do i go to hell for pirating max/msp

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
y/n

JW (ex machina), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:18 (twenty years ago)

IF YOU DON'T USE IT, YES

Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:26 (twenty years ago)

that looks like fun

(n/a)

sleep (sleep), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:29 (twenty years ago)

ha i never got around to using my copy so trashed it.

nervous.gif (eman), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:47 (twenty years ago)

http://www.audiosynth.com/

nervous.gif (eman), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:52 (twenty years ago)

http://www.pya.cc/pyaimg/pimg.php?imgid=23982

shredding repis on the gnar gnar rad (chaki), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)

several personal friends of mine work / used to work for the company, and they work very very very hard

here are the names of the people you're fucking with:
http://www.cycling74.com/twiki/bin/view/Company/People

milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:02 (twenty years ago)

mr kit clayton works there doesnt he?!

shredding repis on the gnar gnar rad (chaki), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:10 (twenty years ago)

look what happened to Opcode.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:15 (twenty years ago)

Opcode is a sad, sad, sad story

I dunno, a company gets to 200-400 employees, that's one thing, but when you're talking about a company that basically employs about 12 people and some consultants, then it's dangerous to take the product for granted

sorry to lecture

milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:17 (twenty years ago)

>mr kit clayton works there doesnt he?!

& gold chains -- though I think that's just on occasion now -- not sure, he's still listed

milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:18 (twenty years ago)

I'M GOING TO PIRATE COPIES OF PROTOOLS

STRAIGHT FERN GULLY (jaxon), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:34 (twenty years ago)

did you download max/msp just because EYE uses it?

jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:35 (twenty years ago)

I was just joking that pirating killed Opcode = so don't do it. Personally, I hated Vision and was a Performer user at the time. I took a class in the old Max, did a bit of programming during college...most fun stuff was using a Roland PG-1000 as a control device.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:38 (twenty years ago)

opcode - lest we forget

oppenheim is the coolest fellow one could hope to meet

& of course it wasn't pirating that killed opcode, it was Gibson

milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:44 (twenty years ago)

(not saying anyone should have been using Vision by the late 90's, Digital Performer has been the pro choice for a decade)

milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 23:12 (twenty years ago)

way I always saw it was Performer was number 1 untill Studio Vision took the lead for a long time...I remember a time when most studios used Studio Vision and the only people who used Performer were bedroom types who'd used it for ages. Then a little thing called the MOTU 2408 came out. People flocked to what was essentially the first decent affordable multi-track interface for home computers, and MOTU was back on top.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 20 April 2006 00:52 (twenty years ago)

I haven't even pirated it. I use Pure Data. And I have been long before I knew Ey3 was using PD or MAX.

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 01:08 (twenty years ago)

you don't go to hell for pirating max/msp, you just tell the rest of us how you did it.

obviously, i also use pd.

lf (lfam), Thursday, 20 April 2006 05:24 (twenty years ago)

i just want everything to work. if i didn't have a life i'd use linux

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 05:26 (twenty years ago)

that said, i'm pretty pissed to hear (just as i was about to invest in a copy) that they aren't going to port it to an operating system that isn't based on trusted computing. i really think they need a new business model because this pace interlok dependent shit is soooo late 1990s.

lf (lfam), Thursday, 20 April 2006 05:28 (twenty years ago)

yeah jw, i just want everything to work, too. the life of pd-users is a hard one.

lf (lfam), Thursday, 20 April 2006 05:29 (twenty years ago)

I loooove Digital Performer but finally upgrading from 2.7 to 4.61 after years of living in the past is big motherfuckin' drag. . . .

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Thursday, 20 April 2006 05:56 (twenty years ago)

I LOVE SONIC FOUNDRY ACID

shredding repis on the gnar gnar rad (chaki), Thursday, 20 April 2006 07:42 (twenty years ago)

seriously is there any way to make music these days that doesn't involve a fucking apple laptop

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:01 (twenty years ago)

I used Performer 3.0 back in the day and have 4.something now and am re-learning a little bit. One GREAT thing is "consolidated windows". They had too many goddamn windows popping up here and there before.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:34 (twenty years ago)

I think Drew sold us out in a Bretton Woods-type conference in like 1996. xpost

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:43 (twenty years ago)

Has anyone here used Quartz Composer? I was thinking about controlling it with midi messages sent via PD.

Also, I use (via sending it notes on a channel every quarteer note) MidiPipe to generate midi clock for my external clocked hardware because PD is a PITA and doesn't support this!

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 12:46 (twenty years ago)

if I got a big enough monitor, one day I might consider paying for Ableton Live

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:50 (twenty years ago)

though frankly there is still an enormous and nigh-unbridgeable cognitive disconnect between me and the young people of the world who like to use knobs and sliders by clicking with a mousepad

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:51 (twenty years ago)

ableton live is awesome, but i can't be arsed to learn it

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:57 (twenty years ago)

seriously is there any way to make music these days that doesn't involve a fucking apple laptop?

yeah, it's called "spending untold thousands of dollars on instruments and amps and a p.a. and pedals that are all irreplaceable if stolen." it's sort of a stupid way to do things.

lf (lfam), Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:39 (twenty years ago)

Also, everyone who does this is a sentimental turd: see masonicboom

JW (ex machina), Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:41 (twenty years ago)

hahah

nervous.gif (eman), Friday, 21 April 2006 01:25 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.