S/D: (american?) indie rock 1987-1992

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
so, reading the various our band could be yr life threads, i realized/remembered something from my own reading of it, that - with a handful of notable exceptions - most of the bands stories end somewhere between 1986-1988 (breaking up, signing to a major, whatever.) while this is obv due to azzzzerads inbuilt prejudices, it also seems to outline a kind of "lost age" of american indie: post-"hardcore" (the reign of the sst bands, the final fall out of the original punks, etc.) but pre-"indie rock" (the first stirrings/bubblings of what would end up on matador/drag city/insert name here by the middle of the next decade.) a lot of these bands are probably destined to remain obscurities (with good reason?) which is why i have come to ilx. (also, i added the "american?" cuz i'm pretty familiar with brit-indie between 85-92.) most of what i do know comes out of spazz/screamo/hardcore, so school me as you see necessary.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha didn't expect this to be me, did you?

(inspired by donut bitch's trumans water thread.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

um, Galaxie 500, er, um

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)

fIREHOSE, Dumptruck, Yo La Tengo, Volcano Suns, Scrawl.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

squirrelbait
bastro
slint
honor role
bitch magnet
jesus lizard
lemonheads

simon 803 (simon 803), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm eager to see what results here, this is stuff I don't know well either

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

sub pop

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, the Gimme Indie Rock comp on K-Tel is probably yr best source for this. (duh, why didn't I think of that?)

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I second what Matos just suggested.
Granted it has one bonafide stinker for every three ace tracks, but thats why God gave us the "Skip Track" button.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)

throwing muses

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)

primus!

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, Simon did most of the ones I thought of.... that whole Louisville-Chicago scene.

Add:
Pussy Galore
The Gories

Aaron W (Aaron W), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Dischord-era Jawbox
pre-major-label American Music Club

Aaron W (Aaron W), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

A few I'd recommend (though some of these, I haven't heard for years):

Antiseen, *Honor Among Thieves*
Big Black, *Songs About Fucking*
Dag Nasty, *Field Day*
Death of Samantha, *Where the Women Wear the Glory and the Men Wear the Pants*
Green River, *Dry As a Bone*
Halo of Flies, *Garbage Rock*
The Holy Cows, *We Never Heard of You Either*
Precious Metal, *That Kind of Girl*
Saint Vitus, *Born Too Late*
Scrawl, *Plus Also Too*
Urge Overkill: *Stay Tuned 1988-1981: The Urge Overkill Story*
The Zeros: *4-3-2-1....Zeros*

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

That Urge Overkill comp is 1988 to 1991, not 1981. Sorry.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)

-the Feelies. go for "Crazy Rhythms" and "The Good Earth"

uhm, what else...let's see:

-Gun Club
-the Wipers. First 3 albums.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Material Issue?

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

blake babies

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Pixies

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Just from around DC I remember:

Slumberland Records: Velocity Girl, Whorl, Black Tamborine

and the Simple Machines label: Tsunami, and...

and Teenbeat, of course: Unrest, and much much more

Can't vouch for most of this as I wasn't interested at the time, and still not much since, but maybe others can.

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Weren't the Wipers and Feelies several years earlier???

Anyway, the marginality and mediocrity of a lot of the bands people (including me, in a lot of cases) are listing in this thread should give you a good idea why some of us who were obsessed with indie rock circa the mid '80s were listening more to Cover Girls/Expose/Stacey Q/Tiffany/Poison/GnR/Real Roxanne/etc. just a few years later, and (at least in my case) were extremely skeptical about Nirvana (not to mention Pixies/Pavement/Phair/etc.) just a few years after that. These really were slim times for indie-rock (and as far as I'm concerned, the slim times didn't even end until only the past couple years, but heck, what do I know). Anyway, that *Gimme Indie Rock* compilation really is a pretty smart place to start. That Death of Samantha album might be the only really great album on my list, too. (Actually, Sonic Youth's 1987 *Sister*, their best album by far, is as good as anything anybody's mentioned here--though maybe since, like Big Black, they're in Azzerad's book already they don't count.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

haha I went straight to Tiffany and Poison without having to graduate from 'indie rock'.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Thinking Fellers
Sun City Girls
Hypnolovewheel
Ungle Wiggly
Dogbowl
Band of Susans
WCKR SPGT
Pitchfork
Live Skull

ART PHAG!

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah... I think I still have this Human Music compilation album that came out on Homestead in 1988. Here's the tracklisting:

1. Doomsday performed by Verlaines
2. He Is God performed by Big Dipper
3. Alive Again performed by Live Skull
4. Lives of the Saints No. 135 (Naked Wife) performed by Honor Role
5. I'm Like You performed by Urinals
6. Standing at the Crosswords performed by Great Plains
7. Charmed Life performed by Half Japanese
8. Red Barn [live] performed by Salem Sixty Six
9. I'm in Heaven Now performed by American Music Club
10. Coming Through performed by Pastels
11. Aberration performed by Nice Strong Arm
12. Flesh-Colored House performed by Bastro
13. Quest performed by Phantom Tollbooth
14. Gravity performed by Tall Dwarfs
15. Ultravixen performed by Volcano Suns
16. Stanley performed by Antietam
17. I Wish I Was Adopted performed by Happy Flowers
18. Party in My Heart performed by Chills
19. Somebody's Baby performed by Yo La Tengo
20. Two-Week Vacation performed by Embarrassment
21. Oddity [live] performed by Clean
22. Do It performed by Death Of Samantha

Aaron W (Aaron W), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I just picked up Dag Nasty's first two albums on one Cd used a couple of weeks back and have enjoyed giving them a listen for the first time since the 80s. I had "Wig Out at Denkos" on one of those dope French pressed tapes that Dischord used to put out, which I got from the band seeing them live in Muncie, Indiana. It was my first real punk rock show. Brian Baker plays some great guitar on those songs.

Wipers and The Gun Club were both good groups. "Youth of America" by the Wipers and "Fire of Love" by The Gun Club are the first two to check in my book, but really they both are pretty consistent except the last couple of Wipers albums.

Mudhoney's early records were great. I remember that I really liked their self titled record better than that Nirvana band, which was just ok. I've seen people slag that self titled album for years and I never could understand why people either liked Superfuzz or Every Good Boy... so much more.

"Buzz Factory" by Screaming Trees is one of the most overlooked records of that period. It is their only album that I really liked. The more they smoothed out their sound, the worse they became. Lanegan has such a cool voice with all that wah wah guitars.

I liked all of The Feelie's albums, but their first one "Crazy Rhythms" is a definite step above the rest.

"Songs About Fxcking" is another great one, but most of "Rich Man's Eight Track" which includes Atomizer is also quite grand.

Flipper's first album "Generic" is another one to check, it is a favorite of mine.

Now they came a bit later than 92, but an indie band that I thought was good that no one seemed to like is Engine Kid. They got kind of slagged off as either a Melvins or Slint rip off, which they were of both, but that combined sound is pretty good if you ask me. I saw them live in Louisville with Silkworm with about 10 people and they were fun. Their album "Angel Wings" is one to pull out of the cheapy bins used, if you like this kind of thing, I think it is pretty good. Their other album is a bit more spazcore and I didn't like it.

Silkworm when they were a four piece was a good band, as a trio they lost much of their dynamics.

earlnash, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

american indie= the moles, the vaselines, this kind of punishment, bats, clean, orange juice, edwyn collins,... oh and dEUS. dunno if they still count because i can't remember when they started recording music.
at times i rated silkworm much higher than any other indie rock band.

nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

But again, Flipper's first album (which is indeed incredible -- and *Sex Bomb Baby*, which has all their singles, is at least as good) and that early Big Black stuff (which beats the trousers off of anything Steve Albini did later in life) came out long before 1987.

(And some of the best songs on that Homestead compilation, not to mention a bunch that Nathalie named, came from Flying Nun Records in New Zealand, which actually sounded way more alive indie-rock-wise than the United States did in the late '80s and early '90s. And the Urinals, though American, were MUCH earlier -- Their *Negative Capability...Check it Out* compilation is pretty great, end to end.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

And the Urinals, though American, were MUCH earlier

Urinals100 Flowers

donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

but pre-"indie rock" (the first stirrings/bubblings of what would end up on matador/drag city/insert name here by the middle of the next decade

this part confused me.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I agree gygax. "Indie Rock" was an '80s term. (Maybe Jess assumes otherwise.) The '90s just continued what had already started.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know, I remember the terms 'college rock' and even 'postmodern rock' (ack!) being much more upiquitous. weren't til the nineties that indie became the crux all genre line.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)

My college radio station called it "progressive." And you're right, Chuck, about that Homestead comp containing non-American bands... I just thought it was funny/appropriate, having come out in 1988. I seem to recall the vinyl version having a different tracklisting, since I know there was a GG Allen track on there.

Gun Club and Wipers key phases were early 80s, btw.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Incidentally, there were probably compilations on SST and Touch & Go as good as that Homestead one. I can't remember their names, though. (Oh wait, Touch & Go had one called *God's Favorite Dog* -- I did a Rockarama on it in Creem magazine! I have a feeling it's hard to find now, though. And the definitive early grunge compilation was *Deep Six,* on C/Z Records, though that one came out way back in 1985.)

"College Rock" and "Postmodern Rock" (and "Modern Rock," too!) were, like, Love and Rockets and Midnight Oil and the Church and R.E.M. (and maybe, okay, the Replacements and Husker Du, etc.); it was mainly stuff on commercial (and lots of college) stations -- college rock, in fact, tended to imply a certain folky wispy wussiness. Indie was indie (which isn't to say it wasn't also lots of OTHER names); don't know how WIDELY the term was used, but it was there. (And grunge was "sasquatch rock," as far as I cared, but never mind.) (And Big Black and Pussy Galore and Scratch Acid and so on were Pigfuck.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Opal-->Mazzy Star was about this time. Certainly nothing mindblowing, but I like that stuff.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't remember hearing the term "indie rock" until Sebadoh, but that's probably just where I was at -- college rock you heard all the time, & that was the post-REM scene.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

wipers albums that would fit the time-frame that were good:The Circle & Land of the Lost. but, heck, yeah, the more i think about it, this was around the same time that i gave up on amerindie and just listened to p-funk, mingus, can, and epmd instead. so, no regrets, really. it also coincides with madchester and bad albums by former new wave heroes. or at least, i seem to remember buying technique and blue bell knoll and never listening to them. eww, these were the days of the mission u.k. and horror shows like gut bank and christmas, no? double ewww.although, i did enjoy the fall's curious orange album, it really couldn't hold a candle to the amazing house, disco, pop, dance, rap of that day. sheesh, madonna alone...

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, if the point is that not until the '90s did "Indie Rock" imply a certain SOUND, well then, MAYBE I buy that. Which is why I still get confused when people use the term that way -- to me, "indie rock" is just rock on independent record labels, just like the words say. (except, o'course, the vast majority of it was never all that "rock.")

Then again, I'm from Detroit. And wrote for the Village Voice and stuff. Which obviously might make my experience different than some.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, half the late '80s Amerindie records I recommended above are actually probably "metal" to lots of people. Not to mention to me, too. But one does not negate the other, you know? And they WERE indie.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

even the feelies were on A&M by 87-88.and the best scratch acid stuff had come out by 86-if not all of it- yeah, i remember hearing those homestead clean/chills and staightjacket fits comps and the flying nun comps and THAT stuff was where it was at. although, galaxie 500 were cool in my book. my favorite swans albums came out then too: white light/love of life and my fave talk talk records too.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

haha I went straight to Tiffany and Poison without having to graduate from 'indie rock'.

I was about to say. That was just pop radio for me in high school -- like I had been listening to already!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

in 1981/82 danbury conn. the college radio station there used to call new wave/post punk, nu-rock!

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha Chuck that may be why your list is the only one that looked particularly enticing to me.

Fugazi's "Margin Walker" EP is actually pretty good.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

My chronological bearings are all sorts of goofy, so I might miss the target by a few years on either side. And, of course, as Chuck alludes to, any & all signs of ineptitude must be embraced in the punk rock spirit in which they are offered, lest you get all hung up on crap singing or shitty production values. And, of course, I'll be talking like y'all don't know shit, which I don't do out of lack of respect, but out of love. Kiss kiss.

- I recommend things like Barbara Manning's _Lately I Keep Scissors_ & Lois' _Bet the Sky_ (from 1995) despite Jess' known aversion for twee fuckery; Lois might err on the twee side, but it's still a solid record, & Ms. Manning ain't twee @ all, & if you dig her, it'll make a fine segue into exploring the happy-go-lucky side of Flying Nun (cf. the Clean, the Verlaines, Tall Dwarfs, etc.)

- Also on the side of twee, but decidedly untwee (when they wanna be) - Field Mice & Heavenly. That 2 CD Field Mice retrospective won't totally redeem the damning stereotypes that color the wunderbar world of indie-pop, but it goes a long way in justifying the existence of the genre/subculture (well, maybe not the subculture). And, for what it's worth, Saint Etienne covered one of their songs. After the first Heavenly record (which is twee with a lowercase t that wants to be an i with a heart as the dot) (not that this is a bad thing), it's all snide, rude, and charming skip-a-dee-doo-dah that'll win you over if you let it.

- Scrawl's a definite must-hear in this category, though I'm partial to the 2 Simple Machine re-/releases (the _Bloodsucker_ EP & _Velvet Hammer_) in terms of Scrawl's hookiness, or "pop smarts" (the former) & Scrawl's ability to pick at scabs until they bleed (the latter)

- On the rockier Clevelandy side o' thangs, there's Prisonshake - they have one full-length I'm aware of (which is pretty good & available via ScatRecords.com), but my pick is _I'm Really Fucked Now_, which I THINK is a European or Australian collection of songs from some ridiculous multimedia release the band put together (consisting of a tape, a CD, and a 7"? - darn me for not hitting the Trouser Press guide right next to me). It's great, though, if you want your indie rock to "redeem" blues-based thuggery.

- As a catch all introduction, you could do a LOT worse than snagging that _Human Music_ compilation, given all the threads you can investigate from there. The included Yo La Tengo song (covering Jackson Browne or Eddie Money) is 15 types of shit, though. There's the Flying Nun angle, of course, as well as the Cleveland Rocks! axis (Death of Samantha, Great Plains), and there's also the Embarrassment and the Urinals.

