Maybe I'll draw a little I 'heart' New York on the inside of my thigh, just for you utterly useless New Yorkers - all 20 million of you, you rapist-and-pedophile tolerators.

I want some hard capital here.

Change, or the show goes on.

Hell, if it's off-limits for myspace or flickr, I can always post a 'taste' there and re-direct to Ripco, which is totally uncensored.

My page there is:

http://pages.ripco.net/~dymaxia

Come to think of it, that's ideal. And I'll post ALL of the links right here in this journal.

http://www.myspace.com/polishhooker

http://www.flickr.com/users/liveinreality

Tonight

"Tonight"

Tonight, Tonight, won't be just any night.

Tonight there will be no underwear.

Tonight, Tonight, you'll see my crack tonight.

Just for you, menstrual blood and pubic hair!

Tonight you'll get to see my anus -

New York you are so heinous,

And still you won't do right!

Oh moon burn bright,

please give these stalking thugs

Such a fright!

Tonight!"

Journal has been deleted. If you are raspberrywho, you have a period of 30 days to decide to undelete your journal.

HANOI, Vietnam

Authorities said Thursday they are searching for former British rock star Gary Glitter over his alleged relationship with a Vietnamese teenager.

"At present, relevant authorities Ba Ria Vung Tau province are trying to trace this gentleman, and clarify the relationship between this gentleman and a Vietnamese juvenile," Foreign Ministry spokesman Le Dung said.

The 61-year-old Glitter, who rose to fame with a glam rock act in the is perhaps most known for "Rock and Roll (Part 2)," which is still frequently played at sporting events.

Dung said authorities have conducted interviews with a 15-year-old girl who they found in the home rented by Glitter. The spokesman said Glitter, whose real name is Paul Francis Gadd, had applied for permanent resident status in Vietnam.

"If evidence of a (legal) violation is found against Mr. Paul Francis, and especially evidence of sexual child abuse, I believe that very strict legal measures will apply to him," he said.

In Vietnam, the crime of sexually abusing a child can lead to the death penalty.

Glitter was convicted in Britain in 1999 of possessing child pornography and served half of a four-month jail sentence before being released. He remains on Britain's sex offenders register.

He later went to Cambodia and was permanently expelled in 2002, though Cambodian officials did not specify his crime or file charges.

Glitter's other 1970s hit songs include "I'm the Leader of the Gang (I Am)" and "Do You Wanna Touch."

i mean, you just reproduce stuff of mine, but are apparently terrified of commenting too much. is articulation that difficult for you?

for example, what is the point in reproducing the comment above, if not 'intelligence gathering'. what is the purpose of quoting a blog, for that matter? don't you think it's a little odd to actively and routinely monitor someone you've never met? where I come from, it's a bit autistic and anti-social and weird.

of course, you won't answer, you'll just talk sideways to your 'brothers' by posting pictures that are really codes.

because i've been on ilx since early 2001 at the very least, and it was never intended for that. was a time when people understood concepts like 'engagement' and 'trying to see someone else's point of view.'

explain your beef with me, or retract your as yet unexplained intelligence gathering on me. it's more than a bit stalker-ish.

yes, i've changed my name. i have nothing to hide. i made a rational point in the above quote. if you're not a bunch of clams, you sure act like them in the way you 'ferret' out people's new e-mail id's as if to imply we think we're getting away with something. we're not. these tactics were used for years on usenet - how long before you people start adapting and developing some new ones?

The word you are looking for is "stoned".

you just have all of your little private jokes but you don't really engage. [...] i've been on ilx since early 2001 at the very least, and it was never intended for that.

Have you missed all the Ally/Tom/Dan/Ned/Jess/Nicole/Blount/Trife pally pseudolol threads with 500+ crappy one-liners that were around in 2003/04? ILX has always been like this!

i mean, you just reproduce stuff of mine, but are apparently terrified of commenting too much. is articulation that difficult for you?

for example, what is the point in reproducing the comment above, if not 'intelligence gathering'. what is the purpose of quoting a blog, for that matter? don't you think it's a little odd to actively and routinely monitor someone you've never met? where I come from, it's a bit autistic and anti-social and weird.

of course, you won't answer, you'll just talk sideways to your 'brothers' by posting pictures that are really codes.

-- whiteout (kee...), November 17th, 2005 7:25 PM. (bobnope) (link)

http://www.learningforallages.com/images/EI5200.jpg
http://www.boscovs.com/wcsstore/boscovs/images/store/product/images/38190826270036.jpg
http://www.stephaniegladden.com/images/cool/CScerealPostPink02.jpg

aka THE INTERNET

anyway, i haven't received a satisfactory answer, just more talking over and around me, so I'll rest my case.

more leprechaun dancing gifs, pls.

