― Qwest22, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevo, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gale Deslongchamps, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― stuart, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
When was the last time you saw a fat mujihadin, eh?
This thinking seems to be the only kind that can actually motivate me to get off my fat arse and get some exercise, though I am aware it is somewhat extremist. My views have been polarising of late - I think I need a woman.
― ogden, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― helen fordsdale, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But anyone can sit here (me included) and say "I've no problem with fat girls", it doesn't say much, its just confirming you don't have prejudices regarding the IDEA of "fat girls". In practice things are different, often physical attraction is all we have to go on, and I'd have doubts about people saying they are more physically attracted or perhaps even equally physically attracted to "fat girls". Perhaps I'm overly cynical. Physical attraction is by its nature pretty shallow, unlike er....proper attraction which is often inexplicable.
I might have mocked earlier but I was always going to be tempted into posting onto this thread.
Damn well better not, or I'll dump you in the Liffey. I'm looking out for your best interests, see. ;-)
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
It seems to be willfully ignorant or disengenous to claim that it's only white people.
― Nic, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bnw, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Sunday, 9 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
No, I would say it's more of an appreciation of big butts or breasts - - genuinely big all over women are not accepted. Take a look at hiphop videos, what kind of women are being objectified there?
― toraneko, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bnw, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Physical attraction and other attraction are different, sure, but, um...why would you doubt this? All other things being equal, I am more physically attracted to "fat girls" (up to a point). This isn't me being PC, as in practise it means I objectify, ogle, and generally get all Shaggy-esque about them. Even on "average" girls, I tend to look for traces of chunkiness. I'm sure there are all sorts of socially conditioned reasons why I do this but the reaction is there, ingrained, and pretty much unshakeable by now.
What a way to start the week's posting.
― Tom, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
"This isn't me being PC"
Now theres an avenue we DONT want to go down.
― Ronan, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gale Deslongchamps, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
However, I find rolls of fat by and largely unappealing. So shoot me.
― Mark C, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Why would blokes not be inclined to ask a tall lass out then? Maybe it comes down to punching your own weight - it's extremely unlikely I'd ask a drop-dead gorgeous lass out on the simple grounds that I'd perceive her as being well out of my league...?
― ogden, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Frankly, I think some boys will be glad to read this kind of thing, because they must think similar thoughts themselves. What is it that makes many boys able to treat women this way, when I'm sure many of the same people wouldn't be racist to anything like the corresponding degree? It isn't like talking about boys' attractiveness, because I'm sure that plastic surgery statistics, media images and personal experience will leave most people with little doubt that the trope of beauty is used against women in a way that it isn't against men.
― maryann, Monday, 10 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ally, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― toraneko, Tuesday, 11 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― maryann, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― di, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Your comments seem to imply that attraction itself equals oppression, or at least that any generalised expression of attraction is oppressive.
― Tom, Wednesday, 12 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i'm not maryann but: because a lot of men do. there are an awful lot of men that i've met who work from the principal of "if i don't wannna fuck her i don't wanna know her". and guess what? these guys tend to only want to fuck girls who are conventionally attractive. i know it may be different here on ILE, i'd like to think that some of the men here are a bit more openminded than that, but that doesn't detract from the fact that there are a shitload of dumb people in the world who do not even think to question themselves and societal conventions. there is a normalisation of male desire that goes on, some people manage to slip throught the cracks (bless their souls) but a lot don't.
i don't think maryann was saying that attraction is inherently oppressive. just the judgements men make on women's bodies seems cruel, especially in a context where certain types of female bodies are valorised and others deemed worthless and ugly, contributing to the whole lookist thing. and some men do make these judgments, and they make them as if the whole of womanhood should immediately morph into what they want.
― di, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm not Maryann either, for which she should be thankful, and I know I'm biased but I don't know, Tom, I must say that I am annoyed by the way people - primarily but not only men, and including people I think of as intelligent and reasonable - often criticise the appearance of women on television (including when they first appear before they've said or done anything and when it just isn't relevant to why they're on tv) in a way that I think would seem completely irrelevant and bizarre if they did it of a man. And when an unattractive woman manages to be successful, which I have a suspicion may well be harder than for a similarly unattractive man, she'll normally get a very tough time from the media whether or not her looks impact on her job choice, which they very rarely would except for this respect issue.
