BEATMATCHING 101

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
how?

jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Friday, 30 June 2006 11:59 (nineteen years ago)

jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Friday, 30 June 2006 11:59 (nineteen years ago)

Play one record.

in headphone, scratch other record on downbeat, or snare or whatever.

Let go of second record in time with the first record.

See if it's going faster or slower.

if it's a bit faster, drag on label/squeeze metal thing that record goes on/tap the side etc, while adjusting the pitch/tempo fader.

If it's slower, give it a little push, while adjusting the pitch fader.

Repeat till it's right.

It's easy, just takes some practice. The hard part is when the tempos are very close, listening close enough to notice whether the record is just a bit fast or a bit slow.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)

or when something doesn't count to four

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

sometimes it's the most fun to beatmatch shit in weird time signatures...and with real drummers who speed up and slow down, you have to stay on yr toes.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

when I learned I started out using two of the same record

just a straight 4/4 house beat

then you know they're at the same speed and you can practice getting em lined up

after you've got that down move on to stuff that's at different tempos ....

dmr (Renard), Friday, 30 June 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

that's a good idea

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Friday, 30 June 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

yes, after you've gotten used to starting the second record at the right time...randomly change the tempo of the first then beatmatch the second to it...actually harder then doing it with two different records because with two you can visualize in your head, ok, THAT beat is the one that is lagging, but when the record is the same it gets confusing.

Also, I have to admit for a while I was using those beatcounter devices, it helped give a shortcut to which was faster, which was slower.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 1 July 2006 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

it'd be cool to be able to put one record on each side of the cue

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Saturday, 1 July 2006 07:03 (nineteen years ago)

i made this thread in jest (because of the video) but I actually have to dj a wedding sun night in woodstock, ny. i am bringing the portable numark but i expect most of it will come off groom's powerbook.

dan, your points on blackcrack were good ones.

jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Saturday, 1 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

don't bother nah use just one turntable

alicer (alicereed), Saturday, 1 July 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

jon...lots of mixers let you put each record on different sides of the head, it's called split cue. Some people really prefer it, but it messes me up. I like the kind of cue where you can adjust the relative volume so you can hear a lot of the cue and a bit of the program in your headphones, it helps especially when there's a delay if you don't have a good monitor.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 1 July 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.