eh this is a good time to reinstate my rule that i don't discuss the specifics of this story
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 15:49 (nine years ago) link
after all the leaks it turned out only one ball was outside the parameters
wasn't it 11 out of 12? or did I miss something?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 15:55 (nine years ago) link
Hunt3r, you really seem to have an agenda here. as an aside, with your perspective as a fan of afc playoff also-rans the denver broncos, what do you think might've motivated fellow playoff failures the indianapolis colts and the baltimore ravens to set this shitstorm in motion for the patriots?
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 15:56 (nine years ago) link
frogbs, subsequent review has shown that maybe 1, probably none of the balls were unreasonably under the the inflation range. if you're interested in the actual truth, the data is too garbage to have any confidence either way. if you're interested in what can be proven, it doesn't look great for the nfl.
there is a circumstantial case for the balls being tampered with after the officials' inspection. i think you can believe what you want on that. there is no kind of case that the balls were under the legal inflation range. could the balls have been deflated but still within range? some of the other details actually corroborate that possibility. all in all tho, it is a super thin basis for the nfl to go ham on, however you slice it.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:07 (nine years ago) link
there is no kind of case that the balls were under the legal inflation - i should qualify this with demonstrably or similar
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:08 (nine years ago) link
no the league leaked 11 of 12 during super bowl week and then iirc the actual report said 'or just one' and it may have been one the league subbed out. despite hunter's protestations that these guys are pros and god knows professional sports organizations tend to favor science over their guts or experience or what feels right i'm skeptical that these guys underinflate these balls w/ any kind of calibration beyond 'eh that should do it'. based on the ballboys texts and that at most 11 of 12 balls had the same psi i feel comfortable w/ that. in any case i don't think brady and greg hardy deserve the same suspension.
― balls, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:09 (nine years ago) link
they probably did /something/ but by now there's no possible excuse for this to still be a thing, the penalties should've been reduced bc they were absurd
that said, it's pretty amusing to see a corrupt robber-baron turned team owner more or less publicly buy a clearly corrupt/inept NFL commissioner nearly a decade ago and then /completely/ publicly complain that he's corrupt
― extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:13 (nine years ago) link
because he basically had to punish yr team w/ an excessive ruling so it would look briefly like he wasn't yr toady
― extremely lag∞n postings voice (slothroprhymes), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:14 (nine years ago) link
dude i don't recall what beefs exist between those teams other than brady talking some rulebook-reading shit at his presser, which was hilarious imo. whether that kicked off this whole thing i dunno, don't really care.
xpost
― wishy washy hippy variety hour (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:17 (nine years ago) link
I find it hard to believe that Brady wasn't doing something that at least was skirting the rules a bit, but it's no outrage because teams do this kind of thing all the time across every sport. Pitchers are constantly scuffing balls, NBA and soccer players are flopping to draw fouls, baseball teams are stealing signs or finding ways to spy on each other, it happens, it gets punished, but the idea of losing 1/4th of the season AND a draft pick AND a million bucks is so insanely absurd that I can't help but love how it's blown up on the NFL
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:39 (nine years ago) link
yeah as far as 'cheating' goes this is definitely more in line w/ vaseline on the glove or flopping than something like the niners or twolves salary cap shenanigans. then again so is pumping in crowd noise (except that's also by far stupider)(esp if it's already clearly a lost season) and the nfl cracks down on that so this isn't out of line w/ the nfl is incredibly stupid and random when it comes to discipline. i tried to quit this sport last fall (falcons sucked so should've been easy) but by spring was so far back in i was reading mock drafts. love the game but everything surrounding it is so toxic. seriously guys give hoops a chance. i say this as a guy who swore for years the nba would never be as good as it was w/ bird/magic/young jordan - basketball has never been better than it is right now.
