Doctor Who New Series 2005 (spoilers ahoy)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Anyone know when this will be shown by the BBC?
I fear with Top Of The Pops being dropped from a friday that Dr Who will be left to rot in this slot up against Emmerdale & Coronation Street. Giving them an excuse to drop it once again( I will NEVER trust Michael Grade even if he supposedly has no influence on what is shown)

I really hope the series is shown on BBC1 on a weekend slot. Sat or Sun about 6.30 or 7pm would be a great time.

Anyone got any ideas what is going to be in the new series? Perhaps theres been some plot leaks?

Anyone think it's actually going to be good enough to live up to the glory years of Dr Who? I certainly hope the show can be relaunched with the success that star trek next generation had.

Johnson, Thursday, 30 December 2004 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

it's on bbc1, it's been announced for sometime in 2005, but no other details about time slots. There are a lot of pictures and interviews on the official site though: http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/doctorwho/

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 30 December 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks Kyle. I really hope it's not up on against one of the weekday soaps. I've had a bad bad feeling about it though since totps was moved. I'm sure i'm not the only one.

Johnson, Thursday, 30 December 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

A total guess, but I'd say that it'll go out at either 8 or 9pm on a Saturday. It tends to be the slot where the BBC has put a lot of its telefantasy shows over the past few years (e.g. Crime Traveller, Randall & Hopkirk, Jonathan Creek).

carson dial (carson dial), Thursday, 30 December 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Possibly a good call, cd. Though I sense they'll go for earlier on Saturday, to get a bigger family audience; 6.30 or 7, maybe?

Considering the amount of money they're splashing out on it, I doubt the BBC are going to be it in the graveyard slot opposite Corrie. And there have been strong suggestions I gather that it'll be on Saturday, rather than any other day.

I suspect myself it will do very well; the schedules have really been crying out for this sort of show... with good publicity, it'll be rather the hit, I should think. They will easily get fans of the Gatiss/Pegg type shows on board, obv., the question is whether they can get a significant proportion of the wider LOTR or Harry Potter multitudes hooked. The central role of Russell T. Davies reassures me more than anything; the man is one of the shrewdest writers of TV drama (often comedy to some degree too) around. Even if not perfect as a writer - his way with endings can possibly be questioned - he is largely quite a giant in today's 'TV dramatist' world, c.f. the BBC being so keen to get him to write a show for them that they agreed to it being Dr Who, after his insistence. The recent "Mine All Mine" has only confirmed the man's great strengths; quite riproaring fun. It is also a good omen that writers like Paul Cornell and Rob Shearman are on board, writers of good DW in other media. And of course, Steven Moffat... and what seems like possibly inspired casting for the lead roles.

Tom May (Tom May), Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Saturday tea-time would be great as thats the traditional time(up until Davison anyway) Infact im sure when it was moved thats when viewing figures dropped drastically.
I do feel that to gain a new generation like start trek did would mean losing a lot of the old fans. So it's kind of tricky for the new writers. Hopefully it's possible to please both.
One thing for sure if the ratings are bad then I doubt very much it will be back. So lets keep our fingers crossed the BBC give it the best possible chance by giving it the best time slot (and stick with it).

Johnson, Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I only know Eccleston from Shallow Grave and as a result envision his Dr. as being kind of a dick. I wonder if he will be of the crabby 1st/6th Dr. ilk, and if so, how well that will be received?

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Hartnell's Doctor, could, largely in his latter days, be something of a jocular, granfatherly old goat. ;) Particularly in the historical excursions; has rather a ball set against Peter Butterworth in one called "The Time Meddler"; a yarn about a 'monk' with a TARDIS who tries to avert William the Conqueror's victory in the Battle of Hastings...

I imagine Eccleston will be multi-faceted; he only seems to have accepted the role with key assurances, and of course, the presence of Davies. Colin Baker won't be a satisfactory comparison point; he was landed in it by the 'creative team' around him, and various errs. McCoy showed 'range' in a pendulum swing from an amateurish, if not always misfiring turn in his first year, to a well sustained 'darker' portrayal in the final 1989 series. I should think the best comparisons might be Hartnell, Troughton, T. Baker and Davison, really... all actors with a good deal of range (though WH and TB had rather more distinct 'personality' types - indeed Hartnell's sergeant majoring type-casting in various British films, and Baker claimed to use a good deal of his own personality in his portrayal of the Doctor).

Eccleston has I believe intimated that he'd like to bring some humour to the role, so it's not necessarily going to be an 'overly serious' piece of Stanislavskian acting. I was very pleased to hear that he was intent on getting to the bottom of the character, and not playing it as a limited type, aka C. Baker (pompous, overbearing, arrogant blusterer in erm, a coat...) or Pertwee (using the role to do a bit of Bondian business, dispense moral homilies, and generally appear a very 'straight' partriarchal hero...).

Tom May (Tom May), Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

eccleston's the doctor? this might be worth watching.

cºzen (Cozen), Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)

New series goes out in the UK in March, on Saturday nights.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 30 December 2004 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Cozen; Aye, he is that. Did you like "The Second Coming"?

Tom May (Tom May), Friday, 31 December 2004 00:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently it's going up against Ant & Dec.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 31 December 2004 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

what was 'the second coming'? the last thing I think I saw him in was 'strumpet'. he was also good, stabbed, in cracker.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 31 December 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

the second coming.

cºzen (Cozen), Friday, 31 December 2004 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't managed to get confirmation of the new series on sat nights anywhere on the web.

Johnson, Friday, 31 December 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

The BBC commissioned it for Saturday nights when it gave the green light back in 2003. I've not heard anything to contradict that since.

I can't find the original press release but:

http://www.clivebanks.co.uk/Dwnewseries.htm

The Doctor and his friend Rose will be able to travel anywhere, any time, every Saturday night.

http://dwas.drwho.org/news/newseries

Riches warns against scripting a love affair for the Doctor that turns more passionate given the BBC's intention to give it a tea-time Saturday slot.

http://gallifreyone.com/newseriesfaq.php

The story broke in the September [2003] London Daily Telegraph newspaper in an article called "Doctor Who ready to come out of the Tardis for Saturday TV series," which caused a whirlwind of press coverage and was shortly thereafter confirmed by an official BBC press release.

Anyway, BBC1 is running promotions on air now. No dates or anything.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 2 January 2005 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"Mine All Mine" is fantastic (they just started showing it on BBC America). I had a small issue with Davies' Doctor Who book (where he made one of the characters act completely against his established character in order to shoehorn in an implausible happy ending and some sex) but overall he's outstanding. I'm a little concerned that Paul Cornell is involved; I hope they've got a good script editor who can make him focus on plot as well as characterization (which he does excel at).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked Damaged Goods. Not perfect by any means, but he was a lot younger and far more inexperienced back then.

Queer as Folk had the second worst ending of anything ever. If he does that to Doctor Who, I'll... stop watching.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 3 January 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like this guy already. In an interview posted on the BBC site he mentions wanting to make the Doctor less foppish. Apparently Baker & Pertwee were too foppish for him to relate to as a kid. Is this some kind of weird British class thing? I say more foppish! The whole point of Doctor Who is that he's a time-travelling dandy! I don't want to see some "street" version of Doctor Who attempting to pander to modern kids and their newfangled anti-foppishness.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

True, but it's got to succeed abroad, and I'm not sure how the international market would handle a great fop. The '96 movie came across as rather anachronistic due to said foppishness.

I won't form an opinion until I see the thing; until then, I trust the judgement of loads of people at the BBC who want it to succeed.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Exterminate! Exterminate!

Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)

the movie dr. wasn't that foppy either. I kind of liked that movie, I guess I was the only one.

Disappointed they won't show a regeneration this time, he'll be introduced cold. I guess this lets them get right to the point with new stories rather then wasting three months with a dazed guy wandering around figuring out what the hell is up with himself. It always did take half a season to pick up every time he regenerated anyway. but I like the transformation sequences themselves.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Walter: Not, uh, that I'm assuming you won't either. And I do see your point about the Doctor being a congenital dandy. But I assume I can't really have everything I want, and am prepared to just go with it and see what happens. Any new Doctor Who is extremely welcome, even if it's mediocre.

Kyle: The regeneration would alienate viewers. I actually really like the idea of coming into it cold, and with no assumption of prior knowledge [this is the only way to pick up a new audience]. A regeneration would give new viewers the impression that they missed something, which is never a good ploy for any show's first series. Perhaps an 8-9 regeneration will be shown in flashback next year or something, so newbies get an insight into the Doctor's origins.

Although it continues an existing concept, it's very much a whole new television show. This excites me more than anything.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I have faith in Davies, if only because I remember watching Dark Season as a child and being in awe of Marcie (with her canoe paddle!), and scared of Eldritch and Behemoth. It felt like two Dr. Who stories quashed together, so I'm optimistic..

(also, I remember reading an interview with the actress who played Marcie, and she said that Davies had quite a Tom Baker obsession, so perhaps he's spinning things for a more general audience in that interview?)

carson dial (carson dial), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I'm definitely looking forward to this (if we ever get to see it in the US). It's just that I had always hoped to see a new Doctor who was even more over-the-top flamboyant. I always thought Jeremy Brett would have made an awesome Doctor but then I realize there are a lot of old-school Holmes fans who hated what he did with the character. So it's just a matter of taste. It's just that my taste runs toward OUTRAGEOUS FOPPERY! Actually I just like the word fop.

Doing away with the awkward regeneration period is a pretty good idea though. I never would have believed that 2005 would bring both a new Doctor Who series and a big-budget Hitchhiker's Guide movie.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm really beginning to get excited about this. I've been following the photo-diary on the BBC site intently, and the following things are clear:

AUTONS! OK, this has been no secret since the very beginning, but hooray for the return of MY FAVOURITE WHO MONSTER EVAH! There's a biohazard sign in one of the photos, which may be a nice reference to the first BBV auton film.

I should be ashamed of being excited at the photo of Baldy Briggs doing dalek voices (reprising his current role in Dalek Empire?). I am not. It is a badge of courage.

According to a Russell Davies interview, he showed a reporter "very impressive" footage of the Doctor haranguing a dalek he has chained up. The dalek plot appears to have been shot in modern London (or the bits of Cardiff that look like London) so this may well tie in with all the House Of Commons and government stuff that has been seen. A dalek invasion force?

There is what appears to be a 20th century plot featuring a church on the coast and something mysterious which turns up in the water. As long as this doesn't end up looking like a Curse Of Fenric rewrite, it could be great. I suspect the pictures of extras on a bus come from here.

There is what looks like a 19th (or very early 20th) century plot about a missing sea vessel - this could be the same thing as the previous plot I mentioned, or it could be a Bermuda Triangle/lost at sea plot a bit like Carnival Of Monsters?

There are several book files detailing "sightings" in the USA in the 60s. These may well tie in with the clapperboard marked "outer space". There's also a folk-art abduction piece, and evidence there's a story in America. Maybe the missing vessel ties into this?

There's an intriguing photo captioned "the person in this picture isn't important, but the angle he's been seen from is". It's a shot looking up from the floor. Since they're making a point over it... Cybermat? Unlikely, since there are two well known returning monsters already. Kaled? A decent call, but not revealing anything given we know about the daleks already. On that basis, I'm going to stick my neck out and say Rutan. The only problem with that is looking slightly cynical, what with Fang Rock released at about the same time.

There's an equally intriguing photo of a silver ball... not an aspect of The Great Intelligence, surely? So, say I was wrong about the Rutans...

So, a dalek three parter, an auton three parter, a rutan (or Great Intelligence) two parter, an English pastoral three parter and a US alien abduction two parter?

I strongly suspect the Eccleston Doctor will be somewhere between Hartnell and final-series McCoy. Time will tell.

I also think there's a far more prosaic reason why there isn't a regeneration scene planned. It stops Davies having to answer the question of the canonicity of the McGann 'Doctor'. (This may surprise those casually interested but it's a cause of major schism in Who fandom - I, for example, insist he is a Doctor because we see him regenerate from McCoy; whereas Frances insists it cannot be a valid regeneration since it's a film and FILMS DON'T COUNT. We were quite looking forward to seeing who Ecclestone regenerated from, just to prove this very point. If you don't believe me, look up 'Fictional Canon' on wikipedia )

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Might the shot from the floor be from a new K-9?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

ARGH! No to little tin dogs!

RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

From aldo's link:

Although there is some between-films continuity (e.g. references to the death of Bond's wife), the ever-changing cast has rendered any sort of canon determination virtually impossible.

What puny minds these humans have.

Also it mystifyingly omits any mention of Star Wars canon, where the books and games and comics have their own separate continuities with strong links but no hierarchy.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Though I didn't know about Gene Roddenberry trying to get Star Treks V&VI made non-canonical!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Dear Mr Dan Perry

i notice you have time to write on message boards regarding Dr Who the series, despite the fact that you still have 983489273465891273465 Dr Who BOOKS to write about as PROMISED on do you see....

...i for one am greatly disappointed...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Man, and I thought my mum's canonical arguments with the Bishop were bad enough! This puts the Council of Nicene to shame! It's so much simpler being a Babylon 5 fan, that way at least you know where you stand.

Now back to lurking before I am overwhelmed by the smell of geek.

One One To Rule Them All (kate), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

That reminds me, I have more Not Who reviews I could probably put up...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

(I was waiting for someone to complain about the irony of complaining about the smell of geek while sporting a LOTR related screen name, but fortunately no one has caught me out yet.)

One One To Rule Them All (kate), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, the irony of your complaining about the smell of geek while sporting a LOTR related screen name!

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

ARGH! No to little tin dogs!

YES to K9!!! That will be awesome if K9 comes back but they'll probably give him some new bubbly, sleek design which makes him look all dumb and modern.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahaha, okay I get the hint, guys!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)

K9 was great but only when they didn't have to go anywhere. I suppose he'd have to be cgi and float now to move with any speed, which might look really weird.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

K9 should be a real dog that thinks he's a robot.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I should hate K9:

1) He's in some great storylines (c.f. Key To Time).

2) He's better than Kamelion (Deny that Dan).

3) The Invisible Enemy was really good as well.

4) John Leeson was 1000x better than Sophie Aldred.

5) Or Bonnie Langford.

6) And he acted with Tom Baker, which was more than Julian Glover ever did (much as I love City Of Death).

7) K9 didn't outstay his welcome as a companion compared to some (the aforementioned Mel and Ace).

8) He had a whole spin-off with Liz Sladen, which in actual fact was a spin-off of the never-piloted SJS Journalist show which was discussed several times.

9) He got to call Lalla Ward "mistress".

All these things are in his favour.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I should hate K9:

1) He's in some great storylines (c.f. Key To Time).

Granted, but that's nothing to do with him being in it. He can't even roll into the Tardis properly ffs. Anyway, Romana I is way hotter than him.

2) He's better than Kamelion (Deny that Dan).

So's Adric. And Nyssa. I mean really.

4) John Leeson was 1000x better than Sophie Aldred.

FITE! Ace is my darling.

5) Or Bonnie Langford.

At least Mel did something, even if that something was screaming loads and wearing the kind of high-slung slacks my grandmother wears to lawn bowls.

6) And he acted with Tom Baker, which was more than Julian Glover ever did (much as I love City Of Death).

Pffft. I'm not convinced saying 'yes master' in a monotone voice every 12 seconds counts as acting.

7) K9 didn't outstay his welcome as a companion compared to some (the aforementioned Mel and Ace).

What, Mark I, II or III? At least Mel didn't come back in subsequent incarnations, and if she did she'd have improved. K-9 didn't even grow legs.

8) He had a whole spin-off with Liz Sladen, which in actual fact was a spin-off of the never-piloted SJS Journalist show which was discussed several times.

You managed to sit through that thing? omg you deserve a medal.

9) He got to call Lalla Ward "mistress".

So did Tom Baker.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

There's an intriguing photo captioned "the person in this picture isn't important, but the angle he's been seen from is". It's a shot looking up from the floor.

I reckon that's just a Dalek thing.

I also think there's a far more prosaic reason why there isn't a regeneration scene planned. It stops Davies having to answer the question of the canonicity of the McGann 'Doctor'.

Davies has already said Eccleston is playing the ninth Doctor, and I think he even said he considers McGann'S Doctor a proper one. After 500 audio dramas and 2398742938742934 books, he couldn't really not be 'canon', could he? [even if the actual stories are not]

Anyway, the whole 'canon' thing is a wank. I'm hoping Davies deliberately contradicts so much of the old series than anorak fannies have no choice but to fuck off. Here are my suggestions:

1. The Doctor is half-human, half-Ice Warrior, and was adopted by Davros's two incestuous love children whilst on holiday in Gallifrey

2. The Tardis's VWORP-VWORP-VWORP noise turns out to be caused by a carrot in the mechanism, which once removed causes the Tardis to make a lovely sound akin to pixie dust

3. The Doctor had a leather fetish all along, and kills animals in his spare time

4. Peladon doesn't really exist, and was all just a dream [I'd pay to see that]

5. Romana regenerated because he got her up the duff

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)

6. Mel chose the sixth Doctor's wardrobe

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

7. The sixth Doctor chose Mel's wardrobe

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

(I fully endorse #5, Adam.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, perhaps Gallifreyans reproduce by regenerating! And Romana I is Romana II's mum. Which means Lalla Ward was Baker's daughter. EWWW.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)

People hate K9? Who knew? The way he's always just barely catching up is part of his charm. I like to daydream about how he floats up and down staircases in scenes they never showed.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 6 January 2005 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

More reasons K9 was great:

10) As noted by Eric Saward (I'm sure it was him, although writing the rest of it makes me think it might actually have been Sarah Sutton) in the Earthshock documentary, the Three Companion era was dominated by two of them going off doing things with the Doctor while one remained stuck back in the TARDIS. K9 pioneered this radical approach to companions.

11) K9 was useful, even when broken (as in Full Circle, where the Doctor uses his head to scare the Marshmen). Ace was useless, even when not broken.

12) Waggling his tail unjams his probe circuit (with the advantage of curing Chronic Hysteresis).

13) He wasn't in Time And The Rani or Paradise Towers.

(This is turning into Defend The Indefensible: K9, isn't it?)

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 6 January 2005 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

K9 pioneered this radical approach to companions.

Only because they couldn't leave him on his own.

11) K9 was useful, even when broken (as in Full Circle, where the Doctor uses his head to scare the Marshmen). Ace was useless, even when not broken.

LEAVE OFF MY ACE OR THERE'LL BE TROUBLE.

Anyway, Ace had guts. K-9 had a pissy little death ray that didn't even work half the time.

12) Waggling his tail unjams his probe circuit (with the advantage of curing Chronic Hysteresis).

Shouldn't get jammed in the first place. He's a futuristic robot ffs.

13) He wasn't in Time And The Rani or Paradise Towers.

Um... I can't challenge that.

(This is turning into Defend The Indefensible: K9, isn't it?)

Heh, it needs its own thread now. :)

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll continue it if you start it. I think I've shot my bolt about eulogising K9.

(I'll continue to argue Ace with you though, because she was TEH FCUKIN' RUBBIDGE. Have you never watched Mindgame, which shows the full extent of Sophie's acting abilities i.e. FUCK ALL?)

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 6 January 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Mindgame? Nope.

Anyway it's Ace the character I have a mega crush on, although Sophie Aldred isn't half bad looking once you get past the acting. And compared to the run of companions before her [Mel, Peri, Tegan, Nyssa, Adric for christ's sake] in acting terms she's bloody Judy Dench as far as I'm concerned.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 7 January 2005 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

No dissing K9. Just stop that right now. No arguing, the correct response is "Yes, mistress!"

And no dissing Adrick, either. He shaped my preadolescent brain in ways I don't like to think about.

Ace, however, yeurgh, dis all you like, starting with what sort of accent *was* that supposed to be?

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Mindgame is on my Definitely Not Doctor Who thread. She was shit in The Stranger: More Than A Messiah as well.

Ace, the character, is pretty good. Where it all falls down, however, is casting a 26 YEAR OLD WOMB-MAN as a 15 YEAR OLD GURL. Everybody apart from JNT could see that was a fatal flaw.

I like Peri. And Tegan. And almost even Adric (although teenage stroppery is a bit wearing, and for greater grumpy teen accuracy where was his giant stash of pr0n? Or his unwanted stiffies whenever a woman walked past?). But Nyssa is where I draw the line. And Mel, obviously, but that goes without saying.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)

have we ever had POV: companions?

(lovely thread BTW, carry on)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm almost certain that we had a thread about companions. Or maybe it was a pub conversation? Romana vs. Leyla: FITE! (apologies for my horrible spelling) clearly being indicative of boys personalities in some very revealing way.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

...i.e. that whether a boy picked Romanna or Leila was indicative of which female archetype they were more attracted to/afeared of, not FITE!!! in the kinky pervo sort of way that I have actually seen slash fan fiction about.

Both being very strong and empowered female archetypes, etc. but representing different kinds of strength and empowerment.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

give me Peri or give me death. or give me Perry.

Stevem On X (blueski), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I was slightly older, and therefore able to remember CLASSIC Doctor Who a bit better. The only assistants I can remember at all are Ace and Mel.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

We definitely had a companions thread because I remember shouting down Tegan-hate. Tegan was awesome.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 7 January 2005 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Here it is It seems to have completely passed me by.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Was there yet another one? because I'm not on that one (started during my interwebless Hoxton exile) and I definitely remember participating in one.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. Second post in. My geek shame.

Doctor Who: Classic or Dud?

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Castrovalva still rocks. Mutter mutter mutter.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Both Nyssa and Tegan were lame compared to TURLOUGH/TURLOW/oh that spoddy ginger one you know the one I mean, he had ginger hair which shone out of the BBC props department with aplomb!

The best assistant is Romana 2 and that will never change.

I agree K9 should be a real dog who thinks he's a robot!

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought Earthshock specifically for the purposes of seeing Adrick blow up, haha I bet his certificate in mathematical excellence was a basic numeracy certificate from Milton Keynes community college, LAME LAME LAME!

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Also it was 25pee or so.

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

The best companions are Zoe, Jamie, Romana II, Jo Grant, Peri and Barabara.

Apart from Leela though, who's better than all of them. And I have a soft spot for Liz.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Also UNIT: classic or dud! Of course the Brigadier and all his little weasels = grebt but was UNIT a distracting device from the Dr's wider adventures through space and time?

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

::glares at Starry::

::sticks fingers in ears and sings la la la la I can't hear you::

x-post

I always thought that UNIT was dreamed up by the BBC props department so they wouldn't have to dream up any more STRANGE ALIEN PLANET SETS EVER AGAIN!

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, Adric's badge for mathematical excellence must have been more than 25pee as it was pure gold and was used to kill the cyberleader in the DOCTOR VS CYBERMAN FITE!

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

UNIT = dud, on the whole. All a bit too dying days of empire innit? Not that I don't like Lethbridge Stewart, but the Pertwee/UNIT adventures really do feel like period pieces now.

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

But... but... I thought it was subtle and moving commentary on the dying days of Empire.

Plus, well, Bessie!!! OK, not a patch on the TARDIS, but still. OK, you're right, she was lame. Forget I brought it up.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Bessie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Whomobile

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't remember the Whomobile. Do I ever dare ask?

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't either. If it's worse than Bessie I am mighty afeared.

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Pertwee's vintage car, foax!!

I have just remembered the episode where he manages to convince a bunch of addled Morris dancers not to... MAN! What a load of old tat I must watch it again soon!

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Was that Bessie, oh I can't recall! Must be some kind of alien brainwave interferance obv

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

That *was* Bessie. What is ver WHOMOBILE? Pictures, if possible, as well, please.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

It was a sort of hovercraft thing, which also flew. Pertwee looked like a twat in it. (There's a piece on one of the DVDs - might be The Three Doctors - where he takes it into Blue Peter and he and Peter Pervey look at it.) It's only in Invasion Of The Dinosaurs and Planet Of The Spiders.

http://pages.zoom.co.uk/elvis/drwho2.jpg

http://www.3wheelers.com/drwhom.jpg

http://www.imps4ever.info/specials/whomobile/whomobile_ontheroad.jpg

It was crap.

UNIT must equal KLASSIKKKKK as it gave Lethbridge-Stewart one of the best lines ever in Who - "Jenkins... chap with wings there. Five rounds, rapid."

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, about this Jonathan Creek thing :-)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

What *IS* that thing? It looks like one of those dreadful experimentalist cars with three wheels that the headmaster of my dreadful experimentalist school used to drive.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh god, I remember it now.

RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 7 January 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I always thought that UNIT was dreamed up by the BBC props department so they wouldn't have to dream up any more STRANGE ALIEN PLANET SETS EVER AGAIN!

Hahaha that's almost EXACTLY why the started doing the UNIT stories!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate it when I'm right.

Masonic Boom-Boom (kate), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, weren't we supposed to be talking about New Who?

I am sure Billie would be marvellous!

Starry (hello chickens), Friday, 7 January 2005 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate: Ace, however, yeurgh, dis all you like, starting with what sort of accent *was* that supposed to be?

At least she got the country right. Whatever the fuck the-woman-who-played-Peri [can't remember her name off-hand] was trying to do with her accent, it wasn't even the same continent. And she was sooky.

Dan: Tegan was awesome.

Her accent was crap. And Janet Fielding was even actually from Brisbane.

aldo_cowpat: it was pure gold and was used to kill the cyberleader in the DOCTOR VS CYBERMAN FITE!

Clearly it had a lasting effect on the remaining Cybermen. Seen Silver Nemesis? Jesus.

I can't even remember Leela. This bothers me. Oh, and UNIT = dud, by and large.

Billie looks ace in the publicity shots.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 9 January 2005 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"I always thought Jeremy Brett would have made an awesome Doctor but then I realize there are a lot of old-school Holmes fans who hated what he did with the character"

Really? Could you shed more light on this?

Bumfluff, Sunday, 9 January 2005 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Proto-Xena.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 9 January 2005 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Having had three days to think about this, I hereby declare Leela a [b]butterface[/b].

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

With correct tags obv

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

MADMAN. She has one of the cutest faces of all of the Who companions (excepting of course the female Troughton companions, all of whom seem to be part sexy elf).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Sarah wasn't half cute. And what about Peri? When she kept her mouth shut and forced a smile she was all right.

