate.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:57 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
I'm still not sure HOW it would, though.
"the whole classic/dud thing is soooo lame"
It's just a context for talking about whether you like something or not, really.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:45 (nineteen years ago)
true but despite ANYTHING being brought up, i still think it's a kinda limited way to think about music. it's not a competition.
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:52 (nineteen years ago)
As far as the music itself is concerned, the only thing worthy of criticism from a political perspective is the situation where someone is not making music that they just happen to like, but deliberately trying to make something that will sell.
aesthetics, marketing, etc., etc. - these are all "political." even the musical is political.
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 3 November 2005 00:02 (nineteen years ago)
If I talk about how much I like Kelly Clarkson, I don't think I need to examine the market forces that bring her to my attention while another would-be pop star gets left behind. I mean, I'm aware of those sorts of machinations, but they don't do anything to change my opinion that "Since U Been Gone" is a killer song.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 November 2005 00:04 (nineteen years ago)
and as jaync says, im not sure how this implicates popist viewpoints necessarily. i do think theres value in engaging with everything that becomes popular, because its obviously had succesful resonance, it becomes part of the cultural fabric at that given time, and hence is 'important' (not necessarily on an aesthetic level, but thats another kettle of fish now).
but i think popism isnt really about this anyway. i think popism is harder to define than rockism (and look at the trouble we've all had agreeing on what rockism actually is), partly because i dont think its possible to exist (yes i know i said i was one upthread ha). but i guess we could go for it being to do with the 'now' and unconcerned with history/context? it is what it is?
but this doesnt necessarily priviledge pop/chart above other music, just as rockism doesnt inherently priviledge rock/indie music above other music. which is why a lot of ilms 'popists', are just rockists about pop!
which is where, i guess, tangentially, we come back to ians point. does discussing music inherently lead you down a path away from this visceral, for the moment aesthetism?
i still dont think it does, but i can see the argument there, for sure
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:12 (nineteen years ago)
the industry/economics thing is interesting, because while on the surface it could be seen as quite rockist, or anti-popswill, its also the opposite. after all, it was the same industry that made the byrds sell x amount of records. is kelly popular because her music is good, or because the industry pushed it? are the byrds enduring because their music was good or because the industry pushed it, and continues to push it (obv in different and more subtle ways today, but its an ongoing self-perpetuating process)
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:22 (nineteen years ago)
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Igor Adkins (Grodd), Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Igor Adkins (Grodd), Thursday, 3 November 2005 10:03 (nineteen years ago)
― terry lennox. (gareth), Thursday, 3 November 2005 10:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Thursday, 3 November 2005 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
"Rock & Roll Is Here To Pay" by Steve Chapple & Reebee Garofolo is an analysis of the music business through the mid 70s that addresses many of the issues you raised re: the effects of economics on music. It's an academic study and though lefty-oriented remarakably free of pomo jargon etc (written in the mid 70s). a modern-day version of this book is what you're pining for (me too).
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0882293958/002-7213165-8971268?v=glance&n=283155&s=books&v=glance
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 3 November 2005 13:43 (nineteen years ago)
one of my professors!
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Friday, 4 November 2005 03:49 (nineteen years ago)
Customers interested in this title may also be interested in:What's this? ( What's this? ) Feedback
* Papers on Cultural Anthropology for Sale Hundreds of anthropology-related papers, articles and essays designed to assist university students writing and researching their own.www.the-paper-store.com
* Sea Pearls, Alternative Natural Tampons Healthy, Environmental, Economical, Comfortable and Convenient. For your reproductive health and comfort, for the planet, for a change... Try Sea Pearls.www.seapearls.co.uk
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Friday, 4 November 2005 03:50 (nineteen years ago)