OH FOR FUCKS SAKE: Ontario bans Pit Bulls

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1109692499090_105101699/?hub=CTVNewsAt11

But what will be the Target stores mascot now?

Ontario legislature passes law to ban pit bulls
CTV.ca News Staff
Tue. Mar. 1 2005 11:19 PM ET

The Ontario legislature has voted in favour of legislation banning the pit bull breed of dogs -- an act that some animal rights activists say won't stop attacks.

The bill received its third and final reading at Queen's Park on Monday. It now needs royal assent before being proclaimed into law.

Ontario is the only province to specifically target the breed. Attorney General Michael Bryant said Tuesday he expects other provinces will soon follow.

"I would anticipate that other states and provinces across North America will pursue it when they see that, in fact, in Ontario it got safer with this bill,'' Bryant said of the legislation.

"Mark my words, Ontario will be safer.''

Bryant introduced his legislation in October following several high-profile attacks on humans and other dogs, saying he was convinced the dogs are dangerous and pose a risk to public safety.

The legislation would prohibit breeding pit bulls and future purchases and imports of the dogs.

In order to protect existing pit bulls from a mass cull, a grandfather clause is included in the legislation that would require pit bulls to be muzzled and leashed in public.

As well, the legislation would double the maximum fine to $10,000 for owners of "any dangerous dog" that attacks, and for the first time allows for jail time of up to six months.

During public hearings on the legislation in January, animal rights activists argued that the real problem is irresponsible dog owners, and that banning a specific breed would give the public a false sense of security.

Ontario's New Democrats agree and voted against the legislation Tuesday.

"Experts agree, the pit bull ban won't make Ontario safer," NDP MPP Peter Kormos said in a release.

"Getting tough on irresponsible dog owners and holding them accountable for vicious dog attacks will provide tough, effective and enforceable protection against dog attacks."

Many municipalities across the country have chosen to either ban pit bulls or enact strict restrictions, such as muzzling.

between this and the Washington state bill to hold video game makers liable, Christ...

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:36 (twenty years ago)

it's so 1989 to care about pit bulls

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

Couldn't they have put them in camps or gassed them or something?

Who did release magic family out from the base of $499 (deangulberry), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

Ally OTM.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

http://www.umass.edu/bdic/images/directory/puppythumb.jpg

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)

He's clearly crazed.

Who did release magic family out from the base of $499 (deangulberry), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:49 (twenty years ago)

I don't much care for pitbulls but I do think dealing with the owners would have been the proper way to go.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://pics.hoobly.com/full/U8DD9OZPR1JD.jpg

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Friday, 4 March 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

I don't think Target's mascot is a pit bull. It's a spuds dog right? English something?

Here's a pit bull: http://www.gecoland.it/immagini/tpicukc.jpg

here's the target dog:
http://www.cursor.org/stories/images/dog_2.jpg

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Friday, 4 March 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

the target dog looks like a staffordshire bull terrier.

Ed (dali), Friday, 4 March 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)

http://www.sixquestions.com/upload/target250.gif

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:47 (twenty years ago)

Nope. The Target dog looks more like an English Bull Terrier. The dog above that is a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or pit bull, or Staffy as they're often called by the people who like them.

It's a terrible shame, this, because among the people who look after them and socialise them responsibly, staffies are often known as Nanny Dogs because they love children so much. Yes, they are scary when they're on the attack, and they have incredibly powerful jaws, so where another dog might give you a painful bite, a staffie will take your arm off. And yes, they are strong and can be hard to physically restrain once they get going. But it takes just as much to get them going as it takes to get a friendly old labrador going.

Bloody people.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)

nope, Pit Bull Terriers and Staffordshire Bull Terriers are two different breeds of dog. Staffies are much smaller and more compact. I don't know how to post images, but just do a Google Image Search if you want to see the difference

And the Target dog is indeed an English Bull Terrier.

Seuss, Friday, 4 March 2005 08:31 (twenty years ago)

Pit Bull... TERRIER!

(Come on, some of you guys must have seen Black Cat, White Cat, surely?)

I hate all dogs, to be honest. Walking around with a dog and saying "oh but the chances of it RIPPING YOUR FLESH OPEN AND EATING YOUR HEART are so minimal" is just the same as me walking round with a gun and saying "oh but the chances of me BLOWING YOUR FACE OFF is so minimal, really, yes".

emil.y (emil.y), Friday, 4 March 2005 09:21 (twenty years ago)

The chances of me getting the is/are conundrum wrong appears to be rather, er, maximal, on the other hand. Gah.

emil.y (emil.y), Friday, 4 March 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)

pit bulls are not staffs bulls. I should know. My mum has had a staffs bull terrier for nearly 10 years now.

Ed (dali), Friday, 4 March 2005 09:28 (twenty years ago)

there's a guy in my neighborhood with a rottweiler who he walks without a leash. the dog is super-calm, always by his side, and totally understands every command his owner gives him (i saw him walking his dog just now, in fact - said "good morning" to him). there is no reason to be scared of any breed of dog, just dogs with lousy owners.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah, sorry, my mistake.

We don't really have those dogs much in Ireland. Are they an American breed? A couple of sites seem to refer to them as American Pit Bulls. Interestingly, when I googled for info on pit bulls, one of the first sites I came across said that originally all of the strong terrier types (staffies, English, etc.) were referred to as "pit bulls" because they were all used for pit fighting in much the same way. Maybe my confusion comes from olden times.

I used to live on the same road as a gobshite builder who kept large sums of money in his house. To protect his money he had:

A German Shepherd: A sweet dog who used to play with us in the road. Our favourite game was getting him to jump over us. He also used to play with our King Charles spaniel. Some asshole left down rat poison in a public park and he ate it and died.

A Dobermann: He tried to keep the dog from getting too socialised and used to do stupid things like only feeding it six days a week (in case he had to go to hospital or something, so the dog wouldn't panic?????), but when he had its tail docked and its ears cut (technically not legal here anymore, but still...) one of its ears kind of flopped down and he was ashamed of it. It let burglars into and out of the house one night. End of dog.