By way of (possibly bad) example, of course I don't agree with her politics at all, but I'd find it very hard to believe that the reason Ann Widdecombe is the most hated and ridiculed MP around is solely based on her politics as opposed to her appearance. Yes, I too find I disagree with most of her speeches, but aren't there plenty of male MPs with beliefs at least as strange and questionable? Why single her out? Why is most of the criticism I hear of her closer to "ha ha, what a mingbeast, wouldn't want to fuck her!" than a political analysis, which I just don't think applies anything like as much to criticism of male politicians?
And I don't think it's just people in the public eye, either. Maybe not so much completely unprovoked, but if someone male did something to annoy someone else I think the odds of that someone else just saying "bastard" as opposed to "jeez, fat old minger, eh?" are considerably higher than them saying "bitch" and not "fat old trout" if the first person was female. (See, I couldn't even think of a male equivalent to "trout"...) Maybe it's only a matter of grabbing for the first convenient insult when you actually have a problem with everything about them, but why do the first insults that come to mind seem to be more likely to be appearance-based when the target is a woman than otherwise?
OK, this is really inarticulate and I went on for far too long, I'm sorry, I don't make much sense at the best of times and I need sleep. I expect when I awake I'll have offended everyone and everyone will have ripped huge great holes in my argument, but go for it (erm, gently), I'd *like* to be proven wrong.
― Rebecca, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bnw, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Tom's points are more useful in pointing up the range of cross- cutting relationships in different spheres between genders. Nor would I say that attraction is somehow intrinsically oppressive. But like every time the problem of objectification comes up on ILE, no- one seems to be able to make a distinction between the gaze of an individual man, and the multiplied, desomatised 'gaze', mediated and fractured, of men represented through cultural structures. Whether individual men choose to dissociate themselves from this or not (and like Di, I see that loads of men here think about this stuff and find ways of dealing with it; also who are very articulate about the double-edged nature of the problems of 'gender' which I might'n't have bothered to think so much about if they weren't so persuasive) they are nonetheless positioned largely in relation to a culture of (active) *looking*, whilst women are still, I would argue, stuck with being largely (passively) *looked at*. Feminism has never argued that no woman wants to be looked at ever, desired ever: just that most women most of the time don't want to be simply objects through which men define their sexuality.
ARen't I in a pissy mood this morning? Maybe I should go revive the Shaggy thread so that I can be pissy even more.
PS: REbecca, spot on about Widdecombe. I've made this point so often that people think I LUV her.
― Ellie, Thursday, 13 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― someone or other (dog latin), Friday, 15 August 2003 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 15 August 2003 01:30 (twenty-one years ago)
it's next to impossible to shut me up about it!
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:47 (twenty-one years ago)
of course not, they don't need validation, but they do need to realise that there are people who want them *just as they are*
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Why are fat girls always so frisky?But you can't go touch 'em cos it's far to risky
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 15 August 2003 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)
The media image of beauty (Lara Flynn Boyle?) and unhealthily 'fat' girls are usually equally unattractive in my camp.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Who would be the exemplification of the popular beauty image? Gwyneth Paltrow?
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)
If skinny is the media image of beauty that should translate across race.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)
To me, "big" is of the proportions of say, umm.... that other woman from the Practice whose name escapes me. I dont think she's "obese" at all, shes just what I'd class as large (as opposed to horribly thin). I dont like to use the word "fat", it has so many negative connotations.
(In case anyone's wondering, I'm quite on the petite side myself).
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)
It would, yes, if there were anything other than white girls depicted.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Goodness, milo. That seems pretty hard to miss. You just said that all the gilrs in ads are skinny. By default, that means we're supposed to think they're beautiful.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― eat meat drink booze smoke drugs tap that ass!!! (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
I am not a moron, you daft fucking hippy.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)
(shit that reminds me! i forgot to get that StE LP!! there's a task for the weekend < /irrelevant>)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)
(And BTW, why are people assuming I'm being anti-fat? To tell the truth, I'm a little uncomfortable using the word "fat" so liberally, but that seemed to be the convention on the thread, and I went with it.)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Which is why I said I didnt like to use the word. I suspect people will misinterpret the tone of this thread. No one is dissin' the curvy girls.. are they?
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe "fat" is a word you can take the piss out of by making it your own, like "fag." I'm no stick myself, you know.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)
unless you're purposefully avoiding being with someone you do or might love because they're too skinny or too fat. < /mom's common sense>
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)
And I dont know many who do... everyone I know has dated people of all kinds of sizes (self included).
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:53 (twenty-one years ago)
How has it been plaguing you, jess?
