Who will have the last word on this thread ?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Its saturday and I'm at work again in the land of the desk jockeys....The last word on this thread will be mine....mine....mine....hahahahahah...(evil laughter)

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I will win!!! The day will come when you've totally forgotten about this thread. I will revive it and type in some crap. You won't notice the thread come up in New Answers. And it will pass away again into the ILX galaxies, forever living on with my name at the end. I will be a legend!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh please. Who ever bothers to follow up any of my posts?

― Tha Threadkilla (j.lu), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

that sounds like a challenge Sarah,

"revenge is dish best surved cold"

Victory will be mine.......hahahahah

may the best man or woman win !!!!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

One of the moderators will have the last word.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)

There is no last, until the site is closed down, or a moderator freezes the thread.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

where's the fun in that ?

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

or people get bored and wander offf. u have 2 get under people's skin - or have momus on a thread - b4 it is everlasting.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

The last word will always be log.

― Graham (graham), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

it'll be like endless regression, someone will always come along and try and get the last word.

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

When all your wish's are granted....
many of your dreams will be destroyed.

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Given that one of my wishes is to not see misused apostrophes, they aren't being granted.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

oh well, maybe some of your more interesting wishes will come true !!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

haha good point!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not trying to have the last word on this thread, since I know that's quite impossible.

― Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)

it'll go on longer than any of my threads, that's for sure...

i could start talking about ass, that would kill it 4 sure. except i think my new ironic crush is on a young keith emerson...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

*drive by posting*

― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

kate stepping out with her new ironic bf...

http://www.echonyc.com/~cleo/concert.jpeg

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)

SOMBRERO

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

fringe...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

lunatic...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

as in lunatic fringe! (lets turn this into word association!)

frost...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

frost-ed lipstick

― sand.y, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

frosty dipstick... goes back to the 'how cold is too cold to snow...' argument.

when will ed com back so we can eat xmas cake...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Is it not better to eat cake without Ed? He'll only want a share of it! Or is he bringing the cake?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-two years ago)

ed came back, we ate the cake. i had the heel w/all the marzipan, yum. thoug i've decided i like fruitcake better w/butter because marzipan is so yummy tht eveything pales by comparison.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll tell you something that's been bugging me lately...that mobile phone ad, with that woman who wants to do this and that, like get rid of pigeons, bring back bob marley and ban beards. Hold on there! Bob Marley had a beard, what you gonna bring him back and make him shave off his beard?!?

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:42 (twenty-two years ago)

now we know how 2 get rid of nick... start perving on circa '94 photos of bobby's scottish knob...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

you lot have just given up, haven't you... will i really win...

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, and you deser . . . doh!

― felicity (felicity), Monday, 6 January 2003 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)

thank. i knew i wasn't that sad... d'oh!!!

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, here I am again. Do I win yet?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Nope.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Disregard DP. You won, Sarah! But only in an unsatisfying, theoretical way.

― Aimless, Monday, 6 January 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

DO NOT DISREGARD ME. Send me money instead.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok. Stop bickering. I win for sure now.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm still waiting for that money...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I win for today, But have to go home now......anougher day, anougher stress related headache.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

there can be no winner surely?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, but it's a fun game!!

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)

me.

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)

no.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

next time.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

ME!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)

no.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)

WHERE'S MY MONEY GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

in the bank.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

WHERE'S MY ACCOUNT NUMBER GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)

in the drawer.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Skipping 168 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

No you don't

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Shut up. Yer stupid.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Stop being a dumbass.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, will do.

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Jel, Sarah told me to tell you to tell yourself that you are being a dumbass.

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

view source

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Touche

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

but really, I'm gonna retire from this thread

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 February 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Senator BRUCE. Begot by, the abuses of the old saloon, and hastened to maturity by the economic necessities and uncalculating enthusiasm of the World War, and by the lavish use of money and political threats by the Anti-Saloon League, national prohibition went into
legal effect upward of six years ago, but it can be truly said that, except to a highly qualified extent, it has never gone into practical effect at all. The appetite for drink, which has been one of the primal impulses of the great mass of human beings ever since Jesus at Cana manifested forth His glory, to use the words of St. John, by converting the water in six water pots into wine, has, In its struggle with the vast repressive agencies set in motion by the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act, furnished another illustration of the truth, which neither moralist nor statesman should ever forget, even in his most fervid moments of disinterested or generous feeling, that man is a creature who can be regulated and bettered, but can not be made over. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of human slavery, Henry Brougham decried what he termed "the wild and guilty fantasy that man can hold property in man." As wild and guilty is the fantasy that even the power of the Federal Government can totally divest man of his warm garment of animal sensations, desires, and appetites. Ever since the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead Act became parts of the legislation of our land the human instinct of personal liberty, guided by a correct sense of the limits within which natural law can be controlled by municipal ordinances, has maintained an unbroken resistance to them; and nothing can be more unwarranted than the statement often heard that this resistance is limited to a single self-indulgent social class.

