there are these ones that say 'd + g beachwear' that i've seen and like, but could you honestly wear them *not* at the beach ?
a source of much pleasure when walking around the country =the sight of us british in shorts.beige shorts that have pockets in, well they always crack me up. especially when they are laoded down with car keys, wallet, filofax or equivalent etc and have buttons on. dead funny.
shorts then.
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 3 June 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
When am I not wearing them? In the summer months at least.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron A., Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― fiona (fiona), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Sub-topic: Cut-offs...C/D? (I'm guessing most of y'all'll say dud, but psh whatevah I say classic!)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron A., Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron A., Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
i wear them sometimes. my only particular preferences are that a) they look okay on me, and b) they aren't white. that's all. sometimes they are necessary and even good.
that being said, this is the best i'll ever look in shorts:
http://kerfuffle.org/images/cute4.jpg
― janni (janni), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― chester (synkro), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Viva La Sam (thatgirl), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― chris (chris), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)
I like to wear clothes I look good in, and shorts are just not flattering.
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bryan (Bryan), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Broheems (diamond), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― sorrry (Oops), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Broheems (diamond), Friday, 13 February 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)
WHY WAS BRYAN WEARING A WIG WHILE DOING HOUSEWORK??
― Viva La Sam (thatgirl), Saturday, 14 February 2004 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)
http://party.islife.org/div/worstalbumcovers/tino[1].jpg
― gygax! (gygax!), Saturday, 14 February 2004 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Saturday, 14 February 2004 02:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Speeds Man (Speeds Man), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Dude, we get it ok stop going on about your pervy dick-exposing shorts obsession! Man.
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bryan B Sure (Bryan), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bryan B Sure (Bryan), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)
This conundrum had never existed before. In the days before Gay Identity Politics, there had been a naïve disregard for sexual orientation, a simplistic credo that maleness always meant heteroness. Sure, queers existed, but somewhere else, maybe in Greenwich Village or some offbeat locale like San Francisco. They were invisible; they were irrelevant. However males chose to look or behave or dress was, ipso facto, properly and appropriately heterosexual because, after all, what else could it be? Nothing can "look gay" when there's no gay way to look, no gay identity, no gay anything. Boys in Speedos? Hetero. Boys in short-shorts? Hetero. Only when gays asserted themselves to become a conspicuous and distinctive subpopulation, a distinctive demographic Other to the hetero Us, did a way of looking gay and dressing gay emerge.
Sports, due to Michael Jordan's early influence, were first to convert and transmogrify, basketball especially susceptible to this grotesque imperative of the thuggish, of the buffoonish. All other sports quickly and slavishly followed, an identical evolution from short to long, from tight to baggy. Soccer shorts and gym shorts, track shorts and tennis shorts and boxing trunks-all underwent this same transformation. Wrestling singlets also were lengthened to eliminate the inappropriate display of bare thighs.
We have the Christian Right, Jerry Falwell and his Moral Majority, Phyllis Schlafly and her Eagle Forum and other demagogues to thank for this development.
― Jonathan Levi, Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Note: My shorts came out today it´s warm andnice, and it will be a hot summer in Stockholm, Sweden, Scandinavia, Europe.
― Jonathan Levi, Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 2 May 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 May 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 2 May 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)
I do a lot of walking -- and therefore I have no problem with my legs at all. Hurrah shorts!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 2 May 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 2 May 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
"hmm, 5 mile jog today and it's 75 out, how about an ankle length burqua...?"
― gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 2 May 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 May 2004 17:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 2 May 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 May 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Although those Old Navy yoga pants are okay.
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Sunday, 2 May 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost i hope you're joking
― oops (Oops), Sunday, 2 May 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)
...or anything else?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 2 May 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
http://clampettstudio.com/images/opc/sept2003/04-85930-Porky.jpg
― Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Sunday, 2 May 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)