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
x-post: i've NEVER been comfortable with my body, and i seemingly have no way to disguise the fact. as anyone who hangs out with me - when i'm not on anti-d's - will notice, i am constantly picking at my body in various ways: plucking at pants or shirts, adjusting collars or legs, nervously shifting in my seat, squeezing my arms or legs. it's actually gotten much better.
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 15 August 2003 05:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I've been fat since I was nine years old so I've never had the knowledge of what it's been like to be thin rather than fat.I've taken my share of abuse for it, but really I don't care a huge amount about it anymore. I have difficulty buying clothes and that drives me nuts, but the situation is definetely improving.. I don't really think it's fair to accuse fat women of not taking care of themselves when there are far fewer options for them to buy decently made well fitting clothes. Most of the stuff that's out there is either incredibly floral and makes me look like manchester or is a muu muu.I don't think that fat is a bad word, some of the connotations that come with it are bad, but that's not 'fat's' fault.I don't like hanging around with a lot of fat people, I don't like the way it looks, like I'm not worthy of 'thin' people's company.. but that's my stereotype and it's not fair on anyone.Most of my friends are absolutely gorgeous, and I am very shallow.. I doubt I'd be my own friend.. but they spend alot of time obsessing over their looks, whether they're too fat or unnattractive when they're stunners.. it bores me.I haven't ever had a proper boyfriend, that's more my issues with guys then people not finding me attractive.As for the media portrayals, I think Lara Flynn Boyle is absolutely gorgeous, as is Camryn Manheim.. beauty runs the gamut of different sizes and shapes and the media responds to the publics demands.So if you don't like it, don't buy it or watch it.I no longer read beauty magazines and if I do I read them with a very critical eye.Last night I had a very long convo with a gorgeous blonde girl and it was like having a conversation with an issue of cosmo, I walked away feeling very lucky to be a fat brunette.this probably doesn't make sense, but I'm going to go have the lovely dinner minna just made for me.
― Nellie (nellskies), Friday, 15 August 2003 08:13 (twenty-one years ago)
Just to bring up this painful moment from yesterday again--this is a misleading comment of the nth degree. Size charts have gotten expotentially larger since then. What was a "size 14" in the early '60s is not even remotely the same size as what is a size 14 now. She was much closer to what is 8/10 now a days for the majority of her career (obv fluctuations etc). This is just a fact of life; if you want to bolster commentary about "larger" sizes being beautiful there are plenty of women that actually do fit this size 12+ argument that you could use (Liv Tyler's sister to thread, Sophie Dahl, Emme, Kate Winslet during Titanic period, Faith Evans...)
I don't understand why Marilyn Monroe is brought into ALL of these debates. Have any of you ever seen any of her actual costumes, etc? Marilyn Monroe was about my size, with slightly bigger breasts. I wear a size 6 on my "fat" days. As a rather avid Monroe fan, I can't stand untruths being spread around about her.
This is not a commentary on weight itself.
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.judgmentofparis.com/images/KD13.jpg
booyah.
― Nellie (nellskies), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 15 August 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
just kiddin' (badly)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 15 August 2003 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 16:44 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.digischool.nl/ckv1/film/hot3.jpg
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
really, i am realizing more and more that good hair, shoes, clothes, accessories (and my definition of "good" is pretty broad/weird) means more to me than any body type ever could.
christ i'm shallow. and even worse, i'm sub-culturally shallow.
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 15 August 2003 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 15 August 2003 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)
So, basically, what you are saying is that these things don't exist on anyone under a size 12-14? You're as a bad as people who discriminate against heavy people, in that case.
You take a look at Marilyn Monroe. The woman was clearly not overweight or even a size 14 by today's definition of a size 14. Anyone who has worked within fashion or has experience with vintage clothes will tell you the same thing--a size 12 or 14 then is MUCH SMALLER than one today.
This has nothing to do with weight. This has to do with facts. Like I said, use a beautiful woman who this actually applies to as your example.
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)
For someone so smug about how stupid and inconsequential every ILX discussion is, you need to learn reading comprehension a bit better. I'm sorry, I'm a little goddamned testy today.
I would also be thrown out of a modelling agency. This doesn't stop the fact that I'm NOT A SIZE 14.
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Somebody asks one of the stupidest, most insipid questions this board has ever seen and immediately 500 people all jump over themselves to answer it and discuss the issue. I am really, really bewildered.
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)
(XP x 4)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Therefore if she can dish it out, she better be able to take it.