- The Embarrassment monkeyed with the usual canonical postpunkian icons we all know & take for granted, and then added a little of that eau de spazz that typifies the scattershot ramblings of the socially awkward middle class white kid weaned on Stan Lee & grape soda. The _Heyday_ retrospective is all you need (though _Blister Pop_ makes a fine addendum). If you like your spazzing to be a little more esoteric (& not so groovy), then you'll want the Great Plains in your life.

There's more to be said about the Urinals & 100 Flowers, and maybe pre-Imperial Unrest, and perhaps Small Factory, and lord knows what else, but I'm starting to wander a bit with the thoughts, so I'll stop here.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Holy crap I'm glad you folks stopped posting for 3.5 seconds so I could get my $.02 in.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

don't forget the god bullies. okay, you can if you want.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

and moonshakevomitlaunchmydadisdead

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Man, this era was the halcyon time when I first started doing college radio. These were some personal favorites:

Thinking Fellers
Death of Samantha
Urge Overkill
Slovenly
Couch Flambeau
Phantom Tollbooth
Laughing Hyenas
Sister Ray
Wedding Present
My Dad is Dead
Lazy Cowgirls
The Embarassment
Repulse Kava
Cosmic Psychos
Fastbacks
Unrest
The Fibonaccis
Snapper
Clawhammer
The Scene is Now
Snapper
Crystallized Movements
The Original Sins
Great Plains
Fish & Roses
The Bats
Union Carbide Productions
feedtime
Dustdevils
Vomit Launch
Pontiac Brothers
Scrawl
Pooh Sticks
Crawlspace
Mecca Normal
The Shams
Drunks With Guns
The Neats
The 3Ds
Breaking Circus

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and Baked Bean Teeth to thread!!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Even though this was also the time I got into college radio by DJing and all...I honestly don't have many American recommendations beyond, I dunno, the Wax Trax wing or something. But doubtless this doesn't surprise. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)

but if you look at it like this, it's mighty sad indeed:

Pain Teens & Tar -vs- Spacemen 3 & My Bloody Valentine

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh! And on the TFUL282 tip that the Boston Creme Bitch mentioned upthread - both the Thinking Fellers' _Mother of all Saints_ and Sebadoh's _III_ are fine documents epitomizing the catch-all leave-the-tape-running ethos of whatever the hell you want to call this silliness. _Mother of all Saints_ is more fun (more fun = more wacky instruments), but _III_ is scarier (cf. Eric Gaffney's contribution to the end of the disc - be happy Lou's not singing about jerking off as much as on _The Freed Weed_), and both are all sorts of fucked up. Actually, _III_ really hits a dry patch after song 7 or 8, so you might want to get as fucked up as Lou & Co. were when recording _III_. Please note that TFUL cleaned up a lot nicer than Sebadoh.

And maybe I'll talk about Run On (the band following Fish & Roses) & the Cannanes & This Kind of Punishment & Tsunami's awesome cover of My Dad Is Dead's "Water's Edge" (tho if Baked Bean Teeth DOES come on thread, he could cover the first 3 things I mention in much greater detail - conflict of interest notwithstanding - than I could hope to).

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

so here's a question within a question: what would a vol. 2 of Gimme Indie Rock look like, not using any of the same artists as the first and keeping to an '87-'92 timeframe?

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, when i first started "listening to music" what i heard was "college rock", "modern rock" (barf), and the dreaded "alternative rock". keep in mind that i was in jr high in suburban penn then, so my exposure was limited to spin, 120 minutes, and the occasional older brother/cousin/sister of a friend.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't think i actively heard the phrase "indie rock" until the mid-90s.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm 90% certain "indie rock" as widespread term begins with the Sebadoh 7-inch; before that it was "college rock" or "alternative rock", the latter of which of course became almost unusable thanks to overuse/overkill as early as '93, probably peaking '94

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

(then again i never really had anyone to talk about this shit with until college, since all my HS friends were into hip-hop or the ass-end of grunge.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:02 (twenty-two years ago)

did greil marcus write The Ass-end of Grunge?

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)

was that the elvis/clinton book?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd forgotten about Prisonshake, who I liked a lot; that reminds me of Sister Ray, also from Ohio, who were just as good. And yeah, the Wax Trax stuff (which I hated at the time) could be pretty wonderful, but mainly only if it was from, like, Belgium or Yugoslavia or somehwere. I can also vouch for a bunch of the names Mr. Diamond drops [especially Couch Flambeau, Laughing Hyenas (who knew in Ann Arbor), Sister Ray {hey, I didn't notice he mentioned them!}, My Dad is Dead, Lazy Cowgirls, The Embarassment, the 3Ds (New Zealand I think) Unrest, Clawhammer, The Scene is Now, feedtime (tho they were Aussies), Breaking Circus (first EP), the Neats (ditto) maybe the Dustdevils, maybe Drunks With Guns.] And I'll throw in the Necros and Die Kreuzen and Angry Red Planet and Killdozer and Human Zoo and the Left while I'm at it. (Not to mention, if you wanna go back even further, the Angry Samaons and Red Cross and Flaming Lips when they put out their first and best record in 1984 and....okay, this list could easily go on forever.) But again, most of these bands peaked before 1987. If anything, they just suggest how clueless Azerrad seems to have been about what was great in *earlier* indie rock. He went for careerists, but careererists weren't always the most fun.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)

>>I'm 90% certain "indie rock" as widespread term begins with the Sebadoh 7-inch; before that it was "college rock" or "alternative rock", the latter of which of course became almost unusable thanks to overuse/overkill as early as '93, probably peaking '94 <<<

Again, see what I wrote above. I actually remember that, when Sebedoh and Pavement and Guided By Voices (and Beck!) first came out, we were calling them "Lo-fi", NOT "indie." "Indie" was just way too broad a category to define them. Though for junior high kids, maybe it was.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

that's why i prefer that american hardcore book by steven blush.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Then again, I fucking hated Sebadoh, and still do. So I'm no expert.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)

hey wait, Bunny Brains!!!!

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

>>>hey wait, Bunny Brains!!!! <<<

Yes!!! Go out and buy *Sin Gulls (Goring St. Eddy* and "Bring Me the Head of Trent Reznor (Chuck Eddy Mix)" right this very second!! "On the Floor Again" is probably as good a song as anything by Flipper.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i like neil young as much as the next guy, but this reeks of cheap weed and pizza crust and damp wool ... mind if I open a window & suggest some more clean-living musical combos:

The Milkshakes, The Prisoners, The Mighty Caesars, The Headcoats, Delmonas Five, The Dwarves, Pagans, The Gories, The Mummies, The Devil Dogs, the Cramps, JackKnife, MonkeyWrench, Slant Six, Supersnazz, 68 Comeback, Bassholes, Gibson Bros

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:24 (twenty-two years ago)

The Pagans did all their good stuff between 1977 and 1989, so that's off by ten years at least. (Still, Fritz has a point -- many a half-assed hardcore band pretended to play garage rock in bygone times.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

we are probably forgetting a lot of weirdo basement stuff like mike rep/ron house/siltbreeze/harry pussy/strapping fieldhands/caroliner kinda thing

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Shit! I meant between 1977 and 1979, for the Pagans. (And my math is off, since 1987 minus 1979 equals eight not ten. But who's counting?)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)

but does anyone actually still listen to old original sins records? a show of hands, please.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Superchunk, Bikini Kill, Bratmobile, Velvet Crush... I kind of think Pretty Hate Machine should qualify...

JesseFox (JesseFox), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

This girl got really mad at me once for calling Husker Du indie rock. I sort of understand why now.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I was out of the country from '88-90, and I didn't really start discovering this kind of music until '91, so my knowledge has many gaps. Definitely a key moment for me was my discovery of the Pixies (shortly before they broke up, natch). I'd never heard the bands that I guess they were ripping off, but to me they seemed like the perfect blend of hard-edged guitar, catchy melodies, pretty harmonies, weird and sarcastic lyrics, propulsive energy, and clever songs. I hadn't heard anything exactly like it before. Even now, when I go back to the bands that are usually cited as their influences, such as Husker Du, I can hear similarities, but I don't think I would have been as impressed by those bands, even had I known of them earlier, because they seem to be missing one or more of the key elements that made the Pixies so great.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

who WERE the pixies ripping off? dick dale? carmen miranda?

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

they never sounded like husker du to me.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

>>>weirdo basement stuff<<<

yeah, when did thomas jefferson slave apartment start? i forget. but fritz (who i hope has a sense of humor) did mention the gibson bros., who, while not as good as the disco gibson bros. who did "cuba" in the late '70s, could still be pretty nifty. Anyway, "weirdo basement stuff" makes me think of Vertical Slit aka V3 aka Phantom Limb aka Ohio's late grate Tim Sheppard, who made lower-fi-than-Lou-Barlow's-dreams stuff that actually *rocked,* long before Pavement learned how to muffle bad poetry through broken Burger King drive-thru intercoms (which is the best stuff PAVEMENT would ever do, but i'll shut up.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Vertical Slit

Let me second and third this recommendation.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)

husker du were indie rock at the exact moment that they started sucking so bad.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)

chuck, you hate pavement so much i can smell it from here! tell ned whatcha think of my bloody valentine.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

run on -vs- MBV

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

so much of this stuff is stuff i wouldn't wanna hear in a million years.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I bet I hate Pavement more than he does.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

mmm...i don't know about that.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

What elements DID make the Pixies great? Nobody ever explained that at the time. Me in *Stairway to Hell*: "Easy to see how what passed as a generation found these guys fun; hard to see why anybody found them important." He just sounds like a guy who smoked a lot of pot but couldn't come up with pot hooks as catchy as the Wings or Steve Miller or T. Rex. And if David Thomas was a fat whimsical hippo, Black Francis was just a fat whimsical fly or something, by comparison. (Didn't they also rip off the Cars and Ted Nugent?) And he always had way more boring songs than funny ones, too! What a dork.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought the Pixies were ripping off the Residents and Roger Corman.

Why would someone get mad about calling Husker Du indie rock? What disqualifies them? Or did she think it was an insult to Husker Du, because they were really "punk" or "hardcore" or something?

JesseFox (JesseFox), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)

they were too catchy! yur the one who's high! howz that for a riposte.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

flip yr wig was their last good one, right? then they proceeded to blow for awhile and then they went away. kinda like the placemat trajectory.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Holy testosterone overhaul, Batman. Let's not forget:
L7's two best albums, Smell The Magic and Bricks are Heavy came out in '91 and '92, respectively.
7 Year Bitch released Sick 'Em in '92.
Babes in Toyland (yes, Chuck, I know you hate them) had Spanking Machine in '90 and Fontanelle in '92, as well.
The Breeders had Pod out in '90 (that was on 4AD, though -- does that qualify as indie?)
The Gits had Frenching the Bully in '90
Lunachicks already had two or three albums out by '92.

Okay, I feel better now. Carry on.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

>>>I bet I hate Pavement more than he does.<<<

I'm sure you do; I actually *like* some Pavement stuff. But I bet you don't hate Pavement as much as I hate My Bloody Valentine!

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

What elements DID make the Pixies great?

I listed the elements further up in that 'graph, but I'll repeat them again for clarity: "hard-edged guitar, catchy melodies, pretty harmonies, weird and sarcastic lyrics, propulsive energy, and clever songs". It wouldn't be too hard to pick any one of these elements and go back and find some band that supposedly did it better, but the point is that the Pixies combined them all, and in a way that sounds natural and seamless and makes immediate sense, at least to me.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually most days I'd probably want to listen to MANY of these bands over the WAY OVERRATED MbV (not to say "bad"; I quite like them).

Yeah, I should've listed the Gibsons (and the Billy Childish axis, and the Gories, and Prisonshake, etc.) (oh and Honeymoon Killers and Love Child and Unsane and Antietam and the Mono Men and the Terminals and yeah you can really go on forever with this stuff) (so that's why I missed out on the rave era!)

Other good comps not mentioned were Away From the Pulsebeat's Mondo Stereo and Matador's New York Eye and Ear Control. Actually it's pretty hard to overstate the work Gerard Cosloy did in just documenting all of this shit during his tenure with Homestead. I don't know what the deal is with that label - whether as I suspect it was some kind of tax loss deal for Dutch East India - but the sheer number of releases while he was at the helm really got a lot of the stuff down that would have otherwise gone unrecorded. Much of it was pretty forgettable (ok, a lot of it), but his zeal for the stuff was honorable. Homestead kind of seemed like the Prestige to SST's more insular Blue Note. The Ken Katkin era was OK, but didn't seem as exciting; Cosloy's early Matador continued that feeling of the most vital releases.

Somewhere around here (in the archives, har har) I've got the old Spin column from like '89 or something where Byron Coley lists his 100 best "underground" records of the 80's. I should type it up if I can find it.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)

someone's gotta come up with something better than the cars and ted nugent!! for a precursor to the pixies. i don't know who the hell they sound like except tito puente and the ventures.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess what I'm thinking is if you want an example of early indie rock, just go to your local used lp store and buy any record before 1990 on Homestead. They're should be plenty of them, and they should go for a couple bucks.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

byron probably made me buy one to many rat at rat r-esque records, but i gotta say, he was an invaluable resource for me back then. along with that weirdo who was in to Kix and Will To Power.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

when did the wailing ultimate comp come out? that was a good one.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, she thought it was an insult to Husker Du - they were "melodic hardcore" ("just like Hot Water Music"). "Just because they sound like an indie rock band doesn't make them an indie rock band. Until they went major label - then they were an indie rock band on a major label". She thought they belonged to the hardcore subculture with all its trappings, which was totally separate from, and looked down on, indie rock subculture because it places more emphasis on political involvement etc. Bands from one would never play with the other etc. Indie rock was associated with college rock, which was sort of invented or at least epitomized by Pavement. When I said that Sonic Youth played with somehc bands, she was really sharply sceptical and demanded that I list bands. We argued about this for most of the night. It dragged on afterwards and became a bitter point of contention. I was annoyed by her pettiness and stridency as I saw it and so kept pushing things with increasingly annoying stretching claims and tangential factoids, drawing a comparison between Husker Du and the Smiths, etc. She was even more offended when I said that indie rock was something that came out of punk rock. She was also really adamant that Weezer is the epitome of contemporary indie rock, which had something to do with why I didn't like any of the crappy local bar bands we saw.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Byron gets pigeonholed as a "scumrock" or "pigfuck" evangelist because of the FE connection, but he liked (and wrote about) quite a bit of lighter sounding stuff. Yeah, Rat at Rat R - ye gods. Don't forget Of Cabbages and Kings! Or Head of David, haha. Man I did listen to some crap in those days.

