here u go
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 20:39 (thirteen years ago)
Hi
― Aerosol, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 20:53 (thirteen years ago)
pitt +4 in houston, bet all ur us steel bonds
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 22:11 (thirteen years ago)
i love betting on 'american football' too bad i dont know anything about it
― señorita buttstench (Lamp), Thursday, 29 September 2011 02:10 (thirteen years ago)
not knowing much about the sport you're betting on makes the wins that much sweeter.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 29 September 2011 05:19 (thirteen years ago)
Matt where'd you get Vikes -1.5?― frogbs, Wednesday, September 28, 2011 1:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
bodog
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 29 September 2011 05:22 (thirteen years ago)
i'd be shocked if this line doesn't move
― frogbs, Thursday, 29 September 2011 17:05 (thirteen years ago)
Btw I've found an excellent strategy is to do teasers and bet on everything with a spead of 1.5-2.5 and 7.5-8.5. If you have a 1.5-2.5 point dog, then if you tease 6 points, you get them losing by a touchdown. Likewise, if you have a 7.5-8.5 point favorite, you win even if they only win by a field goal. I'm not sure how much extra value this creates but it seems like it would have more value than randomly teasing games that with 4 or 5 point spreads. I'm sure I'm not the first guy to come up with it but I thought I'd pass it along.
― frogbs, Thursday, 29 September 2011 17:08 (thirteen years ago)
the grantland vegas guy just posted abt that v thing today:
http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/5238/viva-las-vegas-making-sense-of-teaser-bets-in-week-4-of-the-nfl-season
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 29 September 2011 17:19 (thirteen years ago)
lol umm did I get my post in before that article went live?
― frogbs, Thursday, 29 September 2011 18:22 (thirteen years ago)
honestly I hadn't thought about doing a teaser past 10 and 14, that's some good advice
― frogbs, Thursday, 29 September 2011 18:26 (thirteen years ago)
Bodog had Atlanta at -5.5 which I eagerly took them up on. This weekend is my first foray into sports betting so it will either be glorious or a nightmare.
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 1 October 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago)
I took arizona at +12.5 at USC today and got hooked up in the last 30 seconds or so. Good times.
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 2 October 2011 05:32 (thirteen years ago)
college football is cruel as hell - if idve hit either my syracuse -2.5 or navy -2.5, both of which were looking p good, id have an extra $300 in my pocket
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 2 October 2011 12:19 (thirteen years ago)
gamblers/degenerates/sickos are prob not happy abt that last sec score by the panthers
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 2 October 2011 20:08 (thirteen years ago)
This Detroit miracle comeback is gonna make me a cool $20 lol
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 2 October 2011 20:16 (thirteen years ago)
ended up winning 3/4 of my bets this weekend. going to chalk it up to beginners luck.
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 3 October 2011 05:19 (thirteen years ago)
yeah I thought for sure my parlay was shot - it had Lions +7.5lost the Steelers -4, but I still think that one had good valuealso put a few bucks on Colts +10, was prepared to look like a total idiot but I had a hunch the Bucs probably aren't going to destroy anybody
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 14:17 (thirteen years ago)
Indianapolis -2.5 Kansas City Minnesota -2.5 Arizona Philadelphia -3 At Buffalo At Houston -6 Oakland New Orleans -6 At Carolina At Jacksonville -2.5 Cincinnati At Pittsburgh -7.5 Tennessee At NY Giants -9.5 Seattle At San Francisco -2.5 Tampa Bay At New England -9.5 NY Jets San Diego -4 At Denver Green Bay -5.5 At Atlanta Detroit -6.5 Chicago
Interesting that the Jets and Bears are such dogs. I would snap bet Chicago if they were +7. Lots of good stuff to tease this week, you can get KC +8.5 vs. Indy (can't see Indy scoring more than 17 or so, even vs. that defense), Arizona +8.5 vs. Minnesota, Cinci +8.5 vs. Jaxxx, and Pittsburgh -.5 vs. the Titans. Acutally the Steelers look the worst out of all those. But I'm definitely taking the KC/Cinci one.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 16:11 (thirteen years ago)
The only bet I lost last week was Atlanta at Seattle at -5.5.. I guess I had no idea the 12th man was such a potent force.. Also won with Detroit, Ravens and Arizona at +12.5 at USC.. Not sure if Im gonna get in on anything this week because I'll be at my college reunion and wont have solid access to tvs anywhere..