A Rottweiler: called Henry. A big slobbery mess who farted a lot and was also insufficiently vicious. After Henry failed to impress a set of burglars one night, the guy got rid of him and gave up on dogs altogether.

It just shows how hard you have to try to make sociable animals antisocial.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Friday, 4 March 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

Its interesting that a bunch of you are tempering this article with the I knew a dog of that breed and it was gentle and washed my dishes stories, but really I don't see it as that big an issue. (Of course, I dislike dogs, so that might offset those of you who love dogs and are upset by this). But let's not forget that some dog owners get certain breeds for reasons that are stooopid. Do I have to cite the stooopid reason why some people want a pit bull? They might be similar to the stooopid reasons why someone might want a pet alligator. Could someone in Ontario own an alligator and take care of it a be a proper owner? Yes. Are alligators banned as pets in Ontario? I think so. Still, let's not turn this into a huge rights issue.

Now can someone do something about that dog across the street that barks ALL FUCKING DAY!!!!

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)

there's a guy in my neighborhood with a rottweiler who he walks without a leash. the dog is super-calm, always by his side, and totally understands every command his owner gives him (i saw him walking his dog just now, in fact - said "good morning" to him). there is no reason to be scared of any breed of dog, just dogs with lousy owners.
Totally otm!
Pitbull
ihttp://dognoses.com/pitbull.jpg
English Bull Terrier
http://www.animalthemes.co.nz/Product%20Graphics/Sawley/Keyrings%20and%20Fridge%20Magnets/026%20-%20English%20Bull%20Terrier%20Br.jpg
Staffordshire Bull Terrier
http://www.thedoghows.com/factory/graphics/dogs/staffordshire%20bull%20ter.JPG

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Friday, 4 March 2005 13:28 (twenty years ago)

Ah well..
American Pitbull Terrier
http://www.rarebreed.com/breeds/pitbull/pitbull.jpg

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Friday, 4 March 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

there is no reason to be scared of any breed of dog, just dogs with lousy owners.

That's true. Dogs that are vicious are usually vicious because of mistreatment on the part of the owner.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)

There is no reason to be scared of any breed of dog?????????????

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

Only pomeranians.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

God loves a terrier
yes he does
God loves a terrier
that's because
brown sturdy bright and true
they give their hearts to you
God didn't miss a stitch
be it dog or be it bitch
when he made the Norwich merrier
with his cute little 'derrier'
yes God loves a terrier!

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

there really is no reason to be scared of a dog simply because of its breed, though. My mom has had every manner of "scary" breed of dog, with the exception of a pit bull, and they have all been as sweet and well mannered as can be. In fact the only type of dog we've ever had that I remember biting me was a goddamn chihuahua.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

some people do want pit bulls for stoopid reasons. such people are likely the ones to be irresponsible with their dogs, or people to try to train their dogs to be vicious. but a lot of people like pit bulls, because they are very often sweet and loving dogs, despite the stereotype. i have seen far too many affectionate and good-natured pit bulls go through the shelter i worked at to ever think ill of the breed. the vicious ones, like vicious dogs of any kind, should very simply be put down, and the owners taken to task for their dogs.

JuliaA (j_bdules), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

There is no reason to be scared of any breed of dog?????????????

i've spent a lot of time around dogs and worked in an animal shelter, and what vicious dogs have in common is not a breed but ownership and/or mistreatment by people.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)


All of the bully breeds are related - bull terriers, American bulldogs (also intimidating, but harmless), you name it. I think the reason the AmStaff exists is because it has a stricter breed standard than the APBT (not shown in dog shows, but a recognized breed), which is a blue-collar urban dog with a lot of other breeds mixed in over the years. That's why APBTs have different features. They're both closely related to the English staffy.

There is an entire magazine devoted to the bully breeds.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

my mom's English Bull Terrier was so weird, it was always so excited whenever I laid down in front of the tv to watch cartoons and would get itself completely worked up, yipping and jumping on me and running frantically in circles around me. The longer I ignored it in favor of Voltron the more worked up it'd get to the point where it VOMITED, on several occasions.

WTF!

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

Dogs that are vicious are usually vicious because of mistreatment on the part of the owner.

yeah, but definitely not always. My mother, while riding her horse out on some open space, got attacked by an off-leash pit bull. The dog jumped up and attached itself via its teeth to the horse's front - it was literally being swung around by its teeth by the horse. At some point, both the dog and my mom got thrown off. Evidently, the owner had never seen any behavior like that from the pit bull ever, and she had never mistreated it. I think the dog's name was Sugar or something ridiculous like that.

I don't want to slam a breed in general, but it seems to me more pit bulls go ridiculously crazy/vicious than other types of dogs.

lemin (lemin), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

That's kind of a terrier thing though, IMO, and not specifically a "pit bull" thing--I've seen Jack Russells do similar jacked up shit and no one would think to label a Jack Russell as vicious, probably because they're so tiny.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

from what i've seen, i'll grant that pit bulls seem more prone to aggression towards other animals.

xpost - that's such a good point.. ppl with kids are advised not to get jr's because they're prone to aggressiveness towards children, and the same goes for other animals in the house.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

I used to have an AmStaff and she was the sweetest thing ever! I'm not just saying that because she was the most gentle and friendly creature to have ever graced the earth, but she was actually, like, serene.
In the summer time I would sometimes take her downtown with me to sit on the patio at a good pub where she could get a nice big bowl of water and sit in the shade while I had a pint. One day, we were sitting there, the two of us, and this middle aged woman walked by with one of those little fashion accessory dogs and the F.A.D saw my gal and went absolutely apeshit. THe F.A.D. was barking and growling and just flipping out and the owner picked it up (in one hand!) and glared at me and said, "Please sir, control your vicious animal!"
The whole time, Bessie had just been sitting there, head slightly cocked in curiosity, never making a sound. She was a beautiful buddha dog.

