The 2007 NFL Playoffs Thread

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Who will emerge from round 1? Will Rex Grossman get out of Soldier Field alive if he fucks up against whichever low-seeded team plays the Bears? Will Larry Johnson pause to rape each Colts defensive player on his way to the end zone while scoring his 7 TDs?

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 00:33 (eighteen years ago)

hello!

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 4 January 2007 01:21 (eighteen years ago)

Given that Herm's been cornholing LJ all year, I don't know if he'll be able to muster more than a drive-by shocker.

― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 4 January 2007 03:04 (eighteen years ago)

REX GROSSMAN SHOULD BE SOLD TO WOLFES FOR FOOD. FUCK HIM AND HIS EYEBROWS.

PS STILL NOT TOM ;_;

― TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Thursday, 4 January 2007 05:46 (eighteen years ago)

he's the martin gramatica of qbs ; (

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 06:12 (eighteen years ago)

He's not a Grossman, he's a gross, MAN

― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 4 January 2007 06:16 (eighteen years ago)

January 1, 2007 -- NOT only did Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo never date buxom blonde Jessica Simpson - they never even met. Sources say rumors of Romo and Simpson's fling were the work of Jessica's manager daddy, Joe Simpson, who "lent her name out to Romo in exchange for game tickets." But Jessica's publicist, Cindi Berger, said talk of Joe selling out his daughter is "totally false" and that Romo, who's reportedly dating Carrie Underwood , simply mentioned once that he wanted to meet Jessica. A rep for the Cowboys did not return calls.

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 06:22 (eighteen years ago)

As I said in September, Bolts v. Bears.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 January 2007 07:20 (eighteen years ago)

i dont see how the bears could make it to the superbowl.

my picks this weekend:
philly
seattle
indy (they wont lose at home, sorry)
new england

― t0dd swiss (immobilisme), Thursday, 4 January 2007 08:08 (eighteen years ago)

indy is going to lose at home.
the jets will not beat the pats. if the pats lose it will be due to them shooting themselves in the nuts.
seattle/dallas could be the first game ever where both teams find a way to lose.
the giants should steamroll the iggles, but then again there's the coughlin factor where i think the gints would roll over and play dead against the william & mary jv's if the players thought it would get the coach out of their hair next year.

― otto midnight (otto midnight), Thursday, 4 January 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

^^^^^^^^^ all of this is OTM except for the Indy thing, that game is a toss up depending almost entirely if Regular Season Peyton or Playoffs Peyton shows up.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

MANGINA DENTATA BITCHZ

― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

I am really looking forward to the pats shooting themselves in the nuts now

― TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Thursday, 4 January 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

yes, pats please shoot selves in nuts!

so none of you guys think the Saints are going to the SB?

― horseshoe (horseshoe), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

It's possible, more possible, I think, than the Bears doing it.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, I think so, too. Chicago had a really soft regular season schedule. and I really want the Saints in the Super Bowl because then it will be 50% more likely to be fun to watch. also my weird, embarrassing Sean Payton fixation.

― horseshoe (horseshoe), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

i think the jets will not only leave the field defeated but also demoralized. i don't think the bears really have a chance. i see them losing to the giants at solider field.

i can remember before i moved to chicago changing from the orange line to the green line at roosevelt after flying in to midway and being legitimately impressed by the sight of solider field lit up at night. now it looks like someone took a giant dump on it.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Soldier Field is surreally ridiculous-looking.

I think my whole trying to be a Bears fan thing would have taken better if it weren't for Grossman.

― horseshoe (horseshoe), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

I think the Saints will go Super bowling. They might get freaked out by their success once they get there and muff the game, but I think they'll get there. In the meantime, I'm picking all home teams this weekend.

― Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

eagles over bears

― TOMB07 (TOMBOT), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

I wouldn't even be able to watch that game on the basis of how ugly those two QBs are. I'd have to boycott.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:59 (eighteen years ago)

I think my whole trying to be a Bears fan thing would have taken better if it weren't for Grossman.

uhmmmmmm..... last year's kyle orton experience almost turned me off pro football. i'll never be a bears fan but i suppose i'll root for them as long as they aren't playing the pats.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Thursday, 4 January 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

After rooting for Boise State I need a team with decent uni's to cheer for and I choose the chets.

