Royal Rumble

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm excited - it's my favourite event of the year. Triple H vs Randy Orton is uninspiring, and I'm not sure the JBL-Angle-Show triple threat will be any good, as triple threats so often aren't, but the Rumble is nearly always great. I am guessing that the star of the show might well be Batista, as he is the only one I can think of who has had big play building up to it. But if he wins, are they going to put him up against Triple H? After all the tension they've created between them, it would be odd not to.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 30 January 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)

haha i'm watching the rumble just now! omg what a great moment!! raw vs smackdown FITE!! and then mohammad hassan arrives and raw smackdown UNITE!! USA!! Gang up on the arab guy!!

genius!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 January 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

OMG SHOCKAH RESULT!! WHO'D HAVE THOUGHT?!??!?!?!?

ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 January 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

Great Rumble. I had a bit of a scare -- the satellite broke down at the bar where I usually watch PPV's, which led to a mass exodus to a different bar about ten minutes away. In a way, this was a good thing because I didn't know that the 2nd bar showed WWE PPV's, so now I have a solid backup plan/alternative for the future.

I heard they were planning to bring Pat Patterson back to help book the Rumble, but I can't confirm that. Anyway, it was brilliantly booked. It was like 2003 all over again, except booked properly. That is -- get the good workers in the match early on, give them all longevity pushes, and sacrifice them to the monsters at the end. The Luger/Bret ending was really well done, Cena can still credibly claim to deserve a title match at Mania, and we get the Batista/HHH match that everyone wants.

Orton got slapped back to the midcard where he belongs, the rumoured HBK/Angle match is clearly going to happen (yes!) at Mania, and the rumoured Snitsky & Heidi vs Taker & Kane match is also clearly going to happen at Mania, thus throwing all the useless dead weight into one match so that they don't drag down other matches.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 31 January 2005 04:45 (twenty years ago)

LOL AT VINCE MCMAHON SIDING HIMSELF

Alan Conceicao, Monday, 31 January 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

Angle vs Michaels, holy shit! I'd pay to watch that, if it were only possible.

My download of the Rumble is ONLY 1.4% COMPLETE.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)

recap for the ppv-less please?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 06:37 (twenty years ago)

Rumble Recap by J.D. Dunn

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)

where can you dl wwe torrents?

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

A lot of people use pwtorrents. I find it slow and unreliable, myself, but they've got GREAT stuff posted there 24/7.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)

I didn't find the big match as exciting as previous years, for some reason. I think the clearly calculated nature of it and the predictability of the final result made it seem a bit uninspired.

The Angle-HBK feud is a very promising one (last year's big Raw/Smackdown crossover match was the two musclemen's curtain call, and dismal).

The Raw since suggests they aren't shuffling Orton back down the card.

Ha, Taker & Kane vs two genuinely useless big lumps shows that the 'brothers' (though they seem to have stopped mentioning that of late) aren't so hopeless. A guaranteed whateverth win in a row for Taker at Wrestlemania, of course.

Much as I enjoy JBL when he is talking, I am very bored with him as champ in the ring. Gimmick match coming with the Big Show, and they are hinting at Batista going after JBL instead of HHH, so I think they are keeping him going for a while yet.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

that royal rumble match actually sounds pretty good.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

I think the clearly calculated nature of it and the predictability of the final result made it seem a bit uninspired.

Typically, there are only two guys who have a realistic shot of winning. Obviously, Cena and Big Dave were those guys this year. One of the things that made last year's Rumble so great was that four or five guys could have realistically been expected to win.

The trick to booking the Rumble is to make it seem random and unpredictable, even though it is the most meticulously booked match in the WWE. They'll set up unlikely yet plausible situations, but the key is in timing and the way those situations impact the match. Ax and Smash drawing #1/#2 and going at it to reinforce the "every man for himself" concept is a famous moment that everyone remembers fondly despite its obvious unlikeliness. Also, in 2000 you had Too Cool and Rikishi alone in the ring at one point, and they performed their dance routine smack in the middle of the Rumble (which was the most over thing in the WWF at the time). Highly unlikely but tremendously entertaining on its own merits but also because it didn't impact the match (if this had happened at the end of the match instead of near the beginning, it would have been a different story).

This year, we had the fantastic part about midway through when eight guys in the ring suddenly put aside their differences to split into Raw and Smackdown factions, only to put aside their differences AGAIN to gang up en masse on Mohammed Hassan (therefore reinforcing the xenophobia and racism toward the Hassan character :(, but we've already got threads about that). Again, it's an unlikely sequence, but not so implausible given the weeks of Raw vs Smackdown buildup for the Rumble, as well as the negative portrayal of the Hassan character.

