― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)
― stevo (stevo), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh Timmermann (Josh Timmermann), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh Timmermann (Josh Timmermann), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
Reading Pazz & Jop vs reading/posting on ILM: a major difference
― Andy_K (Andy_K), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:04 (nineteen years ago)
what I really likeis reading other's ballotsand cross-checking links
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
MIAKanye WestSufjan Stevens
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
you could probably add Beck to that and have the top four
― scott pl. (scott pl.), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)
I HAVE A MOMMMMMHER NAME IS MOMMMMMMM
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:45 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
― shut up (noodle vague), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)
― The Man in the Iron-On Mask (noodle vague), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
jess, why do you change your ilm name so much?
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:25 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)
Rollin w. the zeitgeist
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
Proud to contribute to the horseshit
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
Trinidad and Tobago - 156 points (QUALIFY AS WINNERS)England - 127 points (QUALIFY)Sweden - 119 pointsParaguay - 100 points
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― ziti sanskrit (sanskrit), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
x-post Jim DeRogatis and twinkies. "I can't quit you!"
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Eazy (Eazy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― don't start a RYE-OTT! (plsmith), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― don't start a RYE-OTT! (plsmith), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)
That's the way it might have looked in 1982!
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)
hahahaaha....that was fun!
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)
btw, Crash won the Ensemble Acting SAG cuz it had MORE ACTORS.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
sneak preview:
'Voters have always shown their fondness for commercial pleasures in their singles ballot, and this year is no exception...'
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― gato, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)
― TRG (TRG), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)
― älänbänänä (alanbanana), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
anyway, this has been some week for news, huh?
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.leokoenig.com/works.php?art_id=19&im_id=1
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.leokoenig.com/artists/sanford/15.jpg
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)
― maura (maura), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)
― twoheadedboy, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:30 (nineteen years ago)
wtf? how did Sufjan win in the singles category?
― ziti sanskrit (sanskrit), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)
― maura (maura), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― chris herrington (chris herrington), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
(xpost)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
predix:1. Kanye2. MIA3. Fiona Apple4. White Stripes5. Sufjan
― chris herrington (chris herrington), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)
Or something, I dunno.
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― dan. (dan.), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
― P&J Poohbah (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)
perhaps they don't want msg boarders and bloggers going whole hog before everyone gets the paper in their hands
― ziti sanskrit (sanskrit), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric Weisbard (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)
― someteenpartying (someteenpartying), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)
(scene: a white screen. enter RAYMOND CUMMINGS)
RC: are we....ready? STEVO: go on... RC: i would but it ain't up just yet
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
it really is. i'm enjoying the calm, fuck the storm.
― dancing chicken (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)
― EZ Snappin (afka Erik the Mainer) (EZSnappin), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
― senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
― JC-L (JC-L), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
One of my pals at the Voice just gave me all the spoilers about the top 3!
Does that make me king of the Internet now?
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)
― ziti sanskrit (sanskrit), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
― ziti sanskrit (sanskrit), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)
http://www-stu.calvin.edu/chimes/2000.09.08/images/nader.jpg
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.tomhull.com/ocston/nm/notes/pnj05c.php
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
AFTER MAKING SURE THAT GORE WAS MORE THAN 10% AHEAD IN NY STATE'S POLLS!
sorry.
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:21 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop05/
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)
― pdf (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Jibé (Jibé), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)
xgau is ned
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:49 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:49 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie The Tunanym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)
Oh well.
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)
when do glenn mcdonald's critical alignment ratings come out?
― dan (dan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)
...if you total in last year's and this year's votes for "Galang," it's up at 105 votes, 4th place. (I think the reason they didn't is that this year's have to be up to half of last year's before they'll add 'em together.)
Real surprise for me is the Marley single, which I actually have and think is OK, but I totally forgot about it.
And 145 is actually a weak total for a winner.
But GREAT YEAR 'CAUSE TWO COUNTRY SONGS PLACED IN THE TOP 40, ONE OF WHICH IS ACTUALLY GREAT!
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
After "structurally slanted," which I don't understand at all, this is completely and utterly unreadable.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:03 (nineteen years ago)
― maura (maura), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:06 (nineteen years ago)
― maura (maura), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:07 (nineteen years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)
haha, I take it that quote is from Julianne Shepherd?
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
Here's to fact checkers !
― Russell (Russell), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
the Voice let its fact checking dept. go last week
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Stapleton, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
"Structurally slanted" implies to me a claim that music "made outside of the crack-white universe" will always lose out on the poll, no matter who the poobahs give ballots to (or even who returns their ballots), and there's something about the rules of the poll and ballot-making and what not that shortchanges the non-crack-white-universe.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
SINGLES"Gold Digger" on 18.2% of ballots cast"1 Thing" 16.7%"Since U Been Gone" 16.5%
These are comparatively weak, esp. the singles. In 2000 OutKast won albums with 37.5% and singles with 21.2%; in 2001 Dylan won albums with 37.6% and Missy won singles with 28.1%; in 2002 Wilco won albums with 28.9% and Missy won singles with 30.4%; in 2003 Outkast won albums with 42.1% (White Stripes second w/ 29.0%) and singles with 44.1% (Beyoncé was second with 27.9%, which'd have won easily this year); in 2004 Kanye won albums with 30.9% and Franz won singles with 18.4%.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
― älänbänänä (alanbanana), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Josh Love (screamapillar), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
I love it.
― patrick bateman (mickeygraft), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)
― dipshit violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:47 (nineteen years ago)
― disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:49 (nineteen years ago)
i guess this refers to how producer type dudes like jazzy pha and timbaland or folks like that who do their best work as producers or beatmakers for other artists don't tend to get mentioned because they don't actually release work under their own name (mostly, anyway)....I guess that seems kinda right, but I suppose I guess maybe that's always happened in some sense...like to Brill Building folks or arrangers like Axelrod or something.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:50 (nineteen years ago)
(oops)
― disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/9705/14/newsradio/link.hartman.jpg?
― adam (adam), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:54 (nineteen years ago)
― adam (adam), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)
― disco violence (disco violence), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)
haha doi! i should remember not everyone lives in minneapolis.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)
Is it an academic thing, though, or more like your standard internet rant style?
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)
pff, lots of things on the singles list came out in 2004. and gasolina was an '05 single in terms of when i heard it blaring out the most car windows, which counts as much as anything.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
Here are the position on the chart of my selections:
1) 1162) 8483) 9224) 25) 2066) 347) 3438) 4969) 171110) 377
The disc that would have made my Top Ten (removing my #10) had I remembered it when I did my ballot came in at #732. I feel horrible that my oversight might have cost it from getting into the Top 700.
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
But however you work it, Joshua's argument doesn't hold together intellectually, given that plumping for work by Jazze Pha is identical as far as I can tell to plumping for Timbaland or the Neptunes or Rich Harrison or Max Martin, all of whom have placed work high on Pazz & Jop. For that matter, I don't see how plumping for Jazze Pha is particularly different from plumping for Brian Wilson or Kanye West or M.I.A. In all cases, you're citing an individual for his or her contribution to music. And also, I don't see how the "ideal" is inherently racist, since not only does it tend to shortchange white-guy Max Martin, it also shortchanges white-guy John Shanks, whom I've been praising all over this board, and a whole bunch of other deserving white men and women, not to mention it's not entirely new to overlook producers, orchestrators, engineers and the like. People tend to vote for the frontman and the name on the marquee.
xpost
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)
Haha, I love you.
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
"Stay Fly" is crack nostalgia?
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
Half of P&J voters have only the slightest idea of who Girls Aloud even are. ILM != the world.
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)
more xpost
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
Ah yes, sorta. Ugly output though.
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
I'm gonna have me some orange juice. I may or may not be back.
― disco violence (disco violence), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)
Yes, Frank, that makes sense many times over.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:14 (nineteen years ago)
But Brian, together we got Witchcraft to #377!
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:18 (nineteen years ago)
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), February 1st, 2006.
Ha! Even after we've been tousling all day?
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)
Well then P&J needs more Brits.
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:21 (nineteen years ago)
One day we will rule all of the universe, save for the top 376 of it...
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:22 (nineteen years ago)
P&J: American By Birth, Southern by the Grace of God
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:27 (nineteen years ago)
utterly boring. lacklustre covers given to a soul vet to sing in a phone-booth (in other words, going for that johnny cash barebonez indierock cash).
the race thing never bothers me that much. most rock critics, black and white, are nerds who like nerdy music and most nerdy music is made by white people. so there you have it.
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan's nanny (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:33 (nineteen years ago)
― sovietpanda (sovietpanda), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:33 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:34 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:47 (nineteen years ago)
These are comparatively weak, esp. the singles ...
In addition, MIA and Kanye both earned 11.1 points/vote, which is also on weak side.
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)
― cdwill, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:02 (nineteen years ago)
this amused me
― Anthony Easton, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:03 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:03 (nineteen years ago)
welcome to the club!
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:04 (nineteen years ago)
It used to be that if you processed a thousand records in a year you heard a good chunk of all you could hear. This year I voted for a record that finished in 1,711th. I mean, how many of us *critically* listened to 1,700+ albums this year? That's over five different CDs a day without a single day off and if you're really listening critically, you probably listen to it more than once.
While some critics who are fortunate and good enough to make a living critiquing music might be able to listen to new music from a variety of sources 8-10 hours a day, the majority of us are part-timers who cannot devote that much time to listening to music.
So what happens when we hit a time crunch? We start spending more time with things that we know and/or things that our jobs require us to listen to. The regional guy listens to CDs of artists touring through his town, the rap contributor doesn't get past much hip-hop.
We will see the top albums get less of a percentage of the vote every year from now on, methinks, barring some year where something comes along that breaks through on a momumental scale. And Kanye West's second best album isn't it.
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:08 (nineteen years ago)
"Was Greil supposed to vote for the Legendary K.O. twice?"
P&J poobahs NEED to know this kinda stuff (which inevitably happens every year, despite endliess hours of eyeballing lists & ballots beyond your wildest fucking imagination), so if you notice any such technical gaffes, please email your favorite p&j poobah ASAP. Thanx!
― A Poobah, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:18 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:22 (nineteen years ago)
The Grand Poobah, naturally...
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)
Oh, don't give a thought to it. I held down the bottom or next to bottom for a couple years along with a few other familiars 'round here.
I'd like to see the P&J results plotted on a graph -- the actual curve and the area under it. You'd probably see right away that the area under the curve devoted to the one and two vote getters -- hey, most everything outside the Top 40 outweighing the "median" slice by a couple orders of magnitude. But I've always been too lazy to do it.
― George the Animal Steele, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 03:51 (nineteen years ago)
1-vote albums: 1229 votes -vs- Top 9 combined: 1201 votes
― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
1-vote albums: 1229 votes -vs- Top 9 combined: 1201 votes1- or 2-: 1753 -vs- Top 17: 17471- 2- 3-: 2140 -vs- Top 24: 21201- 2- 3- 4-: 2424 -vs- Top 31: 240313 or fewer: 3957 - vs- Top 100: 3872
99 and 100 got 13 votes each, so that's the split point.
― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:48 (nineteen years ago)
Go Tom Ewing go! And Ethan and Scott and everyone below me (though I'm pretty far down there myself).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 05:53 (nineteen years ago)
― George the Animal Steele, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:14 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, you can't spell marxist w/o matrix, er marx it, er..... RACIST!!
― cw mccall, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:24 (nineteen years ago)
I ponder at this.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:29 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:33 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:37 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:53 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:54 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 06:56 (nineteen years ago)
Very impressive that this squeezed in so high amongst the pop/rock consensus. I'll have to get this now.
Ashlee Simpson managed to place higher than a few albums I thought were alright:
the DirtbombsAmerican Analog SetBritish Sea PowerBlack LipsTroubled HubbleSage FrancisMice Parade13 & GodField MusicHolopawBoom Bap ProjectSoleFlipsydeQuasimotoChoachwhipsDiplo
― Brian Jones (Brian Jones), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:09 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:14 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Chris O., Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:18 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:23 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:24 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:28 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:35 (nineteen years ago)
you don't mean that
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:41 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:43 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:10 (nineteen years ago)
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 08:38 (nineteen years ago)
― bradluen (Brad), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:10 (nineteen years ago)
1971 Mahavishnu Orchestra: The Inner Mounting Flame #101979 Art Ensemble of Chicago: Nice Guys #291980 Arthur Blythe: Illusions #341981 James Blood Ulmer: Free Lancing #251982 Ronald Shannon Jackson and the Decoding Society: Mandance #381982 Ornette Coleman: Of Human Feelings #131983 James Blood Ulmer: Odyssey #201986 Pat Metheny/Ornette Coleman: Song X #191987 Ornette Coleman: In All Languages #111988 Ornette Coleman and Prime Time: Virgin Beauty #131991 Sonny Sharrock: Ask the Ages #151993 Cassandra Wilson: Blue Light 'Til Dawn (Blue Note) #341995 James Carter: The Real Quietstorm #291996 Cassandra Wilson: New Moon Daughter #16
Actually, this may not be all of them. Also, I'm not counting things like Olu Dara or *The Carl Stalling Project* or anything in the "reissues" category.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:20 (nineteen years ago)
Ignoring EPs, since maybe six people still listen to them, the guitarists point is somewhat valid, though I hardly think a critics' list of guitarists would be disproportionately white. But the thing is that guitarists are recognised, because, y'know, they're in the band, and it's the band's name that gets associated with the record. And no one cares enough about Charlie Sexton to demand a poll honouring him.
― bradluen (Brad), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 09:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 10:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 10:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
I don't agree with this: it's the same argument used to shoot down affirmative action. It allows one to claim the moral high ground while ignoring that there's real damage being done (though the problem in this case may not be at the top of the NAACP's list). If you see a problem, then you take the necessary steps to fix it.
If it weren't for Clover you could read P&J and be unaware of Jazze Pha's existence. And Rich Harrison doesn't even fare that well, and he's the (OK arguable) presiding talent on the #2 single of the year.
― bradluen (Brad), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)
the jazzy phizzle is very frikin known.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 13:19 (nineteen years ago)
tell me about it. for all intents and purposes, it doesn't for most mainstream music critics (or "mainstream other people" for that matter). I guess everyone has their little group of records they listen to, so I can't be mad mine isn't "theirs". It does make these polls a lot less exciting for me though.
― Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
i'm not complaining, mind you; just find it interesting to be so far outside the "mainstream" or mean or whatever you wanna call it. of the top 40 albums, there are only four that i actually heard all the way through.
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Je4nn3 ƒur¥ WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO VOTED FOR 50 FT. WAVE, I HATE YOU ALL (Je4nne F, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
I am just guessing that if Isolee's label had been able to do more pr and sent the cd out to more American critics it might have done better in the critic community and among the folks who read such folks, not top the charts. Yea, I know Eminem's lesson--"nobody listens to techno."
I am an an afropop fan and am sure Amadou & Mariam did well (13th) in large part because of Manu Chao being on the cd, but being on Nonesuch (which likely sent out press cds) certainly did not hurt. Senegalese singer Thion Seck's Sterns release received only 6 votes(Me, Keith Harris and others). Yea, Seck's North African meets Egyptian meets Indian experiment was less pop than Amadou & Mariam (and similar a bit to the Youssou N'Dour Egypt cd from last year), but Sterns also sends out very few promos.
― curmudgeon Steve, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)
American Analog Set Set FreeBritish Sea Power Open SeasonCaesars, The Paper TigersCoheed and Cambria Good Apollo, I'm Burning Star IV, Volume One: From Fear Through the Eyes of MadnessEluvium Talk Amongst the TreesJal, Emmanuel & Abdel Gadir Salim Ceasefire Kelly, R. TP. 3: ReloadedKing Britt King Britt Presents: Sister Gertrude Morgan Morrison, Van Magic TimeShorter Quartet, Wayne Beyond the Sound BarrierYing Yang Twins U.S.A. (United State of Atlanta) Orishas El Kilo Jneiro Jarel Three Piece PuzzleMassi, Souad Honeysuckle Wrasse Johnny Pacheco Entre Amigos Bronco Fat Freddy's Drop Based on a True Story The Drop Ulrich Schnauss Far Away Trains Passing ByReich, Steve You Are (Variations) & Cello CounterpointCoptic Light Coptic Light No QuarterSantana, Juelz What the Game's Been Missing!Natalia y la Forquetina Casa
― Eazy (Eazy), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)
THREECharles Aaron; Trish Bendix; Jeff Chang; Sal Cinquemani; John Cunningham; Anthony Easton; Bill Friskics-Warren; Peter Glowatsky; Kristal Hawkins; Chris Herrington; Marc Hirsch; Roy Kasten; Rob Kemp; Steve Kiviat; Joshua Klein; Josh Love; Craig Marks; David Moore; Chris Neal; Nate Patrin; Matthew Perpetua; Mark Pytlik; Julianne Shepherd; Rachel Shimp; Rob Tannenbaum; Josh Timmermann; Jonah Weiner; Rickey Wright
FOUR--Jimmy Draper (1) Arular, (2) Robyn, (3) La La, (4) The Girl You Left Me For--Sasha Frere-Jones (1) Arular, (2) Since U Been Gone, (3) Robyn, (4) Kerosene (single)--Amy Phillips (1) Arular, (2) Run the Road, (3) Since U Been Gone, (4) Oh--Sara Sherr (1) Arular, (2) Since U Been Gone, (3) Anniemal, (4) Robyn
FIVE--Sterling Clover (1) Dangerous and Moving, (2) Since U Been Gone, (3) Anniemal, (4) Come Fly With Me, (5) Gasolina--Chuck Eddy (1) See You Next Tuesday, (2) I Am Me, (3) Arular, (4) Story of My Life, (5) Kerosene (single)--Jesse Fox Mayshark (1) Arular, (2) Run the Road, (3) Come Fly With Me, (4) Oh, (5) Gasolina
I only know many of you by your nom de keyboard, so I would like to ask this question. Are any of you Jimmy Draper? Are any of you Jesse Fox Mayshark? If not (or if so, even), who are these guys, and where have they been all my life? (I esp. like the Draper affinities: do-it-yourself fake dancehall, fake pop, real Ashlee, and girlpop thinly disguised as country.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)
Anthony, you can take credit for my having heard Robyn (or am I one of the two people)?
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
So it's me and Sara.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
I wrote a blurb today, oh boyAbout a lucky man who made the gradeAnd though the blurb was rather smallWell, I just had to laughI saw the photograph
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
sometimes
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
Also, a shout-out to David Moore, whoever he is.
I wanted to give a shout-out to D. Moore, too: we're the only two critics who voted for Lindsay Lohan's "First."
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
Jess, you fucker, that just made me lose my shit.
― Je4nn3 Æ’urÂ¥ (Je4nne Fury), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
I'm not, given by how well it placed (surprisingly?) on ILM, Stylus, and PFM polls. "Wearemonster" became the unspoken techno consensus pick of 2005, then you pool together all the P&J voters from ILM, Stylus, and PFM -- voila!
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
also, raposa and i sharing 7 out of 20 votes -> someone kill me at once (with kisses you big lug!)
― Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)
We could do this!
From the Pacheco CD, I recommend "Celia...Reina Soberana" (and pretty much only that song, though I have't listened to the album much).
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)
Jams, aside from some environmental Kanye I haven't heard one thing on yr ballot (ie, rockism forevah).
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
The best part WAS WHEN HE ACTUALLY HAD TO INTRODUCE HIMSELF TO HER. Because, of course, she didn't recognize him. At least she knew what "Gold Digger" was.
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
See, I need this on a T-shirt.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure Dan Perry is.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
I don't get this. I like seeing that albums and singles I voted for placed; I like rethinking and rearguing with myself (and others) about all those others, many I haven't heard or heard closely, but which I plan to pronto.
― Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)
I got to expose kids whose ideas of a musical good time went from Jay-D to Ashley Simpson and thought they covered the waterfront to "A Love Supreme," Laurie Anderson, John Cage, Fela and Femi, Steve Reich...
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)
I know this has been a concern for a while, but I think it's worse this year than ever before. I'm all for the Poobahs doing a little gerrymandering to get a more realistic and representative mix of tastes involved.
― chris herrington (chris herrington), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)
Hey now! Buy me dinner before you give me lip!
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)
hahahah xxpost
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:18 (nineteen years ago)
you really have no reading comprehension whatsoever, do you? (see the other couple hundred threads where we've talked about this. jesus.)
― xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
Just read Draper's Ashlee thing and if I decide to comment at length will do so on the teenpop thread. He's a good guy, but he's trying to have it both ways, first saying that it's fine for her to be prefab in the pop world, then praising her for effectively delivering the teenage mess on Autobiography. He's right about the album, but linking "prefab" and "pop" still seems condescending, even when meant as praise (or especially when meant as praise).
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:20 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:21 (nineteen years ago)
Like, what's wrong with "forethought" in place of "prefab"? And when she fucks up on her own terms - which she might well have, I didn't see it and even seeing it might not reveal just what the fuckup was - one can hold her accountable.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
Besides JB, whatcha gonna do, start rationing votes to achieve "genre balance"?
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
>you've gone on time and time again about how you wish more indie types voted! "in a better world..." etc! <
huh? where was this??
i'm WAY more selective about indie crits than ANY other crits. and james knows this, unless he's an even worse reader than he pretends to be.
― xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
I'd imagine it's more like asking/begging non-indie/alt specialists to participate.
I think the PnJ SHOULD serve the purpose of being a useful guide to what's been good and/or interesting in pop music in a given year and should be a more useful shorthand/checklist than the Billboard charts or soundscan or Grammy nominations or whatever measure you want to cite. After all, critics (collectively, especially) are supposed to listen to tons of music from all kinds of genres and think about it and care about and thus the collective opinions of a bunch of music critics should be of interest to listeners who don't get tons of promos in the mail and want a sense of what's going on that crosses genres and formats and the ability of records to penetrate the distribution system (still mostly radio/television, I'd imagine).
Anyway, that's what the poll's been in the past (at least it was for me) and still is despite its imperfections. It just seems more imperfect now than it used to be precisely because of the avalanche of indie specialists skewing the results.
― chris herrington (chris herrington), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
>asking/begging non-indie/alt specialists to participate.<
every. fucking. year.
― xhu, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)
― james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
After all, critics (collectively, especially) are supposed to listen to tons of music from all kinds of genres and think about it and care about and thus the collective opinions of a bunch of music critics should be of interest to listeners
Who says? This sounds like a recipe for nothing more than a shopper. Doing a shopper is incidental a lot of the time.
Do you believe that all the critics in this poll, or any poll, or any set of lists, always write in WHAT THEIR TOP LISTENS REALLY ARE? Or do you believe that some people, not all, practice herd mentality, or tweak a ballot so they think it will look good to someone else? And how do you tell who does it, when, and who doesn't?
because of the avalanche
Stop right at avalanche. It's an avalanche of critics, of people, dealing with an even larger avalanche of released music. And the avalanche of music is growing faster than the avalanche of "critics."
Neither are precisely categorizable, although both lend themselves to all kinds of demographic discussions. It can mean anything to anyone if you stare at it long enough.
― George the Animal Steele, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
OTM.
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:00 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)
>if you're going to claim you're selective about letting in indie critics, you shouldn't bring up James Blount. <
believe me, iffy qualifications of certain voters have crossed my mind more than once. maybe next year i'll get ambitious about purging.
anyway, as i've said lots of times, most indie rock specialists don't identify them as such, and a pretty high percentage of indie rock votes don't come from indie rock specialists, and I don't know what somebody is going to vote for until they vote. (just checked amy phillips's ballot; didn't look too indie-rock specialized to me, but hey, what do i know?) but you guys aren't idiots; you know all this.
― xhuxk, Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
(And honestly, the show we're putting on here in the ILX P&J threads seems sort of subdued, interrupted by occasional moments of pettiness.)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
Meanwhile, the poll is published in the Village Voice, not the USA Today.
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)
xpost to Frank
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― don weiner (don weiner), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
What? Um, yes. What was this about?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)
Beatles if they'd won in '66 and again in '67. I'm just sayin'.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Redd Harvest (Ken L), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
this is the ultimate consensus list, includes 188 lists [including: metacritic, rateyourmusic.com, ILM, pitchfork, pazz & jop, amyrobots/ greg's combined list plus Henrik's Acclaimed Music ranking and many more global print mags and webzines]
NEW!!! UPDATE 1ST FEBRUARY TOP 100 ALBUMS 0F 2005 (NOW INCLUDING 188 LIST) http://pub37.bravenet.com/forum/3172289350/show/589011
THE TOP 100 AS OF FEBRUARY 1ST :(IN BRACKETS = ACTUAL POSITION IN HENRIK'S CHART)
1 3883 ( 1) SURFJAN STEVENS '...ILLINOISE'2 2896 ( 3) ANTONY & JOHNSONS 'I AM A BIRD NOW'3 2648 ( 6) BLOC PARTY 'SILENT ALARM'4 2570 ( 2) M.I.A. 'ARULAR'5 2358 ( 5) LCD SOUNDSYSTEM 'LCD SOUNDSYSTEM
6 2139 ( 8) BRIGHT EYES 'I'M WIDE AWAKE IT'S MORNING'7 1968 ( 4) KANYE WEST 'LATE REGISTRATION'8 1927 ( 7) FRANZ FERDINAND 'YOU COULD HAVE IT...'9 1683 (13) THE WHITE STRIPES 'GET BEHIND ME SATAN'10 1622 (15) ANIMAL COLLECTIVE 'FEEL'
11 1591 ( 9) MY MORNING JACKET 'Z'12 1590 (14) WOLF PARADE 'APOLOGIES TO THE QUEEN MARY'13 1463 (23) SIGUR ROS 'TAKK...'14 1447 (10) GORILLAZ 'DEMON DAYS'15 1406 (11) NEW PORNOGRAPHERS 'TWIN CINEMA'
16 1399 (12) SLEATER-KINNEY 'THE WOODS'17 1377 (26) THE DECEMBERISTS 'PICARESQUE'18 1257 (19) CLAP YOUR HANDS SAY YEAH 'CLAP YOUR...'19 1187 (17) SPOON 'GIMME FICTION'20 1163 (33) DEVENDRA BANHART 'CRIPPLE CROW'
21 1156 (16) ART BRUT 'BANG BANG ROCK & ROLL'22 1153 (21) MAXIMO PARK 'A CERTAIN TRIGGER'23 1037 (35) SYSTEM OF A DOWN 'MESMERIZE'24 963 (20) BROKEN SOCIAL SCENE 'BROKEN SOCIAL SCENE'25 930 (30) KAISER CHIEFS 'EMPLOYMENT'
26 929 (24) ANDREW BIRD '...PRODUCTION OF EGGS'27 912 (32) KATE BUSH 'AERIAL'28 899 (--) THE MARS VOLTA 'FRANCES THE MUTE'29 884 (36) THE NATIONAL 'ALLIGATOR'30 882 (18) COMMON 'BE'
31 847 (22) THE MAGIC NUMBERS 'THE MAGIC NUMBERS'32 845 (--) DEATH CAB FOR CUTIE 'PLANS'33 806 (--) COLDPLAY 'X & Y'34 729 (28) OKKERVIL RIVER 'BLACK SHEEP BOY'35 699 (29) THE HOLD STEADY 'SEPERATION SUNDAY'
36 662 (31) BECK 'GUERO'37 654 (--) RUFUS WAINWRIGHT 'WANT TWO'38 628 (27) FIONA APPLE 'EXTRAORDINARY MACHINE'38 628 (--) ...AND YOU WILL KNOW.. 'WORLDS APART'40 624 (25) ISOLEE 'WE ARE MONSTERS'
41 614 (--) QUEENS OF THE STONE AGE 'LULLABIES...'42 585 (37) BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN 'DEMONS & DUST'43 584 (--) ELBOW 'LEADERS OF THE FREE WORLD'43 584 (--) EDITORS 'THE BACK ROOM'45 572 (--) LOW 'THE GREAT DESTROYER'
46 531 (34) DANGER DOOM 'THE MOUSE AND THE MASK'47 528 (--) EELS 'BLINKING LIGHTS AND...'48 489 (--) DEERHOOF 'THE RUNNERS FOUR'49 483 (--) STARS 'SET YOURSELF ON FIRE'50 481 (--) MOUNTAIN GOATS 'THE SUNSET TREE'
51 480 (--) BABYSHAMBLES 'DOWN IN ALBION'52 479 (--) BROADCAST 'TENDER BUTTONS'53 466 (--) RICHARD HAWLEY 'YOLES CORNER'54 459 (--) RY COODER 'CHAVEZ RIVINE'55 456 (--) RYAN ADAMS & CARDINALS 'COLD ROSES'
56 447 (--) AMADOU & MARIAM 'DIMANCHE A BAMAKO'57 433 (--) NINE INCH NAILS 'WITH TEETH'58 427 (--) EDAN 'BEAUTY AND THE BEAT'59 422 (--) ARCHITECTURE IN HELSINKI 'IN CASE...'59 422 (--) BOARDS OF CANADA 'CAMPFIRE HEADPHASE'
61 413 (--) HARD-FI 'STARS ON CCTV'62 391 (--) OASIS 'DON'T BELIEVE THE TRUTH'63 382 (--) NEIL YOUNG 'PRAIRIE WIND'64 378 (--) OPETH 'GHOST REVERIES'65 369 (--) JOHN LEGEND 'GET LIFTED'
66 357 (--) JAMIE LIDELL 'MULTIPLY'67 354 (--) BLACK MOUNTAIN 'BLACK MOUNTAIN'68 351 (--) ROLLING STONES 'A BIGGER BANG'69 350 (--) THE RAKES 'CAPTURE / RELEASE'70 349 (--) VASHTI BUNYAN 'LOOKAFTERING'
71 345 (--) PATRICK WOLF 'WIND IN THE WIRES'72 344 (--) VITALIC 'OK COWBOY'73 341 (--) M83 'BEFORE THE DAWN HEALS US'74 337 (--) DEPECHE MODE 'PLAYING THE ANGEL'75 331 (--) JOSH ROUSE 'NASHVILLE'
76 329 (--) MADONNA 'CONFESSIONS ON THE DANCEFLOOR'77 328 (--) COCOROSIE 'NOAH'S ARK'78 325 (--) BONNIE 'PRINCE' BILLY 'SUPERWOLF'79 291 (--) BRIGHT EYES 'DIGITAL ASH IN A...'80 290 (--) THE GO-BETWEENS 'OCEANS APART'
81 288 (--) IRON & WINE / CALEXICO 'IN THE REINS'81 288 (--) THE BOOKS 'LOST AND SAFE'83 287 (--) LIGHTNING BOLT 'HYPERMAGIC MOUNTAIN'84 284 (--) KONONO NO1 'COGOTRONICS'85 280 (--) TOCOTRONIC 'PURE VERNUNFT...'
86 278 (--) PAUL MC CARTNEY 'CHAOS AND CREATION...'87 264 (--) AKRON / FAMILY :'AKRON / FAMILY'88 262 (--) LADYTRON 'WITCHING HOUR'89 259 (--) MARTHA WAINWRIGHT 'MARTHA WAINWRIGHT'89 259 (--) JOSE GONZALES 'VENEER'
91 255 (--) ROBYN 'ROBYN'92 247 (--) DOVES 'SOME CITIES'93 244 (--) MANDO DIAO 'HURRICANE BAR'94 240 (--) GOLDFRAPP 'SUPERNATURE'95 237 (--) SILVER JEWS 'TANGLEWOOD NUMBERS'
96 235 (--) NADA SURF 'THE WEIGHT IS A GIFT'97 231 (--) BLACK REBEL MOTORCYCLE CLUB 'HOWL'98 230 (--) BRITISH SEA POWER 'OPEN SEASON'99 226 (--) M.WARD 'TRANSISTOR RADIO'100 225 (--) DREDG 'CATCH WITHOUT ARMS'
HAVE BEEN INCLUDED FROM THEIR 2004 SCORES :
RUFUS WAINWRIGHT : 37 POINTSAMADOU & MARIAM : 17 POINTSJOHN LEGEND : 16 POINTS
THE TOP 100 OF 2004 INCLUDING ALL ALL 2005 SCORES ISPOSTED SEPERATLY.
THAT'S IT FOLKSUNTIL LATER THIS YEAR
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:35 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.soundaffects.net/photos/OfMontreal/ofmontreal08.jpg
... ends up with five votes, finishing in 195th place. Would have even finished much lower if I he hadn't gotten twenty-five points from me and twenty points from one other guy!
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:22 (nineteen years ago)
whoever put fat matty perps onto it first? I assume my exposure isn't entirely atypical, in that "Konichiwa Bitches" on Fluxblog -> checking out a couple of other tracks on blogs (eg "Bum Like You", "Who's That Girl") -> downloading a zip of the whole album when offered (eg on an ILM YSI thread) -> buying the fucker for under A$20 w/ free shipping when a link was posted on an ILM Robyn thread.
(Okay, the actually buying it part is possibly atypical.)
― kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 2 February 2006 00:55 (nineteen years ago)
― dan (dan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 01:29 (nineteen years ago)
My thing with Robyn goes like this - I really liked her single "Do You Know What It Takes" back in 98. Someone on slsk (don't remember who exactly, but they were European) mentioned that she had a new single called "Be Mine" and I liked it and posted it. A few months later, I managed to get a copy of the full album, and I posted "Konichiwa Bitches." And then it kinda took off over the course of the next few months among critic types.
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 2 February 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 02:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)
I'm losing my edgeTo the bloggers, who can name every Stephen O'Malley side project, from 1986 to today.
I'm losing my edgeTo the internet critics, who have heard every Peedi Peedi freestyle, B-side and tossed-off line.
But I was thereIn 1996, when Dizzee Rascal got his first PlayStationIn 1998, in the Congo, watching Konono No. 1 turn a blender into a subwoofer...
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 2 February 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)
so ... can someone who speaks fluent p&j tell me what type of music she is throwing subliminals at down here. as in some band names. I'm drawing a blank.
>>See, dudes, like Yoda says, there is no try, there is only do, and this squawky noise blast / nazi-porn-racism anti-music / Jim Goad drunk on Ivy League semiotics and bukkake—it's all try and no "do." And I know that that, supposedly, IS your point, but like, I mean, really—HOW IS THAT A POINT IN 2005 A.D.? It's not.
Jessica HopperChicago, Illinois
― Renard (Renard), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)
I probably will need to read more carefully to grasp Christgau's point about neoclassicism (help from any of you would be appreciated), but I'm sure that Jeezy and Three 6 can't be associated with it, whatever it is. First, those "appropriations" aren't appropriations* but part of the basic vocabulary of southern hip-hop, at this point, even if that part of the vocabulary has European rather than African antecedents. Second, "neoclassicism" doesn't mean "has ancestry that includes music that was once called 'classical'" but rather "self-consciously returns to a classic or classical style" (not that neoclassical necessarily apes the classic style, but it does use the style as reference and starting point). Crunk etc. (and the vast majority of southern hip-hop) isn't going back to the sound of 19th-20th century European classical (more accurately, romantic) music, but is rather taking intervals and chords - often ominous or eerie sounding ones - that made their way from symphonic music to the standard horror- and suspense-film soundtrack, where they live to this day.** But pulling from what's right now alive in your popular culture - movies!*** - isn't neoclassical, especially when you put the sounds into rhythmic forms where they'd never existed before.
I hate to sound like a lecturer here (esp. since I don't have the music theory vocab or knowledge to be at all precise about what I'm trying to say), but Christgau was making a reach that I can't follow. That hip-hop uses syncopation doesn't make it neoblues or neojazz; that it uses Euroromantic-derived melodies and chordings doesn't make it neoclassical. I'm not sure that Xgau meant seriously to connect hip-hop to the other "neoclassical" trends he was discerning; still, his comment seems almost random, and kind of goofy. If an actual metal or goth song had made the P&J lists, it'd almost certainly make use of Euroromantic-derived melodies and chordings, and this wouldn't make the track neoclassical; it'd make it metal or goth.
*Even if, say, Jeezy's fanfares are sampled, I don't get the logic behind calling them appropriations.
**Hip-hop is taking more than "darkness" from Euroromanticism, obviously. "Back that Azz Up" doesn't sound dark at all, but the melody is more Beethoven than blues.)
***Not to say that (1) hip-hop people never hear actual symphonic concerts or recordings (or that they never take music classes or go to music school) or (2) that classical records and concerts etc. aren't part of popular culture.
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 06:59 (nineteen years ago)
(Lil Wayne samples Iron Maiden in my favorite track on Tha Carter II, and I've yet to hear anyone suggest that this makes him classical. And the track doesn't seem drsatically different in feel from those that use ghostly soul samples.)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 07:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 2 February 2006 07:42 (nineteen years ago)
aids wolf, duh.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 February 2006 08:57 (nineteen years ago)
Even if she was taking down AIDS Wolf, they really made that big of an impact on her year?
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 2 February 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 11:28 (nineteen years ago)
http://music.villagevoice.com/03020106.mp3
― Chuck B, Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 2 February 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:11 (nineteen years ago)
"Mahavishnu is not a good band..they're not as good as Buck 65...he said 'Who's that?"...I said 'You'll find out later."
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:20 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
I think plenty of metal announces itself as classical and/or intellectual - Yngwie? Vai? Maiden (lyrically)?
Just read Draper's Ashlee thing
What/where is this?
― Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)
She wrote a blog post a while back complaining about the Noize Dude scene, and AIDS Wolf was the primary target.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), February 2nd, 2006 3:57 AM.
Yeah, and probably the likes of Prurient and twodeadsluts... onegoodfuck too, all the extreme noise bands that will never finish in the top 500 of the P&J.
AIDS Wolf has a girl in the band!
-- Whiney G. Weingarten (christopher...), February 2nd, 2006 5:07 AM.
A frequently naked one at that... which probably just reinforces Hopper's distaste.
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 2 February 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 2 February 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)
someone stop them
― Renard (Renard), Thursday, 2 February 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)
I went to the Noise Show at the new arts-space and the memo my brain is issuing is that, officially, I am over it. It being: this whole transgressive beardo / faux-ironic/non-ironic/ ironic -- "the "mystery" of are we serious, maybe maybe not?" -- the entire scene that playfully confuses facism-chic and fashion -- is straight up wack bullshit. These bands purposefully teeter the line of "might be joking" as their aesthetic statement, so that they can, conviently dial up, and then withdraw "meaning" from "transgressive" elements. So, that, if you are offended by say, a "questionable" song about rape, or a pro-bulimia anthem or a white man in leather screaming "PALESTINE/ISRAEL/PALESTINE/ ISRAEL!" pretending all the while like it's more than a signifier, you being offended might be the point, or if you aren;t that might be the point because hey man, all they are doing is pushing controversy without context and fronting like it's actually an aesthetic statement.
But it's not. It's effete bullshit.
There is no real idea, it's totally uncommital, reactionary and puerile fakery. At best, it aims for some elusive Albini-schooled pigfuck , but, it never gets there. BECAUSE THE GUN IS NOT EVEN LOADED. It's gestures are impotent, and while the impotent gesture is supposed to be the commentary on the (supposedly) potent gesture (potent gest could be delivered by Boston or emo or Xiu Xiu or Staind) or the affectation of understood potent gesture, and the inherant offense of potent gesture as being "genuine", because music/music culture being what it is, the genuine potent gesture is actually hollow and revolting , but here is the crux -- this impotent gesture, too, is also hollow and revolting -- so how is that commentary? Is that in fact ironic, too? Does that make it post-ironic ironic irony? Where is the actual transgression taking place? OUILA -- there is no actual transgression because they are parallel things, they are both revolting and hollow fake gestures not actually commenting on anything, it's all just like, dudes miming rhetorical handjobs into infinity and beyond.
See, dudes, like Yoda says, there is no try, there is only do, and this squawky noise blast / nazi-porn-racism anti-music / Jim Goad drunk on Ivy League semiotics, Whitehouse 12's and bukkake -- it's all try and no "do" -- and I know that that, supposedly, IS your point, but like, I mean, really --HOW IS THAT A POINT IN 2005 AD? It's not.
ALSO: Is it transgressive, or is it just generational ignorance, when you ask the door guy "What does AIDS Wolf sound like?" before you lay out 5 bucks, and the merch guy-so-greasy stands on the table and yells "I can tell you this: AIDS WOLF GAVE ME AIDS! WHOOO-HOO!"? I thought "Well, his trangressive trick worked. He is trying to show how much a fuck he does not give by offending me, and it worked. I am offended by him." The band, see, they did not work because I was just annoyed and not, in fact, disgusted.
I only stayed for one band. Bloodyminded (see above) were still playing when I left. The audience was doing the nouveau-scrub tie-dye shirts/ screaming/ "we're crazy mode" with one kid with shaved in male pattern baldness sig heiling and spraying his Sparks™ everywhere and "moshing" along with a few other people portraying/mocking geniune gestures of actual excitement.
Funny thing is, the reference to Whitehouse 12"s was removed. I like how she condemns a band whose show she didn't even stick around for. Now that's journalism!
― Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 2 February 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:25 (nineteen years ago)
the other one is, sadly, typical.
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)
sure, that chuck eddy edits out winky emoticons.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
hahaha yeah that was hilarious too. is that the same one that claims "arular" as a "great british pop album." ASSIMILATE OR DIE, dude.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)
Full disclosure: he also gave me some assignments for blender a couple years ago. Simon wouldn't do that.
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:54 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
(Do I need to start using emoticons here 'toine?)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:09 (nineteen years ago)
yes, because Smile is sacrosanct and untouchable, god forbid anyone not worship it
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
no, it's not because of that. it's because "song cycle" is untouchable, dude.
where'd smile rank last year anyway?
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:29 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)
well, of course. (you forgot to say "gotcha!" at the end, there, hstencil.)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
Smile > Illinois > Song Cycle = math is hard! (haha just kiddin')
holy shit "the attic" just came on.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
Just sayin'!
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:15 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:16 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:16 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:18 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:19 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:22 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:27 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 3 February 2006 06:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:48 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.villagevoice.com/music/0511,wood1,62093,22.html
This does a pretty good job of describing why the music is so much fun to listen to, but it goes haywire at the end when Woods gets all het up about white people daring to play world fusion music without being explicitly political - or something.
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
I just checked Metacritic, and there is no listing for Our New Orleans. Make it your business to get it up there. Even in these low-promo times, Melissa Cusick at Nonesuch will probably hook you up.
Duder, it's for charity! Everyone should BUY the fucking record, not try to glom one from Nonesuch!
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 23 February 2006 00:41 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 23 February 2006 02:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 23 February 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)
the author is the occasional political journalist i believe. scott erickson is the former twins pitcher. leif erickson 'discovered' north america, briefly wrote for the east village other.
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 23 February 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 23 February 2006 02:53 (nineteen years ago)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)