Huk-L, Friday, 4 March 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

there's also a difference between owners who never mistreat their dogs and ones who can control their dogs to the point of being called good pet owners.

lemin (lemin), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

The fact is that you simply can't deal with all the stupid owners who mistreat their dogs. There will always be an angry dog around. And if it endangers someone's life or leg (want to roll around in a wheelchair for the rest of your life?) because that dog is a pitbull rather than a lab, it is worthwhile to make some kind of restriction on the breed of dog that the public can own. Sure, lions are kind animals if they are raised with love. But you can't efficiently police the owner's behavior of his pet.

57 7th (calstars), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

Yeah but in that case we shouldn't have, like, cars either.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

Sure, lions are kind animals if they are raised with love.

Ah now, come on. You knew you weren't going to get away with that. Lions aren't domestic animals.

Bull terriers do make such lovely summer pub dogs. I met one when drinking outside the Gravediggers in Glasnevin one year, and the dog just kept lying against my leg. Its owner, who was sitting beside me, tried to get it to stop, but after a while I said "look, I like these dogs. It's okay." He was really pleased. He said that she does it all the time, but most people freak out and move away.

I just wish there were more laws that held the owners responsible when their dogs attack people. Didn't someone get tried a few years ago for assault with a deadly weapon when their dogs attacked somebody? I have a vague memory of it...

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

I like dogs in general, but I can't say I'd lose any sleep over pit bulls being banned. They do seem to be usually involved in the most deadly attacks. And the car comparison is just silly, because there are many safer alternatives to pit bulls that perform every function that pit bulls perform, whereas there is no safer alternative to cars.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

It is true that whenever someone gets attacked with a knife in Britain or Ireland I think 'well, at least they didn't have a gun'.

I'm so conflicted!

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

Where is luna? Doesn't she own a pit bull? I think she might argue that there is no alternative to her dog that would perform every function her dog performs for her, as would most people who own and enjoy a specific breed of dog.

As for there being no safer alternative to cars, that is just as equally subjective as the idea that there is an "alternative" to a specific breed of dog. I've never had a drivers' licence in my life. I think there are plenty of viable alternatives to cars. Others who value their car would disagree with me.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

There were a few attacks on children last summer in Toronto and the powers that be overreacted. A few cities already had similar bylaws in place so it wasn't much of a strech for the province to jump in an deflect all the questioning from other issues on to this one.

While I can't argue the logic isn't flawed, I hate dogs so I shouldn't complain too much.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

In California civil law, the owner of a dog which bites a plaintiff is automatically liable (barring extreme circumstances). I would support a law (it may already exist) criminalizing raising or training dogs to be aggressive. That said, there are many pit bulls in my neighborhood and almost all are well-raised and polite to a degree that cannot be said of the human population. Unless otherwise socialized, they are kind and extremely loyal and I am told that when exposed to other dogs in their puppyhood, they are well-disposed to other canines as well. The Ontario law would seem to me an over-reaching, nanny-state intrusion into personal rights which unfairly stigmatizes a breed rather than judging them on a case by case basis. For all those who hate dogs, consider if a self-righteous majority decided unfairly to ban something you cherish for demagogic purposes.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:17 (twenty years ago)

We are a nanny-'state' and proud.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

FWIW I absolutely hate pit bulls because I think they're very, very ugly.

The problem here is not the breed though. There are certain breeds of dogs that because of their intended function they have more aggression factor than, say, a cocker spaniel. But keep in mind that the intended function of a domestic animal is also to coexist with human beings and as such this is not a trait that inherently leads to viciousness. The problem here is that everyone in the world knows which breeds are the ones "meant" for fighting or police work or whatever, so people who are going to be bad owners who want a "badass" dog are inherently more attracted to those breeds (see the story above about the dude with the German Shepherd, Rottweiler, and Pit Bull). If abilities and actions of the minority owners of these breeds were not at fault here and the breed itself was at fault here then, with the approximately 80 trillion PBs, Rotties, GSs, etc in the world that there would be a whole helluva lot more of fatal dog attacks going around?

Some statistics, most recent I could find--note that my quip about worrying about Pit Bulls is so 1989 is not inaccurate: Rottweilers outpace them in the lethality stakes from that point onwards. Also, shockingly, a Cocker Spaniel HAS apparently killed someone.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

http://news.google.com/news?q=chimpanzee+attack

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

i've spent a lot of time around dogs and worked in an animal shelter, and what vicious dogs have in common is not a breed but ownership and/or mistreatment by people
Still, if this happens, I'd be scared of the dog

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

I'm surprised Luna hasn't posted on the thread yet! She must be preparing the escape routes for the poor Ontario critters.

Good friends of mine adopted a pit bull who literally found them, she walked up to friend Kathy on the street. Said pit bull is a total friendly sweetheart who loves kids.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

I don't see why dogs like this can't be treated like guns. Have a criminal record? Ever been charged with abusing an animal? No pit bull for you.

xpost - I've been wondering where Luna is, myself.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)

I don't know why people assume that it's their natural right to walk around with a large, potentially dangerous animal. The whole idea of keeping pets is kind of peculiar in itself. I mean we don't live in the forest any more. If people are so attached to their pit bulls and can't bear the thought of having a different breed of pet, then I think a reasonable compromise would be that pit bulls (or any other breed of dog which correlates as highly with deadly attacks on people) would have to be muzzled in public. There should be fines for not having the dog muzzled in public, and if an unmuzzled pit bull is ever involved in a deadly attack then the owner should be liable for murder charges. If pit bull ownders would prefer that to a ban, then it seems a reasonable alternative.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

Apes, humans share killing impulse

Can a ban on primate reproduction be far behind? WHAT HAVE YOU WROUGHT Ontari-ari-ari-OOOOOOO?

Huk-L, Friday, 4 March 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

Again, what about $1000 fines for the owners of dogs that bark ALL GODDAMNED DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

A place to live a place grow.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

We are a nanny-'state' and proud.