Also, Pixies are just Pere Ubu with all the interesting parts removed.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

This is what I grew up on, pretty much. (Actually--would anyone besides Matos be interested in this?--Lisa and I have thought many times about assembling a several-CD-R series of the best American indie 7"s from this period.) Let's not forget:

Airlines (unbelievable cover of Nick Drake's "Road" as streamlined rock)
High Risk Group (three singles, all of which rip)
Fertile Virgin
Wimp Factor XIV
Buffalo Rome (pre-Magnetic Fields band)
Velocity Girl (those first two singles were AWESOME)
Fire In The Kitchen ("Simple English"!)
Autoclave (plus the first two Helium singles and the EP)  
Wanton Loveboy (does ANYBODY else remember them? two great singles)
The Spinanes (esp. the first four singles)
Baby Tooth (holy God, "Jet Lag"!)  
WCKR SPGT  
the Glands of External Secretion (both singles are killers)

I could go on and on and ON.

Douglas (Douglas), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Were Weezer ever even on an indie label?? That's hilarious.

Pere Ubu and Wings and Steve Miller and the Cars (and T. Rex I guess) all combined hard-edged guitar, catchy melodies, pretty harmonies, weird and sarcastic lyrics, propulsive energy, and clever songs (unless they didn't.) So did Led Zeppelin. So did lots of people.

I think I trashed *New York Eye and Ear Control* in Spin when it came out! Though I vagely remember not hating the Cop Shoot Cop track.

I also think I voted for a Head of David EP in Pazz and Jop once. And I might've even voted for a Greenhouse of Terror EP the same year!

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

>>>Pixies are just Pere Ubu with all the interesting parts removed.<<

Yeah, that's what I meant about the hippo vs. fly comparison.

Just like Guided By Voices are '60s rock with all the interesting parts removed. (That was obviously a major trend in '90s indie.)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, that's what I asked her.

I'm assuming New York Eye and Ear Control is different from the Albert Ayler album?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

>>....hard-edged guitar, catchy melodies, pretty harmonies, weird and sarcastic lyrics, propulsive energy, and clever songs (unless they didn't.) So did Led Zeppelin. So did lots of people.<<

Like Michael Jackson, for instance.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

sundar i had so many conversations like that in college it makes me want to vomit.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

The Pixies, when they were on, have a sort of manic liveliness for me. Like clap-your-hands rock anthems from the POV of someone who's happily demented. And no way were they devoid of hooks. "Alec Eiffel" closes with a melody so classic it should have been thought up centuries ago (maybe it was, I dunno.) "Velouria" is beautiful too.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Pere Ubu and Wings and Steve Miller and the Cars

If you rolled all these bands together, you might have something very close to the Pixies - but before the Pixies existed, no one would have thought to even mention these bands in the same sentence - that's what they accomplished!

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Metal Blade-vs-Earache!!
ak.a. lawnmower deth-vs-fudge tunnel ( wait, they were both on earache)

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

And it doesn't really work for me to say that Michael Jackson or Led Zeppelin did all that too. Of course they fucking did! That's why they were the greatest artists of their respective decades. It doesn't mean that the Pixies didn't also achieve some similar good qualities with their own distinctive stamp on it.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I love the Pixies!! i don't care who knows it!! if anything, they are underrated, as are the wipers, seeing as how kurdt cobain still gets plenty of ink for creating a band that ripped them off wholesale. oh jeez, my arguments have devolved to this. oh, well. and everything after dub housing is a snooze anyhow.
douglas w, you have finally come up with some stuff that i'm curious about.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, I never called them useless, Sundar. I just called them minor.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:37 (twenty-two years ago)

And if my posts on this thread suggest anything, it's that I definitely don't equate being minor with being bad. I have no problem with the Pixies except that the attention they're given tends to overshadow the several hundred indie bands were just as good as them.

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:39 (twenty-two years ago)

but most of them didn't last as long. i think pixies were good from first to last. it's an accomplishment to come up with 5 good records.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)

wait, was it 5? i can't remember.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)

bossanova's not so great

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it was 2 1/2, something like that!

Plus, I never bought Frank Blank's supposed "dementia." And indie fans rate dementia way too high, anyway. But again, that's just me (a guy who probably rates Michael Jackson's dementia way too high!)

chuck, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/pixies.html

i always liked tom's take

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

it was more than 2 and a half! wait what does alex from nyc always say: ENTER THE, UM, FIRE!! THE PIXIES RULE!! BOW BEFORE KIM DEAL, MORTAL!! and then i post a scary picture of frank black going, "GRRRRRRRRRRRRR'!!

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I always thought Bossanova was better than anything else they did.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

everyone supposedly hated the last one but now everyone loves the last one. supposedly.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)

the last one is what ruined them for me. I saw 'em on that tour and Pere Ubu blew 'em off the stage.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess at the time of surfer rosa i compared them to throwing muses cuzza 4ad/boston/screechy singer/herky jerky polka stop start/cowpoke anthems about blood 'n' eyeballs. and my only reference for throwing muses was post punk/herky jerky/x ray spex/buffy st. marie

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)

trompe is the best one

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)

if you know nothing about American indie rock, maybe.

(sorry jess)

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Why is that h? I love Trompe as much as any of the other ones.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:01 (twenty-two years ago)

2 1/2 is spot on. Everything after that was snooze city. Plus only the first 1 1/2 could be called indie. I mean, all the alternative kids in my high school listened to the Pixies circa Doolittle alongside The Cure and Love & Rockets, etc.

Ok, this thread actually made me just pull out Doolittle for the first time in at least 10 years, no joke.

Scott, everything by Ubu up through the original break-up was hot, c'mon man. You're right about the Wipers and Nirvana though, he borrowed a lot. The alienation themes, the curt song structures, the repeated lyrical phrases - you can really hear it in the Nirvana covers of "Return of the Rat" and "D7" - they sound like Nirvana songs! I wish they would have covered "Up Front" too, that's a total Nirvana blueprint.

The funny thing about Nirvana is you see "Smells Like Teen Spirit" on all these critics top singles lists because of its "importance" or whatever, but I could never rank it so high because as a big Nirvana fan it seemed like such a disappointment! It was just them sounding like the Pixies when I wanted them to keep sounding like Led Zeppelin, just like all those other Sub Pop and AmRep bands I dug at the time. I mean, I liked Cobain for his guitar riffs! Not his fucking lyrics and melodies. The other funny thing is that most of these people like Gerard Cosloy and Byron Coley and Baked Bean Teeth hated Sub Pop because it sounded like heavy metal.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:04 (twenty-two years ago)

well I kinda agree with chuck's take on the Pixies i.e. they're what you'd be into if you didn't know much about what else was going on (which was definitely the case when I liked 'em - as soon as I found out about some more interesting bands [most of whom are listed here] I dropped 'em like a hot potato).

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually sorta came into the Pixies after the fact...I knew who they were and all but I didn't really listen to them much until they had broken up. And I still don't listen to them much, but you know, I'll take their singles and songs like "Debaser" over a lot else that was released at the time. They sound...for lack of a better word...fun. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm so with Jess on Trompe it's not even funny, and am exactly opposite of Chuck--I can see how people think the (early) Pixies are important but I get almost no joy at all out of those records, sorry. also, I love how Douglas didn't even have to ask if I wanted a copy of his (and Lisa's) CD-R series.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I was listening to all sorts of stuff when 'Surfer Rosa' came out and I've heard many of the bands listed on this thread and thought Bossanova and Trompe Le Monde equally better than most of them, so it must simply be a matter of taste rather than knowledge.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I think because Bossa Nova sucked so bad I just gave up on 'em. *shrug* I moved on to other, more interesting stuff and couldn't really be bothered to give 'em another chance.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

what exactly are all these "more interesting" bands?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Bossanova is the one album of theirs with any lyrical depth/meaning plus nuanced music. The rest is mostly jokes drawn out to song length with only two guitar defaults ("loud" and "soft"). There was something about Bossanova that struck me, esp. the times I took trains across the desert, that none of their albums came close to doing (even though I liked them at the time).

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Spencer, up thread.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't really listen to them NOW that much, but if i put on one of their records right this minute, i know for a fact it would sound as good or better than a lot of stuff mentioned on this thread. those records hold up.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

but i guess i could just listen to some barbara manning or big dipper albums instead.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Bossa Nova was the first Pixies album that I got, but now it's my least favorite. Maybe I should go back and listen to it. I seem to have misplaced my copy. But I'd say they have three really solid albums: Surfer Rosa, Doolittle, and Trompe Le Monde. Each shows a slightly different side of the band, although I'd have to say that there is less progression from Doolittle to Trompe than there was from Surfer to Doolittle. Trompe kind of sounds like a remake of Doolittle, but a very good remake.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually stecil, I can read, but there are *a lot* of bands upthread. I'm asking which ones specifically. The only groups I like as much as the Pixies are MBV, Galaxie 500, Sonic Youth, and Dinosaur Jr. hasn't been mentioned yet.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean, out of all the bands that fit this thread, how many of them do you still listen to a lot or at all. i mean most of them are just examples, right? i still listen to unrest sometimes.i'm talking about the amerindie bands mentioned, not the kiwi stuff or other tangents.I'm asking this of anybody reading right now.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I listen to all the bands mentioned in my last post "upthread" often.

I'm also thinking that the Pixies should maybe not be included in these American Indie band lists. Their sound is certainly brighter and cleaner than many of those above and they were on 4AD and Elektra, so...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I still listen to a lot of this stuff, esp. the stuff from my hometown as it had a definite impact on me growing up.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i think it's great that people thought great plains or drunks with guns were great, but does anybody actually still listen to them. jeez, i'm not even sure why i care. i'm not a really big stands-the-test-of-time kinda guy, just wondering. now that chuck's gone, were any of these bands as good as MBV? Hah! Ned, it's safe now.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)

well maybe if I was getting free records to trade in for cash I'd think the same way you do, but I don't, so there it is.

TS: Listening to old stuff that "doesn't stand the test of time" VS. Forgetting about something you "LOVED" six months later?

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

were any of these bands as good as MBV?

no.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I listen to Unrest all the time, and often bemoan their lack of acclaim/exposure.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

TS:

TS: Listening to old stuff that "doesn't stand the test of time" VS. Forgetting about something you "LOVED" six months later?

vs.

well I kinda agree with chuck's take on the Pixies i.e. they're what you'd be into if you didn't know much about what else was going on (which was definitely the case when I liked 'em - as soon as I found out about some more interesting bands [most of whom are listed here] I dropped 'em like a hot potato).

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

well, records fit certain moods/ages/times, but i think i brought this up, cuz i kinda forgot all about a lot of these bands and i know for a fact that there is stuff from the same time period that i never stopped listening to. like Prince for instance. do these bands, not the obvious examples maybe, still resonate for people. scrawl? halo of flies? i'm picking at random.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Drunks With Guns were waaaaay better than MBV. I mean, it's apples and oranges, but since you asked....

Do I listen to those other groups? Fuck yes. Just in the past couple weeks I've listened to the Great Unwashed, Jay Clarkson (there's a New Zealand obscurity for you!), the Wipers, and the Jesus Lizard. Hell, I listened to Daydream Nation just last night. They're not "just examples" for me, and I'm sure as hell not planning on selling my records from that era any time soon.

And, like I say, I just listened to Doolittle for the first time in 10 years (or more, hell if I remember). It was pretty much just *there*. It sure as hell didn't move me like the Wipers or any of the New Zealand stuff. Christ what an overrated band. Although that "Silver" song was pretty great. Did they ever end up doing more stuff that sounded like that?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

whereas people have agreed somewhat that pre-87 stuff equals the golden years and eagerly wait in line for mission of burma to show up.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:48 (twenty-two years ago)

gygax! I was in high school then, and yes a lot of that stuff I listened to then I still listen to now because it has staying power, unlike the Pixies (with the exception of Bossanova that I maybe listen to once a year on tape when I'm home). And even still, there's a huge difference as I wasn't getting records for free back then, but spending what little I made in various shitty after-school jobs, so dropping something meant a little bit more.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd rather listen to Halo of Flies than Prince, and I like Prince, so yeah.

hstencil, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:51 (twenty-two years ago)

well, mr. d i was trying to leave non-amerindie out of things, but, yeah, i never ever stopped listening to my clean/chills/staightjacket fits records either. and i listen to the wipers all the time. but they somehow don't count for me since they were around since, like, 1979 or somehthing.i listened to the jesus lizard singles comp a little while back. they were a fave of mine. no, they don't have to be "examples". that's what i wanted to know. whether this stuff is still alive for people.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)

When I went to the WFMU record fair last fall, I was jazzed as fuck to find the first Crawlspace record for $3.

I listened to Urge Overkill's Supersonic Storybook a couple months ago and I couldn't believe how great it sounded. I totally forgot how good those guys could be.

I'd rather listen to Prince than Halo of Flies right now, but I love the latter and you'd have to pry Music for Insect Minds from my etc.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

is there a Great Unwashed comp? i think i need one.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

i think i need to hear some cows right about now.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Personally, as a young, admiitedly ignorant Amerindie kid in high school during the time in question, England seemed to be much more interesting than the US... I still have my attachment to Unrest, the Pixies, a handful of the other bands mentioned up thread. But really, most of these bands (the Wipers? Urge Overkill? Halo of what now?) don't have anywhere near the stature or the "influence" of most of the bands covered by Azzerad, which was the original question. The late 80s were pretty messy for the American underground, I think, a lot of stuff was bubbling (surprised only one person so far mentioned WaxTrax), but things were pretty disparate, small, disengaged... Up until "grunge" I was more focused on Spacemen 3, the Manchester stuff, etc.