And ACE. Crikeys.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

COMPANIONS RANKED BY TEH FACIAL HOTTTTTTNESS:

Zoe (seriously, she is freakishly, abnormally cute; I think she's part kitten)
Victoria
Leela
Romana I
Sarah Jane
Polly
Nyssa
Tegan
Peri
Jo Grant
Susan
Barbara
Liz Shaw
Katarina
Ace
Vicki
Sara Kingdom
Romana II
Mel
Dodo

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)

(Poor Dodo. No one seems to like her at all. Anyone else read The Man In The Velvet Mask?)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:19 (twenty-one years ago)

My list isn't far different:

Zoe
Romana I
Liz Shaw [omg those EYES]
Victoria
Susan [really, have a closer look, she's all horn]
Polly
Jo Grant
Sarah Jane
Ace
Leela
Peri
Tegan
Barbara
Vicki
Sara Kingdom
Katarina
Romana II
Mel
Dodo
Kamelion
K-9
Sonic Screwdriver
That hammond organ tardis from Attack of the Cybermen
Nyssa

xpost: No

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

...Interesting things happen to poor old Dodo. Fan opinion is divided but it's strongly hinted that she ends up with syphillis at the end.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)

A question that occured to me yesterday:

How often does the Doctor turn up during an exciting event, and how often is him turning up the exciting event? Does it vary by doctor/writer? Apart from the UNIT stories, where obviously the point is that he doesn't 'turn up' at all.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 13 January 2005 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)

He turns up just before interesting things happen. Usually on the brink of a political revolution. The Tardis probably has an Interesting Thing circuit that attracts it to shifting paradigms.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1242925.html

"Filming of the new series of Doctor Who has been hit by a shortage of dwarf actors"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 13 January 2005 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently that story's like a whole year old and doesn't actually matter anymore.

Adamdrome Crankypants (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 13 January 2005 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Some more hints in the new DWM, including a piece that proves I was completely wrong on my assumptions about the episodic format of the new series. There are, in fact, only three plots that will be more than one episode, and the dalek story is only a single episode. This makes me think DVD release will ultimately come out as a series set only, as I can't see how else they can format it. Mark Gatiss' episode has Simon Callow in it as Charles Dickens. Other guest stars include Richard Wilson, Simon Pegg and Zoe Wannamaker.

In other news, I've decided we're going to go to Aldebourne for a bit of a trip tomorrow (weather dependent, although we can always hide out in the pub if it's too bad) so I can pretend to be Lethbridge-Stewart.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

They could in theory still have cliffhangers at the end of (single-episode) stories. If so, one would hope and rather expect something better than the end of Time-Flight episode 4... ;)

All of the above casting is good in a prestige-type way. One hopes they will do something interesting with Wilson... I'd like to see a few more of the odder castings, like Andrew Marr (who is to play himself... presumably in a scene akin to those media-reaction relays in "The Second Coming").

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 15 January 2005 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
An affectionate tribute, to whet your appetites.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 4 February 2005 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
1st episode of the new series of Dr Who has leaked onto the net!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4326005.stm

Anyone seen it?

Dr Who, Monday, 7 March 2005 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I just read the review of it on aicn, but since the reviewers on that site are populated by drooling sub-calum fanboys it's probably not very reliable.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Monday, 7 March 2005 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahaha.
Is calum a Dr Who fan boy then ?

Dr Who, Monday, 7 March 2005 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The leaked version's been known about for a while, one can't help thinking the BBC's sudden news coverage of it is more than a little disingenuous.

I haven't seen it (it's only three weeks, I can wait that long), but apparently it doesn't have any of the incidental music but is otherwise complete. AICN are alone, I think, in their dislike of it given some of the other reviews I've heard about. Mind you, they liked Attack Of The Clones and The Phantom Menace before they were released so their judgement is questionable to say the least.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

so are the Daleks gonna look the same? i like the idea of their design being scrutinised and tested in this new series via plot devices, perhaps culminating in a new c21 design (e.g. Re-Evolution Of The Daleks)

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I hear their new design is based on pre-adult Terran felines.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

more of a tweevolution then

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.bsfs.org/images/xmas-dalek.jpg

A Very Dalek Christmas

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

The leaked version's been known about for a while, one can't help thinking the BBC's sudden news coverage of it is more than a little disingenuous.

But the BBC was always going to start publicity on the 8th of March, so it was arguably ready to go anyway.

The new episode is sitting right here, actually in my lap. Literally. Yet I cannot watch it, because 'er indoors [who incidentally HATES Doctor Who] wants me to wait for her. Which means Saturday. GAARRGHGHH.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I did watch the title sequence. SIXTEEN TIMES.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

The first line under the picture here might indicate this is the only way that you 'Merkins get to watch this.

I'm still waiting for it to air 'proper'. The Ecclestone trailer was on BBC2 last night for the first time. I was dead excited.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

We get bugger-all in Australia. Our network hasn't even bought the bloody thing yet.

You would do well to read this, PARTICULARLY THE LINKS AT THE END.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Mind, I haven't followed the links myself but I suspect one of them might be HIGHLY ILLEGAL.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

DEMATERIALISING TARDIS!
EXPLOSIONS!

I am officially very, very excited. It's a good job it's less than a fortnight away otherwise I think I might explode.

When I get home from work, I may well download the CBC trailers.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 14 March 2005 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

(hasn't australia been repeated them all* from the beginning?

*all = all that haven't had horse racing taped over them)

two Dalek films on the friday before the saturday that this airs (Good Friday) btw. bbc2 and ch5.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 14 March 2005 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

? Doctor Who And The Daleks is on this coming Saturday on BBC2. Also this weekend, a minor Doctor Who Night on BBC2 with a repeated doc, a new doc and Who Mastermind.

There's going to be another new doc on the night of transmission of Rose beforehand, and Who Confidential on BBC3 afterwards.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 14 March 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe bbc america will actually show it although they're so shit they probably won't.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 14 March 2005 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The 30 second CBC trailer is absolutely awesome, and definitely has footage from episodes after the first one.

I'm still resisting the temptation to watch the rough cut of Rose, although it's sitting on my hard drive calling out to me. I can wait till after the screening, then point out the differences. I hope.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

OH

MY

FUCKING

GOD

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

is the whole story leaked? is this still going to be a weekly half-hour serial or are they doing full stories in one hour this time?

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Full stories in 45 minutes for the main... although (correct me someone, if wrong) there are two two-parters - one written by Steven Moffat.

This is a quite unprecedented build-up... this will clearly get more than 10 million viewers first up. After all, the return of Auf Wiedersehen, Pet got 12 or so million didn't it, in 2002? There may have been less competition, but I hardly think that Ant and Dec's core demographic are the only people this series will get on board. I bet many like me rarely if ever watch terrestrial TV on Saturday evenings... getting a whole new audience on board must be the game.

Tom May (Tom May), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

There are (from memory) three two-parters, but following the US 45 minute format rather than 25 (yes, I know they take an hour over there, but no adverts on BBC). Only Rose has leaked, but it's a very early cut with unfinished effects and no music. It needs a bit fo editing as well (apparently, I've resisted watching it yet)

Anyway, tonight's 50 second trailer was absolutely awesome. This is potentially the best thing ever. The Dalek from Episode 6 is unbelievable. This is definitely the most attention I can ever remember the BBC giving a show in advance of transmission.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 23:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Amazing innit? The BBC's gone into overload. Even Newsnight covered it, complete with Paxman dematerialising at the end and everything. It's all over the place.

I watched Rose on Friday night. Bloody brilliant. Really really pleased. Better than anything I'd imagined. Very very sophisticated, funny, exciting, and brilliant characterisations. Even my wife said she'd keep watching. A couple of small aspects pissed me off no end but they could be overlooked, and probably won't come up ever again.

(hasn't australia been repeated them all* from the beginning?
*all = all that haven't had horse racing taped over them)

Yep. Started at the start in late 2003, skipped all the missing and part-missing ones, and skipped all the Dalek stories in Troughton's and Pertwee's tenure [rights issues apparently]. Tonight's part one of The Sun Makers, so more than halfway I think.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

The irony of THAT is the ABC [that network] hasn't bought the new series yet. It's said to be 'considering' and wants to see all 13 episodes first, but even then it might not go out until NEXT YEAR. So I'm taking the naughty route.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

ARGH ONLY 11.8% ARGH ARGH ARGH

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, tonight's 50 second trailer was absolutely awesome. This is potentially the best thing ever.

I just saw it. FUCK.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Dead set this show is going to be the best thing to happen anywhere ever.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

me: "If I was 10, I'd think that was the best thing ever!"
F: "al, you're 35 and you still think it's the best thing ever."

Our house, after watching the trailer for about the twentieth time.

There are little dalek blueprints on the lightbox behind the dalek. You can see the inside of the police box doors in the console room. There are still 10 days to go.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I am supremely excited.

I have been charged with digging up one episode per doctors 1-7 for a watching party, umming and ahh-ing over the choice of episodes is proving delightful.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Hartnell: The Aztecs Episode 3. The Doctor's romance is blossoming while he's being manipulated behind the scenes to put Ian in danger.
Troughton: The War Games. Can't remember the episode number, but it's the first one Philip Madoc is in, when all the double-crossing starts.
Pertwee: Sea Devils Episode 2. Lots of Doctor/Master dialogue. But in a good way.
Tom Baker: Talons Of Weng-Chiang Episode 2. Has the 'Leela eating' scene, worth the price of entry alone.
Davison: Earthshock Episode 1. It's all about the Cyberman reveal.
Colin Baker: Vengeance On Varos Episode 1. A decent satire on the media age, and Martin Jarvis is brilliant.
McCoy: Remembrance Of The Daleks Episode 4. McCoy gives that speech to Davros, while all the time encouraging them to destroy themselves.

Although the flaw with this is that Doctors 6 & 7 have episodes twice the length of the others...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

If there's ANY Earthshock it would have to be the last one so we can shout HURRAH as Adric DIES A PAINFUL DEATH. But no, please law no Earthshock.

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

you need episodes that feature all the bit players. i am including BLS, Bessie, K9 and sonic screwdriver as bit players here.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

My current picks feature: K9, Bessie, probably the sonic screwdriver though I've not checked, the Brigadier et al., daleks, fantastic constumes, bidonkulous weapons, British TV slebs, one notorious continuity shocker, good acting, great acting, dreadful acting and something for the Dads.

NB I have been going for 'representative' over 'great' in most cases.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

something for the Dads

Ah, episode 1 of The Two Doctors.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

'representative' over 'great'

Hartnell: Dalek Invasion Of Earth Episode 1. Passes almost without note, until the Dalek comes out of the water...
Troughton: Tomb Of The Cybermen Episode 3. Cybermats, plus the Cybercontroller with the giant head. Good competition, however, from Seeds Of Death Episode 2 (watch Jamie's hands as the spaceship crashes), 4 (Zoe in front of the wall of lights is perfect), 5 (gallons and gallons of foam) and The Abominable Snowmen Episode 2 (yeti action).
Pertwee: Spearhead From Space Episode 4. UNIT, the electrical device that disables Autons, the final tentacled nonsense. I think the polarity of the neutron flow gets reversed at one point, plus AREN'T WE ALL SCARED OF COMPUTERS.
Tom Baker: Meglos Episode 1. Chronic Hysteresis, K-9's tail, Lalla Ward and a giant, talking shapeshifting plant.
Davison: The Visitation Episode 3. Great dialogue, historical nonsense, a very complex alien and the destruction of the sonic screwdriver.
Colin Baker: The Two Doctors Episode 1. A costume so revealing, Peri wears a jacket for most of it. Jacqueline Pearce trying hard not to be thought of as Servalan.
McCoy: Happiness Patrol Episode 1. Your party needs the Kandy Man.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

call me crazy but i would quite like to see the McGann movie again. the defence of it on the BBC site was strangely convincing...

Sven Bastard (blueski), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad this is going to be on CBC.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG aldo is completely OTM about Happiness Patrol!!!! The only thing that would be better would be Paradise Towers 2.

T. Baker MUST be one of the following:

Ark In Space 2
Robots of Death 4
Horror at Fang Rock... 2 or 3? Can't remember which one is the absolutely fantastic one.
Pirate Planet 2
City of Death... 2?
Full Circle 4
Warrior's Gate 2
Logopolis 3

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm guessing the Fang Rock one you mean is where Leela spends most of it slapping Adelaide. Ep 3, I think.

I'd suggest Ark In Space 3 is more suitable - 2 is a bit dialogue-heavy and too many 'awakening' scenes, whereas 3 has the Wirrn in the power source and the full transformation of Noah. Robots Of Death 4 has the helium scene, which makes it genius. Pirate Planet 1 has the K9/Mentiad FITE, although 2 is a good one as well. City Of Death 2 features the fantastic moment (albeit only as recap) where Julian Glover's head becomes bigger when he removes his skin, and has all the Leonardo nonsense in it? That's a good one, aye. I was going to say Full Circle 4, but I didn't think it would please the Adric hataz and the disembodied head of K9 might not be enough for some. Great pay-off though. Logopolis 3 - see my comments upthread on suggesting Sea Devils 2. I would need to watch Warrior's Gate again to refresh my memory.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

You're completely right about Ark In Space; part of my problem is that I always watch these stories in full so I can never remember which episode is which.

Full Circle 4 is possibly the best episode with Adric in it that doesn't feature him slamming into the side of the Earth and killing all the dinosaurs.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Hartnell: the first one [introduction of everyone/everything]
Troughton: War Games, episode 9 [brilliant brilliant brilliant]
Pertwee: Carnival of Monsters, episode 1 [fun, intriguing, good exposition]
Baker v1: Pirate Planet, episode 4 [funny, clever, good acting, MARY TAMM]
Davison: Black Orchid, episode 2 [only good Davison-era I can think of]
Baker v2: Trial of a Time Lord, episode 13 [it's Holmes's final y'know, and the previous series is all 45-minute episodes]
McCoy: Remembrance of the Daleks [flying Dalek I mean come on ffs]
McGann: OMG NO FUCK OFF FUCK OFF [give 'em Tomorrow Windows to read instead]

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

You could pick any random episode from Four To Doomsday, Black Orchid, Kinda, Snakedance, Mawdryn Undead, Enlightenment, The Awakening, Frontios, Resurrection of the Daleks, or Caves of Androzani and do very well.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the stories from the DAvidson era were probably the best, or at least my favorite, although he was far from my favorite Doctor.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Not only did he have a lot of the best stories, on balance he's my favorite Doctor and has my favorite TARDIS crew (except of course Leela and K9).

(Yes, I was 10 when "The Five Doctors" came out.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

(Having said that, "The Pirate Planet" borders on perfection.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

You could pick any random episode from Four To Doomsday, Black Orchid, Kinda, Snakedance, Mawdryn Undead, Enlightenment, The Awakening, Frontios, Resurrection of the Daleks, or Caves of Androzani and do very well.

I'm tempted to put Planet of Fire episode 1, just because it's got no Nyssa or Tegan and Peri doesn't talk much.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

btw good call on Resurrection, but Awakening/Kinda/Snakedance? URGHH.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, remember upthread when I said I was obsessed with Tegan?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh. No.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, basically Janet Fielding = WOW I LOVE THIS EPISODE!!!!!!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah anyway I've got stuff to do so I'll just stand over... here.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:12 (twenty-one years ago)

dan and aldo are talking much sense. city of death and robots of death both totally rules from start to finish. an episode of ark in space is also in order.

if we are doing POO ep per doctor i would have to go with Robots of Death ep 4 for Tom B. (so SO close with any ep of City of Death - tho prob the one where Dr says "What a marvellous butler -He's so violent" and where romana II does the chinese puzzle box)

Davidson that would be ep 3 of Caves of Androzani cos it is THE best cliffhanger EVAH ecah evah

however as i have seen these so many times, there is a sense of weighting vs like to review thing going on. which throws me some...

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm allergic to Hinchcliffe.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)

PYRAMINTS OF MUTHERFUCKING MARS though, come on?!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean it's even the story that nathan watches in ep 1 of Queer as Folk

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Pyramids of Mars?? HATE HATE VOMIT

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I actually slipped into a coma during that one in fact

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

u r so NOT gay

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

The whole Hinchcliffe era had no sense of humour. None. I hate them all, except Weng-Chiang which is sufficiently kooky. Oh and Leela sucks.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Now's a bad time to admit I bought The Curse of Fenric last week.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh and Leela sucks.

MADNESS.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

curse of fenric v "I have endured an eternity of darkness and impotence!"


only joking, i would love CoF if it wasn't for all that embarassing stuff with ace. they try to get her to act, and she's not up to it. pretty lady though. bless you, sophie.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Ace would have been SO MUCH BETTER had that character been portrayed by pretty much any other actress in the Who pantheon except Lalla "I am a blonde plank of wood" Ward.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Urgh Lalla Ward. I don't get all the hype about her.

Mary Tamm, on the other hand. WOOF!!

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - Including Bonnie Langford?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Bonnie Langford was miscast and had a shit wardrobe and screamed too much, but you could never fault her acting.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Was shocked to see Mary Tamm in the 1976 film of "The Likely Lads" recently, in quite a substantial part.

Hartnell era: for a certain sort of do, erm, any from "The Web Planet"... otherwise, The Time Meddler 4 I have always found a wonderful one.
Troughton: The Mind Robber 1. Believe me; this is a brilliantly self-contained episode. Bizarre, surreal yet pared down like a psychodrama.
Pertwee: The Green Death 6 (end of an era and all that, sniff sniff... very poignant final scenes)
T. Baker: The Androids of Tara 1 (Stones of Blood would also be a good call)
Davison: agree on Black Orchid, though maybe ep. 1 of that?
C. Baker: if you want slightly dispiriting madness, go for TOATL 8 (Mindwarp 4; a weird mix of tones), otherwise, yeah, TOATL 13. Any from the Vervoids one would be a big error...!
McCoy: Ghost Light 1: magnificent, as much of the final season is. A more offbeat choice: Survival 1...

Tom May (Tom May), Thursday, 17 March 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Bonnie Langford ... could never fault her acting"

!!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 17 March 2005 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Completely agree on Mind Robber 1! Possibly one of the greatest things ever filmed under the Doctor Who banner.

I also agree that the problem with Bonnie Langford was not her acting; rather it was the direction given to her. If you look at the character description of Melanie Bush, you see a screeching, overbearing turbo-harpy that should be smacked with sticks... and that's precisely the character she portrayed. The only way the books made Mel bearable was to turn her into a completely different character.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

OH. MY. GOD.

OH. MY. GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, so where is this trailer again?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 March 2005 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

SCREW THE TRAILER AND GO STRAIGHT TO THE TORRENT LINKED UPTHREAD

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I sincerely hope that's a good OH MY GOD.

Ned: Get the trailer as well. The full episode's incredibly utterly superlatively awesome, but the trailer's pretty mind-blowing too. Trailer here.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, that looks like Doctor Who: the Poochie Years. jsl.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 March 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(based just on the "running in slow motion down a tunnel, in front of a fireball" trailer)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 March 2005 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"running in slow motion down a tunnel, in front of a fireball" = 2nd best thing in any film.

#1 = ppl sitting around computer in darkened room, tappity tap on the keyboard, and then someone says "we're in"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 17 March 2005 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

re Hinchcliffe laffs: Brain of Morbius!!!!!!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 17 March 2005 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

MIND FIGHT!

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Thursday, 17 March 2005 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

has every single Dr Who story been mentioned yet?

Sven Bastard (blueski), Thursday, 17 March 2005 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Not even close.

If it's COMEDY LAFFS you want for your party, you could do worse than Ep 4 of The Celestial Toymaker. Watch in horror as Peter Purves gets led astray by a fat Bunter-a-like!

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"even a sponge has more life than i"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 17 March 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Although, before Dan says it, Celestial Toymaker does feature the Dodo/Steven companion set which isn't very good. And the Doctor isn't actually in it much.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha poor Dodo!

Seriously, I want to move to the UK now.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)

For all the times it seems like a drawback (high cost of living, unavailability of various things, the weather) ACTUALLY HAVING A CONFIRMED BROADCAST DATE for Doctor Who makes it worthwhile.

There's been a good debate on OG about why the US Networks might be loathe about taking this on: the basic conclusion is that using The Office and Coupling as a template then Doctor Who will more than likely end up on BBC America. The Americans on there would favour to broadcast it otherwise, based on its treatment of Hornblower, or that Nick, ABC Family, Fox Kids or WAM! might also be suitable, depending on how it's pitched. To those who understand what these US channels actually mean, is this a sensible stance?

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

would favour A&E to broadcast it otherwise

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

The most likely American channels for the new Who series are:

PBS (historical reasons)
BBC America (obvious lineage reasons)
Sci-Fi Network (obvious content reasons)

I would be amazed if Nick, ABC Family or Fox Kids was interested in showing this. A&E would never ever show anything like this show in a million years.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Sci-Fi have apparently confirmed they're not interested at all. It "doesn't fit the corporate image". I read something somewhere that cast real doubt on PBS too.

The rumour mill has an April announcement on broadcasts, possibly for June transmission. USA Network has been mentioned in the same breath...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

ihttp://img14.imgspot.com/u/05/74/06/Picture1.jpg

Just because I can.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Or can't. Image size, probably.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

This would TOTALLY make sense on USA!

Sci-Fi has shown in the past that they are run by douchebags so their non-interest doesn't surprise me. ("Hm, this doesn't look quite shitty enough to meet our precise standards, sorry.")

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, why you so sad? They're ALWAYS making innovative made-for-SciFi TV movies just for YOU! (And sadly, half of them seem to be wasting Bruce Campbell.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The final straw that made me take Sci-Fi off of my favorites list was when I was flipping channels and they were showing this.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Sci-Fi have apparently confirmed they're not interested at all. It "doesn't fit the corporate image".

Dan's right. Too few explosions, too much actual drama.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Sci-Fi found it 'lacking' apparently. Lacking what? Off-the-shoulder shots of spaceships? All-American cast? Perfunctory dénouement? Tits?

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

You may be onto something with 2 and (especially) 4; this is the channel that thought Lexx was a good idea, remember.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 March 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Ugh.

In other news, Australia still doesn't have a buyer.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

MANSQUITO

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 March 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

pbs probably can't afford it. bbca is the best hope for this but they're idiots and not really affiliated with the bbc. torrent is my friend.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 17 March 2005 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the ABC not being able to afford it is why it's not making a move. Although it has said it's interested, and wants to see ALL 13 EPISODES IN COMPLETED FORM before making a decision, and even then it'll be held off until 2006. Like, schyeah whatever.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd rather see that money spent on local drama.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the BBC really worried about how much it can make selling this to the US this time? I was under the impression that the main reason the last revival didn't work with FOX was that it was a joint production and FOX didn't like the ratings and w/out FOX money the BBC couldn't afford to do it. Hopefully CGI and stuff has gotten cheap enough that they don't need to worry about big US money to bankroll it.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 17 March 2005 23:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the BBC will keep it going if it does well in the UK. DVD sales alone will foot a massive portion of the bill [the Universal coproduction never had that].

Of greater concern is Brits complaining because their licence fee is being tipped heavily in favour of one show.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 17 March 2005 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"un film de Tibor Takács"

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 17 March 2005 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't tell what's not finished about this episode, it looks quite good. It's funny too; Eccleston's Dr. is a bit of an ass, not Colin Baker-level ass though. Theme music: not really changed, is it? I don't like the new logo, it looks like a Starbucks interior, but otherwise this was a really good start. It just seemed modern in ways it hasn't since about 1982.

he does seem to have a crush on her, doesn't he?

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Theme music: not really changed, is it?

It's not the new theme music, because that wasn't finished when they did this cut of the episode.

he does seem to have a crush on her, doesn't he?

Apparently it gets crushier.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

In fact have a listen to the 50-sec BBC1 trailer for the new theme music.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

they should just use the KLF Timelords one

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

r.e. the evening's viewing: I presume you're not including audio episodes? ;) If so, one could certainly add for McGann "The Holy Terror", or indeed "Power of the Daleks 1", which remains magnificent, in an out-of-grasp way, listening to the audio.

Anyone see the 'Culture Show' (BBC2) portion on the new DW last evening?

Tom May (Tom May), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I could get those audio episodes easily.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)

As do I; if money were to wanton spare, I'd buy a load of the BFs. I do however have quite a few of the ahem, fan reconstructions, which are seriously good work the best of them. Allowing you to be at some point midway inbetween listening and imagining and actually watching, dint of the telesnaps' authenticity.

Tom May (Tom May), Friday, 18 March 2005 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone see the 'Culture Show' (BBC2) portion on the new DW last evening?

*waves*

For some reason, the presenter's face reminded me rather of Tom Baker.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 18 March 2005 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)

was he picking deliberately bad clips or was it all like that?

in a *completely unrelated question*, if i had a 66M file to upload somewhere how would i do it?

koogs (koogs), Friday, 18 March 2005 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I tuned in to the Culture Show to find that I'd missed Damien Hirst, but saw the clips of Dr. Who. That was a nice consolation prize. I'm scared because he said that they'd made it... "cool". I'm not sure what that means. Sigh.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Friday, 18 March 2005 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)

No audio episodes at the party but I do have a few.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 18 March 2005 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i saw the ad featuring a spaceship slicing through Big Ben - what's all that about? it looked good enough anyway

Sven Bastard (blueski), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

if i had a 66M file to upload somewhere how would i do it?

www.yousendit.com

Sven Bastard (blueski), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

tho if you're still on dial-up it might not work properly

Sven Bastard (blueski), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I have been dressing as the Eccles Doctor for a couple of weeks now, and somebody noticed for the first time tonight (by coming up snd saying "Do you want to come with me?"). I was strangely impressed.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 19 March 2005 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I was drunk when I wrote that, otherwise I might have noticed how sad it sounded...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Sunday, 20 March 2005 08:36 (twenty-one years ago)

those mastermind questions... argh.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 21 March 2005 10:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I've only watched a few older dr who episodes so I'd like to know; has attraction between th'dr. and an assistant ever even been hinted at before like it seems to be in this one if only slightly?

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 21 March 2005 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)

if you ignore the mcgann movie - which you must - i think the answer is no. compassion and strong paternal motivation has been the end of it.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 21 March 2005 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not true! Doctor and Romana had nothing of the paternal about it.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 21 March 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate's right, City Of Death shows a couple in full-on shagmonster territory. In real life, obviously, not in the show, but it completely overspills into all the episodes surrounding then - some of the dialogue in The Leisure Hive is exactly that of a married couple.

6th Doctor and Peri were at it like rabbits, I always thought. And the 3rd Doctor is obviously upset and jealous when Jo Grant finds a husband (Green Death).

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 21 March 2005 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)

There was also that episode of "The Keys Of Marinus" where The Doctor keeps squeezing Barbara's booty and leering, "Yeah baby, shake it for daddy!"

(Pete's much better at this than I am.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 21 March 2005 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

**And the 3rd Doctor is obviously upset and jealous when Jo Grant finds a husband.**

Yes, the dullard Sgt. Benson is utterly unworthy of the total horn-goddess Jo.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Except it's not him, it's Professor Jones.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)

City Of Death shows a couple in full-on shagmonster territory. In real life, obviously, not in the show, but it completely overspills into all the episodes surrounding then - some of the dialogue in The Leisure Hive is exactly that of a married couple.

