oh lol, image tagged a twitter link, not bad
https://twitter.com/_JakeRussell/status/630038112257867776
― Roberto Spiralli, Saturday, 8 August 2015 16:30 (nine years ago) link
https://twitter.com/PPVSRB
some good quotes here. judge seems to believe it is likely that deflation occurred (no mention of allowed range tho) and that brady was at least aware of it. skeptical of anything more than that, in particular that the nfl has any actual evidence of brady's involvement or of any 'conspiracy'. nfl response shows they have literally nothing: we think deflation occurred, brady is qb, QED.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:08 (nine years ago) link
nflpa lawyer seems to be a dickhead tho, which could swing the case.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:11 (nine years ago) link
nfl response shows they have literally nothing
I think its more accurate to say that the nfl has circumstantial evidence, but no direct evidence. Given what has been established as fact, one may deduce a limited number of scenarios that fit those facts. A few of those scenarios exculpate Brady, but most would not.
This kind of reasoning would not be sufficient in a criminal trial, but the NFL isn't putting Brady in prison, either. afaics, they are claiming only that a preponderance of the evidence supports their conclusion and that's good enough.
The only real question here is whether the league's actions are allowed under the collective bargaining agreement. If they are allowed, then the 4-game suspension sticks. If not, then he plays.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:23 (nine years ago) link
surprisingly little on process tho, really just allowing the sides to restate their respective cases, which for the nfl is just that cba = rog can do what he wants, which hasn't worked before but doesn't mean it won't work now.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:30 (nine years ago) link
as far as "Given what has been established as fact" and "preponderance of the evidence" go, i guess you have access to some info the rest of us don't
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:31 (nine years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMOYcQ4WoAA2MT-.jpg
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:42 (nine years ago) link
what is Robert durst doing there
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:50 (nine years ago) link
I think Brady is going to walk.
― earlnash, Friday, 14 August 2015 01:26 (nine years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwSlEvG0ngo
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 14 August 2015 02:00 (nine years ago) link
CHILLS
― call all destroyer, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:03 (nine years ago) link
also that first cut of patricia is hilarious
― call all destroyer, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:05 (nine years ago) link
Right?
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 14 August 2015 03:08 (nine years ago) link
latest brady judge quotes make it clear there is no way if he is forced to a ruling that the suspension will stand, even if you allow for some rhetoric with him trying to push the nfl towards settlement.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 18:15 (nine years ago) link
i will be sad when this is resolved whatever the outcome because it has been at least a little distraction from the miserable reality that the pats lost two gdamn draft picks over this weak shit
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 18:24 (nine years ago) link
http://www.stradleylaw.com/bob-mcnair-deflategate-comments/
imo owners would be advised to keep this whole thing at arms length to avoid getting shit on their sports coat by association. for some i'm sure it is hard to suppress their glee at the stitch up.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 2 September 2015 17:21 (nine years ago) link
brady freed
for now at least
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:18 (nine years ago) link
lol
― mookieproof, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:19 (nine years ago) link
i cant see how it would matter even if the league did appeal, which, like...god just let this die
that said it does allow the pats to soldier on like the automatons of corporate nobility kraft wants them to be, was kinda hoping this would make them into truly vicious heels who might actually be entertaining as a result
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:32 (nine years ago) link
truly vicious heels who might actually be entertaining
wait, they aren't?
