Who will have the last word on this thread ?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Its saturday and I'm at work again in the land of the desk jockeys....The last word on this thread will be mine....mine....mine....hahahahahah...(evil laughter)

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:11 (twenty-three years ago)

I will win!!! The day will come when you've totally forgotten about this thread. I will revive it and type in some crap. You won't notice the thread come up in New Answers. And it will pass away again into the ILX galaxies, forever living on with my name at the end. I will be a legend!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh please. Who ever bothers to follow up any of my posts?

― Tha Threadkilla (j.lu), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:20 (twenty-three years ago)

that sounds like a challenge Sarah,

"revenge is dish best surved cold"

Victory will be mine.......hahahahah

may the best man or woman win !!!!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:23 (twenty-three years ago)

One of the moderators will have the last word.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

There is no last, until the site is closed down, or a moderator freezes the thread.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:35 (twenty-three years ago)

where's the fun in that ?

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:48 (twenty-three years ago)

or people get bored and wander offf. u have 2 get under people's skin - or have momus on a thread - b4 it is everlasting.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)

The last word will always be log.

― Graham (graham), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)

it'll be like endless regression, someone will always come along and try and get the last word.

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:11 (twenty-three years ago)

When all your wish's are granted....
many of your dreams will be destroyed.

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Given that one of my wishes is to not see misused apostrophes, they aren't being granted.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:50 (twenty-three years ago)

oh well, maybe some of your more interesting wishes will come true !!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-three years ago)

haha good point!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not trying to have the last word on this thread, since I know that's quite impossible.

― Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:52 (twenty-three years ago)

it'll go on longer than any of my threads, that's for sure...

i could start talking about ass, that would kill it 4 sure. except i think my new ironic crush is on a young keith emerson...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)

*drive by posting*

― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)

kate stepping out with her new ironic bf...

http://www.echonyc.com/~cleo/concert.jpeg

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)

SOMBRERO

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)

fringe...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)

lunatic...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

as in lunatic fringe! (lets turn this into word association!)

frost...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

frost-ed lipstick

― sand.y, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

frosty dipstick... goes back to the 'how cold is too cold to snow...' argument.

when will ed com back so we can eat xmas cake...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it not better to eat cake without Ed? He'll only want a share of it! Or is he bringing the cake?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-three years ago)

ed came back, we ate the cake. i had the heel w/all the marzipan, yum. thoug i've decided i like fruitcake better w/butter because marzipan is so yummy tht eveything pales by comparison.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll tell you something that's been bugging me lately...that mobile phone ad, with that woman who wants to do this and that, like get rid of pigeons, bring back bob marley and ban beards. Hold on there! Bob Marley had a beard, what you gonna bring him back and make him shave off his beard?!?

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:42 (twenty-three years ago)

now we know how 2 get rid of nick... start perving on circa '94 photos of bobby's scottish knob...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:34 (twenty-three years ago)

you lot have just given up, haven't you... will i really win...

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

yes, and you deser . . . doh!

― felicity (felicity), Monday, 6 January 2003 01:01 (twenty-three years ago)

thank. i knew i wasn't that sad... d'oh!!!

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 01:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, here I am again. Do I win yet?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Nope.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Disregard DP. You won, Sarah! But only in an unsatisfying, theoretical way.

― Aimless, Monday, 6 January 2003 16:56 (twenty-three years ago)

DO NOT DISREGARD ME. Send me money instead.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Ok. Stop bickering. I win for sure now.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm still waiting for that money...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I win for today, But have to go home now......anougher day, anougher stress related headache.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)

there can be no winner surely?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, but it's a fun game!!

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

me.

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-three years ago)

no.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

next time.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:17 (twenty-three years ago)

ME!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-three years ago)

no.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:19 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY MONEY GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

in the bank.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY ACCOUNT NUMBER GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

in the drawer.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-three years ago)

WHERE'S MY (ha you're not going to get me that easily)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:10 (twenty-three years ago)

there should be a magic word which locks threads

― naked as sin (naked as sin), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:12 (twenty-three years ago)

And that magic word is...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Hitler?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Titties!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

HITLER-TITTIES!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)

b@ngbus

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)

(I really thought "hitler-titties" would stop the thread cold.)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm winning!