Is that involving the actress who's now married to Richard Dawkins?

(I cannot remember her name - I am a failure when it comes to Doctor Who trivia)

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, Lalla Ward. There's a lovely story about an un-named former wife of TB in the back of his autobiography which may well be her.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Jo liked flakey Mike Yates out of UNIT, poor Benton wasn't even in the running.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 21 March 2005 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)

agreed that city of death is obv tom and lalla deeply in love - all that hand-holding location stuff running around paris is part of the story's charm. but the characters were never written more than companions. even with the fabulous bickering dialogue stuff "Don't you think so K9?"

Jo's leaving is close, but what's portrayed is still just the loss you would get in a close relationship. there's poss more emotion in the partings of tegan??

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 21 March 2005 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the Third Doctor is far worse than that over Jo - there's the whole flouncing off in the huff to Metebelis 3 as well.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 21 March 2005 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I had a theory for a good long while that Tegan was sleeping with the 5th Doctor after "Arc of Infinity", which is why he was so devastated when she ran out on him (seriously, her departure is one of the most shattering moments in the series' entire history).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 21 March 2005 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

If he didn't try it on with Romana I there's something wrong with him. Seriously.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 21 March 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Yr right - it wasn't Benton.

This :

http://members.aol.com/corgibox/new.html

is good. **(But you might not want it popping up on your WORK computer)**

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think they ever really credited Benton with much of an emotional life did they? I suppose that was better than the scarcely credible 'heterosexual bit of alright' mantle thrust upon Captain Yates!

People are right to bring "The Green Death" up, c.f. the Doctor having romantic feelings; Jo is clearly more than just a friend to him. It also rather unrelatedly (?) contains scenes of the Doctor in drag, and Yates starting his 'divided loyalties' stage... ;)

No, I've never seen too much in the Tegan-5th Doc 'relationship', but that's probably as its an era of the show I am repelled by, barring stuff like "Enlightenment" and "Black Orchid". Davison was good, and played it very emotionally at times, but seems to me like a man adrift, amidst all manner of folly.

No, it's certainly "Green Death" for me; and aren't Jo and Prof. Jones the best couple of the series? (ha ha, I certainly think they beat the Harris' of "Fury from the Deep" ;)) I do bar Tom and Lalla from this, as the off-screen dominates the on-screen there, whereas this is purely fictional and beautifully acted.

Tom May (Tom May), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Jo and Prof Jones are the best couple because Prof Jones basically is the Doctor, except younger and a version who'll shag her while he patronises her.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I was watching the reconstruction of Fury From The Deep, and the Harris' are quite, quite brilliant.

"Oh darling, you can't even boil an egg!"
"Well, that's what you get for marrying a scientist, dear."

Last night I also came up with a theory that Turlough doesn't kill the Doctor because he realises he fancies him, and Tegan ends up leaving in Ressurection because she can't supress her feelings for the Doctor any more - well, not with him and Turlough conducting a full-blown gay shagfest through the wall in the TARDIS anyway.

But that could have been bollocks.

Benton's emotional life is sort of explained in the War Game fanfilm, see my review in the "Not Doctor Who" thread.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

This is all smokescreen for Nyssa/5thDr at it all over the time rotor

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Ways I can tell I'm getting old: I saw one of the new series trailers again last night and my main reaction was: "hang on, isn't Rose's skirt a bit too short for Doctor Who?"

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

SOMETHING FOR THE DADS

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Bump.

After watching Doctor Who: A New Dimension I am beside myself with excitement, spoileriffic though it was.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Indeed, looked great stuff! Likewise, the montage shown on Jonathan Ross last night.

Gosh, half an hour until new, proper Dr Who is back on our screens...! Been waiting for this since the 6th of December 1989. ;)

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Who am I trying to kid, I felt a bit of a flutter when the countdown screensaver went below 1 hour. 20 minutes to go. Killing time is killing me.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahahahahaha! (damn I wish I was in the UK)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, that was absolutely brilliant.

Americans, ph32r my UK l1v1ng sk1llz...

I'm off to the pub now to rant about it, while Doctor Who Confidential tapes.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

That was great, I'm no big fan of it previously but that was a really good bit of telly, Dr. Who or not. Things worked really well - bad CGI is the new bad latex - Billie is classic assistant material - Eccleston seemed eccentric enough and all those lovely, lovely plot-holes! Top stuff.

Webb Friendly (Webb Friendly), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Did anyone get 3 seperate blasts of fucking Graham Norton during the first few minutes of the show? I hope someone gets a good talking to for that it almost buggered up his first scene.

mzui (mzui), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I enjoyed it too - it looked good, Ecclestone is excellent, and there were some very funny lines.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic!

(no Graham Norton on the transmission up here, fortunately)

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks Caitlin, must have been a Sky/Digital thing.

mzui (mzui), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

No, we got that as well...

Never really watched it before, but I loved that. Why has no-one allowed Christopher Eccleston to be funny before?

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)

"Lots of planets have a north"

Webb Friendly (Webb Friendly), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i enjoyed it a lot.

Reminded me of those occasional CBBC dramas that are good.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Saturday, 26 March 2005 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

We didn't have any transmission probs - I thought it was great. I never watched any when I was growing up anyway. Now I'm going to watch Farscape now on BBC 3 in a few minutes. I'm really enjoying BBC3 lately, specially Casanova on Sundays too!

marianna, Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Lots of planets have a north" would have been a great line if I hadn't read it in *every* Doctor Who-related newspaper article in the part two weeks.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Nah, it wasn't transmission problems, just an idiot on the sound desk who periodically faded up the noise from the Strictly Dance Fever set during the opening ten minutes (see: the cheering noises when Rose enters the room of mannequins, plus occasional bursts of Norton talking during her walking through said room).

Should not spoil it one bit, though. The best thing was it getting the lightness of touch absolutely dead on - somehow the humour was almost always perfectly judged. Hardly anything does that nowadays, but Eccleston was just totally brilliant at it (c.f. Timothy Dalton's horrid, horrid performance in 'The Living Daylights' last night. Some people can quip, some people can't. Timothy Dalton most definitely can't). He made him likeable was the thing - quipping characters usually come off as cunts, but there was something essential about him... bloody brilliant.

x-post - This is what happens when you read things.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

how different was it from the leaked version? just the music?

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, hang on - yes, we *did* get that. Duh me.

(xpost)

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Kraftwerk should sue.

NickB (NickB), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I really enjoyed it, watched Pyramids Of Mars today on UKGold to get me in the mood, one minor quibble was the rubbish Peter Gunn style bit of music they used for some of the action scenes, but otherwise Yay squared!

mzui (mzui), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

My favourite bit was Eccleston's look when he said "It's a disguise!" about the TARDIS. He was so proud of it, which I thought was amusing.

I liked it a lot. It did everything it needed to, catered to the fans enough to not distract from the main plot (I thought the Internet guy could have been too much, but it was okay in the end), and it was exciting! (Plus, the font they used for the credits - harking back to CBBC of yore, which was nice).

The effects were, well, not jaw-dropping, but at least as good as say an episode of Buffy or Angel, and I did like the low-rent T1000 dummy…

OH! from watching the BBC3 thing afterwards - is that a hint of a UNIT story? *nerdglee*

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

it looks so cheap.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

There's an interesting point: the 1970s series look cheap *now*, but how cheap did they look *then* by comparison with other TV that was around at the time? And is that better or worse than the current series?

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it's strange, it looks like a lot of money has been spent on it but at the same time so cheap. hm.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

too much sonic screwdriver!

and those routemasters are already anachronistic to anyone living in london.

dr sounded like andy from little britain at times. 'yeah, i know'.

was norton on terrestrial feed as well as digital feed?

minor criticisms though, makes me wish they hadn't waited 16 years.

interweb nutter was the evil bloke with shiny eyes in second coming. also in bob and rose i think.

billie surprisingly ok. good even.

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

> Kraftwerk should sue.

haven't they done the showroom dummies thing before? culture show piece made mention of not going shopping in ealing high street and showed dummies.

or was that the avengers. or the uglie wugglies? 8)

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

haven't they done the showroom dummies thing before?

Back in 1970. I don't think Kraftwerk would have a leg to stand on.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha! Fie! Never too much sonic screwdriver!!!

I was confused by the overlapping Norton sounds. When Billie walked into the basement, i thought someone had thrown her a surprise party or something.

All in all, I was impressed, though Eccleston was great, brought out the natural arrogance of the Doctor in a really appealing way. (Though I'm not sure about the Dr's "Shut up")

And Suzy is shouting at me that I have to confess or she will tell that I was so scared by the killer wheelie bin that I hid behind a blanket and did not come out until the mannekins were killed.

Random trainspotter complaint: as they ran across the bridge to the London Eye (great plot device! the Eye is EEEEEEEVIL!!!) an N159 went by -headed for "London Bridge." Any fule who lives in Steatham know, the N133 goes to London bridge, the N159 goes to Marble Arch. Humph!

kate at suzy's (suzy), Saturday, 26 March 2005 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Excellent and for proof that it lives up to it's heritage, my 10 year old son hiding behind the sofa asking if it was safe to watch.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm. The special on BBC3 afterwards suggested that they actually were waiting for red buses to go by when they were filming to get those shots.

We did have that weird sound Graham Norton thing, but I thought it was supposed to be a TV on in the background or something. :/

marianna, Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

dr. was a bit too "weee" and walked funny.

OK, though.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Bus problems aside it was terrrrrific. North, Rose walking around the tardis. Plastic boyfriend!!! Real actual acting sez Shabazzz and and and.

We watched it twice and it was brilliant.

The London Eye gag was also grebt. Billies mum was in Nuns On The Run and the Doctor Who website was great. Let's all try search-wise.net

8.5 out a spurious ten. (with Pyramids Of Man Shagging Mars ten out of)

Pete (Pete), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I loved it - better than I expected and I'd started to expect quite a bit. All the main speaking parts excellent. I can see the potential for Ecclestone's Dr to annoy me if he gets more "wa-hey!" but the potential for him to delight me is much greater. Made me forget about the old series (despite having just watched 3 hours of it...)

Yes PLASTIC BOYFRIEND!

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I really didn't think Eccleston had it in him. He was excellent.

Masked Gazza, Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I must also say that they were clearly heading south over Westminster bridge and hence the N159 heading to Streatham garage was totally correct. The heresy of showing the 12 as still being a routemaster only just served to hurt me more but proves that BILLIE LIVES IN SOUTH LONDON HURRAH!

This is Sarah by the way. Shabazz. Lucretia My Reflection. OH WHATEVER

Alter Mangus (Total Magnus), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, more "wa-hey" than "weee", I guess.

I have a question, about dr. whos: do peter cushing and paul mcgann count to the tally?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

DON'T READ MY EMAILS!

Best quasi-racist character ever!

(McGann counts, Cushing doesn't)

Also, point being that that first episode could have occurred on year in the future when all the bendy buses have been scrapped and the Routemaster IS BACK! And when the NWhoeverthefuckcares has been re-routed to Streatham.

Matt DC not Magnus (Total Magnus), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

rubbish, crap, but still enjoyable, I'll not watch anymore mind.

I laughed a fair bit, but not where they wanted me to I fear.

"he has a constant companion.....DEATH"

bollocks, creased me up though

Vicky (Vicky), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

mcgann yes, cushing no.

big quibble: the doctor looks at himself at Rose's in the mirror, says, "eh, not bad....big ears though" or something, which seems to hint that he just recently regenerated and hasn't seen himself yet. But if that's true, HOW COME THERE ARE LIKE 70 PICTURES OF HIM ON THE WEB in this incarnation? I find it hard to believe he was at the kennedy assassination in 63 and managed to miss a mirror!

although maybe he hasn't been to those places YET.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

why mcgann yes cushing no?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

YET!

That threw me, but then I realised, just like Merlin, and as you said, he hasn't done them yet.

And it must be awful being a Who conspiracy theorist. What with the 8th Doctor spending the whole 20th century on Earth, the 3rd's Exile, and all the others, there must be so many conflicting appearances…

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

cushing wasn't a bbc production, wasn't an "alien", wasn't linked to the other doctors (mcgann regenerated on screen from McCoy's doctor), and McGann's doctor continued off screen in audio BBC stories for years.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

The only people who hate it seem to be the ones who insist on comparing it with Paradise Towers.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:50 (twenty-one years ago)

BUT IT DOES GO TO STREATHAM GARAGE

Also NB I am going to kill myself under aforesaid bus on my way home tonight for being quite so utterly geeky.

I think personally my only poor point for the show was the unnecessary death of the webmaster who's stalking Chris Eckles and his Tun around TIME AND SPACE. Not a shark jumping moment but just slightly pointless I felt.

Dalek Invasion 2150 = utterly mad but earth = dalek patio hurrah.

Shabazzz (Total Magnus), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:50 (twenty-one years ago)

paradise towers was great!

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

ohh, I see.

didn't know about mcgann's audio. why didn't they use him again? wanted publicity of a new dr. and other stuff? shame we didn't see eccleston's regeneration.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think they used him because he probably didn't want to do it, and on top of that, they wanted a totally fresh start (which is why they also didn't talk about regeneration; they want the rare person who doesn't know anything about the show to be able to turn it on and enjoy it as something new)`

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the regeneration going to be in The Gallifrey Chronicles? (as well as the Big Reset Button that I'm imagining is going to be pressed along the way)

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

what is that?

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I wouldn't be surprised if there are barely any old series continuity references, probably none to do with regenerations - notice he doesn't say he's fought the Autons before, in fact you get set up for a new (or more recent) backstory with his going on about "the war" and so on. My guess is that this is essentially a reboot, it's just Davies and co. can't actually call it that.

(Of course that backstory may be some 8th doctor novels/audio thing I know zero about, but I doubt it.)

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

what is that?

Book.

Lance Parkin hasn't said what will happen in the book, and good thing too.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 26 March 2005 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the last 8th Doctor book that's coming out sometime this year. A lot of things have changed since the McGann TV film - Dan can probably explain it much better that I could, but most people are assuming that the 'TV order' will be put back by this book.

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

someone give a quick 8th dr. storyline synopsis for those of us geeky enough to care but not geeky enough to go read a hundred books and search for audio stories!

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah Dan - More Doctor Who Book reviews.

Alter Mangus (Total Magnus), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Am I correct in presuming that's Chris and not Vicky upthread?

Matt DC (Pete), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes Dan! More reviews!

xpost

spoilers:

Very quick (as it's bloody complicated, and I'm still not sure I understand all of Interference): The Doctor blows up Gallifrey, in a way that means it never existed in the first place. There are apparently four Time Lords left (Romana is one, the Doctor, and I think the Master, but I might be wrong on that). After the destruction of Gallifrey, the Doctor spent the 20th century living on Earth and recuperating (he also lost most of his memory; some of it has returned, but I don't think everything's back yet), before the TARDIS rebuilt itself so he could go travelling in time again. Without the Time Lords, Humans now have greater access to time-travel tech than before, and magic appears to be stronger as well.

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

of course

x-post

Vic laughed too, we were cringing badly

Vicky (Vicky), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Those party episodes in full:

The War Machines Part 1 (mostly for nite klub action)
Evil Of The Daleks Part 2 (cos it has daleks, and none of us had seen it)
Terror Of The Autons Part 3 (autons, John P being arsey to everyone)
The Stones Of Blood Part 2 ("Bicycle!", also K9 vs grass, gravel, etc.)
Terminus Part 2 (my token contrarian Who opinion - this is one of my favourite ever stories, and not just because Nyssa gets into goth make up and takes her skirt off under the influence of 'lazars disease')
Mark Of The Rani Part 2 (up to don't-fear-the-tree fiasco)
Ghost Light Part 1 (because it was the cheapest McCoy in the 2nd hand shop)

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i still haven't seen the last three McCoy stories. I should look for the dvds to rent

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Lazars disease - lezza's disease more like.

I am trying to convince party to watch it for a third time. Hendrick's department store...And Rose has a bit of a tea leaf about her.

Pete (Pete), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

We'll be giving it another spin on Monday I think Pete.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Henrick's was Jenners in Embra wasn't it?

Vicky (Vicky), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Smart money round here sez it was cheap mans Cardiff, but have no proof on that except where production is based.

Pete (Pete), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:37 (twenty-one years ago)

We decided it was a "bit too Sutton" to convince as a central london store.

The Brigadier wouldn't have turned down Billie's mum.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The Brig would have shagged Benton if he had asked.

A big round antenna...

What's even better, next week on Doctor Who...the bad guy is an evil bedsheet with a mouth. Production designs, what production designs...

Pete (Pete), Saturday, 26 March 2005 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i reserve judgement somewhat because this first complete episode will surely be a bit out of step with the rest of the series (resolved in one, obvious introductory aspect of it with big impact factor - use of the Wheel AND Autons just seemed really stupid to me given how little time they had to develop the 'plot'...

but great fun nonetheless for reasons already stated several times over upthread.

it's strange to see British Saturday teatime science fiction on terrestrial TV again - inevitably looked ridiculous as a result - but not ironic thankfully.


Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

http://whoisdoctorwho.co.uk/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/whoisdoctorwho/sightings.shtml

Masked Gazza, Sunday, 27 March 2005 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)

um, aren't most mannequins made of fiberglass?

colette (a2lette), Sunday, 27 March 2005 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

they really could've got better photoshoppers too...

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah I hate the title sequence.

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 27 March 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Henrick's was Jenners in Embra wasn't it?

Nope.

(the building did look rather like Jenners, and also rather like the building a block down that now houses TopShop / Dorothy Perkins et al, but wasn't them - and if it was it would have to have been entirely photoshopped into place, as none of the buildings over the road from those go above street level)

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 March 2005 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

looked *more* like Topshop / Dorothy Perkins / Burtons, I should have said.

ihttp://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/jpgs/3d_moundview.jpg

Jenners is the buildings on the left, from the street corner onwards out of the picture. The Arcadia Group building (ie Topshop, Burtons etc) is the building at centre-right that looks like it has a crane sticking out of the roof.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 27 March 2005 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I watched it in the company of some small children. the three and a half year old was very perturbed by the melting plasic head scene, and was severely traumatised by her mother's casual reminder that there are shop window dummies all over the place in central Dublin. The older lad was quite taken with it, but didn't really get the significance of the TARDIS being bigger on the inside than the out.

What did I think of it? Well, rubbish incidental music, and the usual rubbish re-working of the title music. The acting was good and the humour funny, but maybe there was too much humour? The thing I most didn't like about it, though, was the pacing... unlike a good episode of Star Trek TNG (the same actual length), this seemed very rushed, with not much sense of the story building and then being resolved.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 27 March 2005 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

but by not being rubbish it succeeds.

In after programme conversation, we discussed what you would do if offered the chance to run away in the TARDIS with the Doctor. I think all right thinking poeple would go. But what if just as the Doctor was inviting you in, a once-off door-way to Narnia were to open nearby? And as if that wasn't bad enough, Gandalf suddenly appeared to reveal that he needed YOU to help destroy the One Ring?

We also wondered how it would affect our decisions if the Doctor was being played by Mariah Carey.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 27 March 2005 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, the following day (and having watched it five times now...)

Don't like the title sequence at all, there shouldn't be names on it.
It's far more overtly comedic than I expected it to be, but not necessarily in a bad way.
Eccles' Doctor is probably closest to Tom Baker, in a "fuck it, we're all going to die, might as well have a bit of fun along the way" way.
I thought the wheelie bin could have been handled a lot better (maybe just swallowed when he first looked into it).
I'd have to see one without all the back story, but I didn't like the 45 minute single episode length much. It was all a bit too rushed.

But the good things far outweigh that. It was brilliant, and isn't it great to have Doctor Who back.

< Rose nods at the Millennium Wheel >
Doctor: "Fantastic!"

Sorry again to the Americans, Dan, you should have it Torrented by now I expect...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Sunday, 27 March 2005 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I was thinking another thing... it's a lot less violent than old Dr Who. In the old days if the Autons had shot the internet guy, you would have seen him grimace and fall over, but here it's all off-screen.

What we are really wondering is how scary the Daleks are to our little focus group.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 27 March 2005 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think a sixty-minute special to launch might have been a better idea re. rushed-ness, yeah (and could have got a jump on Ant'n'Dec), but on the other hand it left me wanting more and also, frankly, there isn't a great deal you can do with the autons once you've done the window dummies plus a.n. plastic object, better to get it over with quick.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 10:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the titles were OK - intestinal time tunnel and names are fine, new logo and string arrangements a bit rub. From sulky leaked reports I was dreading the instrumental music but I thought it worked really well, the sped-up everyday-the-same stuff for Rose's intro in particular.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I just watched it, due to having been exiled in the land of no telly last night. I have no real solid memory of old Doctor Who, just vague memories stirred by the new stuff (tardis noise, that sort of thing), so to me it was just a new series,written by Russell T Davies and starring Christopher Eccleston (read: something I would want to watch) rather than having to watch with the reverence afforded to a series of Dr Who by, well, everyone but me. And it was quite watchable.

Once I'd stopped seeing Christopher Eccleston as David Bilborough from Cracker (too many similar mannerisms), it was OK. Silly, pointless, but ultimately OK.

Mark Benton (interweb weirdo) is in SO MANY TV dramas just now, it was no surprise at all to see him in this. Similarly, I will be super-shocked if fellow Second Coming/Bob and Rose star Lesley Sharp doesn't turn up at some point as well.

Also, what Sven B said about the photoshopping. "here he is in the background in dallas in 1963" = "here is a cut-out photo of Chris Eccleston's head pritt-sticked onto a photo of dallas in 1963". I'm sure there is some nostalgic joy for Dr Who fans to be had in such crap effects, but it just looked so wrong.

I liked the one-way conversation with the plastic consciousness thing "I'M TALKING HERE!". Also Billie's "I have no A-levels, no future, but at least I've got a bronze medal in gymnastics, take that, evil plastic things" gung-ho attitude. She's a bit too pouty to take seriously though.

I'll watch again, but in no way does it make me care about watching any previous series. It worked well enough on its own merits for me to enjoy as was.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 March 2005 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)

carsmile and i and others probably lament the absence of Eccleston's ghostly face in the title sequence, which would've been in keeping with the previous series - C Baker and McCoy's faint but stern expressions during the titles always really stuck in my mind - the new title sequence doesn't seem half as powerful as a result

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Once I'd stopped seeing Christopher Eccleston as David Bilborough from Cracker (too many similar mannerisms)

ha, this is the first programme i have seen Eccleston in where he's smiling - and it's understandable given how terrifying he looks when doing this (but in a great way)

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

He was like the version of Bilborough you could imagine if he wasn't working with arsehole coppers like Jimmy Beck and was instead saving the universe from big scary wheelie bins whilst coming to terms with his inner nihilist. I think. I though Bilborough was a totally under-rated character in Cracker (I'm watching the re-runs on ITV3 just now). The Doctor reminded me also of the pre-breakdown version of Eccleston's Shallow Grave character. He was basically a little too much Christopher Eccleston rather than what I (as a non-Dr-Who watcher) think Dr Who should be like.

I think I'll get past this in time.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah the ghostly face would have been nice but on the other hand goes against the 'equal billing for Billie' idea so you can see why it's not there.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't the pacing was rushed so much as mismanaged - the climactic confrontation scene was dragged out rather, for instance.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i am wholly opposed to the idea of Billie's equal billing.

I though Bilborough was a totally under-rated character in Cracker (I'm watching the re-runs on ITV3 just now)

he wasn't really under-rated was he? look at his career trajectory after Cracker, same goes for Robert Carlyle - that particular story is one of McGovern's greatest works but i always thought Eccleston stole the show with his death scene.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

One thing I'm interested in is whether/if/how much Davies and other writers considered the influence of 90s American TV science-fiction here. There doesn't seem to be a huge amount of the post-modern irony that surrounded Buffy as all the humour in the first episode seemed fairly in keeping with Who tradition. And it's as far away from the X-Files as you could get whilst still presenting a sci-fi show with a leading male/female dynamic, tho part of me would like to see SOME X-Files influence incorporated - but by this I think I just mean 'making it more spooky' to counter the humour and i suppose kitschness of it all, if that's actually possible or indeed a good thing to do (i cite X-Files because i think it represented a 90s equivalent better than anything else, despite the similarities being rather tenuous and primordial - of course one outdoes the other in some departments and vice versa). Doesn't it need to be scarier and grimmer? I look forward to seeing if it can.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I think there will be scarier bits and grimmer bits in the rest of the series, judging by what I've read. There'll also be more Buffy-ish emo-with-asides stuff. But I think the first episode is more about establishing the concepts and a baseline tone (saving the universe is fun!).

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Your career trajectory theory would only disprove my point if it was his acting that I felt was under-rated rather than his character.

I think, however, maybe I mean I under-rated the character myself the first time I watched it. The earlier episodes, before "To Be A Somebody" and his excellent death scene, he was just there the first time round for me, and the whole Fitz/Penhaligon/Beck dynamic was more in the forefront from me. Watching it again, I found Bilborough a much more rounded and likeable character than I'd previously given him credit for.

And I thought he brought that strength and that cynicism and that passion to Dr Who as well. Yes, he's an actor and is doing what he's told to an extent, but I do think he has something of himself he brings to all his roles. I just never noticed it until recently.

(xpost)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

(continued xposts)

Don't you think X-Files has now become as kitsch as old Dr Who, Steve? I think if I saw an episode now it would be pretty risible.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not sure Tom - i should watch a few again. X-Files had it's INTENTIONALLY kitsch moments but most of the time it was so stony-faced and earnest, even when things got TOO ridiculous (Mudler may as well have been abducted by SHARKS, DYS?!) for the last few seasons, and that became a problem (inferior cast too - despite fab Robert Patrick), but I still love it for the most part.

re Ecclescakes, maybe the accent is still a factor too much, seeming so distinctive. He seems to live and die by it. The 'North' gag placating this a little, esp. after Peter Kay's seemingly derisive (tho not really i spose) 'The Doctor's a scally!' quip the other week. I like his accent a lot, but it may well still make you think Chris Eccleston instead of TEH DOC TOR.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not his accent, I don't think. It's him, his mannerisms, his attitude - I obviously can't explain it, even to myself, so I will give up.

I just rewatched the start, and we didn't get the Graham Norton thing here (BBC Scotland, not through digital).

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought Eccleston was excellent, he has that same sort of wide-eyed but ever-so-slightly creepy sense of humour that Tom Baker had. Pipers acting was ok, but as a friend of mine pointed out her character seems to be based on Jade Goody. Rubbish bits - the incidental music was annoying and the photoshopping was terrible, even i could do better!

zappi (joni), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

let's PROVE we can do better! i can't think of a better way to spend the next hour other than grafting Eccley's face into the JFK assassination...

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)

what was the JFK assassination bit all about anyway?