Much love to the Cows tho, YES!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, there is a cd, Collection, on Flying Nun which has everything. I could burn it for you (but uh, it may take me a couple weeks as I owe a couple other folks at the moment).

Dope Guns & Fucking, Vol. 1! There's a fucking comp for you.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)

It's kind of funny for me to remember that around this time (1991), when I was first getting into what was, at that time, still usually referred to as "college rock", and attending a boring religious college where no one else seemed to know anything about this type of music, that one of my only sources of information was Spin magazine, which didn't focus exclusively on this kind of music but did cover a fair amount of it, and I remember one reviewer there in particular whom I could never tell if he was shitting me (the reader) or not - he would usually put down the bands that I liked and he seemed to revere these weird, cheesy metal bands that pretty much embodied the kind of thing that I was running away from - but yet he was so confident about his views and he seemed to know so much about music - I couldn't tell if he has really serious or just indulging in some exotic variety of hipster irony. Anyway, by now I'm sure you've guessed who I'm writing about. I just thought I'd share that.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:07 (twenty-two years ago)

that belongs on the thread "how many albums did you buy as a result of reading Stairway To Hell that you only listened to once". i think it was a Lucifer's Friend album and Bob Welch's Paris album for me.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:13 (twenty-two years ago)

the brit thing rings true with me. i graduated from high school in 87 i think. it was supposed to be 86 but i was a hooligan and i did too many drugs. i moved to philadelphia in 88 to get away from my very disappointed parents, and there was so much other stuff music-wise going on there that i had access to that i did just turn away from the whole amerindie thing after having been immersed in it for years along with punk and hardcore and new wave/post punk. i remember being upset that i couldn't get in to see nick cave on his mercy seat tour cuz i was only twenty. that's one indie memory for me. rap and house and dance music and jazz and 60's shit owned me. along with the brit stuff. i'm glad it happened the way it did. i needed to hear different stuff and matador putting out teenage fanclub records wasn't doing it for me.AFTER 92 i caught up with stuff that i had missed. i was late on the amrep bandwagon, but i dug it cuz it reminded me of the tough and go stuff i had left behind.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)

touch and go, obv.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

"I couldn't tell if he has really serious or just indulging in some exotic variety of hipster irony."

I'm kinda waiting (hoping?) for the day chuck and Geir Hongro get in some fantastic FITE. Hopefully their two equally ridiculous viewpoints will somehow obliterate each other in a glorious explosion of misplaced priorities.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

let's active!!

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, there are lots and lots of times when the Wipers are my favorite band, but I can't even imagine anyone listening to anything they did after Over the Edge ('83?) because they wanted to. My favorite indie rock band from '87-'93 is probably Born Against. I'd like to say Infest or Pissed Happy Children or something but that sort of thing was well-bettered in the mid-late '90s.

Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)

uh just briefly popping in to say to anyone looking for Flying Nun stuff - this is the smoke cds flying nun section, which is v. easy to navigate & has pictures/info & stuff (lots of recent reissues - great unwashed, gordons, etc), & is probably pretty cheap in US$.

Ess Kay (esskay), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Although obviously Born Against sounds nothing like 90s indie rock...

Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)

In 1987 I was ten, and during the next five years a lot more interested in the "college" spectrum than the strict Amerindie. In fact, a whole whole lot of bands I like started up around 89/90 and were releasing their first records around the 92/93 cut-off here (e.g. Velocity Girl, Swirlies, Eric's Trip, Unrest starting to sound like "Unrest"). The AMG seems to sort of mark the style shift by dividing between 90s "indie rock" and 80s "American underground" for the sort of stuff that's getting mentioned more here: Meat Puppets, Killdozer, My Dad is Dead, Bongwater, etc. Apart from a lot of jangly stuff (the Feelies, the Athens stuff, etc) I've never been huge on the "American underground" portion; for, say, 82-87 I pretty much like British pop bands.

But for the 87-92 transition I'd take plenty of poppy things: Blake Babies, Beat Happening, first Versus singles, Small Factory, Dinosaur Jr., Minutemen, Dead Milkmen, Jawbox, Antietam, Camper van Beethoven, Throwing Muses, Galaxie 500 and the first Luna, etc. Maybe some Cramps.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i was just listening to Land Of The Lost and The Circle this week!! 1987 and 1988 i believe. I love 'em. and i was listening to Let's Active's Afoot 2 weeks ago!! today i listened to the Godfathers Hit By Hit singles comp. but it's from 86. and they are british. and they used to be the Sid Presley Experience. and i don't think anyone listens to them anymore, but they were better than the vines at least.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i totally forgot to mention the speed trials album! that had a huge effect on me. sonic youth, swans, the fall doing a minimal sludge version of tempo house. even beastie boys are great on that thing.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I wasn't listening to college radio from '87-'92, I was listening to high school radio...and it was all proto-death metal and thrash.

Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

which begs the question,"is any album that has been mentioned here as good as Master Of Puppets or Reign In Blood?"
on that note, gotta go eat.

scott seward, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, hip hop figured rather largely on my radar as well, this was really it's "Golden Age" in many ways: NWA, Public Enemy, Digital Underground, De La/Tribe/Jungle Bros., EPMD, Beasties, so many folks at their peak... then there was the metal, and the British stuff. The American underground didn't really hold my attention very much in this period.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I still own all The Godfathers records! I saw 'em live, too. They were great. Also cue notorious anti-pedant Tracer Hand to correct Scott's usage of "beg the question".

Anyway, that's the thing, Shakey, these bands (Urge, Halo of Flies, The Embarassment, etc) don't have the stature; it never attained stature as most of the lame critics around couldn't give two shits about this scene when it was thriving. They only bothered to learn about American independent rock because they "had" to, in Nirvana's wake. Spin was the only mag really touching the stuff. Mission of Burma and the bands covered by Azerrad certainly had a degree of stature, respect, but certainly wouldn't have had a book written about them by Michael fucking Azerrad without the blasted Nirvana phenomenon. I mean, who the fuck is Michael Azerrad?

I mean there were all sorts of bands in America doing interesting stuff. The Sub Pop stable came along and they try to sound like hoary 70's metal. Personally I loved it, but most of what comprised the indie scene hated that stuff. Then Nirvana blows up and you get dorks like Eric Weisbard and Powers (obviously two tireless documentarians of the late 80's underground American scene) or whoever writing about how "important" and "powerful" rock music was. God was that shit depressing to read. Lit-crit dorks who glommed onto rock music because it made career sense.

I mean, of course I wouldn't expect someone who didn't come of age during this time period to really value these forgotten records; but sorry, I trust someone like say, Spencer Chow's (no offense) opinion ('none of these bands is as good as MBV') on this stuff about as far as I could throw it. That is if he'd actually bothered to hear the majority of the bands mentioned "upthread". He'd just complain that they didn't sound bright or clean or whatever. These groups didn't ask to be judged against the trillion dollar recording budget of MBV. And of course Spencer (or anyone) sure as hell shouldn't trust my opinion on dance music! I mean, I only just bought Todd Terry's To the Batmobile Let's Go last night!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:56 (twenty-two years ago)

oops, wait I meant Gina Arnold not Powers in that post. Although maybe I meant Powers too, I can't even remember if she was around at the time.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I only just bought Todd Terry's To the Batmobile Let's Go last night!

Welcome to my bright, clean, trillion-dollar world!

Also, I was just concerned about the throwing around of "you don't know Indie" stuff which in my case (and certainly in Jess' case) is just not true. And your statement that "That is if he'd actually bothered to hear the majority of the bands mentioned "upthread"," points to a lack of understanding that people have different tastes depending on things other than ignorance.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Spencer, I wasn't trying to insult anybody (and my comment to jess was pretty flippant and shouldn't be taken seriously), but it seems to me that jess wouldn't have started this thread if he wasn't "ignorant" in some sense, i.e. he wants to know more so he asks about it. This is not a bad thing. Also, my "up thread" comment wasn't supposed to flippant either, not nearly as flippant as I perceive comments like "where exactly are all these 'more interesting' bands?" to be. Y'know maybe it IS just taste, but if you're not going to even bother to consider that someone may find a band like Bitch Magnet infinitely more interesting than MBV, well then I don't know why you'd even bother with this thread! I mean, I like MBV fine, but Bitch Magnet have always been far more interesting to me. Obv. that's a minority view, but so what? Are you here to just read opinions that are the same as your own?

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

God, this thread brings me back. There are some ringers in here (Union Carbide Productions were Swedish, essentially Soundtrack of Our Lives with a few minor personnel changes I think,) but there are some bands mentioned here I've not heard in...years. I'd like to shout to those who mentioned Clawhammer, who, on one or two occasions, may have been the greatest live band I've ever seen. Television and the MC5 combined, seriously. Un-fucking-believable. Pity the records never quite caught that.

M Specktor (M Specktor), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

stencil, yeah, I overreacted to your comment to Jess, but I was indeed curious about which bands you liked more than the Pixies because I was going to check them out again. So, Bitch Magnet then?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

for starters, yeah. Ben Hur and Umber are two pretty incredible records.

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Game Theory and Loud Family never get mentioned in lists like this for whatever reason. Both are great and have held up well. Mudhoney should have been mentioned more than once. I'll second the Lazy Cowgirls, who were, with Clawhammer, the two best live bands in the world for a while. The Jeff Dahl Group needs to be mentioned, as does the mighty Celebrity Skin. And I too love Thinking Fellers Union.

dan (dan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)

hi spencer

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 06:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow. This thread brings back such memories. Don't really have much to add that hasn't been debated to death already.

That was the period that I was at (various) art schools, and I was pretty much focused on British music (Or bands that might as well have been British such as Throwing Muses - on an English label) but it was really a goldmine period. Velocity Girl, wow, I loved those early singles to death - my friend played My Forgotten Favorite at a party a few months back and we all started singing along. Truly, a forgotten favourite.

kate, Thursday, 22 May 2003 08:13 (twenty-two years ago)

You know what I just realized? Half of the reason I didn't start in on a lot of these bands had to do with their grotty names. Dag Nasty, Killdozer, Bitch Magnet, Pussy Galore -- I mean, I learned later on that plenty of the sorts of nice-guy pop bands I like fell into this we're-so-grotty naming scheme as well, but I really think that served as a screen for young-me to steer away from the bits I didn't go for.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

the childhood nabisco must've hated fun, then. When I was 12 a lot of the reason I got into these bands was the names. Pussy Galore looks a hell of a lot cooler scrawled on a binder than uh Milli Vanilli or something.

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I remember being sooooooo disappointed when I finally heard Dead Can Dance!

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 22 May 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I knew a hippie who used to wear a Dead Can Dance t-shirt, not realising they weren't anything to do with The Dead. Heh.

kate, Thursday, 22 May 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

No, childhood-Nabisco liked fun (and by "fun" I mean "Heavy D") but was not yet primed for beery collegiate ironic in-joke band-names like "Pork Mattress" and/or "Cracksplitter."

Does anyone want to save me hours of web time and cut up a shortlist of the "American underground"-era bands I would or might like? As mentioned, I always went for the ones that were arty, poppy, post-punky, jangly, Anglophilic, dreamy, slop-rocky, lo-fi, etc. etc. -- not so much the ones leaning in the hardcore, sludgy, grunty, or Sasquatchy directions. But if there are things in that territory I should start with, I'd be happy to. (I have enjoyed a Honeymoon Killers record, I think, and also even an Alice Donut one, although it's possible I'm just mixing them up with Mary's Danish, who I liked better.) Oh, and of course I'd be more interested in which records are actually findable and buyable these days. (Ahem so yes, I'm bound to like Blake Babies / Dinosaur / Camper Van / Let's Active / Galaxie type stuff, but would love to go back to some other things as well -- any particular suggestions?)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

well nabisco it sounds like you wanna hear some college rock not indie rock.

*starts conversation in circle again*

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Let's make it a short circle:

"Ahem so yes, I'm bound to like [college rock] type stuff, but would love to go back to some [indie rock] as well -- any particular suggestions?"

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

do you already own all of the latter-day Unrest stuff, nabisco? or the even more latter-day air miami/olympic death squad/grenadine stuff(which goes beyond the parameters of the thread, but i like to live dangerously). um, you probably do, but if you don't, buy that stuff. you can find it used/cheap on the web.i like that stuff anyway. i even loved mark robinson's last album, canada's green highways i think it was called.

scott seward, Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, Scott, I think I'm pretty well stocked on Robinson -- love the Air Miami record and then Flin-Flon Stuff, have heard ODS and Grenadine and such but never bought any. I haven't heard too much of his solo stuff, though, so I'll check that out.

I should also say, the flexibility of "indie" distinctions is beginning to hurt my brain. I don't at all understand the common line Chuck takes above, that "indie rock" is just "rock on an independent label" -- because that definition makes the term "indie rock" largely pointless (e.g. it means Hanson were briefly indie rockers) simply in order to pretend that there isn't a generally-recognized stylistic thing or common bits of fan-base linking a lot of bands together. (Yes, acknowledging "indie" as a style means fighting forever over what does and does not "count," but it seems lazy to just back down and say "well if it's on an indie label..." -- not to mention that you can have the same what-counts fights about whether a label's really indie and whether the music's really rock.)

I take the college / indie distinction and certainly understand it, although I'd actually venture that what's being called "indie" here was actually a subset of "college." (I.e. add a bunch of British acts, pop, synth-pop, goth, new-wave, 10K Maniacs, and a bad reggae hour, and there's your "college.")

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you like the Connells, nabisco?

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco:

further - surfing pointers EP
further - born under a good sign
further/fluf - she lives by the castle 2

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Like the Connells I've heard; any standout album to look for? (Also why do I always mentally associate them with the Buck Pets?) Never heard Further, but sounds interesting, will look.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

they are all 7"s btw

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

oooh the Buck Pets that's another one!

hahahaha, I don't know why you associate the two. Buck Pets:Replacements::Connells:R.E.M.

I was just kidding about the Connells, too, as I pretty much loathe 'em. They did play a free show in the park by my parents' house once (with Material Issue) and it was funny to watch all the punk rockers show up and mock 'em.