Jeez you guys suck at this game

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I heard you guys were talking about Hitler-titties in here!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Boobies!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)

GOEBBLS-BOOBIES!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:52 (twenty-three years ago)

naughty!

― Kim (Kim), Monday, 6 January 2003 23:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I was pretty proud of that, I was.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 23:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I wasn't

― Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 January 2003 23:31 (twenty-three years ago)

― Curtis Stephens, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 01:57 (twenty-three years ago)

That's not a word.

― Graham (graham), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 02:03 (twenty-three years ago)

― Curtis Stephens, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 02:14 (twenty-three years ago)

It's punctuation, it doesn't count as a word, what are you some kind of conceptual artist, obsessed with the dalliances and paradoxes of the printed form? well good luck to you.

And that's not a word either, what are you trying to do, trick us?

― Graham (graham), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 02:53 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.gamers-forums.com/smilies/contrib/geno/rotz.gif

― Curtis Stephens, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 03:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I won!

― A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 03:07 (twenty-three years ago)

not so soon!

― sand.y, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 04:01 (twenty-three years ago)

i pick here to ask:

on fear factor, did he really just say "you successfully dropped yourself from the helicopter, you stumbled a bit with the horse rectum..."

???? (!!!)

― ron (ron), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 04:56 (twenty-three years ago)

rectum should not be the last word on here, sorry

― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 05:26 (twenty-three years ago)

how many times has the word "rectum" made a showing on prime time network tv? precious few, i'd wager.

― ron (ron), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 05:30 (twenty-three years ago)

"the simpsons" mention of 'rectum' must count for at least several showings..

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:39 (twenty-three years ago)

what about colon?

― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:44 (twenty-three years ago)

or semi-colon?

― C J (C J), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Light the fire and run away

― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)

kaboom

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 12:21 (twenty-three years ago)

ka-boom

― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 12:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Baggy just started this thread to get a higher Responses per Threads Started rating!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 13:25 (twenty-three years ago)

that reminds me of something I've been meaning to find out for ages: why are West Bromwich Albion called the Baggies?

― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 13:46 (twenty-three years ago)

they make bags in west brom?

― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 13:50 (twenty-three years ago)

BOING BOING

― chris (chris), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Have i won yet ?

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)

boing boing baggy baggy

― chris (chris), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Chris has written the answer to the question, "What sound do the Charlatans make on pogo sticks?"

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Billy wiz.

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 14:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Its a diffiuclt one to pitch as it is obvious that unless this thread is locked no-one will ever win it.

― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 16:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Next person to post to this thread has the jobby touch.

Keys up.

― mms (mms), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 16:39 (twenty-three years ago)

If i knew what that was........

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 16:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually that said, it will probably be baggy since he has e-mails sent to him...

― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:27 (twenty-three years ago)

it's all done with strings and mirrors you know.

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Hall & Oates
I Can't Go for That

Easy, ready, willing, overtime,
Where does it stop, where do you dare me to draw the line.
You've got the body, now you want my soul,
Don't even think about it, say no go.

I-- I 'll do anything that you want me to do,
And I'll do almost anything, that you want me too, ooh,

But I can't go for that, (No can do)
No, I can't go for that, (No can do)
Oh, I can't go for that, (No can do)
I can't go for that, can't go for that, can't go for that.

I can't go for being twice as nice,
I can't go for just repeating the same old lines.
Use the body, now you want my soul,
Ooh, forget about it, now say no go.

I-- I'll do anything that you want me to do,
And I'll do almost anything that you want me to do,

But I can't go for that, (No can do)
No, I can't go for that, (No can do)
Oh, I can't go for that, (No can do)
I can't go for that, can't go for that, can't go for that.