I have nothing against the reasonable interest of the state to regulate the breeding, selling, or possession of animals, or even mandatory training or insurance for owners of a certain breed, but a blanket ban seems demagogic to me. I have heard the shrill voices of those who wish to ban pit bulls and, when they don't sound downright racist, equating pit bull ownership with gangs or ganglike behavior, they sound as if they have never seen the lovely, friendly dogs that I know. The Irish couple who own a pub 'round the corner from me have a beautiful bitch named Mary who has endured for years the iniquity of being in a household of small children who have wrestled with her, pulled her ears, and all the small cruelties one expects of small children, and though she will look at you with those heart-rending, canine eyes that say, "What have I ever done to deserve this? Can you not restrain the little brats?", she has never so much as even nipped them. Unless these dogs are trained to be violent or not properly socialized, they need not be violent. One could say the same for people really, couldn't one? Should we ban people since they are responsible for the vast majority of homicides?

Thermo, OTM

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

I don't see why dogs like this can't be treated like guns. Have a criminal record? Ever been charged with abusing an animal? No pit bull for you.

The Humane society downtown are already bonkers enough, don't give them more ideas.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

I have virtually no experience with Pit Bulls, so I'm going to base the following statement on my very extensive experience with the two other most lethal brand of dogs, the Rottweiler and the German Shepherd. These dogs can be dangerous, extremely dangerous--that's part of what their breed is meant to do. But the thing is, a lot of their apparently vicious behavior is kind of like a game to the dog, and a properly trained dog can be told to start and stop at the owner's will.

So, for example, my parents own the hugest German Shepherd I have ever seen. The dog's head must weigh 20 lbs on its own. If you saw the animal playing with my dad, you'd be terrified of it, the growling, the relentlessness; I've seen the dog tear apart a soccer ball in under a minute flat. It is actually from Germany, Schutzhund trained and was a police force dog. All anyone in the family has to do, however, if the dog is getting too wound up, is to say "NEIN" at it and it looks at you and completely stops. Then you say "PLOTZ" and it sits quietly until you invite it over again.

In short, banning a breed isn't what I think people should do because good owners will now not have the breed and bad owners will still go ahead and get it cos what the hell do they care? Pets should require licencing--if the potential owner cannot prove it can handle the animal the person should not be allowed to have the animal. I don't understand why it makes more sense to ban an entire breed, the vast majority of which are fine, well handled and trained animals well loved by their owners, than it does to require people to go through training with their dogs.

xpost yeah I see nothing wrong with requiring muzzles and leashes in public.

(FWIW the reason why my parents have the German police dog is because the police chief in the German town decided the dog was "too silly" for German police and gave it back to the breeder because the officers were playing with the dog too much, which is like the funniest thing)

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

"ACH! NEIN! DIESER HUND MACHT UNS LAECHERLICH! AUS!"

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

There are laws against violent humans, despite the fact that many of them might want to blame their upbringing for their violent behaviour.

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

xpost Hahahah, that's beautiful. Hooray for silly dogs!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

Yeah there are laws against violent humans. So I don't understand why a law against the violent human in this circumstance is wrong.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)

MEIN GOTT ZU BOESE! ZU LAECHERLICH!

http://www.columbia.edu/~alk2102/images/silly.jpg

(there is a third one, not pictured, in the house as well)

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Aw, beasties.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

I love German Shepherds.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

They're so cute! I love teh doggies.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

i can't help but think that there is at least some degree of stereotype in all of this - the idea of the debased mongrel pit bull and a similarly dim view of owners. chows, akitas, and german shepherds are all large breed dogs with the potential to be highly aggressive and indeed are often bred for attack purposes. why is no one calling for stricter controls on pure breeds?

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

From Pit Bulls: What's the appeal?:

Searched the web for "rottweiler attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 319

Searched the web for "Doberman attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 492

Searched the web for "german shepherd attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 141

Searched the web for "pitbull attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 478

Searched the web for "poodle attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 31

Your search - "chow-chow attack" - did not match any documents.

Searched the web for "pit-bull attack". 
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,900

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

I believe in responsible dog ownership, no matter what the breed is. People need to be aware that certain breeds have certain ticks that need to be considered, for instance my best friend had a Kuvasz that sadly died last year, he was a great dog, but Kuvasz been bred for centuries as a guard dogs. Therefore when my friend's uncle jokingly went for her throat one day, of course Alex was going to attack him. Not because he's an uncontrollable or vicious creature, but because it's in his nature. Their family spent a lot of time and money on disciplining him, but they knew that's what they were getting into with that breed, esp. since his sire was put down for being "aggressive" and the breeder failed to tell them this until later. He just offered to have Alex destroyed and replaced with a "better dog." Ugh.
x-post I think most of the chows/akitas/shibas I have met are much more temperamental than bull breeds/shepherds

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

i think this got discussed into the ground on the other thread, but how many of the documents relating to pit-bull attack do you suppose are discussing the same high-profile incidents or discussing the issue as we are on this board?

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)

Google is more reliable than actual CDC statistics, you're correct.

xpost

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)

fwiw, i was attacked by a chow. and now that i'm thinking about it, a neighbor's cocker spaniel bit me several decades ago. that fucker was MEAN, and eventually had to be put down.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)

chows/akitas/shibas

Don't know shibas but the chows and akitas I've known were more stand-offish.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

I know it's not the most scientific approach out there. I just posted it because I thought it was interesting.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

x-post I think most of the chows/akitas/shibas I have met are much more temperamental than bull breeds/shepherds

My sister is studying to be a vet tech and works in a vet's office, and the only dogs she is wary of working on are chows and akitas because they have been a bit more unpredictable in terms of temperment. I think the bull breeds/rottweilers/sheperds etc. get an unfair bad rap in this department.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

i think the google thing is interesting in that it offers a good example of media hysteria. it's like the child kidnap mania also of the early/mid-80s. i lived in fear of being snatched by a perv and dismembered like adam walsh if i strayed from my parents at the mall, and of being gobbled by a frenzied canine killing machine if i played outside.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

our condo was always full of huge, vicious dogs like dobermans and rotts and german shepherds and jack russells when i was little so i never underrstood why all the kids were so scared of dogs!

one of the boys in our complex thought our bull terrier was a camel, i swear to god. nyers.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

the world just needs more hound dogs.

http://www.detnews.com/pix/2000/05/09/d04dogs.gif

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

there's another potentially dangerous breed! my mother's friend threw her back out carrying one of hers after it was enfeebled by arthritis.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

We need a thread for adorable dog pictures.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Rather than tossing around anecdotal stories of the occasional dog we've met who was nice or mean, it might be helpful to look at actual statistics compiled by researchers who have studied the issue. The CDC report that Ally linked to above is very informative on this topic. I quote:

"Despite these limitations and concerns, the data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities."