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, I think the eventual problem with the 80s American jangle thing was that by 86 or so it got so traditionalistic; I love the Feelies but their later records always feel like a bore, as do certain Connells-type things. (One problem might be that the "dreamy" production on certain gentle-jangle things now seems dated and not-so-dreamy at all; plus a lot of it just started to sound like sing-song Tom Petty outtakes or something.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

(You'll be happy to hear, Stencil, that I've had occasion to enjoy the Judybats and Material Issue as well. In fact, I've been having that old-man impulse lately where I'm glad people like the Exploding Hearts record but I feel like they need to hear International Pop Overthrow as well.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco,

i am taking quite a few packages to the post on saturday, i can make you a CDR if interested email me.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

A few more that came to mind:
Miracle Legion, Christmas, Screaming Blue Messiahs, Royal Crescent Mob, Fetchin' Bones, Eleventh Dream Day, Slovenly, Tar Babies, Afghan Whigs

FWIW - The ad that Kim deal answered to become the Pixies' bassist - They were looking for someone to do a "Husker Du/ Peter Paul & Mary" thing.

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 22 May 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

>>>I should also say, the flexibility of "indie" distinctions is beginning to hurt my brain. I don't at all understand the common line Chuck takes above, that "indie rock" is just "rock on an independent label" -- because that definition makes the term "indie rock" largely pointless (e.g. it means Hanson were briefly indie rockers) simply in order to pretend that there isn't a generally-recognized stylistic thing or common bits of fan-base linking a lot of bands together. (Yes, acknowledging "indie" as a style means fighting forever over what does and does not "count," but it seems lazy to just back down and say "well if it's on an indie label..." -- not to mention that
you can have the same what-counts fights about whether a label's really indie and whether the music's really rock.)<<<

But what, exactly, do we gain by *limiting* the definition? I've never understood this with heavy metal, either -- Isn't it somehow more objective or whatever to take in ALL working definitions of a genre when determining what a genre's highpoints are, and work from there? Otherwise, you're limiting yourself by the arbitrariness of your defintion. And if, by "indie rock," one just means "the timid grooveless lifeless sexless rock'n''roll-hating tedium that emerged in the wake of Pavement and Sebadoh" (just like if, by "heavy metal," one just means "the grooveless ugly rock'n'roll-hating horror-shtick tedium that emerged in the wake of Iron Maiden or Slayer"), well, pretty much ALL of it sucks. So why SHOULDN'T Hanson's (or Precious Metal's, or Saint Vitus's) rock recordings for indepedent labels count as indie rock? Just because Pixies and Pavement fans never *heard* them, or liked them? Well, what if Pixies and Pavement fans were *wrong*, you know?? I'm not saying they WERE, but it seems to me that we should at least leave open that possibility. (Though I do of course agree that defining "independent label" and "rock" leave open lots of room for argument; they're hardly absolutes. But hey, "room for argument" is a GOOD thing, isn't it? Just because indie rock is polite and scared to fight doesn't mean I should be, you know?)

Back to the Pixies for a second: I read the Tom Ewing piece that Jess linked to way upthread, and enjoyed how he made a case for them (though I want to ask how the hell one KNOWS when they're singing about UFOS; I NEVER understand what that guy's singing about -- all I know is that I like the song about marijuana if you got some gouge away and hate the one about monkeys hitting him in the head or whatever.) Anyway, the one line that pissed me off in Tom's thing was this one: "Nirvana changed everything about how rock bands work." I have no idea what he's talking about. The only thing I can see they changed is that some bands might've had A&R people coming to their shows who didn't have A&R people coming to their shows before. And some hair-metal bands who had fun hair before Nirvana got boring hair (and less catchy melodies) after Nirvana, maybe. Beyond that? Zilch.

Finally (or not): I loved O. Nate's post about me. But I *still* don't get why people thought I was trying to pull one over on them in those old reviews he's referring to. I was EXPLAINING, in SPECIFIC MUSICAL TERMS, why, say, Cinderella or whoever were better than Pavement or whoever. I was serious as a heart attack. And I was right!

Also, Mr. Diamond may or may not be pleased to note that I reviewed Todd Terry's *To the Batmobile Let's Go* in the Voice when it came out (along with S-Express, the Justifed Ancients of Mu Mu, and Coldcut, I think -- proto-mashup music!) And I liked it, I think.

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

chuck is so right about "indie rock" as a genre descriptive it aint even funny.

also, again, chuck, it was JIM Shepard, not TIm.

misc: 1)never got Pixies-mania myself. some OK songs, lousy as fuck live. 2)Great Plains were a great band. Love their stuff. Ron House was and still is the Man. 3)never got slintmania either -- just left me blah, and didnt really care for a lot of the bands supposedly influenced by them 4)chuck eddy talking about cinderella -- that's the chuck I know love. ;-)

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 22 May 2003 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Chuck, I find it patently weird that you think using "indie" as a style term is more "limiting" than using it as an economic term. (I'd venture that that's the exact opposite of the truth, actually.) But nevermind: what's important to me is the usefulness of the word, which I think the economic approach completely destroys -- you say you want to broaden the range of things that people can pick up in a s/d like this one, but by saying "anything on an indie label" you're broadening it in an almost meaningless direction, like saying "search and destroy: bands with the letter M in their names." If we're going to use descriptive terms about music they're going to serve as filters, and surely they should filter for something as meaningful as possible. And surely they should relate to the way people actually use the terms: when people say they enjoy "indie rock" they are without doubt talking about a particular, if horribly vague, genre or sub-genre or area of music, one they're mentally tying together along the lines of aesthetics, and not what label something was released on. The bulk of people listening to music barely even notice what label something was released on.

I mean, the sense I get here is that you're just politicizing the issue: you don't like the way the gatekeepers of what "indie" means have set it up. And in this sense I'd completely agree with you -- the idea of "indie" as a style is constantly used to make all sorts of irrational distinctions between things, to ignore things that probably shouldn't be ignored, etc. But this focus on the label as independent or not seems, in that respect, maybe a little cowardly, because its solution to that problem is just to pull the rug out entirely, reduce the gatekeepers keys to complete meaninglessness, and kill off the word's utility rather than bothering to bend it into something you find meaningful. I don't see anything wrong with letting "indie" as a style term be one of those words, like "punk" or "metal," that people are forever arguing with one another to define and redefine. Yeah, that argument can be tedious -- and looking at the label certainly establishes a concrete rule and shuts that tedious argument up forever. But it does so by jacking everything up to oblivion -- by saying that an early Sonic Youth record is better considered in a field with Hanson's early work than it is alongside Daydream Nation. Clever as an argumentative tool, useless to the way people actually listen to and think about music.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Start over, on the premise that "indie" means "created independently" (i.e. D.I.Y.) rather than "manufactured & distributed independently." In other words, Indie can mean the band's work ethic instead of the label's SEC filing status.

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

"Hi, Mr. Schwab, I'd like 100 shares in Matador please"

how could these lyrics not be about UFOs:

they got a ranch they call
number fifty-one
they got a ranch they call
number fifty-one
can't see it all
'less your flying by

just sitting there square
baking in the sun
beneath the sky

they're gonna put it down
right on the strip
they're gonna put it down
on the Vegas strip
they're gonna put it down
and step outside
into the lights
right outta that ship

saying Hi!

i was driving doing nothing on the shores of Great Salt Lake
when they put it on the air i put it in the hammer lane
i soon forgot myeslf and i forgot about the brake
i forgot all laws and i forgot about the rain
they were talking on the 9 and all across the amy band
across the road they were turning around and headed south with me
it got so crowded on the road i started driving in the sand
my head was feeling scared but my heart was feeling free
the desert turned to mud it seems that everybody heard
everybody was remembering to forget they had the chills
then i heard the voices on a broadcast from up on the bird
they were getting interviewed by some Goodman whose name was Bill
i'm almost there to Vegas where they're puttin' on a show
they've come so far i've lived this long at least i must just go and say
hello

hstencil, Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

That's still not a very specific criteria, musically speaking! That criterion encompasses bits of so many different genres that it winds up having very little relation to any field of interest that people engaging with the music actually have. It's a valid distinction to make, and occasionally one worth pointing out, but geez: I stand by my sense that the attempt here is to nuke "indie" as a word to keep it out of the hands of those who use it to advance different politics.

I mean, when it comes down to it, for me: we all trust our ears and our brains to make sonic distinctions between nearly every other genre, ones that have nothing to do with weird hard-and-fast rules about how the records were created. Beyond that: we're content to have our ears and brains understand that there are overlaps and gray areas -- that Tom is "garage" but also kinda "psychedelic," that Dick is more "hardcore" than "emo-core," that Harry combines elements of grindcore and Southern blahblah. No matter how fun the rug-pulling is, surely we can all accept that there are a few central and particular sounds that have happened in American rock of the past two decades that constitute different forms of something we can safely call "indie rock," and name them as such. (Even the indie gatekeepers manage to do this, within their little realm: "slowcore" isn't defined as "something released on Vernon Yard" -- it is, like any genre or sub-genre term, a way of describing a particular semi-nebulous thing that nonetheless has enough shape and significance that it's handy to stick a label on it and save yourself time.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Ahh, unless the other agenda is to make indie bands finally accept that most of them are really just plain normal rock bands, which is probably a worthwhile thing. But as it stands, we have names for plenty of indie-rock subgenres and variants but there's nothing much to describe the plumb-average M.O.R. circa-1992 independent rock band, stylistically, except "that's an indie-rock band." And whether you love or hate that stuff, it probably deserves to be called something, cause there was quite a lot of it.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, nabisco, maybe the problem, then, is with the vagueness and ambiguity of the term itself. In which case, why not use a DIFFERENT FUCKING TERM? (Like, say, "lo-fi", which unlike "indie rock" at least says something about how the music SOUNDS -- nobody commented on my post about that one at all!) I mean, the WAY people used the term "indie rock" in the '90s wasn't the same as the way people used it in the '80s. (Just like the way people used the term "heavy metal" has changed over time.) But it seems stupid and arbitrary to me to assume that the later definition is the *only* right one. (And if indie rock didn't exist until after the Pixies or Sebadoh or Pavement, as a number of people on this thread have suggested, that would eliminate both *Confusion is Sex* AND *Daydream Nation,* wouldn't it?) Anyway, if we're talking about a certain arsty white-people-with-guitars post-punk/post-new-wave/post-hardcore tradition here, which I don't necessarily have a problem with (and which *would* exclude Hanson, probably, though maybe not Precious Metal or Saint Vitus, who recorded for Celebrity Skin's label and Black Flag's label respectively -- okay, maybe it'd elimate Precious Metal, fine), I guess I still don't see what the problem is. I mean, I'm not the one who nominated Hanson in the first place; fuck 'em, okay? But to say only indie rock after 1993 deserves the title indie rock makes no sense to me at all. It's like erasing history and pretending the words "indie" and "rock" don't mean anything, not to mention pretending that Pavement's and the Pixies' audiences and stylistic aesthetics had no direct connection to Big Black's and the Meat Puppets' audiences and stylistic aesthetics. Which is either a huge delusion or just plain stupid, take your pick.

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

has anyone mentioned the goo goo dolls yet?

jess, you should search their 97-02 records. on METAL BLADE oh yes.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

The term "indie rock" has become its own unique term; although it's of course related to the meanings of the words "indie" and "rock," I don't think it's fair to say its meaning is just a composite of those two meanings. It seems like you're just stubbornly ignoring the way people actually *use* the term.

Clarke B., Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Chuck, it *is* stupid to pretend that those artists we call "indie rock" have no connection to those earlier artists you mention -- that doesn't mean we have to force our terminology to reveal social/historical/economic connections, though.

Clarke B., Thursday, 22 May 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Chuck, I may not be being clear here. I for one have at no point said that indie rock "did not exist" until a given point or anything of the sort. And I haven't said anything about any genre being the "right" or "only" relevant part of independent rock. (Is the accusation just a confirmation of what I was saying before -- that the point of your nuking the word seems to be to keep people from privileging it?) All I've said, as Clarke repeats, is that yes, there's a specific type of after-punk guitar music that people are talking about when they say "indie." It's a thing that shifts around according to the politics of the moment and who's talking, and it's barely a fraction of the sum total of independent-in-nature music that's made in various genres, but people know what it means when they say it or hear it. I'm now completely lost as to exactly how we disagree, now that you've said I'm "pretending that Pavement's and the Pixies' audiences and stylistic aesthetics had no direct connection to Big Black's and the Meat Puppets' audiences and stylistic aesthetics" -- the way most people use the word "indie" pretty much encompasses all four of those bands and then makes further distinctions between them. It does not include Hanson or MC Hammer selling tapes out of his trunk; it does not include DIY guitar bands that play what we usually call "metal" or for that matter "blues" or anything else.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, basically I don't see what's wrong with acknowledging the existence of "independent music" and within that "independent rock" and within that this particular thing people refer to as "indie rock" -- the last of those mostly associated with Replacements-through-Pavement or whatever but certainly encompassing a lot more. That's the way it is to me and -- it seems -- to lots of people: independent rock = "rock music created independently in a DIY fashion etc. etc." and indie rock = "a particular lineage / sound that developed within the larger field of 'independent rock' and seemed to deserve some sort of name."

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)

everyone should do what i do, it's much easier: if something sounds like Pavement, i call it pavement rock. if it sounds like Big Black, i call it big black rock. if it sounds like Burl Ives, i call it big rock candy mountain rock. if it sounds like Led Zep, i call it misty mountain hop rock. if it sounds big and empty, i call it bob rock. if it sounds like Disco Tex, i call it monte rock. not to be confused with something that sounds like Nelson Eddy, that's mountie rock. stuff that sounds like Chuck Eddy is chuck rock. or cranky rock, i haven't decided. but that would be to close to stuff that sounds like it should be on Kranky:kranky rock. see, much easier.

scott seward, Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, Scott really said it better (and less crankily) than I've been saying it - My main problem with the phrase "indie rock" (as used by people in print, especially) is that it reveals and incredible lack of imagination. It's just plain LAZY. But then, I think that about LOTS of genre names. (And at least it's not as idiotic as "nu-metal".)

And in general, my problem with people pretending that unfluid borders exist around genres, ANY genres, is that doing so ignores the grey areas and ambiguities that make genres so fun. This is sort of an obsession of mine, actually. I even wrote a book about it once!