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 27 March 2005 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

To prove that the Doctor is a harbinger of DOOM (see also "he has a constant companion - DEATH"). The crew of Red Dwarf were there also, I'm surprised with all these timetravellers there was room in the town for dodgy men on grassy knolls and Lee Harvey Oswald.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 27 March 2005 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Billie will be fine in the role - the innocent getting caught up in events beyond her comprehension part is a thankless one, but the volunteer learning about fabulous new things is a much richer role, and knowing how well Davies writes I'm certain she'll have material to work with. The only role I've seen her in before was when she plays a singer who gets involved with an asshole (marrying one seemed to me to be taking The Method a bit far), I think in some sort of modern Canterbury Tales series. She was very good in that.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 27 March 2005 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I enjoyed it, better than nathan barley.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 27 March 2005 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

The stuttering cut with the plastic boyfriend made me nostalgic for kids TV like Children of the Dog Star and other indie "TV can be surprising!" bits. I'm glad there's something surprising on the telly again, which is why I view Sven's idea of breeding this with the X-Files as utter madness, and also why I'm glad that the internet mentalist doesn't become a recurring figure. Well, mostly glad.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 27 March 2005 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

(On rereading I'm unwisely inferring that Steve-who-I'll-stop-calling-Sven-now is advocating these things instead of just asking the questions).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 27 March 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4385801.stm

10 million!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

note to slowpokes: just bcz an photoshopped pic can be discovered on the interweb can be found DOES NOT PROVE that character x wz at event y

the rubness of the phoshopping is not (necesarily) an "hommage" to ancient poor dr who sfx, it could also be a commentary on the fact that the interweb is populated by pranksters and their easily deluded victims

the doctor's first advice to billie was: "don't tell anyone about this, you'll get them killed"
but she did: and the person she told got killed
his expression just before he was killed - which this actor is very good at - was "oh great! i have been right all along so now i must die" (ie equal parts validated and crestfallen) (also he clearly knew about the autons)
but in other news (cf above) just bcz he had found "proof" of the doctor's presence here there and everywhere doesn't mean the doctor had ever been there THIS IS THE INTERWEB PPL if you use it for fact-checking you will be sorry

eccleston's faintly overdone jokiness needn't be part of how he interracts with billie now she's on-board: at that point he was trying after all to get her to ignore and forget him

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)

nicely handled: the problem of present-day earthside carnage no longer occurring in a media blackout

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

eccleston: bastard doctor or nice doctor?

to date (excluding cushing who is merely lame) it goes:
bastard
nice
bastard
nice (tho very annoying) (this is a personal opinion: i am not a big TB fan)
nice
bastard
nice
nice (is that right for mcgann? i never watched it)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

nice bastard

Nice Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm, McCoy had the air of nice, but he did blow up Skaro, which is something the Fifth Doctor, for example, wasn't prepared to do…

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i actually didn't watch *that* much SMc either, to be honest

(the very first dr who moment i remember is actually repeated in the second dr who movie, tho i don't know if the TV prog still exists on vid --- but i'm just abt to blog abt that movie on freaky trigger so i won't spoil it here)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Looking forward to your comments, Mark. Can't really get a worse rap than the first Cushing, eh? ;)

I really rather liked the new show; there may be quibbles, but a broadly *right* reintroduction: stuff like the Doctor 'giving the Nestene Consciousness a chance', and not actually doing so, just giving them a prolongued talking-to! and nearly being killed because of this.

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

First episode. Give it a chance.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I certainly am - and I repeat, I liked it - and have detected only the odd negative view on this thread.

And I liked the above Doctor-Nestene scene I mention; encapsulates the Doctor's sense of fair play - which is not always brought into practice. :)

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 27 March 2005 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not his actual real fairplay, it's his need loudly to dramatise his utter conviction that he alone understands the idea of fairplay (in fact grasp of fairplay is generally what his companion is there for) (not death, i mean his human companion)

(i am of the "real doctor = bastard" school) (it's my age)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Regarding the books. SPOILERIFIC if you haven't read them.

The Eight Doctors nominally took up where the crap movie left off, and he visited his previous eight incarnations. I don't know why because I haven't read it. Then, in the next book he met Sam, who became his companion for a time.

In Alien Bodies the Faction Paradox is introduced, being some cult that spends its time screwing about with the timelines and changing history and being generally perverted. Doing things that should be impossible, e.g. members going back in time and impregnating their own mothers [probably not THAT, but things like that].

Later in Doctor Who and The Taint he meets Fitz, who becomes a companion, and in Interference we encounter Compassion, a Faction member, who becomes a de facto companion of sorts. I think. Then she turns into a TARDIS. Yes, a TARDIS. Don't ask.

Sam leaves at some point but I don't know when. Then, in The Ancestor Cell, the Doctor blows up the Faction and his home planet of Gallifrey, and as a result loses his memory of this whole incident, as well as who he is and what he does. In the next six books he wanders about Earth for 100 years not knowing who he is and not having a time machine, but it turns out it was in his pocket all along! And WHAM, suddenly his TARDIS grows to full size and he's a time traveller again.

In the next book he meets Anji Kapoor who becomes a companion that everyone hates. So for the next 3495703472309 books it's the Doctor, Fitz and Anji doing things in space and time, forgetting [or not knowing] Gallifrey's gone.

Then, in The Adventuress of Henrietta Street, some fat bloke called Sabbath is introduced, who does loads of evil things [don't ask me what, I'm only halfway through this book as we speak]. The 'Sabbath arc' continues on for some time, and by most accounts isn't very good. Halfway through this arc a woman called Beatrix stows away in the TARDIS Adric-style, and Anji leaves at some point. Eventually Sabbath is defeated or it turns out to be all just a dream or something.

So, currently we have the still-amnesiac eighth Doctor, Fitz, Trix and no Gallifrey. The Gallifrey Chronicles, the final book in the eighth Doctor series, is believed to wrap up the long-suspended Gallifrey plotline and somehow do away with both Trix and Fitz. Regeneration status is also not known, but it's believed there won't be one. It's out in June.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, END SPOILER for the books

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's aimed very well at a simulataneously younger and older audience than things like Buffy, and so it doesn't have to compete with them. It's Saturday (or Sunday, if you're watching on BBC3) tea time viewing, during which time Mams and seven year-olds are sitting down to watch telly and all respectable tweenies (or whatever the hell they're called) are mooching around the streets. So I don't think that's a problem.

severely traumatised by her mother's casual reminder that there are shop window dummies all over the place in central Dublin

I was scared by these bits. I DO NOT LIKE things that shamble slowly towards you in an inexorable fashion.

Our Ed, who was looking forward to this as much as I was, was very disappointed that a consciousness able to control all plastic was only able to control showroom dummies and nothing else, and he wondered how many department stores really do have guns concealed in the hands of their mannequins? But I scoffed at him because I thought it was brilliant.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

r.e. Mark: Oh, I think both approaches are equally effective, and yet always, a fluidity: in "The Time Meddler" Hartnell verges from jocular old cove to vindictive japester, when he effectively sentences the time-lord Monk to live in the incipient Norman Britain for all time... And Troughton is quite a bastard in "The Evil of the Daleks"; playing games with his companion, much as in the later McCoy episodes.

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I certainly am - and I repeat, I liked it - and have detected only the odd negative view on this thread.

That's true. Anyway I loved 'Rose' to pieces; in fact so far I think it's the best first-Doctor story ever. Which is really saying something.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Difficult to compare with four-parters like "Castrovalva" (a classic IMO, but not so much in the first two episodes, which make up more than the running time of "Rose"). I would agree it was definitely a stronger piece of television than "Robot", "Twin Dilemma", "Time and the Rani" and "The TV Movie". I can't comment for "Power of the Daleks" as it doesn't exist in the archives, and "Spearhead"'s a tough call, but on balance I'd agree that "Rose" is better: more economical and a far better resolution.

Only "An Unearthly Child" is a better opening IMO, though only if you consider the first episode there in isolation. ;)

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

There was a lot to do in this first episode -- establish mood, establish characters and interactions, explain who the Doctor is, explain what the TARDIS is, start and finish a plot, &c. There wasn't a lot of room for much else so they did a brilliant job. The next few episodes will tell [quite a mix of story styles, I believe].

xpost: I agree mostly, but Castrovalva horrifies me, not so much for the story as the execution. Bloody Nathan-Turner was in his "I'll change this fucker if it's the last thing I ever do" phase.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i liked dodo in the WH ep that tom found :(

i liked wotan better though

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Thye Doctor as bastard trope is often misunderstood as Doctor as meddler, and what he meddles in best is his companions lives. Hence late doors McCoy constantly "challenging" Ace. If Eccleston's Doctor is to do this (and already it seems he might be) it will be an adventure through space and time to convinve Billie to do her A-Levels.

Watching it again on BBC3 with a 60 year-old Eccleston hater and 29 year old nostalgia couldn't care-less-nik I did not feel embaressed and they really liked it. Though unanimous aprobation on the bin burp.

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i LOVED castrovalva at the time: don't know what i'd think now though

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the bin burp wd have been best if a backwards baseball bap cap had been belched out

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

My wife reckons he looks like Al Bundy. She's taken up calling it Doctor Bundy.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

r.e. Wotan: "Dr Who is required. Bring him here!", or some such. I suppose one has to be grateful that Cushing's *human* Dr Who didn't suddenly appear. Good story, and indeed including the Dr Who *standby* of hapless tramp/vagrant/poacher/yokel figure who figures merely as a presumably deserving victim. :)

Castrovalva: Brilliant concepts though, the Escher city that doesn't actually exist... and the visualisation of *that* was rather good. Otherwise, I agree with you, production cock-ups do abound, as often in the era - including Anthony Ainley being encouraged by JNT to ham it up. I am sure that a good core of the story would stand up today, though indeed not all of the elements surrounding it.

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Oddly the rewatching illustrated actually how measured Rose was as an episode. It had an awful lot to do, and did not rush it. Mainly Rose does not need to like the Doctor until the end - and even then we're not sure (though the slo-mo run & smile clinches it). Women I were with were very, very impressed with Bille: "she's not stick thin, but she's very attractive".

Not sure about being to see the interior of the Tardis from the outside. But I hope to see a swimming pool in there somewhere along the line.

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

i kind of took it for granted that russell t.d. wz gnna be able to deliver a perfectly formed compact FUNCTIONAL ep: he's bad w.endings to date, i think, but excellent w.transitional-passage eps (ie what this wz required to be), where a lot of new plot material has to allow an established bunch of set-ups to turn into a new bunch of set-ups: w.character kept (and w.luck deepened) at the same time

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

the smile isn't directed at the doctor, is it? it's directed inwards, at ESCAPE FROM PECKHAM (ps did your rewatch establish that?)

i teared up at that moment, first time in, w.the music and the slo-mo: i am sort of taking it for granted she will not like him much for some time to come (hoping really)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't like the TARDIS interior (and neither does McCoy) - there appears to be a gap between initial ramp and control deck, bridged only by thin girders. sprained ankles before bedtime i tell thee.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

the rani's tardis had a kind of lobby!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

there should really be a revolving door, so it doesn't lose so much heat to ice planets, raw space etc

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

The door and seeing the Police Public Call Box from the inside was a little bit too reminiscent of cheap as you like TARDIS from Cushing filums. Good console except for the lcd screen which is a nice hint to the anachronistic BBC Model B that was in Davidson's TARDIS. Time Penis/Rotor should be pink tho.

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

does rose live in peckham?

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I disapprove of having the time cock connected to the ceiling.

Are there any other rooms in this TARDIS?

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

another bit i REALLY liked: when the doctor was going to die and the world end, so she rang her mum on her mobile!!

russell td did really excellent stuff w.mobiles in QaF: will she be able still to get a signal wherever they're going?

(i mean i can txt rainy in dunedin)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought it worked really well, the sped-up everyday-the-same stuff for Rose's intro in particular.

when the speeded up shite came on, I flashed back to reading YOU denouncing speeded up shite as a lazy trick of loser video directors in a piece about Madonna's 'Ray Of Light' video.

This inconsistency proves that you have been replaced by an Auton.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

auton sidebar: to aim a gun real actual humans use the fact that their trigger finger is (semi)pointing at the target; autons are pointing ALL their fingers at their own knees = why they generally miss?

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

also can i make my graham nauton live feed joke here as no one laughed (or noticed) when i made it during the actual broadcast

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

!! deny it if you can !!

http://www.cowestv.com/graham%20norton.jpg

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

actually instead of the policebox (zzzz) the tardis shd have manifested as a ROUTEMASTER!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 March 2005 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Are they all going to be 45 minutes (IE an hour for US rebroadcasting)?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 07:18 (twenty-one years ago)

the next two are, so i guess so.

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)

actually instead of the policebox (zzzz) the tardis shd have manifested as a ROUTEMASTER!!

Does anyone remember a 1960s/1970s story about a kid who travelled through space on a routemaster? He had a robot butler companion. I think it was in the Hotspur or some other DC Thomson 2nd division boy's comic. I promised to track it down for a friend who is writing a history of the Routemaster, but I have failed dismally.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, i could not be bothered to do my research so i thought i'd get the interweb to do it for me ;)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

> Henrick's was Jenners in Embra wasn't it?

no, was department store in cardiff (/swansea) which is why the premier was there.

> The London Eye gag was also grebt.

liked the way it looked like a halo around his head (ties in nicely with his last role as second coming). (that was sampled by Orbital on their last lp and the previous lp had dr who theme tune on it. coincidence or did they know something we didn't?)

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Am i right in thinking Ecclestone said the phrase "you lot" in the episode as well?

If Orbital did know something, then I bet they feel let down about not doing the theme tune (though their version would not have fit the thirty second intro so fair do's).

The incidental music was both rub and very Doctor Who.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I think he said it when he was describing how the current environment is perfect for the Nestene.

We have no indication that this is the ninth doctor. I'm just saying.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

JtN:
http://www.26pigs.com/hotspur/

"Another serial had a group of 20th Century athletes whisked back in time on a time travelling bus to ancient Greece where they competed against the original Olympians."

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

It's def not what stevie was thinking of but there was "Time BUSters" on BBC2, a lame "real adventure" thing from the ppl what did Knightmare

http://www.ukgameshows.com/index.php/Time_Busters

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

My review:

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2005_03_01_dys_archive.html#111212401603392858

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

what was the JFK assassination bit all about anyway?

-- DV (dirtyvica...), March 27th, 2005 2:33 PM. (dirtyvicar) (later)

To prove that the Doctor is a harbinger of DOOM (see also "he has a constant companion - DEATH"). The crew of Red Dwarf were there also, I'm surprised with all these timetravellers there was room in the town for dodgy men on grassy knolls and Lee Harvey Oswald.

-- ailsa (ailsa_watson7...), March 27th, 2005 2:39 PM. (ailsa) (later)


Also, a little in-jokey reference, no? Cos the first ever episode of Dr Who was transmitted the day after that, on Nov 23 1963.

JimD (JimD), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, in-jokey reference.

We have no indication that this is the ninth doctor. I'm just saying.

The BBC has said many times he's the ninth. It might not get mentioned in the show for a while though, focus on the present first.

Are they all going to be 45 minutes (IE an hour for US rebroadcasting)?

Yep, and I think that's why, to make overseas sales easier.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the stronger reference was having the debut story be another Auton invasion... that's how Pertwee arrived in March 1970!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

And yeah, he's the ninth. It's canon. Sorry REG!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 05:37 (twenty-one years ago)


New Doctor Who series confirmed
Christopher Eccleston as Doctor Who
The new Doctor Who had an average of 9.9 million viewers
The BBC has commissioned a second series of the new Doctor Who after the debut episode proved a ratings success on Saturday night.

The BBC has confirmed a second 13-part series as well as a Christmas special.

Writer Russell T Davies said: "It's fantastic news. It's been a tense and jittery time because the production team has been working on plans."

The production team said it was not known if Christopher Eccleston would return in the BBC Wales-made programme.

Flagship show

Eccleston and Billie Piper's first episode as the Doctor and Rose saw ratings as high as 10 million.

"We could all have ended up unemployed. But now we can put all those plans into action and get going," said Mr Davies.

"It's particularly good for BBC Wales. This is a major flagship show for the region, and their staff and crews are the best you could find. It's a tribute to them that Doctor Who is returning."

Mr Eccleston and Ms Pipers' contracts have options to appear in more series of the show.

BBC head of drama commissioning Jane Tranter told The Guardian she was happy to commission more episodes of the show after its debut success.

"In all honesty I had got myself into a proverbial steel jacket as far as Doctor Who was concerned. I told myself I'd be completely and utterly thrilled if it got 6.5 million, but there was a little voice inside whispering '4.5 million'," she said.

K9, Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

"a proverbial steel jacket" = what does she mean? what is the proverb?

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the rumours that David Tennant will be taking over from Eccleston (and yes, I know it's a bit soon to be talking about his replacement, but, hey, I didn't start it).

It means I can then have one degree of separation from Dr Who! (my husband went to school with him).

In jokes are wasted on me as I have never paid any proper attention to Dr Who before this weekend.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)

the private eye TV review section is always v.bad, a mix of snobby sneering and lame ignorance, but here is what they said about the new DW: "... what you want is a combination of familiarity and innovation. Doctor Who pretty much achieves this: the anoraks will enjoy new writer Russell T. Davies's post-modern nods to monsters of the past like the Hardons, who appeared briefly in the background of an episode with dear William Hartnell in the 60s, but there were good new twists involving the internet [etc]"

i am inclined to believe the reviewer wz given some bad information here

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/newspapers/31_march_2005/html/3.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/newspapers/31_march_2005/html/9.stm

The sun and the mirror both claim Ecclestone has quit.

K9, Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

BBC site is now running that same story. I'd say its credible.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

at end of series? or before next ep?

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:00 (twenty-one years ago)

where's that, Matt?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

The LATEST NEWS ticker at the top of the site.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Dammit, I knew my day was going far too well. One series? Booo.

carson dial (carson dial), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

shame

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Bollocks really, innit.

Still, interesting to see a Christmas episode confirmed, when the rumours about David Tennant I'd been hearing involved a Christmas regeneration...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

david tennant seems an unimaginative choice

this is bcz i want my friend P to play the next DW: she isn't a fan but i think she wd fkn ROCK!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

According to OG, the BBC have confirmed they've spoken to David Tennant about taking over, and that Billie has signed up for a second series.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

so we'll be on the 10th dr. already? what the hell? doesn' the only get 12 and the 12 was the Valyard? this doesn't leave much time left for him.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe he gets to be regen 11 for 3006 years

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The confirmation is up on the BBC site: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4395849.stm .

Next question: will he come back for the regeneration scene?

carson dial (carson dial), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

The Valeyard is between the 12th and 13th, technically.

However, and without getting too anal, it's all muddied by the events of the Five Doctors. The Master is, at one point, offered what appears to be a way out of the regeneration cycle - to say nothing of Borussa's desire for immortality - which implies it's not the limitation we might expect it to be.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)

leaving at Christmas as he fears being typecast.

dude didn't bother to think about this before signing on and getting everyone's hopes up???

He's not leaving until Christmas, so his final episode hasn't even been written and shot yet. I"m sure they'll write a regeneration episode.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, shame. This is always going to be the risk of casting a rising star actor - not that it's anything to be regretted, regenerating is what the character does, I wasn't expecting more than another season anyway.

I wonder if announcing series 2 this early forced his hand viz. the press announcement - it might have been better to wait until halfway through transmission and the whole thing would have seemed a bit less chaotic.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

seems a shame, to hear this news, before, even, the second episode is shown.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

would piper be the first sidekick to straddle two dr.s?

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

You know, you'd think that with today being the last day of my job before I get forced into redundancy and everything, I'd be pretty fed up tonight. But actually I got home feeling fine. And then read this, and now I'm properly upset! The one thing in the world that seemed to be going right, ruined! etc etc. Boo. :(

JimD (JimD), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

No, nowhere near RJG. The two companions that cover the first regeneration, for example.

To counter Tom's point above, I don't if it's the other way round and the Beeb's rather rushed confirmation of the second series is kneejerk 'good news' to counter the press running with Eccles quitting (which he would obviously have confirmed).

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Adric also found himself sandwiched between two doctors.

Aldo - good point.

David Tennant has a good face for it. He looks capable of space hijinks.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Tennant was the voice of something or other in ""Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka" .... the Richard Grant pilot. Does this pilot exist anywhere on the web?

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

this is absolutely absurd on Ecclescakes part - at least give it a couple of years before worrying about typecasting, not that that was going to be a problem what with his somewhat unusual manic yet nonchalant take on the role.


Idiot Question - was Richard E Grant being the eight Doctor in those online thingies?

Sven Basted (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)

i think Grant is non-cannon

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Look on the bright side - the rest of the series might be really shit and then you won't care about Ecclestone any more!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:48 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe he will turn out to NOT be the Doctor after all. I mean, what proof do we have? we didn't see him regenerate from a Dr. we know.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Hah! How awesome if McGann just wandered into the TARDIS and went 'OMG IMPOSTER IMPOSTER!!' and shot Eccleston in the head. Then we'd be back to eighth. Free kick.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously this is good because viewers will get to see what Doctor Who's REALLY about, i.e. regeneration. It's this show's secret weapon, the secret to its longevity. I just hope viewers don't lose confidence and stop watching.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:23 (twenty-one years ago)

will be interesting to see how they explain the briefness of the Eighth's Whospan - I expect they'll make references to countless adventures WE actually never saw, and there may be lots of novels released detailing the Eighth's adventures. Will seem very daft otherwise - don't want him to be thought of as the Jacques Santini of Spurs managers of Dr Whos (not very likely I know but a valid comparison at this juncture).

Sven Basted (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:23 (twenty-one years ago)

argh, by Eighth I mean Ninth sorry. but when did that regen actually take place? Will we know?

Sven Basted (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe he will turn out to NOT be the Doctor after all. I mean, what proof do we have? we didn't see him regenerate from a Dr. we know

That would be excellent. Maybe Kiefer Sutherland could quit '24' and become the next Doctor.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:27 (twenty-one years ago)

then it would be the RARDIS (Realtime And Relative Dimensions In Space), which would please Ned more than anyone else I'm thinking.

Sven Basted (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

when did that regen actually take place? Will we know?

I guess we will now :)

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The fannies are getting SOOO worked up about this.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 31 March 2005 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never heard of this other bloke - surely it's a misprint for Neil Tennant?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 31 March 2005 07:20 (twenty-one years ago)

The BBC must be laughing at the media coverage - Ant & Dec have Tony Blair (!) on Saturday Night Takeaway, but no-one seems to care when there's a Tenth Doctor to cast.

carson dial (carson dial), Thursday, 31 March 2005 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the next Dr should be one of the following:

- Dan Cruikshank;
- Anthony Head;
- Jose Mourinho;
- mark s.;
- Camille Paglia;
- Rowan Williams;
- Desmond Tutu;
- The Pinefox

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 31 March 2005 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Anthony Head would be a very good choice.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 31 March 2005 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

NO BUFFY INFECTION PLZ

If this had been a year ago everyone would have been "it's got to be David Walliams". They could undercut Ant&Dec more by casting Little Ant (and/or Dec). My vote would go for Olivia Colman

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 31 March 2005 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

If this had been a year ago everyone would have been "it's got to be David Walliams".

Only if they were smoking crack!

RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 31 March 2005 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i was meaning in the "Mr Ubiquitous" sense.

I know! the Dr Who internet guy from "Rose" - he's been in absolutely bloody everything. It can be like when Romana regenerated into Lady Astria.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I still think it should be Johnny Depp.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

at least no-one has suggested Alan Davies

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Jimmy Carr?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

CSI: Skaro

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

alien vs predator vs dalek

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Dr Quinn: Pan-Galactic Surgeon-Being

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Desperate Companions

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Timelords Wive$

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Alan Davies is always the Doctor in my heart.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude where's my TARDIS?

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

casting a rising star actor

I would have said Christopher Eccleston was a fairly bona fide British film and TV star by now, Tom. He's been rising for 10 years. I'm not surprised he's not staying. He's given the project a kick start, really high ratings, and some new credibility among people like, well, my mother (who watched Dr. Who for the first time in twenty years last week and will now continue to watch it).

If we can't have The Pinefox as The Doctor, I'd like to have Mark Williams, or maybe Gary Beadle (who used to play Paul Trueman on EastEnders). He would rule.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Thursday, 31 March 2005 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)

LITTLE MO!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)

CHANG!

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)

LOFTY!

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

It has to be DOT.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)

BILL MURRAY

Frogman Henry, Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

http://thebillbios.co.uk/burnside.jpg

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"Davros you slaaaaaaaaaaaag"

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.toonhound.com/henrypaint.jpg

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

companions:

http://www.toonhound.com/chrisrabbit.gif

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

henry's cat's motto is perfect for dr who: "He knows everything about nothing, and not too much about that..."

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

why did Henry's cat have a moustache but no mouth?

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a mouth not a mustache.

One thing guaranteed. It will not be Tennant. The BEeb can spin this story out for at least three months. How will Billie cope when they cast Chris Evans!

It will have to be a Scottish Doctor so Piper can tell people "Lots of planets have a Scotland."

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 31 March 2005 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

it ith a mouthtache

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 31 March 2005 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1450&item=6521003371&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

Would anyone like to own that?

Mikey T, Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad I'm not the only one who's thought of Gary Beadle. He'd bring a bit of 'Enders crowd with him too.

A / F#m / Bm / D (Lynskey), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

A friend suggested it should have regular guest Doctors, like Have I Got News For You. Immediately it became clear to me that Boris Johnson should be the next Doctor Who.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Stop. That. Right. Now.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG MIKEY

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha, Mikey and Dan, have either of you seen the original Queer as Folk?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

No, but I've heard about its Doctor Who shenanigans.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

One character upstages the boyfriend of his long-time chum by buying said chum a full-scale remote-control K9. This puts the boyfriend's gift of an actual CAR into the shade. ho ho DYS. I think in the US version they had someone turn up in Wonder Woman costume with issue 1 of wonder woman. rubbish.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 31 March 2005 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

well, not really!

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

actually you're right

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd give my right arm to own that K9 or one of those lifesize Daleks you can get. (or a Tardis).

Mikey T, Thursday, 31 March 2005 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh my lord why did I even spend one second of my life looking at a proper Dr Who fan forum?

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 31 March 2005 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

are their suggestions better or worse than ours?

Sven Basted (blueski), Thursday, 31 March 2005 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

They've failed to see the potential in Henry's Cat if that's what you mean.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 31 March 2005 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

speaking of tardises (?)

i have very vague recollections of going somewhere (blackpool?) and seeing this big doctor who exhibit but the only bit i really remember was that after walking around this huge space you exited via a door and when you looked around it was a tiny police box but they'd fit this whole exhibition in there... was clever.

ooh. the internet is great: http://www.drwhoexhibitions.co.uk/bpoolgallery.htm

1974... i am old.