DBRF stands for dog-bite related fatalities. So if people want to maintain that it's just the owners and not the breed, they can - but the facts don't support their case.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

http://www.duiops.net/cine/images/gattaca.jpg

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

That CDC report is about a SYNDROME, it does not address CAUSES. It should not be used to make policy decisions, or even personal ethical decisions, as if it points to a direct correlation between BEING BORN A PIT BULL -> SKINNER BOX -> GUILTY AS SIN. That's simply not something we have the ability to prove, and while I will concede that legislators must always be forced to try and make grey areas into black and white ones in ways that are in the best interests of the population, I don't think it makes one lick of sense to ban a "breed" of DOG as if that's going to produce significantly more good than harm.

Pit Bulls :: Ontario : Droopy Draws :: Virginia

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

Well, there are difficulties with banning a breed of dog, as the CDC report also mentions. For example, it's not always a simple matter to determine the breed of a dog. But I don't see why banning a breed of dog as pets is any different than banning certain kinds of animals as pets. No one is clamoring for the rights of people to own alligators or saber-toothed tigers or whatever as pets.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

"Despite these limitations and concerns, the data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities."

Pitbulls, rottweilers, akitas, etc... may have a greater capacity to be fatal to humans but that capacity is not likely to be realized without human training and encouragement. People who want intimidating dogs are unlikely, sure, to buy a golden lab or a teacup poodle, but I don't see that that makes the pitbull et al really breed specific problems. Take away their dogs and they'll find something else to intimidate you with, and though they may not show up in the DBRF categories, those fatalities may still take place by other means.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

The facts you quoted don't support either case because AS I HAVE PREVIOUSLY STATED those breeds of dogs are MORE LIKELY to be purchased by PSYCHOPATHS WHO ARE TRYING TO CREATE VICIOUS ANIMALS because of certain inborn abilities in dogs whose "work" purpose is specifically to protect, attack, guard, fight, or herd. Hence why it makes sense to SCREEN OWNERS BETTER AND LICENCE THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF DOGS.

or what Michael basically said.

Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyzay), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm not so sure that the fatal capacity of pit bulls has to be specifically encouraged by people in order to result in a fatality. I'd like to see some evidence of that before agreeing to it. In any case, it's also true that guns don't kill people unless someone points one and pulls the trigger, but that's not a good argument against gun control either.

xpost

o. nate (onate), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

Come on, pit bulls kill more than any other dog because they have the ability to kick ass if not trained properly.

There may be some dogs *within* a breed who are bred for aggression, but that doesn't mean the entire breed is aggressive by nature.

Some other things to keep in mind: dogs that attack people are often misreported as 'pit bulls' when they are no such thing. Another thing to keep in mind is that many, many APBTs have bits of other breeds in them - you can see this when you look at pictures of them (some are smaller and skinnier, some more muscular ; ears are shaped differently, etc.)

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)


Make that 'socialized' instead of 'trained'.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

Can we all agree that semi-automatic and automatic and sawed-off pitbulls should be outlawed?

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

You can take my sawed-off pitbull away from me when you pry it off my cold, dead leg.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

I'm keepin' my big fuckin' mouth shut on this thread.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

Where is luna? Doesn't she own a pit bull? I think she might argue that there is no alternative to her dog that would perform every function her dog performs for her, as would most people who own and enjoy a specific breed of dog.

I figured I'd said everything I had to say about pits - yeah, I do have two of them, and they really are sweet and loving dogs. This may be because I made damn sure when I got them to train them carefully and properly, and because of this, I doubt I'll ever have a problem. They play well with people and other dogs.

I understand why people don't care for them and/or are afraid of them, but I'd venture to guess that a percentage of those people have had little or no personal experience with the dogs themselves. Not all, of course, but a percentage. I'm aware of all the pros and cons, and I made my decision accordingly. I love my dogs, they have become a fantastic addition to my home and family. I have never personally experienced a mean pit, but they do exist, and I know there are people who think I am a bad parent because I allow my son to play with my dogs. So be it.

My son fears for his life: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/zeroboo.jpg

His father's face being eaten off: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/zerokisses.jpg

Two clearly insane animals: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/sleepy.jpg

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

(I apologize for the crappy camera phone pictures)

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)


My sister's pit freaks out around some small animals. He has to be kept away from cats. The other night, I was walking him, and he became agitated when he saw a cat. I sat him down and put my arms around him, and realized that he was shaking. He wasn't so much angry as scared.

He was rescued from the clutches of someone who runs dogfights, and they were 'training' him using small animals like cats, so no wonder he doesn't like them.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

Where's their faces? Just post more of them, plz.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

What really needs to get banned is the vicious the foot bitey beast. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.


Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)

Stop teasing us with the biscuit you bitch: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/hounds.jpg

Do you have food in there? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/zoe.jpg

Dogs hate camera flashes: ihttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/ze

Those are all I have here.

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

oops http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v240/lunacee/zero.jpg

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

I understand why people don't care for them and/or are afraid of them, but I'd venture to guess that a percentage of those people have had little or no personal experience with the dogs themselves

That's me. And I know this banning is a simplistic "solution" to a more complex issue. I'm just wondering how many pet owners would welcome more government licensing and regulations to help ensure that pet owners act responsibly, not only to the public, but the pets as well. Seriously, this dog barking across the street often sounds like its crying. A call to the authorities is not taking seriously and talking to the neighbours leads to us being told to mind our own business. And a dog bite is way more serious.

