What is best Golliwog

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/cgo0065l.jpg

― Twisted Thinka, Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

Enid Blyton is the clear winner of all things racial and wrong
http://www.sterlingtimes.co.uk/golly_woggie_nigger.jpg

― ginweasel, Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

This is just wunnerful if we're on the topic of racialism.
http://www.blackpeopleloveus.com/

― ginweasel, Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

That blackpeopleloveus site is hilarious. Is that really Enid Blyton or is it a joke??

― dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 22:54 (nineteen years ago)

I went on that black people site years ago. They are jokes. I am sure the Enid Blyton thing is a joke am I right?

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 06:51 (nineteen years ago)

I can't see the Enid Bladclaat picyure for some reason, what is it of?

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 07:18 (nineteen years ago)

No it is real, the three gollies get around a bit too. They have other books where they go to tea and stuff.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 07:42 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah but Ich can't see it though. Is it 'Little Black Sambo' or something? I've got a really old copy of that somewhere!

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 07:47 (nineteen years ago)

For only £15 it could be yours: http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=299754130

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 07:52 (nineteen years ago)

It beggars belief although you do hear about Enid being quite un-PC. The best is when Big-Ears had to have his name changed in America to Grey-Beard because it was offensive to people with big ears. It's a wonder she got published at all in that case.

Hallo Wood!

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 07:58 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.thefileroom.org/documents/dyn/DisplayCase.cfm/id/846

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 08:00 (nineteen years ago)

I don't see what the problem is?

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 08:04 (nineteen years ago)

hang on one second, can someone just clarify for me if enid was a racialist or not? cos i've read loads of her books, and i was gonna let my kids read them too. this can't be true surely?

― clocko diko (honesttoafault), Thursday, 11 May 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

This is all too politically correct for me. I want to vote the BNP!

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:05 (nineteen years ago)

It's another world tho innit, no porters carrying peoples bags at stations now, nor gluttony that inolves food made out of wholesome ingredients, nor kids that just get a set of yummy lead soldiers for christmas, nor society where you can write about nigger golly and woggy without a bit of stick, I think they've changed the names in newer editions anyway. Your childs are safe, it's when they start demanding high teas and lashings of eclairs that you've got to worry.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

Yus Vote BNP and see magical change back to days of enid blyton with lashings of eclairs and all non nationals sent back where they bally well came from.
I personally am quite looking forward to being sent home to Scotland.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:14 (nineteen years ago)

i love how bnp got 26 new seats in the recent elections. and that most of them were in london. which isn't exactly known for its racism in the same way bradford, hull and leeds are.

plus only 36% of people voted.

i was going to vote. but then i got sidetracked doing something else. can't have been important cos i can't even remember. probably went to the pub.

― clocko diko (honesttoafault), Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:22 (nineteen years ago)

It are pretty scary. i voted lib dem because my wife told me to.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

I voted BNP because Jemmal my barber told me to.

the BNP "stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples" and is therefore committed to "restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948". To achieve this aim, the BNP advocates the use of "firm but voluntary incentives" to remove ethnic minorities from the UK. Membership of the party is restricted to "Indigenous Caucasians"

(Wikapedia definition)

― Teev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

I voted BNP because someone told me it stood for "Brand New Plot" and i'm kind of bored of my plot, so thought they might post me an upgrade....
Like with a built in laser pointer or a lock de-icer or something.

― sates, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.blink.org.uk/docs/leppart_gaunt.htm
breath taking

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 10:47 (nineteen years ago)

Bunch of Nonsense Party.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:15 (nineteen years ago)

and there's me thinking local elections didn't count.

The people who voted BNP are the same people who wave England flags at football matches and bang on about kicking every nations arse during the World Cup and how England's so great cos we beat those Germans at footie once upon a time and twice in a couple of wars. How ironic to think they're voting for exactly the same thing their ancestors fought against in those times of glory. Fucknuts.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)

That interview is jokes what a plonker

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:32 (nineteen years ago)

They are idiots. If BNP got their what the Captain would have to go back to Sri Lanka. We can't be having that!

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:33 (nineteen years ago)

Bloody Numpty Party.

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 11:46 (nineteen years ago)

Ok, so we've established that the BNP isn't the official Tea Drinkers party. Which one shall we asses next? What are our views on UKIP? (sp?)

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

Got about a quarter of the way through that interview but had to close the window before I got whipped up into a blind rage and smashed up the internets Captain-style.