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 31 March 2005 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.thisplanetearth.co.uk/index.html

OMG!!!! Buy your own dalek or Cyberman!

Mikey T, Thursday, 31 March 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeremy Beadle

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

David Tennant's looking likely. GOSH this is exciting

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

David Tennant would clearly be great... and hopefully have a bit of commitment to stay with it for a good few years. :)

Let's hope none of this business puts anyone off enjoying the following 12 episodes for what they are; the timing has not been for the best, certainly... but I can't see the general goodwill and interest fading so soon.

Tom May (Tom May), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

he's annoying, probably.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

There was a full-size dalek for sale in a trendy boutique in Clerkenwell a few years ago. I used to see it every time I'd walk into town, but knew it would never fit in my flat.

I found out later that someone's boss ended up buying it. Can't for the life of me remember whose, though.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)

PAUL MCGANN TO RETURN TO DOCTOR WHO ROLE

In a surprise announcement, a BBC Wales spokeswoman has confirmed that actor Paul McGann has agreed to take over the helm of the Time Lord’s TARDIS for the new second series of Doctor Who.
McGann is no stranger to sci-fi, having co-starred in Alien3 (1992) and also played the Doctor Who role in 1996, taking over from Sylvester McCoy in a television movie spectacular which proved a ratings success in the UK.

WALKED OUT

The role was vacated by Christopher Eccleston in a shock resignation on Wednesday (30 March), after only one episode of the new series had been broadcast.
McGann, 45, said he is “surprised and delighted” to return to the role.
Writer Russell T Davies added: “It is wonderful to have Paul back. Doctor Who has returned to massive acclaim, and who better to continue that legacy than the man who resurrected the show once before. We are no longer reliant on US dollars to fund the show - Doctor Who has come home to a welcome in the hillsides of BBC Wales.”
Rumours that actor David Tennant was approached were false, Tennant’s agent said. However Billie Piper will remain in the role of assistant Rose Tyler, for a 13 episode series starting in Autumn 2006.

RATINGS SUCCESS

McGann is the only actor to have been cast twice as the Time Lord. “Paul proved a huge success in the UK ratings,” added Davies; “he is so good looking, they make a great pair. Now Billie (Piper) will have a real sex-symbol to get her teeth into. This raises the bar for all of us”.
Jane Tranter, Head of Drama Commissioning, added: “I always wanted Paul to return to the role. Despite being a major film star, his finest work has always been for the BBC.” It is likely that the Christmas episode will see Eccleston leave, “de-generating” into Paul McGann’s familiar long-haired Doctor.

“TEN YEARS ON” - NEW DOCTOR WHO MOVIE FOR 2006:

Full details of McGann’s return, including the Dr Who movie deal Russell T Davies has offered to Christopher Eccleston, are here.

BBC Ceefax page 124, Friday

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Missing OG, huh? :)

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:44 (twenty-one years ago)

We have to do something to amuse ourselves. ;-)

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I understand that Paul McGann has agreed to do it only if he can wear a leather jacket like Christopher Eccleston. And if he can have his career back please.

They are also in talks about bringing K9 back but as a Golden Retriver using Babe style/My Hero style lip-synching technology.

Billie Piper cannnot actually play the bagpipes.

When the Cybermen return they will all come from the west country and be called the Cidermen.

etc etc

Pete (Pete), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh no! Paul McGann is supposed to be starring in my friend's movie in India. I hope he doesn't go running off to do Who instead.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

This one was posted at 2300GMT and at least one group were relatively convinced. The perils of having a server that isn't BST updated (hint, perhaps)

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 1 April 2005 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there some rule that says it always has to be a man, and he has to be white? Or is that just habit?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:34 (twenty-one years ago)

When Romana transmogrified, she tried on several different bodies - not all of them even humanesque. (Couldn't tell about the gender of some of them, though.) So I don't think race is an issue, but gender might be.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Sean Pertwee-wee.

Or how about actors with the same name as ex Doctor's but not related (a la Tom & Colin "My God He's Fat" Baker). So that would give us, er, Cheyrl Baker - er...

Pete (Pete), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)

my friend P is black and not a man - i totally think she wd rock as a future doctor and have basically been bullyin her to pitch for it

mark s (mark s), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

if species-body is not an issue, actor-gender isn't: eg enter the dworkinoblians, an alien race whose males have bodies which appear female to us humans and vice versa

mark s (mark s), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

regeneration is a crisitunity

mark s (mark s), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Even if there was some sort of sex change ban rule, the length & depth of "stuff what can happen in Doctor Who" would certainly allow it to happen. A villain who wants to single sex t'whole Universe including forcing TIme Lord regenerations etc etc. (Perhaps oit is also why The Doctor calls himself the Doctor, due to gender neutrality, unlike that wuss The Master.)

I think its unlikely, but ther eis absolutely no reason why it could not happen.

We should meet Susan again as a man first tho.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

regeneration should have the same rules as stars in your eyes

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)

If I was a fan-fiction lunatic (and wanted to completely disregard book continuity) I would make it that the Eccleston Doctor turns out to BE Romana.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)

NO CAT DEELEY IN THIS OR ANY OTHER TARDIS!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

If I was a fan-fiction lunatic (and wanted to completely disregard book continuity) I would make it that the Eccleston Doctor turns out to BE Romana.

Dan Perry to thread!

Leon Bluth (Ex Leon), Friday, 1 April 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

You don't have to disregard book continuity to make Eccleston into Romana! You just have to have it happen sometime after The Ancestor Cell.

The Doctor should regenerate into an ocelot.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 April 2005 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

review more who books now!

he shd regenerate into a TARDIS!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 1 April 2005 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

And rename himself Compassion! But I'm getting ahead of myself.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 April 2005 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Interesting…

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 2 April 2005 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

If only Cassandra's iPod jukebox had played Because We Want To instead of Toxic.
Okay, too too cute maybe, but still...

David Merryweather (DavidM), Saturday, 2 April 2005 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, I said exactly that same thing! The mister thought it was a stupid idea.

I didn't enjoy this week so much. Still some nice touches, but Eccleston is grating already and I'll be wanting to punch him by the end of the series.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 2 April 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked it when he got emo.

I thought it was good, the first five or so minutes were far too expository but then things rolled along nicely.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 2 April 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

good well maybe eccleston will be the annoying doctor and we'll be glad to be rid of him in a year

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 2 April 2005 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)

No, Ecclestone's really good in this. I didn't buy his big sulk after the argument with Rose though. His character swings from wilful and giddily enthused to prickly and sullen (when pressed about personal matters). I rather like that about him though, he isn't, like some previous Docs, letting his outfit play the role for him.
Big improvement on the first episode, and I love the steam-punk style TARDIS interior. More a clunking, whirring HG Wells time machine than some sterile design contraption from Look Around You

David Merryweather (DavidM), Saturday, 2 April 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Eccleston is grating already and I'll be wanting to punch him by the end of the series.

Well then good news!

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 2 April 2005 23:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked it... Eccleston not quite making the same impression as last week, but was good; I love the manic absurdity of his working of the TARDIS controls... there was a very good scene early-ish with Rose questioning this alien who she indeed doesn't really know... a shame perhaps the tension was dissipated with the slightly gimmicky mobile phone bit.

Overall; great stuff: genuine sense of scale; the budget showed and it was firmly Dr Who in its contrary way with morality. Great skewering of the plastic surgery culture.

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 2 April 2005 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked the way that it looked like old Doctor Who with its actors in funny costumes (the steward most obviously could have appeared in any Doctor Who episode since they turned colour) and turn turned up the actual modern special effects (but who can tell me what film the little spiders actually reminded me of?). Still a lot of corridors, though. How many plots have been advanced by the doctors companions getting pissed off and stomping away from him into a plot area?

The mobile phone scene was great! I thought it might introduce a clever piece of technology which if used realistically could offer nasty plot hazards, but then I remembered the name for that sort of object is the "sonic screwdriver".

It reminded me of Douglas Adams, which was alright. I expected it (from the preview) to remind me of some of the more ridiculous Sylvester McCoy episodes.

I like bits of the TARDIS are very old technology. It's possibly a design decision, to increase your chances, if the rubber band goes "sprang!", to be able to repair it in whatever time you end up in. Or possibly that's already happened a hundred times.

The TARDIS itself is, on current and preview evidence, more well-behaved than usual. Is this the first companion that can actually treat the whole thing as a series of adventures and back home for tea? My recollection is that for the others, either they had nothing to return to, or the TARDIS was being the TARDIS.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 3 April 2005 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Did the tree woman run the cafe in Hollyoaks way back when? She looked naggingly familiar...

M Carty (mj_c), Sunday, 3 April 2005 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Yasmin Bannerman

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

computer says no

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked the total extravagance of building several extra aliens that never even got to speak just because they had the money for it. I also liked the fact that these bonus aliens were a bit shit and old school looking.

I did not like a twist turning on the meaning of the word "meme", we get quite enough of that online thankyou.

I like the way they're keeping the old fans happy (or at least occupied) with this 'war' backstory to figure out.

And I liked the way the Doctor fancied the tree woman.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)

The giant rotating fans with the switch on the other side of them. I can't work out if that was incredibly shit, or a massive MASSIVE wink from the writer. They even took the piss out of that sort of thing on that Star Trek piss-take film with Alan Rickman (which I liked BTW)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, destroying Gallifrey, best move ever. Destroy all that tedious Gallifrey continuity that dragged the old series down (Did they even mention the planet's name?), and build in real "galactic loner" stuff, with bonus war back story and conflict and that

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(but who can tell me what film the little spiders actually reminded me of?).

The little spiders in Minority Report (+ small, annoying robot in The Phantom Menace)? They worked quite well, overall. Not sure how they managed to drag the nice plumber girl into the air-duct though, but they were nicely malevolent. And when one of them activated the lowering of the sunshield (by pressing a button on the corner of a computer) you'd have thought the steward would have given more of a reaction than to just sit there and say "No! Sunshield up!" and wait to be fried. Still, inventive death, I approve.
I also liked the Doc's psychic passport thing - another neato 'cheat' ala TARDIS affecting brain so everyone speaks [either RP or estuary] English.

and: Oompah-Loompahs!

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I am really worried that the Gallifrey gone thing *is* a big pile of tedious continuity that has been dragged in from the books. This would be k-lame on toast.

RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes rather enjoyable but i have got to say that I am not investing too much in Ecclestone cos he won't be around that long. Killing tree woman was sad, and I thought the ending was a little bit rub (I am a little bit worried about Davies making sure everything ties to the HUMANGS). But war back story is good except it implies no rogue timelord rivals (which actually isn't necessarily a bad thing considering teh Marster and teh Rani).

A little bit too much companion in peril, not enough "companion gonna sort it out".

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I am really worried that the Gallifrey gone thing *is* a big pile of tedious continuity that has been dragged in from the books.

According to the bloke who's written The Gallifrey Chronicles, it's nothing to do with the books at all. Which is nice.

I don't care how it's gone, as long as IT'S GONE!! I sodding HATE Gallifrey. "Our lord Borusa of the High Council of Time Lords with the Seal of Rassilon in the Time Chamber beneath the President of the Order of Mangafrax with a Time Lord Council of Big Plonkers Wank Wank Fucking Wank"

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:00 (twenty-one years ago)

They will totally bring the Master back next season, once they've worked out a way to make him actually menacing and sinister. I agree that no Gallifrey = good thing. WAS IT THE DALEKS cor gosh.

Yes the "strong companion" thing wasn't exactly visible.

RickyT: I am not up on my books continuity but I suspect the Real Fans will have spotted several story divergencies already.

xpost.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:02 (twenty-one years ago)

companion suffering trauma of destroyed planet, also she saved the planet only hours before. stroppy/sulky Dr also cos HE IS ALONE TOO. Now they are alone together, awwww!

yes daleks are the one's what done it i reckon. bloody sontarans were rubbish at invading g. reckon time-tech daleks did it. yay. or the terrible zodin

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Or the pig-swine.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:06 (twenty-one years ago)

The Peking Homonculus!

RickyT (RickyT), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:06 (twenty-one years ago)

A little bit too much companion in peril.

What's wrong with that? Far too naff to have Doctors ass saved by spunky tomboy every week. They can take it in turns. It's not as if Rose is feebly 'girly' if that's what you're terrified of - she gave Cassandra an earful after all (not that she had ears, but y'know).

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:16 (twenty-one years ago)

which leads into... Dr letting bad guy die. hmmm

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)

He gave her a chance. Oh no, he didn't (like last week). Murderous Doctor a go go. He Is The Law (Judge Dredd Doctor Who X-over).

Eccleston said "You Lot" twice this week. I think its an in-joke/ Orbital ad.

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Carson Dias mentioned Gallifrey being done for by the Doctor himself upthread.

I thought that the letting Zoe Wannamaker die aspect of the doctor was good stuff - suggested that he had a clear moral code but different to ours - galactic level right thing to do eg humans have become somehting different and better, time for last humang to go since demonstrated ethically bankrupt etc etc how could we know the Doctors complicated eon spanning perspective.

Was a war against HUMANGS that destroyed the TimeLords? They have touched every star in the sky you know.

Humpy Neighbour (Total Magnus), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

War with the trees....

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 3 April 2005 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, who played the plumber? Recognised her, but not normally blue?

Humpy Neighbour (Total Magnus), Sunday, 3 April 2005 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)

It reminded me of Douglas Adams, which was alright.

As soon as I picked up on the set-up I thought: Milliways.

My favourite bit: the *slightly* psychic paper.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 3 April 2005 09:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Also: POPTIMISM IN SPACE (for real!)

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Just for laughs, I ventured back onto Usenet to see what the Doctor Who newsgroup was saying. Apparently, this episode was all about RTD furthering his gay agenda. By playing "Tainted Love".

*shakes head*

I guess this was really Rose Part 2, showing her more of the Doctor's world, and making her question just why she went running off with a nutcase in a police box. Good stuff.

"Where am I going to go? Ipswich?" - last spoken by Kate Winslet in Dark Season, of course.

Is it wrong of me that I found the Tree woman extremely hot? Her "Your wife? Girlfriend? Concubine? Prostitute?" interrogation was funny and fun for all the family…

I'm torn on the Gallifrey front. While part of me would like the books and the series to tie-in and not contradict each other too much, I don't want the series to stop and explain The Ancestor Cell to viewers. Although I guess you could cut down a lot of the details: "Gallifrey's gone. I blew it up" would probably suffice.

I'm giddy about Dalek. I can't help the feeling that it's going to be a bit like Alien; an attempt to make them scare the viewers again. And next week, historical fun! woo!

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 3 April 2005 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

"Ooh, can you smell chips?"

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 3 April 2005 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)

this thread is getting a bit long... should we have one for each episode?

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 3 April 2005 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

when the Doctor mentioned Gallifrey being destroyed I was actually expecting him to tell Rose that it had been destroyed by the Daleks so she could say "The....what?" and look suitably confused.

The mobile phone scene and Zoe Wannamaker's Cassandra were definitely the best bits, insofar they marked the episode as being *of its time*. It really made me want to check out old episodes of Dr. Who on DVD in order to detect previous examples of that kind of thing.

MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 3 April 2005 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

The giant rotating fans with the switch on the other side of them.

= bad old rubbish. Talkative lower-class type with negative life span = good old rubbish.

"This... was known as an iPod"

which was about ten feet from "the ancients say this was the great city of wah-sing-ton" antics ie completely classic.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 3 April 2005 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Judging by rec.arts.drwho etc the Real Fans seem very negative! (even aside from it being a gayist conspiracy)

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

The giant rotating fans just made me think of Tomb Raider.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I was thinking The Mary Whitehouse Experience (or was it Newman & Baddiel In Pieces) - one of them anyway.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

The only thing that annoyed me a bit was when the girl who needs permission to speak, speaks first to tell Rose that. It could have been set up better, I think.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

having just googlegrouped r.a.dw OH FOR FUXAKE. It is a rule of the internet universally acknowledged that the noisiest twunts are the menkest. (er sorry everyone at the top of the statscock) It's funny watching nutters going "oh that was shit" and then the old guard who-industrialist (like Lance and Matt) saying "well i quite liked it"

Top of the "i give up" list has to go this post http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.arts.drwho/msg/9c005f2e4adfc34d
"I've decided it's not drwho so I'm not letting it get to me. The novelty
will wear off and the only viewers left will be the jaded, undiscerning,
autistic nerd fan boys. Russels little project in gay activism will be added
to the pile along with all the other stupid trash that has happened since
1980. I'm certain that if I were gay I'd find this attempt at gay sci/fi to
be ill concieved. Bad is bad. I just wish all this really phenomenal
lameness hadn't happened to a show that once got me in front of the tv"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 16:32 (twenty-one years ago)

That tardis is a damn toilet. It actually looks like a gaudy lounge area in a sort of run down gambling casino from the 1970's that might be featured in a movie about thugs directed by Martin Scorcese but which hasn't been used an has had mostly every thing stripped out except for some hunk of junk in the middle and some plumbing. It has the look of an area where you might find shallow middle aged women with incredibly big hair sitting around in their horn rimmed glasses and talking about nothing (I can just see them sitting on that couch thingy next to the console).

Eccles just looks like a dork. Dork is the only word for it. He looks like a dork. His jacket is dorky looking. He looks like a dork in the role. It's as though the editor for reality itself has suddenly come down with schizophrenia. It just doesn't make sense. It doesn't flow aesthetically. Something is wrong in the universe. It's as though the archetype for "that which is self aware" has been created now, long after the concept of a peice of art being self aware was first known. I can't really think of anything that is more self conscious than this newWho. The whole thing and all the little bits that make it up; the theme, the art design, the actors, the writing, all are splayed out wide eyed, necks craning forward straining to be a commercial for the thing itself - and especially after everything that has happened - a show that stood apart from ordinary television, partly on purpose, but mostly an accident of history, and then suddenly became a
prostitute with way too much make up that is smeared, to being a stark unbelievable parody of itself. And then the TVM - and now this! Drwho has definitely taken a fascinating place in tv history; it will definitly be something for scholars to talk about. I wonder if they'll blame it on the phenomenon of hard core fans, autistic nerds, socially stunted with no aesthetic sense or discernment but a rabid appetite for "gooniness"...

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)

SLAP. one of the funnier crits was that the new tardis interior looks a bit like the teletubbies den

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Dear Russel T Davies, whatever it is you are doing that annoys Dr Who freaks so much, please, please, please continue.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=2005-02
Saturdays episode was 7.27 (36.05%)

Ratings lost 3 million. How much was that due to Ecclestone quitting and the surrounding bad publicity?

I'm sure it meant many people didn't think it was worth watching because they didnt see the point as the actor had quit.

K9, Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

How much was it due to three million people remembering why they didnae like Doctor Who in the first place.

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Big drop for Ant and Dec too, though - it was a sunny evening, less people watching TV in general. If it evens out at 7 I think the BBC will be happy enough.

xpost and Pete is right, the first show was always going to get a much higher rating, just because of all the advertisements.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

was that "Fast Show" Simon Day as the main blue fella?? the "permission to speak" woman was apparently "an actress" who's been in farces and that. i swear i keep seeing the same people in different tv shows. what's that all about?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe the phrase to use is they are all "off the telly"

Pete (Pete), Sunday, 3 April 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, blue fellow was Simon Day. And tree woman was her off Hollyoaks who grew up to shag the posh one off Cold Feet. Has anyone found out who the plumber woman was, I'm sure I recognised her too but imdb.com is a bit short of info for guest appearances for this week's episode for some reason.

(however, it does indicate an upcoming episode featuring Tamsin Greig and Simon Pegg, together with Gay Todd from Coronation Street)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 3 April 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

You see? The real fans are right! Davies is trying to turn it into Dr. Whoops (Matron)!

Should I be worried yet by the lack of cliffhangers? It's so long since I watched Dr. Who, I can't remember if every single story was at least two parts. If they're going to wrap everything up in 45 minutes, we'll never have anything to look forward to.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 3 April 2005 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

There will be three two-parters, each will have a cliff hanger.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 3 April 2005 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

So can anyone comfirm whether or not they're bring McGann back?

stephen morris (stephen morris), Sunday, 3 April 2005 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

They're not bringing McGann back. They don't want him, he doesn't want them. Plus it'd be bloody stupid.

Dear Russel T Davies, whatever it is you are doing that annoys Dr Who freaks so much, please, please, please continue.

Innit great? I love it when the fannies run around with their pants on fire.

Ratings lost 3 million. How much was that due to Ecclestone quitting and the surrounding bad publicity?

Nah. Last week's was always going to be high because loads of people tuned in out of curiosity. 7.2 million is still an amazing figure [around 80% audience retention], and far better than the 4 million Julie Gardner was hoping for. If it stays around 7 million it'll be on telly for a very long time.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm a doctor who freak and i think the new show is great!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 4 April 2005 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

DV was telling me that there was one other one-part story before this, which also the only one that did not feature Doctor Who.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 April 2005 06:53 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, mission to the unknown from the sixties. it was a setup for the twelve(!) part daleks' masterplan.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 4 April 2005 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I generally enjoyed it, but thought that it was a bit "Restaurant At The End Of The Universe". There was a time when Dr. Who invented memes instead of recycling them. (insert joke about the Meme bad guys, which was actually clever.)

I really didn't like The Last Human bit. Women with too much plastic surgery is too obvious a schtick (see also Brazil) and irked me as a cheap sexist joke.

I'm still waiting for the series to settle into itself, it's still too much "explanation and catchup for people new to it all". Perhaps next week's Victorian episode will go more Talons of Weng Chi-ang.

I'm still going to keep watching it. I've watched Dr. Who my entire life with a forgivenes of its fault and not going to stop that now.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)

But Cassandra was male! "Where I grew up as a boy"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 April 2005 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)

> but thought that it was a bit "Restaurant At The End Of The Universe".

see, i thought that too but thought it was a nice nod to DNA.

fave bits: Rose refering to Cassandra variously as 'Michael Jackson' and 'A Bitchy Trampoline'.

the big fans were very Banjo Kazooie.

Guardian seemed to suggest that 'Moxx of Balhoun' was some kind of pun but i can't figure it out. i R stupid.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post...

Oh, a bitchy drag queen. Even better.

I'm not sold on the Steampunk TARDIS. I loved the way it looked so pristine and SPACE in the original series. But then again, if Dr. has been running around in it for thousands of years, it might get a bit... dirty. (Same reason I've always preferred Babylon 5 to Star Trek - the spaceships are *dirty* like real craft would be.)

I was a bit disappointed by locking Rose in a box for half the episode. Sure, it meant the Dr. got to run around with the Forest of Cheam woman but it was a bit "damsel in distress". Are they going to try and make a jealousy issue to bring Dr. and companion closer together?

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i still get the impression RTD is getting lots of "stuff" out of the way at tremendous speed ("alien convention" check; "regrettable death of likeable alien" check; "companion trapped alone" check)

(being a pervert formalist i enjoy the "handling" of this of course)

i promised you mobile action and it wz delivered!!

and haha yay TOXIC!! does RTD read FT or WHAT??!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

(also didn't ALIEN herself stalk by undeclared at one point during the party!?)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Are they going to try and make a jealousy issue to bring Dr. and companion closer together?

No, haven't you heard, the Doctor is no longer a Time Lord - he's now a Gay Lord thanks to Russel T Davies and his meddling pervert ways! Why oh why must he thrust his salty gayness down my guzzling throat?

I hope the Xmas special will feature Kylie as Queen of the Galaxy. The Dr must defeat her so that he can become Queen of the Galaxy!! With feather boas, glitter, an army of leather joy-boys and a disco soundtrack, yes!
I mean, I hope that doesn't happen, obviously.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't get the "Moxx" thing either, Deano. Is it some Douglas Adams ref (haha like the whole episode wasn't that eh)!

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Monday, 4 April 2005 08:55 (twenty-one years ago)

it wz like d.adams IF HE WAS ACTUALLY EVER GOOD or FUNNY!! [/controversial]

good moment of incompatible tech-morality ["updates are good hence whatever my machine does must be good"] = billie cross that the tardis translates in her head w/o knowing

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:06 (twenty-one years ago)

who did cassandra's voice?

(also still unanswered: DID BILLIE LIVE IN PECKHAM?)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh! Don't even go there. It was like Adams with the funny bits taken out!

I thought the "updates are good" thing was quite funny, though, poor beleagured helpdesk types. The "I can't speak unless you give me permission" was just unnecessary OOOH! RAH!!! WORKING CLASS COMPANION!!!! OOOOOH!!! which only backfired.

x-post

Billie was on a 12. Of course Billie lived in Peckham.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)

On rec.arts.stop.this.gay.menace there was a brilliant menko theory that the Doctor is EVILLY HYPNOTISING Billie every time they hold hands!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Are hypnotism skills something you aquire when you catch the GAY, if so i want in.

Ed (dali), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Are hypnotism skills something you aquire when you catch the GAY?
If so i want in.

Ed (dali), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

potentially great plotwise i think eccleston is
i. NOT the doctor but someone else evil
ii. the doctor but going through a homeworld-destruction-induced psychotic episode

(not least bcz this gives much continuity-related scope for fucking with all the "is he 8th or 9th regen" tedium)

i. requires that bbc always knew he wz leavin after one series (which i also think is possible)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Cassandra = Zoe Wanamaker, which drove me crazy until someone told me afterwards.

plot = the metaplot as regards the doctor's attitude to his back story: "Yeah, some stuff happened. Fuck it. Do you want to see something cool?"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I was somewhat disappointed by not getting to see London 7000 years in the future, either looking like one of those New Zealand School paintings of The Bank of England with trees growing through it, or some cyber-community with spaceage floating routemasters.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:34 (twenty-one years ago)

> spaceage floating routemasters.

i foresee problems with wheelchair access...

koogs (koogs), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude! Floating wheelchairs! In fact, technosurgery will have proceeded to the advanced state where there will be no more handicapped persons! They will clone themselves and grow new legs!

(OK, obviously human trampolines will require attendents, but she had a TELEPORTATION device.)

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

the animation of cassandra's face was very funny (esp.her very first faux-shy smile when she entered the party-room) (i assume it wz based on zw's own dimply features in action)

haha is ken still mayor of london in the year 5 billion! (i spect yes)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I also have a feeling that the Beeb knew quite early the Ecclestone was going to leg it. It also allows the christmas episode to be a good transition. It makes a lot more sens eofr a Doctor to regenerate halfway through an dangerous adventure than at the end if you think about it. And the immense possibilities of Rose leaving his for dead as she tries to save herself, and then some other bloke calling himself the Doctor rocking up and trying to convince her its him.

(I still think he should be Scottish.)