― mookieproof, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:37 (nine years ago) link
looking at comments from pats fans and can see cogs slowly but slowly turning as they realize that no the draft picks aren't coming back and kraft fucked them over by laying down on the team punishment
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:45 (nine years ago) link
[pounds sam adams]
― lag∞n, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:47 (nine years ago) link
canyon between brady appealing as a player and the team fighting their part of course but the angry mob won't pick up on that
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:49 (nine years ago) link
xps mook i dunno, they're a team whose slogan last year was "do your job," that's pretty neutered and corporate imo, kraft's corrupt oligarch status is villainous but in the same banal fashion
like this is an absurd sport, it deserves more comic book villains in its repertoire, resurrect al davis imo
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:53 (nine years ago) link
― lag∞n, Thursday, September 3, 2015 10:47 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
haha damn man its early in colorado, hope you have the day off
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:54 (nine years ago) link
love itttt
― usic ally (k3vin k.), Thursday, 3 September 2015 14:58 (nine years ago) link
I don't like the Pats but I'm pretty happy about this really
― frogbs, Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:02 (nine years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CN_LlrtWIAEsESW.jpg
― mookieproof, Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:03 (nine years ago) link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CN_IHa_XAAAlGKU.png
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:16 (nine years ago) link
lmao
― lag∞n, Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:21 (nine years ago) link
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, September 3, 2015 10:54 AM (49 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://i.imgur.com/KbJvGvw.jpg
― lag∞n, Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:45 (nine years ago) link
lol what a great day.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 3 September 2015 17:52 (nine years ago) link
bill belichick just gave the most cheerful interview i've ever seen him give
― call all destroyer, Friday, 4 September 2015 01:14 (nine years ago) link
my Dolphins fan friends are treating this verdict like the Casey Anthony trial. idgi. this was the right decision all around.
You can't basically let the Vikings and Panthers do something similar and be all like "aight knock it the fuck off" and nothing more, then get advance warning about the Patriots do it and decide to ensnare them in a sting operation. Not to mention that no matter the suspicions, that Wells Report didn't prove a damn thing.
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 01:21 (nine years ago) link
any legal experts wanna weigh in on the likelihood of the ruling being reversed on appeal?
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 01:22 (nine years ago) link
from what i've read the 2nd circuit is considered highly competent and is unlikely to overturn a reasonable ruling.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 4 September 2015 01:54 (nine years ago) link
feeling deflated by this turn of events :'-(
― you too could be called a 'Star' by the Compliance Unit (jim in glasgow), Friday, 4 September 2015 02:52 (nine years ago) link
altho it makes goodell look dumb so yay i guess
― you too could be called a 'Star' by the Compliance Unit (jim in glasgow), Friday, 4 September 2015 02:53 (nine years ago) link
Goodell's been an unmitigated disaster, part of me wonders how well Tagliabue would have fared in this day and age. he definitely was too soft on discipline, Goodell's largely overcorrected but then just when you think he's just a stern disciplinarian that gets a little overzealous, he completely whiffs on the Ray Rice incident.
he didn't create most of the problems the league has now but he sure as shit hasn't really improved them either.
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 03:15 (nine years ago) link
I'd love to hear what kind of smack Tagliabue is talking about Goodell when he thinks no one will repeat what he's saying.
― Aimless, Friday, 4 September 2015 03:22 (nine years ago) link
"really bad kisser"
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 03:27 (nine years ago) link
lol massachusetts is sometimes the best kind of assholes http://deadspin.com/patriots-planned-to-raise-a-tom-brady-banner-if-brady-w-1728717380
― lag∞n, Friday, 4 September 2015 14:36 (nine years ago) link
i found this funny when it happened, i find it funny that they upheld it, i find it funny that they struck it down. all this shit is funny.
― Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Friday, 4 September 2015 20:27 (nine years ago) link
wonder if Goodell is gonna pull a Bill Pullman in ID4 and strap on a helmet and try to take him down...ON the field!
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 20:29 (nine years ago) link
settle it via bareknuckle brawl imo
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 4 September 2015 20:51 (nine years ago) link
but it should be between kraft and goodell
"And I did what I had to do to win! But somebody wouldn't let us win!"
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 20:52 (nine years ago) link
any legal experts wanna weigh in on the likelihood of the ruling being reversed on appeal?― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, September 4, 2015 1:22 AM (21 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, September 4, 2015 1:22 AM (21 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Im not lawyer but basic access to evidence and witnesses is the backbone of our legal system and rog didnt think it applied in his kangaroo court
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 4 September 2015 23:16 (nine years ago) link
it was def a farce of a 'trial' in the NFL, but some have said (and I don't know how accurate they are) that it seems to be a right afforded to him by the CBA and that it's weird that it got overturned. mostly why I'm curious.
― Hammer Smashed Bagels, Friday, 4 September 2015 23:31 (nine years ago) link
the ruling was based on lack of notice of punishment, lack of access to witnesses, and lack of equal access to information, all of which have fuck all to do with rog's rights under integrity of the game.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 4 September 2015 23:34 (nine years ago) link