― balls, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:48 (nine years ago) link
yeah I think I need to watch a lot more basketball this season
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:53 (nine years ago) link
if I could watch more live west coast nba I def would
im telling myself ill still watch college ftball but way less nfl this yr, I even think the sport at the nfl level is sorta boring now and too random as far as game outcomes
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 16:58 (nine years ago) link
i like basketball but there's too many games. idk why that is such a barrier for me but i can't get invested in individual games when i try and can't get past just being a playoff watcher. also, the learning curve is steep, i already knew about football since a kid but i knew nothing at all about basketball prior to rocking up here.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 17:08 (nine years ago) link
college sports idk, giant cultural barrier, cannot contemplate taking seriously
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 17:11 (nine years ago) link
thing about football is, it's great. i do rue all of the shit that sucks about it tho.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 17:12 (nine years ago) link
ok i cannot resist b/c this is the first time i saw these...here are two footnotes from the wells report:
Footnote 11 page 35The guidelines stated that: “Prior to each game, a team‟s equipment manager will prepare 12 footballs to be used for non-kicking downs. The footballs will have the prior approval of the team‟s quarterback, who can briefly test them the preceding week, but the balls cannot be used during midweek or pregame practice sessions. These footballs will be delivered to the officials‟ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to game time. The Referee will insure that they are properly inflated and give final approval for their use. Game balls approved for a previous game can be submitted, provided they meet the standards of a new ball. The home team will prepare another 12 balls in the event of inclement weather or other reasons.” Under the current guidelines, a referee also may reject footballs in the course of a game if he determines that they are in “unsatisfactory condition.”
Footnote 21 page 41During our investigation, we also obtained information concerning the football preparation process used by the Colts. Colts personnel informed us that, like the Patriots, they take new footballs and rub them with a wet or warm towel to remove the outer preservative, followed by brushing with the same brushes provided by Wilson. Footballs are then used during practice, with the expectation that normal wear and tear on the footballs, and their interaction with players‟ sweat, will help break in the balls. Sean Sullivan, the Colts Equipment Manager, explained that, in his view, the best way to soften the leather is for the footballs to interact with sweat during practice and then get baked in the sun. The Colts repeat the brushing and baking process, and continue to practice with the footballs as they are broken in, until they reach a certain point, when they will be set aside for potential game use. The footballs will be inflated to a pressure between 12.9 and 13.05 psi prior to being inspected by Colts quarterback Andrew Luck, who typically selects his game balls two days before each game. The designated balls are placed into ball bags and kept locked in the Colts equipment room until their pressure is checked again shortly before being delivered to the game officials.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 19:58 (nine years ago) link
that'll be a 1st round pick, sorry guys
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 20:04 (nine years ago) link
can't spell "parity" without patrito(y)
― let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 July 2015 20:15 (nine years ago) link
I think it's entirely possible that Brady was involved. I don't think the Wells Report proved it whatsoever (he "probably" did it, not good enough). as much as it benefits my Fins to have him out four games, as a fan of the game, it gives me a bad taste for this arbitrary punishment for something so silly (that they didn't even prove).
bah....replace Goodell with Kato Kaelin
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 22:42 (nine years ago) link
goodell: brady trashed cell phone
100% brady recycled his phone and SIM when upgrading
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, July 28, 2015 5:03 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
nfl sez it was the day-of wells coming to investigate that he destroyed it
which, still, he prob just had sum good nudez he didn't want the nfl to leak
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 29 July 2015 23:48 (nine years ago) link
http://markatlarge.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/rob-gronkowski-naked3.jpg
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Thursday, 30 July 2015 04:35 (nine years ago) link
had to protect his buddy
well he didn't have to shave his buddy
― let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 July 2015 04:37 (nine years ago) link
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/even-tom-brady-smash-phone-itd-make-zero-sense/
― polyphonic, Thursday, 30 July 2015 20:27 (nine years ago) link
Subject: RE: Winter Pool CoverFrom: Tom Brady Date: Wed, October 22, 2014 3:52 pm To: Ben Rawitz
What kind of morons don’t have white cover. Can we check with another company
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 14:44 (nine years ago) link
From the salon article polyphonic linked:
"The digital trail our phones leave behind long outlive the physical device itself, and the league could have potentially tracked down the information in a number of ways..."