Pete (Pete), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the gifts scene was classic: the Doctor is a brilliant improviser, but too lazy not to try the same thing twice.

Also brilliant: his rage after returning to the observation deck (I may have mentally inserted some swearing, unless he actually said "I'm fucking full of ideas").

xpost - RJG for next Doctor!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Ken will have fossilised and turned into Ken Livingstone for real.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the Face of Bo looked a bit familiar..

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 April 2005 10:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought it was the Face of Bow, as in East London.

(Similarly wasn't the Forest of Cheam also a medieval hunting forest in Essex?)

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry - Surrey. I should know that. Bah.

Masonic Cathedral (kate), Monday, 4 April 2005 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I would be a good dr. who.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 4 April 2005 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Scotctor Who (that doesn't quite work does it).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 4 April 2005 10:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Today's "awww" moment: on Blue Peter, two kids are showing off their Dalek compost bin to Konnie Huq. They're talking about how they made it, when all of a sudden, Eccleston runs into the Blue Peter garden, vaporises the Dalek with his Blue Peter badge, and runs off, leaving the two boys struck dumb with awe. Heh.

carson dial (carson dial), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

(I still think he should be Scottish.)

David Tennant is Scottish. Pete will have his wish, and I can still have one degree of separation from Doctor Who. Everyone (except you lot who don't want Tennant) will be a winner. Especially Tennant, who used to go to school in a Peter Davison-esque cricket sweater, and had a Tom Baker-esque scarf and was generally a bit of a Doctor Who freak at school.

Is Eccleston going to be around/come back to film his regeneration into someone else?

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

who used to go to school in a Peter Davison-esque cricket sweater, and had a Tom Baker-esque scarf and was generally a bit of a Doctor Who freak at school

three very good reasons it shd go to SOMEONE ELSE surely!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think they've even filmed the whole series yet, so 'm sure this will just be worked into the last episodes shot. he didn't walk off in the middle of the series. (xpost)

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

The whole series has been filmed already though, hasn't it?

I don't really care if David Tennant gets it, but he is very watchable and surely "gets" Doctor Who, if that is in any way important. And, most importantly, I can relate second-hand tales of his schooldays.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Is Eccleston going to be around/come back to film his regeneration into someone else?

Yeah, christmas special.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Can't you relate those *anyway*?

(xpost)

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 4 April 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, yes, but I need to find them out first. All I know so far is the Doctor Who related stuff. There was an interview with his mum in my local paper on Friday.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, just saw episode two and:

1) Rose is fucking awesome.
2) Zoe Wannamaker is fucking awesome.
3) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE "iPod"!!!!!!!
4) Best Doctor ever? Possibly.
5) There is a reason I no longer post to rec.arts.drwho. I think some of you are discovering it for yourselves.
6) I will try to post some book reviews this weekend. Honest.
7) I FUCKING LOVE THIS SHOW!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

yay

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Simon Day wasn't The Fast Show Simon Day, was he? He didn't look or sound anything like The Fast Show bloke. We compared and everything.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh and I thought it was just okay this week, but 'er indoors loved it. Next week's looks well awesome. Two words: MARK FUCKING GATISS

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

(Addendum to 5: Many of the sane people went to rec.arts.drwho.moderated, so the postings there might make more sense.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

that's what i thought. face shape all different and that. but surely with those "equity" rules?? eh

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

x post, that was re: simon day

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

dan, I sent you an email!

Remy (x Jeremy), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

what is wrong with that EmmEmm guy on r.a.dw?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

But his facial structure's different! And the voice! The range sounds nothing like what he could even manage...

[xpost]

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh you said that too didn't you? Sorry

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4410943.stm

they had agreed he'd go in january!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

this is weird. why would the BBC make this apparently wrong announcement? if the plan was for him to leave all along because they wanted to show a regeneration or he was supposed to have been an imposter, wouldn't the BBC be the people that would know?

this sounds like corrective PR to me but maybe not.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 4 April 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

people keep saying "imposter". does anyone actually think this is at all likely?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 4 April 2005 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

considering the vituperative reaction on the part of some of the fans (eg Outpost Gallifrey) it would have been wise to control the release of the news until the show had bedded in and ppl had calmed down some.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 4 April 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Can one of the Aussie crew hook me up with the first two episodes?

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Can you do divx/xvid?

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Soitanly.

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

In that case, yes.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I generally enjoyed it, but thought that it was a bit "Restaurant At The End Of The Universe". There was a time when Dr. Who invented memes instead of recycling them.

hahaha, there was also a time when Douglas Adams invented memes instead of recycling them from old Doctor Who scripts! Hello there Dirk Gently!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Great! Actually, I can d/l these on bittorrent, but we have a long list of shows...

Where'd you find them?

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Bittorrent :)

Actually a mate did it for me, I don't have broadband. How/when do you want 'em?

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Bear in mind that we are talking about distributing PUBLIC DOMAIN FANFICTION that ALLEGEDLY bears some resemblance to this new-fangled whatsit.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)

In fact perhaps we could *trade* PUBLIC DOMAIN FANFICTION, if you have any PUBLIC DOMAIN FANFICTION that might be of interest to me?

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a series of fan-made short films pertaining to the adventures of a spaceship dubbed the 'Galactica'. I also have quite a few teleplays of 'Carnies VS Evil Priests in Depression-era America' and 'The Cowboy Show with lots of swearing'.

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

ew.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Although the carny fanfic could be worthwhile.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:03 (twenty-one years ago)

"does anyone actually think this is at all likely?"

"at all" as in "more likely than the fact that a humanoid alien with two hearts would have a time machine disguised to look like a police-only telephone box from 1962" or "at all" as in "less likely than the fact that a humanoid alien with two hearts would have a time machine disguised to look like a police-only telephone box from 1962"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I noticed that Richard Ingrams' column in last Sunday's Observer also hinted subtlely at the whole "RTD has an Evil Gay Agenda!" thing:

"Doctor Who succeeded in the past partly thanks to the flamboyance of actors who played the part, notably Mr Tom Baker. The latest incarnation, however, turns him into a rather nondescript character with crew-cut, northern accent and shiny leather jacket. No offence to actor Christopher Eccleston, but he looks too much like those men you see sitting outside cafes in Old Compton Street, Soho."

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:50 (twenty-one years ago)

> (I still think he should be Scottish.)

like sylvester mckoy?

blue faced woman was beccy armory and i think the answer to 'where have i seen her before' is probably 'Harry and Cosh'

her imdb entry in full:

1 "Family" (2003/II) (mini) TV Series .... Martine
2 Ashes and Sand (2002) .... Jo
3 "Harry and Cosh" (1999) TV Series .... Lara

i'm told it starts tonight on CBC for Canadians / lucky North Americans

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Ahh, where is the Harry and Cosh thread. I miss it.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually assumed Forest Of Cheam was a Hancock in-joke.

On the episode itself, I thought it was... OK. Far too much of a nod to Restaurant At The End Of The Universe, and the 45 minute length struggles again with plot development. Where was the detecting element? Plus the big reset switch was just plain silly. What was the Face Of Boe for, other than a (presumably very) expensive prop? Plus RTD shouting I PWN POP CULTURE, LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!111!!ONE!! is only entertaining for a while (and I possibly blew out my RTD valve for the moment with Casanova). Bring on the other writers.

On the plus side, I'm hugely enjoying the fanwank surrounding this potential Time War.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"at all" as in "more likely than the fact that a humanoid alien with two hearts would have a time machine disguised to look like a police-only telephone box from 1962" or "at all" as in "less likely than the fact that a humanoid alien with two hearts would have a time machine disguised to look like a police-only telephone box from 1962"

unfortunately, I meant does anyone think it is at all likely that the BBC will say, at the end of this new dr. who series, "yes, it wasn't dr. who"? I feel like I'm being silly.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:11 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not totally unprecedented.

Four words: Bobby In The Shower.

WE ARE THE KATE!!! (kate), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)

the final scene of this series = billie seeing a naked colin baker in the tardis shower!!

*and a billion whofanvoices cried out, and were suddenly silent*

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

There are a few good counter-examples but most of the plotting in TV Who has always been a bit rubbish and generally involves the insertion of sub-plots which go nowhere and fill up space. This did have the happy side-effect of occasionally creating a level of tension, which is the real casualty of the more frenetic 45-min approach.

The new series doesn't feel very like any previous Doctor Who, in fact the 2nd episode reminded me more of 2000AD than Doctor Who. This isn't an awful thing. One of the things fans keep saying about DW is that it's an incredibly flexible show that can encompass a huge range of styles and moods. This is true, especially if you don't add the implied caveat "but this range was set in stone by '89".

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus the big reset switch was just plain silly.

From the direction at that point, I get the distinct impression it was meant to be. Although him gliding through that last fan was just stupid.

What was the Face Of Boe for, other than a (presumably very) expensive prop?

Probably a recurring character/species. Hope so. The face looks like someone I know and gives me the willies.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

http://entertainment.news.com.au/story/0,10221,12770529-10229,00.html

The ABC bought it. Will go out in mid-May.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Has Dr Who ever mentioned football in an episode?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Dunno. Cricket got a fair mention.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:37 (twenty-one years ago)

the second episode is great. sure the fan was kind of dumb but one dumb bit per story is a pretty good ratio compared to the past for this show. it really does feel like a completely different series; I like the return to London and the phone call home, it grounds it and makes Rose more real and symathetic than any previous companions. too bad it's not on in the US, I think it would do well. It's immensely more watchable than a ton of other shows on the sci-fi channel.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

is anyone finding rose's cockney/estuary accent a bit unconvincing? it seems to wax and wane throughout the episodes.

debden, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm hoping Davies deliberately contradicts so much of the old series than anorak fannies have no choice but to fuck off. Here are my suggestions:

8: The new Doctor who will be played by Billie Piper, after Rose receives a life-saving blood transfusion from the ninth Doctor.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)

billie has validated my droppin of the science of the droppin of the g

(also: accents wax and wane in REAL LIFE tho IRL is admittedly a poor grounding for tardislife)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

If Billie got drunk, what *would* her accent do?

We Are All Full Of Kate (kate), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the return to London and the phone call home, it grounds it and makes Rose more real and symathetic than any previous companions.

ABSOLUTELY. One good thing about having NA writers driving the new series is that the companions now have a shot at being fleshed-out fully-realized characters rather than broad sketches (plus the new format really tightens the storytelling and removes the need to add Yet Another Scene Where Someone Drives Through A Quarry to pad out the episode).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

If Billie got drunk, what *would* her accent do?

OooooARRRRRR she be from Swindon innit. Piratical then.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I am slightly afeared by trailers for this week's DW. The costume/makeup people have done a job: Billie should never wear her hair up, as it makes her look even more chipmunkish (and less cute) and draws attention to her weird circumflex-eyebrows.

ôô
Ö

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Rose rocks.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I enjoyed the first episode, which was on the CBC last night. I've never watched much Doctor Who before though so I can't really say how it compares.

Leon WK (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

It doesn't, fortunately.

This series really is a whole new beast. Once you start deconstructing the themes in The End of the World, you really begin to see just how incredibly high quality this piece of work is.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 7 April 2005 00:31 (twenty-one years ago)

deconstructing the themes

I've always been curious: What does this phrase mean?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 7 April 2005 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Means pulling apart the show and looking at how it's put together, in the context of literature. For example there's a very strong theme involving Rose's name and presence, and her interaction with Cassandra and the tree people. There's loads of stuff like that in this episode.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 7 April 2005 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)

there are still people who grumble about this being a misuse of the word "deconstruct" though - when it's being used as a near synonym for "analyse". but i think that battle is lost.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Thursday, 7 April 2005 07:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Well it is deconstruction, but in the context of dismantling a text rather than as a philosophical movement, so ner.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes but as a literary term, and as an act, it is a conpletely different beast. Analyse is a particularly good substitue what with it containing the word Anal.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i. let all the "voices" woven into a whole now be heard as a community in discussion/debate/quarrel
ii. what do we have to lose/omit/overlook in order to consider "dr who" as a stand-alone um "thing" (text *spits*)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes but as a literary term, and as an act, it is a conpletely different beast. Analyse is a particularly good substitue what with it containing the word Anal.

Only if you don't regard the philosophical meaning of 'deconstruction' as a pretentious load of shite.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 7 April 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I've just read a theory that this episode is a dig at the old show, what with its Adherents of the Repeated Meme and its deadly fans.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 7 April 2005 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw Casanova before Dr Who whilst in the knowledge that Tennant would most likely be replacing Ecclestone and as much as I enjoyed it (Dr Who) I was thinking I want Cassanova Neil Hannon man in a scarf already. There were parts of Cassanova which could have been from Dr Who, sort of, each had scenes were the main character intergrated himself at a party to which he had not been invited, similar tone and purpose. But would Tennant edge the series closer to a world of japes and romps?

elwisty (elwisty), Friday, 8 April 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)

Guardian seemed to suggest that 'Moxx of Balhoun' was some kind of pun

this is still bugging me

Slumpman (Slump Man), Friday, 8 April 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)

I think it's some kind of in-joke with Davies. He was mentioning something called a 'Moxx of Balhoon' right from the start, before they'd even shot anything.

Alex in CHEEM (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 8 April 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

I don't think it's so much David Tennant that would lead it to a series of japes and romps, more that that's the way Russell T Davies is leading it anyway, and David Tennant seems to have shown in Casanova that he can do Davies' romps very well.

ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 8 April 2005 07:27 (twenty years ago)

Leaked box set details:

http://images.gallifreyone.com/newsgraphics/newseriesdvdbox.jpg

http://images.gallifreyone.com/newsgraphics/newseriesdvdboxinside.jpg

I don't like it.

Plus it's got a £70 RRP.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 8 April 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)

£70??? I thought The Wire S1 box set was quite expensive, and that's only £50 for thirteen episodes!

*heads off to BitTorrent*

carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 8 April 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)

If they make the box like the TARDIS, people should expect to find at least 5002 DVDs in there. Hope they've got plenty of extras.

lock robster (robster), Friday, 8 April 2005 08:55 (twenty years ago)

Play have a pre-order price of £55. I'll have to wait and see where I can get a better deal elsewhere ( dvd.co.uk I expect).

The vanilla discs are only a tenner each on Play (£15 RRP), RTD has said there'll be plenty of extras on this (looks like a minimum of two discs worth) but it'll need to be something special to justify the price tag.

Who am I kidding, I'll still buy it.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 8 April 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)

Cryin' out loud, look at the size of that mutha! Looks like each panel is the width of a reg DVD case, and, apart from the central flap, the middle is sodding empty! Is this the only series collection there is/going to be or will there will be a traditional fold-out case? I don't like these gimmicky boxes, plus they're too big.

people should expect to find at least 5002 DVDs in there.

2005 DVDs more like.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Friday, 8 April 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

watched the End of the World with my wife last night who has never had any interest in anything who related (she is not a sad dork like me) and I think she was pleasantly surprised to find herself liking it.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 8 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

are japes and romps inappropriate in space?

(i think this is an x post)

elwisty (elwisty), Friday, 8 April 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

That box is stupidly big. I don't have space in my flat for that box.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 9 April 2005 04:24 (twenty years ago)

Don't worry, the box is bigger on the inside than it is on the outside.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Saturday, 9 April 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

I saw it for the first time tonight.

Very good, great. Too short. That would have made a great two or three parter. Great ideas great monsters, not enough time to develop them.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

yeah this pellmell rush!! but there are ten years of no dr who to get into the mix, i guess

is it one adventure per ep throught the series?

poor gwyneth :(

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

haha "from brecon?"

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

Tonight's episode was excellent. Genuinely scarey (I hope all kids under 50 were hiding behind the sofa, cos I certainly thought about it!), but keeping the humour up.

Written by Mark Gattiss, which may have something to do with the quality.

Guilty Boksen (Bro_Danielson), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

"we're going to have a seance, wa-hey!"

I enjoyed it, though.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

No, there are a couple of two-parters coming in this series.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

Old school Dr who pacing would have had us at a cliff hanger in the theatre scene, but that would have been far two slow but they could have expanded, I'm not entirely sure where though as it was written in such a compact fashion. You couldn't have had bad gelf going around cardiff as then a simple get them in one place and blow them up would have been more difficult. hmm tv writing is more difficult than it looks.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

haha

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

as tom notes up-thread, old-skool dr who was often VERY old-skool cliffghanger writing = thre-parts ep padding to one exciting ending, then a with-one-bound-he-wz-free dodgy solution next week, which if you watch em back-to-back is sometimes (noyt always) a massive big CHEAT!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

since sluggishness is one of my pet peeves in current TV writing (footballer$ wive$ picked up a BIT this week but jeez), i'm quite pleased at the demented pace this series is setting

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)

Also the dr as a pragmatic lying bastard is a good angle to work, I hope that this gets him into trouble later.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

"this is not your morality - get used to it or go home!"

this is yr morality rift right here! excellent....

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

I did think the theatre scene was a bit Raiders Of The Lost Ark in the style of the alien gas thing's flying around the place.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

i thought the 'scariest' bit was the servant describing Billie's future Earth ("metal birds with people in them!"), not actually scary (like nothing else in the new series really*) but suitably compelling. i like these little subtly chlling tangents (The Doctor's blurb about feeling the Earth move in the first episode counts too). the gayseous ghosts were a bit Raiders Of Lost Ark innit.

better than I expected but I'm still not really feeling it as much as most of you. Part of it may be that I'd prefer it if it had been filmed on video instead of film so it looked more like Eastenders does...but because this would make it look more like 'real life' it would probably make the monsters etc. look 'worse'. it's just a bit TOO glossy for me tho. TARDIS still rub but i like the 'whale noises' - how contrary!

i didn't get to see last week's which affects my judgement what with that being the only 'future' one so far. i'm a bit troubled by the Gallifrey thing but it all gives me a headache what with not having a clue about the books and whatnot.

$V£N! (blueski), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)

"I'm going to die in a dungeon. In Cardiff." I liked that.

I'm still struggling to see Dr Who as Dr Who, I just see him as Christopher Eccleston. I was just talking to the mister about how they remade Randall & Hopkirk Deceased starring Vic'n'Bob for a generation of Saturday evening telly-viewers who had never seen the original. This series kind of reminds me of that.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

"I love a happy medium!"

GROAN, then laugh, or the other way round...

$V£N! (blueski), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

"I'm going to die in a dungeon. In Cardiff."

I liked that line, but my main thought through that scene was "don't they both have such vivdly-defined neck muscles!"

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

And the other thought - "my, those zombies are taking their time!" This new series doesn't seem to be great on peril, although as mentioned above, the forced cliff-hangers of old (and the week inbetween) were probably more responsible for that than particularly fantastic writing. Good to see the TARDIS screwing up again!

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

There was another couple of hints of dark secrets - the time war, I think, and the bit where Dickens (bloody Simon Callow) asks who he is, and he looks very bothered before putting the cheery face back on.

Since next week's appears to be contemporary UK, I am starting to feel very strongly that we are overdue an alien planet story.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

Apparently a law has been passed that if you want to put on a dramatic performance featuring a character "inspired by, based upon or directly portraying" Charles Dickens, you have to give Simon Callow first refusal.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

he has his own costume and stick on beard

Ed (dali), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

SAFEST PLACE FOR HIM!!

as long as he is playin c.dickens he CAN'T BE PLAYIN ANYONE ELSE!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

Isabel felt this was the weakest ep so far - I probably agree but still enjoyed it a great deal (i.e. 8/10 not 9/10), I think Dr Who and the BBC in general find it quite easy to slip into Victoriana by numbers, egad sir what are these jack o lanterns etc etc. All good clean fun of course.

The Doctor really fucks up - this is a good thing for the series.

I am not sure the time war needs to be mentioned every episode but it's all very intriguing.

I haven't actually re-watched any of the episodes yet but I get the feeling it's quite re-watchable.

Next week's looks GREBT - I will be in Seattle and will avoid this thread :(

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 9 April 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

Callow was very good as something else once - in Chance In A Million. He's just annoying in his serious theatrical acting mode. He seems so fucking pleased with himself all the time.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 9 April 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

my main thought through that scene was "don't they both have such vivdly-defined neck muscles!"

Mine was "Rose's teeth!"

Onimo (GerryNemo), Saturday, 9 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

This has put me over the edge, I'm going to slavishly follow this series from now on. If any aussie ilxors could help me catch up, that would be cool.

DOCTOR WHO IN 1870 WITH SEANCES AND GHOSTS, HELL YES, WOOHOO!

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Saturday, 9 April 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)

bbc four reshowed some Dickens thing that had Callow playing dickens in it!

"What the Shakespeare is going on?!"

it was good, not quite what Charlie Brooker had billed it as (best thing ever on telly ever), but good all the same. it had more of the sapphire and steel's than quatermass (though speeded up by about a bazillion). i think all the stories so far have been equally enjoyable, and I LOVE that his catchphrase is "FANTASTIC!"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 9 April 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

I am starting to feel very strongly that we are overdue an alien planet story.

Don't hold your breath. This new show's deliberately all about the human condition.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

But it is going to have daleks in it! What do they tell us about the human condition?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

Argh don't make me spoil anything about the Dalek story.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

I should mention that there'll almost certainly be alien/other planet stories [though I've heard most of this year is all about Earth in one form or another], but in the end it'll always be about people.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)

Stap me vitals, but I really, really enjoyed the hell out of this ep. It was my first but between Callow being ridiculous and Gatiss writing, I reckon I was pretty damn spoiled. Poor Gwyneth.

Plus-Tech Whiz Kid (Disco) (Barima), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

I preferred Callow as the opera singer in Thunderpants.

Masked Gazza, Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

my sister says my dad is really enjoyin it!

(i can't honestly remember if he watched old-skool dr who ever)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

you know i was convinced that gwynedd was her out of casanova. t'internet put me right.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

haha i tht the young grieving man at the start wz a MCGANN!!¡¡

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)

bloody mark benton was in inspector lovely the other day too. and it was obv he was going to be the baddie BECAUSE he was in it, and then because the character kept being called in on too often.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 9 April 2005 23:30 (twenty years ago)

I was half-convinced that after the Gelft mentioned the time war, the Doctor was going to do something nasty to them - like what actually happened, only on purpose and without provocation.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 10 April 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

I know nothing but I'm betting that Daleks are...

...HUMAAANGS FROM THE FAR, FAR FYUUUU-CHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Sunday, 10 April 2005 00:40 (twenty years ago)

Well, the Kaleds did look rather human (as far as I can remember)

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 10 April 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)

Ratings back up - 8.3 million, apparently.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 10 April 2005 09:57 (twenty years ago)

more negativity dammit!

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 10 April 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)

i don't like the new theme tune much. will that do?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 10 April 2005 10:57 (twenty years ago)

The Doctor really fucks up

Or, as the Doctor put it "I think it's gone a bit wrong".

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 10 April 2005 17:04 (twenty years ago)

i watched it again earlier followed by Dr Who Confidential and everything seemed better, so ignore my negativity. I'm still intrigued by the film vs video thing though.

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 10 April 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

more negativity dammit!

I'm REALLY not understanding the love for this week's episode. I watched it with 3 other people, and we'd all thought eps 1 and 2 were FANTASTIC, but all thought this week's was nowhere near as good. The doctor-rants-at-dickens-in-the-carriage scene was painful to watch, clumsily written ("in what way do you resemble a means of keeping oneself cool?"...UGH, puh-lease) and something the doctor would surely never actually do? The increasing flirtiness between Rose and the doctor feels all wrong as well ("Not a bad life", "Better with two!" - stoppit! get off him!). The aliens-in-distress-are-actually-baddies plotline was ridiculously obvious, and the conclusion was lumpen. But worst of all was the doctor's "What about me? I'm going to die too!" line in the basement. I mean, by all means put the doctor in peril, but don't make him act like a pussy!

I'm happy to assume this is all Gatiss's fault though (admitedly, I never understood the love for LoG either), and I'm sure everything will be great again next week, once we're back into the RTD penned episodes.

(Things I did like this week though - the nicely creepy "metal birds!" scene, Rose's "No! I'm not letting you give them corpses" indignation, the Barbarella reference, and Billie looking quite cute with her hair up).

JimD (JimD), Sunday, 10 April 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and also, pedantically, at one point Dickens says "On with the motley". But the origin of that phrase is Leoncavallo's I Pagliacci, the libretto for which wasn't written until 1892. I had doubts about the use of "a good innings" and "stiffs" in 1869 as well, although I might be wrong about those, maybe they're justifiable.

JimD (JimD), Sunday, 10 April 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure "a good innings" would be fine - old cricketing phrase, innit? And Dickens popped a big village cricket scene into his first novel - so well known, it used to be illustrated on the back of the old ten pound note.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 11 April 2005 06:16 (twenty years ago)

motley is a good shakespearean word, so you could argue that a stage-struck ham like dickens wd not need to be quoting but could have come up with the phrase himself

also this might be a joke abt the dr believing they had arrived in 1890s naples!!

(OK both of these are reachin a bit: but anachronism is only a semi-serious crime in a series abt time travel!)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)

Why did the doctor say "never mind" about the death of Little Nell? I thought it was because it hadn't been written yet, but the end makes it clear that Dickens had finished his last book.

I'm with Jim: a lot of it seeemd strange and un-Doctorish. Though I did enjoy the jobsworthiness of the undertaker.

Is Rose going to be locked in a different room each week? Up next: the fiddly lock on the Tardis WC finally goes, and Rose realises to her horror that there is no ventilation.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

he said "read me the death of little nell: i like a good laugh" (stand-issue joke abt the sentimentality of that famous scene, dating to o.wilde, "the man who does not laugh at the death of little nell has a heart of stone"), then realised that dickens might be offended

i don't really understand the phrase "undoctorish"

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)

to me they've ALL been "undoctorish" since troughton!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:31 (twenty years ago)

It is the product of a disordered and sleepy mind. I will interrogate this mind again later, or maybe tomorrow.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:53 (twenty years ago)

> TARDIS still rub but i like the 'whale noises'

keys scrapped down piano strings, reversed and slowed down and probably a shedload of other stuff. by Delia, i think. was mentioned in the Radiophonic Workshop documentary on BBC4.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 11 April 2005 07:54 (twenty years ago)

i can see McCoy doing a similar 'i can't die yet - not here!' type of exclamation.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)

i thought the scene where the TARDIS disappears before a staggered Dickens was a fantastic shot as well in the 'classic Dr Who moment' sense.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Why some trad Who fans are desperately keen on keeping Doctor Who (both the show and the character) sexless and joyless is completely beyond me. 'Ooh he smiled at a gurl!' And all this constent fretting, 'the Doctor would never do this, would never do that'
WELL HE DOES NOW, ALRIGHT?

