"Ronan is so OTM it is scary. There haven't been enough film threads recently."
I just say this today for the first time, and I think it may be the best film I have ever seen. It had so many mesmerizing scenes where I was on the edge of my seat shifting restlessly. The 190 mins went by really fast and there wasn't a moment where my thoughts wondered (and this is very impressive because I watched it in a library viewing cubicle with uncomfortable seats and headphones.)
(a side note: As I was leaving the library where I watched this movie. Being overstruck with emotion I put Julee Cruise's "mystery of love" on my walkman and started it just as I was walking outside. The vocals came in just as the cold air hit me and I looked up to see the sun setting. It was one of those amazing surreal moments.)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 14 February 2003 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 14 February 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)
You should try to see other films by Prévert/Carné, there are a lot. Carné was considered one of the greatest directors in the world for a long time (his film Le jour se lève made the Top 10 Sight & Sound poll in 1952, its first year), but his prestige was considerably diminished by the auterist/Cahiers crew and subsequent generations of film buffs.
Where do you live? If you live in the US there are only a few on DVD, if you live in the UK there are many available from France.
Anyway, some titles:
Drôle de drame (or Bizarre, Bizarre)--coming out on DVD in the US soon.Quai des brumes (or Port of Shadows)Le jour se lève Les visiteurs du soir
Prévert also wrote great films for/with Jean Renoir and Jean Grémillon. He was sort of ubiqitous--as a poet, as a screenwriter, and a left-wing journalist (and a songwriter!) in the 30s.
Anyway, it is fabulous when you emerge from the movie and everything has a different cast, even the air has changed; I feel more alert and aware of every sound, smell, sight. Coming out of the Brattle in Boston after seeing Ordet was the greatest such experience for me.
― Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 14 February 2003 03:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 14 February 2003 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 14 February 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 14 February 2003 04:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 14 February 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 14 February 2003 11:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 14 February 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)
I actually think Prevert's best writing is the films he made with Jean Gremillon and Pierre Laroche, Lumière d'été and Remorques (the latter has my favorite Jean Gabin role outside of Gueule d'amour .
― Amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 14 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 22:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)
This miming and constabule confounding is merely secondary! MEN.
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Also yes, I see your point about the *depressing* nature of the film, but the treatment of everyone as an object to be kept or adored or the inverse is a given in my cosmology... haha! just kidding!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 00:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
this thread is so cliquey now, that I'm going to post falco here!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:31 (twenty-one years ago)
It is a good movie, it should be watched. The bad thing is having to get up halfway thru and change discs!!
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Queen G of the morning after, Friday, 5 March 2004 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 5 March 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Friday, 5 March 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 6 March 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM.
Finally saw this (first part last night, second part tonight -- I actually think it works well with that bit of separation). I still can't believe I found the Criterion double-disc version used for $20. More thoughts later.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 01:51 (nineteen years ago)
― TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Friday, 9 June 2006 03:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Friday, 9 June 2006 03:39 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, Tom -- it's worth seeing, seriously.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 03:56 (nineteen years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 9 June 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)
Nope, but god knows I love the quality of the actors' voices, beautifully cast for that reason alone. V. easy to get into (and I love Them Other Two Film Classics too, so there ya go).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 04:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 9 June 2006 05:00 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 9 June 2006 06:50 (nineteen years ago)
Any love for Les Bas Fonds?
Incidentally, Barrault and his wife founded the Théâtre Marigny in '46 and put on plays there for ten years. He was the theater director for the Théâtre de l'Odéon from '59 until '68, putting on plays by Duras, Beckett, Genet, and Ionesco and only being kicked out after he let soixante-huitard students occupy the theater for a month. From '66 to '68, he was also the director of the Théâtre des Nations, bringing over, notably, Peter Brook's Living Theater. He had several other theaters afterwards. He is known in the States primarily as a film actor and he did continue to work in films for many years but amongst the French and especially amongst actors, he is revered for his commitment to the stage.
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)
Still so much I could say about this film and I almost don't know where to start. Hmm hmm hmm. For a beginning, then, I think this is a film where its 'minor' characters almost uniformly play key roles, and that if they weren't there then it wouldn't be as grand as it is. And I say that noting that there's a striking, almost dramatic difference between those characters who individually speak and 'the mob,' whether it's the audience at the various theaters or the crowds on the Boulevard, who often seem to speak in one voice. Not a deep thought, perhaps, but it struck me, and I am still teasing it out. If Prevert's screenplay was more or less followed faithfully then I really have to praise him beyond measure.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
As I was looking up some info on Barrault, I found something of trivial interest for all the Amélie lovers and haters. It's full title in French, translated, is 'The Fabulous Destiny of Amélie Poulain' and appears to be calqued directly from Sacha Guitry's screenplay Le destin fabuleux de Désirée Clary, filmed in '42, a story about a young marseillaise destined to marry Joseph Bonaparte who falls for his brother, Napoleon. She ends up marrying one of his Marshals, Bernadotte, who eventually becomes king of Sweden.
― M. White (Miguelito), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)
I saw it a few years ago on a crappy two-part videocassette. The Criterion edition has always been on my list of essential purchases. Damn Ned to hell for buying it for $20 :)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 June 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)