Fuck a UKIP - bunch of tossars. If Labour went back to being a socialist party then that could be an option but it's not likely to happen, not even under Brown. Till then I'll dolefully go in and tick Lib Dems like some kind of gaylord. At least they seem like a nice bunch. Plus they're all a bunch of touchers aren't they?

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:20 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah but you have to vote Labour to keep the Torries out. It's a no-win situ'

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

Bobby Killroy dressed as a ghost!

http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/news/images/kilroysilk.jpg

― Teeven Killroy-Silk, Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:42 (nineteen years ago)

Robert Kilroy is a joke he doesn't like brown skinned people but now is not part of UKIP. Actually UKIP are a one policy party they aint good. I voted Lib Dems because I don't like Labour or Conservatives. DOH.

I like the Kilroy Pic the hat looks good on him

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

good for you quiche. actually what i don't understand is everyone i know (or who i know and bothered voting and i bothered asking) voted LD, including myself and both my parents and they STILL don't get nowhere. Proportional representation PLEASE!! Good point Tev re: Labour, but then you're stuck in almost a dictatorship. I didn't vote LD last general election out of a lack of confidence in the other parties so much as I generally agree on their views, other than the banning of smoking in bars.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

I don't reckon dem Lib Dems are gonna win any time soon though so if people change from Labour to them we'll just end up with the Tories running ING-ER-LAND!!!!

― Tev, Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:22 (nineteen years ago)

fuck that shit.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)

god i just imagined some kind of dystopian nightmare where the world is run by clones of B3n L1dg3tt and his Dad.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)

also, by voting lib dem = more seats in parliament for them, less for cuntos like the B|\|P.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

hey P.D. I thought you were for banning smoking in bars, you talked about when you were in Ireland and it seemed like a good idea. I dont want to breath in all the filthy smoke, but I still want to hang out with my mates, so looks like i'm still going to get lung cancer. I think banning it indoors in pubs is a good idea, either that or have forced air conditioning.

― sates, Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

it's a mixed thing for me really. the health-freak in me says yeh, go for it, it's filthy habit and people like i shouldn't be smoking ANYWHERE and yes in Ireland you got used to it quite quickly. The liberal-anarchist in me says fuck a smoking-ban, because at the end of the day the pub is pretty much the last refuge for smokers. In Ireland, if you wanted a fag you had to stand outside and so you'd get loads of people huddled together in the streets smoking while their mate guards the table and drinks. You never end up seeing each other, and as a non-smoker even you'd be annoyed with being given guard-duty.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

Nothing could ever be as bad as foul ole tony. I don't think Cameron's got much of a chance really, which is as it should be, but I don't like ming the merciless either. So I think I'm going to go back to my old fail safe method of who has the best beard in the local elections.

I'm all for not smoking in bars, i just think this is it a food is it not a food prevarication is nonsense.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

food, what?

what's wrong with poor old ming? i like him, he reminds me of some cheeky ex-headmaster type. he's pretty smart and has tons more charisma than cameron. god i can't believe cameron could be the next PM -I'm sick of weirdos like him and blair, I want a normal person in charge of the country instead of these plastic-faced goggle-eyed freakos.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)

personaly I'm still for it, and I think it might encourage some people to give up. Either that or they should be forced to have decent aircon.

― sates, Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

i don't think the enforcing of aircon is a good idea - pubs already have so many restrictions on them anyway (like the idiotic live music policies for instance) that making all pubs buy expensive air-conditioning units could break them. Pubs are places of sociality and vice and should be treated as such, although I do see why it can be annoying to have people breathe smoke in yr face. It hopefully will make people give up smoking but I don't think it'll have as big an effect as some might hope, seeing as there are still crowds of people gathered in the rain under pub shelters in Ireland.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

"Smoking will still be allowed in pubs which limit their food sales to snacks such as crisps, rather than prepared meals. "
Just means less pubs will serve food. baaad.

― ginweasel, Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

yeh, that's bull. either ban it or don't... i guess smoking pubs will get reputations for being really seedy. either that or there'll be an influx of big faceless O'Neill's pubs and rubbish little dives.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

I think proportional rep might mean BNP rule in some areas. That is scary??

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

Also I think it should be the pubs choice to ban smoking or not not the govts

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

yes.

hmm... not that i'd like them to get in or anything but proportional representation just seems fairer in general, seeing as first past the post basically gives us a two-party system. suckage.

― dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

True

― Captain Smash (Captain Smash), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

lol topics.

― the next grozart, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.