(Saxophone instrumental)

Oh, I-- I'll do anything that you want me to do,
And I'll do almost anything that you want me to do,

But I can't go for that, (No can do)
No, I can't go for that, (No can do)
Oh, I can't go for that, (No can do)
I can't go for that, can't go for that, can't go for that, can't go for that.

I can't go for that, can't go for that (No can do)
I can't go, I can't go-- for that, (No can do)
Oh, I can't go for that, (No can do)
Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no can do,
Oh, Ican't go for that, yeah, (No can do)
No, no, no, no, no, no.....
(Repeat to fade out)

― Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Which one of those is the last word ?

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Curly Mullet http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/pic200_web/drp200/p221/p22123qn39r.jpg

― Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I think I've had the one on the left !!!

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)

It's the young Cannon and Ball!

― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 17:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Doh !

― baggy (baggy), Tuesday, 7 January 2003 18:09 (twenty-three years ago)

It's just occurred to me that someone with moderator privileges could cheat by posting something, then locking the thread. Not to give anyone any ideas...

― kate, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 13:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah but another moderator could unlock it.

― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Regardless, we can't allow any moderator-man to end this, that will just come across as authoritarian and act-of-godlike unfair. its for your own rep's good that we can't let you win, tom. and your name shouldn't be the last word either.

marmalade

― Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 13:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe they've blocked me from getting on this site at work.
There's always someone trying to spoil my fun....still as long as theres hundreds of links.

The matrix is all around us.

― baggy (baggy), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 14:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Then beat up Keanu Reeves for me.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Why stop at beating him up?

http://www.aboutfilm.com/movies/m/matrix-reeves.jpg

LOL

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry, that was supposed to look like this...

http://www.aboutfilm.com/movies/m/matrix-reeves.jpg

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:42 (twenty-three years ago)

...Semprini?

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:44 (twenty-three years ago)

In answer to the question - probably not me.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 15:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Take the Blue pill, and see just how far the rabbit hole goes.

― baggy (baggy), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 16:25 (twenty-three years ago)

In the name of T-b-t, I declare this thread CLOSED.

― DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Why?

― rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:01 (twenty-three years ago)

This do it?

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Doh! Damn you html syntax checker, damn you to hell!

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 19:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Hello again. Finally hooked up to the internet in new office! Hurrah!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 21:35 (twenty-three years ago)

lalala

― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I like to hook up to something more romantic, like sexy music and a fine wine.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:43 (twenty-three years ago)

fair enough

― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 22:56 (twenty-three years ago)

You never expect the Spanish inquisition.

― Spanish Inquisition (Jordan), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 23:46 (twenty-three years ago)

me me me me me me me

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 9 January 2003 09:27 (twenty-three years ago)

FUCKERS

― tha winner, Thursday, 9 January 2003 10:16 (twenty-three years ago)

FREEDOM!!!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 13:45 (twenty-three years ago)

Still me.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:11 (twenty-three years ago)

DIE OFF LOSER

― that winner, Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)

It's the eye of the tiger it's the will of the fight! (is that how it goes? hmmm...)

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:41 (twenty-three years ago)

i have to stay up all night, help me.

― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

ARRGHGHGHGHH!H!HH!H!H!H!H!!H!H

(Screaming in your ear to keep you awake, you see)

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:47 (twenty-three years ago)

thanks, its helping

― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 January 2003 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)

I forgot my message.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 9 January 2003 15:05 (twenty-three years ago)

"It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important. It's not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you know, the dark dungeons of the Internet."

― Dubya (nickalicious), Thursday, 9 January 2003 15:11 (twenty-three years ago)

2 and a half hours left for you fuckers to entertain me.

― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 January 2003 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)

the birds are chirping, not long now!.

― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 January 2003 16:35 (twenty-three years ago)

I am 25. Next year I will be in the 26-31 year age range. God help us.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 17:37 (twenty-three years ago)

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:17 (twenty-three years ago)

jel is OTM

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:27 (twenty-three years ago)

zymurgy

― Aimless, Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Amen.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:58 (twenty-three years ago)

oh they are a terrible band!

