This is the thread where you can ask a dum football question

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And someone will help you. Fuck a google or a wikapedia. I want ILNFL-style answers!

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

OK. Please explain me:

1. "nickle defense"
2. "cushion"

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)

nickel defense = having five (5) defensive backs in at the same time, usually to prevent big-gain pass plays

cushion = several meanings but mostly when a DB plays a few yards off the line of scrimmage to make sure he doesn't blow past you (instead of getting right up on him and playing bump and run)

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)

okay well here is everything I learned from Madden '94, which basically taught me everything i know abt football. nickle defense is when u have a fifth defensive back on the field (normally there are four), the extra DB being known as the "nickleback" (cuz he's the fifth one DO YOU SEE). you usually employ this defense in passing situations. 'cushion' is the space (usually 5 yards but it varies depending on the scheme and situation) between a wide receiver and defensive back at the line of scrimmage; the DB usually wants enough space to ensure that the play stays in front of him even if the receiver makes a catch. the opposite is bump & run coverage, where the DBs are right across from the receivers at the line of scrimmage with the intent of fucking them up as soon as the ball snaps (you can molest the fuck out of them as long as they're w/i 5 yards of the LoS). n e wayz, this will hopefully throw them off their routes and screw up the timing of the pass play.

FUCK BABY SURI I HOPE IT CHOKES TO DEATH ON HUBBARD WAFERS (Adrian Langston), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:41 (nineteen years ago)

xpost - yeah, what he said.

FUCK BABY SURI I HOPE IT CHOKES TO DEATH ON HUBBARD WAFERS (Adrian Langston), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:41 (nineteen years ago)

also this is really fascinating even though i don't understand big chunks of it:

http://pigskinplanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=2

FUCK BABY SURI I HOPE IT CHOKES TO DEATH ON HUBBARD WAFERS (Adrian Langston), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)

What's a crackback mountain?

c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 18 September 2006 00:52 (nineteen years ago)

Thank you! That was v. helpful although I need some sort of schematic that shows which position is where along the line of scrimmage. Also, what position do you give up when you do a fifth DB? I mean isn't that leaving something uncovered? Basically what is risk vs. benefit of nickle defense?

I'm also not terribly clear on "pocket," which I take it is not the same thing at all as "cushion"?

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)

pocket = the "space" created around the quarterback by good pass protection. it is like a cushion but it is called a pocket.

in nickel coverage, one usually sacrifices a linebacker (okay to give up the short pass instead of the long one) or maybe go to a three-man line and rush them all (okay to give up a run, plenty of guys back there to stop it). usually an LB though, and good riddance to those glory whores. (I was a safety and cornerback, we did all the really hard stuff.)

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 18 September 2006 01:54 (nineteen years ago)

Why can't Ray Lewis seem to find his dogs?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

Why does that one guys run back and forth behind the qb before the center(?) passes (is the what you call the under the legs thing?) the ball to him. Is there any easy way to learn about the various positions?

So far, I guess the halfback and the fullback are teh guys that stand behind the quarterback. Perhaps the running back is the guy who runs back and forth?

Mary (Mary), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

because they're NOT IN (T)HIS HOUSE

xp

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

the guy who runs back and forth is simply a guy "in motion". he is often a wide receiver or tight end, or is sometimes a "slotback" or with yr redskins an "h-back"

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:30 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_%28American_football%29

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

the center(?) passes (is the what you call the under the legs thing?) the ball to him

called the "snap"

Stormy Davis (diamond), Monday, 18 September 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

Whoa mookie that page is rather intimidating. I think what would work best for me is sitting in a bar with pints and and a tablet and a sharpie, with some knowledgable person to draw stuff for me (HINT).

