Michael Lewis piece on the evolution of the left tackle in Sports Illustrated this week

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
it's fucking awesome. the type of thing that makes you think 'this must be why people still read si' until you remember that michael lewis sure as hell ain't si staff and the stuff by si staff like verducci's a-rod cover, anything rick reilly has written ever, etc is fucking awful. highly recommended - anyone know if lewis is writing a football book? another sports book has to be tempting him - moneyball still sells like crazy.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 22 September 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

The article is an excerpt, isn't it?

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

i've been meaning to read Moneyball! this sounds pretty kewl.

harbl (Adrian Langston), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

You'll be singing "The Ballad of Fat Catcher" like the rest of us.

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

ha - i HAD A HUNCH (it may well be noted in the article - i was drunk as fuck and launching a preemptive antihangover strike this morning when i read it). totally getting this for my dad this xmas and then very shortly thereafter borrowing it from him.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

I just read the article while I ate lunch. I MUST HAVE THIS BOOK.

The Bearnaise-Stain Bears (Rock Hardy), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

Mrs. Blount's Birthday:

http://www.guidautile.com/blog/img/simpson/Marge_palla_bowling.jpg

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 22 September 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

dr. z was killin' it this week with an article about the difference between run-blocking and pass-blocking linemen, and went on to say that there aren't really any guys who excel at both. he used jones and hutchinson as examples, with jones being a superhuman pass-blocker (and honestly i've never noticed any weakness in WJ's game, but i'll assume Z knows more than i do about it) and hutchinson being the all-pro run-blocker, which would at least explain why seattle's running game has gotten off to a slow start. two sections stood out to me:

You don't find the precision running games anymore, probably because in the free-agency era, offensive lines aren't together year after year like they used to be. I loved the intricate timing of the Giants' great power toss that carried them to their first Super Bowl victory in the 1986 season.

Joe Morris carrying behind the vicious down-blocks of Mark Bavaro, with Chris Godfrey pulling and Maurice Carthon leading. Man, it was beautiful. Then one day it was gone. I asked Bill Parcells about it.

"Yeah, I hated to lose it, too," he said. "But you can't coach it anymore. It takes up too much of your practice time."

annnd

How could the Raiders screw up their offensive line drafts so badly, especially Robert Gallery? Interesting thing about him. Tony Mandarich was the classic O-line bust, but the explanation was a little easier to understand. At Michigan State he was on the juice, the steroids, or so the rumor went. When he got off it in the NFL, poof, there went his strength. The only explanation I heard about Gallery was from Charley Casserly when he was Houston's GM. He said that Iowa offensive linemen fool you because they're so well-coached that technique outweighed natural ability, and that equation wouldn't work in the NFL.

harbl (Adrian Langston), Friday, 22 September 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/magazine/24football.html

His cover story about Ole Miss tackle Michael Oher in tomorrow' NYT magazine (also adapted from the book) is exceptional.

Coach Freeze recalls the moment he realized that Big Mike was not any ordinary giant: a football practice at which this new boy, who had just been admitted on academic probation, had no purpose. Big Mike just wandered onto the field, picked up a huge tackling dummy — the thing weighed at least 50 pounds — and took off with it at high speed. “Did you see that — did you see the way that kid moved?” Freeze asked another coach. “He ran with that dummy like it weighed nothing.” Freeze’s next thought was that he had misjudged the boy’s mass. No human being who moved that quickly could possibly weigh as much as 300 pounds. “That’s when I had them weigh him,” Freeze says. “One of the coaches took him into the gym and put him on the scale, but he overloaded the scale.” The team doctor drove him away and put him on what the Briarcrest coaches were later told was a cattle scale: 344 pounds, it read. On the light side, for a cow — delightfully beefy for a high-school sophomore. Especially one who could run. “I didn’t know whether he could play,” Freeze says now. “But I knew this: we didn’t have anyone like him on campus.”

For his first year it didn’t matter. He failed his classes and didn’t play anything. As far as the Briarcrest teachers could determine, he didn’t have a thought or a fact or an idea in his head. But then almost by accident they figured out that he needed to be tested orally, whereupon he proved to them that he deserved high D’s instead of low F’s. It wasn’t clear that he was going to acquire enough credits to graduate with his class, but Simpson and Graves stopped thinking they were going to send him back out on the streets, and they let him play sports. He joined the basketball team at the end of his sophomore year and soon afterward the track-and-field team (throwing the discus and putting the shot). In his junior year he finally got onto the football field.

The problem there, at first, resembled his problems in the classroom. He had no foundation, no idea what he was meant to do as a member of a team. He said he had played football his freshman year at Westwood, but there was no sign of it in his performance. When Freeze saw how fast he could move, he pegged him as a defensive tackle. And so for the first six games of the 2003 season, he played defense. He wasn’t any worse than his replacement, but he wasn’t much better either. One of his more talented teammates, Joseph Crone, thought Big Mike’s main contribution came before the game, when the opposing team stumbled out of its locker room or bus and took the measure of the Briarcrest Christian School. “They’d see all of us,” Crone says, “and then they’d see Mike and say, ‘Oh, God.”’

govern yourself accordingly (dayan), Saturday, 23 September 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

I'm looking forward to curling up with both these articles shortly. Good lookin' out!