Plus, the Goo Goo Dolls (who sounded like the Replacements) DID put out albums on Metal Blade. And the Gibson Bros. were a blues band.

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

97-02 = 87-92 help me!!!

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I wrote TWO books about it.

And though I'm crankier than Scott, he's krankier than me.

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay then, this is definitely one of those not-arguing-the-same-thing problems. The whole reason I bother defending the term "indie rock" is precisely because I think it admits to fluid borders and gray areas -- being, as it is, shorthand for a nebulous "lineage" full of a lot of variations and united mostly just by having a certain fan-base that pays attention to it. It might be sort of a self-perpetuating umbrella but it strikes me as a useful one, or at least a decent way of acknowledging the fact that, you know, there actually is some overarching thing that ties the Cramps to Galaxie 500, and it doesn't quite lie either in the way they sound or the level of indepedence in their process.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)

(In other words, the reason I made the remark to Chuck that sort of started this off is that when people say "indie is about the process / label, it's not a style thing," it negates the thing I most like about indie, which is that it can exist even as this really broad thread / lineage / style with a lot of different facets. I guess the question, though, is this: is the "indie" umbrella a real actual thing, some unifying element that actually makes these bands go together? Or is it just a grab-bag of acts "indie" fans have decided, for sometimes-arbitrary reasons, to like? Chuck's pushing for the inclusion of shadow independent bands seems to hinge on the idea that it's the latter, and that by framing the term differently, people will be forced to confront a wider variety of music. I think I think it's the former, at least in some significant part.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Bloomington Rock (the Gizmos, Panics, Jetsons, Zero Boys, MX-80 Sound) was always better than Indy Rock anyway. So was Seymour Rock, as in John Cougar Mellencamp (at least through *Lonesome Jubilee*). (On the other hand, that one Indy Rock Beach Boys number about the girl who makes the Indy 500 look like a Roman Chariot race now was always pretty great, I admit. There are exceptions to everything!)

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

the former Bloomington, Indiana resident in me loves that last post.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey - is this back on??

Heh Chuck, one reason - besides just generally filling in gaps in my dance collection - I'd been looking for the Todd Terry thing was reading some of Kogan's posting around here got me looking back at old Spins for some of his writing, and I had one where he reviewed it. He sort of talks about how the music doesn't work in album form (I disagree - this thing is GREAT! And I found the cd for $2!). The same issue has a basically laudatory review of Britney Fox that I was sure would be by you, but it was by Rob Sheffield.

Hey, I think Motley Crue's Too Fast For Love and Guns N' Roses Live Like A Suicide are a couple of the greatest indie rock records ever! Ok, yeah, that sounds disingenuous, but it just points out the mutation of the word "indie"; I'm sure if you looked up contemporaneous reviews of GNR's Lies they would say like "packages GNR's indie debut with new acoustic material." But I mean, did GNR really have different aesthetic or political aims than Green River? No one would balk at calling Green River's records indie rock. ANd they were big and dumb and loud and more or less stepping stones on the way to Pearl Jam or whatever.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

MX-80 Sound, at least, was great. And these days they have Dave Fischoff. (Chuck, would I be wrong in guessing you'd like the Panoply Academy bands?)

Oh, sorry, one last "indie" thing that's finally made me figure out where I stand on this: the Postal Service. I guess I'd pretty much agree with Scott's way of putting things -- I'm sure if any of us were writing about this record, we'd say that it involved one guy with an IDM project collaborating with the singer from a chimy guitar-pop band to make an electronic pop record. This would be true and right and probably the most accurate way to approach it, musically speaking. But it would leave out the fuzzy cardigans and the fact that the Postal Service pretty much comes from and is pointed back at a particular socially-constructed "indie" massive -- it's slightly more likely to wind up with people who own more Pavement records than Human League or Oval ones -- and it's basically that fact that I think keeps the term meaningful.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

That Sheffield review of Britny Fox is an all-time classic. He says it looked like they had Kajagoogoo hidden in their hair! And there were some hilarious lines about walking past a girl's school, too.

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

>> would I be wrong in guessing you'd like the Panoply Academy bands?<

I only ever heard one record, *No Dead Time* by the Panoply Academy Legionairres. And yup, I kept it, so I *must* like it! I forget what it sounds like off hand, though. Didn't even know they were from Bloomington (until just this second, when I checked allmusic.com).

chuck, Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Nabisco -- Please file: Rachel's.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)

(Eh, sorry for being elusive. I don't have the patience right now to elaborate; I'm just wondering if that's the same kind of thing as yr Postal Service example. In brief: How important is demographics of both audience and artist [what kind of musical background are they coming out of?] to be classified?)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Christ how could I forget to mention - since we're talking MX-80 - that issue of Spin also had a VERY smart review of Debbie Gibson's Electric Youth by Rich Stim! Does Stim write anymore?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah yeah J: Rachel's is just the sort of thing I mean. Like, there's a sense in which it would be "right and true" to think of them as a modern chamber group with leanings toward rock music and etc etc but surely there's nothing wrong with noting that they function in and collect some of their leanings from a different context, and that context is the thing we call ________.

And someone could ask: if another trio made the exact same records Rachel's did, but in a conservatory context and for classical audiences, why would that be in a different genre? But the difference, I think, is that those records probably wouldn't have been made or enjoyed in a different context. The word ______ is doing some work somewhere in there.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 22 May 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Were Dow Jones & the Industrials from Bloomington?

Kris (aqueduct), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Plus, the Goo Goo Dolls (who sounded like the Replacements) DID put out albums on Metal Blade

And not only that, I always thought they were better than the Replacements anyway. *retreats from everyone's ire*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

No ones yet mentioned:
Giant Sand
Rain Parade
Killdozer
Pitchblende
The Dijits
Savage Republic

brg30 (brg30), Thursday, 22 May 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

HEY JESS!

Does any of this help w/ your inquiry?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

229 posts, and no Das Damen!

*Frown*!

Sam J. (samjeff), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, dow jones was. check out SynthPunk

jack cole (jackcole), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

whoops. wrong url. go here instead.

jack cole (jackcole), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I know two DJ&I songs -- one of which is definitely not synthpunk of any sort and one which is only because it sounds like Devo ("Ladies With Appliances"). There is another Indiana band from the period called Last 4 Digits that I'm curious about because they seem to be named after a Screamers song, but I've never heard them. Anyone know?

Kris (aqueduct), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way, I was listening to Unrest's Malcolm X Park a few weeks ago, and thinking about how it is (for me) the quintessential indie rock album: it's funny; eclectic; creative; full of youthful "let's try this!' energy; saturated with a mysterious, "in-jokey" atmosphere, in a way that makes the people behind it seem clever and interesting and cool (i.e. it's not "pretentious"); produced by Kramer; and packed with amazing, leap-around songs built on stunningly great riffs.

It's not even my favorite Unrest LP (that would be the much less "eclectic" Kustom Karnal Blackxploitation) - but if someone asked me to define indie rock in 40 minutes, I'd play Malcolm X Park.

Sam J. (samjeff), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

where the hell were the Lucy Show from?
Scruffy The Cat were from Boston, right?
What's Don Dixon up to?
Hanson fans would have no fucking idea what i was talking about.
Mitch Easter-vs-Ivo Watts-Russell
Okay, i'll stop now.

i do like how jess started this thing and then ran like hell.
what was he listening to from 1987 to 1992 anyway?

scott seward, Friday, 23 May 2003 02:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, Scott, uh I'm sure Jess didn't "run like hell". Jess is the best young writer on ILM, no joke. The guy has insights, he knows music - he doesn't have to run from ANYONE around this place. His technicolor blog was kicking ass, but I guess his mind is elsewhere right now.

Hstencil made a stupid-ass comment to him. Ok, now everyone can come along and say I made a stupid-ass comment to Spencer. I tried to clarify that I surely wasn't attacking Spencer; obv opinions are opinions! anyway, I just thought his invoking of names like Dinosaur, G500, Sonic Youth and the Pixies represented a kind of gloss on this era and its ethos (I mean, 3/4 of those bands went on to general corporate alt-rock status; not knee-jerk dismissing major labels here, just pointing out that the thread ostensibly concerned the independent faction). I just think that quite frankly anyone who really investigated and enjoyed this particular era of American rock in any kind of depth wouldn't have come up with that particular list.

Anyway, it's embematic of the way history is written that Jess felt compelled to start the thread - and god bless him for doing so! I mean, fuck, 99% of young writers coming up today wouldn't give two shits about discovering exactly who the hell Clawhammer or Slovenly were or what the heck their whole deal was. It just shows how conscientious Jess is about his passion and his work as a writer to want to investigate this largely written-out period.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 23 May 2003 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey Mr. D., as stated upthread, that comment to jess was in jest, based on joking around with 1. the entire idea of this thread (i.e. jess wants to know more about music he's unfamiliar with) and 2. our history of fucking with each other on ILM. I don't think he took it seriously, and it was never my intention for the comment to be taken seriously. For the record, I think jess is a great writer, even if I disagree with what he's saying at times.

hstencil, Friday, 23 May 2003 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, ya know, i was just kidding too. i just meant that he started it (looking for suggestions) and then look what happened!! it turned into one of those frankenstein monster threads that are really my favorite kind on ilm even if i'm just reading them. i have really been enjoying the overacademic bullshit one as well.

scott seward, Friday, 23 May 2003 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)

plus, i love when chuck gets cranky. it's always worth the price of admission. actually, come to think of it, i like when jess gets cranky too! he's funny as all get out.

scott seward, Friday, 23 May 2003 04:13 (twenty-two years ago)

i love this thread! i'm not avoiding it, really, my brain is just toally wiped this week. keep it coming kids!

(scott between 1987 and 1992 my favorite bands/records were public enemy, g'n'r, the batman soundtrack, and various and sundry weird al cassettes.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 23 May 2003 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)

sounds like a good mix-tape to me. all complete freaks by the way. but i think i found where you were hanging. talking about all that arty-farty stuff with sasha and the gang. it's cool. it's cool. we'll be over here debating the relative merits of Phantom Tollbooth b-sides if you need anything.

scott seward, Friday, 23 May 2003 04:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Mr D., I don't think those bands are merely a gloss. Those were my favorite bands of the period, they appealed to me *deeply* and not just because I was force fed them. I'm not going to up the ante on the indie-er than thou sweepstakes, but I've heard tracks from most of the acts mentioned on this page and I still return to said favorites. To me, many of the artists mentioned above just didn't have the sound that I craved. If my favorite bands made prettier or more polished sounds than the others, then perhaps that's just my taste again - also, it might help to explain my tastes if I mention that all of my rawk hinges around my love of the Jesus and Mary Chain. Additionally, it might help to note that I have virtually no interest in the 'ethos' of indie, though I do agree that Sonic Youth mostly sucked after Daydream Nation. I'm also wondering if the Amer-indie types here were also listening to British indie?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 May 2003 06:40 (twenty-two years ago)

personally, never really got into much english stuff until a little bit later, mostly because of preconceptions created by 120 Minutes and being oversaturated by stuff in high school like the Cure and Depeche Mode, etc which drove me up a wall. the first UK band i really connected with was the buzzcocks, or more specifically, singles going steady and then the fall. i mean i like plenty o' english stuff today, but 'merica still rules the roost in my records.

jack cole (jackcole), Friday, 23 May 2003 06:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I like how Jess is now a "young writer". Somehow, it makes him seem like meat: "sir, have you tried the succulent young writer this evening?"

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 May 2003 06:57 (twenty-two years ago)

[must...not...link...Gigolo Jess Gigolo Jess (not quite work safe)...]

oops

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 23 May 2003 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)

that "fucker" jess!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 23 May 2003 08:11 (twenty-two years ago)

To me, the era in question was all about being IN (as opposed to into) bands.

That said, the Mommyheads (before they tried to figure out a way to turn the inappropriate Phish comparisons into cash).

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 23 May 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Search: Sub Pop's The Grunge Years (came out in '94, but it's a comp of singles from the late '80s/early '90s). I really love the Afghan Whigs track, and I'm not usually a fan of theirs.

1. Dive performed by Nirvana
2. Shove performed by L7
3. Stumblin' Man performed by Tad
4. Red Head Walking performed by Beat Happening
5. Ugly Sunday performed by Mark Lanegan
6. Change Has Come performed by Screaming Trees
7. Tomorrow performed by Fluid
8. Retarded performed by Afghan Whigs
9. House performed by Babes In Toyland
10. Come to Mind performed by Mudhoney
11. Long Black Veil performed by Walkabouts
12. Between the Eyes performed by Love Battery
13. Saddle Tramp performed by Dickless

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 23 May 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)

They wear more ruffles than Spandau Ballet ever did, and lead singer "Dizzy" Dean Davidson sports a coif in which Kajagoogoo have been hiding since 1984. Their big Dial MTV hit is "Girlschool," a heartfelt ode to women's higher education, and its guitar-crazed chorus slaps your synapses, even after nine repetitions. "Dizzy" Dean's upper-register vocal trickles down like ice as he shrieks, "Literal - that ain't no way to live/Feminist discourse should be figurative." Or something like that.
--Rob Sheffield, review of Britny Fox's Britny Fox, Columbia. Spin April 1989.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 23 May 2003 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)

That Todd Terry review may be the most boring thing I ever wrote for Spin, though I'm going to recycle its ideas for a possibly equally boring review of Triple Threat that I'm working on for the Voice. It does have one OK line though:

The best way to "listen" to this is to dance to it - you can change your steps, add a body move, etc., with each entrance and exit of a rhythm pattern, each change in timbre, which gives you something to do while your partner is staring off into space.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 23 May 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but Frank do you still feel the same way about that record?

That, you know, you struggled with its use-value?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 24 May 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

That Sheffield review was fucking fantastic writing.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 24 May 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)

God, Spin used to be so great.

Oh well.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 24 May 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Why does Chuck Eddy seem to like the new Malkmus but not like old Pavement? I guess he's just being Chuck...

Steve Kiviat (Steve K), Saturday, 24 May 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I love the old Pavement but hate the new Malkmus - they're very records.