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 10:42 (nineteen years ago)

dude i've been watching football all my life and i can't even explain most things involving the line, eg why you've got to have a certain number of players on the line of scrimmage vs in the backfield, what is up with the illegal man downfield rule, etc etc

sitting in a bar with pints sounds good, tho

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 18 September 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)

Illegal man downfield: So an O-lineman can't sneak off the line off scrimmage and catch a pass from the QB. OMG teh loffles that would transpire!Q Which is why you'll sometimes hear the refs say that so-and-so is an eligible receiver on the play, i.e. he can go upfield and theoretically is eligible to catch teh ballz0r. The penalty gets called a lot on screen plays when guards/tackles get too far upfield before the RB gets the ball.

c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

Illegal man downfield: So an O-lineman can't sneak off the line off scrimmage and catch a pass from the QB. OMG teh loffles that would transpire!

LOL at TEs?

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

TE is many things, therefore eligible

Jimmy Mod's Champion Erotic Fantasy Team 2006 (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

TEs aren't technically linemen, I believe -- the real ones wear receivers' numbers, after all. But if the coach/offensive ccordinator brings in some D-Line fattey to play TE, then fattey needs to check in w/ the ref to let the opposing defense know that fattey might conceivably catch a pass.

c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

TEs play on line, therefore they are linemen, end of story, shut book, return book to library, check out new book or maybe a DVD.

I believe the rule is a very old one designed to differentiate football from rugby scrums; also maybe the deaths that resulted from the "flying wedge" might have had something to do with it. Anyway, it's just the rule that there have to be seven men on the line, no point in worrying why.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

But if the coach/offensive ccordinator brings in some D-Line fattey to play TE, then fattey needs to check in w/ the ref to let the opposing defense know that fattey might conceivably catch a pass.

that's not necessarily true since "eligibles" are based on uniform number. so if you have a d-lineman wearing #85, he wouldn't need to check in with the referee. he's eligible by virtue of his uni #.

xpost- no, te's are ends not lineman. they usually line up next to the tackle, hence the "tight end" versus a wideout who is further from the line being a "split end".

otto midnight (otto midnight), Monday, 18 September 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

Wait what is this about numbers meaning something special? I mean I know that the QB wears like 1-10 or something, but what exactly do the other numbers mean?

Re: eligible receiver. Is the defense allowed to tackle eligible receivers or do they have to stay upright and therefore conceivably able to catch a pass? Also, if the QB takes off running up the field, can he then throw forward when he faces some fattey and freaks out, or does the fact that he ran, say, 10 yards disqualify him from passing?

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

controversy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

harbl (Adrian Langston), Monday, 18 September 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

you can't pass once you go past the line of scrimmage btw. i think maybe you can lateral but don't quote me on that shit

harbl (Adrian Langston), Monday, 18 September 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

You can pass backwards / lateral past the line of scrimmage, but it's a fumble if it's not completed and/or dropped.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 18 September 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

Got it. As for my poorly worded eligble receiver question, let me rephrase: can you tackle an eligible receiver before he has the chance to catch a pass?

quincie (quincie), Monday, 18 September 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

No. You can "bump" him within the first five yards, but not thereafter, or if the ball is in the air. On the other end of the pass, you have to time your hit to coincide exactly with the receiver touching the ball, and then impact him with sufficient force to cause him to drop the ball, jar the ball loose, knock him silly, etc. Hit him early, accidentally trip him while chasing him, or touch him anywhere past five yards and it's pass interference. That is of course another reason that defensive back is the most difficult position on the field, and the most special.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 18 September 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

otto, my palindrominous friend: TEs aren't technically linemen, I believe -- the real ones wear receivers' numbers, after all.

NUMBERS
1-19: QBs, kickers
20-49: Backs (defensive or running)
50-59: Linebackers
60-69: Guards, centers
70-79: Tackles
80-89: Receivers (includes tight ends)
90-99: Defensive linemen
00: Donkeys

Sometimes you'll see WRs or RBs with 18 or some number under 20. THESE GUYS ARE STYLING BASTARDS.

c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 18 September 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

linebackers can wear 90's, i think, and defensive linemen can definitely wear 70's.

you also have the odd outlier like former raider TE todd christensen:
http://imagesource.art.com/images/products/regular/10108000/10108300.jpg

i know o-linemen can't catch passes (apart from the odd tackle-eligible), but i don't really understand why they can't be downfield not catching passes, most especially on punts where they've got to wait five seconds or something to release, right?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 18 September 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

I'm guessing you can only have a set number of eligible receivers per play. I'm thinking 5, or 4? Otherwise, everything would get goofy.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 18 September 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know about the punting thing, but I think that downfield is the sole provenance of eligible receivers. By being past 5 yards or whatever, a player is announcing himself as a receiver, eligible or not, even if he's just blocking. Maybe officials don't want fatteys clogging up the routes and screening the defenders.