David Merryweather (DavidM), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)

perhaps mcGann was the dr going through puberty

Ed (dali), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)

I'm still loving Rose's wonderment at it all, her little moment of reflection in the Tardis "think about it, Christmas day, 1860. it happened once", and her first, tentative footstep in 1800s virgin snow. And the Doctor's obvious glee with her amazement, like he's found a soul mate he can share his enthusiasm with.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:26 (twenty years ago)

Baker C. had some i-dont-want-to-die stuff, including one very harsh scene w/Peri in his dalek story. Now granted maybe Colin is not the note you want yr Doctor to strike but he is a precedent.

I am enjoying the flirtation and I think it will be an important plot thing too (I'm not sure the Doctor is seeing it as 'flirtation').

Tom (Groke), Monday, 11 April 2005 08:47 (twenty years ago)

If he is the last Time Lord, he may need to find a way of passing on his genetic code. We look very similar, will he and Rose be compatible? He should use his sonic screwdriver to find out.

"You look pretty nice. For a human." So would she look many for a Time Lord. Even though Time Lords look like humans and Ecclestone isn't exactly a dish.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 11 April 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

it's a pity he destroyed gallifrey: he cd have gone on trial for inappropiate sexual behaviour in a tardis

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)

I'm hardly a trad Dr Who fan (I watched tom baker and peter davidson when I was little, but remember nothing about them really, and never watched any others until about a month ago), my "surely the doctor wouldn't do that?" is based on the evidence of the last two episodes more than my knowledge of the history of the character. In E1 and E2 we had a doctor who was a bit of an action hero really, who didn't always get things quite right but still seemed to be in control overall and was dynamic and motivated (so there's your sex and joy, right there). For that to suddenly change to "ooh, I've made a mistake and now I'm going to die, waaaa!" is what felt awkward and wrong to me.

JimD (JimD), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:10 (twenty years ago)

Ah yeah, that does make sense Jim. It was a weird line in that context, particularly as he didn't act it scared particularly, more a bit annoyed.

What's all this big bad wolf nonsense, then?

Tom (Groke), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:12 (twenty years ago)

(Soz Jim, my comment wasn't really directed at you but something that you said reminded me of the ridiculously hardline, fusty, died-in-the-wool trad dads who bridle whenever CE's Who so much as holds Rose's hand and other new-fangledness. Like any emotion whatsoever, and then of course there's The Gay Agenda).
But, fair play, Ecclestone/Doctor was the weakest link in TUD by far. Some inconsistances between the Doctor in eps 1&2 and ep 3 prob down to TUD being the first non-RTD script, maybes. Still, for the Dr to mess up completely was a nice subversion I thought, and his annoyance made sense as in 'this wasn't supposed to happen!'.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Monday, 11 April 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

but in Episode 1 the Doctor was about to die and you could see the look of fear on his face as he looked towards Rose, if he'd had the chance to say then what he said in Episode 3 he probably would've - I'm sure the thought crosses his mind every time he's staring at the face of Death, which is quite often. So is the difference between thinking it and saying it really so big?

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:04 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, it wasn't the fear of death itself that was the problem, it was the "what about me?". I mean, that dialogue started out with the doctor explaining to rose that yes, it was possible for her to die before she'd been born, and apologising for putting her in that situation. Rose then said it wasn't his fault, and that she'd chosen to put herself there. And somehow that prompted the doctor to launch into his "how do you think I feel!?" thing. So I guess that I'm not bothered by him being scared he might die, so much as his twattiness in bringing it up at that point, when he was meant to be comforting somebody else, and that somebody else was being very gracious about it.

But I feel like I'm getting too hung up on one little detail now. I'm sure everything will be great again next week, and it's not like this episode was even actively bad, it just wasn't up to the new series' own high standards.

JimD (JimD), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

my automatic kneejerk "benefit-of-the-doubt" antenna went "uh oh, historical ep = a bit crap, let's see how they motor very deliberately through said crap at high speed to get another notch under their belt"

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

my antenna like to mix metaphors!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

accoring to the today show (US) this morning, the "popular science fiction spoof called Doctor Who" got higher ratings than the Charles and CAmilla wedding.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 11 April 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

Surely it was Charles and Camilla wot was the spoof.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 11 April 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Desperate Princewives

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

Charles/Camilla wedding had more extra-terrestrial reptilians

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 11 April 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4450285.stm

Probably obvious anyway, but it's confirmed now.

lupine lupin (lupinelupin), Friday, 15 April 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

"I'm delighted that new, young viewers can now have the complete Doctor Who experience, as they witness their hero change his face!"

does this mean Eccleston will come back, then?

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 16 April 2005 02:29 (twenty years ago)

The BBC already said he is, I thought...

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 16 April 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)

was it just us, or was the sound and picture totally out of sync for the first 5 mins? was so annoying, but working now. weird.

colette (a2lette), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

Seemed fine to me. The message came through clearly: fat people are Evil. Eeeeeevil.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

I'm really not going to enjoy Smirky Mc Smirk as The Doctor.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

hmm, could have just been homechoice then? strange

what else has the downing street aide been in? he looks so familiar...

colette (a2lette), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

Simon Pegg's mum from Shaun of the Dead was bringing people cups of coffee and hiding in a cupboard!

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

BEST ONE YET. FANTASTIC!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

downing street aide was Kurt from Teachers. Penelope Wilton = shaun's mum

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Peking Homonculus!

RickyT (RickyT), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, best one yet!

RickyT (RickyT), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)

i clapped a LOT.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)

I hope this means the Brigadier(Retd) is going to make an appearance in the next episode.

RickyT (RickyT), Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

David Icke was right!

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Saturday, 16 April 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

i liked the artifice of: "who's prime minister now then?" "how'd i know i've been away for a year". HO HO!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 16 April 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

David Icke was right!

If only they'd been more ... lizardly!

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 16 April 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

so.....what was the point of having a "on next weeks show" bit JUST AFTER THE CLIFFHANGER???? gah.

zappi (joni), Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:13 (twenty years ago)

I liked that the really crap alien pig thing turned out to be a fake really crap alien pig thing. You get 2 minutes of thinking "£600K AN EPISODE AND THE MONSTERS ARE STILL SHITE!" before the Doctor reassures you by pointing out that it's a "mermaid" :-)

zappi otm. Do they have the slightest fucking notion of what a cliffhanger is?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)

it was a VERY scary cliffhanger for teh kids. seeing that the dr would be ok next week was some relief.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

I don't like the next-week trailer immediately either, though I wouldn't have thought too many viewers were thinking "Oh no! The Doctor is going to die! The rest of the series may turn out to be a little disappointing!"

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 17 April 2005 12:03 (twenty years ago)

it was a VERY scary cliffhanger for teh kids.

Well, yeah, but how is that a bad thing?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 17 April 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)

i wonder if it got more complaints from thicko parents than The Unquiet Dead.

the flatulence was a bit much but i like how the show is really challenging my perceptions of what is 'acceptable' to do on British TV now. it really highlights the gravitas of the show's (or anything else like it on British TV in the last 15 years i.e. mainstream sci-fi with aliens, space etc.) lengthy absence. every episode i go 'oh that's just stupid' before remembering it's Dr Who.

i hope next week he asks why the Slitheen are naked though.

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 17 April 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

WE ARE THE SLITHEEN!!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 18 April 2005 08:11 (twenty years ago)

sounds a bit Harry Potter doesn't it

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 18 April 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)

there were so many wry "old who" knocks in there - intentional i suspect. zips on the forehead! the fact that the first monster we see was a bit crap etc.

also how could i forget to mention: "You're sooo gay!"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)

the stand-in pm was obv meant to be Prescott too!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 18 April 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)

oh yes the "chubby" aliums and the body suits reminded me of the ridiculous alien disguises in the Leisure Hive. (they're bigger on the inside than the outside!)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)

Surely the lady Slitheen was supposed to be Anne Widdecombe though.

Pacing was odd, but I was hungover when I watched it. No need for the "next week" agreed in a two parter (ie next week, the rest of the story).

What happens if Billie rings her Mum on her magic mobile phone. It seems a pity that this has been forgotten (or has it...)

Pete (Pete), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:05 (twenty years ago)

It sort of has to be brushed over. I don't get why Billie didn't ask to be taken back to the right time, but then maybe I read too many sci-fi books.

What is the history of power dynamics between the Doctor and his Assistants? How many of them have been doormats, how many have been able to exect regular pressure on him (Mark S seem to say above that this is their main purpose)?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)

(I am trying to work out why the prospect of the doctor falling in Wuv (and with a human!) annoys me)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:45 (twenty years ago)

I don't get why Billie didn't ask to be taken back to the right time

I pointed this out, and Robster said, "But then they wouldn't have a story." Fair enough. It could possibly be justified by the TARDIS being a hunk of junk and unable to be that precise anyway.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)

Also, I imagine they'd want to avoid any solve-everything-with-time-travel antics that would turn it into Dr. Who's Excellent Adventure (next week - Slitheen defeated when dustbins fall on their heads from nowhere)

lock robster (robster), Monday, 18 April 2005 09:55 (twenty years ago)

quite

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 10:07 (twenty years ago)

What puzzled me: if the Tardis regularly gets things wrong (12 months instead of 12 hours this week; Cardiff instead of Naples last week; lots and lots of things in past series), how come the Doctor managed to get it into exactly the right place/time in the pathology lab and back out again?

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 10:19 (twenty years ago)

short hops are more accurate?

koogs (koogs), Monday, 18 April 2005 10:36 (twenty years ago)

plot.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 18 April 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)

"trapped in a supplies cupboard next to a bunch of squaddies" = the right place/time? Except it was, I suppose. That sort of "luckily, a scream rang out" stuff usually annoys me, it's why I prefer the stories where everything is happening as normal (even if it includes giant Bertie Bassetts) until the doctor arrives, to the ones where everything happens to be coming to a head when he appears.

Of course, that could be a false distinction, maybe it's "suddenly, there was an uprising! (as there was every Tuesday)"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 10:46 (twenty years ago)

But doesn't the Tardis land itself, not at the wrong time due to absent minded Doctor, but at precisely the right time of it's own accord - ie: always right before danger rears it's head, so the Doctor is always in the thick of it. Hence Doctor being momntarily confused untill he hears scream/explosion/evil cackling laughter etc then it's all "fantastic!"

David Merryweather (DavidM), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:14 (twenty years ago)

"and it all started happening, just as YOU two turned up! arrest them!" - in my top 10 dr who lines. along with "I say we attack!" "No, we must wait for the doctor to get back" "Wait, that's all we ever do is wait! pah grumble" (etc)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)

Dr Who Confidential put me off Peri a bit, despite her obvious assets. I think the comic made her seem a better character, or something...

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:28 (twenty years ago)

I like the idea that short hops are easy (which makes sense, after all a slip of a year could be relatively easy to make when spinning and cranking and showing off with you big sticky out ears).

Also Billie had already spoken to her mum before the Doctor sorted it out, so there is probably some sort of corrupting your own personal timeline nonsense they might refer to.

I hope Wilton recurs as PM in future episodes (since that is clearly were this might be going). Wilton is great in genre fiction.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)

a few thousand miles wrong after -5 billion year jump is tiny error, 12 months out after a 150 year jump is still less than 1%. hop of no time to hospital a few miles away 1% error would be 50 feet or so.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

maybe he was aiming for the carpark? 8)

koogs (koogs), Monday, 18 April 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)

Thinking about it, I *like* the idea that within a story the Doctor doesn't use the Tardis because of the risk that it will just throw him off somewhere completely random. It's a good way to avoid the solve-everything-with-time-travel type of deus ex machina.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 18 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

It's usually plot-related as well: The commentary for Robots of Death has the writer saying "the first question in any Doctor Who story is 'how do we put the Tardis out of action?'"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

then it's: how do we separate dr and companion.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 April 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

> "the first question in any Doctor Who story is 'how do we put the Tardis out of action?'"

see, this is my issue with the sonic screwdriver...

koogs (koogs), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

Didn't the fourth once say that short hops were more accurate?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:07 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, koogs, that's what I was saying way up above, worrying about the magic mobile in a world with the Sonic Screwdriver in it isn't much use.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)

Sonic Screwdriver is a different issue though. That is the answer to "How does the doctor open doors, fix stuff when they are futuristic so any explaination witll be gobbledegook anyway".

Pete (Pete), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

In fact, that (some other that) is where the Doctor in Luv comes in handy, because now he has a reason not just to get into his ship and feck off.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

The entire show is about people placing their trust in someone because he has a commanding manner and is called The Doctor => Chris Morris will write and direct the second series.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

And he is (usually tho not in The Waking Dead) right.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 18 April 2005 13:22 (twenty years ago)

Just watched episode 4 after returning from US - totally loved it. A quick scan of some fan reviews shows predictable annoyance at the farting aliens stuff but I thought this was marvellously creepy, made the aliens seem much more uncontrolled and fleshly.

The Big Ben effect was rubbish! But a great moment nonetheless.

I am loving the "finally somebody notices that a companion has gone missing" storyline too.

Has everyone seen http://www.unit.org.uk?

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

"Still, it was probably a relief to all when the two decades from the mid-eighties onward turned out to be a period of relative peace, broken only by a few incidents, such as the 1995 Bonnybridge Cigar Confrontation. "

!! nice one. where did you find that? search-wise.net?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

It's linked on the official BBC site under 'alien hotline' or something. Also there's a grebt photoshop joke on whoisdoctorwho.com (which is officially in continuity it seems as its 'webmaster' is revealed to be Mickey!)

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

Mickey has taken over from Clive after his untimely death. ROFL!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:02 (twenty years ago)

(it's .co.uk btw)

http://www.whoisdoctorwho.co.uk/images/welcomealiens.jpg

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:05 (twenty years ago)

The Unit site is v.v.funny, especially the publications:

UTE-17 – "If you can't point it, don't fire it" Dealing with unconventional weapons

UTE-18 – "But what has happened to Luton?" Coping with common press enquiries

UTE-13b – "Corporal Cooper, is that really you?" – Recognising impersonation in the field*
(Please note UTE-13b replaces UTE-13: "Corporal Cooper's Behaving Strangely")

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:14 (twenty years ago)

Is the mutant pig the first ever non-human creature that hasn't proved impervious to UNIT bullets?

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:19 (twenty years ago)

"chap with snout, 4 rounds rapid"

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)

scuse my slowness - i've only just realised that that photoshop joke goes deeper, cos that's the one the tories were caught out doctoring themselves. it was in private eye, but also doc'd here http://www.toryscum.com/2005/04/12/ed-matts-photoshop/

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:35 (twenty years ago)

secure login: bison

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:47 (twenty years ago)

“The incident was caused by a batch of faulty plastic used in the manufacture of display dummies, combined with a gas main explosion. During manufacture, it seems that bubbles formed within the dummies. When exposed to high temperatures during and after the explosion, expansion of air within them caused them to distort and twist in a way that already panicked observers interpreted as movement.”

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:53 (twenty years ago)

The BBC has also registered badwolf.org.uk but there's nothing there yet (apparently).

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:56 (twenty years ago)

rec.arts.drwho is going gay conspiracy mental over some spoilers as to the sexuality of the upcoming second companion (he's bi).

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 10:58 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, could we have another thread for spoilers?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)

Oops, sorry.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:06 (twenty years ago)

the Dickens photo thing on http://www.whoisdoctorwho.co.uk/index4.shtml is, like, well lame, yeah?

$V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

so what is with BAD WOLF then, eh? i know the r.a.dw ppl have gone a bit nuts over this. any GOOD theories? like it's just RTD having a laff and teasing the ppl who pay TOO MUCH ATTENTION

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)

did anyone make the Bad Wolf connection as soon as they saw the pig/mermaid? or not until the Doctor's own 'big bad wolf' allusion?

$V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

Er, this is a silly question, but I want in on these newsgroup talks too, er... how does one join a "newsgroup"?! Aren't they like "really old interweb"?

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)

I thought it came from the graffiti that someone put on the Tardis in the last episode?

I do not understand. I think I must be being stupid about something.

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

Newsgroups: you can read them through Google (groups.google.com), or with software like Outlook Express (boo, hiss) or Mozilla.

(When I read newsgroups, I use Pan - but I think that's Unix-only)

caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

the 'Bad Wolf' graffiti not making any sense until either the pig or the Doctor's own BBW reference, is what I meant.

xpost

$V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

I go to the Google homepage and go through Google groups, they update every 12 hours or so I think. Also this way the temptation to actually post is avoided. r.a.d-w is pretty worthless, though, and in fact all groups are havens for complainers, but I don't mind it on the comics NGs as I agree more.

Re. Bad Wolf - from my hem hem researches I think there've been a few references:

- the Moxx of B. is heard muttering something about the "Bad Wolf scenario" in ep. 2
- Gwyneth in ep. 3 going on about "You've seen the bad wolf"
- The TARDIS being graffiti-ed in ep.4

I missed the Doctor referencing it himself, when was that?

I'm really really enjoying the sub-plotting, it counterbalances the "too rushed" criticisms.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

i totally missed those other Bad Wolf references from previous episodes (tho I STILL haven't seen episode 2)!


obvious conclusion: The Time War was caused by a wolf, but they replaced it's brain with a human's, but the only human brain they could find was Hitler's

$V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)

http://www.nspccknockout.fsnet.co.uk/images/wolf1.gif

Dear Russell T, you know what to do.

$V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:42 (twenty years ago)

...through a scientific mix of running and screaming...

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Haha. Mass weapons of destruction
"he's lying"
BBC's revenge!

Andy Jay, Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

45 seconds!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

This is the best program on TV ever.
Could Chris Morris have done this better?

Andy Jay, Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

It wouldn't have ten minutes about feelings.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

A obvious way to improve it = enough with the "next week", or don't give away the twist in them at least.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

I hope there's more Mickey to come in this series. Its immensely entertaining watching the Doctor act like a complete cunt to him.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 23 April 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

Yay, the Daleks are back next week. We all cheered when theyappeared, ill tempered as always.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Saturday, 23 April 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

He went soft on Mickey (!) at the end (!(sorry)).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 23 April 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

I thought this week's was a bit rub. Loads of good bits but the whole UN / missile codes / Mickey-does-"War Games" plot and resolution were k-lame.

Next week on the other hand - :):):):)

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 23 April 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Good bit: You were born in the dark Mickey

Bad bit: 45 seconds WMD blah blah load of bollocks.

Oh, and that sub-harpoon must have been refuelled mid-flight, 6 times.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Saturday, 23 April 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)

pickled onions to the rescue! hurray!

hairs on back of neck stood up during the 'next week' preview...

is 6 and 7 another two-parter?

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 23 April 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

No. 9 and 10 and 12 and 13 are two-parters.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 23 April 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

"we're in" = best episode ever.

(actually not, but still my favourite line in anything ever tho)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

meanwhile that virus isn't working v well. i just tried buffalo on that unit site, and "MISSILES LAUNCHED" *gasp*

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

Mickey has admitted on his site that he's not going to use the virus though.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah
Thing is: I can't bring myself to use it.

You see, he's off, making another decision for us, all "I'm the big bad wolf and it's way past your bedtime."

do you think the bad wolf thing was a total blind then? i hope so.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

also, are UNIT all dead then?

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Saturday, 23 April 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

The final ten minutes or whatever were the best, esp the ending.
I'm not bothered about watching next week, it doesn't look too good.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)

Next week's looks as if it might be as good as Charlie Brooker claimed the Mark Gatiss one was.

Is the "Big Bad Wolf" thing the reason for "Rose" being called "Rose", ie. is she "Little Red Riding Hood" fot this particular plot's purpose? If the plot actually exists.

And more importantly - can wolves be gay?

Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Sunday, 24 April 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)

Gay Todd from Coronation Street is in next week's episode. This may play second fiddle by quite some way to DALEKS (chained up old Daleks at that), but still...

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 24 April 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)

(is he the second assistant of dubious sexuality - is that poor lad being typecast after leaving Corrie so as not to be typecast as a gayist?)

I would so vote for Harriet Jones. Penelope Wilton in this + Shaun of the Dead = best mumsy matter-of-fact unexpected heroine ever.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 24 April 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

DALEK BONDAGE!

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Is it wrong to have been so annoyed by the Doctor's oh-so-swift escape into the lift? (YES). too much enemy dawdling as ever, v impressed by the missile picking out 10 Downing St so successfully tho...but why didn't they just use a massive VINEGAR BOMB?

laughed out loud @ 45 seconds thing but thought Billie's use of 'lots of planets have a North' line was milking it

worst episode yet for me! but still much fun - but i won't get to see next week's until the following Wednesday, argh

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 24 April 2005 08:25 (twenty years ago)

I also laughed out loud at the "Massive Weapons of Destruction available for use in 45 seconds!" line.

When the Doctor, Rose and Thingy Whatsit MP For Somewhere North share a glass of port to celebrate exploding the alien with pickles, the Doctor seemed to choke on the mouthful of port he took. I thought this was going to be a Plot Point - "this port has gone sour! giving us a source of alien-defeating ethanoic acid!" Sadly, I was wrong.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

"Hold on, you're going to triplicate? The flammability?"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 24 April 2005 12:13 (twenty years ago)

The face that Ecclestone pulls after that line make me think that either he is going to have to stop mugging or I'm going to have to get used to it, pretty soon.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 24 April 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)

Really like delving into the lives of those left behind when an assistant goes on there travels in these two episodes. Usually too easily ignored in the old (original/classic?) series. Either: own civilisation/family/livelihood is gone/boring/worth leaving, or half-hearted attempts such as Ace's return to Perivale.

All parties, esp Rose, seem quick to accept the Doctor situation, I thought, the poor Mum esp. And Mickey is bonkers not to go with them.

humpy, Sunday, 24 April 2005 12:20 (twenty years ago)

45 seconds made me laugh, and also made me wonder if it would be a point only understood by those listening to the commentary when rewatching these episodes in decades to come. Has DW done political satire before btw?

humpy, Sunday, 24 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/news/drwho/2005/04/21/18788.shtml

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 24 April 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)

"Did it begin with bu- or with fu- ?" he ponders aloud.

The state of kids today.

humpy, Sunday, 24 April 2005 13:35 (twenty years ago)

but where are the fear factors (1 to 5) shown? :-(

also, i wonder what rec.arts.gay-agenda make of a 4 year old watching a show that blatantly talks about prostitutes and, whatever else it was that upset them

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

i am loving all the 45 seconds type enormous references to real life, roots it nicely in the here & now but piss-funny every now and again too.
some of this week's was SO over the top! half expected eccles to break out into song just after he worked out the name of the planet the slitheen were from. awesome. this gets better and better.
one thing i missed from last week's but housemate pointed out today was the id cards line: "thank you all for wearing your id cards. they'll make it easier to identify the bodies", do you think it was a deliberate ref to d4v1d antichrist blvnk3tt's evil scheme or just setup for a typical baddie mwa-hah-hah-hah-hah line?

emsk, Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

A bit of the second, as well showing how they were electrifying the experts.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 24 April 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Look at us we're doing the political satire, 45 seconds id cards WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ALERT ALERT THIS IS A TOPICAL REFERENCE fat fucking farting fat cat politicians aren't we funny and knowingly so. Look, look, we're making jokes they wouldn't stoop to in a student rag!
Load of shite. Unnecessary shite.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 24 April 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

pretty good!

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 24 April 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)

Who TV 'previous' re. political satire

The Curse Of Peladon, 1973 - will backwards-looking Peladon enter the EEC, I mean Galactic Federation? Galactic Federation run by androgynous surrender monkeys and sinister 'reformed' militarists.

The Monster Of Peladon, 1974 - overlong sequel in which Peladon takes six Saturday teatimes to deal with a miners' strike.

The Sun Makers, 1978 - script writer gets huge tax bill, writes both-barrels attack on tax system which culminates in workers throwing taxman off a multi-storey car park roof. This is a totally great story.

Vengeance On Varos, 1985 - placid populace watches Reality TV murders and torture. Doctor joins in.

The Happiness Patrol, 1987 or so - Sylvester McCoy deals with megalomaniac Thatcher analogue. I don't know my McCoys but this may be the one with the Barratt sweet monster.

I'm not counting the appearances of 'men from the ministry' in every Pertwee UNIT story - they are always plump bunglers who get in the Brigadier's way forcing him to 'contact Geneva', quite a feat to be regularly less competent than the Brig you might think.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 24 April 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

There's nothing wrong with political satire. It's outright clumsiness I have a problem with.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Sunday, 24 April 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)

The two words 'id cards' do not in and of themselves constitute a political satire.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 24 April 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

I think the only wholly successful Who political stories were the first Peladon (cos it's a good story, rather than a satire first) and the Sunmakers because it's so gloriously irritated. I had no problems with the gags this time, gags is all they were, but they didn't improve the episode for me.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 24 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

I'm always misreading this thread title as "Doctor Who Knew?"

Maria :D (Maria D.), Sunday, 24 April 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

Oh well, DALEKS next week lads!

Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Monday, 25 April 2005 01:53 (twenty years ago)

Dalek isn't it? Just one of them. I think the last stories (episodes 12 & 13) might be with the Daleks. Don't quote me on it though, we will need to wait and see.

K-9, Monday, 25 April 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)

is anyone in london videoing them? we're away for the next couple of episodes, and can't video for irritating homechoice reasons...

toby (tsg20), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)

Yeah we are Toby, series and confidential.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:21 (twenty years ago)

toby, are you getting a flickering vertical b/w lines/barcode sort of thing? when i first set up hc i couldn't video, but there are some settings on channel 999 that you can set to sort this. JSL

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)

PROOF after all that Rose DOES live in Peckham, as we saw those missiles speeding NORTH from Dover to x the river over to 10 Downing Street! KNEW IT! I KNEW IT!

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:25 (twenty years ago)

of course the gags are unnecessary, that's why they're so funny. love the way they're skipping about so delighted with themselves the whole time...

emsk, Monday, 25 April 2005 09:16 (twenty years ago)

have UNIT been effectively wiped out then?

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:19 (twenty years ago)

alan - i haven't actually investigated (it's colette's homechoice/vcr), but i think that's what happens, yeah. what does JSL=?!

toby (tsg20), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

Unit needs restocking on alien experts, I'm sure there are plenty of others monster experts, it-came-from-the-deep experts and redshirts.

Maybe Mickey will sign up.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:38 (twenty years ago)

JSL = jus sayen laik

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

When Mickey said "we're in" I immediately thought of little Alan's brightened face.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)

Dr Who Confidential pointed out that the old unit guy is alive and well, retired but alive...

koogs (koogs), Monday, 25 April 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)

is anyone in london videoing them? we're away for the next couple of episodes, and can't video for irritating homechoice reasons...

You have broadband?

You could torrent them them from Uknova or BTefnet.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 25 April 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

don't UK Nova refuse to do Dr Who on account of it being new and out on DVD pretty soon anyway?