Dallas vs Seattle is the game to avoid watching at all costs.

― lk (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 4 January 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)

so none of you guys think the Saints are going to the SB?

I think they could, but if they do I wouldn't have been right in September, so.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 January 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

I wouldn't mind seeing Jeff Garcia win the stupor bowl coz then he could be like lol TO and Brownes etc.

― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

But go saintes and my boy R3gg!3 Bu5h

― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

That would be some bullshit to pull on poor Donovan McNabb.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

he should have told his moms to shut the fuck up then!

― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

after lookin @ seattle's injury list (starting linebacker, cornerbacks, guards and wide receivers all out) i have to give the edge to dallas :'(

i have A FEELING ABOUT INDY dudes. also i know we r bagging on the nfc a lot, but the fact that KC and the nu york jets are in the playoffs speaks ill of the AFC imo!!!!!!!!! chicago's fucked not b/c of grossman (ok it's because of grossman) but because of all the injured dudes on defense.

― SEACREST OUT OF IRAQ! (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

i think the bears should bring back kordell stewart for the playoffs

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

dude can do it alllll!

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

Seattle will basically consist of only Hasselbeck and Alexander for the game, but Tony Romo has been finding a lot of new and unusual ways to fumble recently so who knows.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

tony romo is thinking about underwood tittays too much. he's getting so annoying i sort of hope the dude turns into mike tomczak

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

oh and rodney harrison out for postseason = lmbo @ pats. i wonder if he's actually a liability at this point due to being a marked man. i sort of wish belichick nothing but ill rn.

― SEACREST OUT OF IRAQ! (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 4 January 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

Romo is a douche, he seems "dumber than a bag of hammers" if you ask me. His eyes are dull little cow eyes, he was all psyched off the bench but now you see the true ProBowler that is Tony Romo, jackass who was a benchwarmer for a reason.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)

tony romo is just jake plummer with a bigger smirk and famous girlfriends.

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)

I would rather have Seneca Wallace or Damon Huard or Billy Volek at quarterback than Romo.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)

Whoa?

― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)

Tony Romo as Jake Plummer OTM. The Billy Volek and Damon Huard thing is a step too far though.

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)

the plummer thing is the same too because it was all about this head coach saying, 'screw what we got, i can turn this turd into a diamond! just you watch!'

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)

I'm beginning to think every coach a demented puppet master.

― lk (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

l-r Cutler, Shanahan

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000CR76U8.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

― lk (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)

I just saw Drew Brees at my work! I hope too many days off don't make the Saints rusty.

I hate Tony Romo too.

― pj (Henry), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

are you sean payton?

― lk (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

LOL

― Allyzay Eisenschefter Pop You To The Extreme (allyzay), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

the plummer thing is the same too because it was all about this head coach saying, 'screw what we got, i can turn this turd into a diamond! just you watch!'

But that turd was a high first round pick. I mean, he may or may not be a turd. I agree with the basic premise that Plummer is unlikely to get to or win a super bowl.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

The Billy Volek and Damon Huard thing is a step too far though.

Yeah probably but I'm tired looking at Romo's smug mug.

― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

are you sean payton?
No, he was shopping with his wife and he looked like a typical husband, all shruggy like he didn't feel like being there. I was hoping he'd have her "go long" and he'd throw her a head of lettuce or something.

― pj (Henry), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

what i hate the most about romo is when he completes a pass and instead of just getting downfield and moving on or even doing something 'aw he's a big kid!' like favre pumping his fist, he smirks and giggles and high fives everybody. totally punchable.

― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

man i hope the saints go to teh sb.

― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 4 January 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

Skipping 852 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

http://dailybeacon.utk.edu/printarticle.php?articleid=30753

― TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

Group members say the society meets in secret to discuss ideas, but makes no decisions affecting UT.

wait wait wait... a group of college kids get together for idle chatter? STOP THE PRESSES!!!