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 24 May 2003 05:44 (twenty-two years ago)

They played "Girlschool" on the Power Hour tonight!

sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 24 May 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)

>>Why does Chuck Eddy seem to like the new Malkmus but not like old Pavement? I guess he's just being Chuck... <<

I think Malkmus finally found some semblance of a rhythm section, for one thing (with the emphasis on "semblance," but still.) Plus, I think Malkmus and I, by some coincidence, are both sorta going through simultaneous Wishone Ash/*Kiln House*/Procul/Lizzy/Fairport aging-white-guy rural-prog nostalgia periods right now, which helps.

Basically, though, I just think the new album feels WARMER than he usually has before. (Though, by the way, it's not like I never liked old Pavement at all; I was actually a *fan* of their early singing through fast food intercom EPs -- after that, I kind of couldn't figure out what their point was. And live, they seemed to have as much contempt for their audience as any band I've ever seen. On the other hand, heh heh, I kinda had contempt for their audience TOO, now and then! So maybe I shouldn't have minded. And some of those Jim Croce melodies they stole could be extremely pretty -- I admit it!)

So yeah, I was just being Chuck. (Whatever that means.)

chuck, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)

"So yeah, I was just being Chuck. (Whatever that means.)"

I was just referring to the notion that you appear to me to enjoy going against any indie/alternative whatever consensus. While there are a number of writers who dislike Pavement, I think alot more loved Slanted and Enchanted, and Crooked Rain Crooked Rain (and even those earlier efforts you referred to)--and still find them more distinctive then Malkmus' current release (I know I like those 2 albums more then his current "rural-prog nostalgia" effort). Upstring you talk about when you got into Stacey Q, and I recall discussing this with you and Frank Kogan and others in the Why Music Sucks zine way back when. I was touching on the whole idea of you going from once writing about Forced Exposure fanzine type stuff for the Voice to writing about Stacey Q, and the whole concept of liking or rejecting music in part because it was associated or not with a certain 'alternative'(whatever that meant or means) sensibility. But you like what you like, and I like what I like and while I think you may like to rile up certain indie/alternative/whatever types, it sounds like you (also?)just find the Malkmus effort "warmer".

Steve Kiviat (Steve K), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

But Steve, why couldn't you just consider that, in the late '80s, I thought indie rock (or whatever you wanna call it) had gotten WORSE? That it didn't SOUND as good? That it had stopped rocking, and turned tepid, and was becoming more and more scared to dance, and that its singers were getting blander and blander, and that even the stuff that had ONCE made it seem interesting to me wasn't so interesting anymore, because the music was just going through the same motions over and over again, and so it didn't sound as NEW as it had? Or at least that it didn't sound as interesting as the pop stuff I was spending more time investigating? Which is what I wrote! (And what I mostly still believe, though in retrospect I doubt that either the pop stuff had gotten so much better or the indie stuff so much worse in the late '80s; I'm just saying it SEEMED to, to me, then.) Why was it so obvious to you that I was just fighting a supposed "concensus" or "sensibility"? Can you cite any specific instances where I WROTE that? Why not take issue with what I wrote, instead of reducing my opinions to assumptions you projected on to them? I really wanna know!

chuck, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

no way chuck, indie is ALWAYS better than anything else, no way there can fluctuations in quality

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Alright Chuck, fine you believe that indie-rock got worse in the late '80s and that's why you started reviewing pop stuff and I was wrongly projecting assumptions onto your writing. I'm no indie purist but I believe there were a few good indie-rock records in the late 80s and early '90s even while times were generally bad musically in the indie-rock area. I also don't believe Pavement's S and E or Crooked Rain cds fit into the "tepid" "bland" rut that you speak of, and in fact I find them more energetic,and more full of catchy melodies(borrowed or not) than Malkmus' current Pig Lib. I also think that Crooked Rain will end up having received a greater percentage of votes in the Pazz & Jop poll for that year then Malkmus alone will get for the next one. I also think you like "Wishbone Ash/*Kiln House*/Procul/Lizzy/Fairport aging-white-guy rural-prog nostalgia" more than many including me. Some would probably say we're both wasting our time with rock music and should be just listening to techno or something...

Steve Kiviat (Steve K), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 01:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Steve if the Pazz and Jop had anything to do with actual "quality" then the universe would explode or something.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)

The last two Malkmus records are freaking leagues better than Pavement for a ton of reasons and none of 'em have to do with just wanting to be contrary. For me a big point is that lyrically he actually seems to be doing something with narrative rather than just showing off his 20th-century American poetry credentials. But there's much more to it than that. The Jicks are a better band than Pavement. Etc.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I still haven't heard the Malkmus solo stuff -- no real interest, really -- but I'm guessing John D is spot on and then some.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I find that the Jicks ability to noodle around more, combined with Malkmus' interest in quirkier time patterns hurts rather then helps. It's too self-indulgent for me. I'm all for musicians developing better chops but as punk and hiphop have long shown, it's how you use them that counts.

Sterling, The pazz & jopp thing may be no be/all end all re: quality but what is? Sales? NME's chart? Rolling Stone magazine's interpretation? The Wire? Simon Reynolds? The amount of bootlegs sold on street corners? ILX contributors? MTV? So, ok, whether or not Pazz & joppers or whomever agree, I still find Crooked Rain more satisfying aesthetically then Malkmus' latest.


Steve Kiviat (Steve K), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i really liked Pavement's first record and then i never listened to them again until my brother told me to pick up their last album which i really liked as well so i went and picked up their other stuff and i thought that stuff was cool also. i found them to be a perfectly pleasant rock and roll band. but i don't really care about lyrics. the stuff that the dude was singing seemed to fit the music okay. do people hate them cuz they were worshipped by critics? i never saw them live so i never felt their contempt. i know they have tons of fans in the u.k. just like the pixies did!! if chuck sez that he hates grandaddy and lambchop and the fun lovin' criminals then we will know that he is a hater of u.s. bands beloved by brits(U.S.B.B.B.B.)

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw LOTS of great Pavement shows--after seeing that horrible, infuriating piece of shit DVD I can understand why people thought they sucked live, but I never saw them do that. and I like all their records a lot except Terror Twilight, and love the first Malkmus solo as well. I do not like Pig Lib because rhythm section or no there are NO SONGS, and chops or no the guitar playing is boring as fuck. I'm a longtime fan of Malkmus's guitar playing, too, so this is extra disappointing to me.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Chuck said that he liked the new Grandaddy record (see here).

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i didn't care for the first solo record that much. didn't thrill me or anything. it was a helluva lot better than that album the other dude put out which was horrible. although it got good reviews in the u.k. yeah, chuck likes the white stripes too, so that blows my u.s.b.b.b.b. theory anyhow.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)

terror twilight! yeah, i really liked it. but that was the first one i had heard since their debut so i wasn't expecting anything. i thought it sounded cool and i really enjoyed the rural-prog guitar jams on that one.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I never understood why people hate Terror Twilight, it's a much better record than Brighten the Corners (although that's not awful, either). Don't understand why people say Pavement wasn't good live, either. I saw them at least 10 times and had a good time at every show.

hstencil, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I never understood why people hate Terror Twilight

Two words : Nigel Godrich

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

two more words: rural prog

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

he may be full of himself or something, but isn't he mostly known for radiohead? those albums sound really cool to me. and terror twilight sounds fins as well. people hated the production on sea change, is that it? again, i thought that the production on that album made the songs sound better than they probably had a right to.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm w/you on that re: Sea Change, Scott, but not w/the rest. There's something really airless about his production style, it's like watching a movie shot through a sepiatoned lens that makes you notice the sepiatone rather than the movie.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

eh, the Godrich touch isn't that apparent on Terror Twilight. And I like rural prog, Matos. Hate on Pentangle or Incredible String Band or whatever all you want, I'd rather listen to that stuff than yet another generic indie rock band.

hstencil, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Argus by Wishbone Ash is great! i would include Glass Harp too in the rural prog category. great stuff. the first 3 thin lizzy albums kinda fit as well. that first thin lizzy album is one of the most beautiful things i have ever heard. plus, all that great early 70's Harvest stuff. Roy Harper alone! not to mention some of those john martyn albums.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Matos, do you like the radiohead stuff on it's own, though. i mean do like the songs/seen them live? i'm kinda wondering what their stuff would have sounded like without the guy. i mean he did the bends on up right? they may owe him more than we know.

Scott Seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean their first album kinda sucked as i remember except for creep. then that guy came along and they got all weird and dreamy. i thought kid a sounded great. i still haven't heard the one after. i'm curious about the new one though.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, anyway, Scott, I do indeed like Fun Lovin Criminals (or at least their fun-lovinly-criminally underrated hit "Scooby Snacks" and second LP *100% Colombian*, anyway). I like 'em LOTS more than Fine Young Cannibals--which I first read Scott's words as, which wouldn't have made sense since FYCs were Brits loved by Americans, right?

My fave songs on *Pig Lib* are "Water and a Seat," "(Do Not Feed The) Oyster," "Craw Song," and "1% of One," only the last of which is nine minutes long. Michaelangelo, what exactly makes Malkmus's earlier stuff more "song"-like to you? I'm not arguing; just curious. The guy's words have almost never made any sense to me whatsoever...but I suspect you mean his new melodies aren't as pretty, maybe? Hmmmm.

chuck, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Godrich's touch may have been more discreet on "Terror Twilight" than on "Sea Change", for instance, but it's still noticeable. Like Daniel Lanois, if he's not restrained, I think he has a tendency to try and create "atmosphere" in a way that sounds artificial and syrupy. Matos really nailed it with his "sepia-toned" analogy.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Still, I could have abided his production on TT if the songs were good, but mostly they were weak - noticeably weaker than the tunes on the new Malkmus solo album, IMHO.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

okay, you guys have sold me. i will have to go buy pig lib. maybe i will even listen to the first one again and see what i think. it underwhelmed me at the time. the first malkmus solo album, that is.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)

definitely the melodies aren't as attractive; they meander more, are less concise. this in itself isn't grounds for hate, but I think they meander so much on Pig Lib that I lose track (and interest) really quickly. the words are and always have been secondary to me, too, though I do like his lyrics generally, maybe would on the new one if they announced themselves instead of fading into the underbrush like everything else. I generally don't notice rock lyrics unless they're really attention-grabbing (cf. Dylan, Lifter Puller)

I'm tempted to needle Hstencil some more re: rural prog, but I don't actually hate it. it does seem like a kind of dead-end genre--probably no more than, say, microhouse or jungle, granted, but I suspect I'm just saying that because I don't hear Malkmus doing much of interest with it.

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

both matos and chuck will be happy to hear that i was seriously rocking out to lifter puller the other night. a record that has grown on me like creeper weed. um, the soft rock one.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought the first Malkmus record, with the exception of "Church on White," sounded like a really bad novelty record.

hstencil, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm the same way about lyrics. they really have to stand out for me to even notice that they are there. but when i like them, i really like them. which is why i find myself still listening to stuff like the second harvey danger album of all things. Malkmus is good at twisting things around in interesting ways. i have never found myself searchin for anything resembling meaning from his songs though.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Life Is A Rock (But The Radio Rolled Me)
By: Reunion
(Norman Dolph-Paul DiFranco-Joey Levine)
1974

B. Bumble and the Stingers, Mott the Hoople, Ray Charles Singers
Lonnie Mack and twangin' Eddy, here's my ring we're goin' steady
Take it easy, take me higher, liar liar, house on fire
Locomotion, Poco, Passion, Deeper Purple, Satisfaction
Baby baby gotta gotta gimme gimme gettin' hotter
Sammy's cookin', Lesley Gore and Ritchie Valens, end of story
Mahavishnu, fujiyama, kama-sutra, rama-lama
Richard Perry, Spector, Barry, Rogers-Hart, Nilsson, Harry
Shimmy shimmy ko-ko bop and Fats is back and Finger Poppin'

Life is a rock but the radio rolled me
Gotta turn it up louder, so my DJ told me
Life is a rock but the radio rolled me
At the end of my rainbow lies a golden oldie

FM, AM, hits are clickin' while the clock is tock-a-tickin'
Friends and Romans, salutations, Brenda and the Tabulations
Carly Simon, I behold her, Rolling Stones and centerfoldin'
Johnny Cash and Johnny Rivers, can't stop now, I got the shivers
Mungo Jerry, Peter Peter Paul and Paul and Mary Mary
Dr. John the nightly tripper, Doris Day and Jack the Ripper
Gotta go Sir, gotta swelter, Leon Russell, Gimme Shelter
Miracles in smokey places, slide guitars and Fender basses
Mushroom omelet, Bonnie Bramlett, Wilson Pickett, stop and kick it

Life is a rock but the radio rolled me
Life is a rock but the radio . . .

Arthur Janov's primal screamin', Hawkins, Jay and Dale and Ronnie
Kukla, Fran and Norma Okla Denver, John and Osmond, Donny
JJ Cale and ZZ Top and LL Bean and De De Dinah
David Bowie, Steely Dan and sing me prouder, CC Rider
Edgar Winter, Joanie Sommers, Osmond Brothers, Johnny Thunders
Eric Clapton, pedal wah-wah, Stephen Foster, do-dah do-dah
Good Vibrations, Help Me Rhonda, Surfer Girl and Little Honda
Tighter, tighter, honey, honey, sugar, sugar, yummy, yummy
CBS and Warner Brothers, RCA and all the others

Life is a rock but the radio rolled me
Gotta turn it up louder, so my DJ told me
Life is a rock but the radio rolled me
At the end of my rainbow lies a golden oldie

Listen (remember) they're playing our song

Rock it, sock it, Alan Freed me, Murray Kaufman, try to leave me
Fish, and Swim, and Boston Monkey, Make it bad and play it funky

(Wanna take you higher!)

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry. coudn't resist. i posted them on that rap thread. my favorite rap song and favorite lyrics from 1974.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Matos, see I like it that he's trying to do something with a "dead-end genre" (even if I don't really care to hear the results).

