Detroit at DallasCarolina at ChicagoBuffalo at CincinnatiTennessee at ClevelandMinnesota at Kansas CityWashington at St. LouisNew Orleans at JacksonvillePittsburgh at HoustonSan Francisco at PhiladelphiaNY Giants at ArizonaAtlanta at SeattleMiami at San DiegoNew England at OaklandDenver at Green BayNY Jets at BaltimoreIndianapolis at Tampa Bay
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 06:54 (fourteen years ago)
Detroit at Dallas-- Lions Carolina at Chicago --BearsBuffalo at Cincinnati--BillsTennessee at Cleveland --BrownsMinnesota at Kansas City --VIkingsWashington at St. Louis -- RamsNew Orleans at Jacksonville-- SaintsPittsburgh at Houston-- TexansSan Francisco at Philadelphia --49ersNY Giants at Arizona --GiantsAtlanta at Seattle-- FalconsMiami at San Diego-- ChargersNew England at Oakland-- RaidersDenver at Green Bay--PackersNY Jets at Baltimore--RavensIndianapolis at Tampa Bay-- Buccaneers
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 08:00 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/XZWSv.jpg
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 11:41 (fourteen years ago)
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 11:43 (fourteen years ago)
29-19 on the year
Detroit at Dallas-- LionsCarolina at Chicago --BearsBuffalo at Cincinnati--BillsTennessee at Cleveland --BrownsMinnesota at Kansas City --VIkingsWashington at St. Louis -- RamsNew Orleans at Jacksonville-- SaintsPittsburgh at Houston-- TexansSan Francisco at Philadelphia --PhiNY Giants at Arizona --GiantsAtlanta at Seattle-- FalconsMiami at San Diego-- ChargersNew England at Oakland-- RaidersDenver at Green Bay--PackersNY Jets at Baltimore--RavensIndianapolis at Tampa Bay-- Buccaneers <--- is this really Monday?
― Waxahachie Swap (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 12:45 (fourteen years ago)
i'm like dante hall / i just throw up the x
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
shots! shots! shots! shots! shots! shots! shots! shots!
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/jason-taylor-chad-henne-is-more-talented-than-mark-sanchez/
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:36 (fourteen years ago)
wow, what a ringing endorsement!
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:45 (fourteen years ago)
well tbf, mark sanchez has won two super bowls
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:47 (fourteen years ago)
10-6 last wk; 34-14 on the season
Detroit at Dallas-- DallasCarolina at Chicago --BearsBuffalo at Cincinnati--BillsTennessee at Cleveland --TitansMinnesota at Kansas City --vikingsWashington at St. Louis -- skinsNew Orleans at Jacksonville-- SaintsPittsburgh at Houston-- pittSan Francisco at Philadelphia --eaglesNY Giants at Arizona --GiantsAtlanta at Seattle-- FalconsMiami at San Diego-- ChargersNew England at Oakland-- PatsDenver at Green Bay--PackersNY Jets at Baltimore--JetsIndianapolis at Tampa Bay-- Buccaneers
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
8 and 8 (yuck) last week, 30-18 overall
Detroit at Dallas - Lions, Romo may dieCarolina at Chicago - Bears should be up and angry for this; it's a major gut checkBuffalo at Cincinnati - GO FITZTennessee at Cleveland - Tennessee but not with any joyMinnesota at Kansas City - minnesota in the BATTLE OF THE 0zWashington at St. Louis - Still think the skins are better than they lookNew Orleans at Jacksonville - New Orleans should really light up the board herePittsburgh at Houston - Houston in a minor upsetSan Francisco at Philadelphia - Iggles even with Gregor Samsa at QBNY Giants at Arizona - Cardinals; the giants seemed lucky to me this weekAtlanta at Seattle - Picking Falcons as my survival choiceMiami at San Diego - ChargersNew England at Oakland - Pats but this should be a solid scrappy gameDenver at Green Bay - THE BELTNY Jets at Baltimore - Ravens but I'm really unsure about thisIndianapolis at Tampa Bay - bucs over cololts
― Dudley Daigle: Tugboat Captain (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 22:04 (fourteen years ago)
http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls5rzjTPrl1qzjykfo1_400.png
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 22:21 (fourteen years ago)
so is it time for us to just accept that Ryan Fitzpatrick is awesome?