Stoned people take interest in funny things. Crazy people can be funny. You are crazy (or seem to be). That about sums up why people around here take an interest in your Livejournal. Pretty obvious, really.

i haven't had this much fun since that new edition of 12 triple cd-r double leopards!!!

What's up with the leprechauns?

It's because you're Irish. (I am like ~60% Irish.)

WHY. Can you argue rationally, or not? Or do you just condescendingly re-post shit from Wikipedia because you're too fucking dumb to use anything but Cliff Notes?

Let's see some of YOUR fine education put to use.

Fuck you, Jon - my family were Irish Republicans. You think that doesn't mean anything to some vindictive types, you're fucking ignorant. Again, stop acting as if you haven't lived my life and had a bunch of anti-Irish stereotypes thrown at you.

The least you heartless fuckers could do is say you feel bad or sorry about what happened to me. But you won't do that, because you've basically admitted here that you don't give a shit when people nearly die.

Demonstrate some humanity for the love of god. The sort of humanity that WAS here in 2001, 2002 etc.

Why look for humanity online?

Why do I keep repeating these things? Because you just arrogantly make claims, but don't logically explain anything.

Take your psychobabble bullshit and shove it up your ass. You don't know me. I'm feeling great, now that I see what an arrogant, inhumane asshole who laughs about murder is really all about.

Cutty, what relevance is my like or dislike of this board have anything to do with it? There is a thread here that references me out of context. I am obligated to respond. That has nothing to do with what I think of the noise board - I have no opinion on it. I just don't understand why people post trivial garbage when the subject matter is so serious. Seems to me to be indicative of someone with serious social adjustment problems. Again, because I wouldn't do that.

Book 'em!!

Unlike you, I do NOT take a cynical view of humanity, even if the deck is currently stacked to make humanity look as, well, 'un-humane' as possible. It is simply not within my experience to think that everyone online is a predatory shitbag. Writing online has more benefits than liabilities.

Yawn, you're still being trivial. Answer me definitively : do you feel nothing when someone claims they were the victim of an attempted murder - I mean, I say this as a long-standing member of this online community.

What does 'community' mean to YOU? Does it mean you have no responsibilities or obligations toward others in that community?

It doesn't to me.

I couldn't give a shit about the White Sox.

It's called being 'mature' and socially well-adjusted and well-raised and well-mannered and all of that.

Some stranger? No, not really. He could lie.

Does it mean you have no responsibilities or obligations toward others in that community?

Responsibilities or obligations towards people who I don't know, who are obviously crazy and who keep insulting me? Again, no.
xpost, ahaha "well-mannered"

-- whiteout (kee...) (webmail), November 18th, 2005 4:47 PM.

I dunno. I thought that a lot of your posts sounded an awful lot like you were trying to explain yourself. And even if you are trying to create some sort of record here, I don't know why it's necessary to repeat yourself so many times unless you're hoping for a new reaction. But like I said, as long as you're getting what you want out of this, carry on.

do you feel nothing when someone claims they were the victim of an attempted murder
Some stranger? No, not really. He could lie.

Fair enough, but I wouldn't parade my callousness about it, either.

Which brings me to the important point: how DOES one evaluate another's credibility or sincerity? Me, I look for the sincerity of expression, the painstaking thought, the attempts to understand...if someone demonstrates these things, then I myself feel obligated to give a shit. Or at least, I don't shrug off something as serious as attempted murder.

But the fact is, to the socially adept, there are ways to evaluate sincerity. I gave people more than enough material to demonstrate that I am thoughtful and that I think before I write or speak.

Regardless, what IS truly baffling is your persistence, Yawn, in taking an interest in things and then claiming you're NOT interested. If it didn't matter to you at all, you wouldn't persist. However, you are talking to me directly, and you are telling me that you see no reason to care whether someone tries to kill me or not. I think that speaks for itself.

Responsibilities or obligations towards people who I don't know, who are obviously crazy and who keep insulting me?

You trotted out the 'crazy' thing first. You keep repeating it. You ARE insulting, you deliberately ignore my points and your behavior is more than a mite suspicious. I never insulted you until you took the plunge - that is a FACT. Furthermore, I have indicated to you time and again that what is 'obvious' to you is not a universal truth.

Will you acknowledge the fact of subjectivity, or will that be yet another point of mine that is over your head? When YOU say someone is 'obviously crazy', you must recognize that this is your opinion. Why do you repeatedly fail to address that? Why do you have problems admitting that your opinions are a subjective matter?