Sure, lets make pet owners more responsible.

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

I think that our calls aren't taken seriously because they're (the city and the humane society) are swamped (that is what they say). If this is the case, then that might suggest that irresponsible pet owners are a bigger problem than any of us would like.

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Um, Luna, what's hanging from Zero's mouth? It looks like a fang with gore on it. P.S. cutest floppy ears ever.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

I'm just wondering how many pet owners would welcome more government licensing and regulations to help ensure that pet owners act responsibly, not only to the public, but the pets as well.

Personally, I'd have no problem with it whatsoever. You have a pet, you're responsible for it and it's actions - same as if you have a kid.

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

This is a pic of Mack:

http://homepage.mac.com/dymaxia/.Pictures/Mack2.jpg

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

haha - it's nothing Jeanne - it's just a weird shadow from his lip that matches up with his dog tag/license, which are hanging sideways under his chin. You can see the shadow of them on his chest.

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

Yr3k, he's adorable.

luna (luna.c), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

Here's another, with me:

http://homepage.mac.com/dymaxia/.Pictures/MackKerry.jpg

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

Okay, that's the greatest. HE'S SMILING.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

What a cutie!

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)


He loooovves the camera.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)

Was Mack adopted or adopted you, Yr3k?

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

I think that the only allowable breed should be Shih-Tzus because eventually when we make ourselves extinct, they will pick up the pieces or our civilization that lies in ruin and become a tribal collective and live in redwood forests and hunt with spears!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Plus it's just fun to say their name.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

Spencer: an animal collective, you mean?

*is brutally killed*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

They will no longer be "animale"!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)

It is actually from Germany, Schutzhund trained and was a police force dog.

haha! My Dad trained our first dog to Schutzhund III.

Putting sweaters on dogs is what should be outlawed. Hrumph.

bnw (bnw), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

http://images.urbandictionary.com/view/large/15863.jpg
Proof that pit bulls are actually Pwned by cats!

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

there should be a video game franchise based on that picture

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha, oh man.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)


Putting sweaters on dogs is what should be outlawed. Hrumph.

Yeah, my sister put that on him, because he has so little fur, and he was getting cold. It made him break out in a rash, though, so he doesn't wear it anymore.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

Our dog has a little coat we put on him when we walk him because he has almost no fur, either. What else can you do in the winter?

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

Yr3k, it looks like the sweater is wool. Maybe he'd do better with cotton or fleece. Wool is very itchy.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)


Yeah, it doesn't matter anyway, because he tears off anything we put on him. He prefers to go commando even on the coldest days.

Yr3k (dymaxia), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

there should be a video game franchise based on that picture

What sort of franchise would be based on this?

http://www.ajmalbeig.addr.com/images/dog-n-cat.jpg

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)

Now I see where this thread is going...

peepee (peepee), Friday, 4 March 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

A brand of ice cream

TOMBOT, Friday, 4 March 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

Condoms.

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 4 March 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

Just to Balance Things Out -- Where My Dogz At? Picture Thread

kingfish, Friday, 4 March 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

I really dislike dogs and I think this ruling is insane.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

http://img39.exs.cx/img39/4384/photo10te.jpg

yaydrian (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Friday, 4 March 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)

o. nate, can't you see the faulty logic behind your "pitbulls account for 65% of all bite incidents, yet don't constitute 65% of the dog population, therefore they are a vicious, human-biting breed"?

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

someone was comparing needing a certain dog to needing a car, in general. a better comparison is with needing a *certain* type of car, such as a exotic sports car. aren't they more likely to be used illegally (just like pitbulls are)? isn't there a safer alternative? shouldn't cars above a certain hp (or power/weight ratio) be banned?

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)

or should we, i don't know, punish the drivers instead of the cars? sure, there will always be some people out there who will use the inherent power of an exotic sports car for evil instead of good, but shit happens, morons will always exist. no amount of legislation will change that.

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)

well this news story sorta ruins the whole 'people can't own tigers and whatnot' argument

hstencil (hstencil), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)

10 to 20K large cats as pets in the US! where's the outcry, ILX?

hstencil (hstencil), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I saw something on 60 minutes about big cats, but, again, they are regulated more closely than pit bulls.

Michael White (Hereward), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:20 (twenty years ago)

well there are obv. more pit bulls.

hstencil (hstencil), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:21 (twenty years ago)

The Denver ordinance makes no distinction between any of these breeds. If if even looks like a pitbull its banned. They put down a guy's 35 pound English Staffordshire. The State Legislature passed a law last year that makes owners more liable for their dogs because of a few high profile attacks but at the same time did away with breed specific bans. It seemed like a sensible solution but since we're a home rule State the local ordinance takes precedence.

http://library6.municode.com/gateway.dll/CO/colorado/341?f=templates&fn=default.htm&npusername=10257&nppassword=MCC&npac_credentialspresent=true&vid=default

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)

I will say that I'm not against these animals individually - I love dogs and know people with really sweet pit bulls and rottweilers etc, but they do cause fear in many people. If you want one, please think about that fact - that your dog does create a climate of fear for some people. If you don't care about that, then fine, do whatever it is you're going to do. I'm not sure how I feel about the ban.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 5 March 2005 00:58 (twenty years ago)

So let me get this straight. Punish the owner, but only AFTER an attack. That does comfort me too much.

The above comparison to different types of cars is not really the same because in our society the owners and drivers of cars are much more regulated, observed and punished than pet owners.

peepee (peepee), Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)

if you are of a certain age, you were taught to fear doberman pinschers in the mid 80s...

