Something about the one-and-one seems wrong to me. You got hacked on a shot that would have been worth two points, shouldn't you get two shots at those points? Why should you have to "earn" that second shot? If you miss a field goal should you be prohibited from shooting on the next possession?
Then again, the 1&1 is really exciting at the collegiate level, and imagine the impact on guys like duncan and shaq if the nba adopted it. isn't the nbdl or some other podunk league experimenting with it this year? or was that the bizarre no-three-pointers thing i'm thinking of?
― metonymus prime (rgeary), Friday, 20 January 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)