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 4 October 2011 20:24 (thirteen years ago)
lost the Steelers -4, but I still think that one had good value― frogbs, Tuesday, October 4, 2011 2:17 PM (8 hours ago) Bookmark
dude, no. you gotta admit to yourself when you're way off on games or you'll never learn anything.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:14 (thirteen years ago)
only line that interests me right now is Raiders +6. If it creeps up to +7 I'm taking it.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:17 (thirteen years ago)
I've admitted mistakes plenty of times but why do you think it wasn't? iirc the line crept up to -3.5 or -3 before closing, the Steelers should have done well shutting down the run and I didn't think their secondary could contain Big Ben. What was your take on it?
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:21 (thirteen years ago)
The Steelers have looked godawful all year. People out-thought themselves that game bigtime. And then the actual result was a really dominating performance by the Texans.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:22 (thirteen years ago)
steelers haven't stopped the run at all!
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:23 (thirteen years ago)
didn't stop rice, didn't stop joe addai with no quarterback
Also with a team like the Steelers, you should be skeptical of the line moving. How much of that move was really from sharps and not from Steeler nation?
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:23 (thirteen years ago)
"all year" - its only week 4. a lot of people have the Steelers to miss the playoffs but I kinda feel like they're going to have a strong second half. if they really are as bad as they've looked lately I have no idea why, unless they're just too old
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:24 (thirteen years ago)
so far no, but I'd expect that to change as the season wears on. for example the Packers are nearly dead last in pass defense despite finishing in the top 5 last year.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:25 (thirteen years ago)
theyll be better than this but it's no shocka that foster broke out in that game.
they are old, and now they're starting to get banged up.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:26 (thirteen years ago)
I just don't see how you could watch that game and think "well, I still had the line right, this is just variance." The Steelers got absolutely dominated. The scoreline wasn't indicative of how it went because of dumb penalties by the Texans. The Texans pass rush dominated, the Steelers D-Line got punked on the run over and over etc.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 October 2011 23:33 (thirteen years ago)
I realize that they only looked good vs. the Seahawks but my reasoning was that they're playing well vs. the pass and have been great vs. the run in years past. To me it really seemed like the -4 line was indicitive of people's reluctance to bet the Steelers after one godawful game and one disappointing one, I think they're a good team that's not playing well at the moment but I would guess they'll still make the playoffs. Likewise I felt the Texans have been overrated though they are improved on defense. I don't blame people who thought there was good value in betting against Carolina even though Cam Newton clearly turned out better than anyone could have guessed. Point is even though I thought the Texans would be favored, 4 points seemed like the maximum they'd give 'em, while at the beginning of the year this would almost definitely have swung the other way.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 00:10 (thirteen years ago)
I had detroit, buffalo and oakland in a teaser and they all covered straight up. Oh well.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 04:00 (thirteen years ago)
I did well on a parlay of detroit -6 and green bay -7. I wish I had the balls to bet on teams who arent the OVERWHELMING FAVORITE but fuck it, it has results.
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago)
I got a teaser with Cinci, Buffalo, and the Chiefs (had to sweat that one), plus three more that mixed and matched those, so it was a great weekend. Also glad I stayed away from the Bears +5.5 (I guess some books had it at 6.5 - was hoping for 7)
― frogbs, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:28 (thirteen years ago)
Early lines for Week 6:
10/16 1:00 ET At Green Bay -15 St. Louis 10/16 1:00 ET At Pittsburgh -12 Jacksonville 10/16 1:00 ET Philadelphia -1 At Washington 10/16 1:00 ET At Detroit -5 San Francisco 10/16 1:00 ET At Atlanta -4 Carolina 10/16 1:00 ET At Cincinnati -7 Indianapolis 10/16 1:00 ET At NY Giants -3 Buffalo 10/16 4:05 ET At Baltimore -7.5 Houston 10/16 4:05 ET At Oakland -6 Cleveland 10/16 4:15 ET At New England -7 Dallas 10/16 4:15 ET New Orleans -4.5 At Tampa Bay 10/16 8:30 ET At Chicago -3 Minnesota 10/17 8:35 ET At NY Jets -7 Miami
― frogbs, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
At the moment I don't really see anything great there. Buffalo +3 looks good. New Orleans -4.5 vs. a team that got obliterated last week seems decent but it may be a trap. I'll probably take both regardless.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
jacksonville +12.5 some places... i think i have to take that.
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 14 October 2011 02:06 (thirteen years ago)
you can tease Jets and Ravens at -1.5 each, and yes I got that one from Grantland :)
― frogbs, Friday, 14 October 2011 02:20 (thirteen years ago)
i kinda like Texans +8. The Raiders are no joke, and their D-Line had the best game of the season against them. +8 seems like an overreaction to me.
