― gareth (gareth), Saturday, 9 November 2002 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Saturday, 9 November 2002 19:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Saturday, 9 November 2002 19:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 3 March 2003 15:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 March 2003 15:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 3 March 2003 15:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)
a) the sinclair-ackroyd books (esp sinclair) focus on the east more, partly tied in with history, theres this feeling of the east as timeless, as perhaps predating london itself
b) a wider shift over the last 20 years, sort of like the fetishization of working class people, you know, like on tv 20 years ago everyone sounded like hugh grant, and now they're all mancs, yorkshire and geordies. and the east is perceived as being more working class than the west, even though the west still has many many working class and poor areas, somehow perceived as less real, or at least less real in a 'glamourous' way
c) for a long time, london has been perceived from outside as having a north-south split, but this has been eclipsed, or at least equalled, by the current east-west split, and suspicion that this is in fact an older split, london as commerce, east as the workers.
d) the rise of hoxton/shoreditch in last 10 years, and gentrification of the warehouse districts around the city itself, leading to growing interest in the east in its entirety rather than just the bits which are in essence the city itself
e) the acquiescence of the west in this process, and the disappearance of betjamen as a orator of the 'wider london', which would have balanced the skewedness now. the death of the west, leads to unbalanced aesthetic of what constitutes the city
f) will brondesbury or kensal green ever be perceived as 'cool'?
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
Death of the west?!?
Yeah - Gareth wishes...along with the death of the south at the same time.
― bert (bert), Sunday, 9 November 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 9 November 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 10 November 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Monday, 10 November 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)
you're damn right, it's maintained by Jarvis
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)
A tube station in Hackney? Don't stretch the credibility, mate.
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 10 November 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)
somehow redbridge feels 'proper' east, whereas wanstead is part of londons missing northeast
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Friday, 21 May 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)