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tep (ktepi), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 15 August 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
Tom, wtf is that picture?
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)
"Allow me to mount a soapbox for a moment. I'm tired of hearing from various quarters that 'Marilyn Monroe was a size 12.' While M.M. was indeed fleshier than many of the stick-women popular in today's fashion and entertainment circles, the size 12 she may have worn in the 1960s was much smaller than the size 12 of 1996. For example, according to the 1969 edition of How You Look and Dress, a Misses' size 12 measured 34-25 1/2- 36. Today, a size 12 is approximately 38-29 1/2-40 1/2 (though as every woman knows, size vary widely from manufacturer to manufacturer.) Monroe's measurements "in her prime" according to dress designer Billy Travilla) were 35-22-35 spread over a 5'51/2", 117 pound frame- hardly a current size 12 by any standard."
― rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 15 August 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 15 August 2003 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 15 August 2003 23:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Dogshit (lucylurex), Saturday, 16 August 2003 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)
The size 14/16/18 myth appears to stem from an early movie where she says she's size 14. However, people who have handled vintage clothes from that period say that that size is closer to a contemporary US size 10.
― j.lu (j.lu), Saturday, 16 August 2003 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, but your screen name is "dogshit."
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)
It does seem (me in stating obvious shocker etc) that this subject really provokes a v. strong response from lots of women. I've had prob a complex about body image, to greater/lesser degree, since about age 12, I should say. What's worrisome is this almost seems normal to me 'cause many of my friends have the same. I suppose I am skinny by any normal standard, so I read Elle and Vogue just to make sure my idea of what's 'normal' and 'skinny' is appropriately warped. :)
Incidentally, despite my constant defensiveness about being 'grande comme une americaine' when I was in France, I was surprised by a really different attitude about weight. Surely it wasn't everyones' - what I noticed came from reading lots of fashion magazines and women's magazines, mostly. I was struck by the tone of the articles on diet, fitness, personal care and such, as well as the way my housemate and our neighbors talked about these subjects. It was as if taking care to stay slim is just what one does, a matter of course - and how to do so was addressed more directly without any need to address readers' various complexes about motivation, body image, etc.
So when several neighbors talked about how their diets were going, I think I was the only one whose immediate reaction was to want to say, "No, that's not necessary, don't do that, you are fine just the way you are."
― daria g (daria g), Saturday, 16 August 2003 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Hearing people say "I'm a size 6" always freaks me out, cos thats like Kate Moss or less size in Aust garments. I wish I knew measurements so I could be less vague...
― Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 16 August 2003 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)
If I dealt with the Americentric guilt of enjoying food the same way I deal with the Catholicism-centered guilt of having premarital sex, I'd make Lara Flynn Boyle look like the Michelin Man. Perhaps it's the fact that the only way I can really treat myself, nurture myself, spoil myself, is through food, that has prevented me from becoming a walking skeleton.
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't know you at all, but I sincerely doubt that's true.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm no therapist, but it seems to me that you have earned the right to have far more confidence than you do. Is this because of your body image?
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)
But at the same time, totally on the money.
― Tep (ktepi), Saturday, 16 August 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)
I do think that some cultures have a very different feeling about body size and shape; I seem to appeal to Middle Eastern and Mediterranean and Hispanic men more then I appeal to those of a nordic descent. Of course, I prefer dark-haired men (and women) in general. But I object to the title of this thread, as it seems to be far too severe of a generalization. I am white and I find larger sized women and men to be attractive. I don't like the assumption that all white people hold a view that all fat women are unattractive. I also do not like the characterization of women as 'girls' in this context. (Though maybe the implication is that it's not attractive for a 'girl' [birth to early teens?] to be large, but that it's okay for older women to be so?)
The biggest thing for me, related to body size, is whether or not someone is healthy and happy. I'm large. I'm also absurdly strong and fairly fit. I don't have a lot of quick speed but I have endurance. (A friend of mine used to call me a BMW or a Burly Mountain Woman. It's an apt description in many ways, though I can do the feminine schtick when it's required.) So long as someone is healthy and exercises regularly (meaning raises heart-rate for a certain period of time, not weight-lifting or compulsively exercising) and takes care of themselves, then they're quite all right in my book. And the chances are that I will find them attractive. (Though I am not certain how much of that attraction is based on body size/fitness level and how much is based on being attracted to someone who likes themselves and cares for themselves.)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Hey, I loved City Slickers! But yeah, you're right. (That would be in response to the first sentence, of course.)
