can we go back to no size limits on images/ shrinking of large images?
and no limit on the number of images per post?
― gr8080, Saturday, 7 July 2007 22:38 (eighteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/23/Nolimit.jpg/613px-Nolimit.jpg
― tehresa, Monday, 9 July 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)
It's not hard to do. If you get a broad agreement from people on ILX that this is a good idea, then I can do it.
― Keith, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)
IMAGES! LARGE AND MANY!
― gr8080, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 00:47 (eighteen years ago)
Echo...echo...echo...echo...
REVERB!
― Abbott, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)
can we get this changed before its time to make a voting thread for the 1p3 Blondes poll?
pretty please?????
― gr8080, Thursday, 1 November 2007 04:00 (eighteen years ago)
with sugar on top
― jergïns, Thursday, 1 November 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
how bout increase to 5 images? (resizing is good)
― Heave Ho, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
number of images per post limit doesn't really make any sense, does it? Also, it is ruining many of my much-vaunted droll pictoral witticisms.
― John Justen, Thursday, 1 November 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
TOP 20 BLONDES 2006: VOTING TIME
http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?showall=true&bookmarkedmessageid=14&boardid=60&threadid=2955
THIS IS THE THREAD WHERE WE SUM UP ILX CLUSTERFUCK THREADS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THEM.
robots in dis guys
― gr8080, Thursday, 1 November 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)
resizing and three-per-post limit makes it so mods don't have to run around making shit readable again with tedious post-tantrum editing
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)
the resizing is part of the CSS, anyway.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:07 (eighteen years ago)
but isn't three way too small a number? can we have 20? 15?
― gr8080, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha no.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
I don't know how hard it would be for keith to make IRE/ITR have different or nonexistent limits on things like that tbh. I haven't seen the latest builds of what they're doing really. I assume if he can give you guys unregistered posting on those particular parts of the board then relinquishing the img limit could be done as well.
the thing is it would have to be for certain boards. there's no way removing the img limit would really improve ILE/ILM/NB besides allowing JW to do what he does best.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)
ok.
so, just to make sure i'm understanding you clearly, the answer is "no" because it just *might* lead to people making "tantrum" posts with 15 or 20 images that render threads "unreadable"?
am i understanding you correctly?
i mean, i hate it when people throw tantrums as much as you do.
― gr8080, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
if we got rid of the limit I'm fairly positive certain posters would go right back to picturebombing threads as soon as they felt provoked or bored enough.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
yeah
― jergïns, Thursday, 1 November 2007 23:35 (eighteen years ago)
i totally wojld
― chaki, Friday, 2 November 2007 08:54 (eighteen years ago)
WHY HELLO
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 11 November 2007 01:37 (eighteen years ago)
the limitations as they are seem a bit absurd
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 11 November 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)
how abt 7
― jhøshea, Sunday, 11 November 2007 01:41 (eighteen years ago)
This wasn't so much picture-bombing as it was a dedication to my 2006 first-round draft pick.
― Pleasant Plains, Sunday, 11 November 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)
But yeah, I'd be goatseing up the next "Help, I'm so lonely, how do you meet people outside of the coffee shop" thread.
― Pleasant Plains, Sunday, 11 November 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)
goateyesing >>>>> goatseing
― am0n, Sunday, 11 November 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
yah this is super lame. change please. seems that there is enough of a consensus and there is no one opposing. i think 10 is appropriate.
― chaki, Tuesday, 13 November 2007 05:26 (eighteen years ago)
ppl can goatse threads under the current (ridiculous) limitations.
― gr8080, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:18 (eighteen years ago)
for example:
http://goatse.ch/hello.jpg
― gr8080, Thursday, 15 November 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)