See RB screens getting called back because of ineligible receivers when O-linemen pull out in front of the RB too far upfield.

Upfield/downfield whatever.

c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 18 September 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)

i know o-linemen can't catch passes (apart from the odd tackle-eligible), but i don't really understand why they can't be downfield not catching passes ...

Firstly, because it would be unfair to have a huge offensive lineman blocking for a receiver as he goes out for a pass. Secondly, because it would be unfairly confusing to the defense to send too many people past the line of scrimmage, because the defense wouldn't be able to tell quickly enough who they had to bother covering and who they wouldn't.

... most especially on punts where they've got to wait five seconds or something to release, right?

They've got to wait until the ball is kicked. This was a rule change from the early '70s designed to increase punt returns.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 16:20 (nineteen years ago)

linebackers can wear 90's, i think, and defensive linemen can definitely wear 70's."

Alot of this has changed in the last 15-20 years, as you get these uber athlete DE/OLB that are mostly known as pass rushers, but then sometimes will actually stick and cover either a TE or running back out of the backfield on pass plays.

Back in the 80s, you would never see a DE drop back in coverage, but will see it happen quite a bit now and then, especially with clubs running a 3-4 setup (3 down linemen, 4 linebackers).


I think Todd Christensen like quite a few TE's started out as more of a traditional FB. The Vik's Jim Kleinsasser is another FB that generally always plays TE these days. Dallas Clark is another TE that goes with #44, but Indy generally goes with only one back and either two TEs or three WRs in their offensive formations.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 01:05 (nineteen years ago)

player numbers by position.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

Can you pass it as many times as you like behind the line of scrimmage - do laterals have some sort of special status? Can you hand it off, ever, past it?

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

yes, you are limited to one forward pass but you can pass it laterally or backwards as many times as you wish.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 12:38 (nineteen years ago)

Why does no one do that very often? I think I've yet to see more than one pass on a play (note: I have been watching football for approx. two weeks now).

quincie (quincie), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

because throwing a football accurately and with enough zip on it to get it past a defender is something that is a lot more difficult than it looks. that's why quarterbacks are paid so much. if it were easy, if ANYONE on the team could successfully, regularly put the ball where they want it when they need it then the qb position would be filled by a scrub.

there's an old football adage about when you pass the ball three things can happen and two of them are bad. anytime you put the ball in the air it's a gamble. when you have someone who isn't used to throwing a ball throwing the ball it can be disasterous. ask the carolina panthers.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

to Gravel: YES! you can lateral as many times -- behind or across the LOS -- as possible. behold:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAxu9Rfm77M

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

Also, check *this* awesome play:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrY2jkE3WzE

(what that youtube clip doesn't mention was that, after that amazing, improbable, last-play-of-the-game TD, the Saints MISSED the extra point that would have tied the game and sent it to overtime!)


One of the most infamous laterals in NFL history:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JIpHqPIorU

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

oh actually, here's a clip of the Saints play with the missed PAT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1tEY7jA-Pk

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)

i wish youtube wasn't blocked at work :(

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

Wow! Thanks for the clips. I still don't really get how in rugby it seems that often there's a dude behind the runner and when he's tackled he can sort of feed it to him before he goes down, how come this never happens? But I guess this is some bizzare consequence of blocking rules or positional specialties or something.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

the Steelers, on the march to last year's Super Bowl (two views):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtM7CWhMIWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLn250rWTOc

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

Gravel, because it's VERY risky. The would-be receiver of the hand off might not be expecting it, which would result in a fumble, ESPECIALLY if the defender(s) is/are trying to pry the ball loose as well.