Partly, and also partly because of my overall image. I like to pretend I have reams of self-assuredness and that I walk tall with my head raised at all times, but in reality I'm always going to think I've failed whatever physical standards I've set for myself, self-assigned personal standards in general, or society's general standards. Much of this thread makes me feel a little bit relieved that I don't have the same physique as a Julia Roberts or a Cindy Crawford, but I'm always going to have those demons inside telling me I look hideous.
Does this make any sense at all?
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)
For me, so much self-esteem now comes from knowing that the world is good and that I am making a good contribution to the world. And that first step is to start seeing what is good and celebrating that in whatever way you are comfortable with. Food is not a bad place to start from; but look at what you're eating and how it's prepared. I used to detest vegetables and ate a lot of starches instead. But then I learned that when veggies are not cooked to a bland, tasteless mush they are actually good. Take pride in what you make. Take pride in serving it to yourself and to your family and friends. You're creating hedonistic, nurturing, wonderful dishes for those that you love. And in that you are doing something to build-up yourself.
I know this all sounds hokey. But if you're serious about wanting to get through this state of mind then start with the more simple things and work your way forward. It's a struggle at first. But with some outside 'applause' at your efforts and acknowledgement of your gifts that you share with others you will start to realize just how valuable and important and beautiful you are. And when you start to feel down on yourelf, reach out and let people know that you need to be bolstered-up for a bit. We all need that, but it's hard to ask for. Ask those that you trust and that you love; they'll be happy to help you along this path.
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)
The title of this thread no longer fits this thread at all. So be it.
Can't this thread be both on-topic and off-topic at the same time? I'd like it that way.
It makes more than sense. It makes you a true American. Rejoice! You're a fuckin' PATRIOT!
*laugh* The hilarious thing is that I am a "true American" AND a "fuckin' PATRIOT!". That can't be the answer, though, can it?
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)
Our society says that women need to be sexy. And in order to be sexy we need to be skinny. Yet if you look at lingerie models, while they're on the slender end of things, they're still a lot curvier than the women that you see on the walkways at fashion shows. Women are supposed to be curvy and warm and soft. I found/find that it helps to buy lingerie from places like Lane Bryant where the models are larger sized and beautiful and sexy.
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)
They usually can't help it. God bless 'em.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:19 (twenty-one years ago)
*stops, thinks for a moment*
Ms Laura dearie, ok if this moves onto e-mail? Don't want to COMPLETELY derail the original topic at hand! Even though I know your post has some relevance with the original discussion, it would still be nice to have this exchange in a more private arena. Danke.
*continues scribbling*
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Don't settle for anyone who doesn't love you for all of you, or who wants to somehow change you. There is a wonderful person out here who will be the right one for you. And maybe they'll be more comfortable making their move when they know that you love yourself as well. (I know that I used to always be putting myself down, and believing what I was saying, until someone pointed-out to me that it was impossible to give me a compliment because I just contradicted them and refused to accept it, which implied that they were stupid to offer it in the first place. Maybe you're falling into that pattern?)
Anyway, reach out to us here - we've been where you are and can be your cheering section (and we can snarl at anyone who isn't supportive of you, too *grin*).
(X-POST .. Dee, email is fine, as is AIM.)(X-POST 2 ... Kenan, you need a really big hug for saying that. Thank you.)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)
For excellent plus-sized lingerie (with plus-sized models) also try: http://www.hipsandcurves.com
http://www.hipsandcurves.com/img/x8601jad.jpg
(X-POST - They're one of the best things in the world, I think, Kenan.)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)
However I saw a recent pic of myself today and was surprised by how fat and unattractive I looked. :( I felt really bad and unsexy.
Then I ate a huge piece of truffle chocolate marble cake and had a few beers and forgot about it.
― Texas Sam (thatgirl), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 05:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Mmmm yeah...too many (much?) curves are better than none at all.
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 16 August 2003 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)
kenan, i don't object to the word "fat", because its a lovely word with bad connotations. i like the idea of reclaiming it. the word "overweight" is intrinsically normative - it implies a "normal" weight and designates a person to be "over" it, and that sucks.
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Saturday, 16 August 2003 07:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Fucking hell Kenan, are you actually me? I put on a stone a year at university, I'm now 5'8" and about 180pounds, though Emma assures me I carry it well.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Your American eqivalent, anyway.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 16 August 2003 08:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Saturday, 16 August 2003 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Sunday, 17 August 2003 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Sunday, 17 August 2003 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Sunday, 17 August 2003 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 18 August 2003 02:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― ButterflyGirl, Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)
http://ourworld.cs.com/MeSoLoca/ditto.jpg
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― kirsten (kirsten), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
(xp)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Do you have big boobs?