I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about his lyrics, either.

hstencil, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

but waitaminute, the new malkmus album isn't really prog, is it? i mean even if there is a 9 minute song on it? or rural prog? although, tis true that his favorite album is by mellow candle.

scott seward, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

re-read my post, Stence. I have no real idea whether the genre is dead-end or not since I don't know most of it, but I'm assuming it is because Pig Lib is

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha. I think I'm with Matos and Stencil here. The difference between Pavement and solo Malkmus has always felt to me like the difference between a good Donovan song and a bad one -- the latter seems weirdly meandering and a little too pleased with itself for no apparent reason, and I'm getting closer to the point where I could sort of picture Malkmus whispering about Atlantis for six minutes over a flanged-out guitar figure.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that's on the bonus disc

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

actually this all makes me want to hear the Malkmus now. And I haven't heard a Pavement record since Wowee Zowee, when I sort of lost interest. But then Wishbone Ash's Argus is a big favorite of mine as well..

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 20:33 (twenty-two years ago)

The bonus disc actually has better, more straightforward songs than the main disc. But they're still no great shakes.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

seven years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWGSK8IfRCI

^ great Big Dipper footage

O Permaban (NickB), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ This song is immense, it blew me away when I got that 3-disc retrospective Merge put out a couple of years ago.

But. It's so good that the songs that follow pale in comparison to a ridiculous degree. I still haven't heard all three discs because of it.

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)

love "faith healer," and that's a great clip, but deny that it so thoroughly outshines the rest of their scant catalog. they're not a band of a million hits, but they've got a few. i wouldn't even call myself a fan, necessarily, but "lunar module" and "ron klaus wrecked his house" stand among my favorite songs of the era, looming, in my mind, even over "faith healer". they're nowhere near so corkscrew tense and clever, but far more beautiful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS3WsiNCBpY
(not the best version, and tragically quiet, but you takes what you gets)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQbBcbByk_0
(ibid, though differently, and loud)

contenderizer, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)

honestly, you'd be best advised to skip the crappy youtubes and just listen to the songs somewhere

contenderizer, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)

I'll give 'em a go, but really it's 'corkscrew tense and clever' that I'm naturally attracted to, so my response may well differ to yours.

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

just got trumans water's spasm smash XXX0X0X ox and ass 2LP the other day, and that shit KILLLLLS.

69, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

they were fun live. they made a racket.

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

My latest cranky '80s indie-rock opinion (which Scott will be happy to hear) is that I've decided I like Human Sexual Response more than Skin Yard. (Though they were both pretty good, I guess. Definitely both influenced my '70s art-rock, too -- Roxy Music and King Crimson respectively, for starters -- though HSR's songs are a lot easier to hear. And they had a better sense of humor.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

(Also both pre-1987, but what the heck. And Skin Yard weren't that much pre-1987.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

i moved back to connecticut in the early 90's for a few years and lived with my brother and other fabulous furry freaks in a horrible house in new milford connecticut and we would go to T.K.'s Sports Lounge in Danbury on Sunday nites cuz Sunday nite was alternative nite much to the chagrin of the sports fans there and i saw a lot of latter-day indie rock stuff - i remember madder rose and maybe the lilies and definitely the swirlies and lots of other like-minded folks - and i never dug much of it but i did dig trumans water. buffalo tom. yeah, didn't like them. and our local, um, heroes would play. monsterland and st. johnny and hed and gnu fuzz and china pig and the awful awful bunnybrains.

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

Buffalo Tom

Four Squirrels

but it could have happened when i was playing tesla (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

i just put on a 90's indie rock album by a band i've never heard of and its a singles comp and d.wolk apparently put out some stuff by them and that's actually why i'm listening to it. cuz i like his style. dymaxion. but i don't know if they are american. probably not. and its later 90's stuff. kinda cool so far.

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

But. It's so good that the songs that follow pale in comparison to a ridiculous degree.

MacDara, I didn't buy that Big Dipper collection, but if it's in chronological order, then all the other stuff that follows on the Boo Boo EP does kind of suck iirc. BUT: the first album proper, Heavens, was really good! If you like the tenser, tighter stuff, you really gotta give 'Younger Bums' or 'Easter Eve' a go. Second album was alrightish too, but the third (which came out on Epic instead of Homestead) aiieee, that was a huge stinker imo.

O Permaban (NickB), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEqr0PtvPxU

^ Skin Yard's best song -so fucking good- but the whole of the Hallowed Ground album was dead nice, had this cold clammy vampyric feel to it. Maybe even slightly Voivod-ish, but perhaps the later Die Kreuzen albums are a closer point of comparison.

O Permaban (NickB), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

not enough happy flowers love on this thread. they poop on skin yard!

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

They probably pooped on their cat too.

O Permaban (NickB), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

There should really be a Happy FLowers song title poll on ILM though.

O Permaban (NickB), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

I would have killed to see the Swirlies and the Lilys in the early 90s at the Danbury place. Also St. Johnny.

Anybody a fan of Uncle Wiggly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSTnwVJT0Ho&feature=related

I will always think of you, while (quite) fondly, myself (Evan), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

i love them especially the stuff that d.wolk put out!

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

everyone needs to go to douglas's website and buy these:

DBC219 World (of Dreams)'s Who Is Yahdoosh? CD

DBC216 Uncle Wiggly's Farfetchedness CD

love 'em both a bunch. i actually don't know a ton of uncle wiggly. the yahdoosh album is wiggly guitarist. so great.

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'll probably go do that!

I will always think of you, while (quite) fondly, myself (Evan), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

Whether you liked the music or not (I can't remember most of it) the zines were hilarious and mean. Everyone hated everyone else's music.

toni mitchell (u s steel), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

god, what was i listening to in the mid-to-late 80s? a lot of critic's darlings, i guess... stuff recommended to me by option, the village voice and forced exposure on the one hand, melody maker and NME on the other. plus a random mix of what my friends were into and what i'd heard on college radio. lots of noisy weirdness that aligned itself peripherally with punk, but almost no traditional hardcore, and very little chart pop of any sort. a partial list:

dead kennedys
SST bands (flag, husker du, minutemen)
pussy galore
sonic youth
swans
REM
the replacements
the fall
laurie anderson
the jesus & mary chain
halo of flies
prince
camper van beethoven
violent femmes
the sub pop 100 comp
big black
the butthole surfers
dinosaur (jr)
scratch acid
spacemen 3 & loop
public enemy & run DMC
licensed to ill
the wipers
green river
u-men
beat happening
voivod
metallica
iron maiden
slayer
suicidal tendencies
guns 'n roses
bad brains
naked raygun
the pogues
elvis costello
the membranes
the pixies' come on pilgrim
the flaming lips' hear it is
throwing muses
the dream syndicate
the scientists (aus)
X (LA)
the dwarves' horror stories
the lyres
nomeansno
the cramps
the clash
foetus
XTC
wire
big stick's drag racing EP
king crimson
shriekback
throbbing gristle

i loved the volcano suns' all night lotus party, but it took me a while to work my way back to mission of burma. i remember investigating a lot of bands and records during this period, many of which i didn't much care for or follow forward: the fibbonnaccis, eugene chadborne, saqqara dogs, hugo largo, 10,000 maniacs, negativland, etc. going by mix tapes from the era, most of my real favorites were drawn from the list of usual suspects above, though i'd be interested in revisiting some of the stuff i couldn't make sense of at the time.

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

This MP3 blog runs a few years past 1992 more often than not, but it's a treat if you have some intangible hankering to hear Run Westy Run, Lucy's Fur Coat or Overwhelming Colorfast again.

http://ihatethe90s.blogspot.com/

philippe is standing on it (MaresNest), Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

...to continue that which doesn't really need the continuance, by the early-to-mid 90s i'd (temporarily) left the northwest by way of DC for chapel hill, NC. the music i was into hadn't changed much in its basic character, though the names and personnel were in constant flux. i don't have as many mix tapes from the '92 end of the spectrum, but here's what i can remember:

guided by voices (huge in my personal pantheon, occupying the place in my heart that husker du and sonic youth had a few years before)
pavement
nirvana (who i'd seen playing house party shows in '88 in olympia)
unrest (picked up on my way through DC)
mudhoney
tad (and sub-pop's endless et ceteras)
rapeman (the name, the name)
jesus lizard (like rapeman, the outgrowth of a previous favorite)
beck (i admit it)
sebadoh
NWA (belong in the above list, tbh)
MBV
more sonic youth (of course)
stereolab
polvo
superchunk
laughing hyenas
flaming lips (the flowering of)
the jon spencer blues explosion
mercury rev
the pain teens
the mike gunn (tom carter!)
caspar brotzmann massakar
boredoms
bongwater
the cows
more public enemy
a tribe called quest
digital underground
cypress hill
the pharcyde
black sheep
the jungle brothers
del tha funkee homosapien (very little rap, tbh)
drive like jehu (ex-pitchfork)
opal (but not mazzy star)
liz phair (didn't we all)
madder rose
antiseen (damn i wish i still had those joe young solo EPs)
the celibate rifles
the honeymoon killers
the lazy cowgirls
glenn branca (playing catch-up)
band of susans
L7
billy childish (milkshakes, headcoats)
the cynics
the nomads
the hard-ons (aus)
earth's extra capsular extraction
african head charge (and on-U in general)
john zorn (naked city, etc)
combustible edison
terminal cheesecake
main (ex-loop)
various bill laswell dub/noise projects
F/i
the gibson brothers
squirrel nut zippers (yuk, okay, but i worked with the brother of one)
flat duo jets
MOTO
the gories
the mummies
daniel johnston
jandek (never understood)
kyuss
monster magnet
entombed
truman's water and thinking fellers UL 282 (neither of whom i liked, but god knows i tried)
sun city girls (ibid, but with a bit more enthusiasm)

between the two punishingly exhaustive lists above, i think you get a decent cross-section of several threads of american indie rock during the period in question. i'm sure there's TONS of stuff i missed, ignored or didn't understand at the time, but i was working hard to "keep up" during those years, making lists of records i felt i needed to hear almost every month, and spending most of my time and money tracking down what i could. it's an interesting period to consider, from my POV, because it moves from the emergence of what would later be called "indie rock" (early-mid 80s, you can maybe nail it to the period when homestead formed and established labels like SST and touch and go started to push at the boundaries of punk/hardcore), to the point where indie became a formalized, codified genre in the mid 90s (thinking here of the bands that came up in pavement's wake: built to spill, etc). that's the point at which i started to lose interest in the genre.

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:41 (fifteen years ago)

I love the Cows, I listened to them the other day! And the Happy Flowers! Are Voivod really an indie / alterna band? I saw them live and regretted it.

toni mitchell (u s steel), Thursday, 30 December 2010 02:19 (fifteen years ago)

Well, if we're gonna post long lists, I might as well at least link to a couple. These have LOTS of indie rock I was listening to back then on them (until I stopped). '86 and '87 are the most overwhelmingly indie, I think.

Probably some of the best (and worst) records of 1988, but not all of them

probably not the best 150 albums of 1987

probably not really the 125 best albums of 1986

probably not the 50 best albums and singles (and/or EPs) of 1985

xhuxk, Thursday, 30 December 2010 02:41 (fifteen years ago)

Are Voivod really an indie / alterna band? I saw them live and regretted it.

― toni mitchell (u s steel), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 6:19 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

yeah, no, they aren't. context-setting, like the mentions of NWA, laurie anderson, guns n' roses, etc. probably should have thrown in fishbone, RHCP and jane's addiction, too. and though those lists are unforgivably long, as soon as i'd submitted them, i started thinking of all the loved ones i'd left off: robyn hitchcock/the soft boys, julian cope, lilies, swirlies, pastels, happy flowers (as you say), killdozer, hickoids, drunks with guns, GG, honor role, squirrel bait, big dipper, lemonheads, feelies, stop me now, for the love of god...

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

I do think of Voivod as part of this genre, but I suppose in part because the only time I saw them it was on a bill with Soundgarden and Prong.

timellison, Thursday, 30 December 2010 03:45 (fifteen years ago)

I'm wondering how you can not like TFUL282?

the bear in the bumper car (rip van wanko), Thursday, 30 December 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

because they won't stop being crazy and just rock the fuck out

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 08:38 (fifteen years ago)

^ this seems a terribly flip response. i haven't listened to TFUL in some 20 years, and even at the time only ever heard lovelyville and mother of all saints. all i really remember about either album is that "shuddering big butter" is both a funny phrase and a cool tune (i think). fundamentally, i guess they outwigged me. i found their music more interesting than enjoyable, and i'm a creature of simple pleasures.

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

u should check out Strangers To The Universe or Bob Dinners or Admonishing The Bishops, the TFUL282 are gods who walk among us. imo their best work came after the time period being discussed.

sleeve, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

Man, this era was the halcyon time when I first started doing college radio. These were some personal favorites:

...
Repulse Kava
...

― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:51 PM (7 years ago) Bookmark

goddam, mr. diamond's list from 7 years back is awesome, brings back tons of memories, bands i left off those giant lists i posted yesterday, some of whom i haven't thought of in years. urge overkill, phantom tollbooth, sister ray, clawhammer, the original sins, crystalized movements, union carbide productions, feedtime, the 3Ds. such a great time to be an indie...

i wanted to highlight the repulse kava mention, though. i was listening to a used copy of their flow gently, sweet alpha LP in a record store a few weeks ago and loved it to death. it's a record you used to see for cheap all the time, and one that i always meant to get around to, but never did. turns out it's great! super-tight, minutemen-like garage jamming, all thrashy and gleefully rambunctious. non-pop catchy too, like the distilled essence of late 80s indie-punk, carducci's platonic ideal. sweaty, weird, secretive and totally dedicated to the moment.

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

u should check out Strangers To The Universe or Bob Dinners or Admonishing The Bishops

yeah, i've always meant to revisit both TFUL and truman's water. i'm a little more musically open-minded now than i was in my youth, and they seem to be beloved of many whose tastes i respect.

contenderizer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

'Coercion' by Repulse Kava was a top song! They kind of reminded me a lot of Phantom Tollbooth at the time cos they had that jammed out noise thing going on and then suddenly they'd hook up to a tune and go shooting off into space like they were riding on the tail of a comet. Except I watched a couple of Phantom Tollbooth videos a while back and they were sort of terrible.

TFUL282 were fantastic, but if you picked up the wrong album, you could find them a wee bit ho-hum. Strangers from the Universe and Admonishing the Bishops are both solid places to start though.

O Permaban (NickB), Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.