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 00:30 (fourteen years ago)
im not entirely convinced its that time yet
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 01:01 (fourteen years ago)
yeah awesome is a major stretch right now
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 01:45 (fourteen years ago)
"better than chad henne" is appropriate, tho.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 28 September 2011 01:48 (fourteen years ago)
Detroit at Dallas - Lions Carolina at Chicago - Bears Bears BearsBuffalo at Cincinnati - BiiiiiillsTennessee at Cleveland - BrownsMinnesota at Kansas City - CHIEFZWashington at St. Louis - SkinsNew Orleans at Jacksonville - SaintsPittsburgh at Houston - TexansSan Francisco at Philadelphia - EaglesNY Giants at Arizona - CardsAtlanta at Seattle - FalconsMiami at San Diego - ChargersNew England at Oakland - PATSDenver at Green Bay - PackNY Jets at Baltimore - RavensIndianapolis at Tampa Bay - Bucs
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 02:55 (fourteen years ago)
y'know, these threads would be way more exciting if we actually guessed on the lines. like is anyone seriously taking Jax here?
my picks:
Dallas -1.5Saints -8Skins pkBrowns -1Bills -4.5Vikings -3Panthers +6.5Steelers +4Falcons -5.5Giants -3Dolphins +7Packers -13 (in reality I never really gamble on such a big line, but I can see this game being total disaster for Denver)Pats -6Jets +3.5Colts +10
IRL I am almost definitely taking that Steelers line, plus I think I'm gonna tease the Lions to +7.5 and the Saints to -2
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 03:06 (fourteen years ago)
also just teased 6.5 for Saints -1.5 and Tennessee +7.5, seems like a real solid bet
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 03:08 (fourteen years ago)
I actually would go with Denver +13. +13 is a loooot.
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 04:02 (fourteen years ago)
bets I've made so far are Lions +1 and Vikings -1.5
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 04:06 (fourteen years ago)
get your parlay card ready
Lions +1.5Saints -8Rams pk (surprised this is a pickem)Browns -1 Bills -4.5Vikings -3Bears -6.5Texans -4 (texans pendulum swings back to a win this week)Falcons -5.5Giants -3Dolphins +7Broncos +13Raiders +6Ravens -3.5 Colts +10
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 04:16 (fourteen years ago)
I went 12-4 in my pool this week and now I'm feeling stressed about next week...fuck...feel like Cincinnati's gonna upset the Bills but what a stupid pick that looks like...damn...pressure getting to me
― pathos of the unwarranted encore (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 04:23 (fourteen years ago)
Matt where'd you get Vikes -1.5?As for the Pack/Broncos game, betting on lines that are like 12+ points is really difficult since a lot of these games can feature a team that's not really trying to score in the 4th quarter, I've been burned before w/ garbage time touchdowns and it really sucks. Obviously if New England's involved you don't really have to worry. But I don't see any advantage Denver has in this matchup, and the Pack's playing at home to boot, I can really see this game being like 14-0 after 8 minutes.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:09 (fourteen years ago)
guys i'm going to gently suggest that you make a football gambling thread if you see this being a regular conversation?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:14 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, the rest of us non-degenerates have no interest in it
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:21 (fourteen years ago)
no interest? don't you think debating whether the Packers will win by 14 or more is more interesting than "yes, I think Green Bay will win this one"? the truth about pick 'em polls is that it's very hard to outperform a guy who's always picking the team with the best record over a full season.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:31 (fourteen years ago)
I actually don't understand what the gambling stuff means - point spread etc. I could Google it and learn obvs but the reason why I don't is that I also don't careThat said it doesn't bother me any if you talk about it
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:26 (fourteen years ago)
It's easy, taking Chicago -6.5 means you are betting that Chicago wins by 6.5 or more (their score minus 6.5), while Carolina +6.5 means you are taking their score plus that many points. So if you had Carolina and the score was Bears 27, Panthers 24, you'd still win
I only really bring it up because I think just picking the winner is useless as pretty much everyone's going to pick the Bears, or any other team that's favored by like 5 or more, so I predict everyone's going to have the same picks for like half these matches
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:34 (fourteen years ago)
well for one thing a lot of us participate in a yahoo pick'em group that uses confidence points so it's not just like things are endlessly tied. also if you actually read folk's picks closely it is interesting to see who has different ideas about some of the key games.