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 9 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have written in my diary on June 1st:

resurrect the "Who will have the last word on this thread?"

― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 9 January 2003 19:08 (twenty-three years ago)

You write the future?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 9 January 2003 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)

If Sarah wins, then the terrorists don't win.

― Aimless, Friday, 10 January 2003 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)

ROMMEL-CLITORISES

― Tom Millar (Millar), Friday, 10 January 2003 01:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course, according to Graham, the true last word in this thread will be...

log

― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 10 January 2003 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

No.

"What the hell, it's all just chemicals in your brain anyway. We'll all be dead soon."

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Friday, 10 January 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course I write the future.

― jel -- (jel), Friday, 10 January 2003 17:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Evening all, Every day at work the internet police block my access to this site. Every day at work I invent more and links to this site.
Why don't the fuckers just give up and let me have some fun with my life ?

― baggy (baggy), Friday, 10 January 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

huh?

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 10 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-three years ago)

saturday again.

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 11 January 2003 10:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Step off I'm doing the Hump!

― James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 11 January 2003 10:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Bump!

― Vic (Vic), Saturday, 11 January 2003 11:09 (twenty-three years ago)

What you lookin at ?

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 11 January 2003 15:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey, Hot Ass, c'mere! Come Saturday morning, yeah!

― Arthur (Arthur), Saturday, 11 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-three years ago)

im so gonna win this, based purely on the fact that i have a bowl of jelly, so ha!

― louisiana, Saturday, 11 January 2003 21:10 (twenty-three years ago)

This is perverse. You've accidentally started the neverending thread. Where's Llimahl when you need him to sing the theme?

― kate, Saturday, 11 January 2003 21:13 (twenty-three years ago)

The Last Word, there we have it folks, the last word

― louise, Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Do we have a winner?

― kate, Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:07 (twenty-three years ago)

MEEP!

― di smith (lucylurex), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

i rpoabbly should go have a shower now.

― di smith (lucylurex), Sunday, 12 January 2003 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)

It's been dead for nearly twelve hours, so I thought I should revive it.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 12 January 2003 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)

talking dirty in the shack

― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 12 January 2003 16:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Demons-a, begone-a from-a this-a vessel-a of-a God-ah!

I pronouce-a this-a thread-a CLEANSED!

(that's my Southern Amerikaner Preacher Man voice...it's not quite as entertaining on the page)

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Sunday, 12 January 2003 17:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I was reading it like Mark E. Smith.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 12 January 2003 17:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I've won. After I post, this thread will self-combust The last word is mine mine mine!

― Vic (Vic), Sunday, 12 January 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)

think again.

― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 12 January 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

ok, maybe the self-combustion part was a slight miscalculation, but the rest of my post is true.

― Vic (Vic), Sunday, 12 January 2003 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)

― Vic (Vic), Sunday, 12 January 2003 19:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Still going strong I see.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 13 January 2003 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)

"mine" is the answer incase anyones still confused.......
All the answers to our lifes questions are right in front of our noses. All we need to do to see them, is to stop and breath for a few minutes.

todays lesson was bought to you by the letter Y and the number 12.

baggy.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 13 January 2003 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

You're the bone machine!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 13 January 2003 14:15 (twenty-three years ago)

is this burning an eternal flame?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 13 January 2003 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Come now. This is getting stupid. I win and that's the end of it.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 13 January 2003 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Infinity!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 13 January 2003 19:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Infinity times Infinity! TIMES TEN!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 13 January 2003 20:39 (twenty-three years ago)

"The day will come when you've totally forgotten about this thread"

I disagree!

― random googler (jel), Monday, 13 January 2003 20:43 (twenty-three years ago)

you're no random googler, you're jel.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 13 January 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)

CHEATER

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 January 2003 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)

am not.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 13 January 2003 21:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I meant Jel.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 January 2003 21:34 (twenty-three years ago)

oh.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 13 January 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)

can't

let

thread

die

― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

IT LIVES

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 15:12 (twenty-three years ago)

This may be the most uninteresting thread ever.
And yet it intrigues me!!! I can't stop posting to it.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 15:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Apologies for locking this.. I was bored. Continue.