The article fails to mention what those "number of ways" would be, but rather mentions a number of places the data might be stored, which is different, because the NFL is not a law enforcement agency and has no subpoena power. So I'm not sure whether they would have any legal means to acquire such data, even though it would undoubtedly still be stored somewhere.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 18:22 (nine years ago) link
the point is that the destruction of the phone is not relevant to them getting that data.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 18:26 (nine years ago) link
Which the article doesn't actually establish. If the phone, with data, had been surrendered for inspection, the data would certainly have been placed in the NFL's possession. The bare fact that the data still exists doesn't prove the NFL could access it now by any means in their power.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 19:10 (nine years ago) link
brady needs to allow the nfl access to the data or be compelled to do so, regardless of where it's stored.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 19:15 (nine years ago) link
Brady can reasonably say that he is not in possession of the data. He doesn't control the servers where it would now be stored. Anyway, the NFL decided it had enough evidence to draw a conclusion without the phone data.
Now, if Brady were to sue in court over the suspension, perhaps the NFL could pursue the phone data through discovery. So far, Brady has only pursued his appeal under the collective bargaining agreement, as far as I know.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 19:19 (nine years ago) link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2015/08/05/roger-goodell-misled-me-brady-appeal-transcript-shows/
― balls, Wednesday, 5 August 2015 19:49 (nine years ago) link
http://www.theonion.com/article/patriots-tired-jimmy-garoppolo-beginning-every-hud-51022?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=SocialMarketing&utm_campaign=LinkPreview:1:Default
― balls, Friday, 7 August 2015 04:18 (nine years ago) link
https://twitter.com/_JakeRussell/status/630038112257867776
feelings
― Roberto Spiralli, Saturday, 8 August 2015 16:29 (nine years ago) link
oh lol, image tagged a twitter link, not bad
― Roberto Spiralli, Saturday, 8 August 2015 16:30 (nine years ago) link
https://twitter.com/PPVSRB
some good quotes here. judge seems to believe it is likely that deflation occurred (no mention of allowed range tho) and that brady was at least aware of it. skeptical of anything more than that, in particular that the nfl has any actual evidence of brady's involvement or of any 'conspiracy'. nfl response shows they have literally nothing: we think deflation occurred, brady is qb, QED.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:08 (nine years ago) link
nflpa lawyer seems to be a dickhead tho, which could swing the case.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:11 (nine years ago) link
nfl response shows they have literally nothing
I think its more accurate to say that the nfl has circumstantial evidence, but no direct evidence. Given what has been established as fact, one may deduce a limited number of scenarios that fit those facts. A few of those scenarios exculpate Brady, but most would not.
This kind of reasoning would not be sufficient in a criminal trial, but the NFL isn't putting Brady in prison, either. afaics, they are claiming only that a preponderance of the evidence supports their conclusion and that's good enough.
The only real question here is whether the league's actions are allowed under the collective bargaining agreement. If they are allowed, then the 4-game suspension sticks. If not, then he plays.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:23 (nine years ago) link
surprisingly little on process tho, really just allowing the sides to restate their respective cases, which for the nfl is just that cba = rog can do what he wants, which hasn't worked before but doesn't mean it won't work now.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:30 (nine years ago) link
as far as "Given what has been established as fact" and "preponderance of the evidence" go, i guess you have access to some info the rest of us don't
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:31 (nine years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMOYcQ4WoAA2MT-.jpg
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:42 (nine years ago) link
what is Robert durst doing there
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:50 (nine years ago) link
I think Brady is going to walk.
― earlnash, Friday, 14 August 2015 01:26 (nine years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwSlEvG0ngo
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 14 August 2015 02:00 (nine years ago) link
CHILLS
― call all destroyer, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:03 (nine years ago) link
also that first cut of patricia is hilarious
― call all destroyer, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:05 (nine years ago) link
Right?
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:08 (nine years ago) link
latest brady judge quotes make it clear there is no way if he is forced to a ruling that the suspension will stand, even if you allow for some rhetoric with him trying to push the nfl towards settlement.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 18:15 (nine years ago) link
i will be sad when this is resolved whatever the outcome because it has been at least a little distraction from the miserable reality that the pats lost two gdamn draft picks over this weak shit
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 18:24 (nine years ago) link
http://www.stradleylaw.com/bob-mcnair-deflategate-comments/
imo owners would be advised to keep this whole thing at arms length to avoid getting shit on their sports coat by association. for some i'm sure it is hard to suppress their glee at the stitch up.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:21 (nine years ago) link