imo spreads aren't interesting because they say a lot less about football than they do about how ppl will spend their gambling money. but i know it's the kind of thing some ppl enjoy going on and on about which i why i was saying it's a perfectly valid thread topic.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:39 (fourteen years ago)
your example is kind of weird too--granted the bears are at home but they kind of suck--carolina is a perfectly reasonable upset pick there.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:41 (fourteen years ago)
I'm not sure on exact odds but I think 6.5 points is roughly 2:1 when it comes to pick'em, sure you might think Carolina can upset them (Fins could upset SD as well), but if I offer $10 for guessing the winner, is anyone actually picking Carolina there? I don't want to get into hardcore math or talk about standard deviations here, but the Vegas line is extremely unlikely to ever be "off" more than 2 or 3 points, so if all you care about is getting picks right, you'd have to be insane to pick Carolina. Just because they're associated with gambling doesn't mean this has to be gambling talk, IMO they say a lot more about football than a simple pick'em does
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:47 (fourteen years ago)
yeah but your premise is flawed because there's no money involved here--just the pride that comes from picking the games right! there's a nice little feeling from picking an upset that most folks missed.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 14:51 (fourteen years ago)
I actually don't understand what the gambling stuff means - point spread etc. I could Google it and learn obvs but the reason why I don't is that I also don't care
^ this
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 17:11 (fourteen years ago)
i dont care about the weekly picks either, its just a way to jumpstart discussion for the week's games
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
I understand spreads but don't care about them.
I stopped doing picks because I am relentlessly bad at them.
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 17:38 (fourteen years ago)
everyone otm -- start a new thread
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:31 (fourteen years ago)
so two week 4 threads? that's stupidfor the record, I also think the Packers and Saints will win this week.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
you could just make it an rolling gambling on nfl thread.
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)
no, man -- just "football point spreads 2011" or some shit
if it's only like 2 or 3 ppl posting you guys won't need a new thread every week
we start new general threads every week bcuz every single one is like 900 posts
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:45 (fourteen years ago)
i mean i pretty much don't start reading these threads until the end of the week bcuz i don't care about ppl's picks but the thread is also updated infrequnetly enough that it's not a huge deal
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:46 (fourteen years ago)
yeah during the midweek this thread is more for breaking news and general nfl vibin
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:48 (fourteen years ago)
I don't really want to talk about gambling, I want to actually discuss who's favored and who's being under/overvalued. I'm not saying that everyone should be guessing on point spreads but I don't understand the uproar when a couple of us do it..?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
ummm discussing what the spreads are have to be included in this, don't they? or do we really not care that much about who is likely to win the games?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 18:55 (fourteen years ago)
there was no uproar--it was a gentle suggestion.
to repeat, my sense is that a lot of ppl here are not interested in point spreads, as a vehicle for gambling or otherwise. i have no issue if a few folks do want to chat about those things, and i think a rolling point spread thread would probably foster that discussion and let yall get pretty deep into it.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
the only spreads I want to talk about are the spread offense and sometimes cheese
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:07 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.footballtimes.org/AdvHTML_Upload/Spread60.gif
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
http://pinchmysalt.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/img_0844-version-2.jpg
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
that's cheese? looks like cinnamon malted babyshit to me
― banana mogul (goole), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)
There is pumpkin in there too for some reason.
People are animals.