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 14 October 2011 08:59 (thirteen years ago)
Week 7 lines:
Chicago -1 Tampa Bay (At London) At Carolina -2.5 Washington San Diego -2 At NY Jets At Cleveland -3 Seattle At Tennessee -3 Houston At Miami -1.5 Denver At Detroit -3.5 Atlanta At Oakland -4.5 Kansas City Pittsburgh -3.5 At Arizona At Dallas -12.5 St. Louis Green Bay -9 At Minnesota At New Orleans -14 Indianapolis Baltimore -7.5 At Jacksonville
All the new QB lines seem interesting. Oakland is lucky to get KC on their first game w/ Palmer. Green Bay should crush Ponder, 9 seems too low. I'm thinking about teasing Baltimore to -1.5, then getting a "free" 6 points on every team. Baltimore -1.5 just seems like such a lock vs. Jacksonville.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 19 October 2011 20:54 (thirteen years ago)
christian ponder did me dirty and my greenbay -9
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 23 October 2011 23:24 (thirteen years ago)
nearly bet that but it moved to -12 on my sportsbook. the Ravens line also moved three points. really wish I did what I said I would but I took Atlanta and Pittsburgh so at least I won money. lol @ me for almost betting huge on the Texans then realizing, "wait, I think the Titans are legitimately underrated"
― frogbs, Monday, 24 October 2011 03:59 (thirteen years ago)
betting on the texans after a horrible loss is a winning strategy imo.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 24 October 2011 22:46 (thirteen years ago)
i can't wait to bet on the raiders vs. st. tebow in week 9.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 24 October 2011 22:47 (thirteen years ago)
had green bay and baltimore this weekend u_u
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 04:49 (thirteen years ago)
oh man
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 10:59 (thirteen years ago)
I broke even. Put too much on the Lions but the Texans and Jets got made up for it.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 11:00 (thirteen years ago)
I thought about betting on GB but then I started thinking that maybe the team would be inspired by the McNabb benching.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 11:01 (thirteen years ago)
I'm thinking about teasing Baltimore to -1.5, then getting a "free" 6 points on every team. Baltimore -1.5 just seems like such a lock vs. Jacksonville.
whewwwwwww thank god I did not do this
hadn't even really considered that lol
― frogbs, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 12:43 (thirteen years ago)
Stanford is -8 against USC this week. Is that a stone cold lock of the week or foolishness?
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:34 (thirteen years ago)
this must be a really good week for Vegas as both the Packers and Ravens line moved three points and neither wound up covering the original spread.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:25 (thirteen years ago)
Week 8 lines: (with the O/U)
At Tennessee -9.5 Indianapolis 43.5 At Houston -9.5 Jacksonville 40.5 At Carolina -3.5 Minnesota 47.5 New Orleans -14 At St. Louis 48 At Baltimore -13 Arizona 44 At NY Giants -10 Miami 43 At Buffalo (Toronto) -6 Washington 46 Detroit -3.5 At Denver 44 New England -3 At Pittsburgh 50.5 At San Francisco -9.5 Cleveland 38.5 Cincinnati -3 At Seattle 38 At Philadelphia -3.5 Dallas 51 San Diego -3.5 At Kansas City 44
New Orleans by 14 points, seems enticing. The Rams are averaging 8 points a game. Similarly, under 48 total points could be interesting, as we know that the Rams will probably not score more than 14.
No idea at the moment how to bet any of these - New England by 3 over Pittsburgh seems good, and maybe there's something on the Lions/Broncos line, though honestly I have no clue how that one's going to play out.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:47 (thirteen years ago)
if stafford is playing I'm betting the Lions. Tebow takes too many sacks already and he's facing the nastiest D-Line in the league.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 22:09 (thirteen years ago)
well I definitely wouldn't take the Broncos. but Staff's been bad the last two games and he may be hurt. if its announced that he's playing for sure I would expect the line to move a point or two.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 22:17 (thirteen years ago)
Week 9:
Atlanta -7 At Indianapolis At New Orleans -7.5 Tampa Bay At Houston -10.5 Cleveland At Buffalo -1.5 NY Jets At Kansas City -5.5 Miami San Francisco -3.5 At Washington At Dallas -12.5 Seattle At Oakland -8 Denver At Tennessee -3 Cincinnati At Arizona -4.5 St. Louis At New England -8 NY Giants Green Bay -5.5 At San Diego At Pittsburgh -3.5 Baltimore
At Philadelphia -6.5 Chicago
Lots of home favorites this week. Cinci +3 seems like a good bet as I doubt the Titan's ability to challenge a winning team and the Bengals seem to be getting better with time. I can see the Oakland/Denver line fluctuating wildly. I really want to bet against Tebow at every opportunity though in this case it means betting on Carson Palmer. I'd also look for the GB/SD line to move following tonight's game.