I give up now, btw. Whiteout, the board is yours and all the chess pieces have your color.

Hmmmmm.....

>>>Laura, you know damn fucking well I have no intention >>>of 'changing minds', so quit playing fucking dumb. Read the above >>sentence.
-- whiteout (kee...) (webmail), November 18th, 2005 4:47 PM.

I dunno. I thought that a lot of your posts sounded an awful lot like you were trying to explain yourself.

No, I'm giving myself 'equal time'.

And even if you are trying to create some sort of record here, I don't know why it's necessary to repeat yourself so many times

It's called 'interrogation'. It helps me to understand where people are coming from. Do you really not recognize this? When did ILX go from being a board of high-SAT scorers to people with no sophisticated reasoning capability whatsoever?

It might be difficult... The market for fiction is really tough these days.

False claim. Cannot be supported. What is the purpose of making
claims you can't substantiate again?

I'm doing this to you in hopes that maybe some of you might
be able to recognize the debating standards of logic and critical thinking. Did you guys go to college (or even a decent high school) or not?

And to WHAT does this 'book deal' nonsense refer to? Did I say I wanted a 'book deal'? What is THIS shit about, I mean, since my daily work revolves around censorship and the book trade, it IS curious. But no, I didn't say I was angling for a 'book deal' and even if I did write a book, it wouldn't be about the things you people obsess upon, since it is apparent to those who really know me that my passions lie elsewhere.

INTUITION - what does THAT mean? What does that refer to?

Explain your little 'inside jokes'. This thread was started as an attack on me, or at least some sort of 'inquiry'. Please try to demonstrate some maturity and try to be relevant.

in·tu·i·tion
The act or faculty of knowing or sensing without the use of rational processes; immediate cognition. See Synonyms at reason.
Knowledge gained by the use of this faculty; a perceptive insight.
A sense of something not evident or deducible; an impression.

TRY IT SOMETIME. ALSO THIS:

e·mo·tion
n.
A mental state that arises spontaneously rather than through conscious effort and is often accompanied by physiological changes; a feeling: the emotions of joy, sorrow, reverence, hate, and love.
A state of mental agitation or disturbance: spoke unsteadily in a voice that betrayed his emotion. See Synonyms at feeling.
The part of the consciousness that involves feeling; sensibility: “The very essence of literature is the war between emotion and intellect” (Isaac Bashevis Singer).

False claim. Cannot be supported. What is the purpose of making
claims you can't substantiate again?

-- whiteout (kee...) (webmail)

Actually, this is very well substantiated.

Address me - why DO you play this 'game' on what should be a very serious thread?

A lie is a statement made by someone who believes or suspects it to be false, in the expectation that the hearers may believe it. Thus a true statement may be a lie if the speaker thinks it is false. Fictions, though false, are not lies. Depending on definitions, a lie can be a genuine falsehood or a selective truth, a lie by omission, or even the truth if the intention is to deceive or to cause an action not in the listener's interests. To lie is to tell a lie. ...

If that is you guys, I'm not afraid of you. You're already in a lot of trouble, and you just obsess on me to convince yourselves that you're not. Ain't that just like a dirty cop.

Then what DO you think if I'm not 'lying'? Listen you uneducated cop idiot, 'fiction' is deliberate, just like a lie. Quit weaselling, or as we educated folks call it, using sophistry.

When you imply I'm 'writing fiction', you imply I'm lying.

It stinks like cop, it's a fucking cop.

Well I'm sorry you're all getting busted for being dirty and all, but that was never my fault and you know it. Keep masturbating - it keeps you in the dark about how much fucking trouble you're in.

Yeah, dirty Chicago cops play these mind games. They've been playing them for years. They don't seem to realize we're not in a sixties or seventies police state anymore, but they keep playing the same old games.

I mean, slumming it on message boards. How low you pigs have fallen.

I know it's you, too, because I run into some of you 'following' me. What, do you think I'm fucking dumb? It's not my fault you underestimated my intelligence, or my inability to be intimidated by you.

Good night, Chicago terrorist pigs.

You're going down. But do keep masturbating, it serves us well.

It's not my fault you got in trouble with the feds, and you know it.

Who the fuck ELSE would go into my fucking apartment repeatedly?

You fucking rapists.