On the other hand, I hate the way when they ordered the participants in a way that flagrantly telegraphs both the winner and the big stars, i.e. so many early Rumbles when there'd be mainly jobbers in there for 40 minutes, then you'd get more of the big stars in there, and then Hogan would come out around #26 and would be the obvious winner. See also one of the most infuriating Rumbles in recent memory -- 2003. It was a fantastic Rumble for the first 40 minutes as all the good workers were in there, with Jericho getting a great longevity push after weeks of buildup between him and Shawn about entering first and going all the way. Then they flushed it as Jericho got tossed in a totally lame manner by Test, the ring filled up with slugs, then Brock entered at #29 and was the obvious winner.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)

Sorry for the long rant and the somewhat shoddy grammar.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)

After Too Cool and Rikishi did their dance, didn't Rikishi then beat the crap out of them?

Agree that the 2004 Rumble was fantastic, even aside from Benoit winning, there were loads of good workers who all looked like contenders and the 'who can eliminate the incredibly fat man' thing was well done. Also it just seemed sort of well paced and plausible in a way that a lot of the earlier ones didn't, ie the eliminations were mostly quite imaginative rather than one two guys leaning on another guy halfway over the rope for five minutes at a time.

Still haven't seen this one, I think I might have the first two matches by now...

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 02:42 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Rikishi clotheslined them from behind and knocked them both out. IIRC, he threw out the next two or three people as they came, getting the ring to himself for a good portion of time as part of his full-scale Diesel push.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

is the fbi going to come to my house for dl'ing from pwtorrents?

I agree with the lack of surprise for the rumble. that was my main beef in the smackdown thread.. they mostly focused on their title match storyline, and didnt have any contender buildup for cena as far as I noticed from recaps and stuff. Yeah hes way over, but theres no storyline about him wanting it badly or a situation like batista was in, so that when they finally clashed at the end of the rumble, it would have been a big friggin deal. instead it was just 'oh how nice, its cena, perhaps he'll have a title match at mania, but he wont win' and voila, DAVE is the winner w/ a minor amount of controvery that will probably lead to a scenario with cena in a title match at wm21.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 05:54 (twenty years ago)

is the fbi going to come to my house for dl'ing from pwtorrents?
No moreso than they would show up if you d/l'ed any other movie or music torrents.

OTM about Cena ... they've been keeping him and JBL apart throughout the latter's title reign. Having a budding megastar like Cena be the guy to finally unseat your long-running heel champion at Mania is a storyline that kind of writes itself (assuming they actually follow through with it -- Vince has a major hard-on for JBL so I wouldn't count my chickens).

Still, the payoff is so much better when there's months of buildup behind it, no matter how subtle. I'm not expecting HHH-Batista to be that great of a match, but they've spent months building it up in spectacular fashion, it's the match that the fans clearly want to see, and Batista is Really Really Over as a result of all this. That stuff matters a lot more than the quality of the match (which will be fantastically booked to make it seem that much better of a contest).

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 06:39 (twenty years ago)

I'm wondering if they are hoping Cena gets better in the ring before giving him the title. I still think he has everything except some really strong-looking moves. He sells things like the five-knucle shuffle really well, but it's obviously a rubbish move. And the FU is a really hopeless finisher, less impact than a standard slam, though it's impressive when he can lift the likes of the Big Show. A few good moves, and he is guaranteed the main events.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

Cena's been on autopilot since turning face -- his matches are soooo formulaic. Incredibly, he's still really over even though his raps have been neutered (compared to his heel character) and he hasn't been having any great matches.

Shawn Michaels needs to jump to Smackdown (and likely turn heel) IN THE WORST WAY. If they want Cena to hold the belt long-term, then Cena should feud with Shawn and Angle, who'd make him look like a million bucks. Plus, we'd get to see Shawn v Eddie, Shawn v Taker (one of the only matches I'd want to see Taker in these days). Then Cena and JBL could resume feuding over the belt around Summerslam or Survivor Series, and move the belt back to JBL and start another chase to keep things fresh.

Unfortunately, the WWE seems set on turning Eddie heel (???), and I don't think Shawn would want to leave RAW and his buddy HHH (which makes me wonder how they're going to build the Angle-Shawn feud properly).