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

I KNOW RITE

― TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

briggs and rosie would TEAR SHIT UP. and yeah, tully's just too damn slow, s'why they had alexander on the field for most of the game. vrabel needs to be phased out of starting duty.

i think kraft in particular would've loved to keep a ton of guys as pats for life - milloy, vinatieri, mcginest - and if there wasn't a salary cap he would've paid out the ass to do so. i think the pats-are-sofa-king-cheap meme is a tiny bit overstated, i mean they paid rodney more than anyone in the league wanted to by a significant margin. i'm getting more and more nervous about asante samuel though. maybe he's overperforming cuz it's a contract year, but C'MON. the d-line is probz the best in the league, except maybe for san diego, and they're ALL YOUNG. seymour's your oldest guy and he's just entering his prime. that's something to be super stoked about. hobbs has been awesome. there's a lot of young talent there.

(haha i'm doing exactly what i hate the most abt pats fans now, where they act like everyone cares about the minutiae of their team and that dan koppen getting an extension is news that everyone needs to know and that every new fourth-string role player is another cog in the brilliant belichickian machine and blah blah bloo bloo)

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

Tom, I'm glad someone else at UTK has taken up your paranoid ramblings for future generations to come.

xpost dude the pats are still pretty well under the salary cap. I mean, they're not in Eagles territory but they aren't exactly the Falcons either (btw wtf do the Falcons spend all that money on?).

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

Kirkland, Carmack win close vote
Knight Stivender - Staff Writer
Friday, April 11, 1997 issue
Click here to print
Hawkeye's erupted last night as Tennessee Now members learned their party had swept the top SGA seats of president and vice president.
James Kirkland and Tausha Carmack are the new leaders of the undergraduate student body.
Kirkland won the presidency with 1,534 votes to Student Voice presidential candidate Travis Wright's 1,258.

Party of Darkness presidential hopeful Tom Millar took third place with 120 votes, and 30 voters wrote in Peyton Manning, giving the quarterback fourth place.

― TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

ally - peerless price.

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

vrabel needs to be phased out of starting duty.

no, they need to keep vrabel inside at this point. i think he could take on the role roman phifer had as the veteran who's lost a step (or 10) but still gets by on experience or intuition or whatever you want to call it.

unless i missed an extension i think richard seymour's contract is up this year too.

i think the pats-are-sofa-king-cheap meme is a tiny bit overstated, i mean they paid rodney more than anyone in the league wanted to by a significant margin

yeah, i know they'll pay for talent, look at the contract they put down for rosey colvin. but i think briggs is such a dominant player someone will greatly overpay for his services. and that's one thing i don't expect from belicheck and pioli.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha peerless price

I would've voted for Peyton in that race :P

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

seriously he's still taking up like 10 million in space. i don't think his cap hit is off the books until next year. also i don't understand cap shit that well but i think the pats' situation is a little misunderstood, cf. this bit from the blobe (i meant to type globe but blobe makes sense too) last week:

And as for the millions in cap space, I’ve been doing some research on this area and believe I’ve uncovered some interesting information in regards to the team’s cap spending that sheds a little bit of a different light on things. Because the team had such high cash spending the previous two years — with the top-level Tom Brady and Richard Seymour deals leading the way — the Patriots project to be one of a handful of teams who will actually be penalized by the league as part of the new CBA, and I believe will lose some cap space in a future season (possibly 2007) because of that. The Colts are also part of the small handful of teams who I think will be penalized; it’s sort of like the luxury tax in baseball. I believe the Patriots would do a service to their fans by explaining this intricacy of the salary cap — assuming I have it correct — because I sense there is a perception out there that the team is not spending compared to other teams. In actuality, they’ve spent to a level that is actually going to penalize them.