It is not kept up more stoutly by what the prohibitionists, vainly seek to excite social disaffection and jealousy, call the smart social set, than it is by the members of the American Federation of Labor. It is not limited to any social class or sect. It has brought about close working relations between the bootlegger and thousands of the most intelligent and virtuous members of American society who feel no more compunction about violating the Volstead Act than the Free Soiler did about violating the fugitive slave law, or the southern white did about nullifying ignorant negro, suffrage, the Federal Constitution in each instance to the contrary notwithstanding And the ever mounting record of arrests for drunkenness in all of our American cities since the enactment of the Volstead Act indicates only too significantly that the humbler and less fortunate members of society have their illicit purveyors of drink too. The recent utterances of Jewish rabbis, Protestant bishops and ministers, and of Catholic prelates like Cardinals O'Connell and Hayes, demonstrate the existence of a growing feeling, even among the American clergy, that absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of human morality.

― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 10 February 2003 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)

oy.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Senator BRUSHES. Begot surrounds, abuses of old hall, and accelerated to maturity by necessities economic and enthusiasm uncalculating of world war, and by use prodigal of money and of threats political by league of Against-Hall, prohibition national entered effect legal upwards does of six years, but truth can to be this which, unless a highly qualified degree, never _ has entered practical effect all appetite for drink, that to have to be one main great impulse human mass to be since then Jesus in Grey hair to show ahead its glory, to use word st. Juan, to turn water six water pote in wine, to have, in its extensive fight with repressive agency to fix to movement by eighteenth amendment and Volstead act, to equip another illustration truth, that neither moralistic nor statesman to always have to forget, uniforms in his the more fervid moment disinterested or abundant sensation, that man to be one creature who power to be to regulate and to improve, but to be able not to be to do above. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of the human slavery, the Brougham henry denigrated what it called "the wild and guilty fantasy that the man can carry out the characteristic in man." Wild and then guilty it is the fantasy that the energy of the federal government even can prevail totally to man of its hot clothes of the sensations, desires, and the appetites animals. Since then the tenth eighth amendment and Volstead the act became parts of the legislation of our earth the human instinct of the personal freedom, directed by a correct sense of the limits within which the natural right can be controlled by municipal ordinances, it has maintained an intact resistance to them; and nothing can be more unjustifiable than the declaration often heard that this resistance is limited a single social class one sameone. It is not continued reason why they call prohibitionists, vainly search to excite disaffection and social jealousy, the elegant social system, that it is in favor more bravely of the members of the American federation of the work. Any social class or sect is not limited. It has brought near relations of work around between bootlegger and the thousands of the most intelligent and more virtuous members of American society that does not feel not more of remorse on the violation of the act of Volstead that the free Soiler did on the violation of the law of the slave of the fugitive one, or the southern target did on annulling to ignorante black, suffrage, the federal constitution in each case on the contrary in spite of and the file whenever it mounted of the haltings for the embriaguez in all our American cities since the promulgation of the act of Volstead indicates only too much perceivably that the humblest members and less lucky people of the society they also have illicit his purveyors of the drink. Jewish the recent elocutions of rabbis, protestant bishops and ministers, and of you bark catholics has taste of cardinals ÓConnell and Hayes, demonstrates to the existence of a sensation every greater time, uniform between the American clergy, who the absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of the human morality.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Dang I was just thinking the other day that I should revive this and indeed get the last word.

― Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Aaron, you're obviously missing the axiom here.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)

ALL POSTS BELOW THIS ONE SHOULD BE ONLY BE MADE BY CHILD MOLESTERS AND MOMMY KILLERS

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

With the exception of this one...
And I am not a dumbass!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

(you mommy killer!)

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

oops thats not fair.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

me?

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)

B-b-but I'm Tha Threadkilla! ILX threads are the only things I ever kill! (Well, those and vodka bottles.)

― j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 05:21 (twenty-two years ago)

shut UP!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 13 February 2003 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Naughty Sterling.

― Graham (graham), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks, Graham. Back to business as usual!

― Sarah McL (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Yo yo, MC L is in the muthafuckin' hizzouse!

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a really short thread, all things considered. 250-odd posts in over a month. If people really cared it'd be much longer.

So we might as well finish it now.

― James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, might as well.

Sarah???

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, oops?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, the lights were too bright there.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Let's try again.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Much better. Soft lighting.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Never mind

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Amateurist you've turned "Contribute an answer" yellow. Fix it, right now!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Arrrghgh! THis yellow is not very soothing!

ARrrghhgh! I am a pirate!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

You prefer?

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Lovely.

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Amatuerist I'm gonna count to three.....

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

One

Two

Three

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, sorry

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

What an amateur

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Now look what you've done!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)