In the excepts of the Exegesis reworked into the "Tractates Crytptica Scriptura" that close the novel VALIS, Dick expresses the MIT computer scientist Edward Fredkin's view that the universe is composed of information. The world we experience is a hologram, "a hypostasis of information" that we, as nodes in the true Mind, process. "We hypostasize information into objects. Rearrangement of objects is change in the content of information. This is the language we have lost the ability to read." With this Adamic code scrambled, both ourselves and the world as we know it are "occluded," cut off from the brimming "Matrix" of cosmic information.

Instead, we are under the sway of the "Black Iron Prison," Dick's terms for the demiurgic worldly forces of political tyranny and oppressive social control. Rome is the eternal paragon of this "Empire," whose archetypal lineaments the feverish Dick recognized in the Nixon administration.

Demonstrating that prisons, mental institutions, schools, and military establishments all share similar organizations of space and time, Foucault argued that a "technology of power" was distributed throughout social space, enmeshing human subjects at every turn. Foucault argued that liberal social reforms are only cosmetic brush-ups of an underlying mechanism of control. As Dick put it, "The Empire never ended."

I would like to assert the possibility that the prison has always been under construction, and it gets closer to view as it nears completion.

While the current administration continues to play "The Grand Chessboard" under the Orwellian facade of peace through war and freedom through slavery, we must ask ourselves: to what end? While some have compared Bush's tactics to those of Adolf Hitler, others feverishly argue that this is necessary to protect America's self interests. The prison-builders have always strived to coerce the citizenry into sacrificing liberty for pseudo-security. As H.L. Mencken observed:

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

So now as we embark on a lifelong irrational "War against Terrorism", which comedian David Cross concluded is as feasible to win as a "War against Jealousy", and the CIA-ridden oil-soaked media monopoly continues to parrot the current Administration's macro-management of reality, some of the true prison-builders begin to emerge.

Prison-building with fear

We, as humans, are scared of the unknown. The media frenzy of kidnappings a few months back, which served as a well-timed distraction to events that were conveniently sidelined, also served the prison guards and their prerogative: subdermal microchips.

Shortly after 9-11, in the wake of irrational reactionism, Applied Digital Solutions, parent company of Verichip, went on a flurry of an advertising campaign, asking everyone the Simpson's tagline: "Won't somebody please think about the children?". Andy Rooney came out on 60 Minutes proclaiming; "I wouldn't mind having something planted permanently in my arm that would identify me.''

This market tactic was paired with their "Get Chipped!" promotion, and the "Chipmobile", which is touring Florida Senior centers, prowling for Alzheimers patients who must get chipped "for their own safety". Soon deals were made with China, Mexico, and South Korea to perpetuate the meme that global slavery equals global safety.

Just before the FDA ruled that Verichip is not a regulated medical device, Microsoft MapPoint announced a partnership with Verichip to "pinpoint the location of almost anything you want to track—in real time. You can even receive critical information about body temperature, pulse, and more." The FDA then charged: "ADS's conduct flagrantly disregards FDA's prior comprehensive advice."

Then in November the tune changed, from a medical device back to a location and tracking device, as a Washington forum debated the benefits and hazards posed by a new way of identifying people with a microchip implanted under their skin to replace conventional paper identification. Privacy advocates argued the microchip could spell the end of anonymity in the United States, particularly if authorities began requiring people to wear them to meet conditions of parole, employment or border crossings.

As the prison is beginning to emerge and the thoughts and nightmares of writers of the past are birthed into existence, we embark on a new millennium, a new day in America.

"This is not a dress rehearsal for the apocalypse. This is not a pseudo-millenium. This is the real thing folks. This is not a test. This is the last chance before things become so dissipated that there is no chance for cohesiveness." -Terence McKenna (1946-2000)

I would agree that at the time of this quote, we may have had a few more options. I believe that we have surpassed that now and there may be no turning back, no changing the direction of the ball once it has been thrown, and individually we must decide, Das Experiment-style, as Americans:

Do we want to be the prison guards, the prisoners, or do we want to find a way off of the island?

It's not a prison if you never try the door.

-------------------------------------
Visit Wade's fine website at http://www.libertythink.com. Wade can be reached at: valis@libertythink.com
-------------------------------------
Permission to reprint this article is granted providing the original author is cited and a link to PRISON PLANET.com is included. The views expressed in this article may not necessarily be those of Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson.
-------------------------------------
E-MAIL THIS LINK
Enter recipient's e-mail:

Philip K. Dick's Black Iron Subdermal Prison

By Wade Inganamort

As we slingshot into the 21st Century, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the governments and institutions that mold our minds have implemented a system from which we cannot escape. Are we really trapped in a prison with no doors or walls?

No, I am implying that you're nuts.