― frogbs, Monday, 31 October 2011 14:46 (thirteen years ago)
I bet lions -3 and the under of 43 which led me to breaking even.. was pretty sure the broncos would score next to nothing but didnt anticipate the lions scoring like 42 or whatever they ended up with..
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 31 October 2011 21:59 (thirteen years ago)
There actually might be value with Oakland -8 just because Tebow is so historically bad. I was hoping for a better line because everyone seems to be overreacting to that ridiculous situation they put Carson Palmer in a week ago. I doubt Palmer will ever be great again, but I'd be shocked if he's worse than mediocre.
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 2 November 2011 05:28 (thirteen years ago)
didn't see anything worth betting :(
― Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:21 (thirteen years ago)
ok I'll do a dumb parlay just so I'm not bored
― Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:30 (thirteen years ago)
i decided to do something (probably) very stupid by teasing Falcons -1.5 (vs. the Colts) and getting all these lines with it:
Bucs +15Browns +17Jets +8.5Raiders -1.5Bengals +8Packers -.5Ravens +9.5Giants +1549ers PKRams +9Bears +14
I realize I'd have lost my ass had I tried this with the Jags/Ravens two weeks ago (which I nearly did), but I don't see how the Colts wind up pulling this one out. Not sure if I should just be middling everything, seems to be less variance that way but I think the EV is roughly the same
― frogbs, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:52 (thirteen years ago)
Seahawks +17.5 too, oh boy oh boy oh boy
― frogbs, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago)
Week 10
At San Diego -6.5 Oakland Pittsburgh -3 At Cincinnati At Kansas City -3 Denver Jacksonville -3 At Indianapolis At Dallas -6 Buffalo Houston -3 At Tampa Bay At Carolina -3 Tennessee At Miami -4 Washington New Orleans -1.5 At Atlanta At Chicago -1 Detroit At Cleveland -2.5 St. Louis At Philadelphia Off Arizona Baltimore -7 At Seattle At San Francisco -3.5 NY Giants At NY Jets -1 New England
At Green Bay -13.5 Minnesota
Lots of weird favs - NYJ and Bears are favorites over NE and Detroit, plus Miami a favorite over Washington.
KC/Denver could be an interesting game to bet on but I have no idea how
Thinking about doing another megateaser on Baltimore -7 vs. Seattle. I know they lost vs. Jax but Ravens -1 seems like it would hit like 85-90% of the time, right?
― frogbs, Monday, 7 November 2011 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
Chiefs and Chargers look good.
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 7 November 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago)
6.5 point tease of Balt +.5 and Lions +7.5 seems very good
I will also take the Chargers - I'm actually coming around on Palmer a little, but its not like the Raiders are super stacked without him!
― frogbs, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 14:30 (thirteen years ago)
ok so all three of those teams lost outright, gotta say i lost my a$$ this week
on to Week 11:
NY Jets -6 At Denver At Atlanta -6 Tennessee At Miami -2 Buffalo At Baltimore -7 Cincinnati At Cleveland PK Jacksonville Oakland -1 At Minnesota At Detroit -7 Carolina At Green Bay -14 Tampa Bay Dallas -7.5 At Washington At San Francisco -9.5 Arizona At St. Louis -2 Seattle At Chicago -3.5 San Diego At NY Giants -4.5 Philadelphia At New England -15 Kansas City
Would definitely take Dallas at -6.5, but they seem like another good teaser teamPhilly +4.5 seems like a good bet. I'm not sold on NYG and Philly seems more than capable of beating them if they can curb the stupidity for one game
also it's interesting to note that Miami is a favorite over Buffalo - how quickly things change. Buffalo +2 all the way
― frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 15:25 (thirteen years ago)
also, whoaaaa @ Oakland -1 @ Minnesota, that sounds too good to be true
― frogbs, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 15:30 (thirteen years ago)
My weekend picks: bengals +7, raiders -1, cowboys -8
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 19 November 2011 02:17 (thirteen years ago)
cincy covers in the BELK BOWL in epic fashion
― johnny crunch, Friday, 28 December 2012 03:18 (twelve years ago)
http://lastwordonsports.com/2014/11/07/gambling-web-site-says-jameis-winston-point-shaving/
― johnny crunch, Friday, 7 November 2014 21:53 (ten years ago)