Kingfish MuffMiner 2049er (Kingfish), Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:21 (twenty years ago)

what then, punish them BEFORE the attack? the world is an imperfect place. you can't prevent all bad things from happening. well, you can, but I think we can all agree that a world structured to make that happen would suck much dick and would not be worth it.
regulate, observe (whatever that means) and punish pet owners like we do drivers. fine. no one here has said we shouldn't.

()ops (()()ps), Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)

By "observe", I meant that the police observe the drivers in action. Thats difficult to do with pets. Everyone knows that if the government proposed that they test, and license every pet owner, many pet owners would howl about the infringement (and cost). It seems that the humane society's resources are spread pretty thin (they are were I live). I know that all of you decent and loving pet owners cringe at the thought (and reality) of people who abuse their pets. I'm not sure that I'm for a ban, its just that addressing the problem in a more complicated manner doesn't seem too likely with a/ the current climate of government cuts and b/ the constituents who place a high priority on this issue are a small minority.

peepee (peepee), Saturday, 5 March 2005 02:12 (twenty years ago)

(Somebody asked upthread re: Shiba Inus.

Here's an adorable Shiba pup:

http://www.furrycritter.com/resources/dogs/images/Shiba-Inu.jpg

And the adult version:

http://www.dogbiz.com/dogs-grp6/shiba-inu/images/shiba-280x235-tig-128.gif

They're an amazing breed, I have one and a half Shibas, but they are "different" and ought not to be encouraged in their domineering ways from an early age.)

David A. (Davant), Saturday, 5 March 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I saw something on 60 minutes about big cats, but, again, they are regulated more closely than pit bulls.

Can I just point out again that one of the very obvious differences between pit bulls and large cats are that pit bulls are dogs, domesticated by people for thousands of years? While large cats are not domesticated at all?

Anyway, I think people should just hijack this thread to talk about their dogs.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 5 March 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

This supposed domestication will provide very cold comfort to people whose children or lovers or friends, etc... have been killed by a badly socialized dog.

I remember some sleazy Milanese playboy, several days after a foggy, cold New Years Day boozily bringing his tiger cub into a bar where it seriously unnerved the dogs the little old men and ladies were wont to take with them for a small walk (for the dog) and a coffee or drink (for the human). The admittedly adorable cub had no skill or knowledge in keeping back its claws and so desperately wanted to play with whomever but was so clumsily overpowering that it soon became an unfortunate outcast. I took pity on it despite (or perhaps because) of its unworthy owner but couldn't cuddle or play with it since, as a 40 lbs kitten, it was a dangerous (scratchy, bitey) ingenu.

Michael White (Hereward), Saturday, 5 March 2005 08:20 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to agree that the breed of dog matters a lot less than that particular dog's temperament, but the fact is that some breeds of dog have a lot more capacity for violence. If a poodle or shih tzu or whatever decided to flip out, it probably wouldn't do that much damage. Pit bulls, on the other hand, were bred for generations to be vicious killing machines. The dog can't help what it is, but... in any case, banning all pit bulls is stupid. If they start banning dogs that can be trained to be well-behaved, why don't they just ban all stupid pet choices first i.e. non-domesticated animals.

My parents have had both a rottweiler and a doberman/german shepherd mix. Very friendly, adorable dogs.

mike h. (mike h.), Saturday, 5 March 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

a large standard poodle can do plenty of damage!

hstencil (hstencil), Saturday, 5 March 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

Pit bulls, on the other hand, were bred for generations to be vicious killing machines.

Oh please. At the least, that's a pretty slanted, hyperbolic statement. I mean, my tabby cat, his ancestors were bred for generations to be vicious killing machines. Pit bulls were never bred to attack humans.

That sly smile, those determined eyes, that unwaning pleasure to please... the mere quality and characteristics of the APBT have evoked more human emotional, rational, and irrational response than any other breed that exists today. By no means are these dogs people-haters or people-eaters. Their natural aggressive tendencies are toward other dogs and animals, not people. However if they are properly socialized they will not even be aggressive with them. These are truly quality companions for quality owners only! The American Pit Bull Terrier is a good-natured, amusing, extremely loyal and affectionate family pet, which is good with children and adults. Almost always obedient, it is always eager to please its master. It is an extremely courageous and intelligent guard dog that is very full of vitality. Highly protective of his owners and the owner's property, it will fight an enemy to the death. It is usually very friendly, but has an uncanny ability to know when it needs to protect and when everything is okay. The American Pit Bull Terrier can be willful and needs a firm hand. They are generally okay with other pets if they are raised with them from puppy hood. For the most part they are very friendly, but not recommended for most people. Excellent with children in the family, they have a high pain tolerance and will happily put up with rough child play. As with any breed, they should not be left alone with unfamiliar children. Originally used as fighting dogs, the powerful American Pit Bull may go for the throat of strange dogs. A minimum of training will produce a tranquil, obedient dog. Socialize very thoroughly when young to combat aggressive tendencies and be sure to keep the dog under control when other dogs are present. It has given outstanding results as a guardian of property, but is at the same time esteemed as a companion dog. When properly trained and socialized, this is a very good dog and a great family companion. Unfortunately, some choose to promote the fighting instinct in the breed, giving it a bad name.

()ops (()()ps), Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)

n America, the Pit Bull flourished. It was one of the most popular breeds, highly prized by a wide variety of people. The Pit Bull was used to represent the US in WW1 artwork; popular companies like RCA and the Buster Brown Shoe Company used the breed as their mascots. A Pit Bull named Petie starred in the popular children's television series, Our Gang; a Pit Bull mix named Stubby became a decorated WW1 hero. Pit Bulls accompanied pioneer familes on their explorations. Laura Ingalls Wilder of the popular Little House books owned a working Pit Bulldog named Jack. Famous individuals like Theodore Roosevelt and Helen Keller owned the breed. It was during this time that the Pit Bull truly became America?s sweetheart breed, admired, respected and loved.

()ops (()()ps), Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

shiba inus are pretty much the greatest ever :[[[[

http://img138.exs.cx/img138/3558/shiba9jj.jpg

yaydrian (PUNXSUTAWNEY PENIS), Sunday, 6 March 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

I think Shiba Inus should hijack this thread!