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Saturday, 23 September 2006 17:07 (nineteen years ago)

Dang, that excerpt about Oher is even better than the one in SI. I told my wife about the SI one and she was up at 1:30 this morning reading it, and she hates sports.

The Bearnaise-Stain Bears (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 23 September 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

“The Mormons may be going to hell,” Sean says. “But they really are nice people.”

harbl (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 23 September 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)

Tabitha Soren is still quite the looker

zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Monday, 25 September 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)

i'm reading this now. lewis has a REALLY hard time relating to black people. the way he writes about oher and other "Blacks" is almost entirely anthropological, with him dimly wondering aloud why "they" don't think like him. i'm enjoying the book, but all of these moments are making me cringe. and let's not forget oher's white financial supporters, a husband who "doesn't know what race he is" and a wife who was brought up explicitly racist and talks about oher lovingly, but with the tone of "look at the beast." so so so weird.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 25 September 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

so what about the evolution of the left tackle? (keeping in mind that i'm not going to buy that magazine).

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 25 September 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)

basically how it became the second highest-paying position in all of football, after qb, and how it's all lt's fault.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 25 September 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

really i didn't know that about left takle - the question is why?

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 25 September 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)

because the left tackle protects the blind side of a righthanded qb

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 25 September 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

ho snap!

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 25 September 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

Diehl and Petitgout need to have their toothbrushes replaced with live grenades, by the way.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

the significance of left guard/left tackle becomes clearer to the novice (such as myself) when you are able to watch that side of your team's O-line fall completely the fuck apart and basically amount to the biggest contributors to losses, again and again and AGAIN and FUCKING AGAIN.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

Whoever could you mean?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

Has anybody here read Mike Freeman's Bloody Sundays?

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Thursday, 28 September 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

If your local NPR station carries Forum, Michael Lewis is on right now.

c('°c) (Leee), Thursday, 28 September 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not liking this book anymore. it's basically only a biography on oher. and these people who adopted him are AWFUL.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Thursday, 28 September 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

dat sux. the adoptive dad seems cool from that NYT excerpt though, at least for a conservative xtian business mogul.

Scott Fajita :( (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 28 September 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

yance you son of a bitch you're harshing my mellow

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 September 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

yeah tell more - they seemed ok. really went out of their way for dude.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 28 September 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.slate.com/media/75000/75314/000217_France1.jpg

zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Friday, 29 September 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

http://img.slate.com/media/75000/75314/000217_France2.jpg

zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Friday, 29 September 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

Streamable and downloadable alike: Forum talks with author Michael Lewis about his new book, "The Blind Side." Lewis's previous books include "The New New Thing" and "Money Ball."

c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 29 September 2006 15:22 (nineteen years ago)

four weeks pass...
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/sports/playmagazine/1029play_parcells.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

lewis wrote a profile of parcells... pretty dope

(9ò_ó)-o Q(^.^Q) (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 28 October 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)

So Michael Lewis is the best sportswriter in America then?

If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Saturday, 28 October 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

That article is outstanding. Holy cow. How did he get Parcells to talk to him so much?

polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 28 October 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://bestmessageboardever.com/board/style_images/1/folder_post_icons/icon27.gif

(9ò_ó)-o Q(^.^Q) (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 28 October 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

haha tony kornheiser or someone should refer to this book as 'jonathan ogden's book' a la joe morgan and moneyball.

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

My takeaway from that story and the cowboys' games that have followed it is that T.O.'s crazy egomania, or paranoid schizophrenia, or whatever it is that's wrong with that dude, is a more powerful negative force for the Cowboys than Parcells is able to counter.

SOME LOW END BRO (TOMBOT), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)

http://bestmessageboardever.com/uploads/post-52-1152199227.gif

mystery.gif (Adrian Langston), Monday, 30 October 2006 15:38 (nineteen years ago)

i started reading this article this morning. good subway ridin' story.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 30 October 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

I couldn't help but think about this last night. the 'boys not losing their shit when Carolina was up by 14 was pretty illustrative of everything dude talked about. also WTFFFFF @ parcells going all George Bailey afterwards? it was like an ep of MY SUPER SWEET SIXTEEN.

(9ò_ó)-o Q(^.^Q) (Adrian Langston), Monday, 30 October 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

“As you get older,” he says, pointing to a screen, where the play is frozen, “your needs diminish. They don’t increase. They diminish. I need less money. I need less sex. But this — this doesn’t change.”

I didn't really want to know about him needing any sex at all, eww, etc. But it's pretty good insight.

Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Monday, 30 October 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

YOUR KISSING NEEDS INCREASE

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 October 2006 19:53 (nineteen years ago)

THAT AIN'T BULLSHIT

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 30 October 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
I pretty much totally disagree with Jams' assessment of it. I thought it was awesome.