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

Hmm looks like they are stopping it after the announcment of the DVD.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 25 April 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)

my uknova membership has lapsed anyway :-(

toby (tsg20), Monday, 25 April 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)

ep5 is up there though

http://www.uknova.com/details.php?id=9602

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:00 (twenty years ago)

Argh, I wish there were a way to see the older new messages without reloading the entire 800 post thread... is it time for a new thread yet? Please?

Anyway, it was well worth rushing home from the Lambeth Walk for. I know for a fact that Rose lives in Peckham because we could see the other side of the big towerblocks from the Lambeth walk!

How excited were we to see the Dalek? Though it's kind of astonishing how close the Dalek voice and the Cartman voice are. Exterminate! Come back here or I'll kick yr ass, kitty! etc.

Lapdog Shoesnog (kate), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)

I'm hating these episode titles though - 'Aliens Of London'? 'World War Three'? next week's is just called 'Dalek' - I mean come on (tho maybe the latter is a ref to 'Robot'?)

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

No, I think it's just the don't want to give it B-movie names anymore, and grand titles don't quite suit 45min slots. "LAST KICK OF THE OLD FRIEND" or similar would be just plain stoopid.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)

***SPOILER***

It's cos there's only one dalek in it, innit!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)

one Dalek = call it by it's first name (Trevor? Siegfried? Geraldo?)

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:17 (twenty years ago)

Daleks don't have names! (But cybermen do!)

Tom (Groke), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

For your Dr Who t0rren7 needs:

http://www.btefnet.net/

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Monday, 25 April 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

toby, are you getting a flickering vertical b/w lines/barcode sort of thing? when i first set up hc i couldn't video, but there are some settings on channel 999 that you can set to sort this. JSL

i've never managed to get the homechoice box and vcr working at the same time at all, i have to turn the box off to get any vcr signal, for some reason. i'm wondering if it's something to do with old tv and not enough scart slots. we'll have to talk homechoice when we're back from our trip, alan, would be grateful for any tips...hasn't been important yet, but yeah. missing two weeks of dr who and, um, the OC is pretty sad. and so am i, clearly.

colette (a2lette), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

My god what a brilliant show.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

Anyone got a tape of Episode 2 they'd care to lend me?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:45 (twenty years ago)

Yeah if I remember Matt - are you coming to the Reynolds thing? Or out on Friday?

Daleks on about five different TV Guide covers.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)

Peckham doesn't have big towerblocks in it. It has one towerblock. Unless of course you are venturing into North Peckham, aka Walworth, aka not Peckham.

Alix with an i? (alix), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:54 (twenty years ago)

Maybe it's Camberwell, then. I know that I can see it from Kennington. But I don't leave Lambeth to go into those other icky parts of South London.

Lapdog Shoesnog (kate), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

Dude it's totally the estates on Queens Road shot cunningly. ALLOW IT.

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)

Camberwell also devoid of towers. Walworth road and the Aylesbury Estate my bet.

Alix with an i? (alix), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)

Not even the BBC would dare go into the Queens Road estates. Have you ever seen anyone come back out from there? No, me neither.

Alix with an i? (alix), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

Well it is actually Cardiff pretending to be Peckham so we can allow a little bit of movement in there I supose. I have waited at the bus stop there often enough but it is true, there is never any movement OMG it is full of the VICTORIAN ALIENS IN THE PIPE NOW IT IS ALL CLERE.

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

Ell - Eh - Vate!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

This should totally have called this "I, Dalek".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

They could at least have made it a musical.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

Bah, a perfect opportunity for a did he didn't he get in the tardis ruined. Enough with this coming next week rubbish.

Other than that, bloody brilliant. I've only seen two and I've never been so excited about a drama serial.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

Two thoughts:

The portrait of Van Statten behind his desk looked very Citizen Kane.

The spit running down The Doctor's chin when he was shouting at the Dalek when it was holding Rose hostage - was that deliberate?

The 'coming next week...' worked on me tonight - I'm looking forward to The Editor.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

Daleks regenerated! Tired objections of belittlers - run up a flight of stairs, not at all articulate, grab its eye piece/gun, just push it away etc etc overcome - even the sucker was given a use!

Three way swivling!

Evil + super-intellegence = total danger!

First ever proper look at mutated Kaleds eye!

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

I assume the last 2 episodes will deal with how Gallifrey and the daleks all get blown up by the doctor.

K-9, Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

Maybe - heard a rumour that the Bad Wolf references would be filled in - even that the TBA episode title would indeed be that.

Also: very evident Bad Wolf reference in this episode.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

I was intrigued that the Dalek regenerated after touching a human time traveller - does this mean that any of the companions could in theory regenerate too?

I did not spot the Bad Wolf reference. Clearly I wasn't paying attention.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

I have never bought a DVD boxed set in my life. I am on the verge of pre-ordering this one.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

Also, all the usual references were given an airing - was this the first time a Dalek episode has mentioned pepper-pot?

Cross-post: Bad Wolf = Call-sign of the helicopter landing early on.

The Dalek's regeneration had to do with the 'cellular structure of a time-traveller' - ie I think that she had been zipping about in the TARDIS was enough. Bit of a story device that, really.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

It was the first episode I found genuinely exciting - they did make a single Dalek into a genuine major threat. I liked the 'Broken - broken - hair-dryer' bit too.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

look at the name of the 2nd last episode in the series.
http://www.gallifreyone.com/epguide.php

K-9, Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

Bad Wolf confirmed as title of episode 12:

http://www.gallifreyone.com/newstv.php#newsitemEEEuyZyupyDjDQQbrq

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

The part with Rose running towards the closing bulkhead really was rather nail-biting for me.

I've been saying for years that modern hair-dryers look like sci-fi weapons, so I also laughed at the broken weapons scene

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

Tired objections of belittlers - run up a flight of stairs

<pedant>Actually, they already covered this during the Sylvester McCoy Dalek episode</pedant> (though in fairness I'd be amazed if 10% of today's audience knew).

Also: you're all mad, that was terrible.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)

Oops. Lazy with checking the cross-post there.

My completely outre theory of Bad Wolf:

The Doctor as we see him now - as in Christopher Eccleston - is in some way or other AN IMPOSTER! As in someone disguising themslelf to beguile and take in a innocent such as Rose/Little Red Riding Hood.

More outre: Although somehow it is also the genuine Doctor AT THE SAME TIME! Because Sci-Fi allows such impossibilities.

Even more outre: This is why we didn't see the regeneration - because there wasn't one!

Totally outre: Paul McGann is being held in the Tardis/distant time and planet/a quarry, and will come back to Rose before turning into David Tennant.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

Actually, they already covered this during the Sylvester McCoy Dalek episode (though in fairness I'd be amazed if 10% of today's audience knew).

Actually I think you'll find that it was first dealt with in 'TV 21' back in the sixties in fact actually actually.

But people were still making snide stairs references. Can't really blame them for not knowing about the McCoy episodes I suppose.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)

Arrgh! The ILE droid has deleted my [Pedant] markings! It looked like I actually siad that middle sentence and meant it! I didn't, Andrew.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

DNA / Time energies regeneration - worst new series technobabble yet. I mean, what?

Other than that, pretty much a triumph. Except the stairs dalek still looks rub, sorry. I liked the double-edged climax a lot (if I read it right).

TWO HEARTS!!!!!! Is this still a major break from books continuity? Also - CYBERMAN HEAD!!! This had a lot for the fans.

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

My Bad Wolf theory...

...haven't got one, sorry!

Except - the references are probably ripples from some huge chronal event (i.e. destruction of Gallifrey). Is the Doctor following them or are they following him, though (in that the Tardis' wanderings are obviously less 'random' than ever).

There's a new rubbish website up for Van Stratten's interweb company, it's linked on http://whoisdoctorwho.co.uk

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

A Dalek ATE THE INTERNET! This is quite clearly the greatest thing ever.

I quite liked the Dalek/stairs thing - it was a popular myth that needed dispelled, and I thought it was the obvious way to do it - people with no knowledge of Daleks think "it doesn't have legs, let's just run up the stairs" and then get proved wrong.

I felt quite sorry for the Dalek at the end (apart from the fact that it was EVIL and also it didn't kill the Bond-baddie-esque interweb-owner). I'm also finding that I'm liking Billie as an actress more than I thought I would. But she can't have a thing for Todd-off-Coronation-Street - she's already got Mickey and the Doctor issues without introducing another love interest for her.

Next week: SIMON PEGG!!!

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

simon bloody pegg

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't look like Bruno Langley is going to be around very long - he's listed for this and the coming episode only on GallifreyOne. And anyway, its Billie who gets the pre-title billing.

He might be a bit of an Adric character, talking to the Doctor closer to his own level. But my guess is that you're right, the Rose interest turmoil will be played more.

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

I read somewhere that he had the option of being in the next series.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 30 April 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

You be the Dalek!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/games/index.shtml

h., Saturday, 30 April 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

guhhh. i am stuck in the wrong country. is there a good link to get these episodes via bittorrent and such?

tom west (thomp), Sunday, 1 May 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)

Two hearts! - mentioned in the Five Doctors at least, and vaguely remember other places. Was this changed for the books then?

h., Sunday, 1 May 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)

I can remember the two hearts being mentioned in Sylvester McCoy's first episode - isn't it how he proves to Mel that he really is The Doctor?

A Dalek ATE THE INTERNET! This is quite clearly the greatest thing ever.

My reaction to that was: it'll be driven mad by pron!

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 1 May 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

Tired objections of belittlers - run up a flight of stairs

was there ever an episode where a Dalek WAS foiled by a flight of stairs...? or was it just assumed by viewers that they couldn't go up them?

Slumpman (Slump Man), Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:05 (twenty years ago)

Dalek foiled by slope in Destiny of the Daleks with the Dr deliberately taunting them (Douglas Adams script ed). Tom: Dr's two hearts has been in loads of stories

ja, Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:23 (twenty years ago)

The two hearts thing goes back to Pertwee at the very least (if not Troughton).

I am very happy with this series so far, although I Would have been happier had they actually named the Cyberman because when someone asks you "What is that?" most people tend to say, "That is XXX", not some cryptic "OH IT IS AN AULD FRIEND OF MINE OR SHOULD I SAY ENEMIE HEM HEM FANS START WANKING NOW!" bullshit.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 1 May 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

naming it as a cyberman would have clashed with the METALTRON joke. too many stupid names for aliens spoil the broth

Slumpman (Slump Man), Sunday, 1 May 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)

They could have called the Dalek a Cyberman. (Yeah, tenuous. I know.)

(Also they lost a total opportunity when Rose asked the Dalek what it wanted; it should have said "CHIPS. I-WANT-CHIPS.")

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 1 May 2005 10:51 (twenty years ago)

i wanted new-emotional dalek to ask "what is.... love?"

Slumpman (Slump Man), Sunday, 1 May 2005 10:55 (twenty years ago)

If they had done a surreal montage of the Dalek experiencing emotions and set it to "What Is Love?" by Deee-Lite, I would give all of my future children to the BBC as indentured servants.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 1 May 2005 10:58 (twenty years ago)

Clearly the Dalek recognised Rose because it had abosrbed the whole internet presumably including lots of badly-Photoshopped Billie porn and was actually dripping ejaculate in that final scene. I was a little disappointed it didn't go U R ALL GAY! at one point.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 1 May 2005 11:01 (twenty years ago)

The Dalek ate the bloody internet when I tried to post my last reply.

Anyway, it wasn't terrible in every aspect, I quite liked "You would have made a fine Dalek" (possibly because I can't remember what it's a reference to), and obviously it's vital in establishing that this Doctor is a complete cunt. Or rather, that the previous one was, and this one is feeling an emotional overspill from the events in question. But as regards the actual episode, the only way it could have redeemed itself would be if the Dalek's last words were "Rosetyler, is this what it feels like... when doves cry?"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 1 May 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

OMG imagine the Dalek humping the side of a bathtub and then crawling seductively across a rose-petal-strewn floor.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 1 May 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)

"IS! THIS! LOVE! THAT! I'M! FEELING? IS! THIS! THE! LOVE! THAT! I'VE! BEEN! WAITING! FOR?"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 1 May 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)

I cried when the Dalek killed himself - not floods or anything, but tear in the throat, lump in the eye etc. I still think the Daleks are a bit crap but I think the Dalek voice is one of the greatest inventions in TV history.

Dadaismus (Dada), Sunday, 1 May 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)

'how does it feel?' = best dalek line ever. apart from exterminate of course.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Sunday, 1 May 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

The two hearts thing that Tom says is a break with *books* continuity is because [books spoilers ahead] in The Adventress Of Hentietta Street, the Doctor is reduced to one heart. But I'm pretty sure that by this stage, he's got the other back again (although I can't remember where or how right now), so there isn't a problem anyway.

Not that continuity actually matters any more. It's just stories that count.

Ian Edmond (ianedmond), Sunday, 1 May 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

so, daleks have feelings too...

dr who confidential another mine of information this week - dalek's name was actually barnaby.

bless.

rose should've ducked under blast door as it was rising. they may be able to climb stairs now but they are still shit at limbo.

koogs (koogs), Sunday, 1 May 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I was asking the continuity question Ian answers. I am glad he still has two hearts.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 1 May 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)

Radio 4's Thought for the Day. ON DALEKS!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/ram/today3_tftd_20050502.ram

h., Monday, 2 May 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

He gets the other one back in Timeless or Sometime Never...; I don't remember which one but basically after they dispose of Sabbath the Doctor gets his time-travelling heart back.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 2 May 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

One ROFFLETASTIC detail; an American army made up of nothing but white people!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 2 May 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

One ROFFLETASTIC detail; an American army made up of nothing but white people!

The private army of a rich, white megalomaniac, holed up in a ex-nuclear bunker in Utah, made up of nothing but white people? Somewhat more plausible.

chris j (chris j), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

There was no indication they were a private army, though. Dude controlled the government so it's not a stretch that a company would be assigned to his "pet project"; also why would a private army have American flags on their uniforms?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

an lj entry http://www.livejournal.com/users/__kali__/218691.html#cutid1 refers to a minor comment in a recent DWM article

"Acording to RTD's production notes in DWM following the book continuity directly would make the BBC's public charter go BOOM as people would be obliged to spend money on the books to understand the story"

so i think they are ignoring books entirely. this is the canon within the canon

ja, Monday, 2 May 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

I prefered the idea that the Dalek "evolved" the E-Le-Vate from Billie, as if Daleks had never considered the stair problem before and a nineteen yearl old girls from Peckham was smarter than them.

Also hoping for the Dalek to self destruct due to believing too much contraidctory information from t'interweb.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 10:54 (twenty years ago)

She's not very good is she, Billie Piper, where is she from 'cos she can't do a London accent

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 11:05 (twenty years ago)

Stage School.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 11:13 (twenty years ago)

Swindon.

MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

Best rubber monster ever! Or was it CGI? If so I couldn't tell. It was THAT good.

Other things: More satire! More a kind of political commentary this time. The Doctor can be a very cross person. Simon Bash the PEGG! Tamisn GRIEG! The return of the Face of BO!

h., Saturday, 7 May 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

Yay Pegg! Yay Greig!

I liked the Face Of Boe popping up.

I did not spot any Bad Wolf references. Then again, I never do.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 7 May 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

The Face of Boe was on BadWolf TV

Greig (treefell), Saturday, 7 May 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

... which just goes to prove my point there!

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 7 May 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

This was a really enjoyable episode, I must say... reminded me very pleasantly of Graham Williams era stories like "The Pirate Planet" and "The Sunmakers". Pegg was great, as was Davies's writing. Again, a bit of satire, and fine juggling of comedy, melodrama, chills and righteousness...

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 8 May 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)

The one thing I didn't like about the episode was: we're 200,000 years in the future. But The Doctor thinks the technology's all wrong. "This technology's too old. It's like they've been held back - by about 90 years". That amount of precision sounded ridiculous compared with the date. And then, of course, Satellite Five has been running for 91 years - DO YOU SEE! *hits viewers around the head with the Plot Stick*

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 8 May 2005 07:39 (twenty years ago)

It's only 20,000 I think. But yes, good political satire = bad genre fiction in general, and certainly here, where you get a man in control of all facts about anyone who doesn't notice an infinite credit chip being issued, and a monster made up of an enormous mouth and sharks-teeth who can kill someone without a scratch and run a space station without moving from his spot. And the bizarre sight of Simon Pegg talking on a headphone to someone in the same room.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 8 May 2005 08:17 (twenty years ago)

I have it on good authority that the coming episode is going to be one of the BEST EVER. Subject to taste.

h., Sunday, 8 May 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)

headphone = translater to/from alienese?
monster kills w.bad breath?

surely the satire on orgs which "know everything" is always that they CAN'T know everything*: that they will overlook something small and not in their mind (cf also LoTR!!) --- anyway ecclestone used his sonic screwdriver to get infinite credit, so presumably it has an "infinite credit w/o being noticed setting")

*if they did they'd know why and how not to be evil!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 8 May 2005 10:44 (twenty years ago)

(this wz the least manic ep so far)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 8 May 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

Isabel was away yesterday so I've not watched Bash The Pegg yet, but! I did catch the next week thing, those monsters look fantastically rub!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 10:51 (twenty years ago)

i thought it was a real clunker as a story :-(

still like the dialog and style ("He's your boyfriend" = "YOURS!"), but that was def worse than TEOTW even.

ja (_ja_), Sunday, 8 May 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

I downloaded 'Dalek' the other night and I thought it was superb - why has no-one mentioned the 'I - AM - ALONE - IN - THE - UNIVERSE!" line? my heart just melted right there, poor little bastad. I was hoping it would escape rather than kill itself, to roam the wilds of Utah eventually stumbling upon a secret passage that leads all the way to the Whitehouse.

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 8 May 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)

plz photoshop loneliest dalek into this painting k thx bye:

http://ag.arizona.edu/~epfirman/hopper.gif

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 8 May 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

I did catch the next week thing, those monsters look fantastically rub!

I am guessing from the trailer that next week's episode will be to explain why The Doctor can't just go back in time to fix random stuff. Because if he did, he'd be attacked by giant flying gargoyles whose job is to Mend Time.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 8 May 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)

It makes no sense at all tho cos he's saving people all the time who would otherwise have died - theyre just not his companion's dad.

It seems to me that time travel shows shouldnt have stories that look too closely at the whole idea of it.

That said as a story I bet it's going to be grebt.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

Tom is right - what would be 'back' in time for a Time Lord? This week's episode seemed to me to imply that the Doctor knew how that period was supposed to be, and was rectifying it. The problem with 'changing history' is only solved, that I have seen, in two ways. One is deeply stupid: some force in the universe forces things back on track (see Final Destination, for example) - if they go with that, surely that means the Doctor can never achieve anything at any time where he has any future knowledge that might contradict things, which for a Time Lord is presumably rather a lot. The other is the multiple universes theory, that saving Rose's dad simply switches into a universe where he survived (even saved by a time-travelling daughter - I don't think that's a problem in this theory at all), but then you end up with everything a time-traveller does causing this, which leaves you without any clear way of going home, and an incomprehensible mess all round.

The Doctor has saved this world, in particular, so often without any sense that he knows the outcome in advance. I don't think he's ever said "Just sit back and relax - I know the Daleks/Cybermen/giant alien koalas don't take over the Earth."

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 8 May 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

Of course maybe part of what makes a Time Lord a Time Lord is being able to alter history without attracting the winged time beasts, so maybe it's Rose intervening that causes it. Still doesnt make much sense tho!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

"Just sit back and relax - I know the Daleks/Cybermen/giant alien koalas don't take over the Earth."

he didn't know what would happen with The Slitheen although he did seem quite casual about the whole scenario. i like to think that he knows he could intervene and save more people/change situations but realises it would cause a knock-on effect and result in something even worse happening probably, as a direct result of his meddling. it's like when the fourth Doctor had the chance to destroy the Daleks before they even came into being but he just couldn't handle that responsibility. which in turn means i'm very interested in finding out why the Ninth HAD to destroy the Daleks ("i had no choice") so roll on Bad Wolf.

$V£N! (blueski), Sunday, 8 May 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

Destroying them b4 they exist is very different tho. The arguments I've heard go:

- Existence of daleks helps other races of the galaxy unite not fight!
- Doc4 changes history ANYWAY by sowing doubt in Davros which means he survives dalek attempt to kill him, daleks with Davros terminally factional and useless, Daleks w/o Davros deadly time-travelling universe conquerors.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

even within the multiverse version, there could surely be a distinction between a finite (= acceptable tolerances) multiverse, and an infinite - prey to winged beasts - multiverse

eg as per chaos theory, systems have all kinds of variations built into them which still basically point in the same direction, but CERTAIN variations (even apparently tiny ones) which bring about systemic breakdown: maybe being a time lord allows you to be supersensitive to the latter, but the reasons you would be sensitive to the former are what humans are eg more sensitive to

(ie to rose "my dad is dead" is more horrible than "the universe is coming to pieces; to the doctor it's vice versa)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 8 May 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

That's a good theory! It might be a bit complicated to explain or use, but I like it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 8 May 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

It makes no sense at all tho cos he's saving people all the time who would otherwise have died - theyre just not his companion's dad.

But has he saved the life of someone who has already died? Rose's dad did die, was dead in the future - his daughter went back and changed that(+changed the future).
I don't know much about DW's 'history' but seems to me he operates in only this universe and if he saves someone/thwarts baddie - even if he has just suddenly appeared from another time - he was 'meant' to, and if someone dies they're dead dead dead.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 8 May 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

What does 'already died' mean in this context?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 8 May 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

I have now seen the episode. It was pretty good I thought - solid stuff, not likely to be anyone's favourite come the end of season, Bash The Pegg was terrific though. Isabel thought the satire was a bit rub.

Other Tom is right - this was a total Sunmakers tribute, except with "taxation" replaced by "media". But I adore the Sunmakers so I didn't mind.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:15 (twenty years ago)

it IS a good point about the similarity to the Sunmakers, i give you that. but because both are generic sci fi premise #129 that doesn't excuse the tv show made in 2005. no real story again, and the doctor STILL just a passive catalyst. bah

ja (_ja_), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

How is the doctor a passive catalyst? He turns up, twigs something's wrong, goes to sort it out having done the groundwork and found some allies, confronts the baddie, lets ally know how to beat baddie, baddie gets beaten. This is like 50% of all Dr Who stories ever. OK the letting know bit doesnt usually happen with him clapped in irons.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)

that sounds like a passive catalyst to me! in that he doesn't DO anything physical. it's all info and that. i suppose i'm not really mad at that being the case - it's more modern than say building a device with a collander on the front to switch off the baddies, which WOULD disappoint.

also i think i missed the "how to beat baddie" bit. i'd have to watch again, but it looked like ally goes "right!" then uses magical scifi device in reverse, causes system failure, upsets the aliums clever life support, bang.

i got the heat pump thing OK, but the method of upsetting the balance didn't seem to make sense.

ja (_ja_), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)

I think its the confronts-the-baddie stuff that I don't see as passive.

Yeah, I guess there was a taking for granted that interfacing with the amazing wonder gizmo would switch off the heat pump, when thingummy sat down in the chair I thought what she might be doing was transmitting everything to all 600 channels so the world would go "OH NO AN ALIEN" and realise The Truth. I still find this more forgiveable though than the magic password buffalo.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

you are right, i overstate the passive thing. he actively ferrets out the problem - that's characteristic curiosity we are familiar with. it's a new convention that the story's resolution is not directly in the hands of the doctor - he has a new facilitating role. it'll take some getting used to, but I suppose it shouldn't surprise me as it is THE modern approach to inverting the standard plot mechanic.

ja (_ja_), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

Dudes, Dr Eccles was looking right at salarygirl who was cowering round the corner from Pegg's boudoir listening to The Truth while he was explaining how the beast would explode mightily if it got any warmer - he was telling her directly how to save the day.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 9 May 2005 07:40 (twenty years ago)

Yes I know but it still relies on the off-chance that the equipment for broadcasting and recieving head data stuff is the same equipment that regulates the heating!

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 May 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

The head stuff just connected you to the central computer; and it was by getting full access to the computer that The Doctor found out about the plumbing configuration. So, presumably, anyone with full computer access could have done it.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 9 May 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

I didn't like the end:
He blows up the answerphone because people using technology from 200,000 years in the future would "change time".
Then he allows the lad with the click open LOOK TECHNOLOGY FROM 200,000 YEARS IN THE FUTURE! head to stay on Earth.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Monday, 9 May 2005 08:17 (twenty years ago)

all new updated cameo wishlist:

Bill Bailey
Dave Gorman
Anna Friel
Robert Carlyle
Peter Serafinowicz
Josie D'arby
Dizzee Rascal
Mackenzie Crook
Sanjeev Bhaksar
the ginger bloke from The Full Monty
Robbie Coltrane
Dexter Fletcher
Julia Sawalha
Bob Mortimer
Kevin Eldon

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 9 May 2005 08:27 (twenty years ago)

The whole Time War thing of course is completely routed in the changing history nonsense considering that it cannot take place anywhen as then Doc could go see Daleks / Time Lords even if it is jus fer laughs. It is clear that his "loneliness" is not just predicated on him knowing they will all die in the furture (we all know that), but that they have been completely wiped from time itself.

Isn't it about time this thread regenerated?

How big bogey bat monsetr ever took over Satellite 5 considering its absolutely rubbish physiology is unclear. Furthermore why not vent the heat int - er -space. Whot is ver ver cold after all.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 9 May 2005 08:44 (twenty years ago)

Depends how close to teh/a sun you are innit, so sometimes a lot of insulation will be required for a space station. But yes, something could have been worked out. Maybe the big blob thing does not have the l33+ engineering sk!llz0r.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 9 May 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)

It was orbiting the Earth = not very close to teh sun.

Was the aliang the bad guy really - killing all those people and controlling the Earth's media to keep them down, or was it the businessman Pegg, in his suit and time, working for banks eh?

Pete (Pete), Monday, 9 May 2005 09:23 (twenty years ago)

There was something Davies said in the Doctor Who Confidential about 'all being revealed' about why the monster was on the space station, I think he implied it was all part of a bigger plot.

Greig (treefell), Monday, 9 May 2005 09:32 (twenty years ago)

There have been aq number of instances of things "not being right" in time. For someone whose history is so good, for instance, he should know the first proper Earth first contact. The victorian stuff "did not seem right" to him.

Time war misplaces stuff in time?

Pete (Pete), Monday, 9 May 2005 09:41 (twenty years ago)

I hate and fear bigger-plot stuff, but only because I hate and fear the possibility that it'll be fun and I still won't like it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 9 May 2005 09:55 (twenty years ago)

This idea of time ripples and misplaces is what I reckon is behind the Bad Wolf rub.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 May 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)

I am using rub in the affectionate sense.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 May 2005 10:05 (twenty years ago)

Doctor Who 2005: The Second Half

Because Pete demanded it.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 9 May 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.