i have something to say about the offseason THE 2016 NBA OFFSEASON

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4503 of them)

batum is better than barnes so if barnes is getting a max deal its not impossible that he gets something big

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:10 (nine years ago)

other wing options would be parsons, bazemore

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:10 (nine years ago)

return of the bazed god

brimstead, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:24 (nine years ago)

Batum would be cool but he's injury prone

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:25 (nine years ago)

batum has played 70+ games the past 4 seasons, idk what the line is for 'injury prone'

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:38 (nine years ago)

batum wld be good as heck on the dubs

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:40 (nine years ago)

agreed

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:41 (nine years ago)

Always seems like he's out with something. Also played through a bad toe for like 1/3 of the last season and his production dipped. that 70+ games per year is kinda surprising

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:43 (nine years ago)

dubs can legitimately improve their team from this year's

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:43 (nine years ago)

And yes he's better than Barnes at everything. I'm all about batum

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:44 (nine years ago)

without durant i mean xp. obv durant does it

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:45 (nine years ago)

Yeah he's second on my list after durant

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:47 (nine years ago)

v much fear the improvening of the warriors. my preference is that all talent spurn them bc of 73-win jinx.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:51 (nine years ago)

like i wish ppl would stop talking like KD to the warriors is a distinct reality bc it makes me v v mad, way more mad than lebron and everybody going to miami bc they took a mediocre heat team into a juggernaut. kd would take a juggernaut into a word that should be illegal to say aloud.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:53 (nine years ago)

*whispers* a fuckernaut

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:53 (nine years ago)

the way i see it, there were 4 teams that were legit contenders and kd leaving okc for gs or sa would mean theres 3, right? bc okc would barely make the playoffs without him.

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:54 (nine years ago)

Thems the breaks when you have an mvp making the 6th most on the team

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:55 (nine years ago)

thats...that is NOT what kurtis blow said, those ARE NOT the breaks

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 01:58 (nine years ago)

Otm

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:00 (nine years ago)

*mounts hobby horse* this is a problem that is immediately solved with a hard cap and no max salary imo

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:01 (nine years ago)

for the sake of my own entertainment i don't really want the nba to turn into the nhl.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:05 (nine years ago)

oh not that, to clarify i think there should limits on contract lengths bc fuck 12 year contracts or w/e, but a player should be able to make as much as a team is willing to pay within the cap (so i guess its still a de facto max salary but just a way way higher ceiling)

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:21 (nine years ago)

i agree with eliminating max salaries but hard caps are so boring for roster management junkies of which i am increasingly one

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:24 (nine years ago)

Are you all a bunch of CPAs or quants or something? Cap management makes me zzz.

Interpretive Jigglypuffery (Leee), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:33 (nine years ago)

no it's just that the more ways you can fuck w/the cap the more options are open and the more crazy things you can discuss.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:36 (nine years ago)

i like the nba being biased towards teams retaining stars

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:39 (nine years ago)

i have a hard time feeling bad for people making 25 million a year missing out on money because of max salaries

k3vin k., Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:42 (nine years ago)

the problem this year is the cap jump which cldve been avoided by denominating contracts as a % of the cap instead of in dollars

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:45 (nine years ago)

i've actually never heard that floated before, that's a pr obvious and smart idea

Clay, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:49 (nine years ago)

thx

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:54 (nine years ago)

crazy thing is its in some way already the case, players get 50% of revenue

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:56 (nine years ago)

(also getting rid of max salaries)

6 god none the richer (m bison), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:56 (nine years ago)

That sounds like profit sharing!

Interpretive Jigglypuffery (Leee), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 02:59 (nine years ago)

Kurt Helin ‏@basketballtalk 2m2 minutes ago
AP Source: Timberwolves adding NBA’s 1st Chinese owner

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 03:35 (nine years ago)

well i'm voting for trump now for sure

Clay, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 03:55 (nine years ago)

gotta man

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 04:14 (nine years ago)

what your man got to do with me?

Neanderthal, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 04:21 (nine years ago)

aint

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 05:22 (nine years ago)

i have a hard time feeling bad for people making 25 million a year missing out on money because of max salaries

― k3vin k., Monday, June 27, 2016 10:42 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I don't really either but what other industry has a max salary? It's not like there's some tech commissioner telling Tim Cook his salary has to be capped so things are fair to google. If someone wants to pay Lebron (entire cap minus 14 minimum contracts) and see what happens I'd kind of be all for it!

gis for westbrook shark jump (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:13 (nine years ago)

Though I guess it's all fallout from sports leagues being arranged as one business entity that splits things 30 ways so maybe that analogy is bad

gis for westbrook shark jump (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:14 (nine years ago)

the hawks want in on the KD party, which is understandable, if they get immediately spurned their next priority is........dwight, which is not

if young slothrop don't trust ya i'm gon' rhyme ya (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:14 (nine years ago)

Anyway Batum would be rad on the Warriors way better than Barnes and kinda underrated

gis for westbrook shark jump (agent hibachi), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:15 (nine years ago)

its prob also in the league's interest to prevent stupid teams from being able to handicap themselves too badly e.g. the current state of brooklyn nets is about as bad as things can get within the rules

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:17 (nine years ago)

individual player salary max also reflects the fact that the players union is primarily made up of non max players who want a bigger slice of the pie

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:19 (nine years ago)

middle class wants more

moistest hoist (Spottie), Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:23 (nine years ago)

i actually like how byzantine the nba salary structure is its fun + funny

lag∞n, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:25 (nine years ago)

if you're gonna have a cap you might as well have a max salary just to protect the owners from themselves imo

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:28 (nine years ago)

the current structure feels like it works really well in keeping the good players distributed around the league, i would think long and hard before changing anything big

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:29 (nine years ago)

i think if there was a cap but no max you would see the best players distributed in a weirdly even way. there would be no way for a team to keep i.e. durant and westbrook together unless they mutually agreed to turn down $50 million per year contracts from other teams

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:33 (nine years ago)

and if there was no cap mark cuban would have like a $350 million payroll and it would be weird & bad

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 28 June 2016 16:33 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.