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

The idea (I think) is to turn Eddie full-blown heel (not that "Lie, Cheat, and Steal" tweener shit, proper back when he was teaming with Art Barr heel styleee), and then feud him with Rey Rey for the ultimate "Look, we want Hispanics to watch this" feud.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

I just watched the Rumble match. Pretty great stuff. I wish Batista would have done more than just throw spine busters left and right, but he still looked good. However, I worry about his prospects at the top. I think they've beem doing a fantastic job of protecting him, but when the time comes for him to go 20 minutes it might be a goddamn train wreck. Either way, props goes to him and Cena for actually nailing their double elimination and not making it look like the travesty that was Rock-Big Show.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 3 February 2005 05:05 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Batista will look really limited in an epic main event. When 'smashing you down hard' is all you've got, it's very hard to sustain a good match.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

This is where the "Goldberg Principle" applies -- that is, Batista won't look good wrestling a 20 minute main event, so don't book him in a 20 minute main event. I don't mean to sell Batista short, for Goldberg was all look and no talent whereas Big Dave has the look and quite a bit of talent, but regardless, he's not ready for 20 minute epics. At this point in his career, he's a very capable worker if he's in there with the right guy(s). For instance, his match with Benoit the week before New Years Revolution was a fantastic 7-10 minute power vs technique match.

Now, HHH being HHH, he'll want to do 20 minutes at Mania and I can't say I blame him. But hopefully he'll realize that a 12-13 minute match is better for business in the long run, particularly if their match goes on last.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

Goldberg worked a lot better matches in his prime than Batista is at the moment. Goldberg vs Raven and Goldberg vs DDP are underrated classics.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

Goldberg vs DDP was a fluke.
Batista is way more consistent right now than Goldberg ever was.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 4 February 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

Batista is def. better on the mic than Goldberg is. I dont think Goldberg could ever convey subtlety ever in his life, but I guess that goes against his appeal. Needless to say, Im pretty excited about the Road to Wrestlemania. Raw didnt offer much development, but it should be a good show, since apparently its one of the handful of shows the WWE puts serious development into. I just hope they shake up the rosters after WM.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 4 February 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

how hard is it to learn like say 3 more moves that isn't a powerbomb or a spine-buster though?

ken c (ken c), Monday, 7 February 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

Jesus, Jim Ross kept calling Charlie Haas 'Rene Dupree', even after Tazz had called him Haas, and then shouted 'au revoir' at him when he got eliminated, then carried on referring to Dupree, who was still in, without correcting himself. The dementia's just like causing him to see 'French sympathisers' everywhere now.

They could've done more with the Batista vs Cena stuff, the crowd were crazy for it and it ended up being really brief both before and after the interruption so McMahon could waddle out/crock himself hilariously/sit silently in the ring. I hope this doesn't mean they're holding off for a Batista/Cena/Layfield triple threat at WM.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)

The only way HHH vs Batista doesn't happen is if one of them drops dead before Mania. The "will Batista jump?" stuff is just storyline advancement in that feud.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

I'm having a lot of trouble believing this:

The ending of the WWE Royal Rumble this year was not the one scripted going in.

The original plan was to have John Cena escape from a Batista powerbomb one time, then get powerbombed a second time and tossed for the win. However, both men lost their balance and fell out of the ring together, sending the refs into a panic.

At first, they declared Batista the winner, but since it was clear Batista fell first, Vince called an audible from the back.

He went ahead with a tie storyline with Raw referees declaring Batista the winner and Smackdown referees declaring Cena the winner. Vince also decided to come down personally and direct the rest, and of course was injured as he came into the ring. He directed everyone from his seated position, including the ending that did go down, with Batista tossing Cena relatively quickly.

credit: Dave Meltzer Wrestling Observer Newsletter

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

I've always wondered what would happen if the predetermined Rumble winner accidentally gets tossed.

When it's down to the last two men, it should be a shoot.

alex in montreal, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

And that melodramatic Star Trek hand-to-hand combat music should be spontaneously piped in.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

how the fuck do both dudes lose balance together and simultanously fall out of the ring? Ill have to check out the tape when I get home.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand that either. I don't have a tape of it ... but didn't they show a replay of the double elimination? Had it been a mistake then they wouldn't have replayed it and shown the apparently obvious Batista elimination.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

i made a 2mb clip of it.

i've never used yousendit before though so this may or may not work...

brian badbreath (badwords), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Having watched that clip with the benefit of a pause button, it looks like Batista did hit first but that's as perfect a double-elimination as you will ever see.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

yeah, it looked pretty spot on to me

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 08:21 (twenty years ago)

remember both feet have to touch the ground to count!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 08:24 (twenty years ago)

one thing i was never really clear about... so the rule is that you're eliminated only if you go over the top rope and both feet touch the floor.. so that means you're free to enter and exit the ring under the bottom rope as often as you please??? surely some heels would have tried it.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 08:27 (twenty years ago)

A lot of heels have tried it, but they all subsequently lost the respect of the locker room. It's a huge price to pay.

alex in montreal, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 13:45 (twenty years ago)

So Vince tore a quad muscle (or two) just sliding into the ring? Steroids anyone? Goddamn..

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.