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
well brackett and bullit were essentially their only other talented defensive players so yeah
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 01:55 (fourteen years ago)
seriously how is there not a running SNL sketch of chucky quotes that sound really, really wrong
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:01 (fourteen years ago)
i realized that this game is just kind of a lose-lose for everyone -- the only thing more smh than curtis painter is the bucs allowing curtis painter to throw the longest td pass in colts history
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:06 (fourteen years ago)
fire the entire indy defense except freeney and mathis, i guess.
― horseshoe, Tuesday, October 4, 2011 1:53 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark
nah man Angerer rules
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:07 (fourteen years ago)
i think chucky/jaws put their mics on mute and are just swearing constantly at both teams
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:08 (fourteen years ago)
memo to the bucs: it appears as if you are losing the 2011 colts? plz remedy.
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:08 (fourteen years ago)
angerer might be decent but i'm not sold yet
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:09 (fourteen years ago)
my standards for linebacking are pretty low, as a Raiders fan...
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
stupid unnecessary roughness call
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
oh dear god that is horrible
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:12 (fourteen years ago)
i didn't see it
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:13 (fourteen years ago)
RIP career
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:13 (fourteen years ago)
that bad?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
i was on the can, who got hurt
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
worst thing I've seen since Shaun Livingston's knee injury.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
eric foster
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
eric foster shattered his lower leg
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
seymour really needed to throw up the X before that play
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
he fell back with his ankle cracked out to the side at a 45 degree angle
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
should i rewind my DVR y/n
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
yeah do it
weirdly euphemistic discussion of what injuries mean to football players
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
ugh i'm really glad i didn't see it
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:17 (fourteen years ago)
really torn up by foster's teammate crying
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:17 (fourteen years ago)
http://gif.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/FOSTER-ANKLE.gif
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:17 (fourteen years ago)
not watching that
of course, football is so violent it's only a matter of time until we see a guy break his neck on national television
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
well that's happened before so
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:22 (fourteen years ago)
more like before someone dies
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:22 (fourteen years ago)
yeah. it'll probably be something totally unexpected, like not a QB or skill player getting hit in the head or one of the defensive backs using his helmet as a weapon. or maybe it will be exactly what you'd think? i was about to write that i don't watch the game because of the violence but on the other hand, isn't washington that much better when receivers worry about landry if they run across the defense..
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:33 (fourteen years ago)
i don't like the fact that blount is so one-dimensional but it's a hell of a dimension
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
chris berman should be loaded into a trebuchet and launched into a wall made of swords
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)
anything in particular or just the usual?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 02:55 (fourteen years ago)
looooooooool @ bucs secondary
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:04 (fourteen years ago)
awesome blocking!
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:04 (fourteen years ago)
smgdh
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:05 (fourteen years ago)
yessirso awesome the first time around i didn't even see wayne go by. nice
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:05 (fourteen years ago)
what a sexy play
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:17 (fourteen years ago)
ugh, this is so one of my pet peeves
when your BACK UP QUARTERBACK comes in, you're not running the wildcat. you've put in your back up quarterback, who is now going to run the ball.
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:17 (fourteen years ago)
bucs training facility is hilarious. i thought it couldn't get any cornier than that giant pirate ship but no..
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:21 (fourteen years ago)
yeah it wasn't a wildcat it was an option xp
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:21 (fourteen years ago)
Earlier I saw Blount trying to calm down an angry teammate and I was like "awwww"
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:23 (fourteen years ago)
no i know -- i was talking even before that, when tirico was like "josh johnson sometimes checks in to run the wildcat." no, he checks in to play... quarterback
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:23 (fourteen years ago)
xp to matt
Painter showed some huevos there.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:24 (fourteen years ago)
this guy Curtis Painter
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:31 (fourteen years ago)
"i call him light switch, jaws"
he's been waiting 3.5 quarters to read this script
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:49 (fourteen years ago)
BLOUNT
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:56 (fourteen years ago)
oh, peyty :(
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:59 (fourteen years ago)
tampa has dropped... 3 INTs tonight? at least
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 04:00 (fourteen years ago)
holy hell, legarrette
― yung huma (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 04:10 (fourteen years ago)