DOCTOR METH KING (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

I thought in its own way it handled the self-reinforcing segregation of class and race in this country better than a lot of books purported to be specifically about that subject - the stories about Hurt Village, and the kids there, he doesn't gloss over anything, and he isn't painting any rosy pictures of the situation Oher's leaving behind, or the kids still stuck there.

Unless you just want to hate well-off white churchgoers in the South for the intrinsic qualities I just gave, I can't see why you would have a problem with the Tuohys. They aren't even "old money." And Leigh Anne rules. "Quentin that's your business and you do what you like, but if Michael ever does that I'm going to cut his penis off."

And even if you skip every chapter about Memphis and Oher, you still get your money's worth from all the stuff about Walsh, Parcells, that dude Lemmings, Jonathan Ogden, Jon Ayers, LT, and the first chapter, which is the best version of Joe Theismann's Forced Retirement I've ever heard or seen.

Also did you guys know that this book never would have been written if it weren't for TABITHA SOREN???? WAHT.

DOCTOR METH KING (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

that's the dude's wife.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

yes but he just sez his wife convinced him to write it in the Acknowledgements. he does not say "Tabitha Soren, whom many of you may remember from MTV NEWS, convinced me to write this book about Michael Oher." That, I had to do some digging to find out.

DOCTOR METH KING (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

haha i wonder if she convinced him to write it when she thought 'omg moneyball sold so much - honey write a book about football, I WANT A MINK COAT!'

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

women be golddiggin'!

Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

glad to see you liked it tombot, that yance verdict had me hesitating.

ally it's totally true though! you've seen eddie murphy: raw! science!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
So I finally read the book, and Y4ncey's totally OTM. Ultimately, the first third (the history/evolution of the left tackle) is a great read, but the Oher story left me feeling really uncomfortable. Oher's foster parents end up being the biggest Ole Miss boosters ever, you get the sense that Oher himself had virtually no say in where he went to college (though the recruiting stuff with Nick Saban is kinda roffleworthy), and the entire thing comes off way more subjective and exploitative than Lewis is willing to let on.

Maybe Oher actually did "[change] the Tuohys as much as they have changed him," but I can't help thinking that they really took advantage of him along the way. Lewis is usually pretty insightful and reasonable when he writes about sports, but I think his issues with class are as damaging to this book as his issues with race; he never really questions the motivations of his old prep school buddy, even though they're pretty glaring if you know anything about booster culture.

govern yourself accordingly (dayan), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

I can see part of your point, but I suspect being exploited by ole miss boosters is hardly the worst thing that could have happened to michael oher

TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

He's lucky that he was fast and strong enough to merit adoption!

polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
i finally read this btw. I thought it was pretty awesome, though it was funny how it starts out convincing you that the Tuoheys are the greatest humanitarians ever, and then halfway through is like "oh uh btw they went to Ole Miss". i'm not really bothered by oher being exploited though, i mean whatever dude he could have it worse. the tuoheys seem like some rich fundamentalist xtians that i could chill with. anyway i'm gonna try to watch some ole miss games next year and see what he's like.

bill walsh: kind of a douche?

cankles, Friday, 2 March 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

BILL WALSH, DOUCHEBOWSKI GENIUS

TOMBOT, Friday, 2 March 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

Bill Walsh comes off as a total douche in the America's Games that involve his 49ers. like more-fascist-than-thou in comparison with every other NFL head coach.

horseshoe, Friday, 2 March 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)

i have to say, i love the precedent set by cowher and dungy as far as non-douchebaggy coaches who don't ignore their families winning the big one. fuk u, gruden & belichick!

cankles, Friday, 2 March 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)

belichick's dad and kids were like all over him constantly though! his pops walked the sideline with him all 3 SBs, didn't he?

TOMBOT, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

eight months pass...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/sports/playmagazine/28lewis.html?_r=2&ref=playmagazine&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

awesome lewis article abt kickers~~~

cankles, Friday, 2 November 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

nine months pass...
one year passes...

guys...

http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/theblindside/
http://www.theblindsidemovie.com/

what the fuck.

candice spergin (cankles), Friday, 18 September 2009 09:04 (sixteen years ago)

http://images.apple.com/moviesxml/s/wb/posters/theblindside_l200909111110.jpg

candice spergin (cankles), Friday, 18 September 2009 09:10 (sixteen years ago)

Guessing this movie will NOT start with footage of LT creaming Theismann.

Alex in SF, Friday, 18 September 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

omg thank god you're back ade :D

horseshoe, Friday, 18 September 2009 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

:3

>:3

candice spergin (cankles), Friday, 18 September 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

my bother and i were dying @ this trailer last night

the rap battle of algiernod (k3vin k.), Sunday, 4 October 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

I'm about halfway through this and it's really good a football neophyte like me; though I do think that Lewis overextends himself and uses some narrative techniques which just. don't. work.

dyao, Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)

don't really get the hate upthread for the Tuohys; sure they're fundie church goers from the South, but it's not like they went trawling through Memphis ghettoes searching for kids with athletic potential whom they can exploit and package and send off to Ole Miss

by the way, there should be a 'for' somewhere in the above post

dyao, Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:26 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.