― Graham (graham), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

YAY IT'S BACK

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

B-b-but - I would have won, Graham!

I am sick, but I'm still a winner! God damn it!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 20 January 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread was locked?

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 20 January 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe you're all trying to compete for the last word on this thread.

― Mandee, Monday, 20 January 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I know! Silly innit?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess it is sort of silly.

― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 20 January 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

You're all being very childish, and someone with my kind of wisdom and dignity wouldn't even join in. (haha I'm winning!)

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

You were winning...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Dan should win coz it was his birthday the other day.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 20 January 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...

I intend to win.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)

This is terrible. Please do not revive it. For everyone knows that the last word was only supposed to be MINE

― Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

It wont be me, but then, I'm not sure if I care....

― smee (smee), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't care. Definitely not.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I do.

― Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

That's a shame, cos you ain't gonna win, Vic.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I wouldn't be so sure 'bout that, Nick

― Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I would.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

so futile nick, give up now while you still have your sanity

― minna (minna), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

jel gets an underscore and thus wins.

― Graham (graham), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

um, congrats jel

― Vic (Vic), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

But who gets the LAST underscore?

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread need to be revived.

― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 10 February 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes. I am a public servant.

― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 10 February 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

don't mess with the best

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is silly.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

yes,isn't it?

― alix (alix), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

No.

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes?
NO

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

here

― Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 10 February 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Hi!!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.novareinna.com/scribbles/lastword.jpg

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

You have to say something to have the last word. Duh.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

No you don't

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Shut up. Yer stupid.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Stop being a dumbass.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, will do.

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Jel, Sarah told me to tell you to tell yourself that you are being a dumbass.

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

view source

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Touche

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

but really, I'm gonna retire from this thread

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Senator BRUCE. Begot by, the abuses of the old saloon, and hastened to maturity by the economic necessities and uncalculating enthusiasm of the World War, and by the lavish use of money and political threats by the Anti-Saloon League, national prohibition went into
legal effect upward of six years ago, but it can be truly said that, except to a highly qualified extent, it has never gone into practical effect at all. The appetite for drink, which has been one of the primal impulses of the great mass of human beings ever since Jesus at Cana manifested forth His glory, to use the words of St. John, by converting the water in six water pots into wine, has, In its struggle with the vast repressive agencies set in motion by the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act, furnished another illustration of the truth, which neither moralist nor statesman should ever forget, even in his most fervid moments of disinterested or generous feeling, that man is a creature who can be regulated and bettered, but can not be made over. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of human slavery, Henry Brougham decried what he termed "the wild and guilty fantasy that man can hold property in man." As wild and guilty is the fantasy that even the power of the Federal Government can totally divest man of his warm garment of animal sensations, desires, and appetites. Ever since the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act became parts of the legislation of our land the human instinct of personal liberty, guided by a correct sense of the limits within which natural law can be controlled by municipal ordinances, has maintained an unbroken resistance to them; and nothing can be more unwarranted than the statement often heard that this resistance is limited to a single self-indulgent social class.

It is not kept up more stoutly by what the prohibitionists, vainly seek to excite social disaffection and jealousy, call the smart social set, than it is by the members of the American Federation of Labor. It is not limited to any social class or sect. It has brought about close working relations between the bootlegger and thousands of the most intelligent and virtuous members of American society who feel no more compunction about violating the Volstead Act than the Free Soiler did about violating the fugitive slave law, or the southern white did about nullifying ignorant negro, suffrage, the Federal Constitution in each instance to the contrary notwithstanding And the ever mounting record of arrests for drunkenness in all of our American cities since the enactment of the Volstead Act indicates only too significantly that the humbler and less fortunate members of society have their illicit purveyors of drink too. The recent utterances of Jewish rabbis, Protestant bishops and ministers, and of Catholic prelates like Cardinals O'Connell and Hayes, demonstrate the existence of a growing feeling, even among the American clergy, that absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of human morality.

― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 10 February 2003 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)

oy.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Senator BRUSHES. Begot surrounds, abuses of old hall, and accelerated to maturity by necessities economic and enthusiasm uncalculating of world war, and by use prodigal of money and of threats political by league of Against-Hall, prohibition national entered effect legal upwards does of six years, but truth can to be this which, unless a highly qualified degree, never _ has entered practical effect all appetite for drink, that to have to be one main great impulse human mass to be since then Jesus in Grey hair to show ahead its glory, to use word st. Juan, to turn water six water pote in wine, to have, in its extensive fight with repressive agency to fix to movement by eighteenth amendment and Volstead act, to equip another illustration truth, that neither moralistic nor statesman to always have to forget, uniforms in his the more fervid moment disinterested or abundant sensation, that man to be one creature who power to be to regulate and to improve, but to be able not to be to do above. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of the human slavery, the Brougham henry denigrated what it called "the wild and guilty fantasy that the man can carry out the characteristic in man." Wild and then guilty it is the fantasy that the energy of the federal government even can prevail totally to man of its hot clothes of the sensations, desires, and the appetites animals. Since then the tenth eighth amendment and Volstead the act became parts of the legislation of our earth the human instinct of the personal freedom, directed by a correct sense of the limits within which the natural right can be controlled by municipal ordinances, it has maintained an intact resistance to them; and nothing can be more unjustifiable than the declaration often heard that this resistance is limited a single social class one sameone. It is not continued reason why they call prohibitionists, vainly search to excite disaffection and social jealousy, the elegant social system, that it is in favor more bravely of the members of the American federation of the work. Any social class or sect is not limited. It has brought near relations of work around between bootlegger and the thousands of the most intelligent and more virtuous members of American society that does not feel not more of remorse on the violation of the act of Volstead that the free Soiler did on the violation of the law of the slave of the fugitive one, or the southern target did on annulling to ignorante black, suffrage, the federal constitution in each case on the contrary in spite of and the file whenever it mounted of the haltings for the embriaguez in all our American cities since the promulgation of the act of Volstead indicates only too much perceivably that the humblest members and less lucky people of the society they also have illicit his purveyors of the drink. Jewish the recent elocutions of rabbis, protestant bishops and ministers, and of you bark catholics has taste of cardinals ÓConnell and Hayes, demonstrates to the existence of a sensation every greater time, uniform between the American clergy, who the absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of the human morality.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Dang I was just thinking the other day that I should revive this and indeed get the last word.

― Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Aaron, you're obviously missing the axiom here.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)

ALL POSTS BELOW THIS ONE SHOULD BE ONLY BE MADE BY CHILD MOLESTERS AND MOMMY KILLERS

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

With the exception of this one...
And I am not a dumbass!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

(you mommy killer!)

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

oops thats not fair.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

me?

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)

B-b-but I'm Tha Threadkilla! ILX threads are the only things I ever kill! (Well, those and vodka bottles.)

― j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 05:21 (twenty-two years ago)

shut UP!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 13 February 2003 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Naughty Sterling.

― Graham (graham), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks, Graham. Back to business as usual!

― Sarah McL (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Yo yo, MC L is in the muthafuckin' hizzouse!

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a really short thread, all things considered. 250-odd posts in over a month. If people really cared it'd be much longer.

So we might as well finish it now.

― James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, might as well.

Sarah???

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, oops?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, the lights were too bright there.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Let's try again.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Much better. Soft lighting.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Never mind

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Amateurist you've turned "Contribute an answer" yellow. Fix it, right now!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Arrrghgh! THis yellow is not very soothing!

ARrrghhgh! I am a pirate!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

You prefer?

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Lovely.

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Amatuerist I'm gonna count to three.....

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

One

Two

Three

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, sorry

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

What an amateur

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Now look what you've done!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)