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 6 March 2005 06:12 (twenty years ago)

Actually, on topic, I have a friend whose father raised fighting/guard dog type breeds (Rottie, Shepherds, Dobies and Pit Bulls). They were all impeccably trained and impeccably well-behaved. Then one day some kid's puppy (indeterminate small breed) got under the fence, and the Pit Bull basically ate it in two bites. It was, naturally, really traumatic for everyone, and this guy stopped breeding and raising pits after that incident.

Of course, this is just one anecdotal story, but this experienced dog breeder has sworn ever since that there's something inherent to the American Pit Bull Terrier which predisposes it to sudden, devastating violence.

Even despite this, my instincts tell me that banning a sinlge breed doesn't really address the problem here. I mean, where will it end?

See, for instance:

ihttp://www.arba.org/images/Presa%20Canario.JPG

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 6 March 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)

"indeterminate small breed" = the puppy, not the kid!

David A. (Davant), Sunday, 6 March 2005 06:22 (twenty years ago)

I couldn't get on a bus last week because two 10 year old boys were getting on with a Rottweiler they obviously could barely control. I can't belive the bus driver let them on.

I have been scared of Rottweilers and Pit Bulls because of when my childhood friend was attacked by the Rottweiler from across the street, when my college roomate brought her Rottweiler to visit and it lunged and barked at me, and when some twat brought his Pit Bull on the bus and it lunged and barked at me.

I made the point on the other thread that lots of breeds are known to have some wierd flaws. English Cocker Spaniels can have some sort of RAGE syndrome and responsible breeders are trying to keep this from being inherited by not letting the affected dogs or their near relations breed. Because of the popularity of Pit Bulls with irresponsible dog owners, the dogs w/ bad traits are not being kept from breeding, and are probably encouraged to breed.

marianna, Sunday, 6 March 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

ive seen longhair chihuahuas nastier than pit bulls. perhaps they should have a law that requires pit bull owners to take their dogs to obedience classes, learn how to treat their animals with respect, instead of attempting to ban an entire breed. what next, banning jews?

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Sunday, 6 March 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

concept of making Canada even 'safer' >>> head exploding

dave q (listerine), Sunday, 6 March 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

shiba inus are pretty much the greatest ever

Last year I was working at a place where the director every so often would bring in Suki, her Shiba Inu. The only thing Suki ever endangered was your lunch, if you were forgetful enough to leave it within her reach.

j.lu (j.lu), Sunday, 6 March 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)

maria, wtf!

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 7 March 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)

the only type of dogs i'm scared of are those that are part wolf. the differences between 100% domesticated and not is far greater than differences between any two breeds.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 7 March 2005 07:35 (twenty years ago)

Some of the students I work with have pitbulls, and to hear them talk about them, they seem to have them for the scaringtheshitouttapeopple reason. But they also suggest that the people who breed and sell them don't care who gets them as long as they get the wad of bills.
Its more than a bit misleading for me to mention neglecting owners, and most of the good owners of this board to mention how wonderful this or that pitbull is. Some of you who are foaming at the mouth (I couldn't resist) about the ban have offered blanket statements as to what should happen instead of a ban, but no one has really suggested how it would be done, and who would do it. Or to quote myself from upthread

addressing the problem in a more complicated manner doesn't seem too likely with a/ the current climate of government cuts and b/ the constituents who place a high priority on this issue being a small minority

peepee (peepee), Monday, 7 March 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)

well it's not like banning a whole breed is a very logical, easy-to-implement "solution".
my friend's mom works for a humane shelter. i was surprised today to hear her say how their neighbor's, who are getting a cat from her, couldn't get it quite yet because one of the people who live with them hasn't been interviewed yet. Of course, this precaution is done to prevent any harm coming to the pet, but I think similar measures could be taken to (attempt to) prevent any harm done by a pet. Still, no matter what restrictions you put in place---whether it's on owners or kennels/breeders/sellers, there will always be those who work around or disregard them completely. Any 'hard-stance' legal restrictions will mostly just make people feel like something is being done.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 7 March 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)

Then one day some kid's puppy (indeterminate small breed) got under the fence, and the Pit Bull basically ate it in two bites... this experienced dog breeder has sworn ever since that there's something inherent to the American Pit Bull Terrier which predisposes it to sudden, devastating violence

that's horrible. but did the breeder make any connection between his dog killing an unfamiliar animal that intruded on its property and the fact that he was training it as a guard/attack dog?

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 7 March 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)

four months pass...
i can't tell which is more heartbreaking: this story, or its accompanying photo:

http://sg.yimg.com/xp/ap/20050721/1047141282.jpgDenver Pit Bull Owners in a Panic Over Ban

Thursday July 21, 3:37 AM
Denver Pit Bull Owners in a Panic Over Ban

A few weeks ago, two police cars and two animal control vehicles pulled up at the home of Stef'ny Steffan looking for her beloved 4-year-old pit bull, Xena. Seven officers hauled the animal off to the city shelter, putting her on death row.

Xena became an outlaw after Denver won a court fight and reinstated one of the toughest pit-bull bans in the nation. Since May, more than 380 dogs have been impounded and at least 260 destroyed _ an average of more than three a day.

Dog owners are in a panic. Some are using an underground railroad of sorts, sending their pets to live elsewhere or hiding them from authorities. City officials would not estimate how many people might be violating the ordinance.

Some owners, like Steffan, have won a reprieve for their pets with help from a rescue group. The group got Xena released by signing an affidavit stating that the animal would never return to Denver. The group took the dog to Mariah's Promise in Divide, an animal sanctuary that has accepted more than three dozen pit bulls from Denver....

kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago)

thats awful:-(

latebloomer: lazy r people (latebloomer), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:46 (nineteen years ago)

Now Aurora may ban them as well.

Rotgutt (Rotgutt), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

Woman bites dog, needs rabies shot.

just a reminder: i still hate these dogs.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 3 April 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.