Also, sometimes during kickoffs (and I think (rarely) punt returns), the returner will hand off to another guy on his squad as a set play.

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

gravel, it's a risk/reward thing. not worth the risk of losing possession of the ball for a minimal gain. if a ball carrier's team mate is close enough to be handed the ball by someone being tackled then that team mate should probably be trying to lay a block on someone and if he isn't then he's unaware of what's going on in the play and would most likely get popped and cough up the ball before making any sort of gain. better just to hang onto it and try again next down.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 17:00 (nineteen years ago)

another great one from seasons past:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1skPX5UKuqU

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

(and that's more of an example of the rugby-style tackle/handoff that Gravel is talking about)

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

are your communication skills poor?

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)

why are you people making shit up?

Allyzay is a town of people, people who DIED (allyzay), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

No but perhaps you should get your sarcasm detector fixed!

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

daerest KLG: wanna meet up at 1pm sunday nearish your house, watch game numero uno in which I 'splain questions to you, and then head to ZR's thingy together??? Mr. Que can join if he wants.

Allyzay is a town of people, people who DIED (allyzay), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

because this thread just ain't gonna learn no-one any damn thing.

Allyzay is a town of people, people who DIED (allyzay), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

"you people" = me.

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

Tom was the one claiming mad shit about punters holding the ball and doing crazy kickoffs on a regular basis, I think y'all are trying to trick Miss Quincie into drafting only kickers and ignoring RBs in her fantasy league or something.

Allyzay is a town of people, people who DIED (allyzay), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

Punters do usually hold for the kickers though! (At least, AFAIK.) I don't think teams want #2 QBs to risk getting hurt. I seem to remember some medium-notable news item some years back where a backup QB holding for the kicker got hurt, oh noes all around.

FTR, I only made up the PAT points system, in case anyone wants any references.

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)

touchbacks are good for kickoffs, bad for punts.

"i didn't mean to be that dismissive with that first comment but it looks bad now that i re-read it. i forget that it takes a while to learn all this stuff especially if it wasnt drilled into your head
when you were four years old by your 49ERS FANATIC DAD"

yes it does. what's crazy about football is that you eventually realize it's really not more complicated strategically than any other sport, there's just so much that you have to know to be able to follow it.

"PUNTERS make over 300,000 dollars a year or something! If you ever have a child, see if you can make them a good PUNTER."

see also: LONG SNAPPER

harbl (Adrian Langston), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)

"Why does no one do that very often? I think I've yet to see more than one pass on a play (note: I have been watching football for approx. two weeks now). "

You won't see too many two pass plays, but the Steelers do use quite a few trick plays with other players throwing the ball, most famously with Antwaan Randle El throwing a TD to Hines Ward in the Superbowl last year.

Of course, Randle El and Hines Ward were both QB's in college that converted to wideout in the NFL.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 20 September 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)

in 86 or 87 the pats experimented with running the option inside the 10 yard line with wideout stephan starring lining up under center. he ran the option as a qb at mcneese st. in college. it was a fun wrinkle in the wanning days of raymond berry.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 21 September 2006 12:11 (nineteen years ago)

daerest KLG: wanna meet up at 1pm sunday nearish your house, watch game numero uno in which I 'splain questions to you, and then head to ZR's thingy together???

YES LET'S DO THIS!

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

And I kind of lost track: do you or do you not lose points on the try-for-two-points-after-TD thing if you go backward? You can't be sarcastic on this thread because some of us are DUM and will TAKE YOU SRSLY and may later EMBARRASS OURSELVES by proclaiming NONTRUTHS in BARS FULL OF FB FANS.

Also is that two point thingy a "conversion"?

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

NO, you can never lose points on either a kick-for-extra-point or a run/pass-for-two-point-*conversion*, no matter what happens. once the try fails for any reason the play is dead. -- in the Pros that is.

In *college* football, the ball can actually be ran back by the defensive team on these plays, if they can strip/recover it from the offensive team. If they reach the opposite end zone, they get two points.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)

q, :D we can either do AM or we can go towards the Cleve Park metro, there's 4P there and they've got a ginormous screen but not sure what games they will show. I'll move this discussion to the DC thread I suppose.