― pete s, Thursday, 26 February 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 26 February 2004 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 February 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Patrick Kinghorn, Thursday, 26 February 2004 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
I think this theory has some support, from my own experience anyway.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
x-post
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Thursday, 26 February 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 26 February 2004 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Thursday, 26 February 2004 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)
That works on SO many levels.
― mei (mei), Thursday, 26 February 2004 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 February 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:00 (twenty years ago)
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:03 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:06 (twenty years ago)
― Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:11 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:12 (twenty years ago)
http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/005276.html
Is that for real? There is no way that first person is Paris Hilton. WTF?
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:14 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:16 (twenty years ago)
In fact, you might know me by my previous name: Dabney.http://www.calarts.edu/~nstrum/macmame/reviews/warrev/warjpgs/forehead.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:18 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:19 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:20 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:22 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:23 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:24 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago)
Why do I feel like this conversation would be better suited to the noise board.
xpost CRAZIAN!!!!!!!!
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:26 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:36 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:38 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:39 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:41 (twenty years ago)
― Ian John50n (orion), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:44 (twenty years ago)
― Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:45 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:46 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:51 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:51 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:53 (twenty years ago)
Space Imaging's IKONOS satellite took this image of the patriotic Fritzler Corn Maze near Greeley, Colorado, September 18, 2004.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 December 2004 00:56 (twenty years ago)
― OLD SPICE® CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (ex machina), Friday, 22 July 2005 06:28 (nineteen years ago)
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/4234/image002x2km.jpg
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Tumililingan (ex machina), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Kitten, the body needs it, the body cries out for Ian Riese-Moraine! (Eastern Ma, Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Jimmy Mod Is Sick of Being The Best At Everything (ModJ), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― richardk (Richard K), Sunday, 24 July 2005 01:34 (nineteen years ago)
― richardk (Richard K), Sunday, 24 July 2005 01:37 (nineteen years ago)
England is having the government censor junk food ads that might appeal to children or go on during their programming. I've read that they're just as bad but of course it's all bunk as BMI is a horrible way to judge fatness.
― Cunga (Cunga), Sunday, 24 July 2005 03:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 25 July 2005 22:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 25 July 2005 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Tumililingan (ex machina), Monday, 25 July 2005 22:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Brandon, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 07:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 07:59 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:03 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:11 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:18 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:20 (nineteen years ago)
― splates (splates), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:34 (nineteen years ago)
― j b everlovin' r (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 08:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 09:15 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 09:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 09:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Gary, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
― mangina, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 15:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Gary, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 16:08 (nineteen years ago)
― scourge of linden ave, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.claudiocaprara.it/archives/Arthur%20Miller%20con%20la%20sua%20fidanzata%20Marilyn%20Monroe%20a%20passeggio.jpg
― Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Lars and Jagger (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Stocks, Monday, 1 May 2006 01:54 (nineteen years ago)
― electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Monday, 1 May 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 1 May 2006 05:03 (nineteen years ago)
― animal, Monday, 1 May 2006 05:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr Jones (Mr Jones), Monday, 1 May 2006 06:28 (nineteen years ago)
Do you think Orbit smells like bologna?
― gershy, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 03:24 (seventeen years ago)
Wow. There are some real gems in here.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:05 (fifteen years ago)
I'm always worried that my penis will be too small for a girl that big. Irrational? Maybe.― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, August 15, 2003 10:08 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:07 (fifteen years ago)
ENBB is reviving old ILX threads to find the darkest corners of men's souls.
― tbqf fridays (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:08 (fifteen years ago)
I just discovered the random threads button for the first time. These just happen to be the best.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:10 (fifteen years ago)
omg this thread
i miss jess
― c.c. crabcock (electricsound), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:11 (fifteen years ago)
Answer 2: The question may be more about how big you and she are in body size. I am the same length and I have indeed popped out from time to time, but I think this happens to every one. What we have found is that it is more about how fat we are - if your partner is a fat woman, you may not be able to get your penis into her vagina without a risk of it falling out, and you have to take shorter strokes to keep it in there
http://www.the-penis-website.com/size4.html
― velko, Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:11 (fifteen years ago)
without a risk of it falling out
oh no! :-(
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Wednesday, 8 July 2009 05:13 (fifteen years ago)