(Yes, I know about bookmarks. This is not about bookmarks.)
If you load all posts then threads like 2008 USP(G)ET pt. II: counting the days to 2012 primary thread 1 are long enough to cause problems on old hardware or over slow connections (e.g. click here to load all the posts in that thread: 2008 USP(G)ET pt. II: counting the days to 2012 primary thread 1). Obviously there's a case for keeping things in one place though and it's awesome that nu-ILX can handle threads of this size without batting an eyelid, but it can make looking back for a comment difficult. So how about a preference to paginate threads at, say, 100/500/1000 posts?
― caek, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
good idea
― joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago)
while we're on or near the subject, i do think it's lame that it's the middle of the thread that's hidden -- what's the point of displaying the first hundred posts every time?
i think this is a good idea btw, depends on how "paginate" is handled.
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago)
mypussyssohot.gif
― STINKING CORPSE (cozwn), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
fourthed
― Doghouse O RLY (G00blar), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
what's the point of displaying the first hundred posts every time?
I think the idea here is that if it's a thread you haven't seen before, you can get a sense of what it's about before deciding to read further. And it's 50 posts, not 100. But it could be argued that that's still too many, that most of the time you know what the thread's about within the first 10 posts.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
Such as this one.
― ☑ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
wait, what was this about? I bookmarked.
― caek, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
This pagination thing is just a suggestion. It does seem like the way very long threads are handled need some more thought though.
― caek, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago)
after we get out of the election season, will there be any other hugh jass threads? why code around a 1-thread problem?
just lock that one and start a new thread, if it's crashing for a lot of people.
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
and make sure it has a good title this time
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha seriously
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago)
What should be the maximum number of posts for a thread before a mandatory lock-down takes place and another one gets started?
― ☑ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
2
― lil yawne (harbl), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago)
i think this is a problem even for threads much shorter than the election thread even. it would be nice.
even
maybe if you stopped pumping up the word limit and correcting yourself. MAYBE.
― schlump, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
SHUT UP ALREADY: Ultimate 2008 US Presidential Election Thread For Whiners
― the valves of houston (gbx), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago)
:)
― lil yawne (harbl), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago)
pagination sux. If the thread's that big, it's probably easier to use NuSearch to find it anyway. Otherwise you're gonna have to:Open first big page.Look for commentOpen second big pageLook for commentOpen third big pageLook for commentetc etc
― stet, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago)