the new harry potter movie, harry potter and the goblet of fire

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...not very good. worst one yet. extremely poor storytelling (even worse than the last one). dead-eyed characters. a couple of ok set pieces.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 02:16 (twenty years ago)

The last one was the best of all! I'm not surprised this one is so bad though, check out the directors other credits.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 14 November 2005 02:18 (twenty years ago)

i liked the style cuaròn had going on in the last one but it was very poorly plotted.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)

none of the books really have story arcs well-suited for movies, I think, although i thought this one had the best chance of working since I think it's the best-balanced of the books... shame about the stylistic momentum being shot, though; azkaban was great to watch.

dave k, Monday, 14 November 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

the 3rd one was my fave

kingfish cold slither (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 14 November 2005 02:53 (twenty years ago)

The "directors other credits" include Four Wedding and a Funeral and Donnie Brasco!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 14 November 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

...and Tin Cup and Mona Lisa Smile.

None of which lead me to believe he's well-suited for a visually-inventive kid's film.

Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Monday, 14 November 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

i wonder if just got hacked to pieces in the editing room or something.

donnie brasco is awesome btw

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 06:10 (twenty years ago)

We will get another pervy comment from Ebert on Hermione's flowering womanhood?

Are You Nomar? (miloaukerman), Monday, 14 November 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

you can count on it!

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)

how is david tennant (barty crouch)?

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 14 November 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)

no spoilers! It opens Friday here. Have my tix, can't wait. :)

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

We will get another pervy comment from Ebert on Hermione's flowering womanhood?

I am mostly looking forward to this movie so that I can read Ebert's undoubtedly creepy review.

KSTFUNS (Ex Leon), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

I dunno if I wanna pay best of a tenner to see it. Is it around on 8it70rr3n7 yet?

Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

careometer.jpg

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure my brother can get you a bootleg DVD of it. But sometimes his bootlegs are shit, like when you see someone's silouhette get up and walk across the frame.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

David Tennant is in it???

This actually makes me interested in the idea of a Harry Potter film!

(FWIW, I thought the book was long, big and baggy, and the final plot-twist was a bit crap)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

I don't read the books but I like the films, so I'll probably go and see it if I can find someone to go with me. The underage ginger lad is starting to look fairly erm... worryingly cute. Plus, they always have great actors in the scenery-chewing roles. Catty tried to get me all het up by telling me that Jared Harris was in it, but I'm glad I didn't believe her.

Lady Totteringby-Gently (kate), Monday, 14 November 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

GOF is my favorite of the books. Not as long as OOTP which was a bit drawn out and boring.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 14 November 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

They've all been drawn out and horribly paced since GOF. Get a less sycophantic editor, woman!

chap who would dare to tell uninteresting celeb spotting stories (chap), Monday, 14 November 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

She has an editor?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Monday, 14 November 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

Well, possibly a transcriber.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 November 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

i liked the book, mostly, except for the first, endless 150 pages, all that quidditch cup stuff and shameless dull expository business.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

I know they cut the hermione/house elf business out of the movie, YAY.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 14 November 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

wait, which business was that?

kingfish cold slither (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 14 November 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

yup. they cut a bunch of business out. which i was glad for, or at least would have been, if it wasn't so awkward.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 14 November 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

What's with Cedric Diggory looking pale and fey? I thought he was supposed to be a star athlete.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Monday, 14 November 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

I know they cut the hermione/house elf business out of the movie, YAY.

HEAR HEAR. Dobby in Chamber of Secrets combined the worst of Gollum and Jar Jar Binks, turned up to 11.

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

it's so uncomfortable that stuff, in the book... doesn't it end up with hermione realizing that the slaves are actually happier where they are?!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Sounds like the Doozers in Fraggle Rock.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

the final plot-twist was a bit crap

Are you talking about Crouch Jr.'s big confession? How many rules of the Evil Overlord List did that violate?

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)

I saw it, it was fine I thought, but it is nothing *but* set-pieces!

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 20 November 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

And Jarvis!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 20 November 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

not enough jarvis!

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 20 November 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

not nearly enough jarvis, but otherwise i really liked this movie a lot.

carly (carly), Sunday, 20 November 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

the weasley twins were shockingly hott, I'm usually not one for gingers but wow!

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 20 November 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

They have no souls though, which makes things difficult.

Lars and Jagger (Ex Leon), Sunday, 20 November 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

I liked it a lot! I did think there were sections of dialogue that didn't scan at all, plus there was a lot of wierdness over eligibility for the third task.

If I'm being completely honest though, the extreme hilarity of the girls' school entrance carried the rest of the movie. Also, there were a bunch of kids in the theatre whose parents clearly hadn't read the book; one in particular kept saying "IT'S SCARY! THIS MOVIE IS SCARY!" It was kind of awesome.

Dan (Nightmares For Billy) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 20 November 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

it was weird how they showed the magic boat and magic carriage arriving and leaving but there was never a shot of the kids from the other schools disembarking or re-boarding those vehicles.

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 20 November 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)

'you can check out anytime you like but you can never leave'

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 20 November 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

is the actor from harry potter...

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 21 November 2005 00:44 (twenty years ago)

it was weird how they showed the magic boat and magic carriage arriving and leaving but there was never a shot of the kids from the other schools disembarking or re-boarding those vehicles.

It was weird how they fit 500 French girls into a carriage the size of a Mini Cooper!

Dan (Hot Twister Action!) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 21 November 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

Actually, while we're skirting around that subject, precisely at what point does Harry stop going "Oh wow, MAGIC!!!!!"? Because after four years of being exposed to and learning magic, for him to still have starry-eyed "I CAN'T BELIEVE IT OMG" reactions is making him appear borderline retarded.

Dan (No Shit It's Magic, You Fucking Feeb) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 21 November 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Definitely looks 'hacked to pieces' in editing. I mean, 155 minutes is so SHORT for a movie about KIDS and MAGIC.

I've never seen any of em and almost fell asleep reading one chapter to a juvenile, but that Bulgarian lad in this one looks seriously smokin'.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

editing does not equal length dude

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

i assume you were being sarcastic... or something

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

walk away.

Allyzay must fight Zolton herself. (allyzay), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

It was weird how they fit 500 French girls into a carriage the size of a Mini Cooper!

Pah...TARDIS technology...

j.lu (j.lu), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha! I really want a TARDIS now.

Dan (Come Into My Parlour, Said The Lecher To The Cheerleading Squad) Perry (Dan, Monday, 21 November 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

Please try lengthening something by hacking it to pieces. I'm sure you know my first suggestion.

xpost
Hot Lips, so Zen.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)

a movie can be poorly edited and still long, einstein

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

There was a kid a few rows back that would not shut up throughout the movie - it was like watching the film w/ a senile grandmother. "Who's that?" "What's he doing?" "Did he die?" "Why's he swimming?" "What's that noise?" Whenever his parents deigned to tell him to zip it, he'd just ask the same question in a vaguely lower volume. However, the little rugrat eventually redeemed himself: when the camera zoomed out & showed how big the hedge maze was, kid said, beyond his years, "Are you KIDDING?"

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

As entertaining as they were, you could probably have shortened all of the task scenes by something like 5 minutes apiece and reused that time to make some of the bizarre shouty conversations actually flow as opposed to abruptly going from "Hi, Harry! Hi, Ron!" to "OMG I FUCKING HATE YOU AND EVERYTHING YOU STAND FOR, EAT AN ENTIRE WHALE ASS!"

(xpost: HAHAHA)

Dan (Teenage Girls Aren't THAT Capricious) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

Teenage Girls Aren't THAT Capricious

Dan: Not the Vampire Slayer

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)

My name is Julia, and I am a pervy fangirl. And Mike Newell is my enabler. But did the regenerated Voldemort have to look so much like Batboy?

Hahaha! I really want a TARDIS now.

Which reminds me, a year ago I saw a Mini Cooper with the vanity plate "TARD1S."

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

haha when i saw this (wasn't crazy about it, liked fiennes alright) and barty sr popped up some kid in the row in front of me gasped 'it's HITLER!'

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 03:04 (twenty years ago)

all the wands from the future in the backround really distracted me from enjoying this film.

for realz tho i didnt know wtf they were talking about for tons
of this movie.. (i have not seen the last 2)

howell huser (chaki), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 03:05 (twenty years ago)

blount that's hilarious

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)

ok, two questions:
Why didn't Harry narc on Malfoy's daddy? He was awake for that entire "I still follow the Dark Side, master..." speech.

Do the books explain the denazification of the evil people? Snape and the Rasputiny dude were both folowers of the evil dark emperor lord sith - the former turned informant and the latter named names... and now they're teachers? Wha?

There were other things that confused me a bit, but in the course of the seven-hour epic I forgot them.

It was OK, I guess. All the actors are good, they've got the pacing down fairly well, but I wish they'd stop trying to shoehorn in an entire book and just give me a real plot.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 04:42 (twenty years ago)

Sadly, Ebert doesn't even mention Hermione in her ball gown. I was hoping for some serious creepage.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 04:44 (twenty years ago)

I didn't like Michael Gambon as Dumbledore - he seemed cold and aggressive, instead of the kindly twinkly-eyed wizard who cared about Harry. And his voice was all wrong, one minute he had a sort of Irish accent, the next he was all shouty like a Richard Harris wannabe. I wondered if he had only read the script, and not actually the book.

The graveyard scene was wrong, too - the regeneration/rebirth scene wasn't scary enough for me. The other Death Eaters were supposed to be in awe of/terrified of Voldemort, not just standing around like they'd been called to a Friday afternoon management meeting. Ralph Fiennes was good as Voldemort, except I kept looking at him and thinking "why has he got Michael Jackson's nose?" which kind of ruined it for me. I kept expecting him to do a rendition of Thriller.

C J (C J), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:11 (twenty years ago)

Saw this last night. Dodgy sexual tension between everyone in the fucking film that bordered between amusing and uncomfortable. They are all supposed to be 14, FFS. Thought there were some brilliantly racist undercurrents (french girls, commie boys, and that massive fuck off leprechaun at the beginning).

Generally I found the whole middle class bording school thing to grate MASSIVELY on me, and found it more pronounced, and really didn't enjoy the sickening moralising all the time. Easily the darkest of the films, and more should have been made of this almost sinister aspect. Thought it was actually quite heavy going for what is supposedly a kid's film.

The Voldemort scene at the end was an exact take off of the video for Come To Daddy.

Also, was I the only person to think, 'thank fuck' when the tents were burning at the start. Plummy happy clappy bastards.

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

Saw this last night. Dodgy sexual tension between everyone in the fucking film that bordered between amusing and uncomfortable. They are all supposed to be 14, FFS. Thought there were some brilliantly racist undercurrents (french girls, commie boys, and that massive fuck off leprechaun at the beginning).

Generally I found the whole middle class bording school thing to grate MASSIVELY on me, and found it more pronounced, and really didn't enjoy the sickening moralising all the time. Easily the darkest of the films, and more should have been made of this almost sinister aspect. Thought it was actually quite heavy going for what is supposedly a kid's film.

The Voldemort scene at the end was an exact take off of the video for Come To Daddy.

Also, was I the only person to think, 'thank fuck' when the tents were burning at the start? Plummy happy clappy bastards.

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

Do the books explain the denazification of the evil people?

After the fall of Voldemort, a lot of his followers claimed to have been acting under the Imperius curse (as conveniently demonstrated by Crouch Jr.-as-Moody in that classroom sequence).

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)

Oops, posted twice just to correct a typo. Sorry. I guess you just can't beat the POST request sometimes.

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

We don't know exactly what Snape said or did to clear himself in Dumbledore's eyes and gain his trust. I expect that will be revealed in 7 since it probably ties in to Snape's, uh you know, what he does in 6. Don't want to spoil for anybody.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

Hello, this is the internet. We ALL know what he did in 6!

BARMS, Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)

I'm just being nice you know. Not all Jon Williams.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

The casting remains really good, even ridiculously so - it's just showing off to have the groundskeeper who's killed in the first five minutes played by Eric Sykes.

The giantess is plated by Mrs. Jones off Rising Damp.

Brendan Gleeson = excellent.

I was right when I saw the first one and said "That boy who plays Ron is just going to end up with that expression on his face permanently".

Daniel Radcliffe is getting good at the tricky bit of playing Harry, which is justifying the stupid things that he does when a sensible plan of action would shorten the film to 5 minutes. He's good at being headstrong but not oafish.

Michael Gambon is terrible. Bring back the corpse of Richard Harris!

Less Rita Skeeter as well = a good thing.

The climactic scene was a bit short-changed, but I can't decide whether it would be more or less awkward if they worked in the fact from Book 1 that their wands are twins. Definitely making clear that the shadowy figure are his parents would have made a difference.

The post-climactic scenes, the best in the book, are completely shortchanged, as it's missing the whole "No-one believes us, everyone's going to DIE" business. It sounded like Dumbledore was just telling them what would be in tomorrow's papers, rather than breaking the official secrets act.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 26 November 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

One the one hand, the book is the most "to be continued" of the series. On the other hand, the film is already For The Fans - no setup for people who've not seen the previous ones (that's a good thing, at this stage).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 26 November 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

(missing connecting thought between those two posts = the film has been given a "movie ending" - obviously a fully faithful translation would end with the+ Imperial Death March over the end titles)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 26 November 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)

that would've been great!

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 26 November 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

David Tennant wuz hottt, the rest of the movie a bit disappointing.

Lars and Jagger (Ex Leon), Sunday, 27 November 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm definitely going to see it in that case!

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 27 November 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

Finally saw this and liked it a lot actually. Loads of things missing but except for the ending, I liked what they chose to keep. And even though all the teen angst rivalry + romance shit were all awkward and weird, they also provided some of the best laughs, whereas in the book, it all just came out as angst. Didn't like Cho Chang - they could have gone with someone less typically cute. She's supposed to be the Ravenclaw seeker and one of the most popular girls in school. Cedric Diggory should have been played by the kid who played Oliver Wood in the first few movies.

Could have cut short a couple of the task scenes because the whole ending is completely disappointing and pretty much ruined the whole movie. There was none of the dread and panic of "omg, VOLDEMORT IS BACK, WE'RE ALL FUCKED". It also doesn't explain a lot of things - why their wands reacted that way, how Barty Crouch Jr escaped from Azkaban. And Dumbledore's speech at the end was TERRIBLE, which might not have mattered if they had managed to convey properly how tragic/needless Cedric's death actually was. In the book, there was a short scene with Harry and Cedric's parents which added a bit of gravity that could have easily been included. They should really just stop giving the movies bloody Hollywood endings - sure, the books end optimistically but most of the time they end with the threat of impending doom.

During the scene in the graveyard when Voldemort says "Let me tell you what really happened..." etc. I was just dying for him to go "HARRY... I AM YOUR FATHER". Seriously, the entire graveyard scene was like a mix of all climactic Star Wars scenes minus the mind reading - lopped off hands, electricity-like Cruciatus, duels, even a Revenge-echoing "NOOOOOOOO!!".

Hermione remains the best out of the central three but Daniel Radcliffe is getting there.

Also, am I the only one who liked the Weasley twins? In any case, they were the only good things about the next instalment (whereby they exit with a big resounding "Fuck off" to the school), so they'll be the only thing to look forward to in Order of the Phoenix, by far the dullest and least memorable of all the books.

Roz (Roz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

You're not alone. I loved Fred and George in this one.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

Yes, they were great.

I thought it was brilliant that when Cho actually gets to speak, she's Scottish, though I can't quite articulate why.

What's with Cedric Diggory looking pale and fey? I thought he was supposed to be a star athlete.

Public School sports stars aren't exactly American Footballers.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

I didn't like Michael Gambon as Dumbledore - he seemed cold and aggressive, instead of the kindly twinkly-eyed wizard who cared about Harry. And his voice was all wrong, one minute he had a sort of Irish accent, the next he was all shouty like a Richard Harris wannabe. I wondered if he had only read the script, and not actually the book.

Me too.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

Yeah also by wizarding standards, Harry himself is supposed to be a star athlete and he's about as dorky as it gets. Other than Neville.

And I thought it was great that Cho was Scottish too though I have no idea why either.

xpost

Roz (Roz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

Public School sports stars aren't exactly American Footballers.

Especially in a sport in which the broom does most of the hard work.

j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:15 (twenty years ago)

Heh, according to his imdb biography, Harry Potter is an indie fuxor.

Although he loves to play Playstation, listen to music (some of his faves are The Stereophonics, R.E.M. and U2), and write, he's also very active and energetic.

He also named Jane's Addiction, Libertines, The, Rage Against the Machine and Darkness, The among his favourite bands.

He enjoys listening to the music of Blur, Muse, The Music, Zwan and Brendan Benson.

Plays the bass guitar.

Some of his favorite music groups are Stratovarius (Finland), Huey Lewis and The News (USA), and Tom Robinson (England).

He is a fan of indie rock. Some of his favourite bands include: The Zutons, Razorlight, The Libertines, Bloc Party, Hope of the states, The Futureheads and Kaiser Chiefs.

He likes the music of The Strokes, The Clash, and The Pixies.

Roz (Roz), Friday, 2 December 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, I haven't really heard him name any of those except the Clash. He's a self-proclaimed punk and very into the Sex Pistols. But then I was too at his age. He'll grow out of it.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

totally the new Elijah Wood.

Roz (Roz), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

I'm becomming a fan of the Weasley clan, The twins were great, and I think Ron is probably the best actor out of the 3 main kids...

jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)

He's only got one facial expression!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

but it's the only expression he needs!

I don't know why, but Emma Watson really annoyed me in this film.

jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

i saw this on sunday, against my will. it sucked so hard i thought i'd turn inside-out: long-winded, tedious, predictable and pompous. mind you, i fucking hate the very concept of harry bloody potter with every fibre of my being, so perhaps i'm not the most impartial of judges.

still. it was jizz.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

I don't know why, but Emma Watson really annoyed me in this film.

Her character in the books is irredeemably annoying, so there's only so much that can be done with it.

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

According to imdb, Gary Oldman gave the kid a bass when they first met on the set of the last one.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

also, ian brown's cameo, etc.

kingfish trampycakes (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
Revive!

This movie fucking sucked almost as much as the last one. Michael Gambon is the worst actor I have EVER seen.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

but that Bulgarian lad in this one looks seriously smokin'.

yes! fuck. yes.

phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 02:54 (nineteen years ago)

Ralph Fiennes' acting improves massively without his nose.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 02:58 (nineteen years ago)

And if I see that Bulgarian lad on the street, I'll drop a handkerchief in front of him.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

I love these movies just because of their constant use of great (IMO) British actors (Robbie Coltrane, Timothy Spall, Alan Rickman, David Thewlis, etc.) the whole "dragon-getting-loose-and-tearing-up-half-the-castle" part I didn't particularly enjoy, too long and kind of absurd. Real pretty though, and I guess we ought to enjoy it as much as we can, since OotP stands a pretty good chance of being unwatchable.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 03:32 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't find this film longwinded exactly... like the first LOTR film it was more that it was like watching two films in a row on fast-forward.

Whereas I think the third might be favourite. Hard to say though, I don't really differentiate between the first three that much.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 08:02 (nineteen years ago)

i've got a TOTAL pash for the girl who played moaning myrtle.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 08:05 (nineteen years ago)

What, Shirley Henderson? I've met her. She's shy/self-effacing, a bit awkward, and kinda intense. (And Scottish.)

Settled down to watch HPATGOF on DVD on Saturday evening, and couldn't get on with it AT ALL. Deeply disappointing, as I enjoyed the first three a lot. Mind you, I gave up on the book about a third of the way through. Maybe it's just got too teenagery for me...

mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 10:19 (nineteen years ago)

She's also 41, she was Gail in Trainspotting :)

It's very good at being teenagery, I suppose that there'd be more goths except it's probably taken very seriously by the teaching staff.

Considering the book is the size of the OED, I think they did a great job.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 11:45 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I think they did the best job they could, considering. I just don't think the books are very cinematic - the plots are too jumpy and episodic. I also find Daniel Radcliffe supernaturally unlikeable.

chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/warner_brothers/harry_potter_and_the_goblet_of_fire/clemence_poesy/goblet1.jpg

It's all about Clémence Poésy. Even though she was underused and her character was weak.