Allyzay is a town of people, people who DIED (allyzay), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

Sounds good! Maybe 4Ps and we can demand to watch Indy on big screen!

I am afraid to ask about fantasy fb. . .

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

touchbacks are good for kickoffs, bad for punts.

OK I need a little more clarification on this. Because with kickoff you want it to go into the endzone so play starts at 20 yrd line (and not closer to your endzone)? And with a punt you, uh. . . OK I don't get why bad for punt. OH WAIT THAT WOULD BE A SAFETY RIGHT? Hey maybe I am getting the hang of this!

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

And say, don't forget that the offense can score three points by kicking the ball through the uprights AT ANY TIME.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

Oh wait forget that safety thing that is clearly wrong. So I still don't get why touchback is bad on punt.

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

So I still don't get why touchback is bad on punt.

since the punter actually hold the ball and drop kicks it (as opposed to kicking off a tee on kickoffs) he should be able to adjust the direction/angle of the ball to either put it out of bounds inside the 10 yard line or effect the spin of the ball so it doesn't bounce into the endzone.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

What Otto said - ideally, when you're punting, you want to try and pin the other team as deep in their own territory as possible. That's why you'll see the guys on punt coverage team (AKA the dudes on the punter's team) trying to keep balls from getting into the endzone (and doing all sorts of acrobatic things to keep it out). Ideally, if you do pin the other team deep in their own end of the field, your defense can:

a) force the other team to punt, thereby giving the offense better field position (preferable on the good side of the 50 yd line) for the next series
b) force a turnover that will give the offense great field position
c) get a safety (which gets you 2 pts AND the ball back)

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

If you're punting the ball on your side of the field touchbacks become more desirable. If you're punting the ball near mid-field or in your opponents half of the field touchbacks are a no-no.

If you punt the ball on the 50-yard line and it goes in for a touchback it's a net yardage punt of 30 yards- not good.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

xposts galore

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Whoa I'm kinda confused. Is having the opposing team get the ball at the 20 really so much worse than at the 10? 'Cause they get it at the 20 if it's a touchback, yes? Or did I miss something? It just seems like an awful big fuss over 10 yards, which does not seem like a whole hell of a lot. I guess it's a first down.

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

Srsly basketball is like ten thousand times easier to get than football :)

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)

Ten yards is a big deal near your own goal line. Teams tend to be more conservative back there. You're calling different plays on your 10 than you are on your 20.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

10 yards is a big deal because a 7 step drop (which will give you enough time for a receiver to run a route downfield) is going to take you back about 7 yards. if you get flushed out of the pocket and have to go backwards to escape pressure, you're going into your own endzone risking a safety that will give your opposition not only two points but posession of the ball as well.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

better explain the pocket!

mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 21 September 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

Wait I think we already covered pocket! At least somewhere upthread I learned that "pocket" is not the same thing as "cushion." But I am still a big vague on pocket, yes.

quincie (quincie), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

"pocket" is the free space around the quarterback provided form him by his blockers. the better the blocking the bigger the pocket is or the longer it lasts. poor blocking leads to the pocket collapsing and the qb getting sacked.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

The pocket is a rare football event that occurs naturally and is the sublime culmination of perfect symmetry.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

I'm speaking as a Browns fan here.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

It's not exactly de facto, but once the QB has been "flushed out of the pocket", the offensive team is likely in jeopardy of losing yardage, committing a turnover. QBs that function well out of the pocket by being mobile, fast and versatile (McNabb + Vick being prime examples) are highly valued because of this.

This is a good thread, by the way.
It also brings up a good point: Any NYCers wanna get together to watch some pigskin one of these weekends?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

"It just seems like an awful big fuss over 10 yards, which does not seem like a whole hell of a lot. "

You will also come across many references to clubs success rate in the "red zone" meaning how effective they are at scoring touchdowns within their opponents 20 yard line. It gets harder for a team to pass within the last 20 yards, as there is less field to cover and on run plays the defensive backs are often playing up closer to the line.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Friday, 22 September 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)

Do teams still run sweeps using the "pulling guard"? I seem to remember seeing this quite a bit, but don't have any recollection of it now.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)

guards pull all the time in the NFL!

Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

Evidently I'm not paying attention.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

OK, someone care to explain the philosophical differences between the 3-4 and the 4-3? 3-4 is more about plugging up holes, right?

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

Not necessarily; the 3-4 can also be used to beef up pass rush; LBs have more freedom to rush or hang back, and coaches can stunt them on either side.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

(I tried ILx webmailing you, 'nym -- did it go through?)

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 22 September 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

speaking in very broad generalities, the 3-4 offers more flexibility to a defense. but it's also harder to find players to fit it. linebackers don't need to be as fast as their counterparts in the 4-3 but they do need to be heavier and/or stronger because they have to be able to shed the blocks of o-linemen since there is one fewer defensive lineman than there is in the 4-3. but the 3-4 makes the offense think on both run and pass blitzes, you know the 3 linemen are coming but where is the 4th man coming from? strong side? weak side? middle (and if so which one).

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 22 September 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

Plz explain me "blitz"

quincie (quincie), Friday, 22 September 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

pass blitz= sending more defenders to the qb in hopes of tackling him before he can get rid of the ball. plus side, it's a lot of pressure which could lead to getting hit and coughing up the ball and it also hurries the throw so that it's hopefully incomplete or intercepted.

the down side is that sending men to the qb means they aren't downfield defending against the pass. if the qb can find an open man and get it to him, odds are it's a big gain. or a mobile qb can get past the wave of defenders he has a lot of room because the remaining defenders are covering the receivers in the field. but most qbs are not particularly fast nor do they want to get hit.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

So does my team (Colts) do the blitzing thing or is this more like a Steeler move or something?

quincie (quincie), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

every team blitzes, some more than others. some more effectively than others but it's something every team does.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

the colts, recently, have not blitzed as much as some because they have/had a freak of nature in dwight freeney at defensive end. he is skilled enough where he generates a decent amount of pressure on the qb by himself so the colts would be content to send the four lineman after the qb and play what's known as a "cover two" defense. that's where the two safeties play deep and do not let anyone get past them downfield. the linebackers and cornerbacks are responsible for the area between the safeties and the d-line. by playing the cover two the colts are willing to allow shorter gains with the trade off of not giving up any big plays.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

oh, and yes, the steelers are very adept at blitzing and they do it often with great success.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

OK, the punt/kickoff thingy again:

On a punt, if no one on the receiving team touches the ball and the kicking team touches it, the ball goes to the receving team at the point where the kicking team touched it. It someone on the receiving team DOES touch it, then it's like a fumble. Whoever gets it gets it.

A touchback is OK on a kickoff, because most kickoff returns go past the 20-yard line so you're saving quite a few yards. On a punt, it's not so good because yes, that extra 10 yards can be important. And the difference between the 10 and the 20 is like a 10-yard punt return, which is a fairly significant return. Most returners can be held under that. Obviously, a punt downed inside the 10 is an even bigger difference.

A fair catch is a deal the punt returner makes with the kicking team: I won't run with the ball once I catch it, and you won't tear my head off. It's a decision the punt returner makes based on a split-second assessment of where the ball is and how close the head-off-tearers are. Sometimes a punt returner will signal for a fair catch and then not catch the ball, in fact run away from it. This is usually when he's near his own goal line and he's betting that the ball will roll into the end zone for a touchback. He signals for a fair catch as an insurance policy, because once he's signaled for a fair catch if the ball bounces crazily right into his hands, it's like a fair catch.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Sunday, 24 September 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

I did some football school with Ally this weekend! Was fun AND informative. More skool schduled for next week. Also: Colts, bitches!

quincie (quincie), Monday, 25 September 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 170,000 for manning oxygen tank. (0.19 seconds)

Jimmy Mod's Champion Erotic Fantasy Team 2006 (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 25 September 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.