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

a dominant LB is also worth less than a dominant, say, QB or DL.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6378468

The defining player of Patriots coach Bill Belichick's career is Lawrence Taylor, the outside linebacker he coached when he was on Bill Parcells' staff with the New York Giants. Belichick learned with the Giants that players like Taylor, who truly changed the game, are so rare that they're worth every penny a team spends on them. Belichick has decided with this group of Patriots that two such players exist, quarterback Tom Brady and defensive lineman Richard Seymour, and then he's found a second tier of players who — while they haven't earned the kind of money Brady and Seymour have — got bigger paychecks in New England than they would have received elsewhere. New England even gave lineman Billy Yates a $400,000 salary, making him the highest-paid practice squad player in league history.

maybe we should make an all-purpose pats/massholes thread to spare everyone else

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)

That's weird and doesn't make very good sense, I've not heard of that before. I know that they DIDN'T have as much room under the salary cap a few years ago because of a couple of those deals, and the way the contracts were structured is part of why they DO have so much space now, but I'd never heard of this at all??? As long as they were under the salary cap, why would they be penalized?

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.toadking.com/6x9=42/itisamystery.gif

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

I take it all back, the Eagles are the smartest team in the league.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

who wrote that article from the globe? was it michael reiss? because his column is on-line only and, apparently, has not vetting process because it's always filled with corrections, retractions, and clarifications.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

yeah it reiss, i think it was actually just a mailbag column or some shit.

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

then i'll give it a week before i believe it. he has spread more incorrect information regarding the cap in general and the pats cap in particular that i'm surprised he still draws a paycheck.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:10 (eighteen years ago)

well he kind of admits that it's probably all in his head, i just thought it was an interesting wrinkle. i'm sure he doesn't know shit about shit.

― aidsy (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:20 (eighteen years ago)

He is no Adam Schefter.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

well that's kind of unfair, Adam Schefter controls the information age

― TOMBO7 (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

Just three days ago he was saying that Bill Parcells was staying on as the Cowboys coach, though. SOME INFORMATION AGE.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

he was the person of 2006, he's totally lost in this crazy world he didn't create of 2007

― say it with blood diamonds (a_p), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

http://images.nfl.com/photos/img9947907.jpg
^^^^^^^^^ ok did not know there was ANOTHER hilarious man in this pic

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

i think rex is way cuter than peyton

― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

That's crazy.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

i think joe torre is cuter than peyton.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

OK now THAT is crazy.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

Joe Torre is like the one coach/manager/#1 guy type guy who looks more evil and sleep/sun/food deprived than Belichick.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

sexy rexy!

― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

I thought the nickname was supposed to be ironic, like, um, Broadway Joe.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

torre looks like the kind of guy who if you told me he blew out a knee in 1964 and became an enforcer for the mob instead of a baseball player, i would have no problems believing you.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

But that doesn't make a guy very cute.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

yes, which makes my opinion of peyton that much more evident.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)

But no less crazy.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

what madness is this? Rex Grossman is profoundly unattractive. Joe Torre? Look, I know he doesn't have a buttchin or fifteen bodies in the basement, but Peyton Manning is adorable.

― horseshoe (horseshoe), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

This is yet another example of dudes all lovefesting on totally unattractive-to-ladies dudes, it happens all the time. It is kind of profound, sometimes.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

are you honestly saying that given the chance, no strings attached, if it were somehow ok with your spouse/sig other, that you would not take to bed and ravish joe torre?

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

Is he going to pay me?

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:55 (eighteen years ago)

Don Zimmer brings teh hotttness

― lk (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)

joey ramone.

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, well rex was pretty awful looking in college with bad haircuts and all, but now he's just so adorable i want to pinch his cheeks!

― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

I suppose technically he's not the worst looking person ever but eyebrows! also, he looks so dim.

― horseshoe (horseshoe), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

He has the fattest face I've ever seen on a thin man.

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:16 (eighteen years ago)

http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/new/bracket_guest.jpg

― roger goodell (gear), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)

agaghaignobaogh no no do not want

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c97/effyoutoo/heroes.jpg

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 22:57 (eighteen years ago)

http://blogs.trb.com/news/weather/weblog/wgnweather/CSL012407.jpg

― chicago kevin (chicago kevin), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

Are they going to put another headband around the Picasso statue?

― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/9513/27455398pn3.jpg
-- fuck yr face blogger (a|e...), February 5th, 2007 4:15 PM. (a_p) (later) (link)

The gift that keeps on giving...

― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 5 February 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)

that is just the best

― Allyzay doesnt get into the monkeys or vindications (allyzay), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.