I also find Daniel Radcliffe supernaturally unlikeable.

Yes, both off and on screen.

David Orton (scarlet), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

wtf, Jarvis is in this for six shots, totaling 20 secs of screentime. For the import that britpop(and keith relf) haircuts had on these movies, you'd think they'd give the band a bit more screentime.

Also, the neville kid doesn't look like a young pete townshend anymore. Such things disappoint me in my inebriated state.

kingfish, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 06:33 (eighteen years ago)

I hear a lot of that got cut. Long movie. I think there was more in the special features. Did you watch this in prep for OOTP?

I passed on a sneak preview last night as those are a beating. Have tix to go with friends tomorrow at the Alamo where victuals and beers may be enjoyed with the movie. SO EXCITED!!

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 13:42 (eighteen years ago)

SEEING OOTP TODAY!!!! WOO-HOO!!!

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)

SAW OOTP YESTERDAY!!!! HAW HAW!!!

HI DERE, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

:(

I can't stay up that late. And I passed on a sneak preview Monday as I wanted to enjoy it today with friends and beerz.

I'd say no spoilers but you know, I've read the book so. . .

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

I saw a sneak preview at 5:55 PM yesterday with my wife and some friends! GO GO GADGET CONNECTIONS

HI DERE, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

We are seeing it at the Alamo Drafthouse which serves food and drink. Last year they had the dark mark in the sky above the theater, had the lobby fixed up like Platform 9 3/4, and were serving butterbeer and pumpkin juice. The butterbeer was vile. I'm sticking Dos Equis.

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

The spacey new friend was kind of hilarious. All in all, I thought it was good but not worthy of the lavish praise critics are giving it.

I'd rank the five movies like this: 3-4-5-2-1

HI DERE, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

Hmm, I shall have to rank tomorrow.

Luna's a great character all-around. I'm curious how Umbridge works out. In my head I always pictured her as the short lady from Poltergeist. Not sure how Vera Drake will do it for me. For the record, I've never liked the new Dumbledore. Not solemn enough.

In the commercials Helena Bonham Carter looks fantastic (and a bit too hot) as Bellatrix Lestrange. Heard she unfortunately isn't on screen much.

Ms Misery, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

Meantime, this is a fun story. I like the guy!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)

i liked this one better.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

Hmm. . .not only am I an annoying rockist but they have spoiled me so far with being true to the books. Despite this the movies always disappoint a bit as they skim through so much of the story. I understand this is necessary for a film version. This time though they really made a major change (Cho being the snitch, WTF?!?!) and added some stuff that didn't happen in the book. You have to cut so much out why the fuck are you making stuff up???

I need to see it again before I can form an opinion on overall goodness.

Was I the only one who thought Tonks was mega cute? MORE TONKS, PLS!

Ms Misery, Thursday, 12 July 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

The girl who played Tonks looks exactly how I pictured her to; same goes for Luna, although I always imagined her voice being not nearly that soft. Anybody else think Kingsley Shacklebolt was dressed far too flamboyantly?

Anyway I liked this a lot, best in the series probably besides Prisoner of Azkaban, although MsM's Cho related WTF was a big WTF for me too.

The Half-Blood Prince book was so much shorter than OOTP (by, what, 300 pages?) I wonder if JK realized she was getting too carried away and wanted the last 2 books to be more movieizable - anyone know how long Deathly Hallows is supposed to be? OOTP has been by far my favorite of the books though, I'm not sure how I would feel if this theory proved to be true.

nickalicious, Thursday, 12 July 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

I pictured Tonks more as one of my old band teachers with short hair. I'm very glad film Tonks gave me a better image. But yeah, major cutie. I don't think Luna was eccentric enough. And what the hell was up with Shacklebolt being African? Just because he's black the muthafucker has to be from Africa??

I think I heard Deathly Hallows is 700-something pages.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 12 July 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Catching up on my Harry Potters (only saw the first two) and this one was really entertaining. I love the whole teen angst stuff, as cheesy as it is. Also I completely forgot about Jarvis Cocker so when he showed up playing the prom it was like I was 18 again!

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 4 September 2009 02:29 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.